fprintf stderr in libibverbs
Hi Roland,
I'd like to prepare a patch to do something with the fprintfs in libibverbs src/init.c - but I'm not sure what you'd accept.
My main goal would be to remove prints from the library in common cases like no IB drivers loaded, no devices present, or no permissions. I have an app where the prints are inconvient.
What I was thinking was to return these cases via errno (ENOSYS, ENODEV, EPERM) in ibv_get_device_list. Do you think that is OK?
Further, it would be nice to make the other prints work in some kind of more general fashion so that the messages could be shown for GUI apps, or what have you. The only thing I could think of was something like:
int ibv_get_device_list_ex(struct ibv_device ***devices,int *num_devices,
const char **warning_msg);
Used as:
struct ibv_device **dev
int num_devices;
char *msg;
if ((rc = ibv_get_device_list_ex(&dev, &num, &msg))) {
errno = rc;
perror("Failed to get IB devices: '%s'",msg); free(msg);
}fputs(stderr,msg);
free(msg);
What do you think? Preference?
Thanks,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20091028054232.GA1966-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
Quoted 7 lines
My main goal would be to remove prints from the library in common cases like no IB drivers loaded, no devices present, or no permissions. I have an app where the prints are inconvient.
What I was thinking was to return these cases via errno (ENOSYS, ENODEV, EPERM) in
ibv_get_device_list. Do you think that is OK?
Yes, that makes sense I guess.
Quoted 2 lines
int ibv_get_device_list_ex(struct
ibv_device***devices,int*num_devices,const char **warning_msg);
Are there that many cases where the output is important enough and likely enough that it's worth a new API to get it out when stderr doesn't suffice?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 9 lines · Roland Dreier
Quoted 7 lines
My main goal would be to remove prints from the library in common cases like no IB drivers loaded, no devices present, or no permissions. I have an app where the prints are inconvient.
What I was thinking was to return these cases via errno (ENOSYS, ENODEV, EPERM) in
ibv_get_device_list. Do you think that is OK?Yes, that makes sense I guess.
OK, I will see how that looks.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
int ibv_get_device_list_ex(struct
ibv_device***devices,int*num_devices,const char **warning_msg);Are there that many cases where the output is important enough and likely enough that it's worth a new API to get it out when stderr doesn't suffice?
Looks like just one..
I think we can assume that the sysfs accesses won't fail in real cases, so those fprintfs are 'uncommon'..
All the ENOMEM cases are also 'uncommon' and could perhaps be fixed up to return errno (probably not worth the effort)
That leaves these ones:
dlhandle = dlopen(so_name, RTLD_NOW);
if (!dlhandle) {
fprintf(stderr, PFX "Warning: couldn't load driver '%s': %s\n",
name, dlerror());
fprintf(stderr, PFX "Warning: ignoring bad config directive "
"'%s' in file '%s'.\n", field, path);
fprintf(stderr, PFX "Warning: couldn't open config directory '%s'.\n",
IBV_CONFIG_DIR);
fprintf(stderr, PFX "Warning: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is %lu bytes.\n"
" This will severely limit memory registrations.\n",
rlim.rlim_cur);
fprintf(stderr, PFX "Warning: fork()-safety requested "
"but init failed\n");
fprintf(stderr, PFX "Warning: no userspace device-specific "
"driver found for %s\n", sysfs_dev->sysfs_path);Basically, the only one that tends to occur in common cases is RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. The rest are environment configuration problems. (Though I was working with someone with an embedded mthca and add in mlx4 that was puzzled they had to compile libmthca just to silence those messages..)
Maybe RLIMIT would be better handled by having apps check errno on ibv_reg_mr failure and report ENOMEM?
Looks to me like the current code already does, so that is just a doc update..
Actually, that is something else I was wondering about - the few functions that return pointers have no documented error code at all, looks like many (all?) do set errno anyhow - is that a doc oversight or by design or ??? It would be nice to have err codes come out for those functions that can fail.
Thanks,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html