5.18.9-rc1 review
Subsystems (2)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainercover 5.18.9-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.18.9-rc1
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
io_uring: fix not locked access to fixed buf table
Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete
Kees Cook <[email protected]>
hinic: Replace memcpy() with direct assignment
Coly Li <[email protected]>
bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()
Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: Drop boardfile probe path
Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++- arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++-- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2 ++ drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c | 25 ----------------- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 + drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 4 +-- fs/io_uring.c | 34 ++++++++++++----------- include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h | 11 -------- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 - 12 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 1/6 tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
From: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
commit 2390095113e98fc52fffe35c5206d30d9efe3f78 upstream.
EXPORT_SYMBOL and __init is a bad combination because the .init.text section is freed up after the initialization. Hence, modules cannot use symbols annotated __init. The access to a freed symbol may end up with kernel panic.
modpost used to detect it, but it had been broken for a decade.
Commit 28438794aba4 ("modpost: fix section mismatch check for exported init/exit sections") fixed it so modpost started to warn it again, then this showed up:
MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(___ksymtab_gpl+tick_nohz_full_setup+0x0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable __ksymtab_tick_nohz_full_setup to the function .init.text:tick_nohz_full_setup() The symbol tick_nohz_full_setup is exported and annotated __init
Fix this by removing the __init annotation of tick_nohz_full_setup or drop the export.
Drop the export because tick_nohz_full_setup() is only called from the built-in code in kernel/sched/isolation.c.
--- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
kernel/time/tick-sched.c +0 -1
@@ -526,7 +526,6 @@ void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumaskcpumask_copy (tick_nohz_full_mask, cpumask); tick_nohz_full_running = true; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (tick_nohz_full_setup);static int tick_nohz_cpu_down (unsigned int cpu) {
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 2/6 clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: Drop boardfile probe path
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
commit 41929c9f628b9990d33a200c54bb0c919e089aa8 upstream.
The boardfiles for IXP4xx have been deleted. Delete all the quirks and code dealing with that boot path and rely solely on device tree boot.
--- drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c | 25 ------------------------- include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h | 11 ----------- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 37 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h
drivers/clocksource/Kconfig +1 -1
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ config IXP4XX_TIMER bool "Intel XScale IXP4xx timer driver" if COMPILE_TEST depends on HAS_IOMEM select CLKSRC_MMIO - select TIMER_OF if OF + select TIMER_OF help Enables support for the Intel XScale IXP4xx SoC timer.
drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c +0 -25
@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/of_irq.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> -/* Goes away with OF conversion */ -#include <linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h> /* * Constants to make it easy to access Timer Control/Status registers
@@ -263,28 +261,6 @@ static struct platform_driver ixp4xx_tim };builtin_platform_driver (ixp4xx_timer_driver); -/** -* ixp4xx_timer_setup() - Timer setup function to be called from boardfiles -* @timerbase: physical base of timer block -* @timer_irq: Linux IRQ number for the timer -* @timer_freq: Fixed frequency of the timer -*/ -void __init ixp4xx_timer_setup (resource_size_t timerbase, -int timer_irq, -unsigned int timer_freq) -{ -void __iomem *base; - - base =ioremap (timerbase,0x100 ); -if (!base) { -pr_crit ("IXP4xx: can't remap timer\n" ); -return ; - } -ixp4xx_timer_register (base, timer_irq, timer_freq); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (ixp4xx_timer_setup); - -#ifdef CONFIG_OF static __init int ixp4xx_of_timer_init (struct device_node *np) {void __iomem *base;
@@ -315,4 +291,3 @@ out_unmap:return ret; }TIMER_OF_DECLARE (ixp4xx,"intel,ixp4xx-timer" , ixp4xx_of_timer_init); -#endif
include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h deleted +0 -11
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ -#ifndef __TIMER_IXP4XX_H -#define __TIMER_IXP4XX_H - -#include <linux/ioport.h> - -void __init ixp4xx_timer_setup (resource_size_t timerbase, -int timer_irq, -unsigned int timer_freq); - -#endif
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 3/6 bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Coly Li <[email protected]>
commit 7d6b902ea0e02b2a25c480edf471cbaa4ebe6b3c upstream.
The local variables check_state (in bch_btree_check()) and state (in bch_sectors_dirty_init()) should be fully filled by 0, because before allocating them on stack, they were dynamically allocated by kzalloc().
--- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 + drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c +1 -0
@@ -2017,6 +2017,7 @@ int bch_btree_check(struct cache_set *c)if (c->root->level ==0 )return 0 ; +memset (&check_state,0 ,sizeof (struct btree_check_state )); check_state.c = c; check_state.total_threads =bch_btree_chkthread_nr (); check_state.key_idx =0 ;
drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c +1 -0
@@ -950,6 +950,7 @@ void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcachreturn ; } +memset (&state,0 ,sizeof (struct bch_dirty_init_state )); state.c = c; state.d = d; state.total_threads =bch_btre_dirty_init_thread_nr ();
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 4/6 hinic: Replace memcpy() with direct assignment
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
commit 1e70212e031528918066a631c9fdccda93a1ffaa upstream.
Under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y and CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y, Clang is bugged here for calculating the size of the destination buffer (0x10 instead of 0x14). This copy is a fixed size (sizeof(struct fw_section_info_st)), with the source and dest being struct fw_section_info_st, so the memcpy should be safe, assuming the index is within bounds, which is UBSAN_BOUNDS's responsibility to figure out.
Avoid the whole thing and just do a direct assignment. This results in no change to the executable code.
[This is a duplicate of commit 2c0ab32b73cf ("hinic: Replace memcpy()
with direct assignment") which was applied to net-next.]
--- drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c +1 -3
@@ -43,9 +43,7 @@ static bool check_image_valid(struct hinfor (i =0 ; i < fw_image->fw_info.fw_section_cnt; i++) { len += fw_image->fw_section_info[i].fw_section_len; -memcpy (&host_image->image_section_info[i], - &fw_image->fw_section_info[i], -sizeof (struct fw_section_info_st )); + host_image->image_section_info[i] = fw_image->fw_section_info[i]; } if (len != fw_image->fw_len ||
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 5/6 powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
commit 84ade0a6655bee803d176525ef457175cbf4df22 upstream.
Stop using the ftrace trampoline for init section once kernel init is complete.
--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 +++- arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h +3 -1
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static inline bool arch_syscall_match_sy#endif /* PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 */ #endif /* CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS */ -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64 ) && defined(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER )#include <asm/paca.h> static inline void this_cpu_disable_ftrace (void )
@@ -110,11 +110,13 @@ static inline u8 this_cpu_get_ftrace_enareturn get_paca ()->ftrace_enabled; } +void ftrace_free_init_tramp (void );#else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ static inline void this_cpu_disable_ftrace (void ) { }static inline void this_cpu_enable_ftrace (void ) { }static inline void this_cpu_set_ftrace_enabled (u8 ftrace_enabled) { }static inline u8 this_cpu_get_ftrace_enabled (void ) {return 1 ; } +static inline void ftrace_free_init_tramp (void ) { }#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +12 -3
@@ -306,9 +306,7 @@ static int setup_mcount_compiler_tramp(u/* Is this a known long jump tramp? */ for (i =0 ; i <NUM_FTRACE_TRAMPS ; i++) -if (!ftrace_tramps[i]) -break ; -else if (ftrace_tramps[i] == tramp) +if (ftrace_tramps[i] == tramp)return 0 ;/* Is this a known plt tramp? */
@@ -863,6 +861,17 @@ void arch_ftrace_update_code(int commandextern unsigned int ftrace_tramp_text[], ftrace_tramp_init[]; +void ftrace_free_init_tramp (void ) +{ +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <NUM_FTRACE_TRAMPS && ftrace_tramps[i]; i++) +if (ftrace_tramps[i] == (unsigned long )ftrace_tramp_init) { + ftrace_tramps[i] =0 ; +return ; + } +} +int __init ftrace_dyn_arch_init (void ) {int i;
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c +2 -0
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@#include <asm/kasan.h> #include <asm/svm.h> #include <asm/mmzone.h> +#include <asm/ftrace.h> #include <mm/mmu_decl.h>
@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ void free_initmem(void) ppc_md.progress = ppc_printk_progress;mark_initmem_nx ();free_initmem_default (POISON_FREE_INITMEM ); +ftrace_free_init_tramp (); }/*
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 6/6 io_uring: fix not locked access to fixed buf table
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
commit 05b538c1765f8d14a71ccf5f85258dcbeaf189f7 upstream.
