linux-next: build failure after merge of the fs-next tree
Subsystems (2)
Mark Brown
maintainerHi all,
After merging the fs-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c: In function 'exfat_file_mmap_prepare':/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c:842:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
842 | if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vma_desc_set_flagsCaused by commit
9b373eacd6e6c4 (exfat: add iomap buffered I/O support)
from the exfat tree interacting with
2c3b5ea7028fa (mm: reintroduce vma_desc_test() as a singular flag test)
from one of the mm trees. I have applied a fixup which I can carry as needed.
From c4935dbc4b15a9119616ac73b17eff29a7e2ec87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:08:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] exfat: Fix up merge with mm
/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c: In function 'exfat_file_mmap_prepare':/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c:842:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
842 | if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vma_desc_set_flags--- fs/exfat/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/exfat/file.c +1 -1
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int exfat_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)if (unlikely (exfat_forced_shutdown (file_inode (desc->file)->i_sb)))return -EIO ; -if (vma_desc_test_flags (desc,VMA_WRITE_BIT )) { +if (vma_desc_test (desc,VMA_WRITE_BIT )) {struct inode *inode =file_inode (file);loff_t from, to;int err;
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
Quoted 45 lines · Mark Brown
Hi all,
After merging the fs-next tree, today's linux-next build (
x86_64allmodconfig) failed like this:
/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c: In function 'exfat_file_mmap_prepare':/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c:842:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]842 | if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vma_desc_set_flagsCaused by commit
9b373eacd6e6c4(exfat: add iomap buffered I/O support)from the exfat tree interacting with
2c3b5ea7028fa(mm: reintroducevma_desc_test()as a singular flag test)from one of the mm trees. I have applied a fixup which I can carry as needed.
From
c4935dbc4b15a9119616ac73b17eff29a7e2ec87Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:08:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] exfat: Fix up merge with mm
/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c: In function 'exfat_file_mmap_prepare':/tmp/next/build/fs/exfat/file.c:842:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_desc_test_flags'; did you mean 'vma_desc_set_flags'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]842 | if (vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vma_desc_set_flagsSigned-off-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>--- fs/exfat/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/exfat/file.c +0
-0
fs/exfat/file.c static int exfat_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc) · line 842
Quoted 5 lines
fs/exfat/file.c +1
-1@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int exfat_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)if (unlikely (exfat_forced_shutdown (file_inode (desc->file)->i_sb)))return -EIO ; -if (vma_desc_test_flags (desc,VMA_WRITE_BIT )) { +if (vma_desc_test (desc,VMA_WRITE_BIT )) {
LGTM, Cheers!
Quoted 6 lines
fs/exfat/file.c +0
-1struct inode *inode =file_inode (file);loff_t from, to;int err; --2.47.3
Namjae Jeon
maintainerfs/exfat/file.c static int exfat_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc) · line 845
Quoted 13 lines
fs/exfat/file.c +1
-1@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int exfat_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)if (unlikely (exfat_forced_shutdown (file_inode (desc->file)->i_sb)))return -EIO ; -if (vma_desc_test_flags (desc,VMA_WRITE_BIT )) { +if (vma_desc_test (desc,VMA_WRITE_BIT )) {struct inode *inode =file_inode (file);loff_t from, to;int err;
Looks good to me:)
Thank you, Mark!
Quoted 3 lines
--
2.47.3