man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Hi Günther,
Quoted 6 lines
Date: 2026-10-09 16:36:56+0200
From: Günther Noack <[email protected]>Whiteout objects do not count as device files and do not require
CAP_MKNODsince linux.gita3c751a50fe6(2020-05-14; "vfs: allow unprivileged whiteout creation").
Thanks! I checked the referenced commit, and it seems correct.
(I'm not taking the patch yet, in case Miklos wants to comment, but
I will take it eventually.)
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Günther Noack <[email protected]>
You forgot to CC the list. :)
Have a lovely night!
Alex
Quoted 23 lines
--- man/man2/rename.2 | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)man/man2/rename.2 +0
-5@@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code, as of Linux 4.19, at least.) .IP .B RENAME_WHITEOUT -requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the -.B CAP_MKNOD -capability). -.IP -.B RENAME_WHITEOUT can't be employed together with .BR RENAME_EXCHANGE . .IPSignature · 1 line
2.56.0
Signature · 1 line
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Hi,
Quoted 12 lines
Date: 2026-10-09 21:27:05+0200
From: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]>Hi Günther,
Quoted 6 lines
Date: 2026-10-09 16:36:56+0200
From: Günther Noack <[email protected]>Whiteout objects do not count as device files and do not require
CAP_MKNODsince linux.gita3c751a50fe6(2020-05-14; "vfs: allow unprivileged whiteout creation").
Quoted 6 lines
Thanks! I checked the referenced commit, and it seems correct.
Reviewed-by Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]>(I'm not taking the patch yet, in case Miklos wants to comment, but
I will take it eventually.)
I've applied the patch. Thanks!
Cheers,
Alex
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Günther Noack <[email protected]>You forgot to CC the list. :)
Have a lovely night!
AlexQuoted 23 lines
--- man/man2/rename.2 | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)man/man2/rename.2 +0
-5@@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code, as of Linux 4.19, at least.) .IP .B RENAME_WHITEOUT -requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the -.B CAP_MKNOD -capability). -.IP -.B RENAME_WHITEOUT can't be employed together with .BR RENAME_EXCHANGE . .IPSignature · 1 line
2.56.0Signature · 1 line
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Signature · 1 line
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>