We can look inside the fixed buffer table only while holding ->uring_lock, however in some cases we don't do the right async prep for IORING_OP_{WRITE,READ}_FIXED ending up with NULL req->imu forcing making an io-wq worker to try to resolve the fixed buffer without proper locking.
Move req->imu setup into early req init paths, i.e. io_prep_rw(), which is called unconditionally for rw requests and under uring_lock.
--- fs/io_uring.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
fs/io_uring.c +18 -16
@@ -3187,6 +3187,21 @@ static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *rint ret; kiocb->ki_pos =READ_ONCE (sqe->off); +/* used for fixed read/write too - just read unconditionally */ + req->buf_index =READ_ONCE (sqe->buf_index); + req->imu =NULL ; + +if (req->opcode ==IORING_OP_READ_FIXED || + req->opcode ==IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED ) { +struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; +u16 index; + +if (unlikely (req->buf_index >= ctx->nr_user_bufs)) +return -EFAULT ; + index =array_index_nospec (req->buf_index, ctx->nr_user_bufs); + req->imu = ctx->user_bufs[index]; +io_req_set_rsrc_node (req, ctx,0 ); + } ioprio =READ_ONCE (sqe->ioprio);if (ioprio) {
@@ -3199,11 +3214,9 @@ static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *r kiocb->ki_ioprio =get_current_ioprio (); } - req->imu =NULL ; req->rw.addr =READ_ONCE (sqe->addr); req->rw.len =READ_ONCE (sqe->len); req->rw.flags =READ_ONCE (sqe->rw_flags); - req->buf_index =READ_ONCE (sqe->buf_index);return 0 ; }
@@ -3335,20 +3348,9 @@ static int __io_import_fixed(struct io_kstatic int io_import_fixed (struct io_kiocb *req,int rw,struct iov_iter *iter,unsigned int issue_flags) { -struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu = req->imu; -u16 index, buf_index = req->buf_index; - -if (likely (!imu)) { -struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; - -if (unlikely (buf_index >= ctx->nr_user_bufs)) -return -EFAULT ; -io_req_set_rsrc_node (req, ctx, issue_flags); - index =array_index_nospec (buf_index, ctx->nr_user_bufs); - imu =READ_ONCE (ctx->user_bufs[index]); - req->imu = imu; - } -return __io_import_fixed (req, rw, iter, imu); +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!req->imu)) +return -EFAULT ; +return __io_import_fixed (req, rw, iter, req->imu); }static void io_ring_submit_unlock (struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,bool needs_lock)
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.18:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
130 tests: 130 pass, 0 failLinux version: 5.18.9-rc1-g2c9a64b3a872
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04Jon
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7 No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.427 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 10.046 [sec]
10.046035 usecs/op
99541 ops/secThanks
-Zan
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Signature · 1 line
Florian
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Guenter
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build
* kernel: 5.18.9-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.18.y
* git commit: 2c9a64b3a872fb2818d217509b16e61ba54c365e
* git describe: v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.8)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.8)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.8)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.8)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 120950, pass: 109794, fail: 546, skip: 9999, xfail: 611
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 307 total, 307 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o
CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
| ^~~~~The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit 421ef3d56513b2).
Signature · 1 line
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 20 lines · Bagas Sanjaya
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (
bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~
Quoted 3 lines
The culprit is commit
2340f1adf9fbb3("cifs: don't callcifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk()if nodfs was set") (upstream commit421ef3d56513b2).
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
But until then, no need to report anything here, as there's nothing I can do.
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 4 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
OK.
I also tried building the mainline (with ppc64_defconfig), no warnings reported.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Quoted 21 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 20 lines · Bagas Sanjaya
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (
bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The culprit is commit
2340f1adf9fbb3("cifs: don't callcifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk()if nodfs was set") (upstream commit421ef3d56513b2).Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")
--
Regards
Sudip
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 26 lines · Sudip Mukherjee
Quoted 25 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 23 lines · Bagas Sanjaya
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (
bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~The culprit is commit
2340f1adf9fbb3("cifs: don't callcifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk()if nodfs was set") (upstream commit421ef3d56513b2).
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
93ed91c020aa("cifs: fix minor compile warning")
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220627):
mips: 59 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failurex86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1431
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1438
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1440
--
Regards
Sudip
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.18.8-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
--
Rudi
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
resend:
5.18.9-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
--
Rudi
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.