ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems
PATCH 1/1 ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct fsmap_head cmd = {
.fmh_count = ...;
.fmh_keys = {
{ .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, },
{ .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, },
},...
};
ret = ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);
Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000
For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.
IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of /dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:
fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3},
fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.
The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means that s_first_data_block is nonzero. ext4_get_group_no_and_offset subtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.
The net result of this encoding is that blocknr < s_first_data_block is not a valid input to this function. The end_fsb variable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:
blocknr = blocknr - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
The division then operates on -1:
offset = do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)) >> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;
Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr. ext4_getfsmap_check_keys checked that keys[0].fmr_physical and keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, but ext4_getfsmap_datadev adjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at least s_first_data_block. This implies that we have to check it again after the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot.
--- fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2 -0
@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb, keys[0 ].fmr_physical = bofs;if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical >= eofs) keys[1 ].fmr_physical = eofs -1 ; +if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical < keys[0 ].fmr_physical) +return 0 ; start_fsb = keys[0 ].fmr_physical; end_fsb = keys[1 ].fmr_physical;
Quoted 3 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Fixes 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Please add:
- Eric
Hi, Darrick,
Quoted 103 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct fsmap_head cmd = { .fmh_count = ...; .fmh_keys = { { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, },...
};
ret =ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:
kernel BUG at
fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMPCPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.
IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of
/dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.
The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in
ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means thats_first_data_blockis nonzero.ext4_get_group_no_and_offsetsubtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.The net result of this encoding is that blocknr <
s_first_data_blockis not a valid input to this function. Theend_fsbvariable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:blocknr = blocknr - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);The division then operates on -1:
offset = do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)) >> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr.
ext4_getfsmap_check_keyschecked that keys[0].fmr_physical and keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, butext4_getfsmap_datadevadjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at leasts_first_data_block. This implies that we have to check it again after the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot.Fixes 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)fs/ext4/fsmap.c +0
-0
fs/ext4/fsmap.c static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb, · line 490
Quoted 5 lines
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb, keys[0 ].fmr_physical = bofs;if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical >= eofs) keys[1 ].fmr_physical = eofs -1 ; +if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical < keys[0 ].fmr_physical) +return 0 ;
This is an indirect implication, we can be more straightforward. Also we should stop the execution when high_key->fmr_physical == bofs. So maybe:
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2 -0
@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb,int error =0 ; bofs =le32_to_cpu (sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block); +if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical <= bofs) +return 0 ; eofs =ext4_blocks_count (sbi->s_es);if (keys[0 ].fmr_physical >= eofs)return 0 ;
But I'm not thrilled about this. Can we stop the execution earlier? How about something like:
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +4 -2
@@ -586,10 +586,12 @@ static bool ext4_getfsmap_check_keys(struct ext4_fsmap *low_key, {if (low_key->fmr_device > high_key->fmr_device)return false; -if (low_key->fmr_device < high_key->fmr_device) +if (low_key->fmr_device !=0 && + low_key->fmr_device < high_key->fmr_device)return true; -if (low_key->fmr_physical > high_key->fmr_physical) +if (high_key->fmr_physical ==0 || + low_key->fmr_physical > high_key->fmr_physical)return false;if (low_key->fmr_physical < high_key->fmr_physical)return true;
You'll notice that my proposal will stop the execution with -EINVAL, as the key range is invalid IMO. But we can adapt code to return zero if you like, what I'm interested in is whether this key check is valid for ext4_getfsmap_logdev() or not. How about the
if (keys[1].fmr_physical == bofs) check, is it valid for ext4_getfsmap_logdev()?
I'd like that with your guidance to fix this bug, extend the xfs_io fsmap support to query ext4 fs range and to add an xfstest for keys validation, to check if stable kernels will be fixed. This would help me with the fs ramp-up, as I'd like to fix some other fs bugs too. If you want to handle this by yourself, it's fine too, but please let me know so that we don't duplicate effort.
Cheers,
ta
Quoted 127 lines · Tudor Ambarus
Hi, Darrick,
Quoted 103 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct
fsmap_headcmd = {
.fmh_count = ...;
.fmh_keys = {
{ .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, },
...
};
ret =ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:
kernel BUG at
fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMPCPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.
IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of
/dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device =
major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device =major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.
The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means that
s_first_data_blockis nonzero.ext4_get_group_no_and_offsetsubtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.The net result of this encoding is that blocknr <
s_first_data_blockis not a valid input to this function. Theend_fsbvariable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:blocknr = blocknr -
le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);The division then operates on -1:
offset =
do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))>> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr.
ext4_getfsmap_check_keyschecked that keys[0].fmr_physical and keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, butext4_getfsmap_datadevadjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at least s_first_data_block. This implies that we have to check it again after the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot.Fixes 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>---
fs/ext4/fsmap.c| 2 ++1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)fs/ext4/fsmap.c +0
-0fs/ext4/fsmap.c static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct · line 491
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(structsuper_block *sb, keys[0].fmr_physical = bofs; if (keys[1].fmr_physical >= eofs) keys[1].fmr_physical = eofs - 1; + if (keys[1].fmr_physical < keys[0].fmr_physical) + return 0;This is an indirect implication, we can be more straightforward. Also we should stop the execution when
high_key->fmr_physical== bofs. So maybe:fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb, int error = 0; bofs = le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block); + if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= bofs) + return 0; eofs = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es); if (keys[0].fmr_physical >= eofs)
Quoted 1 line
return 0;
oops, it was too morning for me, this is wrong, as the high key can come with zero value. So if we want to keep the check in ext4_getfsmap_datadev we can use your patch, but slightly adapted to
if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= keys[0].fmr_physical)
return 0;
However I think I prefer the version from below if it makes sense. Cheers,
ta
Quoted 42 lines
But I'm not thrilled about this. Can we stop the execution earlier? How about something like:
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +4
-2@@ -586,10 +586,12 @@ static bool ext4_getfsmap_check_keys(structext4_fsmap *low_key, { if (low_key->fmr_device > high_key->fmr_device) return false; - if (low_key->fmr_device < high_key->fmr_device) + if (low_key->fmr_device != 0 && + low_key->fmr_device < high_key->fmr_device) return true; - if (low_key->fmr_physical > high_key->fmr_physical) + if (high_key->fmr_physical == 0 || + low_key->fmr_physical > high_key->fmr_physical) return false; if (low_key->fmr_physical < high_key->fmr_physical)return true;
You'll notice that my proposal will stop the execution with
-EINVAL, as the key range is invalid IMO. But we can adapt code to return zero if you like, what I'm interested in is whether this key check is valid forext4_getfsmap_logdev()or not. How about the
if (keys[1].fmr_physical == bofs) check, is it valid forext4_getfsmap_logdev()?I'd like that with your guidance to fix this bug, extend the
xfs_iofsmap support to query ext4 fs range and to add an xfstest for keys validation, to check if stable kernels will be fixed. This would help me with the fs ramp-up, as I'd like to fix some other fs bugs too. If you want to handle this by yourself, it's fine too, but please let me know so that we don't duplicate effort.Cheers,
ta
Quoted 125 lines · Tudor Ambarus
Quoted 122 lines · Tudor Ambarus
Hi, Darrick,
Quoted 103 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct
fsmap_headcmd = {
.fmh_count = ...;
.fmh_keys = {
{ .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, },
...
};
ret =ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:
kernel BUG at
fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMPCPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.
IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of
/dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device =
major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device =major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.
The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means that
s_first_data_blockis nonzero.ext4_get_group_no_and_offsetsubtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.The net result of this encoding is that blocknr <
s_first_data_blockis not a valid input to this function. Theend_fsbvariable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:blocknr = blocknr -
le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);The division then operates on -1:
offset =
do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))>> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr.
ext4_getfsmap_check_keyschecked that keys[0].fmr_physical and keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, butext4_getfsmap_datadevadjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at least s_first_data_block. This implies that we have to check it again after the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot.Fixes 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>---
fs/ext4/fsmap.c| 2 ++1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)fs/ext4/fsmap.c +0
-0fs/ext4/fsmap.c static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct · line 491
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(structsuper_block *sb, keys[0].fmr_physical = bofs; if (keys[1].fmr_physical >= eofs) keys[1].fmr_physical = eofs - 1; + if (keys[1].fmr_physical < keys[0].fmr_physical) + return 0;This is an indirect implication, we can be more straightforward. Also we should stop the execution when
high_key->fmr_physical== bofs. So maybe:fs/ext4/fsmap.c +0
-0@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(structsuper_block *sb, int error = 0;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0bofs = le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block); + if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= bofs) + return 0; eofs = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es); if (keys[0].fmr_physical >= eofs)return 0;
oops, it was too morning for me, this is wrong, as the high key can come with zero value. So if we want to keep the check in
or maybe not? xfsprogs-dev/io/fsmap.c initializes h->fmr_physical = end; and end = -1 for the ext4 case.
From the code I see two magic values that are accepted for fmr_device, zero and UINT_MAX, so maybe we should check the sanity of the keys's fmr_physical considering the magic values for fmr_device. I'll stop burbling and wait for Darrick's feedback.
Cheers,
ta
Quoted 50 lines
ext4_getfsmap_datadevwe can use your patch, but slightly adapted to if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= keys[0].fmr_physical)
return 0;However I think I prefer the version from below if it makes sense. Cheers,
taQuoted 42 lines
But I'm not thrilled about this. Can we stop the execution earlier? How about something like:
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +4
-2@@ -586,10 +586,12 @@ static bool ext4_getfsmap_check_keys(structext4_fsmap *low_key, { if (low_key->fmr_device > high_key->fmr_device) return false; - if (low_key->fmr_device < high_key->fmr_device) + if (low_key->fmr_device != 0 && + low_key->fmr_device < high_key->fmr_device) return true; - if (low_key->fmr_physical > high_key->fmr_physical) + if (high_key->fmr_physical == 0 || + low_key->fmr_physical > high_key->fmr_physical) return false; if (low_key->fmr_physical < high_key->fmr_physical)return true;
You'll notice that my proposal will stop the execution with
-EINVAL, as the key range is invalid IMO. But we can adapt code to return zero if you like, what I'm interested in is whether this key check is valid forext4_getfsmap_logdev()or not. How about the
if (keys[1].fmr_physical == bofs) check, is it valid forext4_getfsmap_logdev()?I'd like that with your guidance to fix this bug, extend the
xfs_iofsmap support to query ext4 fs range and to add an xfstest for keys validation, to check if stable kernels will be fixed. This would help me with the fs ramp-up, as I'd like to fix some other fs bugs too. If you want to handle this by yourself, it's fine too, but please let me know so that we don't duplicate effort.Cheers,
ta
Hi, Darrick,
Quoted 127 lines · Tudor Ambarus
Hi, Darrick,
Quoted 103 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct
fsmap_headcmd = {
.fmh_count = ...;
.fmh_keys = {
{ .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, },
...
};
ret =ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:
kernel BUG at
fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMPCPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.
IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of
/dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device =
major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device =major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.
The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means that
s_first_data_blockis nonzero.ext4_get_group_no_and_offsetsubtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.The net result of this encoding is that blocknr <
s_first_data_blockis not a valid input to this function. Theend_fsbvariable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:blocknr = blocknr -
le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);The division then operates on -1:
offset =
do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))>> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr.
ext4_getfsmap_check_keyschecked that keys[0].fmr_physical and keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, butext4_getfsmap_datadevadjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at least s_first_data_block. This implies that we have to check it again after the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot.Fixes 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>---
fs/ext4/fsmap.c| 2 ++1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)fs/ext4/fsmap.c +0
-0fs/ext4/fsmap.c static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct · line 491
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(structsuper_block *sb, keys[0].fmr_physical = bofs; if (keys[1].fmr_physical >= eofs) keys[1].fmr_physical = eofs - 1; + if (keys[1].fmr_physical < keys[0].fmr_physical) + return 0;This is an indirect implication, we can be more straightforward. Also we should stop the execution when
high_key->fmr_physical== bofs. So maybe:fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb, int error = 0; bofs = le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block); + if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= bofs) + return 0; eofs = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es); if (keys[0].fmr_physical >= eofs)
Quoted 1 line
return 0;
Just wanted to let you know that I sent this patch together with two others at:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/[email protected]/T/
Cheers,
ta
Ping, Ted?
--D
Quoted 111 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct fsmap_head cmd = { .fmh_count = ...; .fmh_keys = { { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, },...
};
ret =ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:
kernel BUG at
fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMPCPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.
IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of
/dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.
The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in
ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means thats_first_data_blockis nonzero.ext4_get_group_no_and_offsetsubtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.The net result of this encoding is that blocknr <
s_first_data_blockis not a valid input to this function. Theend_fsbvariable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:blocknr = blocknr - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);The division then operates on -1:
offset = do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)) >> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr.
ext4_getfsmap_check_keyschecked that keys[0].fmr_physical and keys[1].fmr_physical are in increasing order, butext4_getfsmap_datadevadjusts keys[0].fmr_physical to be at leasts_first_data_block. This implies that we have to check it again after the adjustment, which is the piece that I forgot.Fixes 4a4956249dac ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)fs/ext4/fsmap.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb, keys[0 ].fmr_physical = bofs;if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical >= eofs) keys[1 ].fmr_physical = eofs -1 ; +if (keys[1 ].fmr_physical < keys[0 ].fmr_physical) +return 0 ; start_fsb = keys[0 ].fmr_physical; end_fsb = keys[1 ].fmr_physical;
Quoted 10 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:
struct fsmap_head cmd = { .fmh_count = ...; .fmh_keys = { { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, },
Quoted 5 lines
...
};
ret =ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);[...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems
commit: c993799baf9c5861f8df91beb80e1611b12efcbd
Best regards,
Signature · 1 line
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>