New: ACPID shouldn't depend on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11241
Bug ID: 11241
Summary: ACPID shouldn't depend on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386
Product: buildroot
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: happycorsair at yandex.ru
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---
Nowadays multiple ARM-based devboards provide ACPI, so this restriction is not a good option anymore. For example I've used standard Buildroot acpi package on Cubieboard 6 without any issue.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Buildroot] [Bug 11241] ACPID shouldn't depend on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11241
Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> ---
Sorry, what firmware provides ACPI on your cubieboard? Or do you just mean that some of the functionality of acpid is usable without firmware/kernel support? drivers/acpi in the Linux kernel is guarded by ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI, which is selected for arm64/ia64/x86.
With that said, if it builds on other architectures and there are use cases for it on those, then I don't have a problem exposing it.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Buildroot] [Bug 11241] ACPID shouldn't depend on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386
In reply to bugzilla at busybox.nethttps://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11241
--- Comment #2 from happycorsair at yandex.ru ---
Hi, Peter!
I'm not a specialist in ACPI or power management, so please don't blame me a lot :)
It seems to me, that you are right. All ACPI-related options in Cubieboard 6 kernel config are disabled (it's ARM, not ARM64). But at the same time, acpid handles power button pushes and powers off the board. If no acpid is running, I can only reboot the board by long push.
So, it's useful. I found no building issues.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Buildroot] [Bug 11241] ACPID shouldn't depend on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386
In reply to bugzilla at busybox.nethttps://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11241
Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED--- Comment #3 from Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> --- Fixed by
https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?h=next&id=1bcc6e87410c76efb2f4bdd9714916acef84b7d0.
Thanks!
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.