usb: typec: clear usb_pd flag if change to typec only mode
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v2 1/1 usb: typec: clear usb_pd flag if change to typec only mode
Set usb_pd to 0 when power operation mode
leaving power delivery. That can avoid user-sepace read "yes" form the supports_usb_power_delivery_show() attribute but power operation mode already change form power delivery to others mode.
--- drivers/usb/typec/class.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/typec/class.c +2 -0
@@ -1718,6 +1718,8 @@ void typec_set_pwr_opmode(struct typec_port *port, partner->usb_pd =1 ;sysfs_notify (&partner_dev->kobj,NULL ,"supports_usb_power_delivery" ); + }else if (opmode !=TYPEC_PWR_MODE_PD && partner->usb_pd) { + partner->usb_pd =0 ; }put_device (partner_dev); }
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 27 lines · Steven Syu
Set
usb_pdto 0 when power operation mode
leaving power delivery. That can avoid user-sepace read "yes" form thesupports_usb_power_delivery_show()attribute but power operation mode already change form power delivery to others mode.Signed-off-by Steven Syu <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/typec/class.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)drivers/usb/typec/class.c +2
-0@@ -1718,6 +1718,8 @@ void typec_set_pwr_opmode(struct typec_port *port, partner->usb_pd =1 ;sysfs_notify (&partner_dev->kobj,NULL ,"supports_usb_power_delivery" ); + }else if (opmode !=TYPEC_PWR_MODE_PD && partner->usb_pd) { + partner->usb_pd =0 ; }put_device (partner_dev); }Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot