Bluetooth: hci_event: Mask data status from LE ext adv reports
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 Bluetooth: hci_event: Mask data status from LE ext adv reports
The Event_Type field in an LE Extended Advertising Report uses bits 5 and 6 for data status (e.g. fragmentation), not the PDU type itself.
The ext_evt_type_to_legacy() function fails to mask these status bits before evaluation. This causes valid advertisements with status bits set (e.g. a fragmented non-connectable advertisement, which ends up showing as PDU type 0x40) to be misclassified as unknown and subsequently dropped. This is okay for most checks which use bitwise AND on the relevant event type bits, but it doesn't work for non-connectable types, which are checked with '== LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND' (that is, zero).
This patch introduces a PDU type mask to ensure only the relevant bits are evaluated, allowing for the correct translation of all valid extended advertising packets.
--- net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +12 -8
@@ -6237,10 +6237,14 @@ static void hci_le_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,hci_dev_unlock (hdev); } +#define LE_EXT_ADV_DATA_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(6, 5) +static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy (struct hci_dev *hdev,u16 evt_type) { -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_LEGACY_PDU ) { -switch (evt_type) { +u16 pdu_type = evt_type & ~LE_EXT_ADV_DATA_STATUS_MASK ; + +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_LEGACY_PDU ) { +switch (pdu_type) {case LE_LEGACY_ADV_IND :return LE_ADV_IND ;case LE_LEGACY_ADV_DIRECT_IND :
@@ -6257,21 +6261,21 @@ static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) goto invalid; } -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_CONN_IND ) { -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_CONN_IND ) { +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND )return LE_ADV_DIRECT_IND ;return LE_ADV_IND ; } -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_RSP ) +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_RSP )return LE_ADV_SCAN_RSP ; -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_IND ) +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_IND )return LE_ADV_SCAN_IND ; -if (evt_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || - evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) +if (pdu_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || + pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND )return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND ; invalid:
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=983051
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.27 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.19 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds BuildKernel PASS 24.17 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 26.64 seconds CheckSparse WARNING 30.08 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 23.90 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 471.53 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 25.45 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 40.15 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.20 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 132.04 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.54 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 14.95 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.34 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 11.75 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.82 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.44 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.78 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: CheckSparse - WARNING
Desc: Run sparse tool with linux kernel
Output:net/bluetooth/hci_event.c: note: in included file (through include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h):
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 490, Passed: 484 (98.8%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
LL Privacy - Add Device 3 (AL is full) Failed 0.216 seconds LL Privacy - Start Discovery 2 (Disable RL) Failed 0.198 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.276 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 2.000 seconds
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output:
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerHi Chris,
Quoted 11 lines · Chris Down
The
Event_Typefield in an LE Extended Advertising Report uses bits 5 and 6 for data status (e.g. fragmentation), not the PDU type itself.The
ext_evt_type_to_legacy()function fails to mask these status bits before evaluation. This causes valid advertisements with status bits set (e.g. a fragmented non-connectable advertisement, which ends up showing as PDU type0x40) to be misclassified as unknown and subsequently dropped. This is okay for most checks which use bitwise AND on the relevant event type bits, but it doesn't work for non-connectable types, which are checked with '==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND' (that is, zero).
Can you include a sample trace of the above? Also it would be great to have a mgmt-tester for example that attempts to generate an advertisement like that to exercise such change.
Quoted 47 lines
This patch introduces a PDU type mask to ensure only the relevant bits are evaluated, allowing for the correct translation of all valid extended advertising packets.
Signed-off-by Chris Down <[email protected]>--- net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +7
-5@@ -6237,10 +6237,14 @@ static void hci_le_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,hci_dev_unlock (hdev); } +#define LE_EXT_ADV_DATA_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(6, 5)static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy (struct hci_dev *hdev,u16 evt_type) { -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_LEGACY_PDU ) { -switch (evt_type) { +u16 pdu_type = evt_type & ~LE_EXT_ADV_DATA_STATUS_MASK ; + +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_LEGACY_PDU ) { +switch (pdu_type) {case LE_LEGACY_ADV_IND :return LE_ADV_IND ;case LE_LEGACY_ADV_DIRECT_IND :@@ -6257,21 +6261,21 @@ static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) goto invalid; } -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_CONN_IND ) { -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_CONN_IND ) { +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND )return LE_ADV_DIRECT_IND ;return LE_ADV_IND ; } -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_RSP )
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) · line 6277
Quoted 10 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +3
-3+if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_RSP )return LE_ADV_SCAN_RSP ; -if (evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_IND ) +if (pdu_type &LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_IND )return LE_ADV_SCAN_IND ; -if (evt_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || - evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) + if (pdu_type == LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND ||
I'm not sure I would keep checking for LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND, maybe just return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND, LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND is not actually a bit it is the absence of any bits being set, so I guess the only invalid adv are the ones for legacy which seem to require a bit to be set.
