Cleanup for staging lustre obdclass
cover Cleanup for staging lustre obdclass
Fixes of issues found with checkpatch.pl for the lustre obdclass driver.
Dafna Hirschfeld (3):
staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
staging: lustre: obdclass: Add 'const' to char* array
staging: lustre: obdclass: Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 12 ++++++------ 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH 1/3 staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
Replace comparison to NULL with 'not' operator.
Move constants to the right side of a comparison.
Issues found with checkpatch.pl
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +3 -3
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid (enum cl_io_type type) { -return CIT_READ <= type && type <CIT_OP_NR ; +return type >=CIT_READ && type <CIT_OP_NR ; }static inline int cl_io_is_loopable (const struct cl_io *io)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)*/ int cl_io_is_going (const struct lu_env *env) { -return cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io !=NULL ; +return !!cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io; }/**
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io)const struct cl_io_slice *scan;LASSERT (cl_io_is_loopable (io)); -LASSERT (CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED ); +LASSERT (io->ci_state >=CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED );LINVRNT (cl_io_invariant (io)); set = &io->ci_lockset;
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1 -1
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ const char *cl_lock_mode_name(const enum cl_lock_mode mode) [CLM_WRITE] = "W", [CLM_GROUP] = "G" }; -if (0 <= mode && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names)) +if (mode >=0 && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names))return names[mode];else return "U" ;
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c +2 -2
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_add(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_sub(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1 -1
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ int ldebugfs_seq_create(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,struct dentry *entry;/* Disallow secretly (un)writable entries. */ -LASSERT ((seq_fops->write ==NULL ) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); +LASSERT ((!seq_fops->write) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); entry =debugfs_create_file (name, mode, parent, data, seq_fops);if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (entry))
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +2 -2
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static void key_fini(struct lu_context *ctx, int index)void lu_context_key_degister (struct lu_context_key *key) {LASSERT (atomic_read (&key->lct_used) >=1 ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));lu_context_key_quiesce (key);
@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ void *lu_context_key_get(const struct lu_context *ctx, const struct lu_context_key *key) {LINVRNT (ctx->lc_state ==LCS_ENTERED ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));LASSERT (lu_keys[key->lct_index] == key);return ctx->lc_value[key->lct_index]; }
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
Quoted 2 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace comparison to NULL with 'not' operator.
Move constants to the right side of a comparison.
Personally, I prefer lower_bound <= x && x < upper_bound. I think the designer of checkpatch prefers x >= lower_bound && x < lower_bound. Maybe the Lustre people have a preference.
Quoted 25 lines
Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid (enum cl_io_type type) { -return CIT_READ <= type && type <CIT_OP_NR ; +return type >=CIT_READ && type <CIT_OP_NR ; }static inline int cl_io_is_loopable (const struct cl_io *io)
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io) · line 75
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)*/ int cl_io_is_going (const struct lu_env *env) { -return cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io !=NULL ; +return !!cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io;
It looks like the return type should be bool.
This one is sort of different from the others, and should probably be in a different patch.
julia
Quoted 92 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1}/** @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io)const struct cl_io_slice *scan;LASSERT (cl_io_is_loopable (io)); -LASSERT (CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED ); +LASSERT (io->ci_state >=CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED );LINVRNT (cl_io_invariant (io)); set = &io->ci_lockset;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1
-1@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ const char *cl_lock_mode_name(const enum cl_lock_mode mode) [CLM_WRITE] = "W", [CLM_GROUP] = "G" }; -if (0 <= mode && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names)) +if (mode >=0 && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names))return names[mode];else return "U" ;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c +2
-2@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_add(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_sub(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1
-1@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ int ldebugfs_seq_create(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,struct dentry *entry;/* Disallow secretly (un)writable entries. */ -LASSERT ((seq_fops->write ==NULL ) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); +LASSERT ((!seq_fops->write) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); entry =debugfs_create_file (name, mode, parent, data, seq_fops);if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (entry))drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +2
-3@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static void key_fini(struct lu_context *ctx, int index)void lu_context_key_degister (struct lu_context_key *key) {LASSERT (atomic_read (&key->lct_used) >=1 ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));lu_context_key_quiesce (key);@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ void *lu_context_key_get(const struct lu_context *ctx, const struct lu_context_key *key) {LINVRNT (ctx->lc_state ==LCS_ENTERED ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));LASSERT (lu_keys[key->lct_index] == key);return ctx->lc_value[key->lct_index]; } --2.7.4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/d54195335419311b40f159ee1d5c89a625937899.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
Quoted 44 lines · Julia Lawall
Quoted 2 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace comparison to NULL with 'not' operator.
