Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Input: iqs7211 - point to match data directly

PATCH Superseded Jeff LaBundy 2 participants 3 messages Jul 13, 2023

Subsystems (2)

v1 of 2 Superseded Latest is v2 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Input: iqs7211 - point to match data directly

Point the OF match table directly to the struct that describes the device as opposed to an intermediate enum; doing so simplifies the code and avoids a clang warning.

As part of this change, the I2C device ID table is removed, as the device cannot probe without an OF node due to the unique nature of the hardware's interrupt pin.

Fixes f2ba47e65f3b ("Input: add support for Azoteq IQS7210A/7211A/E")
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c +7 -19
index f60316d37f45..d41bbdd096e7 100644
@@ -2420,33 +2420,24 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(iqs7211);
 static const struct of_device_id iqs7211_of_match[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "azoteq,iqs7210a",
-		.data = (void *)IQS7210A,
+		.data = &iqs7211_devs[IQS7210A],
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "azoteq,iqs7211a",
-		.data = (void *)IQS7211A,
+		.data = &iqs7211_devs[IQS7211A],
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "azoteq,iqs7211e",
-		.data = (void *)IQS7211E,
+		.data = &iqs7211_devs[IQS7211E],
 	},
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, iqs7211_of_match);
 
-static const struct i2c_device_id iqs7211_id[] = {
-	{ "iqs7210a", IQS7210A },
-	{ "iqs7211a", IQS7211A },
-	{ "iqs7211e", IQS7211E },
-	{ }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, iqs7211_id);
-
 static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct iqs7211_private *iqs7211;
 	enum iqs7211_reg_grp_id reg_grp;
-	enum iqs7211_dev_id dev_id;
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
 	bool shared_irq;
 	int error, irq;
@@ -2460,13 +2451,11 @@ static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iqs7211->reg_field_head);
 
-	if (client->dev.of_node)
-		dev_id = (enum iqs7211_dev_id)of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
-	else
-		dev_id = i2c_match_id(iqs7211_id, client)->driver_data;
+	iqs7211->dev_desc = of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
+	if (!iqs7211->dev_desc)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
-	shared_irq = iqs7211_devs[dev_id].num_ctx == IQS7211_MAX_CTX;
-	iqs7211->dev_desc = &iqs7211_devs[dev_id];
+	shared_irq = iqs7211->dev_desc->num_ctx == IQS7211_MAX_CTX;
 
 	/*
 	 * The RDY pin behaves as an interrupt, but must also be polled ahead
@@ -2554,7 +2543,6 @@ static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 static struct i2c_driver iqs7211_i2c_driver = {
 	.probe = iqs7211_probe,
-	.id_table = iqs7211_id,
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "iqs7211",
 		.of_match_table = iqs7211_of_match,
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
maintainer
#1 lore raw

Hi Jeff,

drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client) · line 2454

Quoted 9 lines · Jeff LaBundy
drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c +1 -4
@@ -2460,13 +2451,11 @@ static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iqs7211->reg_field_head);
 
-	if (client->dev.of_node)
-		dev_id = (enum iqs7211_dev_id)of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
-	else
-		dev_id = i2c_match_id(iqs7211_id, client)->driver_data;
+	iqs7211->dev_desc = of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);

Can we make it device_get_match_data() instead of using OF-specific variant?

Thanks.

Signature · 1 line
Dmitry
#2 lore raw

Hi Dmitry,

Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Torokhov

Hi Jeff,

Quoted 4 lines · Jeff LaBundy
drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c +0 -0
@@ -2460,13 +2451,11 @@ static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iqs7211->reg_field_head);
 
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c static int iqs7211_probe(struct i2c_client *client) · line 2454

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/input/touchscreen/iqs7211.c +1 -4
-	if (client->dev.of_node)
-		dev_id = (enum iqs7211_dev_id)of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
-	else
-		dev_id = i2c_match_id(iqs7211_id, client)->driver_data;
+	iqs7211->dev_desc = of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);

Can we make it device_get_match_data() instead of using OF-specific variant?

Ah yes, good catch; I'll fix that.

Quoted 5 lines

Thanks.

Signature · 1 line
Dmitry

Kind regards,
Jeff LaBundy