ucsi_ccg: Check DEV_INT bit only when starting CCG4
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v4 1/1 ucsi_ccg: Check DEV_INT bit only when starting CCG4
From: Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>
after driver sending the UCSI_START cmd, CCGx would clear Bit 0:Device Interrupt in the INTR_REG if CCGX reset successfully.
however, there might be a chance that other bits in INTR_REG are not cleared due to internal data queued in PPM and cause the driver thinks CCGx reset failed.
the commit checks bit 0 in INTR_REG and ignore other bits. ucsi driver would reset PPM later.
--- drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c +1 -1
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_init(struct ucsi_ccg *uc)if (status <0 )return status; -if (!data) +if (!(data &DEV_INT ))return 0 ; status =ccg_write (uc,CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG , &data,sizeof (data));
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 36 lines · Wayne Chang
From: Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>
after driver sending the
UCSI_STARTcmd, CCGx would clear Bit 0:Device Interrupt in theINTR_REGif CCGX reset successfully.however, there might be a chance that other bits in
INTR_REGare not cleared due to internal data queued in PPM and cause the driver thinks CCGx reset failed.the commit checks bit 0 in
INTR_REGand ignore other bits. ucsi driver would reset PPM later.Fixes 247c554a14aa ("usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx")Signed-off-by Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Wayne Chang <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c +1
-1@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_init(struct ucsi_ccg *uc)if (status <0 )return status; -if (!data) +if (!(data &DEV_INT ))return 0 ; status =ccg_write (uc,CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG , &data,sizeof (data));Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Heikki Krogerus
maintainerHi,
Quoted 6 lines · Wayne Chang
From: Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>
after driver sending the
UCSI_STARTcmd, CCGx would clear Bit 0:Device Interrupt in theINTR_REGif CCGX reset successfully.
Quoted 8 lines
however, there might be a chance that other bits in
INTR_REGare not cleared due to internal data queued in PPM and cause the driver thinks CCGx reset failed.the commit checks bit 0 in
INTR_REGand ignore other bits. ucsi driver would reset PPM later.Fixes 247c554a14aa ("usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx")
So... no need to take this to the stable kernel releases?
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Wayne Chang <[email protected]>---
What has changed since v3 (and v2) - there is no patch changelog here?
In case this is new to you, you list those changes under that '---' line so they don't become part of the permanent changelog:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c +0
-0
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c static int ucsi_ccg_init(struct ucsi_ccg *uc) · line 331
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c +1
-1@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_init(struct ucsi_ccg *uc)if (status <0 )return status; -if (!data) +if (!(data &DEV_INT ))return 0 ; status =ccg_write (uc,CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG , &data,sizeof (data));
thanks,
Signature · 1 line
heikki
Hi Heikki
Thanks for the review.
Quoted 15 lines · Heikki Krogerus
Hi,
Quoted 10 lines · Wayne Chang
From: Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>
after driver sending the
UCSI_STARTcmd, CCGx would clear Bit 0:Device Interrupt in theINTR_REGif CCGX reset successfully.however, there might be a chance that other bits in
INTR_REGare not cleared due to internal data queued in PPM and cause the driver thinks CCGx reset failed.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
the commit checks bit 0 in
INTR_REGand ignore other bits. ucsi driver would reset PPM later.Fixes 247c554a14aa ("usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx")So... no need to take this to the stable kernel releases?
Should I put cc tag here?
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Wayne Chang <[email protected]>---
What has changed since v3 (and v2) - there is no patch changelog here?
In case this is new to you, you list those changes under that '---' line so they don't become part of the permanent changelog:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
The changes are resent for updating the commit messages.
Added the Fixes tag which Greg asked for.
Thanks for information. I went through the documents.
Should I put the following messages in the patch after "---" or should I use resend in subject for the commit messages updated?
v3 -> v4 commit messages updated
v2 -> v3 commit messages updated
v1 -> v2 commit messages updated
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c +1
-1@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_init(struct ucsi_ccg *uc)if (status <0 )return status; -if (!data) +if (!(data &DEV_INT ))return 0 ;
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c static int ucsi_ccg_init(struct ucsi_ccg *uc) · line 331
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c +0
-0status =ccg_write (uc,CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG , &data,sizeof (data));thanks,
--
heikki
thanks,
Wayne.
Heikki Krogerus
maintainerQuoted 20 lines · Wayne Chang
Hi Heikki
Thanks for the review.
Quoted 15 lines · Heikki Krogerus
Hi,
Quoted 10 lines · Wayne Chang
From: Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>
after driver sending the
UCSI_STARTcmd, CCGx would clear Bit 0:Device Interrupt in theINTR_REGif CCGX reset successfully.however, there might be a chance that other bits in
INTR_REGare not cleared due to internal data queued in PPM and cause the driver thinks CCGx reset failed.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
the commit checks bit 0 in
INTR_REGand ignore other bits. ucsi driver would reset PPM later.Fixes 247c554a14aa ("usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx")So... no need to take this to the stable kernel releases?
Should I put cc tag here?
Yes, Cc: [email protected], unless you have some good reason not to. I'm guessing you don't. This stuff is also explained here:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#select-the-recipients-for-your-patch
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Wayne Chang <[email protected]>---
What has changed since v3 (and v2) - there is no patch changelog here?
In case this is new to you, you list those changes under that '---' line so they don't become part of the permanent changelog:
Quoted 8 lines
The changes are resent for updating the commit messages.
Added the Fixes tag which Greg asked for.
Thanks for information. I went through the documents.
Should I put the following messages in the patch after "---" or should I use resend in subject for the commit messages updated?
v3 -> v4 commit messages updated
I think you can say exactly what you did, like "Added the Fixes tag" or whatever you did.
Quoted 1 line
v2 -> v3 commit messages updated
Ditto.
Quoted 1 line
v1 -> v2 commit messages updated
Ditto.
Since you are going to do one more version of this, could you also start the sentences with upper-case letters in the commit message? Normally I'm not very picky about the grammar stuff (I make plenty of mistakes myself), but this time it's driving me crazy for some reason.
thanks,
Signature · 1 line
heikki
Quoted 28 lines · Heikki Krogerus
Quoted 25 lines · Wayne Chang
Hi Heikki
Thanks for the review.
Quoted 20 lines · Heikki Krogerus
Hi,
Quoted 14 lines · Wayne Chang
From: Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>
after driver sending the
UCSI_STARTcmd, CCGx would clear Bit 0:Device Interrupt in theINTR_REGif CCGX reset successfully.however, there might be a chance that other bits in
INTR_REGare not cleared due to internal data queued in PPM and cause the driver thinks CCGx reset failed.the commit checks bit 0 in
INTR_REGand ignore other bits. ucsi driver would reset PPM later.Fixes 247c554a14aa ("usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx")
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So... no need to take this to the stable kernel releases?
Should I put cc tag here?
Yes, Cc: [email protected], unless you have some good reason not to. I'm guessing you don't. This stuff is also explained here:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#select-the-recipients-for-your-patch
Thanks for the information. I'll add the Cc tag in the next version.
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Sing-Han Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Wayne Chang <[email protected]>---
What has changed since v3 (and v2) - there is no patch changelog here?
In case this is new to you, you list those changes under that '---' line so they don't become part of the permanent changelog:
Quoted 8 lines
The changes are resent for updating the commit messages.
Added the Fixes tag which Greg asked for.
Thanks for information. I went through the documents.
Should I put the following messages in the patch after "---" or should I use resend in subject for the commit messages updated?
v3 -> v4 commit messages updatedI think you can say exactly what you did, like "Added the Fixes tag" or whatever you did.
Quoted 1 line
v2 -> v3 commit messages updated
Ditto.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
v1 -> v2 commit messages updated
Ditto.
Since you are going to do one more version of this, could you also start the sentences with upper-case letters in the commit message? Normally I'm not very picky about the grammar stuff (I make plenty of mistakes myself), but this time it's driving me crazy for some reason.
Sure, I'll also minimize the words in a sentence and make it readable. Thanks for the advice.
Quoted 5 lines
thanks,
--
heikki
thanks,
Wayne.