5.10.67-rc1 review
Subsystems (5)
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.67 release. There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:57:06 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.67-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.67-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 729f504fde252d9bd1854ba90456253c3df643f5
* git describe: v5.10.66-307-g729f504fde25
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.66-307-g729f504fde25
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.65-55-g84286fd568e7)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.65-55-g84286fd568e7)
## Test result summary
total: 86342, pass: 72348, fail: 568, skip: 12351, xfail: 1075
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 289 total, 289 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 35 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi!
Quoted 4 lines
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.67 release. There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.67 release. There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:57:06 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 472 pass: 472 fail: 0
Guenter
Hi Greg,
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.67 release. There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:57:06 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/145
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/144
--
Regards
Sudip
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.67 release. There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:57:06 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.67-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.67-rc1,
Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.67-rc1
Commit: 729f504fde252d9bd1854ba90456253c3df643f5
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8907
passed: 8907
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8907
passed: 8907
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------