5.10.12-rc1 review
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Naresh Kamboju
Tested-by Linux Kernel Functional TestingQuoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.12-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06
git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11)
Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kselftest
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* fwts
* kunit
* rcutorture
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
Signature · 2 lines
Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 19 lines · Naresh Kamboju
Quoted 17 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm,x86_64, and i386.
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h
Jon Hunter
Tested-byQuoted 7 lines · Naresh Kamboju
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Replying here because I don't have the original.
Test results for stable-v5.10:
12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
65 tests: 65 pass, 0 failLinux version: 5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04Jon
Signature · 1 line
nvpublic
Guenter Roeck
Tested-byQuoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Guenter
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 10 lines · Guenter Roeck
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Quoted 6 lines
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0Tested-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.
greg k-h
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Pavel Machek
Quoted 4 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h