FAILED: Patch "io_uring/cmd_net: fix too strict requirement on ioctl" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
Sasha Levin
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 600b665b903733bd60334e86031b157cc823ee55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:27:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/cmd_net: fix too strict requirement on ioctl
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Attempting SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT on an AF_NETLINK socket resulted in an -EOPNOTSUPP, as AF_NETLINK doesn't have an ioctl in its struct proto, but only in struct proto_ops.
Prior to the blamed commit, io_uring_cmd_sock() only had two cmd_op operations, both requiring ioctl, thus the check was warranted.
Since then, 4 new cmd_op operations have been added, none of which depend on ioctl. This patch moves the ioctl check, so it only applies to the original operations.
AFAICT, the ioctl requirement was unintentional, and it wasn't visible in the blamed patch within 3 lines of context.
--- io_uring/cmd_net.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
io_uring/cmd_net.c +6 -3
@@ -160,16 +160,19 @@ int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)struct proto *prot =READ_ONCE (sk->sk_prot);int ret, arg =0 ; -if (!prot || !prot->ioctl) -return -EOPNOTSUPP ; -switch (cmd->cmd_op) {case SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ : +if (!prot || !prot->ioctl) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + ret = prot->ioctl (sk,SIOCINQ , &arg);if (ret)return ret;return arg;case SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ : +if (!prot || !prot->ioctl) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + ret = prot->ioctl (sk,SIOCOUTQ , &arg);if (ret)return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.51.0
Quoted 4 lines · Sasha Levin
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Here's a backport of this one.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
From 2b7642c0c18354cac4bf0185c870bf1fc5374d97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:27:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/cmd_net: fix too strict requirement on ioctl
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Commit 600b665b903733bd60334e86031b157cc823ee55 upstream.
Attempting SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT on an AF_NETLINK socket resulted in an -EOPNOTSUPP, as AF_NETLINK doesn't have an ioctl in its struct proto, but only in struct proto_ops.
Prior to the blamed commit, io_uring_cmd_sock() only had two cmd_op operations, both requiring ioctl, thus the check was warranted.
Since then, 4 new cmd_op operations have been added, none of which depend on ioctl. This patch moves the ioctl check, so it only applies to the original operations.
AFAICT, the ioctl requirement was unintentional, and it wasn't visible in the blamed patch within 3 lines of context.
--- io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
io_uring/uring_cmd.c +6 -3
@@ -338,16 +338,19 @@ int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)struct proto *prot =READ_ONCE (sk->sk_prot);int ret, arg =0 ; -if (!prot || !prot->ioctl) -return -EOPNOTSUPP ; -switch (cmd->cmd_op) {case SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ : +if (!prot || !prot->ioctl) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + ret = prot->ioctl (sk,SIOCINQ , &arg);if (ret)return ret;return arg;case SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ : +if (!prot || !prot->ioctl) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + ret = prot->ioctl (sk,SIOCOUTQ , &arg);if (ret)return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.51.0
Jens Axboe
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 4 lines · Sasha Levin
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.Here's a backport of this one.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Asbjørn already sent this one in yesterday..
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe