Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments

PATCH In review Robert P. J. Day 2 participants 2 messages Jul 23, 2014

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments

---

meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index 64a0a44..bfecb8c 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
meta-oe/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index 2a5a428..9d7a60a 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index f3fc45d..d8faf21 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index ca81eb1..9289a8f 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
Signature · 7 lines
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Robert P. J. Day

Applying: Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
error: patch failed: meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: meta-oe/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-oe/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf:4
error: toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0001 Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments

Can you please rebase and resend?

Quoted 71 lines

---

meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index 64a0a44..bfecb8c 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
meta-oe/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index 2a5a428..9d7a60a 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index f3fc45d..d8faf21 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf +1 -1
index ca81eb1..9289a8f 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
 # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
 # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
 # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
 # not matter.
 
Signature · 15 lines
-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Signature · 1 line
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]