vc04_services: mmal-vchiq: fix typo in comment
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 vc04_services: mmal-vchiq: fix typo in comment
Correct typo from 'witin' to 'within' in comment.
--- drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c +1 -1
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void event_to_host_cb(struct vchiq_mmal_instance *instance,/* workqueue scheduled callback * * we do this because it is important we do not call any other vchiq -* sync calls from witin the message delivery thread +* sync calls from within the message delivery thread */ static void buffer_work_cb (struct work_struct *work) {
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 24 lines · Jongwoo Han
Correct typo from 'witin' to 'within' in comment.
Signed-off-by Jongwoo Han <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c +1
-1@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void event_to_host_cb(struct vchiq_mmal_instance *instance,/* workqueue scheduled callback * * we do this because it is important we do not call any other vchiq -* sync calls from witin the message delivery thread +* sync calls from within the message delivery thread */ static void buffer_work_cb (struct work_struct *work) {Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot