memcg: move LRU size accounting on reparenting instead of copying it
Subsystems (5)
Shakeel Butt
reviewerPATCH 1/1 memcg: move LRU size accounting on reparenting instead of copying it
When a memory cgroup is offlined its LRU folios are reparented to the parent. lruvec_reparent_lru() splices the child's lists into the parent's and credits the parent with the child's per-zone lru_zone_size[], but never clears the child's copy, so the size is copied rather than moved. lru_gen_reparent_memcg() does the same for MGLRU.
The parent is left correct, credited with exactly the folios it took over. The stale value sits on the child and nothing will correct it:folio->memcg_data now resolves to the parent, so every later update_lru_size() for those folios goes there.
Dying cgroups are not freed immediately and mem_cgroup_iter() still walks them, so shrink_lruvec() keeps being called on them. get_scan_count() reads the phantom counter through lruvec_lru_size() and the scan loop then grinds through nr[] in SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX steps against an empty list, for as long as the dead cgroup lives. Under MGLRU the MGLRU scanner runs instead, but count_shadow_nodes() sums all of NR_LRU_LISTS through lruvec_lru_size() and over-budgets the shadow node limit just the same.
On one 251 GiB host a sweep of every mz->lru_zone_size[] found 380 counters describing folios on no list at all: 124777314 pages, 476 GiB, 1.89x the machine's RAM, across 57 cgroups. All were on memcgs with CSS_DYING set and CSS_ONLINE clear, and parent/child pairs reported byte-identical sizes.
LRU_UNEVICTABLE needs its size moved too. Its list is deliberately not spliced because lruvec_init() poisons the head - the unevictable LRU is imaginary and folios are never threaded on it - but the size is kept by lruvec_add_folio()/lruvec_del_folio() and those folios account to the parent from here on.
This depends on commit bf4ade7dbd76 ("memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node") and must not be backported ahead of it. Without that invariant a folio's objcg can belong to another node, so a folio already spliced onto the parent's list can still resolve to the child's lruvec until the objcg's node is reparented in a later iteration of memcg_reparent_objcgs(); clearing the child's counter early then lets lruvec_del_folio() underflow it and trip the WARN_ONCE()/VM_BUG_ON() in mem_cgroup_update_lru_size().
--- mm/folio.c | 9 +++++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
mm/folio.c +9 -0
@@ -1130,7 +1130,16 @@ static void lruvec_reparent_lru(struct lruvec *child_lruvec,for_each_managed_zone_pgdat (zone,NODE_DATA (nid), zid,MAX_NR_ZONES -1 ) {unsigned long size =mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid); +if (!size) +continue ; + +/* +* The folios are accounted to the parent from now on, so the +* size has to be moved, not just copied. Leaving it behind +* makes the dying child describe folios it no longer owns. +*/ mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (parent_lruvec, lru, zid, size); +mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid, -(long )size); } }
mm/vmscan.c +5 -0
@@ -4635,7 +4635,12 @@ void lru_gen_reparent_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent,for_each_managed_zone_pgdat (zone,NODE_DATA (nid), zid,MAX_NR_ZONES -1 ) {unsigned long size =mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid); +if (!size) +continue ; + +/* Move the accounting, do not duplicate it. */ mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (parent_lruvec, lru, zid, size); +mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid, -(long )size); } } }
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
Quoted 42 lines · Shakeel Butt
When a memory cgroup is offlined its LRU folios are reparented to the parent.
lruvec_reparent_lru()splices the child's lists into the parent's and credits the parent with the child's per-zone lru_zone_size[], but never clears the child's copy, so the size is copied rather than moved.lru_gen_reparent_memcg()does the same for MGLRU.The parent is left correct, credited with exactly the folios it took over. The stale value sits on the child and nothing will correct it:
folio->memcg_datanow resolves to the parent, so every laterupdate_lru_size()for those folios goes there.Dying cgroups are not freed immediately and
mem_cgroup_iter()still walks them, soshrink_lruvec()keeps being called on them.get_scan_count()reads the phantom counter throughlruvec_lru_size()and the scan loop then grinds through nr[] inSWAP_CLUSTER_MAXsteps against an empty list, for as long as the dead cgroup lives. Under MGLRU the MGLRU scanner runs instead, butcount_shadow_nodes()sums all ofNR_LRU_LISTSthroughlruvec_lru_size()and over-budgets the shadow node limit just the same.On one 251 GiB host a sweep of every mz->lru_zone_size[] found 380 counters describing folios on no list at all: 124777314 pages, 476 GiB, 1.89x the machine's RAM, across 57 cgroups. All were on memcgs with
CSS_DYINGset andCSS_ONLINEclear, and parent/child pairs reported byte-identical sizes.
LRU_UNEVICTABLEneeds its size moved too. Its list is deliberately not spliced becauselruvec_init()poisons the head - the unevictable LRU is imaginary and folios are never threaded on it - but the size is kept by lruvec_add_folio()/lruvec_del_folio() and those folios account to the parent from here on.This depends on commit
bf4ade7dbd76("memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node") and must not be backported ahead of it. Without that invariant a folio's objcg can belong to another node, so a folio already spliced onto the parent's list can still resolve to the child's lruvec until the objcg's node is reparented in a later iteration ofmemcg_reparent_objcgs(); clearing the child's counter early then letslruvec_del_folio()underflow it and trip the WARN_ONCE()/VM_BUG_ON() inmem_cgroup_update_lru_size().
Quoted 4 lines
Fixes 07a6e9a2c199 ("mm: vmscan: prepare for reparenting traditional LRU folios")Fixes f304652609ea ("mm: vmscan: prepare for reparenting MGLRU folios")Cc <[email protected]> # After: bf4ade7dbd76: memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its nodeSigned-off-by Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Quoted 45 lines
--- mm/folio.c | 9 +++++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)mm/folio.c +9
-0@@ -1130,7 +1130,16 @@ static void lruvec_reparent_lru(struct lruvec *child_lruvec,for_each_managed_zone_pgdat (zone,NODE_DATA (nid), zid,MAX_NR_ZONES -1 ) {unsigned long size =mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid); +if (!size) +continue ; + +/* +* The folios are accounted to the parent from now on, so the +* size has to be moved, not just copied. Leaving it behind +* makes the dying child describe folios it no longer owns. +*/ mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (parent_lruvec, lru, zid, size); +mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid, -(long )size); } }mm/vmscan.c +5
-0@@ -4635,7 +4635,12 @@ void lru_gen_reparent_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent,for_each_managed_zone_pgdat (zone,NODE_DATA (nid), zid,MAX_NR_ZONES -1 ) {unsigned long size =mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid); +if (!size) +continue ; + +/* Move the accounting, do not duplicate it. */ mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (parent_lruvec, lru, zid, size); +mem_cgroup_update_lru_size (child_lruvec, lru, zid, -(long )size); } } }Signature · 1 line
2.53.0-Meta
Signature · 2 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs