seq_file: fix NULL pointer arithmetic warning

Implement conditional logic in order to replace NULL pointer arithmetic.

The use of NULL pointer arithmetic was pointed out by clang with the following warning:

fs/kernfs/file.c:128:15: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]

                return NULL + !*ppos;
                       ~~~~ ^
fs/seq_file.c:559:14: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a
null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
        return NULL + (*pos == 0);

---
 fs/kernfs/file.c | 6 ++++--
 fs/seq_file.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

index 9414a7a60a9f..3a6990c7fe8e 100644
@@ -120,12 +120,14 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_start(struct seq_file *sf, loff_t *ppos)
 		if (next == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV))
 			kernfs_seq_stop_active(sf, next);
 		return next;
-	} else {
+	} else if (*ppos) {
 		/*
 		 * The same behavior and code as single_open().  Returns
 		 * !NULL if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, NULL.
 		 */
-		return NULL + !*ppos;
+		return NULL;
+	} else {
+		return (void *) 1;
 	}
 }
 

index f8e1f4ee87ff..7b6165d5d829 100644
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_dentry);
 
 static void *single_start(struct seq_file *p, loff_t *pos)
 {
-	return NULL + (*pos == 0);
+	return *pos ? NULL : (void *) 1;
 }
 
 static void *single_next(struct seq_file *p, void *v, loff_t *pos)

2.34.1

NAK. _If_ you want to bother with that at all, at least make it use SEQ_START_TOKEN, rather than open-coding it; what's more, kernfs_seq_start() should simply call single_start() instead of open-coding it. I.e.

	if (ops->seq_start) {
		void *next = ops->seq_start(sf, ppos);
		/* see the comment above kernfs_seq_stop_active() */
		if (next == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV))
			kernfs_seq_stop_active(sf, next);
		return next;
	} else {
		return single_start(sf, ppos);
	}
and
	return *ppos ? NULL : SEQ_START_TOKEN;

in single_start() itself.