6.8.4-rc1 review
Subsystems (2)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainercover 6.8.4-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 6.8.4-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: RCU protect wq->dfl_pwq and implement accessors for it"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Don't call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "workqueue: Shorten events_freezable_power_efficient name"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- include/linux/workqueue.h | 35 +-- kernel/workqueue.c | 757 ++++++++-------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 664 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 1/11 Revert "workqueue: Shorten events_freezable_power_efficient name"
6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit fb89c8fa412f6caa34316c140e861bd3c4d7e83a which is commit 8318d6a6362f5903edb4c904a8dd447e59be4ad1 upstream
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +1 -1
@@ -7186,7 +7186,7 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void) WQ_FREEZABLE, 0); system_power_efficient_wq =alloc_workqueue ("events_power_efficient" ,WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT ,0 ); - system_freezable_power_efficient_wq =alloc_workqueue ("events_freezable_pwr_efficient" , + system_freezable_power_efficient_wq =alloc_workqueue ("events_freezable_power_efficient" ,WQ_FREEZABLE |WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT ,0 ); BUG_ON(!system_wq || !system_highpri_wq || !system_long_wq ||
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 2/11 Revert "workqueue: Dont call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 9fc557d489f8163c1aabcb89114b8eba960f4097 which is commit 15930da42f8981dc42c19038042947b475b19f47 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +1 -1
@@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ static void wq_update_node_max_active(stlockdep_assert_held (&wq->mutex); -if (off_cpu >=0 && !cpumask_test_cpu (off_cpu, effective)) +if (!cpumask_test_cpu (off_cpu, effective)) off_cpu =-1 ; total_cpus =cpumask_weight_and (effective, cpu_online_mask);
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 3/11 Revert "workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 843288afd3cc6f3342659c6cf81fc47684d25563 which is commit 5797b1c18919cd9c289ded7954383e499f729ce0 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- include/linux/workqueue.h | 35 ---- kernel/workqueue.c | 341 ++++------------------------------------------ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 341 deletions(-)
include/linux/workqueue.h +3 -32
@@ -391,13 +391,6 @@ enum {WQ_MAX_ACTIVE =512 ,/* I like 512, better ideas? */ WQ_UNBOUND_MAX_ACTIVE =WQ_MAX_ACTIVE , WQ_DFL_ACTIVE = WQ_MAX_ACTIVE / 2, - -/* -* Per-node default cap on min_active. Unless explicitly set, min_active -* is set to min(max_active, WQ_DFL_MIN_ACTIVE). For more details, see -* workqueue_struct->min_active definition. -*/ - WQ_DFL_MIN_ACTIVE = 8, };/*
@@ -440,33 +433,11 @@ extern struct workqueue_struct *system_f* alloc_workqueue - allocate a workqueue * @fmt: printf format for the name of the workqueue * @flags: WQ_* flags -* @max_active: max in-flight work items, 0 for default +* @max_active: max in-flight work items per CPU, 0 for default * remaining args: args for @fmt * -* For a per-cpu workqueue, @max_active limits the number of in-flight work -* items for each CPU. e.g. @max_active of 1 indicates that each CPU can be -* executing at most one work item for the workqueue. -* -* For unbound workqueues, @max_active limits the number of in-flight work items -* for the whole system. e.g. @max_active of 16 indicates that that there can be -* at most 16 work items executing for the workqueue in the whole system. -* -* As sharing the same active counter for an unbound workqueue across multiple -* NUMA nodes can be expensive, @max_active is distributed to each NUMA node -* according to the proportion of the number of online CPUs and enforced -* independently. -* -* Depending on online CPU distribution, a node may end up with per-node -* max_active which is significantly lower than @max_active, which can lead to -* deadlocks if the per-node concurrency limit is lower than the maximum number -* of interdependent work items for the workqueue. -* -* To guarantee forward progress regardless of online CPU distribution, the -* concurrency limit on every node is guaranteed to be equal to or greater than -* min_active which is set to min(@max_active, %WQ_DFL_MIN_ACTIVE). This means -* that the sum of per-node max_active's may be larger than @max_active. -* -* For detailed information on %WQ_* flags, please refer to +* Allocate a workqueue with the specified parameters. For detailed +* information on WQ_* flags, please refer to * Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst. * * RETURNS:
kernel/workqueue.c +32 -309
540 lines not on this page · raw message
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 4/11 Revert "workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 7a5cd14a4900e0017142ad479ba8e34671822fc6 which is commit 91ccc6e7233bb10a9c176aa4cc70d6f432a441a5 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 142 ++--------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +7 -135
@@ -281,16 +281,6 @@ struct wq_flusher {struct wq_device ;/* -* Unlike in a per-cpu workqueue where max_active limits its concurrency level -* on each CPU, in an unbound workqueue, max_active applies to the whole system. -* As sharing a single nr_active across multiple sockets can be very expensive, -* the counting and enforcement is per NUMA node. -*/ -struct wq_node_nr_active { -atomic_t nr;/* per-node nr_active count */ -}; - -/* * The externally visible workqueue. It relays the issued work items to * the appropriate worker_pool through its pool_workqueues. */
@@ -336,7 +326,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct {/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */ unsigned int flags____cacheline_aligned ;/* WQ: WQ_* flags */ struct pool_workqueue __percpu __rcu **cpu_pwq;/* I: per-cpu pwqs */ -struct wq_node_nr_active *node_nr_active[];/* I: per-node nr_active */ };static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
@@ -1433,31 +1422,6 @@ work_func_t wq_worker_last_func(struct t }/** -* wq_node_nr_active - Determine wq_node_nr_active to use -* @wq: workqueue of interest -* @node: NUMA node, can be %NUMA_NO_NODE -* -* Determine wq_node_nr_active to use for @wq on @node. Returns: -* -* - %NULL for per-cpu workqueues as they don't need to use shared nr_active. -* -* - node_nr_active[nr_node_ids] if @node is %NUMA_NO_NODE. -* -* - Otherwise, node_nr_active[@node]. -*/ -static struct wq_node_nr_active *wq_node_nr_active (struct workqueue_struct *wq, -int node) -{ -if (!(wq->flags &WQ_UNBOUND )) -return NULL ; - -if (node ==NUMA_NO_NODE ) - node = nr_node_ids; - -return wq->node_nr_active[node]; -} - -/** * get_pwq - get an extra reference on the specified pool_workqueue * @pwq: pool_workqueue to get *
@@ -1538,17 +1502,12 @@ static bool pwq_activate_work(struct poo struct work_struct *work) {struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool; -struct wq_node_nr_active *nna;lockdep_assert_held (&pool->lock);if (!(*work_data_bits (work) &WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE ))return false; - nna =wq_node_nr_active (pwq->wq, pool->node); -if (nna) -atomic_inc (&nna->nr); - pwq->nr_active++;__pwq_activate_work (pwq, work);return true;
@@ -1565,18 +1524,14 @@ static bool pwq_tryinc_nr_active(struct {struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool; -struct wq_node_nr_active *nna =wq_node_nr_active (wq, pool->node);bool obtained;lockdep_assert_held (&pool->lock); obtained = pwq->nr_active <READ_ONCE (wq->max_active); -if (obtained) { +if (obtained) pwq->nr_active++; -if (nna) -atomic_inc (&nna->nr); - }return obtained; }
@@ -1613,26 +1568,10 @@ static bool pwq_activate_first_inactive(static void pwq_dec_nr_active (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) {struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool; -struct wq_node_nr_active *nna =wq_node_nr_active (pwq->wq, pool->node);lockdep_assert_held (&pool->lock); -/* -* @pwq->nr_active should be decremented for both percpu and unbound -* workqueues. -*/ pwq->nr_active--; - -/* -* For a percpu workqueue, it's simple. Just need to kick the first -* inactive work item on @pwq itself. -*/ -if (!nna) { -pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); -return ; - } - -atomic_dec (&nna->nr);pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); }
@@ -4087,63 +4026,11 @@ static void wq_free_lockdep(struct workq }#endif -static void free_node_nr_active (struct wq_node_nr_active **nna_ar) -{ -int node; - -for_each_node (node) { -kfree (nna_ar[node]); - nna_ar[node] =NULL ; - } - -kfree (nna_ar[nr_node_ids]); - nna_ar[nr_node_ids] =NULL ; -} - -static void init_node_nr_active (struct wq_node_nr_active *nna) -{ -atomic_set (&nna->nr,0 ); -} - -/* -* Each node's nr_active counter will be accessed mostly from its own node and -* should be allocated in the node. -*/ -static int alloc_node_nr_active (struct wq_node_nr_active **nna_ar) -{ -struct wq_node_nr_active *nna; -int node; - -for_each_node (node) { - nna =kzalloc_node (sizeof (*nna),GFP_KERNEL , node); -if (!nna) - goto err_free; -init_node_nr_active (nna); - nna_ar[node] = nna; - } - -/* [nr_node_ids] is used as the fallback */ - nna =kzalloc_node (sizeof (*nna),GFP_KERNEL ,NUMA_NO_NODE ); -if (!nna) - goto err_free; -init_node_nr_active (nna); - nna_ar[nr_node_ids] = nna; - -return 0 ; - -err_free: -free_node_nr_active (nna_ar); -return -ENOMEM ; -} -static void rcu_free_wq (struct rcu_head *rcu) {struct workqueue_struct *wq = container_of(rcu, struct workqueue_struct, rcu); -if (wq->flags &WQ_UNBOUND ) -free_node_nr_active (wq->node_nr_active); -wq_free_lockdep (wq);free_percpu (wq->cpu_pwq);free_workqueue_attrs (wq->unbound_attrs);
@@ -4882,8 +4769,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue {va_list args;struct workqueue_struct *wq; -size_t wq_size; -int name_len; +int len;/* * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no longer
@@ -4899,12 +4785,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue flags |=WQ_UNBOUND ;/* allocate wq and format name */ -if (flags &WQ_UNBOUND ) - wq_size =struct_size (wq, node_nr_active, nr_node_ids +1 ); -else - wq_size =sizeof (*wq); - - wq =kzalloc (wq_size,GFP_KERNEL ); + wq =kzalloc (sizeof (*wq),GFP_KERNEL );if (!wq)return NULL ;
@@ -4915,12 +4796,11 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue }va_start (args, max_active); - name_len =vsnprintf (wq->name,sizeof (wq->name), fmt, args); + len =vsnprintf (wq->name,sizeof (wq->name), fmt, args);va_end (args); -if (name_len >=WQ_NAME_LEN ) -pr_warn_once ("workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN. Truncating to: %s\n" , - wq->name); +if (len >=WQ_NAME_LEN ) +pr_warn_once ("workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN. Truncating to: %s\n" , wq->name); max_active = max_active ?:WQ_DFL_ACTIVE ; max_active =wq_clamp_max_active (max_active, flags, wq->name);
@@ -4939,13 +4819,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueuewq_init_lockdep (wq);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&wq->list); -if (flags &WQ_UNBOUND ) { -if (alloc_node_nr_active (wq->node_nr_active) <0 ) - goto err_unreg_lockdep; - } -if (alloc_and_link_pwqs (wq) <0 ) - goto err_free_node_nr_active; + goto err_unreg_lockdep;if (wq_online &&init_rescuer (wq) <0 ) goto err_destroy;
@@ -4970,9 +4845,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueuereturn wq; -err_free_node_nr_active: -if (wq->flags &WQ_UNBOUND ) -free_node_nr_active (wq->node_nr_active); err_unreg_lockdep:wq_unregister_lockdep (wq);wq_free_lockdep (wq);
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 5/11 Revert "workqueue: RCU protect wq->dfl_pwq and implement accessors for it"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 3fb5dbc8bb3759ad0a82d6bf5ed32866c0410a79 which is commit 9f66cff212bb3c1cd25996aaa0dfd0c9e9d8baab upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +24 -40
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {int saved_max_active;/* WQ: saved max_active */ struct workqueue_attrs *unbound_attrs;/* PW: only for unbound wqs */ -struct pool_workqueue __rcu *dfl_pwq;/* PW: only for unbound wqs */ +struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq;/* PW: only for unbound wqs */ #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS struct wq_device *wq_dev;/* I: for sysfs interface */
@@ -635,23 +635,6 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(structreturn ret; } -static struct pool_workqueue __rcu ** -unbound_pwq_slot (struct workqueue_struct *wq,int cpu) -{ -if (cpu >=0 ) -return per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_pwq, cpu); -else -return &wq->dfl_pwq; -} - -/* @cpu < 0 for dfl_pwq */ -static struct pool_workqueue *unbound_pwq (struct workqueue_struct *wq,int cpu) -{ -return rcu_dereference_check (*unbound_pwq_slot (wq, cpu), -lockdep_is_held (&wq_pool_mutex) || -lockdep_is_held (&wq->mutex)); -} -static unsigned int work_color_to_flags (int color) {return color <<WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT ;
@@ -4341,11 +4324,10 @@ static void wq_calc_pod_cpumask(struct w "possible intersect\n"); } -/* install @pwq into @wq and return the old pwq, @cpu < 0 for dfl_pwq */ +/* install @pwq into @wq's cpu_pwq and return the old pwq */ static struct pool_workqueue *install_unbound_pwq (struct workqueue_struct *wq,int cpu,struct pool_workqueue *pwq) { -struct pool_workqueue __rcu **slot =unbound_pwq_slot (wq, cpu);struct pool_workqueue *old_pwq;lockdep_assert_held (&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -4354,8 +4336,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *install_un/* link_pwq() can handle duplicate calls */ link_pwq (pwq); - old_pwq =rcu_access_pointer (*slot); -rcu_assign_pointer (*slot, pwq); + old_pwq =rcu_access_pointer (*per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_pwq, cpu)); +rcu_assign_pointer (*per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_pwq, cpu), pwq);return old_pwq; }
@@ -4455,11 +4437,14 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(structcopy_workqueue_attrs (ctx->wq->unbound_attrs, ctx->attrs); -/* save the previous pwqs and install the new ones */ +/* save the previous pwq and install the new one */ for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) ctx->pwq_tbl[cpu] =install_unbound_pwq (ctx->wq, cpu, ctx->pwq_tbl[cpu]); - ctx->dfl_pwq =install_unbound_pwq (ctx->wq,-1 , ctx->dfl_pwq); + +/* @dfl_pwq might not have been used, ensure it's linked */ +link_pwq (ctx->dfl_pwq); +swap (ctx->wq->dfl_pwq, ctx->dfl_pwq);mutex_unlock (&ctx->wq->mutex); }
@@ -4569,7 +4554,9 @@ static void wq_update_pod(struct workque/* nothing to do if the target cpumask matches the current pwq */ wq_calc_pod_cpumask (target_attrs, cpu, off_cpu); -if (wqattrs_equal (target_attrs,unbound_pwq (wq, cpu)->pool->attrs)) + pwq =rcu_dereference_protected (*per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_pwq, cpu), +lockdep_is_held (&wq_pool_mutex)); +if (wqattrs_equal (target_attrs, pwq->pool->attrs))return ;/* create a new pwq */
@@ -4587,11 +4574,10 @@ static void wq_update_pod(struct workque use_dfl_pwq:mutex_lock (&wq->mutex); - pwq =unbound_pwq (wq,-1 ); -raw_spin_lock_irq (&pwq->pool->lock); -get_pwq (pwq); -raw_spin_unlock_irq (&pwq->pool->lock); - old_pwq =install_unbound_pwq (wq, cpu, pwq); +raw_spin_lock_irq (&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock); +get_pwq (wq->dfl_pwq); +raw_spin_unlock_irq (&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock); + old_pwq =install_unbound_pwq (wq, cpu, wq->dfl_pwq); out_unlock:mutex_unlock (&wq->mutex);put_pwq_unlocked (old_pwq);
@@ -4629,13 +4615,10 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct wocpus_read_lock ();if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) { -struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq; - ret =apply_workqueue_attrs (wq, ordered_wq_attrs[highpri]);/* there should only be single pwq for ordering guarantee */ - dfl_pwq =rcu_access_pointer (wq->dfl_pwq); -WARN (!ret && (wq->pwqs.next != &dfl_pwq->pwqs_node || - wq->pwqs.prev != &dfl_pwq->pwqs_node), +WARN (!ret && (wq->pwqs.next != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node || + wq->pwqs.prev != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node),"ordering guarantee broken for workqueue %s\n" , wq->name); }else { ret =apply_workqueue_attrs (wq, unbound_std_wq_attrs[highpri]);
@@ -4866,7 +4849,7 @@ static bool pwq_busy(struct pool_workqueif (pwq->nr_in_flight[i])return true; -if ((pwq !=rcu_access_pointer (pwq->wq->dfl_pwq)) && (pwq->refcnt >1 )) +if ((pwq != pwq->wq->dfl_pwq) && (pwq->refcnt >1 ))return true;if (!pwq_is_empty (pwq))return true;
@@ -4950,12 +4933,13 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_rcu_read_lock ();for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { -put_pwq_unlocked (unbound_pwq (wq, cpu)); -RCU_INIT_POINTER (*unbound_pwq_slot (wq, cpu),NULL ); + pwq =rcu_access_pointer (*per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_pwq, cpu)); +RCU_INIT_POINTER (*per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_pwq, cpu),NULL ); +put_pwq_unlocked (pwq); } -put_pwq_unlocked (unbound_pwq (wq,-1 )); -RCU_INIT_POINTER (*unbound_pwq_slot (wq,-1 ),NULL ); +put_pwq_unlocked (wq->dfl_pwq); + wq->dfl_pwq =NULL ;rcu_read_unlock (); }
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 6/11 Revert "workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit ddb232dc0f1339f9ed506730fd6bee6f5e3dcb37 which is commit c5404d4e6df6faba1007544b5f4e62c7c14416dd upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 33 +++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +13 -20
@@ -4703,7 +4703,7 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue*/ static void wq_adjust_max_active (struct workqueue_struct *wq) { -bool activated; +struct pool_workqueue *pwq;lockdep_assert_held (&wq->mutex);
@@ -4723,26 +4723,19 @@ static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct*/ WRITE_ONCE (wq->max_active, wq->saved_max_active); -/* -* Round-robin through pwq's activating the first inactive work item -* until max_active is filled. -*/ -do { -struct pool_workqueue *pwq; +for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) { +unsigned long flags; + +/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */ +raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); - activated = false; -for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) { -unsigned long flags; - -/* can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */ -raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); -if (pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq)) { - activated = true; -kick_pool (pwq->pool); - } -raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); - } - }while (activated); +while (pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq)) + ; + +kick_pool (pwq->pool); + +raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); + } }__printf (1 ,4 )
