revert series of umn.edu commits for v5.11.y
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): YICidTdSYPut4oVa@debian
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v5.11.y
Hi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
Sasha Levin
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
Let's wait with these until reverts are merged upstream, we don't want to diverge here.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Sasha
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 5 lines · Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
Let's wait with these until reverts are merged upstream, we don't want to diverge here.
I agree, I am going to wait until the reverts hit Linus's tree before doing anything. That is probably going to take a few weeks as I wade through this mess...
greg k-h
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v5.10.y
In reply to a message not in the archiveHi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v5.4.y
In reply to a message not in the archiveHi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v4.19.y
In reply to a message not in the archiveHi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v4.14.y
In reply to a message not in the archiveHi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v4.9.y
In reply to a message not in the archiveHi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
PATCH RESEND 1/1 revert series of umn.edu commits for v4.4.y
In reply to a message not in the archiveHi Greg,
Resending with individual attachments as the previous mail with all the attachments (sent last night) did not appear in https://lore.kernel.org/stable.
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert (till last night). So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
--
Regards
Sudip
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerRe: revert series of umn.edu commits
In reply to a message not in the archiveQuoted 6 lines · Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Greg,
This is based on the 190 commits that you posted for mainline. Out of that 24 patches had a reply mail asking not to revert. So, the attached series for stable is based on the remaining 166 commits. I have borrowed the commit message from your series.
Thanks for doing these, but now that the "real" reverts and fixes are in Linus's tree, we don't need these series anymore.
thanks for the help,
greg k-h