wifi: wil6210: Annotate struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd with __counted_by()
PATCH 1/1 wifi: wil6210: Annotate struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd with __counted_by()
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
--- drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.h +1 -1
@@ -3320,7 +3320,7 @@ struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd {u8 rssi_hyst;u8 reserved[12 ];u8 rssi_thresholds_list_size; -s8 rssi_thresholds_list[]; + s8 rssi_thresholds_list[] __counted_by(rssi_thresholds_list_size); } __packed;/* wmi_link_monitor_event_type */
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Quoted 7 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
__counted_byattribute. Flexible array members annotated with__counted_bycan have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
I'm dropping this because it looks like you sent a different patch, but it's quite hard to know for sure.
Patch set to Superseded.
Signature · 3 lines
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/ZgODZOB4fOBvKl7R@neat/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Quoted 8 lines · Kalle Valo
Quoted 6 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
__counted_byattribute. Flexible array members annotated with__counted_bycan have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>I'm dropping this because it looks like you sent a different patch, but it's quite hard to know for sure.
Ah yes, sorry, this was replaced by the following patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/ZgSTCmdP+omePvWg@neat/
Thanks!
--
Gustavo