IPoIB: synchronize timer deletion with completion handler
PATCH 1/1 IPoIB: synchronize timer deletion with completion handler
When calling del_timer_sync on priv->poll_timer, it is necessary to prevent farther arming of the timer which can be done by a completion handler. Though it is harmless since the timer will eventually stop being rearmed, it is better practice to avoid calling the timer function after it is deleted. This patch handles this by using a new flag that is checked before arming the timer.
--- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h | 1 + drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h +1 -0
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum {IPOIB_FLAG_ADMIN_CM =9 ,IPOIB_FLAG_UMCAST =10 ,IPOIB_FLAG_CSUM =11 , +IPOIB_FLAG_POLL_TIMER =12 , IPOIB_MAX_BACKOFF_SECONDS = 16,
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c +4 -1
@@ -481,7 +481,8 @@ void ipoib_send_comp_handler(struct ib_cq *cq, void *dev_ptr) {struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv =netdev_priv (dev_ptr); -mod_timer (&priv->poll_timer, jiffies); +if (test_bit (IPOIB_FLAG_POLL_TIMER , &priv->flags)) +mod_timer (&priv->poll_timer, jiffies); } static inline int post_send(struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv,
@@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ int ipoib_ib_dev_stop(struct net_device *dev, int flush)ipoib_dbg (priv,"All sends and receives done.\n" ); timeout: +clear_bit (IPOIB_FLAG_POLL_TIMER , &priv->flags);del_timer_sync (&priv->poll_timer); qp_attr.qp_state =IB_QPS_RESET ;if (ib_modify_qp (priv->qp, &qp_attr,IB_QP_STATE ))
@@ -904,6 +906,7 @@ int ipoib_ib_dev_init(struct net_device *dev, struct ib_device *ca, int port)setup_timer (&priv->poll_timer, ipoib_ib_tx_timer_func, (unsigned long ) dev); +set_bit (IPOIB_FLAG_POLL_TIMER , &priv->flags);if (dev->flags &IFF_UP ) {if (ipoib_ib_dev_open (dev)) {
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.5
Quoted 6 lines
When calling
del_timer_synconpriv->poll_timer, it is necessary to prevent farther arming of the timer which can be done by a completion handler. Though it is harmless since the timer will eventually stop being rearmed, it is better practice to avoid calling the timer function after it is deleted. This patch handles this by using a new flag that is checked before arming the timer.
have you seen this in practice? If it can happen then it's not harmless, since the module could be unloaded with the timer pending. However I don't see how it could happen, since we only seem to delete the timer after we know that no more completions are coming (except for the case where we decide that the hardware is wedged but it really only takes a *long* time to respond at exactly the wrong time, and we somehow get a completion between the del_timer_sync and the modify QP to reset state -- which is so unlikely it seems not worth adding this extra complexity for -- maybe we could add the del_timer_sync to after we delete the CQ or something if you're really worried)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): adapr6npya2.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org
Quoted 7 lines · Roland Dreier
Quoted 6 lines
When calling
del_timer_synconpriv->poll_timer, it is necessary to prevent farther arming of the timer which can be done by a completion handler. Though it is harmless since the timer will eventually stop being rearmed, it is better practice to avoid calling the timer function after it is deleted. This patch handles this by using a new flag that is checked before arming the timer.
Quoted 10 lines
have you seen this in practice? If it can happen then it's not harmless, since the module could be unloaded with the timer pending. However I don't see how it could happen, since we only seem to delete the timer after we know that no more completions are coming (except for the case where we decide that the hardware is wedged but it really only takes a *long* time to respond at exactly the wrong time, and we somehow get a completion between the
del_timer_syncand the modify QP to reset state -- which is so unlikely it seems not worth adding this extra complexity for -- maybe we could add thedel_timer_syncto after we delete the CQ or something if you're really worried)
No, I haven't actually seen this happening but I think it could. Consider this scenario:
1. ipoib_send() calls ib_req_notify_cq()
2. ipoib_ib_dev_stop() gets called
3. All pending WR complete; interrupt is generated but not yet serviced.
4. ipoib_ib_dev_stop() calls del_timer_sync() and passes it.
5. Completion handler is finally serviced - it schedules ipoib_ib_tx_timer_func()
6. IPoIB unloads and we're in trouble.
Not so likely to happen indeed. Your suggestion to defer deleting the timer until after the CQ is destroyed will also solve this.