ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos4412 SoCS
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/2 ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos4412 SoCS
As per the Exynos 4412 user manaual add missing cache information to the Exynos 4412 SoC.
- Each Cortex-A9 core has 32KB of L1 instruction cache available and 32KB of L1 data cache available.
- Along with 1M unified L2 cache.
Features of ARM Cortex-A9
- Optimized L1 caches for system performance and power.
- Integrated 1 MB L2 Cache using standard compiled RAMs.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412.dtsi | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412.dtsi +37 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ cpu0: cpu@a00 { clock-names = "cpu"; operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2>; }; cpu1: cpu@a01 {
@@ -58,6 +65,13 @@ cpu1: cpu@a01 { clock-names = "cpu"; operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2>; }; cpu2: cpu@a02 {
@@ -68,6 +82,13 @@ cpu2: cpu@a02 { clock-names = "cpu"; operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2>; }; cpu3: cpu@a03 {
@@ -78,6 +99,22 @@ cpu3: cpu@a03 { clock-names = "cpu"; operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2>; + }; + + L2: l2-cache { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x100000>; /* L2, 1M */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; }; };
base-commit: dc1c8034e31b14a2e5e212104ec508aec44ce1b9
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
PATCH 2/2 ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
As per Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.
Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.
--- .../arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi +74 -0
@@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ cpu0: cpu@100 { reg = <0x100>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -72,6 +79,13 @@ cpu1: cpu@101 { reg = <0x101>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -85,6 +99,13 @@ cpu2: cpu@102 { reg = <0x102>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -98,6 +119,13 @@ cpu3: cpu@103 { reg = <0x103>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -111,6 +139,13 @@ cpu4: cpu@0 { reg = <0x0>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -124,6 +159,13 @@ cpu5: cpu@1 { reg = <0x1>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -137,6 +179,13 @@ cpu6: cpu@2 { reg = <0x2>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
@@ -150,12 +199,37 @@ cpu7: cpu@3 { reg = <0x3>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; dynamic-power-coefficient = <310>; }; + + L2_a7: l2-cache-cluster0 { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x80000>; /* L2. 512 KB */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; + }; + + L2_a15: l2-cache-cluster1 { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x200000>; /* L2, 2M */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; + }; }; };
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Quoted 10 lines · Anand Moon
As per Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.
Quoted 7 lines
Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit 5f41f9198f29 ("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.
Quoted 134 lines
--- .../arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi +67
-0@@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ cpu0: cpu@100 { reg = <0x100>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -72,6 +79,13 @@ cpu1: cpu@101 { reg = <0x101>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -85,6 +99,13 @@ cpu2: cpu@102 { reg = <0x102>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -98,6 +119,13 @@ cpu3: cpu@103 { reg = <0x103>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -111,6 +139,13 @@ cpu4: cpu@0 { reg = <0x0>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -124,6 +159,13 @@ cpu5: cpu@1 { reg = <0x1>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -137,6 +179,13 @@ cpu6: cpu@2 { reg = <0x2>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -150,12 +199,37 @@ cpu7: cpu@3 { reg = <0x3>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; dynamic-power-coefficient = <310>; }; + + L2_a7: l2-cache-cluster0 { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x80000>; /* L2. 512 KB */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; + }; + + L2_a15: l2-cache-cluster1 {
arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi cpu7: cpu@3 { · line 235
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi +7
-0+ compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x200000>; /* L2, 2M */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; + }; }; };
Best regards
Signature · 2 lines
Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Hi Marek,
Quoted 19 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 16 lines · Anand Moon
As per Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.
Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Thanks
-Anand
Quoted 151 lines
Quoted 135 lines
--- .../arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi +67
-0@@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ cpu0: cpu@100 { reg = <0x100>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -72,6 +79,13 @@ cpu1: cpu@101 { reg = <0x101>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -85,6 +99,13 @@ cpu2: cpu@102 { reg = <0x102>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -98,6 +119,13 @@ cpu3: cpu@103 { reg = <0x103>; clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a7>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a7_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -111,6 +139,13 @@ cpu4: cpu@0 { reg = <0x0>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -124,6 +159,13 @@ cpu5: cpu@1 { reg = <0x1>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -137,6 +179,13 @@ cpu6: cpu@2 { reg = <0x2>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */@@ -150,12 +199,37 @@ cpu7: cpu@3 { reg = <0x3>; clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>; clock-frequency = <1800000000>; + d-cache-line-size = <32>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-sets = <32>; + i-cache-line-size = <32>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + i-cache-sets = <32>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_a15>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; operating-points-v2 = <&cluster_a15_opp_table>; #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>; dynamic-power-coefficient = <310>; }; + + L2_a7: l2-cache-cluster0 { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x80000>; /* L2. 512 KB */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; + }; + + L2_a15: l2-cache-cluster1 {arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi cpu7: cpu@3 { · line 235
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-cpus.dtsi +7
-0+ compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <2>; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x200000>; /* L2, 2M */ + cache-line-size = <64>; + cache-sets = <512>; + }; }; };Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Krzysztof Kozlowski
maintainerRe: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Quoted 7 lines
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Ok, If I am not wrong icache_size is hard-coded in the above commit.
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND
+.globl icache_size
+ .data
+ .align 2
+icache_size:
+ .long 64
+ .text
+#endif
In the check_cpu_icache_size function, we read the control reg and recalculate the icache_size.
if there mismatch we re-apply the Icache_size,
So dts passed values do not apply over here,
Quoted 3 lines
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Thanks
-Anand
Krzysztof Kozlowski
maintainerRe: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Quoted 59 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Quoted 7 lines
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Ok, If I am not wrong
icache_sizeis hard-coded in the above commit.(quoted diff) +8
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND +.globl icache_size + .data + .align 2 +icache_size: + .long 64 + .text +#endif
Quoted 5 lines
In the
check_cpu_icache_sizefunction, we read the control reg and recalculate theicache_size.
if there mismatch we re-apply theIcache_size,So dts passed values do not apply over here,
So you provide incorrect values in terms of them being ignored? Then do not provide at all.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 61 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 59 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per the Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Quoted 7 lines
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Ok, If I am not wrong
icache_sizeis hard-coded in the above commit.(quoted diff) +8
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND +.globl icache_size + .data + .align 2 +icache_size: + .long 64 + .text +#endif
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
In the
check_cpu_icache_sizefunction, we read the control reg and recalculate theicache_size.
if there mismatch we re-apply theIcache_size,So dts passed values do not apply over here,
So you provide incorrect values in terms of them being ignored? Then do not provide at all.
I will drop the icache and dcache values and just pass the L2_a7 and L2_a15, value
Is this ok for you?
Earlier, I have tried to verify this information in /sys and /proc to verify the changes as ARM does not populate this information.
Quoted 3 lines
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Thanks
-Anand
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Hi Krzysztof, Marek,
Quoted 74 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 61 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 59 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per the Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Quoted 7 lines
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Ok, If I am not wrong
icache_sizeis hard-coded in the above commit.(quoted diff) +8
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND +.globl icache_size + .data + .align 2 +icache_size: + .long 64 + .text +#endifQuoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
In the
check_cpu_icache_sizefunction, we read the control reg and recalculate theicache_size.
if there mismatch we re-apply theIcache_size,So dts passed values do not apply over here,
So you provide incorrect values in terms of them being ignored? Then do not provide at all.
Quoted 7 lines
I will drop the icache and dcache values and just pass the
L2_a7andL2_a15, value
Is this ok for you?Earlier, I have tried to verify this information in /sys and /proc to verify the changes as ARM does not populate this information.
Here's an article that provides detailed insights into the cache feature.
[0] http://jake.dothome.co.kr/cache4/
The values associated with L1 and L2 caches indicate their respective sizes, as specified in the ARM Technical Reference Manual (TRM) below.
Cortex-A15 L2 cache controller
[0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a15-l2-cache-controller
Cortex-A7 L2 cache controller
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a7-l2-cache-controller
These changes help define a fixed cache size, ensuring that active pages are mapped correctly within the expected cache boundaries.
Here is the small test case using perf
Before
$ sudo perf stat -e L1-dcache-loads,L1-dcache-load-misses ./fact
Simulated Cache Miss Time (avg): 4766632 ns
Factorial(10) = 3628800
Performance counter stats for './fact':
926328 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-loads/
<not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-loads/
(0.00%)
16510 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-load-misses/ #
1.78% of all L1-dcache accesses
<not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-load-misses/
(0.00%)
0.008970031 seconds time elapsed
0.000000000 seconds user
0.009673000 seconds sysAfter
$ sudo perf stat -e L1-dcache-loads,L1-dcache-load-misses ./fact Simulated Cache Miss Time (avg): 4623272 ns Factorial(10) = 3628800
Performance counter stats for './fact':
930570 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-loads/
<not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-loads/
(0.00%)
4755 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-load-misses/ #
0.51% of all L1-dcache accesses
<not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-load-misses/
(0.00%)
0.011068250 seconds time elapsed
0.000000000 seconds user
0.010793000 seconds sysThanks
-Anand
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Hi Anand,
Thanks for working on this!
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 07:29:31PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
[ ... ]
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines · Anand Moon
Quoted 17 lines
As per the Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
I do not have access to the 5422 manual unfortunately, but if I add some prints in the code from the commit Marek referenced:
```diff
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ void check_cpu_icache_size(int cpuid)
asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 1" : "=r" (ctr));
size = 1 << ((ctr & 0xf) + 2);
+ pr_warn("CPU%u: icache line size: %u, size %u\n", cpuid, icache_size, size);
if (cpuid != 0 && icache_size != size)
pr_info("CPU%u: detected I-Cache line size mismatch, workaround enabled\n",
cpuid);
```Then we get in dmesg:
CPU0: icache line size: 64, size 32
CPU1: icache line size: 32, size 32
CPU2: icache line size: 32, size 32
CPU3: icache line size: 32, size 32
CPU4: icache line size: 32, size 64
CPU5: icache line size: 32, size 64
CPU6: icache line size: 32, size 64
CPU7: icache line size: 32, size 64
I interpret this as that the i-cache-line-size property of CPU4, 5, 6 and 7 (i.e. cpu@0, cpu@1, cpu@2 and cpu@4) should be 64 instead of 32.
Not sure about the other properties..
Quoted 45 lines
Here's an article that provides detailed insights into the cache feature.
[0] http://jake.dothome.co.kr/cache4/The values associated with L1 and L2 caches indicate their respective sizes, as specified in the ARM Technical Reference Manual (TRM) below.
Cortex-A15 L2 cache controller
[0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a15-l2-cache-controllerCortex-A7 L2 cache controller
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a7-l2-cache-controllerThese changes help define a fixed cache size, ensuring that active pages are mapped correctly within the expected cache boundaries.
Here is the small test case using perf
Before$ sudo perf stat -e L1-dcache-loads,L1-dcache-load-misses ./factSimulated Cache Miss Time (avg): 4766632 ns
Factorial(10) = 3628800Performance counter stats for './fact':
926328 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-loads/ <not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-loads/ (0.00%) 16510 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-load-misses/ # 1.78% of all L1-dcache accesses <not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-load-misses/ (0.00%) 0.008970031 seconds time elapsed 0.000000000 seconds user 0.009673000 seconds sysAfter
$ sudo perf stat -e L1-dcache-loads,L1-dcache-load-misses ./fact Simulated Cache Miss Time (avg): 4623272 ns Factorial(10) = 3628800Performance counter stats for './fact':
Quoted 12 lines
930570 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-loads/
<not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-loads/
(0.00%)
4755 armv7_cortex_a15/L1-dcache-load-misses/ #
0.51% of all L1-dcache accesses
<not counted> armv7_cortex_a7/L1-dcache-load-misses/
(0.00%)
0.011068250 seconds time elapsed
0.000000000 seconds user
0.010793000 seconds sysI tried out the same test on my odroid-xu4, but was not able to reliably get the same improvement. Cache misses varied between around 0.8 % to around 2.8 %. This was with a desktop UI installed and though, will try it out in a headless installation in the next few days, and perhaps try it on exynos5800 as well.
Might be worth also testing on both small and big cores, like:
$ sudo taskset -c 0,1,2,3 perf stat -e L1-dcache-loads,L1-dcache-load-misses ./fact $ sudo taskset -c 4,5,6,7 perf stat -e L1-dcache-loads,L1-dcache-load-misses ./fact
Best regards,
Henrik Grimler
Krzysztof Kozlowski
maintainerRe: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
In reply to Anand MoonQuoted 81 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof, Marek,
Quoted 78 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 61 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 59 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per the Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Quoted 7 lines
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Ok, If I am not wrong
icache_sizeis hard-coded in the above commit.(quoted diff) +8
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND +.globl icache_size + .data + .align 2 +icache_size: + .long 64 + .text +#endifQuoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
In the
check_cpu_icache_sizefunction, we read the control reg and recalculate theicache_size.
if there mismatch we re-apply theIcache_size,So dts passed values do not apply over here,
So you provide incorrect values in terms of them being ignored? Then do not provide at all.
I will drop the icache and dcache values and just pass the
L2_a7andL2_a15, value
Is this ok for you?
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Earlier, I have tried to verify this information in /sys and /proc to verify the changes as ARM does not populate this information.
Here's an article that provides detailed insights into the cache feature.
[0] http://jake.dothome.co.kr/cache4/
Here is Korean Wikipedia article about Sugar glider:
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%9C%A0%EB%8C%80%ED%95%98%EB%8A%98%EB%8B%A4%EB%9E%8C%EC%A5%90
I guess we are putting now random references in Korean to our emails.
Quoted 4 lines
The values associated with L1 and L2 caches indicate their respective sizes, as specified in the ARM Technical Reference Manual (TRM) below.
Quoted 8 lines
Cortex-A15 L2 cache controller
[0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a15-l2-cache-controllerCortex-A7 L2 cache controller
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a7-l2-cache-controllerThese changes help define a fixed cache size, ensuring that active pages are mapped correctly within the expected cache boundaries.
As with many previous attempts, you do not understand comments and questions and you do not reply to them. This makes conversation pointless.
To prove it:
1. No one asks for performance numbers.
2. You give performance numbers.
I am dropping this patch because you did not address actual comments. I also do not plan to give thorough review to other of your patches, because you wasted a lot of my time in the past and this example here proves you keep wasting.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: samsung: Add cache information to the Exynos542x SoC
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 86 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 84 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof, Marek,
Quoted 81 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 61 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 59 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Krzysztof,
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 25 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Marek,
Quoted 22 lines · Marek Szyprowski
Quoted 17 lines · Anand Moon
As per the Exynos 5422 user manual add missing cache information to the Exynos542x SoC.
- Each Cortex-A7 core has 32 KB of instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- Each Cortex-A15 core has 32 KB of L1 instruction cache and 32 KB of L1 data cache available.
- The little (A7) cluster has 512 KB of unified L2 cache available.
- The big (A15) cluster has 2 MB of unified L2 cache available.Features:
- Exynos 5422 support cache coherency interconnect (CCI) bus with L2 cache snooping capability. This hardware automatic L2 cache snooping removes the efforts of synchronizing the contents of the two L2 caches in core switching event.Signed-off-by Anand Moon <[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The provided values are not correct. Please refer to commit
5f41f9198f29("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores"), which adds workaround for different l1 icache line size between big and little CPUs. This workaround gets enabled on all Exynos542x/5800 boards.Ok, I have just referred to the Exynos 5422 user manual for this patch, This patch is just updating the cache size for CPU for big.litle architecture..
Quoted 7 lines
Let me get it right. Marek's comment was that you used wrong values. Marek also provided rationale for this. Now your reply is that you update cache size? Sorry, I fail how you address Marek's comment.
Do not repeat what the patch is doing. We all can see it. Instead respond to the comment with some sort of arguments.
Ok, If I am not wrong
icache_sizeis hard-coded in the above commit.(quoted diff) +8
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND +.globl icache_size + .data + .align 2 +icache_size: + .long 64 + .text +#endifQuoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
In the
check_cpu_icache_sizefunction, we read the control reg and recalculate theicache_size.
if there mismatch we re-apply theIcache_size,So dts passed values do not apply over here,
So you provide incorrect values in terms of them being ignored? Then do not provide at all.
I will drop the icache and dcache values and just pass the
L2_a7andL2_a15, value
Is this ok for you?Earlier, I have tried to verify this information in /sys and /proc to verify the changes as ARM does not populate this information.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Here's an article that provides detailed insights into the cache feature.
[0] http://jake.dothome.co.kr/cache4/Here is Korean Wikipedia article about Sugar glider:
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%9C%A0%EB%8C%80%ED%95%98%EB%8A%98%EB%8B%A4%EB%9E%8C%EC%A5%90I guess we are putting now random references in Korean to our emails.
That wasn’t my intention—I was simply trying to elaborate on my thought process. If the reference came across as random or unclear,
I’ll make sure to be more precise going forward. Thanks for pointing it out.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 5 lines
The values associated with L1 and L2 caches indicate their respective sizes, as specified in the ARM Technical Reference Manual (TRM) below.
Quoted 8 lines
Cortex-A15 L2 cache controller
[0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a15-l2-cache-controllerCortex-A7 L2 cache controller
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0503/i/programmers-model/programmable-peripherals-and-interfaces/cortex-a7-l2-cache-controllerThese changes help define a fixed cache size, ensuring that active pages are mapped correctly within the expected cache boundaries.
Quoted 8 lines
As with many previous attempts, you do not understand comments and questions and you do not reply to them. This makes conversation pointless.
To prove it:
1. No one asks for performance numbers.
2. You give performance numbers.
I realize my explanation might have been confusing. What I meant is that my changes take a different approach, but they’re safe and don’t break the current codebase.
Specifically, they do not break or interfere with the behavior introduced in commit5f41f9198f29 ("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores").
Quoted 4 lines
I am dropping this patch because you did not address actual comments. I also do not plan to give thorough review to other of your patches, because you wasted a lot of my time in the past and this example here proves you keep wasting.
Thanks for the feedback. I understand your frustration,
and I regret that my response didn’t adequately address your comments. I intended to clarify my understanding and contribute constructively, not to waste anyone’s time.
I’ll take this as a cue to improve how I respond to reviews going forward. Appreciate the time you’ve spent engaging with my patches.
Quoted 3 lines
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Thanks
-Anand