Move constants to the right side of a comparison.Personally, I prefer
lower_bound<= x && x <upper_bound. I think the designer of checkpatch prefers x >=lower_bound&& x <lower_bound. Maybe the Lustre people have a preference.Quoted 25 lines
Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid (enum cl_io_type type) { -return CIT_READ <= type && type <CIT_OP_NR ; +return type >=CIT_READ && type <CIT_OP_NR ; }static inline int cl_io_is_loopable (const struct cl_io *io)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io) · line 75
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)*/ int cl_io_is_going (const struct lu_env *env) { -return cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io !=NULL ; +return !!cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io;It looks like the return type should be bool.
Quoted 5 lines
This one is sort of different from the others, and should probably be in a different patch.
julia
Ok, but it still bool since it is double exclamation marks.
Quoted 92 lines
Quoted 92 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1}/** @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io)const struct cl_io_slice *scan;LASSERT (cl_io_is_loopable (io)); -LASSERT (CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED ); +LASSERT (io->ci_state >=CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED );LINVRNT (cl_io_invariant (io)); set = &io->ci_lockset;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1
-1@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ const char *cl_lock_mode_name(const enum cl_lock_mode mode) [CLM_WRITE] = "W", [CLM_GROUP] = "G" }; -if (0 <= mode && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names)) +if (mode >=0 && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names))return names[mode];else return "U" ;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c +2
-2@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_add(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_sub(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1
-1@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ int ldebugfs_seq_create(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,struct dentry *entry;/* Disallow secretly (un)writable entries. */ -LASSERT ((seq_fops->write ==NULL ) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); +LASSERT ((!seq_fops->write) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); entry =debugfs_create_file (name, mode, parent, data, seq_fops);if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (entry))drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +2
-3@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static void key_fini(struct lu_context *ctx, int index)void lu_context_key_degister (struct lu_context_key *key) {LASSERT (atomic_read (&key->lct_used) >=1 ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));lu_context_key_quiesce (key);@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ void *lu_context_key_get(const struct lu_context *ctx, const struct lu_context_key *key) {LINVRNT (ctx->lc_state ==LCS_ENTERED ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));LASSERT (lu_keys[key->lct_index] == key);return ctx->lc_value[key->lct_index]; } --2.7.4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/d54195335419311b40f159ee1d5c89a625937899.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
Quoted 45 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Quoted 44 lines · Julia Lawall
Quoted 2 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace comparison to NULL with 'not' operator.
Move constants to the right side of a comparison.Personally, I prefer
lower_bound<= x && x <upper_bound. I think the designer of checkpatch prefers x >=lower_bound&& x <lower_bound. Maybe the Lustre people have a preference.Quoted 25 lines
Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid (enum cl_io_type type) { -return CIT_READ <= type && type <CIT_OP_NR ; +return type >=CIT_READ && type <CIT_OP_NR ; }static inline int cl_io_is_loopable (const struct cl_io *io)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io) · line 75
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)*/ int cl_io_is_going (const struct lu_env *env) { -return cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io !=NULL ; +return !!cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io;It looks like the return type should be bool.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
This one is sort of different from the others, and should probably be in a different patch.
julia
Ok, but it still bool since it is double exclamation marks.
Sorry, I don't get the point. The return type is declared as int.
julia
Quoted 101 lines
Quoted 86 lines
Quoted 86 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1}/** @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io)const struct cl_io_slice *scan;LASSERT (cl_io_is_loopable (io)); -LASSERT (CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED ); +LASSERT (io->ci_state >=CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED );LINVRNT (cl_io_invariant (io)); set = &io->ci_lockset;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1
-1@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ const char *cl_lock_mode_name(const enum cl_lock_mode mode) [CLM_WRITE] = "W", [CLM_GROUP] = "G" }; -if (0 <= mode && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names)) +if (mode >=0 && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names))return names[mode];else return "U" ;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c +2
-2@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_add(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_sub(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1
-1@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ int ldebugfs_seq_create(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,struct dentry *entry;/* Disallow secretly (un)writable entries. */ -LASSERT ((seq_fops->write ==NULL ) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); +LASSERT ((!seq_fops->write) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); entry =debugfs_create_file (name, mode, parent, data, seq_fops);if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (entry))drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +2
-3@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static void key_fini(struct lu_context *ctx, int index)void lu_context_key_degister (struct lu_context_key *key) {LASSERT (atomic_read (&key->lct_used) >=1 ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));lu_context_key_quiesce (key);@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ void *lu_context_key_get(const struct lu_context *ctx, const struct lu_context_key *key) {LINVRNT (ctx->lc_state ==LCS_ENTERED ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));LASSERT (lu_keys[key->lct_index] == key);return ctx->lc_value[key->lct_index]; } --2.7.4
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/d54195335419311b40f159ee1d5c89a625937899.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/CAJ1myNR9_bau2kzqyXA2P9hB-pdMjkLHj5Qx2on-Ru8uyRZwNA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
Quoted 52 lines · Julia Lawall
Quoted 48 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Quoted 47 lines · Julia Lawall
Quoted 2 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace comparison to NULL with 'not' operator.
Move constants to the right side of a comparison.Personally, I prefer
lower_bound<= x && x <upper_bound. I think the designer of checkpatch prefers x >=lower_bound&& x <lower_bound. Maybe the Lustre people have a preference.Quoted 25 lines
Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid (enum cl_io_type type) { -return CIT_READ <= type && type <CIT_OP_NR ; +return type >=CIT_READ && type <CIT_OP_NR ; }static inline int cl_io_is_loopable (const struct cl_io *io)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io) · line 75
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)*/ int cl_io_is_going (const struct lu_env *env) { -return cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io !=NULL ; +return !!cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io;It looks like the return type should be bool.
This one is sort of different from the others, and should probably be in a different patch.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
julia
Ok, but it still bool since it is double exclamation marks.
Sorry, I don't get the point. The return type is declared as int.
julia
I meant that the actual return type was a bool and is still a bool. There are many functions in other parts of the kernel code that return bool but in the function declaration it declared to return int.
Quoted 102 lines
Quoted 102 lines
Quoted 87 lines
Quoted 87 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1}/** @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io)const struct cl_io_slice *scan;LASSERT (cl_io_is_loopable (io)); -LASSERT (CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED ); +LASSERT (io->ci_state >=CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED );LINVRNT (cl_io_invariant (io)); set = &io->ci_lockset;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1
-1@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ const char *cl_lock_mode_name(const enum cl_lock_mode mode) [CLM_WRITE] = "W", [CLM_GROUP] = "G" }; -if (0 <= mode && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names)) +if (mode >=0 && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names))return names[mode];else return "U" ;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c +2
-2@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_add(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_sub(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1
-1@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ int ldebugfs_seq_create(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,struct dentry *entry;/* Disallow secretly (un)writable entries. */ -LASSERT ((seq_fops->write ==NULL ) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); +LASSERT ((!seq_fops->write) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); entry =debugfs_create_file (name, mode, parent, data, seq_fops);if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (entry))drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +2
-3@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static void key_fini(struct lu_context *ctx, int index)void lu_context_key_degister (struct lu_context_key *key) {LASSERT (atomic_read (&key->lct_used) >=1 ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));lu_context_key_quiesce (key);@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ void *lu_context_key_get(const struct lu_context *ctx, const struct lu_context_key *key) {LINVRNT (ctx->lc_state ==LCS_ENTERED ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));LASSERT (lu_keys[key->lct_index] == key);return ctx->lc_value[key->lct_index]; } --2.7.4
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/d54195335419311b40f159ee1d5c89a625937899.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/CAJ1myNR9_bau2kzqyXA2P9hB-pdMjkLHj5Qx2on-Ru8uyRZwNA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Fix Comparison issues.
Quoted 57 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Quoted 56 lines · Julia Lawall
Quoted 51 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Quoted 44 lines · Julia Lawall
Quoted 2 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace comparison to NULL with 'not' operator.
Move constants to the right side of a comparison.Personally, I prefer
lower_bound<= x && x <upper_bound. I think the designer of checkpatch prefers x >=lower_bound&& x <lower_bound. Maybe the Lustre people have a preference.Quoted 25 lines
Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid (enum cl_io_type type) { -return CIT_READ <= type && type <CIT_OP_NR ; +return type >=CIT_READ && type <CIT_OP_NR ; }static inline int cl_io_is_loopable (const struct cl_io *io)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io) · line 75
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)*/ int cl_io_is_going (const struct lu_env *env) { -return cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io !=NULL ; +return !!cl_env_info (env)->clt_current_io;It looks like the return type should be bool.
Quoted 5 lines
This one is sort of different from the others, and should probably be in a different patch.
julia
Ok, but it still bool since it is double exclamation marks.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Sorry, I don't get the point. The return type is declared as int.
julia
I meant that the actual return type was a bool and is still a bool. There are many functions in other parts of the kernel code that return bool but in the function declaration it declared to return int.
There are also many functions that have a bool return type. It makes more apparent what is going on.
julia
Quoted 104 lines
Quoted 103 lines
Quoted 103 lines
Quoted 88 lines
Quoted 88 lines
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c +1
-1}/** @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io)const struct cl_io_slice *scan;LASSERT (cl_io_is_loopable (io)); -LASSERT (CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED ); +LASSERT (io->ci_state >=CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state <CIS_UNLOCKED );LINVRNT (cl_io_invariant (io)); set = &io->ci_lockset;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1
-1@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ const char *cl_lock_mode_name(const enum cl_lock_mode mode) [CLM_WRITE] = "W", [CLM_GROUP] = "G" }; -if (0 <= mode && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names)) +if (mode >=0 && mode <ARRAY_SIZE (names))return names[mode];else return "U" ;drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_counters.c +2
-2@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_add(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void lprocfs_counter_sub(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int idx, long amount)if (!stats)return ; -LASSERTF (0 <= idx && idx < stats->ls_num, +LASSERTF (idx >=0 && idx < stats->ls_num,"idx %d, ls_num %hu\n" , idx, stats->ls_num);/* With per-client stats, statistics are allocated only for drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1
-1@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ int ldebugfs_seq_create(struct dentry *parent, const char *name,struct dentry *entry;/* Disallow secretly (un)writable entries. */ -LASSERT ((seq_fops->write ==NULL ) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); +LASSERT ((!seq_fops->write) == ((mode &0222 ) ==0 )); entry =debugfs_create_file (name, mode, parent, data, seq_fops);if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (entry))drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +2
-3@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static void key_fini(struct lu_context *ctx, int index)void lu_context_key_degister (struct lu_context_key *key) {LASSERT (atomic_read (&key->lct_used) >=1 ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));lu_context_key_quiesce (key);@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ void *lu_context_key_get(const struct lu_context *ctx, const struct lu_context_key *key) {LINVRNT (ctx->lc_state ==LCS_ENTERED ); -LINVRNT (0 <= key->lct_index && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys)); +LINVRNT (key->lct_index >=0 && key->lct_index <ARRAY_SIZE (lu_keys));LASSERT (lu_keys[key->lct_index] == key);return ctx->lc_value[key->lct_index]; } --2.7.4
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/d54195335419311b40f159ee1d5c89a625937899.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/CAJ1myNR9_bau2kzqyXA2P9hB-pdMjkLHj5Qx2on-Ru8uyRZwNA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
PATCH 2/3 staging: lustre: obdclass: Add 'const' to char* array
In reply to Dafna HirschfeldReplace 'const char*' arrays with 'const char * const' since the values in the arrays are not changed. Issues found with checkpatch.pl
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1 -1
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cl_lock_release);const char *cl_lock_mode_name (const enum cl_lock_mode mode) { -static const char *names[] = { +static const char *const names[] = { [CLM_READ ] ="R" , [CLM_WRITE ] ="W" , [CLM_GROUP ] ="G"
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c +1 -1
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static struct cache_stats cl_env_stats = {int cl_site_stats_print (const struct cl_site *site,struct seq_file *m) {size_t i; -static const char *pstate[] = { +static const char *const pstate[] = { [CPS_CACHED ] ="c" , [CPS_OWNED ] ="o" , [CPS_PAGEOUT ] ="w" ,
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 2/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add 'const' to char* array
Quoted 5 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace 'const char*' arrays with 'const char * const' since the values in the arrays are not changed. Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>
Quoted 41 lines
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c +1
-1@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cl_lock_release);const char *cl_lock_mode_name (const enum cl_lock_mode mode) { -static const char *names[] = { +static const char *const names[] = { [CLM_READ ] ="R" , [CLM_WRITE ] ="W" , [CLM_GROUP ] ="G" drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c +1
-2@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static struct cache_stats cl_env_stats = {int cl_site_stats_print (const struct cl_site *site,struct seq_file *m) {size_t i; - static const char *pstate[] = { +static const char *const pstate[] = { [CPS_CACHED ] ="c" , [CPS_OWNED ] ="o" , [CPS_PAGEOUT ] ="w" , --2.7.4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/dc905c3f60a58a91ccd636cf5d4d9ed0ea334595.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
PATCH 3/3 staging: lustre: obdclass: Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'
In reply to Dafna HirschfeldReplace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' to improve readability. Issues found with checkpatch.pl
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1 -1
@@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ int lprocfs_write_frac_u64_helper(const char __user *buffer, {char kernbuf[22 ], *end, *pbuf;__u64 whole, frac =0 , units; -unsigned frac_d =1 ; +unsigned int frac_d =1 ;int sign =1 ;if (count > (sizeof (kernbuf) -1 ))
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +4 -4
@@ -1797,10 +1797,10 @@ int lu_env_refill(struct lu_env *env)EXPORT_SYMBOL (lu_env_refill);struct lu_site_stats { -unsigned lss_populated; -unsigned lss_max_search; -unsigned lss_total; -unsigned lss_busy; +unsigned int lss_populated; +unsigned int lss_max_search; +unsigned int lss_total; +unsigned int lss_busy; }; static void lu_site_stats_get(struct cfs_hash *hs,
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 3/3] staging: lustre: obdclass: Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'
Quoted 4 lines · Dafna Hirschfeld
Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' to improve readability. Issues found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by Dafna Hirschfeld <[email protected]>
Quoted 47 lines
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c +1
-1@@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ int lprocfs_write_frac_u64_helper(const char __user *buffer, {char kernbuf[22 ], *end, *pbuf;__u64 whole, frac =0 , units; -unsigned frac_d =1 ; +unsigned int frac_d =1 ;int sign =1 ;if (count > (sizeof (kernbuf) -1 ))drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +4
-5@@ -1797,10 +1797,10 @@ int lu_env_refill(struct lu_env *env)EXPORT_SYMBOL (lu_env_refill);struct lu_site_stats { -unsigned lss_populated; -unsigned lss_max_search; -unsigned lss_total; -unsigned lss_busy; +unsigned int lss_populated; +unsigned int lss_max_search; +unsigned int lss_total; +unsigned int lss_busy; }; static void lu_site_stats_get(struct cfs_hash *hs, --2.7.4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/008d96a213ae753dc3f330ca22e09be5471e8ab1.1520014706.git.dafna3%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.