firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement
The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended. Also it's cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.
Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
--- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +2 -2
@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (ret) goto clear_dev_req_notifier; -/* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */ -return ret; +/* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */ +return 0 ; }/* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
Cristian Marussi
reviewerQuoted 14 lines · Dan Carpenter
The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended. Also it's cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.
Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>--- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +0
-0
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 2746
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +2
-2@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (ret) goto clear_dev_req_notifier; -/* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */ -return ret; +/* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */ +return 0 ; }/* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */
Indeed.
Thanks,
Cristian
Sudeep Holla
AppliedQuoted 4 lines · Dan Carpenter
The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended. Also it's cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/8ab5059dc4f4
--
Regards,
Sudeep