ATA PASS-THROUGH sense data fixes
Subsystems (2)
v3 cover ATA PASS-THROUGH sense data fixes
This patch series is fixing a few ATA PASS-THROUGH issues:
1. Not reporting "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" when ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID is set.
2. Generating "fake" sk/asc/ascq based on ATA status/error registers when ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID is set and CK_COND=1.
3. Fixed format sense data was using incorrect field offsets for ATA PASS-THROUGH commands.
4. Using qc->result_tf in ATA sense data generation functions without checking if qc->result_tf contains a valid data.
Changes since v1:
Thanks Damien and Niklas for the reviews!
- Squashed two v1 patches 2/4 and 3/4 into one patch with a different implementation.
- Added 'Cc: [email protected]' tags to patches that are fixing bugs.
- Reordered patches with the 'Cc: [email protected]' tag to be applied first in order to simplify backports to stable releases.
- Restored the buffer memset in atapi_eh_request_sense().
- Updated declaration order in v1 patch 4/4.
- Added a patch to cleanup unused ATA device id in ata_to_sense_error().
- Updated fill_result_tf() to set ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED after populating the result taskfile. Removed now redundant flag sets/checks from ahci.
- Updated ATA sense data generation functions to return early if result_tf is not filled. Added WARN_ON_ONCE checks to generate a warning when ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED is not set and libata needs to generate sense data.
Changes since v2:
- Moved v2 2/6 patch (fixed ATA PT offsets) to be the first one in v3.
- Removed unused variable 'sb' from ata_gen_passthru_sense().
- Removed WARN_ON_ONCE checks and added ata_dev_dbg() logs instead.
- Removed the Fixes tag from v2 4/6 patch because the patch is doing a cleanup and is not fixing any bugs.
Igor Pylypiv (6):
ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
ata: libata-scsi: Remove redundant sense_buffer memsets
ata: libata-scsi: Do not pass ATA device id to ata_to_sense_error()
ata: libata: Set ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED in fill_result_tf()
ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
drivers/ata/libahci.c | 10 -- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 8 ++ drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
PATCH v3 1/6 ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
Correct the ATA PASS-THROUGH fixed format sense data offsets to conform to SPC-6 and SAT-5 specifications. Additionally, set the VALID bit to indicate that the INFORMATION field contains valid information.
INFORMATION
===========
SAT-5 Table 212 — "Fixed format sense data INFORMATION field for the ATA PASS-THROUGH commands" defines the following format:
+------+------------+ | Byte | Field | +------+------------+ | 0 | ERROR | | 1 | STATUS | | 2 | DEVICE | | 3 | COUNT(7:0) | +------+------------+
SPC-6 Table 48 - "Fixed format sense data" specifies that the INFORMATION field starts at byte 3 in sense buffer resulting in the following offsets for the ATA PASS-THROUGH commands:
+------------+-------------------------+ | Field | Offset in sense buffer | +------------+-------------------------+ | ERROR | 3 | | STATUS | 4 | | DEVICE | 5 | | COUNT(7:0) | 6 | +------------+-------------------------+
COMMAND-SPECIFIC INFORMATION
============================
SAT-5 Table 213 - "Fixed format sense data COMMAND-SPECIFIC INFORMATION field for ATA PASS-THROUGH" defines the following format:
+------+-------------------+ | Byte | Field | +------+-------------------+ | 0 | FLAGS | LOG INDEX | | 1 | LBA (7:0) | | 2 | LBA (15:8) | | 3 | LBA (23:16) | +------+-------------------+
SPC-6 Table 48 - "Fixed format sense data" specifies that the COMMAND-SPECIFIC-INFORMATION field starts at byte 8 in sense buffer resulting in the following offsets for the ATA PASS-THROUGH commands:
Offsets of these fields in the fixed sense format are as follows:
+-------------------+-------------------------+ | Field | Offset in sense buffer | +-------------------+-------------------------+ | FLAGS | LOG INDEX | 8 | | LBA (7:0) | 9 | | LBA (15:8) | 10 | | LBA (23:16) | 11 | +-------------------+-------------------------+
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +13 -13
@@ -855,7 +855,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; -unsigned char *desc = sb +8 ;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq;memset (sb,0 ,SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE );
@@ -877,7 +876,8 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } -if ((cmd->sense_buffer[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +unsigned char *desc;u8 len;/* descriptor format */
@@ -916,21 +916,21 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) } }else {/* Fixed sense format */ - desc[0 ] = tf->error; - desc[1 ] = tf->status; - desc[2 ] = tf->device; - desc[3 ] = tf->nsect; - desc[7 ] =0 ; + sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[3 ] = tf->error; + sb[4 ] = tf->status; + sb[5 ] = tf->device; + sb[6 ] = tf->nsect;if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - desc[8 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[8 ] |=0x80 ;if (tf->hob_nsect) - desc[8 ] |=0x40 ; + sb[8 ] |=0x40 ;if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) - desc[8 ] |=0x20 ; + sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; } - desc[9 ] = tf->lbal; - desc[10 ] = tf->lbam; - desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; + sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; + sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; + sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; } }
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
Hello Igor, Hannes,
The changes in this patch looks good, however, there is still one thing that bothers me:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.10-rc5/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c#L873-L877
Specifically the code in the else statement below:
if (qc->err_mask ||
tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) {
ata_to_sense_error(qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error,
&sense_key, &asc, &ascq);
ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq);
} else {
/*
* ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE
* Always in descriptor format sense.
*/
scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D);
}Looking at sat6r01, I see that this is table:
Table 217 — ATA command results
And this text:
No error, successful completion or command in progress. The SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status with the sense key set to RECOVERED ERROR with the additional sense code set to ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE (see SPC-5). Descriptor format sense data shall include the ATA Status Return sense data descriptor (see 12.2.2.7).
However, I don't see anything in this text that says that the sense key should always be in descriptor format sense.
In fact, what will happen if the user has not set the D_SENSE bit (libata will default not set it), is that:
The else statement above will be executed, filling in sense key in descriptor format, after this if/else, we will continue checking if the sense buffer is in descriptor format, or fixed format.
Since the scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); is called with (..., 1, ..., ..., ...) it will always generate the sense data in descriptor format, regardless of dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE being set or not.
Should perhaps the code in the else statement be:
} else {
ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D);
}So that we actually respect the D_SENSE bit?
(We currently respect if when filling the sense data buffer with sense data from REQUEST SENSE EXT, so I'm not sure why we shouldn't respect it for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands.)
Kind regards,
Niklas
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
Quoted 53 lines · Niklas Cassel
Hello Igor, Hannes,
The changes in this patch looks good, however, there is still one thing that bothers me:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.10-rc5/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c#L873-L877Specifically the code in the else statement below:
if (qc->err_mask || tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) { ata_to_sense_error(qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error, &sense_key, &asc, &ascq); ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); } else { /* * ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE * Always in descriptor format sense. */ scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); }Looking at sat6r01, I see that this is table:
Table 217 — ATA command resultsAnd this text:
No error, successful completion or command in progress. The SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status with the sense key set to RECOVERED ERROR with the additional sense code set to ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE (see SPC-5). Descriptor format sense data shall include the ATA Status Return sense data descriptor (see 12.2.2.7).However, I don't see anything in this text that says that the sense key should always be in descriptor format sense.
In fact, what will happen if the user has not set the
D_SENSEbit (libata will default not set it), is that:The else statement above will be executed, filling in sense key in descriptor format, after this if/else, we will continue checking if the sense buffer is in descriptor format, or fixed format.
Since the
scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); is called with (..., 1, ..., ..., ...) it will always generate the sense data in descriptor format, regardless ofdev->flagsATA_DFLAG_D_SENSEbeing set or not.Should perhaps the code in the else statement be:
} else { ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); }
Quoted 6 lines
So that we actually respect the
D_SENSEbit?(We currently respect if when filling the sense data buffer with sense data from REQUEST SENSE EXT, so I'm not sure why we shouldn't respect it for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands.)
Thanks for pointing this out, Niklas! I agree, it seems like there is no reason to ignore the D_SENSE bit.
Interestingly, the code was using ata_scsi_set_sense() before. Commit 11093cb1ef56 ("libata-scsi: generate correct ATA pass-through sense)" changed it to always be in the descriptor format.
Quoted 3 lines
Kind regards,
Niklas
Thanks,
Igor
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
In reply to Niklas CasselQuoted 53 lines · Niklas Cassel
Hello Igor, Hannes,
The changes in this patch looks good, however, there is still one thing that bothers me:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.10-rc5/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c#L873-L877Specifically the code in the else statement below:
if (qc->err_mask || tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) { ata_to_sense_error(qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error, &sense_key, &asc, &ascq); ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); } else { /* * ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE * Always in descriptor format sense. */ scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); }Looking at sat6r01, I see that this is table:
Table 217 — ATA command resultsAnd this text:
No error, successful completion or command in progress. The SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status with the sense key set to RECOVERED ERROR with the additional sense code set to ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE (see SPC-5). Descriptor format sense data shall include the ATA Status Return sense data descriptor (see 12.2.2.7).However, I don't see anything in this text that says that the sense key should always be in descriptor format sense.
In fact, what will happen if the user has not set the
D_SENSEbit (libata will default not set it), is that:The else statement above will be executed, filling in sense key in descriptor format, after this if/else, we will continue checking if the sense buffer is in descriptor format, or fixed format.
Since the
scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); is called with (..., 1, ..., ..., ...) it will always generate the sense data in descriptor format, regardless ofdev->flagsATA_DFLAG_D_SENSEbeing set or not.Should perhaps the code in the else statement be:
} else { ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); }
Quoted 6 lines
So that we actually respect the
D_SENSEbit?(We currently respect if when filling the sense data buffer with sense data from REQUEST SENSE EXT, so I'm not sure why we shouldn't respect it for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands.)
I guess that we've misread the spec.
The sentence:
"Descriptor format sense data shall include the ATA Status Return
Descriptor"
should be interpreted as:
_If_ the sense code is formatted in descriptor format _then_ the ATA Status Return Descriptor should be included.
IE if the sense code is not in descriptor format then the ATA Status Return Descriptor shouldn't be included (kinda obvious, really). But of course the D_SENSE bit should be honoured.
Cheers,
Hannes
Signature · 4 lines
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
Quoted 54 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Quoted 53 lines · Niklas Cassel
Hello Igor, Hannes,
The changes in this patch looks good, however, there is still one thing that bothers me:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.10-rc5/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c#L873-L877Specifically the code in the else statement below:
if (qc->err_mask || tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) { ata_to_sense_error(qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error, &sense_key, &asc, &ascq); ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); } else { /* * ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE * Always in descriptor format sense. */ scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); }Looking at sat6r01, I see that this is table:
Table 217 — ATA command resultsAnd this text:
No error, successful completion or command in progress. The SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status with the sense key set to RECOVERED ERROR with the additional sense code set to ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE (see SPC-5). Descriptor format sense data shall include the ATA Status Return sense data descriptor (see 12.2.2.7).However, I don't see anything in this text that says that the sense key should always be in descriptor format sense.
In fact, what will happen if the user has not set the
D_SENSEbit (libata will default not set it), is that:The else statement above will be executed, filling in sense key in descriptor format, after this if/else, we will continue checking if the sense buffer is in descriptor format, or fixed format.
Since the
scsi_build_sense(cmd, 1, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); is called with (..., 1, ..., ..., ...) it will always generate the sense data in descriptor format, regardless ofdev->flagsATA_DFLAG_D_SENSEbeing set or not.Should perhaps the code in the else statement be:
} else { ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, RECOVERED_ERROR, 0, 0x1D); }
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
So that we actually respect the
D_SENSEbit?(We currently respect if when filling the sense data buffer with sense data from REQUEST SENSE EXT, so I'm not sure why we shouldn't respect it for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands.)
I guess that we've misread the spec.
I think I might have an idea where you got this from:
In sat5r06.pdf
"""
12.2.2.8 Fixed format sense data
Table 212 shows the fields returned in the fixed format sense data (see SPC-5) for ATA PASS-THROUGH commands. SATLs compliant with ANSI INCITS 431-2007, SCSI/ATA Translation (SAT) return descriptor format sense data for the ATA PASS-THROUGH commands regardless of the setting of the D_SENSE bit. """
In sat6r01.pdf:
"""
12.2.2.8 Fixed format sense data
Table 219 shows the fields returned in the fixed format sense data (see SPC-5) for ATA PASS-THROUGH
commands.
"""
In SAT-6 there is no mention of compliance with ANSI INCITS 431-2007 should ignore D_SENSE bit and unconditionally return sense data in descriptor format.
Anyway, considering that:
1) I'm not sure how a SAT would expose that it is compliant with ANSI INCITS 431-2007.
2) This text has been removed from SAT-6.
3) We currently honour the D_SENSE bit when creating the sense buffer with the SK/ASC/ASCQ that we get from the device.
I think that it makes sense to honour the D_SENSE bit also when generating sense data for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands (from ATA registers).
Kind regards,
Niklas
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
Quoted 13 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 1 line · Hannes Reinecke
On 6/27/24 14:08, Niklas Cassel wrote:
In SAT-6 there is no mention of compliance with ANSI INCITS 431-2007 should ignore
D_SENSEbit and unconditionally return sense data in descriptor format.Anyway, considering that:
1) I'm not sure how a SAT would expose that it is compliant with ANSI INCITS 431-2007.
2) This text has been removed from SAT-6.
3) We currently honour theD_SENSEbit when creating the sense buffer with the SK/ASC/ASCQ that we get from the device.
Quoted 2 lines
I think that it makes sense to honour the
D_SENSEbit also when generating sense data for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands (from ATA registers).
Igor, I think you should add a new patch in your series that does:
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +2 -5
@@ -949,11 +949,8 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) &sense_key, &asc, &ascq);ata_scsi_set_sense (qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); }else { -/* -* ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE -* Always in descriptor format sense. -*/ -scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); +/* ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ +ata_scsi_set_sense (qc->dev, cmd,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } }
Feel free to copy my arguments above.
I also checked VPD page 89h (ATA Information VPD page), and there are no bits there either to claim certain SAT version compliance.
And since this text is not in SAT-6, I can only imagine that they decided that is was not a good idea to not always honor D_SENSE...
(It does seem simpler to just always honor it...)
Kind regards,
Niklas
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: Fix offsets for the fixed format sense data
Quoted 14 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 13 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 1 line · Hannes Reinecke
On 6/27/24 14:08, Niklas Cassel wrote:
In SAT-6 there is no mention of compliance with ANSI INCITS 431-2007 should ignore
D_SENSEbit and unconditionally return sense data in descriptor format.Anyway, considering that:
1) I'm not sure how a SAT would expose that it is compliant with ANSI INCITS 431-2007.
2) This text has been removed from SAT-6.
3) We currently honour theD_SENSEbit when creating the sense buffer with the SK/ASC/ASCQ that we get from the device.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I think that it makes sense to honour the
D_SENSEbit also when generating sense data for successful ATA PASS-THROUGH commands (from ATA registers).Igor, I think you should add a new patch in your series that does:
Thanks Niklas, I'll add the patch in v4.
Quoted 33 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +2
-5@@ -949,11 +949,8 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) &sense_key, &asc, &ascq);ata_scsi_set_sense (qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); }else { -/* -* ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE -* Always in descriptor format sense. -*/ -scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); +/* ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ +ata_scsi_set_sense (qc->dev, cmd,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } }Feel free to copy my arguments above.
I also checked VPD page 89h (ATA Information VPD page), and there are no bits there either to claim certain SAT version compliance.
And since this text is not in SAT-6, I can only imagine that they decided that is was not a good idea to not always honor
D_SENSE...(It does seem simpler to just always honor it...)
Kind regards,
Niklas
PATCH v3 2/6 ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
In reply to Igor PylypivCurrent ata_gen_passthru_sense() code performs two actions:
1. Generates sense data based on the ATA 'status' and ATA 'error' fields.
2. Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" with ATA taskfile fields.
The problem is that #1 generates sense data even when a valid sense data is already present (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID is set). Factoring out #2 into a separate function allows us to generate sense data only when there is no valid sense data (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID is not set).
As a bonus, we can now delete a FIXME comment in atapi_qc_complete() which states that we don't want to translate taskfile registers into sense descriptors for ATAPI.
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +86 -72
@@ -230,6 +230,80 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, information); } +/** +* ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields - Set ATA fields in sense buffer +* @qc: ATA PASS-THROUGH command. +* +* Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format +* sense data" with ATA taskfile fields. +* +* LOCKING: +* None. +*/ +static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ +struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd; +struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf; +unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; + +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +unsigned char *desc; +u8 len; + +/* descriptor format */ + len = sb[7 ]; + desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); +if (!desc) { +if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) +return ; + sb[7 ] = len +14 ; + desc = sb +8 + len; + } + desc[0 ] =9 ; + desc[1 ] =12 ; +/* +* Copy registers into sense buffer. +*/ + desc[2 ] =0x00 ; + desc[3 ] = tf->error; + desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; + desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; + desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; + desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; + desc[12 ] = tf->device; + desc[13 ] = tf->status; + +/* +* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes +* if applicable. +*/ +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; + desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; + desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; + desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; + desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; + } + }else { +/* Fixed sense format */ + sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[3 ] = tf->error; + sb[4 ] = tf->status; + sb[5 ] = tf->device; + sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; +if (tf->hob_nsect) + sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; +if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) + sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; + } + sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; + sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; + sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; + } +} +static void ata_scsi_set_invalid_field (struct ata_device *dev,struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,u16 field,u8 bit) {
@@ -837,10 +911,8 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(unsigned id, u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk,* ata_gen_passthru_sense - Generate check condition sense block. * @qc: Command that completed. * -* This function is specific to the ATA descriptor format sense -* block specified for the ATA pass through commands. Regardless -* of whether the command errored or not, return a sense -* block. Copy all controller registers into the sense +* This function is specific to the ATA pass through commands. +* Regardless of whether the command errored or not, return a sense * block. If there was no error, we get the request from an ATA * passthrough command, so we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR
@@ -875,63 +947,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } - -if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { -unsigned char *desc; -u8 len; - -/* descriptor format */ - len = sb[7 ]; - desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); -if (!desc) { -if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) -return ; - sb[7 ] = len +14 ; - desc = sb +8 + len; - } - desc[0 ] =9 ; - desc[1 ] =12 ; -/* -* Copy registers into sense buffer. -*/ - desc[2 ] =0x00 ; - desc[3 ] = tf->error; - desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; - desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; - desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; - desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; - desc[12 ] = tf->device; - desc[13 ] = tf->status; - -/* -* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes -* if applicable. -*/ -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; - desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; - desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; - desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; - desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; - } - }else { -/* Fixed sense format */ - sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; - sb[3 ] = tf->error; - sb[4 ] = tf->status; - sb[5 ] = tf->device; - sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; -if (tf->hob_nsect) - sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; -if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) - sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; - } - sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; - sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; - sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; - } }/**
@@ -1634,6 +1649,8 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd;int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || + (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID );/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we
@@ -1645,13 +1662,16 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)* asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_sense)) -ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); -else if (need_sense) + ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); +ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); + }else if (need_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); -else + }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */ cmd->result &=0x0000ffff ; + }ata_qc_done (qc); }
@@ -2590,14 +2610,8 @@ static void atapi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)/* handle completion from EH */ if (unlikely (err_mask || qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -/* FIXME: not quite right; we don't want the -* translation of taskfile registers into a -* sense descriptors, since that's only -* correct for ATA, not ATAPI -*/ +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ))ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); - }/* SCSI EH automatically locks door if sdev->locked is * set. Sometimes door lock request continues to
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Damien Le Moal
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 10 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Current
ata_gen_passthru_sense()code performs two actions:
1. Generates sense data based on the ATA 'status' and ATA 'error' fields.
2. Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" with ATA taskfile fields.The problem is that #1 generates sense data even when a valid sense data is already present (
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis set). Factoring out #2 into a separate function allows us to generate sense data only when there is no valid sense data (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis not set).
Quoted 8 lines
As a bonus, we can now delete a FIXME comment in
atapi_qc_complete()which states that we don't want to translate taskfile registers into sense descriptors for ATAPI.Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>
I wonder if we can find the patch that introduced the bug in the first place so that we can add a Fixes tag. I have not checked. This may have been wrong since a long time ago...
Quoted 212 lines
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +86
-72@@ -230,6 +230,80 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, information); } +/** +* ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields - Set ATA fields in sense buffer +* @qc: ATA PASS-THROUGH command. +* +* Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format +* sense data" with ATA taskfile fields. +* +* LOCKING: +* None. +*/ +static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ +struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd; +struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf; +unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; + +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +unsigned char *desc; +u8 len; + +/* descriptor format */ + len = sb[7 ]; + desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); +if (!desc) { +if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) +return ; + sb[7 ] = len +14 ; + desc = sb +8 + len; + } + desc[0 ] =9 ; + desc[1 ] =12 ; +/* +* Copy registers into sense buffer. +*/ + desc[2 ] =0x00 ; + desc[3 ] = tf->error; + desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; + desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; + desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; + desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; + desc[12 ] = tf->device; + desc[13 ] = tf->status; + +/* +* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes +* if applicable. +*/ +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; + desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; + desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; + desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; + desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; + } + }else { +/* Fixed sense format */ + sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[3 ] = tf->error; + sb[4 ] = tf->status; + sb[5 ] = tf->device; + sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; +if (tf->hob_nsect) + sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; +if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) + sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; + } + sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; + sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; + sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; + } +} +static void ata_scsi_set_invalid_field (struct ata_device *dev,struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,u16 field,u8 bit) {@@ -837,10 +911,8 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(unsigned id, u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk,* ata_gen_passthru_sense - Generate check condition sense block. * @qc: Command that completed. * -* This function is specific to the ATA descriptor format sense -* block specified for the ATA pass through commands. Regardless -* of whether the command errored or not, return a sense -* block. Copy all controller registers into the sense +* This function is specific to the ATA pass through commands. +* Regardless of whether the command errored or not, return a sense * block. If there was no error, we get the request from an ATA * passthrough command, so we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR @@ -875,63 +947,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } - -if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { -unsigned char *desc; -u8 len; - -/* descriptor format */ - len = sb[7 ]; - desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); -if (!desc) { -if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) -return ; - sb[7 ] = len +14 ; - desc = sb +8 + len; - } - desc[0 ] =9 ; - desc[1 ] =12 ; -/* -* Copy registers into sense buffer. -*/ - desc[2 ] =0x00 ; - desc[3 ] = tf->error; - desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; - desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; - desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; - desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; - desc[12 ] = tf->device; - desc[13 ] = tf->status; - -/* -* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes -* if applicable. -*/ -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; - desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; - desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; - desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; - desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; - } - }else { -/* Fixed sense format */ - sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; - sb[3 ] = tf->error; - sb[4 ] = tf->status; - sb[5 ] = tf->device; - sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; -if (tf->hob_nsect) - sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; -if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) - sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; - } - sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; - sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; - sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; - } }/** @@ -1634,6 +1649,8 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd;int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || + (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID );/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we @@ -1645,13 +1662,16 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)* asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_sense)) -ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); -else if (need_sense) + ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); +ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); + }else if (need_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); -else + }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */ cmd->result &=0x0000ffff ; + }ata_qc_done (qc); }@@ -2590,14 +2610,8 @@ static void atapi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)/* handle completion from EH */ if (unlikely (err_mask || qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -/* FIXME: not quite right; we don't want the -* translation of taskfile registers into a -* sense descriptors, since that's only -* correct for ATA, not ATAPI -*/ +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ))ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); - }/* SCSI EH automatically locks door if sdev->locked is * set. Sometimes door lock request continues to
Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 15 lines · Damien Le Moal
Quoted 14 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Current
ata_gen_passthru_sense()code performs two actions:
1. Generates sense data based on the ATA 'status' and ATA 'error' fields.
2. Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" with ATA taskfile fields.The problem is that #1 generates sense data even when a valid sense data is already present (
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis set). Factoring out #2 into a separate function allows us to generate sense data only when there is no valid sense data (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis not set).As a bonus, we can now delete a FIXME comment in
atapi_qc_complete()which states that we don't want to translate taskfile registers into sense descriptors for ATAPI.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>I wonder if we can find the patch that introduced the bug in the first place so that we can add a Fixes tag. I have not checked. This may have been wrong since a long time ago...
This code was first introduced in 2005 in commit b095518ef51c3 ("[libata] ATA passthru (arbitrary ATA command execution)").
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID was introduced a year later in commit 9ec957f2002b ("[PATCH] libata-eh-fw: add flags and operations for new EH").
IIUC, ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID has not been set for ATA drives until 2016 when the support for fetching the sense data was added in 5b01e4b9efa0 ("libata: Implement NCQ autosense") and commit e87fd28cf9a2d ("libata:
Implement support for sense data reporting").
To me none of the commits looks like a good candidate for the Fixes tag. What are your thoughts on this?
Quoted 211 lines
Quoted 211 lines
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +86
-72@@ -230,6 +230,80 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, information); } +/** +* ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields - Set ATA fields in sense buffer +* @qc: ATA PASS-THROUGH command. +* +* Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format +* sense data" with ATA taskfile fields. +* +* LOCKING: +* None. +*/ +static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ +struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd; +struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf; +unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; + +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +unsigned char *desc; +u8 len; + +/* descriptor format */ + len = sb[7 ]; + desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); +if (!desc) { +if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) +return ; + sb[7 ] = len +14 ; + desc = sb +8 + len; + } + desc[0 ] =9 ; + desc[1 ] =12 ; +/* +* Copy registers into sense buffer. +*/ + desc[2 ] =0x00 ; + desc[3 ] = tf->error; + desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; + desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; + desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; + desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; + desc[12 ] = tf->device; + desc[13 ] = tf->status; + +/* +* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes +* if applicable. +*/ +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; + desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; + desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; + desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; + desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; + } + }else { +/* Fixed sense format */ + sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[3 ] = tf->error; + sb[4 ] = tf->status; + sb[5 ] = tf->device; + sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; +if (tf->hob_nsect) + sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; +if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) + sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; + } + sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; + sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; + sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; + } +} +static void ata_scsi_set_invalid_field (struct ata_device *dev,struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,u16 field,u8 bit) {@@ -837,10 +911,8 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(unsigned id, u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk,* ata_gen_passthru_sense - Generate check condition sense block. * @qc: Command that completed. * -* This function is specific to the ATA descriptor format sense -* block specified for the ATA pass through commands. Regardless -* of whether the command errored or not, return a sense -* block. Copy all controller registers into the sense +* This function is specific to the ATA pass through commands. +* Regardless of whether the command errored or not, return a sense * block. If there was no error, we get the request from an ATA * passthrough command, so we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR @@ -875,63 +947,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } - -if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { -unsigned char *desc; -u8 len; - -/* descriptor format */ - len = sb[7 ]; - desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); -if (!desc) { -if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) -return ; - sb[7 ] = len +14 ; - desc = sb +8 + len; - } - desc[0 ] =9 ; - desc[1 ] =12 ; -/* -* Copy registers into sense buffer. -*/ - desc[2 ] =0x00 ; - desc[3 ] = tf->error; - desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; - desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; - desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; - desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; - desc[12 ] = tf->device; - desc[13 ] = tf->status; - -/* -* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes -* if applicable. -*/ -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; - desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; - desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; - desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; - desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; - } - }else { -/* Fixed sense format */ - sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; - sb[3 ] = tf->error; - sb[4 ] = tf->status; - sb[5 ] = tf->device; - sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; -if (tf->hob_nsect) - sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; -if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) - sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; - } - sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; - sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; - sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; - } }/** @@ -1634,6 +1649,8 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd;int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || + (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID );/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we @@ -1645,13 +1662,16 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)* asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_sense)) -ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); -else if (need_sense) + ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); +ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); + }else if (need_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); -else + }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */ cmd->result &=0x0000ffff ; + }ata_qc_done (qc); }@@ -2590,14 +2610,8 @@ static void atapi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)/* handle completion from EH */ if (unlikely (err_mask || qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -/* FIXME: not quite right; we don't want the -* translation of taskfile registers into a -* sense descriptors, since that's only -* correct for ATA, not ATAPI -*/ +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ))ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); - }
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +0
-0/* SCSI EH automatically locks door if sdev->locked is * set. Sometimes door lock request continues to Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Thanks,
Igor
Damien Le Moal
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 31 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Quoted 15 lines · Damien Le Moal
Quoted 14 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Current
ata_gen_passthru_sense()code performs two actions:
1. Generates sense data based on the ATA 'status' and ATA 'error' fields.
2. Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" with ATA taskfile fields.The problem is that #1 generates sense data even when a valid sense data is already present (
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis set). Factoring out #2 into a separate function allows us to generate sense data only when there is no valid sense data (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis not set).As a bonus, we can now delete a FIXME comment in
atapi_qc_complete()which states that we don't want to translate taskfile registers into sense descriptors for ATAPI.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>I wonder if we can find the patch that introduced the bug in the first place so that we can add a Fixes tag. I have not checked. This may have been wrong since a long time ago...
This code was first introduced in 2005 in commit
b095518ef51c3("[libata] ATA passthru (arbitrary ATA command execution)").
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDwas introduced a year later in commit9ec957f2002b("[PATCH] libata-eh-fw: add flags and operations for new EH").
Quoted 7 lines
IIUC,
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDhas not been set for ATA drives until 2016 when the support for fetching the sense data was added in5b01e4b9efa0("libata: Implement NCQ autosense") and commite87fd28cf9a2d("libata:
Implement support for sense data reporting").To me none of the commits looks like a good candidate for the Fixes tag. What are your thoughts on this?
Then let's just mark which LTS version need the patch. E.g. Cc: [email protected] # X.Y +
Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
In reply to Igor PylypivQuoted 194 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Current
ata_gen_passthru_sense()code performs two actions:
1. Generates sense data based on the ATA 'status' and ATA 'error' fields.
2. Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" with ATA taskfile fields.The problem is that #1 generates sense data even when a valid sense data is already present (
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis set). Factoring out #2 into a separate function allows us to generate sense data only when there is no valid sense data (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis not set).As a bonus, we can now delete a FIXME comment in
atapi_qc_complete()which states that we don't want to translate taskfile registers into sense descriptors for ATAPI.Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +78
-61@@ -230,6 +230,80 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, information); } +/** +* ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields - Set ATA fields in sense buffer +* @qc: ATA PASS-THROUGH command. +* +* Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format +* sense data" with ATA taskfile fields. +* +* LOCKING: +* None. +*/ +static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ +struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd; +struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf; +unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; + +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +unsigned char *desc; +u8 len; + +/* descriptor format */ + len = sb[7 ]; + desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); +if (!desc) { +if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) +return ; + sb[7 ] = len +14 ; + desc = sb +8 + len; + } + desc[0 ] =9 ; + desc[1 ] =12 ; +/* +* Copy registers into sense buffer. +*/ + desc[2 ] =0x00 ; + desc[3 ] = tf->error; + desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; + desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; + desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; + desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; + desc[12 ] = tf->device; + desc[13 ] = tf->status; + +/* +* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes +* if applicable. +*/ +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; + desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; + desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; + desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; + desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; + } + }else { +/* Fixed sense format */ + sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[3 ] = tf->error; + sb[4 ] = tf->status; + sb[5 ] = tf->device; + sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; +if (tf->hob_nsect) + sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; +if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) + sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; + } + sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; + sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; + sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; + } +} +static void ata_scsi_set_invalid_field (struct ata_device *dev,struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,u16 field,u8 bit) {@@ -837,10 +911,8 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(unsigned id, u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk,* ata_gen_passthru_sense - Generate check condition sense block. * @qc: Command that completed. * -* This function is specific to the ATA descriptor format sense -* block specified for the ATA pass through commands. Regardless -* of whether the command errored or not, return a sense -* block. Copy all controller registers into the sense +* This function is specific to the ATA pass through commands. +* Regardless of whether the command errored or not, return a sense * block. If there was no error, we get the request from an ATA * passthrough command, so we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR @@ -875,63 +947,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } - -if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { -unsigned char *desc; -u8 len; - -/* descriptor format */ - len = sb[7 ]; - desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); -if (!desc) { -if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) -return ; - sb[7 ] = len +14 ; - desc = sb +8 + len; - } - desc[0 ] =9 ; - desc[1 ] =12 ; -/* -* Copy registers into sense buffer. -*/ - desc[2 ] =0x00 ; - desc[3 ] = tf->error; - desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; - desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; - desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; - desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; - desc[12 ] = tf->device; - desc[13 ] = tf->status; - -/* -* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes -* if applicable. -*/ -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; - desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; - desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; - desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; - desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; - } - }else { -/* Fixed sense format */ - sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; - sb[3 ] = tf->error; - sb[4 ] = tf->status; - sb[5 ] = tf->device; - sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; -if (tf->hob_nsect) - sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; -if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) - sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; - } - sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; - sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; - sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; - } }/** @@ -1634,6 +1649,8 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd;int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || + (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID );/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 1668
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +4
-3@@ -1645,13 +1662,16 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)* asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_sense)) -ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); -else if (need_sense) + ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); +ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc);
This whole logic looks too complicated to me.
Can't we do something to make it easier to read, e.g. something like:
{
if (command_is_ata_passthru(cdb)) {
handle_passthru_completion(qc);
ata_qc_done();
return;
}
if (need_sense)
ata_gen_ata_sense(qc);
else
/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */
cmd->result &= 0x0000ffff;
ata_qc_done();
}And then put the complicated logic in handle_passthru_command() ?
/* CASES:
* a) IF error command (ERROR or DF set) and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID (SK+ASC+ASCQ) set:
* - don't touch SK/ASC/ASCQ in sense_buffer
* - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE)
* b) IF error command (ERROR or DF set) and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID (SK+ASC+ASCQ) not set:
* - generate the SK+ASC+ASCQ from ATA status and ATA error, and * - set CHECK_CONDITION in cmd->result (scsi_build_sense() does this) * - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE) * c) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID set, CK_COND set: * - don't touch SK/ASC/ASCQ in sense_buffer * - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE) * - we should probably set CHECK_CONDITION status byte in cmd->result here.... but not sure... * d) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID set, CK_COND not set: * - don't touch SK/ASC/ASCQ in sense_buffer * - don't fill ATA registers * - keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte, in cmd->result * e) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID not set, CK_COND set: * - set SK to "RECOVERED ERROR" ASCQ to "ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE", ASC to 0. * - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE) * - set CHECK_CONDITION status byte in cmd->result
* f) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID not set, CK_COND not set:
* - keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte, in cmd->result
*/
static void ata_handle_passthru_completion(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
So we should only copy the ATA registers when CK_COND is set, or if ERROR bit or DF bit was set. CK_COND being set in the cdb (input command) basically means that the user requested that the ATA registers should be copied into the sense buffer (in the result).
The only tricky case is if we should set CHECK_CONDITION in case c) or not. All other cases seems quite clear by looking at the SAT spec.
Quoted 29 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +4
-8+ }else if (need_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); - else + }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */ cmd->result &=0x0000ffff ; + }ata_qc_done (qc); }@@ -2590,14 +2610,8 @@ static void atapi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)/* handle completion from EH */ if (unlikely (err_mask || qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -/* FIXME: not quite right; we don't want the -* translation of taskfile registers into a -* sense descriptors, since that's only -* correct for ATA, not ATAPI -*/ +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ))ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); - }/* SCSI EH automatically locks door if sdev->locked is * set. Sometimes door lock request continues to Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 3 lines · Niklas Cassel
The only tricky case is if we should set
CHECK_CONDITIONin case c) or not. All other cases seems quite clear by looking at the SAT spec.
I think we should set CHECK_CONDITION in case c),
even if SK+ASCQ+ASC is not "ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE".
That way we at least align CK_COND with CHECK_CONDITION, which is most likely what the user (and spec writers) expect.
Kind regards,
Niklas
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
In reply to Niklas CasselQuoted 254 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 194 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Current
ata_gen_passthru_sense()code performs two actions:
1. Generates sense data based on the ATA 'status' and ATA 'error' fields.
2. Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format sense data" with ATA taskfile fields.The problem is that #1 generates sense data even when a valid sense data is already present (
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis set). Factoring out #2 into a separate function allows us to generate sense data only when there is no valid sense data (ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDis not set).As a bonus, we can now delete a FIXME comment in
atapi_qc_complete()which states that we don't want to translate taskfile registers into sense descriptors for ATAPI.Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +78
-61@@ -230,6 +230,80 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, information); } +/** +* ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields - Set ATA fields in sense buffer +* @qc: ATA PASS-THROUGH command. +* +* Populates "ATA Status Return sense data descriptor" / "Fixed format +* sense data" with ATA taskfile fields. +* +* LOCKING: +* None. +*/ +static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +{ +struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd; +struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf; +unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; + +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { +unsigned char *desc; +u8 len; + +/* descriptor format */ + len = sb[7 ]; + desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); +if (!desc) { +if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) +return ; + sb[7 ] = len +14 ; + desc = sb +8 + len; + } + desc[0 ] =9 ; + desc[1 ] =12 ; +/* +* Copy registers into sense buffer. +*/ + desc[2 ] =0x00 ; + desc[3 ] = tf->error; + desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; + desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; + desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; + desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; + desc[12 ] = tf->device; + desc[13 ] = tf->status; + +/* +* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes +* if applicable. +*/ +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; + desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; + desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; + desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; + desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; + } + }else { +/* Fixed sense format */ + sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; + sb[3 ] = tf->error; + sb[4 ] = tf->status; + sb[5 ] = tf->device; + sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; +if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { + sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; +if (tf->hob_nsect) + sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; +if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) + sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; + } + sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; + sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; + sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; + } +} +static void ata_scsi_set_invalid_field (struct ata_device *dev,struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,u16 field,u8 bit) {@@ -837,10 +911,8 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(unsigned id, u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk,* ata_gen_passthru_sense - Generate check condition sense block. * @qc: Command that completed. * -* This function is specific to the ATA descriptor format sense -* block specified for the ATA pass through commands. Regardless -* of whether the command errored or not, return a sense -* block. Copy all controller registers into the sense +* This function is specific to the ATA pass through commands. +* Regardless of whether the command errored or not, return a sense * block. If there was no error, we get the request from an ATA * passthrough command, so we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR @@ -875,63 +947,6 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ scsi_build_sense (cmd,1 ,RECOVERED_ERROR ,0 ,0x1D ); } - -if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) { -unsigned char *desc; -u8 len; - -/* descriptor format */ - len = sb[7 ]; - desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find (sb, len +8 ,9 ); -if (!desc) { -if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len +14 ) -return ; - sb[7 ] = len +14 ; - desc = sb +8 + len; - } - desc[0 ] =9 ; - desc[1 ] =12 ; -/* -* Copy registers into sense buffer. -*/ - desc[2 ] =0x00 ; - desc[3 ] = tf->error; - desc[5 ] = tf->nsect; - desc[7 ] = tf->lbal; - desc[9 ] = tf->lbam; - desc[11 ] = tf->lbah; - desc[12 ] = tf->device; - desc[13 ] = tf->status; - -/* -* Fill in Extend bit, and the high order bytes -* if applicable. -*/ -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - desc[2 ] |=0x01 ; - desc[4 ] = tf->hob_nsect; - desc[6 ] = tf->hob_lbal; - desc[8 ] = tf->hob_lbam; - desc[10 ] = tf->hob_lbah; - } - }else { -/* Fixed sense format */ - sb[0 ] |=0x80 ; - sb[3 ] = tf->error; - sb[4 ] = tf->status; - sb[5 ] = tf->device; - sb[6 ] = tf->nsect; -if (tf->flags &ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 ) { - sb[8 ] |=0x80 ; -if (tf->hob_nsect) - sb[8 ] |=0x40 ; -if (tf->hob_lbal || tf->hob_lbam || tf->hob_lbah) - sb[8 ] |=0x20 ; - } - sb[9 ] = tf->lbal; - sb[10 ] = tf->lbam; - sb[11 ] = tf->lbah; - } }/** @@ -1634,6 +1649,8 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd;int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || + (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID );/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 1668
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +4
-3@@ -1645,13 +1662,16 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)* asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_sense)) -ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); -else if (need_sense) + ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); +ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc);This whole logic looks too complicated to me.
Can't we do something to make it easier to read, e.g. something like:
{ if (command_is_ata_passthru(cdb)) { handle_passthru_completion(qc); ata_qc_done(); return; } if (need_sense) ata_gen_ata_sense(qc); else /* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */ cmd->result &= 0x0000ffff; ata_qc_done(); }And then put the complicated logic in
handle_passthru_command()?/* CASES:
* a) IF error command (ERROR or DF set) andATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID(SK+ASC+ASCQ) set:
* - don't touch SK/ASC/ASCQ insense_buffer
* - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based ondev->flagsATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE)
* b) IF error command (ERROR or DF set) andATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID(SK+ASC+ASCQ) not set:* - generate the SK+ASC+ASCQ from ATA status and ATA error, and * - set CHECK_CONDITION in cmd->result (scsi_build_sense() does this) * - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE) * c) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID set, CK_COND set: * - don't touch SK/ASC/ASCQ in sense_buffer * - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE) * - we should probably set CHECK_CONDITION status byte in cmd->result here.... but not sure... * d) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID set, CK_COND not set: * - don't touch SK/ASC/ASCQ in sense_buffer * - don't fill ATA registers * - keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte, in cmd->result * e) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID not set, CK_COND set: * - set SK to "RECOVERED ERROR" ASCQ to "ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE", ASC to 0. * - set ATA registers in fixed format or descriptor format (based on dev->flags ATA_DFLAG_D_SENSE) * - set CHECK_CONDITION status byte in cmd->result* f) IF success command (ERROR and DF not set), and
ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALIDnot set,CK_CONDnot set:
* - keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte, incmd->result
*/
static voidata_handle_passthru_completion(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
Quoted 8 lines
So we should only copy the ATA registers when
CK_CONDis set, or if ERROR bit or DF bit was set.CK_CONDbeing set in the cdb (input command) basically means that the user requested that the ATA registers should be copied into the sense buffer (in the result).The only tricky case is if we should set
CHECK_CONDITIONin case c) or not. All other cases seems quite clear by looking at the SAT spec.
Thank you, Niklas! I agree that this code is too complicated and should be simplified. I don't think we should change the code too much in this patch since it is going to be backported to stable releases.
Would you mind sending a patch for the proposed simplifications following this patch series?
I think there are some additional simplifications that can be made, e.g. both ata_gen_passthru_sense() and ata_gen_ata_sense() contain the same exact code:
/*
* Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits
* onto sense key, asc & ascq.
*/
if (qc->err_mask ||
tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) {
ata_to_sense_error(tf->status, tf->error,
&sense_key, &asc, &ascq);
ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq);
} else {Perhaps it can be moved into a separate function, etc.
Thanks,
Igor
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 30 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +4
-8+ }else if (need_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); - else + }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */ cmd->result &=0x0000ffff ; + }ata_qc_done (qc); }@@ -2590,14 +2610,8 @@ static void atapi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)/* handle completion from EH */ if (unlikely (err_mask || qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) { -/* FIXME: not quite right; we don't want the -* translation of taskfile registers into a -* sense descriptors, since that's only -* correct for ATA, not ATAPI -*/ +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ))ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc); - }/* SCSI EH automatically locks door if sdev->locked is * set. Sometimes door lock request continues to Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 8 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Thank you, Niklas! I agree that this code is too complicated and should be simplified. I don't think we should change the code too much in this patch since it is going to be backported to stable releases.
Would you mind sending a patch for the proposed simplifications following this patch series?
I would prefer if we changed it as part of this commit to be honest.
I also re-read the SAT spec, and found that it says that:
"""
If the CK_COND bit is set to:
a) one, then the SATL shall return a status of CHECK CONDITION upon ATA command completion, without interpreting the contents of the STATUS field and returning the ATA fields from the request completion in the sense data as specified in table 209; and
b) zero, then the SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status only if an error occurs in processing the command. See clause 11 for a description of ATA error conditions. """
So it seems quite clear that if CK_COND == 1, we should set CHECK CONDITION, so that answers the question/uncertainty I asked/expressed in earlier emails.
I think this patch (which should be applied on top of your v3 series), makes the code way easier to read/understand:
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +11 -10
@@ -1659,26 +1656,27 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd; -int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && - !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); -int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || - (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +bool have_sense = qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ; +bool is_ata_passthru = cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 || cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 ; +bool is_ck_cond_request = cdb[2 ] &0x20 ; +bool is_error = qc->err_mask !=0 ;/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we -* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND =1], a check +* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND=1], a check * condition is generated and the ATA register values are returned * whether the command completed successfully or not. If there -* was no error, we use the following sense data: +* was no error, and CK_COND=1, we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR * asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ -if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +if (is_ata_passthru && (is_ck_cond_request || is_error || have_sense)) { +if (!have_sense)ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc);ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); - }else if (need_sense) { +if (is_ck_cond_request) +set_status_byte (qc->scsicmd,SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION ); + }else if (is_error && !have_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 23 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 8 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Thank you, Niklas! I agree that this code is too complicated and should be simplified. I don't think we should change the code too much in this patch since it is going to be backported to stable releases.
Would you mind sending a patch for the proposed simplifications following this patch series?
I would prefer if we changed it as part of this commit to be honest.
I also re-read the SAT spec, and found that it says that:
"""
If theCK_CONDbit is set to:
a) one, then the SATL shall return a status of CHECK CONDITION upon ATA command completion, without interpreting the contents of the STATUS field and returning the ATA fields from the request completion in the sense data as specified in table 209; and
b) zero, then the SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status only if an error occurs in processing the command. See clause 11 for a description of ATA error conditions. """
Quoted 7 lines
So it seems quite clear that if
CK_COND== 1, we should set CHECK CONDITION, so that answers the question/uncertainty I asked/expressed in earlier emails.I think this patch (which should be applied on top of your v3 series), makes the code way easier to read/understand:
Agree, having self-explanatory variable names makes the code much more readable. I'll add the patch in v4.
Do you mind if I set you as the author of the patch with the corresponding Signed-off-by tag?
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +6
-6@@ -1659,26 +1656,27 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd; -int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && - !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); -int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || - (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +bool have_sense = qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ; +bool is_ata_passthru = cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 || cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 ; +bool is_ck_cond_request = cdb[2 ] &0x20 ; +bool is_error = qc->err_mask !=0 ;/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we -* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND =1], a check +* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND=1], a check * condition is generated and the ATA register values are returned * whether the command completed successfully or not. If there -* was no error, we use the following sense data: +* was no error, and CK_COND=1, we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR * asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 1678
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +4
-4-if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +if (is_ata_passthru && (is_ck_cond_request || is_error || have_sense)) { +if (!have_sense)ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc);ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); - }else if (need_sense) { +if (is_ck_cond_request) +set_status_byte (qc->scsicmd,SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION );
SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION will be set by ata_gen_passthru_sense(). Perhaps we can move the SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION setting into else if?
if (is_ata_passthru && (is_ck_cond_request || is_error || have_sense)) {
if (!have_sense)
ata_gen_passthru_sense(qc);
else if (is_ck_cond_request)
set_status_byte(qc->scsicmd, SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION);
ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields(qc);
} else if (is_error && !have_sense) {drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 1682
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +1
-0+ }else if (is_error && !have_sense) {ata_gen_ata_sense (qc); }else {/* Keep the SCSI ML and status byte, clear host byte. */
Thanks,
Igor
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 32 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Quoted 23 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 8 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Thank you, Niklas! I agree that this code is too complicated and should be simplified. I don't think we should change the code too much in this patch since it is going to be backported to stable releases.
Would you mind sending a patch for the proposed simplifications following this patch series?
I would prefer if we changed it as part of this commit to be honest.
I also re-read the SAT spec, and found that it says that:
"""
If theCK_CONDbit is set to:
a) one, then the SATL shall return a status of CHECK CONDITION upon ATA command completion, without interpreting the contents of the STATUS field and returning the ATA fields from the request completion in the sense data as specified in table 209; and
b) zero, then the SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status only if an error occurs in processing the command. See clause 11 for a description of ATA error conditions. """Quoted 7 lines
So it seems quite clear that if
CK_COND== 1, we should set CHECK CONDITION, so that answers the question/uncertainty I asked/expressed in earlier emails.I think this patch (which should be applied on top of your v3 series), makes the code way easier to read/understand:
Quoted 5 lines
Agree, having self-explanatory variable names makes the code much more readable. I'll add the patch in v4.
Do you mind if I set you as the author of the patch with the corresponding Signed-off-by tag?
I still think that you are the author.
But if you want, feel free to add me as: Co-developed-by (which would also require you to add my Signed-off-by), see:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 34 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +8
-9@@ -1659,26 +1656,27 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd; -int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && - !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); -int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || - (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +bool have_sense = qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ; +bool is_ata_passthru = cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 || cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 ; +bool is_ck_cond_request = cdb[2 ] &0x20 ; +bool is_error = qc->err_mask !=0 ;/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we -* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND =1], a check +* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND=1], a check * condition is generated and the ATA register values are returned * whether the command completed successfully or not. If there -* was no error, we use the following sense data: +* was no error, and CK_COND=1, we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR * asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ -if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +if (is_ata_passthru && (is_ck_cond_request || is_error || have_sense)) { +if (!have_sense)
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 1678
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +2
-1ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc);ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); - }else if (need_sense) { +if (is_ck_cond_request) +set_status_byte (qc->scsicmd,SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION );
SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITIONwill be set byata_gen_passthru_sense(). Perhaps we can move theSAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITIONsetting into else if?
I think it is fine that:
if (is_ck_cond_request)
set_status_byte(qc->scsicmd, SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION);
might set SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION even if it is already set.
Personally, I think that my suggestion is slightly clearer when it comes to highlight the behavior of CK_COND. (CK_COND will set CHECK_CONDITION, regardless if successful command or error command, and regardless if we already had sense or not.)
And considering that we finally make this hard to read code slightly more readable than it was to start off with, I would prefer my alternative.
Kind regards,
Niklas
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1
Quoted 36 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 35 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Quoted 23 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 8 lines · Igor Pylypiv
Thank you, Niklas! I agree that this code is too complicated and should be simplified. I don't think we should change the code too much in this patch since it is going to be backported to stable releases.
Would you mind sending a patch for the proposed simplifications following this patch series?
I would prefer if we changed it as part of this commit to be honest.
I also re-read the SAT spec, and found that it says that:
"""
If theCK_CONDbit is set to:
a) one, then the SATL shall return a status of CHECK CONDITION upon ATA command completion, without interpreting the contents of the STATUS field and returning the ATA fields from the request completion in the sense data as specified in table 209; and
b) zero, then the SATL shall terminate the command with CHECK CONDITION status only if an error occurs in processing the command. See clause 11 for a description of ATA error conditions. """Quoted 7 lines
So it seems quite clear that if
CK_COND== 1, we should set CHECK CONDITION, so that answers the question/uncertainty I asked/expressed in earlier emails.I think this patch (which should be applied on top of your v3 series), makes the code way easier to read/understand:
Agree, having self-explanatory variable names makes the code much more readable. I'll add the patch in v4.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Do you mind if I set you as the author of the patch with the corresponding Signed-off-by tag?
I still think that you are the author.
But if you want, feel free to add me as: Co-developed-by (which would also require you to add my Signed-off-by), see:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
Sounds good! Added the Co-developed-by abd Signed-off-by tags in v4. Thanks!
Quoted 50 lines
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 35 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +8
-9@@ -1659,26 +1656,27 @@ static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd; -int need_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) && - !(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); -int need_passthru_sense = (qc->err_mask !=0 ) || - (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ); +bool have_sense = qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID ; +bool is_ata_passthru = cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 || cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 ; +bool is_ck_cond_request = cdb[2 ] &0x20 ; +bool is_error = qc->err_mask !=0 ;/* For ATA pass thru (SAT) commands, generate a sense block if * user mandated it or if there's an error. Note that if we -* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND =1], a check +* generate because the user forced us to [CK_COND=1], a check * condition is generated and the ATA register values are returned * whether the command completed successfully or not. If there -* was no error, we use the following sense data: +* was no error, and CK_COND=1, we use the following sense data: * sk = RECOVERED ERROR * asc,ascq = ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE */ -if (((cdb[0 ] ==ATA_16 ) || (cdb[0 ] ==ATA_12 )) && - ((cdb[2 ] &0x20 ) || need_passthru_sense)) { -if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID )) +if (is_ata_passthru && (is_ck_cond_request || is_error || have_sense)) { +if (!have_sense)Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c static void ata_scsi_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 1678
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +2
-1ata_gen_passthru_sense (qc);ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (qc); - }else if (need_sense) { +if (is_ck_cond_request) +set_status_byte (qc->scsicmd,SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION );
SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITIONwill be set byata_gen_passthru_sense(). Perhaps we can move theSAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITIONsetting into else if?I think it is fine that:
if (is_ck_cond_request)set_status_byte(qc->scsicmd, SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION);might set
SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITIONeven if it is already set.
Quoted 8 lines
Personally, I think that my suggestion is slightly clearer when it comes to highlight the behavior of
CK_COND. (CK_CONDwill setCHECK_CONDITION, regardless if successful command or error command, and regardless if we already had sense or not.)And considering that we finally make this hard to read code slightly more readable than it was to start off with, I would prefer my alternative.
It makes senes. Added the patch in v4. Thank you!
Quoted 3 lines
Kind regards,
Niklas
PATCH v3 3/6 ata: libata-scsi: Remove redundant sense_buffer memsets
In reply to Igor PylypivSCSI layer clears sense_buffer in scsi_queue_rq() so there is no need for libata to clear it again.
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +0 -5
@@ -926,11 +926,8 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf; -unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; -memset (sb,0 ,SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE ); -/* * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq.
@@ -968,8 +965,6 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)u64 block;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; -memset (sb,0 ,SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE ); -if (ata_dev_disabled (dev)) {/* Device disabled after error recovery */ /* LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, HARD RESET REQUIRED */
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
PATCH v3 4/6 ata: libata-scsi: Do not pass ATA device id to ata_to_sense_error()
In reply to Igor PylypivATA device id is not used in ata_to_sense_error().
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +4 -5
@@ -785,7 +785,6 @@ static void ata_qc_set_pc_nbytes(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)/** * ata_to_sense_error - convert ATA error to SCSI error -* @id: ATA device number * @drv_stat: value contained in ATA status register * @drv_err: value contained in ATA error register * @sk: the sense key we'll fill out
@@ -799,8 +798,8 @@ static void ata_qc_set_pc_nbytes(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)* LOCKING: * spin_lock_irqsave(host lock) */ -static void ata_to_sense_error (unsigned id,u8 drv_stat,u8 drv_err,u8 *sk, -u8 *asc,u8 *ascq) +static void ata_to_sense_error (u8 drv_stat,u8 drv_err,u8 *sk,u8 *asc, +u8 *ascq) {int i;
@@ -934,7 +933,7 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ if (qc->err_mask || tf->status & (ATA_BUSY |ATA_DF |ATA_ERR |ATA_DRQ )) { -ata_to_sense_error (qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error, +ata_to_sense_error (tf->status, tf->error, &sense_key, &asc, &ascq);ata_scsi_set_sense (qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); }else {
@@ -976,7 +975,7 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ if (qc->err_mask || tf->status & (ATA_BUSY |ATA_DF |ATA_ERR |ATA_DRQ )) { -ata_to_sense_error (qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error, +ata_to_sense_error (tf->status, tf->error, &sense_key, &asc, &ascq);ata_scsi_set_sense (dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq); }else {
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
PATCH v3 5/6 ata: libata: Set ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED in fill_result_tf()
In reply to Igor PylypivATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED is not specific to ahci and can be used generally to check if qc->result_tf contains valid data.
--- drivers/ata/libahci.c | 10 ---------- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libahci.c +0 -10
@@ -2075,13 +2075,6 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)struct ahci_port_priv *pp = qc->ap->private_data;u8 *rx_fis = pp->rx_fis; -/* -* rtf may already be filled (e.g. for successful NCQ commands). -* If that is the case, we have nothing to do. -*/ -if (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ) -return ; -if (pp->fbs_enabled) rx_fis += qc->dev->link->pmp *AHCI_RX_FIS_SZ ;
@@ -2095,7 +2088,6 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) !(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_EH)) {ata_tf_from_fis (rx_fis +RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP , &qc->result_tf); qc->result_tf.status = (rx_fis +RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP )[15 ]; - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ;return ; }
@@ -2118,12 +2110,10 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ qc->result_tf.status = fis[2 ]; qc->result_tf.error = fis[3 ]; - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ;return ; }ata_tf_from_fis (rx_fis +RX_FIS_D2H_REG , &qc->result_tf); - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; }static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf (struct ata_port *ap,u64 done_mask)
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +8 -0
@@ -4801,8 +4801,16 @@ static void fill_result_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; +/* +* rtf may already be filled (e.g. for successful NCQ commands). +* If that is the case, we have nothing to do. +*/ +if (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ) +return ; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags; ap->ops->qc_fill_rtf (qc); + qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; }static void ata_verify_xfer (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 5/6] ata: libata: Set ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED in fill_result_tf()
Quoted 56 lines · Igor Pylypiv
ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDis not specific to ahci and can be used generally to check ifqc->result_tfcontains valid data.Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libahci.c | 10 ---------- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libahci.c +0
-10@@ -2075,13 +2075,6 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)struct ahci_port_priv *pp = qc->ap->private_data;u8 *rx_fis = pp->rx_fis; -/* -* rtf may already be filled (e.g. for successful NCQ commands). -* If that is the case, we have nothing to do. -*/ -if (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ) -return ; -if (pp->fbs_enabled) rx_fis += qc->dev->link->pmp *AHCI_RX_FIS_SZ ;@@ -2095,7 +2088,6 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) !(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_EH)) {ata_tf_from_fis (rx_fis +RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP , &qc->result_tf); qc->result_tf.status = (rx_fis +RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP )[15 ]; - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ;return ; }@@ -2118,12 +2110,10 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ qc->result_tf.status = fis[2 ]; qc->result_tf.error = fis[3 ]; - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ;return ; }ata_tf_from_fis (rx_fis +RX_FIS_D2H_REG , &qc->result_tf); - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; }static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf (struct ata_port *ap,u64 done_mask)drivers/ata/libata-core.c +0
-0@@ -4801,8 +4801,16 @@ static void fill_result_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {
drivers/ata/libata-core.c static void fill_result_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 4811
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +7
-0struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; +/* +* rtf may already be filled (e.g. for successful NCQ commands). +* If that is the case, we have nothing to do. +*/ +if (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ) +return ; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags;
One functional change that I can see from this is that after this commit, we will no longer do: qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags;
if ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED was set.
e.g. ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields() and ata_gen_ata_sense() makes use of result_tf->flags, so we probably still want to do this.
Perhaps keep this function as you have it and simply do:
drivers/ata/libahci.c +2 -0
@@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf(struct ata_port *ap, u64 done_mask)if (qc &&ata_is_ncq (qc->tf.protocol)) { qc->result_tf.status = status; qc->result_tf.error = error; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags; qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; } done_mask &= ~(1ULL << tag);
@@ -2172,6 +2173,7 @@ static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf(struct ata_port *ap, u64 done_mask) fis +=RX_FIS_SDB ; qc->result_tf.status = fis[2 ]; qc->result_tf.error = fis[3 ]; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags; qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; } done_mask &= ~(1ULL << tag);
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +1
-0ap->ops->qc_fill_rtf (qc); + qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; }static void ata_verify_xfer (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ata: libata: Set ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED in fill_result_tf()
Quoted 59 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 58 lines · Igor Pylypiv
ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDis not specific to ahci and can be used generally to check ifqc->result_tfcontains valid data.Reviewed-by Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libahci.c | 10 ---------- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)drivers/ata/libahci.c +0
-10@@ -2075,13 +2075,6 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)struct ahci_port_priv *pp = qc->ap->private_data;u8 *rx_fis = pp->rx_fis; -/* -* rtf may already be filled (e.g. for successful NCQ commands). -* If that is the case, we have nothing to do. -*/ -if (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ) -return ; -if (pp->fbs_enabled) rx_fis += qc->dev->link->pmp *AHCI_RX_FIS_SZ ;@@ -2095,7 +2088,6 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) !(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_EH)) {ata_tf_from_fis (rx_fis +RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP , &qc->result_tf); qc->result_tf.status = (rx_fis +RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP )[15 ]; - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ;return ; }@@ -2118,12 +2110,10 @@ static void ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)*/ qc->result_tf.status = fis[2 ]; qc->result_tf.error = fis[3 ]; - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ;return ; }ata_tf_from_fis (rx_fis +RX_FIS_D2H_REG , &qc->result_tf); - qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; }static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf (struct ata_port *ap,u64 done_mask)drivers/ata/libata-core.c +0
-0@@ -4801,8 +4801,16 @@ static void fill_result_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) {struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/ata/libata-core.c static void fill_result_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) · line 4811
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +7
-0+/* +* rtf may already be filled (e.g. for successful NCQ commands). +* If that is the case, we have nothing to do. +*/ +if (qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ) +return ; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags;One functional change that I can see from this is that after this commit, we will no longer do:
qc->result_tf.flags=qc->tf.flags;
ifATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDwas set.
Nice catch, Niklas! I'll fix it in v4. Thank you!
Quoted 38 lines
e.g.
ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields()andata_gen_ata_sense()makes use ofresult_tf->flags, so we probably still want to do this.Perhaps keep this function as you have it and simply do:
drivers/ata/libahci.c +2
-0@@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf(struct ata_port *ap, u64 done_mask)if (qc &&ata_is_ncq (qc->tf.protocol)) { qc->result_tf.status = status; qc->result_tf.error = error; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags; qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; } done_mask &= ~(1ULL << tag);@@ -2172,6 +2173,7 @@ static void ahci_qc_ncq_fill_rtf(struct ata_port *ap, u64 done_mask) fis +=RX_FIS_SDB ; qc->result_tf.status = fis[2 ]; qc->result_tf.error = fis[3 ]; + qc->result_tf.flags = qc->tf.flags; qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; } done_mask &= ~(1ULL << tag);Quoted 11 lines
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +1
-0ap->ops->qc_fill_rtf (qc); + qc->flags |=ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED ; }static void ata_verify_xfer (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
PATCH v3 6/6 ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
In reply to Igor Pylypivqc->result_tf contents are only valid when the ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED flag is set. The ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED flag should be always set for commands that failed or for commands that have the ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF flag set.
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +18 -0
@@ -242,10 +242,16 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev,*/ static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot set ATA PT sense fields.\n" ); +return ; + } +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) {unsigned char *desc;u8 len;
@@ -923,10 +929,16 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk, u8 *asc,*/ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate ATA PT sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq.
@@ -970,6 +982,12 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)ata_scsi_set_sense (dev, cmd,NOT_READY ,0x04 ,0x21 );return ; } + +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. */
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
Quoted 5 lines · Igor Pylypiv
qc->result_tfcontents are only valid when theATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag is set. TheATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag should be always set for commands that failed or for commands that have theATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TFflag set.Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>
Please change "RTF" to "result TF" in the messages below, to be clear (RTF is not). Feel free to split the ata_dev_dbg() lines after "dev," to avoid long lines.
With that:
Quoted 55 lines
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +18
-0@@ -242,10 +242,16 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev,*/ static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot set ATA PT sense fields.\n" ); +return ; + } +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) {unsigned char *desc;u8 len;@@ -923,10 +929,16 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk, u8 *asc,*/ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate ATA PT sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. @@ -970,6 +982,12 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)ata_scsi_set_sense (dev, cmd,NOT_READY ,0x04 ,0x21 );return ; } + +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. */
Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
Quoted 9 lines · Damien Le Moal
Quoted 5 lines · Igor Pylypiv
qc->result_tfcontents are only valid when theATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag is set. TheATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag should be always set for commands that failed or for commands that have theATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TFflag set.Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>Please change "RTF" to "result TF" in the messages below, to be clear (RTF is not). Feel free to split the
ata_dev_dbg()lines after "dev," to avoid long lines.
Thanks Damien! I wrote "result taskfile" first, then changed it to "result TF", and then to "RTF" to shorten the lines :)
I'll change it to "result TF" with the line split in v3.
Quoted 52 lines
With that:
Reviewed-by Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>Quoted 47 lines
--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +13
-0@@ -242,10 +242,16 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev,*/ static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot set ATA PT sense fields.\n" ); +return ; + } +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) {unsigned char *desc;u8 len;@@ -923,10 +929,16 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk, u8 *asc,*/ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate ATA PT sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. @@ -970,6 +982,12 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)ata_scsi_set_sense (dev, cmd,NOT_READY ,0x04 ,0x21 );return ; } +
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +5
-0+if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. */ Signature · 2 lines
Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
Thanks,
Igor
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
In reply to Igor PylypivQuoted 9 lines · Igor Pylypiv
qc->result_tfcontents are only valid when theATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag is set. TheATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag should be always set for commands that failed or for commands that have theATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TFflag set.Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
Cheers,
Hannes
Signature · 4 lines
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
Niklas Cassel
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
In reply to Igor PylypivQuoted 63 lines · Igor Pylypiv
qc->result_tfcontents are only valid when theATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag is set. TheATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag should be always set for commands that failed or for commands that have theATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TFflag set.Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +18
-0@@ -242,10 +242,16 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev,*/ static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot set ATA PT sense fields.\n" ); +return ; + } +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) {unsigned char *desc;u8 len;@@ -923,10 +929,16 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk, u8 *asc,*/ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate ATA PT sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. @@ -970,6 +982,12 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)ata_scsi_set_sense (dev, cmd,NOT_READY ,0x04 ,0x21 );return ; } + +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. */ Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
In order to be more consistent with existing prints in this file, please do not capitalize the first letter, and remove the punctuation.
Kind regards,
Niklas
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: libata-scsi: Check ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED before using result_tf
Quoted 59 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 58 lines · Igor Pylypiv
qc->result_tfcontents are only valid when theATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag is set. TheATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLEDflag should be always set for commands that failed or for commands that have theATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TFflag set.Signed-off-by Igor Pylypiv <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +18
-0@@ -242,10 +242,16 @@ void ata_scsi_set_sense_information(struct ata_device *dev,*/ static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;unsigned char *sb = cmd->sense_buffer; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot set ATA PT sense fields.\n" ); +return ; + } +if ((sb[0 ] &0x7f ) >=0x72 ) {unsigned char *desc;u8 len;@@ -923,10 +929,16 @@ static void ata_to_sense_error(u8 drv_stat, u8 drv_err, u8 *sk, u8 *asc,*/ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { +struct ata_device *dev = qc->dev;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = qc->scsicmd;struct ata_taskfile *tf = &qc->result_tf;u8 sense_key, asc, ascq; +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate ATA PT sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits * onto sense key, asc & ascq. @@ -970,6 +982,12 @@ static void ata_gen_ata_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)ata_scsi_set_sense (dev, cmd,NOT_READY ,0x04 ,0x21 );return ; } + +if (!(qc->flags &ATA_QCFLAG_RTF_FILLED )) { +ata_dev_dbg (dev,"Missing RTF: cannot generate sense data.\n" ); +return ; + } +/* Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +0
-0* onto sense key, asc & ascq. */ Signature · 1 line
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-googIn order to be more consistent with existing prints in this file, please do not capitalize the first letter, and remove the punctuation.
Thanks! I'll remove periods and will keep the colons.
Quoted 4 lines
Kind regards,
Niklas