Quoted 8 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +1
-1+ pdu_type & LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND)return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND ; invalid: --2.49.0
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
Thanks for the review!
Quoted 1 line · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Can you include a sample trace of the above?
Is that with btmon or similar? Sorry, I'm not a regular contributor to this subsystem :-)
I mostly have a personal desire to get this merged because it's a particularly noisy case where I happen to live :-) These are all with 0x40:
% dmesg | wc -l
3815
% dmesg | grep -c 'Unknown advertising'
3227
Quoted 1 line
Also it would be great to have a mgmt-tester for example that attempts to generate an advertisement like that to exercise such change.
Looks like that's in Bluez userspace code right, so what's the order of doing these things?
Quoted 9 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) · line 6277
Quoted 3 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +1
-2-if (evt_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || - evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) + if (pdu_type == LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND ||I'm not sure I would keep checking for
LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND, maybe just returnLE_ADV_NONCONN_IND,LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_INDis not actually a bit it is the absence of any bits being set, so I guess the only invalid adv are the ones for legacy which seem to require a bit to be set.
So are you thinking of doing this?
if (!(pdu_type & ~(LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND)))
return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
Thanks for your help!
Chris
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerHi Chris,
Quoted 11 lines · Chris Down
Hi Luiz,
Thanks for the review!
Quoted 1 line · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Can you include a sample trace of the above?
Is that with btmon or similar? Sorry, I'm not a regular contributor to this subsystem :-)
Quoted 7 lines
I mostly have a personal desire to get this merged because it's a particularly noisy case where I happen to live :-) These are all with
0x40:% dmesg | wc -l
3815
% dmesg | grep -c 'Unknown advertising'
3227
Try to capture one of them using btmon and then add to the patch description.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Also it would be great to have a mgmt-tester for example that attempts to generate an advertisement like that to exercise such change.
Looks like that's in Bluez userspace code right, so what's the order of doing these things?
Quoted 9 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) · line 6277
Quoted 3 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +1
-2-if (evt_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || - evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) + if (pdu_type == LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND ||I'm not sure I would keep checking for
LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND, maybe just returnLE_ADV_NONCONN_IND,LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_INDis not actually a bit it is the absence of any bits being set, so I guess the only invalid adv are the ones for legacy which seem to require a bit to be set.
Quoted 4 lines
So are you thinking of doing this?
if (!(pdu_type & ~(LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND))) return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
We can probably return early on if (!evt_type) return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND since there is no point in evaluating it if it is zero.
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks for your help!
Chris
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 1 line
Try to capture one of them using btmon and then add to the patch description.
Thanks, I have one now and will add for v2.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) · line 6277
Quoted 3 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +1
-2-if (evt_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || - evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) + if (pdu_type == LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND ||I'm not sure I would keep checking for
LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND, maybe just returnLE_ADV_NONCONN_IND,LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_INDis not actually a bit it is the absence of any bits being set, so I guess the only invalid adv are the ones for legacy which seem to require a bit to be set.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
So are you thinking of doing this?
if (!(pdu_type & ~(LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND))) return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;We can probably return early on if (!evt_type) return
LE_ADV_NONCONN_INDsince there is no point in evaluating it if it is zero.
I guess you meant if (!pdu_type)? That correctly handles the 0x40 case (where pdu_type becomes 0), but it would miss non-connectable directed advertisements (PDU type 0x04), right? Or maybe you meant something else?
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerHi Chris,
Quoted 22 lines · Chris Down
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 1 line
Try to capture one of them using btmon and then add to the patch description.
Thanks, I have one now and will add for v2.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 9 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c static u8 ext_evt_type_to_legacy(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 evt_type) · line 6277
Quoted 3 lines
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c +1
-2-if (evt_type ==LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND || - evt_type &LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND ) + if (pdu_type == LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND ||I'm not sure I would keep checking for
LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND, maybe just returnLE_ADV_NONCONN_IND,LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_INDis not actually a bit it is the absence of any bits being set, so I guess the only invalid adv are the ones for legacy which seem to require a bit to be set.So are you thinking of doing this?
if (!(pdu_type & ~(LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND))) return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
We can probably return early on if (!evt_type) return
LE_ADV_NONCONN_INDsince there is no point in evaluating it if it is zero.I guess you meant
if (!pdu_type)? That correctly handles the0x40case (wherepdu_typebecomes 0), but it would miss non-connectable directed advertisements (PDU type0x04), right? Or maybe you meant something else?
Yes, we can just test for !pdu_type and return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND skipping any testing of bits.
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz