Mutex wrapper, locking and memory leak fixes
Subsystems (3)
Ian Rogers
reviewerv4 cover Mutex wrapper, locking and memory leak fixes
When fixing a locking race and memory leak in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/[email protected]/
It was requested that debug mutex code be separated out into its own files. This was, in part, done by Pavithra Gurushankar in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
These patches fix issues with the previous patches, add in the original dso->nsinfo fix and then build on our mutex wrapper with clang's -Wthread-safety analysis. The analysis found missing unlocks in builtin-sched.c which are fixed and -Wthread-safety is enabled by default when building with clang.
v4. Adds a comment for the trylock result, fixes the new line (missed
in v3) and removes two blank lines as suggested by Adrian Hunter.
v3. Adds a missing new line to the error messages and removes the
pshared argument to mutex_init by having two functions, mutex_init and mutex_init_pshared. These changes were suggested by Adrian Hunter.
v2. Breaks apart changes that s/pthread_mutex/mutex/g and the lock
annotations as requested by Arnaldo and Namhyung. A boolean is added to builtin-sched.c to terminate thread funcs rather than leaving them blocked on delted mutexes.
Ian Rogers (17):
perf bench: Update use of pthread mutex/cond
perf tests: Avoid pthread.h inclusion
perf hist: Update use of pthread mutex
perf bpf: Remove unused pthread.h include
perf lock: Remove unused pthread.h include
perf record: Update use of pthread mutex
perf sched: Update use of pthread mutex
perf ui: Update use of pthread mutex
perf mmap: Remove unnecessary pthread.h include
perf dso: Update use of pthread mutex
perf annotate: Update use of pthread mutex
perf top: Update use of pthread mutex
perf dso: Hold lock when accessing nsinfo
perf mutex: Add thread safety annotations
perf sched: Fixes for thread safety analysis
perf top: Fixes for thread safety analysis
perf build: Enable -Wthread-safety with clang
Pavithra Gurushankar (1):
perf mutex: Wrapped usage of mutex and cond
tools/perf/Makefile.config | 5 + tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/futex-requeue.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/futex-wake-parallel.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/futex-wake.c | 33 +++--- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 93 ++++++---------- tools/perf/builtin-inject.c | 4 + tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 1 - tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 13 ++- tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 105 +++++++++--------- tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 45 ++++---- tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c | 2 - tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c | 2 +- tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c | 2 - tools/perf/ui/browser.c | 20 ++-- tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c | 12 +-- tools/perf/ui/setup.c | 5 +- tools/perf/ui/tui/helpline.c | 5 +- tools/perf/ui/tui/progress.c | 8 +- tools/perf/ui/tui/setup.c | 8 +- tools/perf/ui/tui/util.c | 18 ++-- tools/perf/ui/ui.h | 4 +- tools/perf/util/Build | 1 + tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 +-- tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 4 +- tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h | 1 - tools/perf/util/build-id.c | 12 ++- tools/perf/util/dso.c | 19 ++-- tools/perf/util/dso.h | 4 +- tools/perf/util/hist.c | 6 +- tools/perf/util/hist.h | 4 +- tools/perf/util/map.c | 3 + tools/perf/util/mmap.h | 1 - tools/perf/util/mutex.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/mutex.h | 108 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 3 + tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 4 +- tools/perf/util/top.h | 5 +- 41 files changed, 569 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/mutex.c create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/mutex.h
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Ian Rogers
reviewerPATCH v4 1/18 perf mutex: Wrapped usage of mutex and cond
From: Pavithra Gurushankar <[email protected]>
Added a new header file mutex.h that wraps the usage of pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t. By abstracting these it is possible to introduce error checking.
--- tools/perf/util/Build | 1 + tools/perf/util/mutex.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/mutex.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/mutex.c create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/mutex.h
tools/perf/util/Build +1 -0
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ perf-y += branch.o perf-y += mem2node.o perf-y += clockid.o perf-y += list_sort.o +perf-y += mutex.o perf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf-loader.o perf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf_map.o
tools/perf/util/mutex.c new file +117 -0
117 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/perf/util/mutex.h new file +48 -0
48 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Ian Rogers
reviewerPATCH v4 2/18 perf bench: Update use of pthread mutex/cond
In reply to Ian RogersSwitch to the use of mutex wrappers that provide better error checking.
--- tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/futex-requeue.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/futex-wake-parallel.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/futex-wake.c | 33 ++++----- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 93 ++++++++++---------------- 8 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c +17 -16
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@#include <sys/eventfd.h> #include <perf/cpumap.h> +#include "../util/mutex.h" #include "../util/stat.h" #include <subcmd/parse-options.h> #include "bench.h"
@@ -58,10 +59,10 @@ static unsigned int nested = 0;/* amount of fds to monitor, per thread */ static unsigned int nfds =64 ; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; +static struct mutex thread_lock;static unsigned int threads_starting;static struct stats all_stats[EPOLL_NR_OPS ]; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;struct worker {int tid;
@@ -174,12 +175,12 @@ static void *workerfn(void *arg)struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec =0 , .tv_nsec =250 }; -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);/* Let 'em loose */ do {
@@ -367,9 +368,9 @@ int bench_epoll_ctl(int argc, const char **argv)for (i =0 ; i <EPOLL_NR_OPS ; i++)init_stats (&all_stats[i]); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker); threads_starting = nthreads;
@@ -377,11 +378,11 @@ int bench_epoll_ctl(int argc, const char **argv)do_threads (worker, cpu); -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);sleep (nsecs);toggle_done (0 ,NULL ,NULL );
@@ -394,9 +395,9 @@ int bench_epoll_ctl(int argc, const char **argv) }/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);for (i =0 ; i < nthreads; i++) {unsigned long t[EPOLL_NR_OPS ];
tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c +17 -16
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@#include <perf/cpumap.h> #include "../util/stat.h" +#include "../util/mutex.h" #include <subcmd/parse-options.h> #include "bench.h"
@@ -109,10 +110,10 @@ static bool multiq; /* use an epoll instance per thread *//* amount of fds to monitor, per thread */ static unsigned int nfds =64 ; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; +static struct mutex thread_lock;static unsigned int threads_starting;static struct stats throughput_stats; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;struct worker {int tid;
@@ -189,12 +190,12 @@ static void *workerfn(void *arg)int to = nonblocking?0 :-1 ;int efd = multiq ? w->epollfd : epollfd; -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); do { /*
@@ -485,9 +486,9 @@ int bench_epoll_wait(int argc, const char **argv) getpid(), nthreads, oneshot ? " (EPOLLONESHOT semantics)": "", nfds, nsecs);init_stats (&throughput_stats); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker); threads_starting = nthreads;
@@ -495,11 +496,11 @@ int bench_epoll_wait(int argc, const char **argv)do_threads (worker, cpu); -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);/* * At this point the workers should be blocked waiting for read events
@@ -522,9 +523,9 @@ int bench_epoll_wait(int argc, const char **argv)err (EXIT_FAILURE ,"pthread_join" );/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);/* sort the array back before reporting */ if (randomize)
tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c +17 -16
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@#include <sys/mman.h> #include <perf/cpumap.h> +#include "../util/mutex.h" #include "../util/stat.h" #include <subcmd/parse-options.h> #include "bench.h"
@@ -34,10 +35,10 @@ static bool done = false;static int futex_flag =0 ;struct timeval bench__start, bench__end, bench__runtime; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; +static struct mutex thread_lock;static unsigned int threads_starting;static struct stats throughput_stats; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;struct worker {int tid;
@@ -73,12 +74,12 @@ static void *workerfn(void *arg)unsigned int i;unsigned long ops = w->ops;/* avoid cacheline bouncing */ -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); do { for (i = 0; i < params.nfutexes; i++, ops++) {
@@ -165,9 +166,9 @@ int bench_futex_hash(int argc, const char **argv) getpid(), params.nthreads, params.nfutexes, params.fshared ? "shared":"private", params.runtime);init_stats (&throughput_stats); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker); threads_starting = params.nthreads;pthread_attr_init (&thread_attr);
@@ -203,11 +204,11 @@ int bench_futex_hash(int argc, const char **argv)CPU_FREE (cpuset);pthread_attr_destroy (&thread_attr); -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);sleep (params.runtime);toggle_done (0 ,NULL ,NULL );
@@ -219,9 +220,9 @@ int bench_futex_hash(int argc, const char **argv) }/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);for (i =0 ; i < params.nthreads; i++) { unsigned long t = bench__runtime.tv_sec > 0 ?
tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c +17 -16
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@#include <pthread.h> #include <signal.h> +#include "../util/mutex.h" #include "../util/stat.h" #include <subcmd/parse-options.h> #include <linux/compiler.h>
@@ -34,10 +35,10 @@ static u_int32_t global_futex = 0;static struct worker *worker;static bool done = false;static int futex_flag =0 ; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; +static struct mutex thread_lock;static unsigned int threads_starting;static struct stats throughput_stats; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;static struct bench_futex_parameters params = { .runtime =10 ,
@@ -83,12 +84,12 @@ static void *workerfn(void *arg)struct worker *w = (struct worker *) arg;unsigned long ops = w->ops; -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); do { int ret;
@@ -197,9 +198,9 @@ int bench_futex_lock_pi(int argc, const char **argv) getpid(), params.nthreads, params.runtime);init_stats (&throughput_stats); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker); threads_starting = params.nthreads;pthread_attr_init (&thread_attr);
@@ -208,11 +209,11 @@ int bench_futex_lock_pi(int argc, const char **argv)create_threads (worker, thread_attr, cpu);pthread_attr_destroy (&thread_attr); -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);sleep (params.runtime);toggle_done (0 ,NULL ,NULL );
@@ -224,9 +225,9 @@ int bench_futex_lock_pi(int argc, const char **argv) }/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);for (i =0 ; i < params.nthreads; i++) { unsigned long t = bench__runtime.tv_sec > 0 ?
tools/perf/bench/futex-requeue.c +17 -16
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#include <pthread.h> #include <signal.h> +#include "../util/mutex.h" #include "../util/stat.h" #include <subcmd/parse-options.h> #include <linux/compiler.h>
@@ -34,8 +35,8 @@ static u_int32_t futex1 = 0, futex2 = 0;static pthread_t *worker;static bool done = false; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct mutex thread_lock; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;static struct stats requeuetime_stats, requeued_stats;static unsigned int threads_starting;static int futex_flag =0 ;
@@ -82,12 +83,12 @@ static void *workerfn(void *arg __maybe_unused) {int ret; -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);while (1 ) {if (!params.pi) {
@@ -209,9 +210,9 @@ int bench_futex_requeue(int argc, const char **argv)init_stats (&requeued_stats);init_stats (&requeuetime_stats);pthread_attr_init (&thread_attr); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker);for (j =0 ; j < bench_repeat && !done; j++) {unsigned int nrequeued =0 , wakeups =0 ;
@@ -221,11 +222,11 @@ int bench_futex_requeue(int argc, const char **argv)block_threads (worker, thread_attr, cpu);/* make sure all threads are already blocked */ -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);usleep (100000 );
@@ -297,9 +298,9 @@ int bench_futex_requeue(int argc, const char **argv) }/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);pthread_attr_destroy (&thread_attr);print_summary ();
tools/perf/bench/futex-wake-parallel.c +17 -16
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#include "bench.h" #include <linux/compiler.h> #include "../util/debug.h" +#include "../util/mutex.h" #ifndef HAVE_PTHREAD_BARRIER int bench_futex_wake_parallel (int argc__maybe_unused ,const char **argv__maybe_unused )
@@ -49,8 +50,8 @@ static u_int32_t futex = 0;static pthread_t *blocked_worker;static bool done = false; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct mutex thread_lock; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;static pthread_barrier_t barrier;static struct stats waketime_stats, wakeup_stats;static unsigned int threads_starting;
@@ -125,12 +126,12 @@ static void wakeup_threads(struct thread_data *td, pthread_attr_t thread_attr)static void *blocked_workerfn (void *arg__maybe_unused ) { -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);while (1 ) {/* handle spurious wakeups */ if (futex_wait (&futex,0 ,NULL , futex_flag) !=EINTR )
@@ -294,9 +295,9 @@ int bench_futex_wake_parallel(int argc, const char **argv)init_stats (&waketime_stats);pthread_attr_init (&thread_attr); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker);for (j =0 ; j < bench_repeat && !done; j++) { waking_worker =calloc (params.nwakes,sizeof (*waking_worker));
@@ -307,11 +308,11 @@ int bench_futex_wake_parallel(int argc, const char **argv)block_threads (blocked_worker, thread_attr, cpu);/* make sure all threads are already blocked */ -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);usleep (100000 );
@@ -332,9 +333,9 @@ int bench_futex_wake_parallel(int argc, const char **argv) }/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);pthread_attr_destroy (&thread_attr);print_summary ();
tools/perf/bench/futex-wake.c +17 -16
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@#include <pthread.h> #include <signal.h> +#include "../util/mutex.h" #include "../util/stat.h" #include <subcmd/parse-options.h> #include <linux/compiler.h>
@@ -34,8 +35,8 @@ static u_int32_t futex1 = 0;static pthread_t *worker;static bool done = false; -static pthread_mutex_t thread_lock; -static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker; +static struct mutex thread_lock; +static struct cond thread_parent, thread_worker;static struct stats waketime_stats, wakeup_stats;static unsigned int threads_starting;static int futex_flag =0 ;
@@ -65,12 +66,12 @@ static const char * const bench_futex_wake_usage[] = {static void *workerfn (void *arg__maybe_unused ) { -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock); threads_starting--;if (!threads_starting) -pthread_cond_signal (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_signal (&thread_parent); +cond_wait (&thread_worker, &thread_lock); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);while (1 ) {if (futex_wait (&futex1,0 ,NULL , futex_flag) !=EINTR )
@@ -178,9 +179,9 @@ int bench_futex_wake(int argc, const char **argv)init_stats (&wakeup_stats);init_stats (&waketime_stats);pthread_attr_init (&thread_attr); -pthread_mutex_init (&thread_lock,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_parent,NULL ); -pthread_cond_init (&thread_worker,NULL ); +mutex_init (&thread_lock); +cond_init (&thread_parent); +cond_init (&thread_worker);for (j =0 ; j < bench_repeat && !done; j++) {unsigned int nwoken =0 ;
@@ -190,11 +191,11 @@ int bench_futex_wake(int argc, const char **argv)block_threads (worker, thread_attr, cpu);/* make sure all threads are already blocked */ -pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_lock); +mutex_lock (&thread_lock);while (threads_starting) -pthread_cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); -pthread_cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&thread_lock); +cond_wait (&thread_parent, &thread_lock); +cond_broadcast (&thread_worker); +mutex_unlock (&thread_lock);usleep (100000 );
@@ -224,9 +225,9 @@ int bench_futex_wake(int argc, const char **argv) }/* cleanup & report results */ -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_parent); -pthread_cond_destroy (&thread_worker); -pthread_mutex_destroy (&thread_lock); +cond_destroy (&thread_parent); +cond_destroy (&thread_worker); +mutex_destroy (&thread_lock);pthread_attr_destroy (&thread_attr);print_summary ();
tools/perf/bench/numa.c +34 -59
201 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Ian Rogers
reviewerPATCH v4 3/18 perf tests: Avoid pthread.h inclusion
In reply to Ian Rogerspthread.h is being included for the side-effect of getting sched.h and macros like CPU_CLR. Switch to directly using sched.h, or if that is already present, just remove the pthread.h inclusion entirely.
--- tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c | 2 -- tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c | 2 +- tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c | 2 -- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c +0 -2
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 #include <errno.h> #include <inttypes.h> -/* For the CLR_() macros */ -#include <pthread.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <perf/cpumap.h>
tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c +1 -1
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@#include <errno.h> #include <inttypes.h> /* For the CPU_* macros */ -#include <pthread.h> +#include <sched.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h>
tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c +0 -2
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@#include <errno.h> #include <inttypes.h> #include <linux/string.h> -/* For the CLR_() macros */ -#include <pthread.h> #include <sched.h> #include <perf/mmap.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Ian Rogers
reviewerPATCH v4 4/18 perf hist: Update use of pthread mutex
In reply to Ian RogersSwitch to the use of mutex wrappers that provide better error checking.
--- tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 ++++---- tools/perf/util/hist.c | 6 +++--- tools/perf/util/hist.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
tools/perf/builtin-top.c +4 -4
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void perf_top__record_precise_ip(struct perf_top *top,* This function is now called with he->hists->lock held. * Release it before going to sleep. */ -pthread_mutex_unlock (&he->hists->lock); +mutex_unlock (&he->hists->lock);if (err == -ERANGE && !he->ms.map->erange_warned)ui__warn_map_erange (he->ms.map, sym, ip);
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void perf_top__record_precise_ip(struct perf_top *top,sleep (1 ); } -pthread_mutex_lock (&he->hists->lock); +mutex_lock (&he->hists->lock); } }
@@ -836,12 +836,12 @@ static void perf_event__process_sample(struct perf_tool *tool,else iter.ops = &hist_iter_normal; -pthread_mutex_lock (&hists->lock); +mutex_lock (&hists->lock);if (hist_entry_iter__add (&iter, &al, top->max_stack, top) <0 )pr_err ("Problem incrementing symbol period, skipping event\n" ); -pthread_mutex_unlock (&hists->lock); +mutex_unlock (&hists->lock); }addr_location__put (&al);
tools/perf/util/hist.c +3 -3
@@ -1622,13 +1622,13 @@ struct rb_root_cached *hists__get_rotate_entries_in(struct hists *hists) {struct rb_root_cached *root; -pthread_mutex_lock (&hists->lock); +mutex_lock (&hists->lock); root = hists->entries_in;if (++hists->entries_in > &hists->entries_in_array[1 ]) hists->entries_in = &hists->entries_in_array[0 ]; -pthread_mutex_unlock (&hists->lock); +mutex_unlock (&hists->lock);return root; }
@@ -2805,7 +2805,7 @@ int __hists__init(struct hists *hists, struct perf_hpp_list *hpp_list) hists->entries_in = &hists->entries_in_array[0 ]; hists->entries_collapsed =RB_ROOT_CACHED ; hists->entries =RB_ROOT_CACHED ; -pthread_mutex_init (&hists->lock,NULL ); +mutex_init (&hists->lock); hists->socket_filter =-1 ; hists->hpp_list = hpp_list;INIT_LIST_HEAD (&hists->hpp_formats);
tools/perf/util/hist.h +2 -2
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@#include <linux/rbtree.h> #include <linux/types.h> -#include <pthread.h> #include "evsel.h" #include "color.h" #include "events_stats.h" +#include "mutex.h" struct hist_entry ;struct hist_entry_ops ;
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct hists {const struct dso *dso_filter;const char *uid_filter_str;const char *symbol_filter_str; -pthread_mutex_t lock; +struct mutex lock;struct hists_stats stats;u64 event_stream;u16 col_len[HISTC_NR_COLS ];
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Ian Rogers
reviewerPATCH v4 5/18 perf bpf: Remove unused pthread.h include
In reply to Ian RogersNo pthread usage in bpf-event.h.
--- tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h +0 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/rbtree.h> -#include <pthread.h> #include <api/fd/array.h> #include <stdio.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Quoted 42 lines · Ian Rogers
When fixing a locking race and memory leak in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/[email protected]/It was requested that debug mutex code be separated out into its own files. This was, in part, done by Pavithra Gurushankar in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/These patches fix issues with the previous patches, add in the original
dso->nsinfofix and then build on our mutex wrapper with clang's -Wthread-safety analysis. The analysis found missing unlocks inbuiltin-sched.cwhich are fixed and -Wthread-safety is enabled by default when building with clang.v4. Adds a comment for the trylock result, fixes the new line (missed
in v3) and removes two blank lines as suggested by Adrian Hunter.
v3. Adds a missing new line to the error messages and removes the
pshared argument tomutex_initby having two functions,mutex_initandmutex_init_pshared. These changes were suggested by Adrian Hunter.
v2. Breaks apart changes that s/pthread_mutex/mutex/g and the lock
annotations as requested by Arnaldo and Namhyung. A boolean is added tobuiltin-sched.cto terminate thread funcs rather than leaving them blocked on delted mutexes.Ian Rogers (17):
perf bench: Update use of pthread mutex/cond
perf tests: Avoidpthread.hinclusion
perf hist: Update use of pthread mutex
perf bpf: Remove unusedpthread.hinclude
perf lock: Remove unusedpthread.hinclude
perf record: Update use of pthread mutex
perf sched: Update use of pthread mutex
perf ui: Update use of pthread mutex
perf mmap: Remove unnecessarypthread.hinclude
perf dso: Update use of pthread mutex
perf annotate: Update use of pthread mutex
perf top: Update use of pthread mutex
perf dso: Hold lock when accessing nsinfo
perf mutex: Add thread safety annotations
perf sched: Fixes for thread safety analysis
perf top: Fixes for thread safety analysis
perf build: Enable -Wthread-safety with clang
Quoted 2 lines
Pavithra Gurushankar (1):
perf mutex: Wrapped usage of mutex and cond
For all patches except 9 and 16
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
maintainerEm Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 10:04:44AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
Quoted 43 lines · Ian Rogers
Quoted 42 lines
When fixing a locking race and memory leak in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/[email protected]/It was requested that debug mutex code be separated out into its own files. This was, in part, done by Pavithra Gurushankar in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/These patches fix issues with the previous patches, add in the original
dso->nsinfofix and then build on our mutex wrapper with clang's -Wthread-safety analysis. The analysis found missing unlocks inbuiltin-sched.cwhich are fixed and -Wthread-safety is enabled by default when building with clang.v4. Adds a comment for the trylock result, fixes the new line (missed
in v3) and removes two blank lines as suggested by Adrian Hunter.
v3. Adds a missing new line to the error messages and removes the
pshared argument tomutex_initby having two functions,mutex_initandmutex_init_pshared. These changes were suggested by Adrian Hunter.
v2. Breaks apart changes that s/pthread_mutex/mutex/g and the lock
annotations as requested by Arnaldo and Namhyung. A boolean is added tobuiltin-sched.cto terminate thread funcs rather than leaving them blocked on delted mutexes.Ian Rogers (17):
perf bench: Update use of pthread mutex/cond
perf tests: Avoidpthread.hinclusion
perf hist: Update use of pthread mutex
perf bpf: Remove unusedpthread.hinclude
perf lock: Remove unusedpthread.hinclude
perf record: Update use of pthread mutex
perf sched: Update use of pthread mutex
perf ui: Update use of pthread mutex
perf mmap: Remove unnecessarypthread.hinclude
perf dso: Update use of pthread mutex
perf annotate: Update use of pthread mutex
perf top: Update use of pthread mutex
perf dso: Hold lock when accessing nsinfo
perf mutex: Add thread safety annotations
perf sched: Fixes for thread safety analysis
perf top: Fixes for thread safety analysis
perf build: Enable -Wthread-safety with clang
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Pavithra Gurushankar (1):
perf mutex: Wrapped usage of mutex and condFor all patches except 9 and 16
Reviewed-by Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Added it, did the usual round of tests and pushed out perf/core, we can continue from there.
It also contains Adrian's "multiple recording time ranges" series.
Thanks!
- Arnaldo