Skip to contentSkip to conversation

New: lsblk does not compile for util-linux

Buildroot bugzilla at busybox.net 1 participant 4 messages Aug 30, 2017 – Oct 13, 2017

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

Bug ID: 10281
Summary: lsblk does not compile for util-linux
Product: buildroot
Version: 2017.05.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: adyke at harris.com
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---

lsblk is not compiled with util-linux

Commit 031659024b3cf27bb68dc58d07519b563ef472a1 indicates the BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LSBLK option was removed when upgrading to util-linux 2.28.2 since that version always built lsblk.
However, in when using buildroot 2017.05.2 (which uses util-linux 2.29.2) lsblk is not built.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
#1 lore raw

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] lsblk does not compile for util-linux

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

Carlos Santos <[email protected]> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at buildroot.uclibc |casantos at datacom.ind.br
                   |.org                        |

--- Comment #1 from Carlos Santos <[email protected]> --- The "lsblk" utility is part of the "basic set", now. Ensure that you have BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES selected.

If this does not work then please run "make BR2_DEFCONFIG=/tmp/my-defconfig savedefconfig" and attach the resulting /tmp/my-defconfig to this bug report, so I can try to reproduce the problem here.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
#2 lore raw

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] lsblk does not compile for util-linux

In reply to bugzilla at busybox.net

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

--- Comment #2 from Carlos Santos <[email protected]> ---
I just noticed that commit 031659024b3cf27bb68dc58d07519b563ef472a1 did not add the required entries in Config.in.legacy for BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FINDFS and BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LSBLK selecting BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
#3 lore raw

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] lsblk does not compile for util-linux

In reply to bugzilla at busybox.net

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

Carlos Santos <[email protected]> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Carlos Santos <[email protected]> --- No answer from the submitter in more than 30 days. Closing as invalid, since lsblk is enabled by the "basic set" option, as already explained.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.