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 7/11 Revert "workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 6584970ff38fc8f875c683dbb47bb38d4132a528 which is commit 1c270b79ce0b8290f146255ea9057243f6dd3c17 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 86 +++++++++++------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +19 -67
@@ -1464,14 +1464,11 @@ static bool pwq_is_empty(struct pool_worstatic void __pwq_activate_work (struct pool_workqueue *pwq,struct work_struct *work) { -unsigned long *wdb =work_data_bits (work); - -WARN_ON_ONCE (!(*wdb &WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE ));trace_workqueue_activate_work (work);if (list_empty (&pwq->pool->worklist)) pwq->pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;move_linked_works (work, &pwq->pool->worklist,NULL ); -__clear_bit (WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE_BIT , wdb); +__clear_bit (WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE_BIT ,work_data_bits (work)); }/**
@@ -1496,66 +1493,12 @@ static bool pwq_activate_work(struct pooreturn true; } -/** -* pwq_tryinc_nr_active - Try to increment nr_active for a pwq -* @pwq: pool_workqueue of interest -* -* Try to increment nr_active for @pwq. Returns %true if an nr_active count is -* successfully obtained. %false otherwise. -*/ -static bool pwq_tryinc_nr_active (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) -{ -struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq; -struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool; -bool obtained; - -lockdep_assert_held (&pool->lock); - - obtained = pwq->nr_active <READ_ONCE (wq->max_active); - -if (obtained) - pwq->nr_active++; -return obtained; -} - -/** -* pwq_activate_first_inactive - Activate the first inactive work item on a pwq -* @pwq: pool_workqueue of interest -* -* Activate the first inactive work item of @pwq if available and allowed by -* max_active limit. -* -* Returns %true if an inactive work item has been activated. %false if no -* inactive work item is found or max_active limit is reached. -*/ -static bool pwq_activate_first_inactive (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) -{ -struct work_struct *work = -list_first_entry_or_null (&pwq->inactive_works, - struct work_struct, entry); - -if (work &&pwq_tryinc_nr_active (pwq)) { -__pwq_activate_work (pwq, work); -return true; - }else { -return false; - } -} - -/** -* pwq_dec_nr_active - Retire an active count -* @pwq: pool_workqueue of interest -* -* Decrement @pwq's nr_active and try to activate the first inactive work item. -*/ -static void pwq_dec_nr_active (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) +static void pwq_activate_first_inactive (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) { -struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool; +struct work_struct *work =list_first_entry (&pwq->inactive_works, + struct work_struct, entry); -lockdep_assert_held (&pool->lock); - - pwq->nr_active--; -pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); +pwq_activate_work (pwq, work); }/**
@@ -1573,8 +1516,14 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(struct {int color =get_work_color (work_data); -if (!(work_data &WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE )) -pwq_dec_nr_active (pwq); +if (!(work_data &WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE )) { + pwq->nr_active--; +if (!list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works)) { +/* one down, submit an inactive one */ +if (pwq->nr_active <READ_ONCE (pwq->wq->max_active)) +pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); + } + } pwq->nr_in_flight[color]--;
@@ -1876,11 +1825,13 @@ retry:* @work must also queue behind existing inactive work items to maintain * ordering when max_active changes. See wq_adjust_max_active(). */ -if (list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works) &&pwq_tryinc_nr_active (pwq)) { +if (list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works) && + pwq->nr_active <READ_ONCE (pwq->wq->max_active)) {if (list_empty (&pool->worklist)) pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;trace_workqueue_activate_work (work); + pwq->nr_active++;insert_work (pwq, work, &pool->worklist, work_flags);kick_pool (pool); }else {
@@ -4729,8 +4680,9 @@ static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); -while (pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq)) - ; +while (!list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works) && + pwq->nr_active < wq->max_active) +pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq);kick_pool (pwq->pool);
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 8/11 Revert "workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work()"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit f4505c2033ad25839f6fd9be6fc474b8306c44eb which is commit 4c6380305d21e36581b451f7337a36c93b64e050 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 31 ++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +6 -25
@@ -1461,36 +1461,16 @@ static bool pwq_is_empty(struct pool_worreturn !pwq->nr_active &&list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works); } -static void __pwq_activate_work (struct pool_workqueue *pwq, -struct work_struct *work) +static void pwq_activate_inactive_work (struct work_struct *work) { +struct pool_workqueue *pwq =get_work_pwq (work); +trace_workqueue_activate_work (work);if (list_empty (&pwq->pool->worklist)) pwq->pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;move_linked_works (work, &pwq->pool->worklist,NULL );__clear_bit (WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE_BIT ,work_data_bits (work)); -} - -/** -* pwq_activate_work - Activate a work item if inactive -* @pwq: pool_workqueue @work belongs to -* @work: work item to activate -* -* Returns %true if activated. %false if already active. -*/ -static bool pwq_activate_work (struct pool_workqueue *pwq, -struct work_struct *work) -{ -struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool; - -lockdep_assert_held (&pool->lock); - -if (!(*work_data_bits (work) &WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE )) -return false; - pwq->nr_active++; -__pwq_activate_work (pwq, work); -return true; }static void pwq_activate_first_inactive (struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
@@ -1498,7 +1478,7 @@ static void pwq_activate_first_inactive(struct work_struct *work =list_first_entry (&pwq->inactive_works, struct work_struct, entry); -pwq_activate_work (pwq, work); +pwq_activate_inactive_work (work); }/**
@@ -1636,7 +1616,8 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct wo* management later on and cause stall. Make sure the work * item is activated before grabbing. */ -pwq_activate_work (pwq, work); +if (*work_data_bits (work) &WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE ) +pwq_activate_inactive_work (work);list_del_init (&work->entry);pwq_dec_nr_in_flight (pwq, *work_data_bits (work));
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 9/11 Revert "workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty()"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 70abdc2f6c906ffea699f6e0e08fcbd9437e6bcc which is commit afa87ce85379e2d93863fce595afdb5771a84004 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +4 -9
@@ -1456,11 +1456,6 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool } } -static bool pwq_is_empty (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) -{ -return !pwq->nr_active &&list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works); -} -static void pwq_activate_inactive_work (struct work_struct *work) {struct pool_workqueue *pwq =get_work_pwq (work);
@@ -3330,7 +3325,7 @@ reflush:bool drained;raw_spin_lock_irq (&pwq->pool->lock); - drained =pwq_is_empty (pwq); + drained = !pwq->nr_active &&list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works);raw_spin_unlock_irq (&pwq->pool->lock);if (drained)
@@ -4777,7 +4772,7 @@ static bool pwq_busy(struct pool_workqueif ((pwq != pwq->wq->dfl_pwq) && (pwq->refcnt >1 ))return true; -if (!pwq_is_empty (pwq)) +if (pwq->nr_active || !list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works))return true;return false;
@@ -5215,7 +5210,7 @@ void show_one_workqueue(struct workqueueunsigned long flags;for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) { -if (!pwq_is_empty (pwq)) { +if (pwq->nr_active || !list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works)) { idle = false;break ; }
@@ -5227,7 +5222,7 @@ void show_one_workqueue(struct workqueuefor_each_pwq (pwq, wq) {raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); -if (!pwq_is_empty (pwq)) { +if (pwq->nr_active || !list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works)) {/* * Defer printing to avoid deadlocks in console * drivers that queue work while holding locks
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 10/11 Revert "workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 0c4ce23e6323e52d0590e78825cd3c63323d7a52 which is commit a045a272d887575da17ad86d6573e82871b50c27 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +67 -66
@@ -143,9 +143,6 @@ enum {* * WR: wq->mutex protected for writes. RCU protected for reads. * -* WO: wq->mutex protected for writes. Updated with WRITE_ONCE() and can be read -* with READ_ONCE() without locking. -* * MD: wq_mayday_lock protected. * * WD: Used internally by the watchdog.
@@ -253,6 +250,7 @@ struct pool_workqueue {* is marked with WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE iff it is in pwq->inactive_works. */ int nr_active;/* L: nr of active works */ +int max_active;/* L: max active works */ struct list_head inactive_works;/* L: inactive works */ struct list_head pwqs_node;/* WR: node on wq->pwqs */ struct list_head mayday_node;/* MD: node on wq->maydays */
@@ -300,8 +298,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {struct worker *rescuer;/* MD: rescue worker */ int nr_drainers;/* WQ: drain in progress */ -int max_active;/* WO: max active works */ -int saved_max_active;/* WQ: saved max_active */ +int saved_max_active;/* WQ: saved pwq max_active */ struct workqueue_attrs *unbound_attrs;/* PW: only for unbound wqs */ struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq;/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
@@ -1495,7 +1492,7 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(struct pwq->nr_active--;if (!list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works)) {/* one down, submit an inactive one */ -if (pwq->nr_active <READ_ONCE (pwq->wq->max_active)) +if (pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); } }
@@ -1796,13 +1793,7 @@ retry: pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++; work_flags =work_color_to_flags (pwq->work_color); -/* -* Limit the number of concurrently active work items to max_active. -* @work must also queue behind existing inactive work items to maintain -* ordering when max_active changes. See wq_adjust_max_active(). -*/ -if (list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works) && - pwq->nr_active <READ_ONCE (pwq->wq->max_active)) { +if (likely (pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)) {if (list_empty (&pool->worklist)) pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
@@ -4151,6 +4142,50 @@ static void pwq_release_workfn(struct kt } } +/** +* pwq_adjust_max_active - update a pwq's max_active to the current setting +* @pwq: target pool_workqueue +* +* If @pwq isn't freezing, set @pwq->max_active to the associated +* workqueue's saved_max_active and activate inactive work items +* accordingly. If @pwq is freezing, clear @pwq->max_active to zero. +*/ +static void pwq_adjust_max_active (struct pool_workqueue *pwq) +{ +struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq; +bool freezable = wq->flags &WQ_FREEZABLE ; +unsigned long flags; + +/* for @wq->saved_max_active */ +lockdep_assert_held (&wq->mutex); + +/* fast exit for non-freezable wqs */ +if (!freezable && pwq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active) +return ; + +/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */ +raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); + +/* +* During [un]freezing, the caller is responsible for ensuring that +* this function is called at least once after @workqueue_freezing +* is updated and visible. +*/ +if (!freezable || !workqueue_freezing) { + pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active; + +while (!list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works) && + pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active) +pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); + +kick_pool (pwq->pool); + }else { + pwq->max_active =0 ; + } + +raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); +} +/* initialize newly allocated @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */ static void init_pwq (struct pool_workqueue *pwq,struct workqueue_struct *wq,struct worker_pool *pool)
@@ -4183,6 +4218,9 @@ static void link_pwq(struct pool_workque/* set the matching work_color */ pwq->work_color = wq->work_color; +/* sync max_active to the current setting */ +pwq_adjust_max_active (pwq); +/* link in @pwq */ list_add_rcu (&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs); }
@@ -4620,52 +4658,6 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueuereturn 0 ; } -/** -* wq_adjust_max_active - update a wq's max_active to the current setting -* @wq: target workqueue -* -* If @wq isn't freezing, set @wq->max_active to the saved_max_active and -* activate inactive work items accordingly. If @wq is freezing, clear -* @wq->max_active to zero. -*/ -static void wq_adjust_max_active (struct workqueue_struct *wq) -{ -struct pool_workqueue *pwq; - -lockdep_assert_held (&wq->mutex); - -if ((wq->flags &WQ_FREEZABLE ) && workqueue_freezing) { -WRITE_ONCE (wq->max_active,0 ); -return ; - } - -if (wq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active) -return ; - -/* -* Update @wq->max_active and then kick inactive work items if more -* active work items are allowed. This doesn't break work item ordering -* because new work items are always queued behind existing inactive -* work items if there are any. -*/ -WRITE_ONCE (wq->max_active, wq->saved_max_active); - -for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) { -unsigned long flags; - -/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */ -raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); - -while (!list_empty (&pwq->inactive_works) && - pwq->nr_active < wq->max_active) -pwq_activate_first_inactive (pwq); - -kick_pool (pwq->pool); - -raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pwq->pool->lock, flags); - } -} - __printf(1, 4) struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt, unsigned int flags,
@@ -4673,6 +4665,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue {va_list args;struct workqueue_struct *wq; +struct pool_workqueue *pwq;int len;/*
@@ -4711,7 +4704,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue/* init wq */ wq->flags = flags; - wq->max_active = max_active; wq->saved_max_active = max_active;mutex_init (&wq->mutex);atomic_set (&wq->nr_pwqs_to_flush,0 );
@@ -4740,7 +4732,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueuemutex_lock (&wq_pool_mutex);mutex_lock (&wq->mutex); -wq_adjust_max_active (wq); +for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) +pwq_adjust_max_active (pwq);mutex_unlock (&wq->mutex);list_add_tail_rcu (&wq->list, &workqueues);
@@ -4878,6 +4871,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(destroy_workqueue);*/ void workqueue_set_max_active (struct workqueue_struct *wq,int max_active) { +struct pool_workqueue *pwq; +/* disallow meddling with max_active for ordered workqueues */ if (WARN_ON (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT))return ;
@@ -4888,7 +4883,9 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct wor wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED; wq->saved_max_active = max_active; -wq_adjust_max_active (wq); + +for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) +pwq_adjust_max_active (pwq);mutex_unlock (&wq->mutex); }
@@ -5135,8 +5132,8 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workquepr_info (" pwq %d:" , pool->id);pr_cont_pool_info (pool); -pr_cont (" active=%d refcnt=%d%s\n" , - pwq->nr_active, pwq->refcnt, +pr_cont (" active=%d/%d refcnt=%d%s\n" , + pwq->nr_active, pwq->max_active, pwq->refcnt, !list_empty (&pwq->mayday_node) ?" MAYDAY" :"" );hash_for_each (pool->busy_hash, bkt, worker, hentry) {
@@ -5684,6 +5681,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu_safe_key);void freeze_workqueues_begin (void ) {struct workqueue_struct *wq; +struct pool_workqueue *pwq;mutex_lock (&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -5692,7 +5690,8 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)list_for_each_entry (wq, &workqueues, list) {mutex_lock (&wq->mutex); -wq_adjust_max_active (wq); +for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) +pwq_adjust_max_active (pwq);mutex_unlock (&wq->mutex); }
@@ -5757,6 +5756,7 @@ out_unlock:void thaw_workqueues (void ) {struct workqueue_struct *wq; +struct pool_workqueue *pwq;mutex_lock (&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -5768,7 +5768,8 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)/* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */ list_for_each_entry (wq, &workqueues, list) {mutex_lock (&wq->mutex); -wq_adjust_max_active (wq); +for_each_pwq (pwq, wq) +pwq_adjust_max_active (pwq);mutex_unlock (&wq->mutex); }
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 11/11 Revert "workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 43f0cec175f92c7a01e43d5d6f276262670a97ed which is commit 31c89007285d365aa36f71d8fb0701581c770a27 upstream.
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported regressions, so revert them for now.
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +2 -6
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ enum {RESCUER_NICE_LEVEL =MIN_NICE ,HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL =MIN_NICE , - WQ_NAME_LEN = 32, + WQ_NAME_LEN = 24, };/*
@@ -4666,7 +4666,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueueva_list args;struct workqueue_struct *wq;struct pool_workqueue *pwq; -int len;/* * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no longer
@@ -4693,12 +4692,9 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue }va_start (args, max_active); - len =vsnprintf (wq->name,sizeof (wq->name), fmt, args); +vsnprintf (wq->name,sizeof (wq->name), fmt, args);va_end (args); -if (len >=WQ_NAME_LEN ) -pr_warn_once ("workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN. Truncating to: %s\n" , wq->name); - max_active = max_active ?:WQ_DFL_ACTIVE ; max_active =wq_clamp_max_active (max_active, flags, wq->name);
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.
Signature · 1 line
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Hi!
Quoted 4 lines
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Linux 6.8.4-rc1 (c4c57420c666) tested out ok:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.8.y
No problems with Linux 6.6.25-rc1 (e253a5c1b7de), either.
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Luna Jernberg
Tested-byDen tors 4 apr. 2024 kl 10:03 skrev Ron Economos <[email protected]>:
Quoted 16 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 14 lines
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by Ron Economos <[email protected]>
Works fine on my Arch Linux desktop with model name : AMD Ryzen 5
5600 6-Core Processor
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
No new regressions for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.8:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 115 pass, 1 failLinux version: 6.8.4-rc1-gc4c57420c666
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
I have asked Thierry about the fix for the kernel warning we have been observing on v6.8 that is causing the above test to fail. We are going to get this into -next for a bit more testing. Once this lands in the mainline, I will let you know.
Jon
Signature · 1 line
nvpublic
Quoted 4 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build
* kernel: 6.8.4-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.8.y
* git commit: c4c57420c666b4ef4b77e6600f062bd5e631403d
* git describe: v6.8.3-12-gc4c57420c666
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.8.y/build/v6.8.3-12-gc4c57420c666
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.8.2)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.8.2)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.8.2)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.8.2)
## Test result summary
total: 148875, pass: 130376, fail: 1350, skip: 17015, xfail: 134
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.4 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:51:13 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.4-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.8.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Signature · 1 line
Florian