f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode
Subsystems (2)
Chao Yu
maintainerPATCH v4 1/1 f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode
Yanming reported a kernel bug in Bugzilla kernel [1], which can be reproduced. The bug message is:
The kernel message is shown below:
kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:611!
Call Trace: evict+0x282/0x4e0 __dentry_kill+0x2b2/0x4d0 dput+0x2dd/0x720 do_renameat2+0x596/0x970 __x64_sys_rename+0x78/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215895
The bug is due to fuzzed inode has both inline_data and encrypted flags. During f2fs_evict_inode(), as the inode was deleted by rename(), it will cause inline data conversion due to conflicting flags. The page cache will be polluted and the panic will be triggered in clear_inode().
Try fixing the bug by doing more sanity checks for inline data inode in sanity_check_inode().
---
v4:
- introduce and use f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk() only for sanity_check_inode().
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 ++++++++++++++- fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +- fs/f2fs/inline.c | 11 ++++++++--- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 3 +-- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +14 -1
@@ -4039,7 +4039,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;/* * inline.c */ -bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode); +bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode,bool sanity_check);bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry (struct inode *inode);void f2fs_do_read_inline_data (struct page *page,struct page *ipage); void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,
@@ -4141,6 +4141,19 @@ static inline void f2fs_set_encrypted_inode(struct inode *inode)#endif } +static inline bool f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk (struct inode *inode) +{ +/* +* used by sanity_check_inode(), when disk layout fields has not +* been synchronized to inmem fields. +*/ +if (S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && (file_is_encrypt (inode) || +F2FS_I (inode)->i_flags &F2FS_COMPR_FL || +file_is_verity (inode))) +return true; + +return false; +}/* * Returns true if the reads of the inode's data need to undergo some * postprocessing step, like decryption or authenticity verification.
fs/f2fs/file.c +1 -1
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ int f2fs_truncate(struct inode *inode)return err;/* we should check inline_data size */ -if (!f2fs_may_inline_data (inode)) { +if (!f2fs_may_inline_data (inode, false)) { err =f2fs_convert_inline_inode (inode);if (err)return err;
fs/f2fs/inline.c +8 -3
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@#include "node.h" #include <trace/events/f2fs.h> -bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode,bool sanity_check) {if (f2fs_is_atomic_file (inode))return false;
@@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)if (i_size_read (inode) >MAX_INLINE_DATA (inode))return false; -if (f2fs_post_read_required (inode)) -return false; +if (sanity_check) { +if (f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk (inode)) +return false; + }else { +if (f2fs_post_read_required (inode)) +return false; + }return true; }
fs/f2fs/inode.c +1 -2
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page) } } -if (f2fs_has_inline_data (inode) && - (!S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode))) { +if (f2fs_has_inline_data (inode) && !f2fs_may_inline_data (inode, true)) {set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_NEED_FSCK );f2fs_warn (sbi,"%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have inline_data, run fsck to fix" , __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);
fs/f2fs/namei.c +1 -1
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,if (test_opt (sbi,INLINE_XATTR ))set_inode_flag (inode,FI_INLINE_XATTR ); -if (test_opt (sbi,INLINE_DATA ) &&f2fs_may_inline_data (inode)) +if (test_opt (sbi,INLINE_DATA ) &&f2fs_may_inline_data (inode, false))set_inode_flag (inode,FI_INLINE_DATA );if (f2fs_may_inline_dentry (inode))set_inode_flag (inode,FI_INLINE_DENTRY );
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Jaegeuk Kim
maintainerQuoted 24 lines · Chao Yu
Yanming reported a kernel bug in Bugzilla kernel [1], which can be reproduced. The bug message is:
The kernel message is shown below:
kernel BUG at
fs/inode.c:611!Call Trace: evict+0x282/0x4e0 __dentry_kill+0x2b2/0x4d0 dput+0x2dd/0x720 do_renameat2+0x596/0x970 __x64_sys_rename+0x78/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215895
The bug is due to fuzzed inode has both
inline_dataand encrypted flags. Duringf2fs_evict_inode(), as the inode was deleted byrename(), it will cause inline data conversion due to conflicting flags. The page cache will be polluted and the panic will be triggered inclear_inode().Try fixing the bug by doing more sanity checks for inline data inode in
sanity_check_inode().
Quoted 6 lines
Reported-by Ming Yan <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>---
v4:
- introduce and usef2fs_post_read_required_ondisk()only for
Can we do like this?
--- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + fs/f2fs/inline.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +1 -0
@@ -4019,6 +4019,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;* inline.c */ bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode); +bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data (struct inode *inode);bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry (struct inode *inode);void f2fs_do_read_inline_data (struct page *page,struct page *ipage); void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,
fs/f2fs/inline.c +25 -5
@@ -14,21 +14,41 @@#include "node.h" #include <trace/events/f2fs.h> -bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +static bool support_inline_data (struct inode *inode) {if (f2fs_is_atomic_file (inode))return false; -if (!S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode))return false; -if (i_size_read (inode) >MAX_INLINE_DATA (inode))return false; +return true; +} -if (f2fs_post_read_required (inode)) +bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (!support_inline_data (inode))return false; -return true; +return !(f2fs_encrypted_file (inode) ||fsverity_active (inode) || +f2fs_compressed_file (inode)); +} + +bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (!f2fs_has_inline_data (inode)) +return false; + +if (!support_inline_data (inode)) +return true; + +/* +* used by sanity_check_inode(), when disk layout fields has not +* been synchronized to inmem fields. +*/ +return (S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && + (file_is_encrypt (inode) ||file_is_verity (inode) || + (F2FS_I (inode)->i_flags &F2FS_COMPR_FL ))); }bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry (struct inode *inode)
fs/f2fs/inode.c +1 -2
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page) } } -if (f2fs_has_inline_data (inode) && - (!S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode))) { +if (f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data (inode)) {set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_NEED_FSCK );f2fs_warn (sbi,"%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have inline_data, run fsck to fix" , __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);
Signature · 1 line
2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
Chao Yu
maintainerQuoted 73 lines · Jaegeuk Kim
Quoted 24 lines · Chao Yu
Yanming reported a kernel bug in Bugzilla kernel [1], which can be reproduced. The bug message is:
The kernel message is shown below:
kernel BUG at
fs/inode.c:611!Call Trace: evict+0x282/0x4e0 __dentry_kill+0x2b2/0x4d0 dput+0x2dd/0x720 do_renameat2+0x596/0x970 __x64_sys_rename+0x78/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215895
The bug is due to fuzzed inode has both
inline_dataand encrypted flags. Duringf2fs_evict_inode(), as the inode was deleted byrename(), it will cause inline data conversion due to conflicting flags. The page cache will be polluted and the panic will be triggered inclear_inode().Try fixing the bug by doing more sanity checks for inline data inode in
sanity_check_inode().Quoted 6 lines
Reported-by Ming Yan <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>---
v4:
- introduce and usef2fs_post_read_required_ondisk()only forCan we do like this?
--- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + fs/f2fs/inline.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +1
-0@@ -4019,6 +4019,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;* inline.c */ bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode); +bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data (struct inode *inode);bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry (struct inode *inode);void f2fs_do_read_inline_data (struct page *page,struct page *ipage); void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,fs/f2fs/inline.c +3
-3@@ -14,21 +14,41 @@#include "node.h" #include <trace/events/f2fs.h> -bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +static bool support_inline_data (struct inode *inode) {if (f2fs_is_atomic_file (inode))return false; -if (!S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode))return false; -if (i_size_read (inode) >MAX_INLINE_DATA (inode))return false; +return true; +}
fs/f2fs/inline.c line 34
Quoted 10 lines
fs/f2fs/inline.c +5
-2-if (f2fs_post_read_required (inode)) +bool f2fs_may_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (!support_inline_data (inode))return false; -return true; +return !(f2fs_encrypted_file (inode) ||fsverity_active (inode) || +f2fs_compressed_file (inode));
!f2fs_post_read_required(), otherwise looks good!
Thanks,
Quoted 25 lines
fs/f2fs/inline.c +17
-0+} + +bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (!f2fs_has_inline_data (inode)) +return false; + +if (!support_inline_data (inode)) +return true; + +/* +* used by sanity_check_inode(), when disk layout fields has not +* been synchronized to inmem fields. +*/ +return (S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && + (file_is_encrypt (inode) ||file_is_verity (inode) || + (F2FS_I (inode)->i_flags &F2FS_COMPR_FL ))); }bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry (struct inode *inode)fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0
fs/f2fs/inode.c static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page) · line 282
Quoted 9 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +1
-2@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page) } } -if (f2fs_has_inline_data (inode) && - (!S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode))) { +if (f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data (inode)) {set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_NEED_FSCK );f2fs_warn (sbi,"%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have inline_data, run fsck to fix" , __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel