Skip to contentSkip to conversation

vmxnet3 interface not receiving any packets with dpdk-22.11.1

Bug 1209 [email protected] 3 participants 3 messages Mar 31, 2023 – Apr 12, 2023

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1209

            Bug ID: 1209
           Summary: vmxnet3 interface not receiving any packets with
                    dpdk-22.11.1
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 22.11
          Hardware: x86
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: Normal
         Component: ethdev
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]

Target Milestone: ---

Hi,
I recently upgraded our DPDK to 22.11.1 and observed that the guest vmxnet3 interface is not receiving any unicast packets. It's able to receive the broadcast packets though. We enable promiscuous and all-multicast on the port.

rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(port);
rte_eth_allmulticast_enable(port);

This happens when the vswitch has only 2 ports attached.

On further triaging,
- I could find out that on the same setup, dpdk-20.11 works fine.
- Upon comparing the working scenario and non-working scenario on esx host, I could notice that there is some difference in port configuration of vswitch.

Below is the snapshot of working case, where the ethFRP:frame routing { requested:filter flags is 0x1d.

port {
port index:365
vnic index:0x00000003 portCfg:build_1_15_2_vm-v3--p1e3-u2e3 dvPortId:
clientName:sjc-cms-esx15-csm02-pan1
clientType: 5 -> VMM Virtual NIC
clientSubType: 9 -> Vmxnet3 Client
world leader:2120158
flags: 0x40013 -> IN_USE ENABLED WORLD_ASSOC CONNECTED Impl customized blocked flags:0x00000000 Passthru status: 0x8 -> DISABLED_BY_HOST fixed Hw Id:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:

   ethFRP:frame routing {
      requested:filter {
         flags:0x0000001d
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0 
         [1]: 0x0 
      }
      accepted:filter {
         flags:0x0000001d
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0 
         [1]: 0x0 
      }

}

For the non-working case the flag is set to 0x09.

port {
port index:365
vnic index:0x00000003 portCfg:build_1_15_2_vm-v3--p1e3-u2e3 dvPortId:
clientName:sjc-cms-esx15-csm02-pan1
clientType: 5 -> VMM Virtual NIC
clientSubType: 9 -> Vmxnet3 Client
world leader:2120158
flags: 0x40013 -> IN_USE ENABLED WORLD_ASSOC CONNECTED Impl customized blocked flags:0x00000000 Passthru status: 0x8 -> DISABLED_BY_HOST fixed Hw Id:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:

   ethFRP:frame routing {
      requested:filter {
         flags:0x00000009
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0 
         [1]: 0x0 
      }
      accepted:filter {
         flags:0x00000009
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0 
         [1]: 0x0 
      }

}
filter supported features: 0 -> NONE
filter properties: 0 -> NONE
rx mode: 0 -> INLINE
tune mode: 0 -> default
fastpath switch ID:0xffffffff
fastpath port ID:0xffffffff
}

I think these are some of the flags set by vmxnet3 device and in dpdk-22.11, its not updating the flags.

Could you please help on this??

I would try to create a simplest test setup with testpmd and update here.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
#1 lore raw

Hello Jochen,

Quoted 107 lines · On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:07 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

Bug ID 1209
Summary vmxnet3 interface not receiving any packets with dpdk-22.11.1 Product DPDK
Version 22.11
Hardware x86
OS All
Status UNCONFIRMED
Severity critical
Priority Normal
Component ethdev
Assignee [email protected]
Reporter [email protected]
Target Milestone ---

Hi,
I recently upgraded our DPDK to 22.11.1 and observed that the guest vmxnet3 interface is not receiving any unicast packets. It's able to receive the broadcast packets though. We enable promiscuous and all-multicast on the port.

rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(port);
rte_eth_allmulticast_enable(port);

This happens when the vswitch has only 2 ports attached.

On further triaging,

(quoted diff) +0 -2
-  I could find out that on the same setup, dpdk-20.11 works fine.
-  Upon comparing the working scenario and non-working scenario on esx host, I

could notice that there is some difference in port configuration of vswitch.

Below is the snapshot of working case, where the ethFRP:frame routing { requested:filter flags is 0x1d.

port {
   port index:365
   vnic index:0x00000003
   portCfg:build_1_15_2_vm-v3--p1e3-u2e3
   dvPortId:
   clientName:sjc-cms-esx15-csm02-pan1
   clientType: 5 -> VMM Virtual NIC
   clientSubType: 9 -> Vmxnet3 Client
   world leader:2120158
   flags: 0x40013 -> IN_USE ENABLED WORLD_ASSOC CONNECTED
   Impl customized blocked flags:0x00000000
   Passthru status: 0x8 -> DISABLED_BY_HOST
   fixed Hw Id:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
   ethFRP:frame routing {
      requested:filter {
         flags:0x0000001d
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
      accepted:filter {
         flags:0x0000001d
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
   }

For the non-working case the flag is set to 0x09.

port {
   port index:365
   vnic index:0x00000003
   portCfg:build_1_15_2_vm-v3--p1e3-u2e3
   dvPortId:
   clientName:sjc-cms-esx15-csm02-pan1
   clientType: 5 -> VMM Virtual NIC
   clientSubType: 9 -> Vmxnet3 Client
   world leader:2120158
   flags: 0x40013 -> IN_USE ENABLED WORLD_ASSOC CONNECTED
   Impl customized blocked flags:0x00000000
   Passthru status: 0x8 -> DISABLED_BY_HOST
   fixed Hw Id:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
   ethFRP:frame routing {
      requested:filter {
         flags:0x00000009
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
      accepted:filter {
         flags:0x00000009
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
   }
   filter supported features: 0 -> NONE
   filter properties: 0 -> NONE
   rx mode: 0 -> INLINE
   tune mode: 0 -> default
   fastpath switch ID:0xffffffff
   fastpath port ID:0xffffffff
}
Quoted 2 lines

I think these are some of the flags set by vmxnet3 device and in dpdk-22.11, its not updating the flags.

As a maintainer of the net/vmxnet3 driver, could you please register to bugzilla?
And please have a look.

Thanks!

Signature · 1 line
David marchand
#2 lore raw

Hi Jochen,

Could you please help here?

Regards
Amiya

Quoted 129 lines · David Marchand

Hello Jochen,

Quoted 15 lines · On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:07 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

Bug ID 1209
Summary vmxnet3 interface not receiving any packets with dpdk-22.11.1 Product DPDK
Version 22.11
Hardware x86
OS All
Status UNCONFIRMED
Severity critical
Priority Normal
Component ethdev
Assignee [email protected]
Reporter [email protected]
Target Milestone ---

Quoted 2 lines

Hi,
I recently upgraded our DPDK to 22.11.1 and observed that the guest

vmxnet3

Quoted 2 lines

interface is not receiving any unicast packets. It's able to receive the broadcast packets though. We enable promiscuous and all-multicast on the

port.

Review

Quoted 9 lines

rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(port);
rte_eth_allmulticast_enable(port);

This happens when the vswitch has only 2 ports attached.

On further triaging,

(quoted diff) +0 -2
-  I could find out that on the same setup, dpdk-20.11 works fine.
-  Upon comparing the working scenario and non-working scenario on esx

host, I

Quoted 1 line

could notice that there is some difference in port configuration of

vswitch.

Quoted 78 lines

Below is the snapshot of working case, where the ethFRP:frame routing { requested:filter flags is 0x1d.

port {
   port index:365
   vnic index:0x00000003
   portCfg:build_1_15_2_vm-v3--p1e3-u2e3
   dvPortId:
   clientName:sjc-cms-esx15-csm02-pan1
   clientType: 5 -> VMM Virtual NIC
   clientSubType: 9 -> Vmxnet3 Client
   world leader:2120158
   flags: 0x40013 -> IN_USE ENABLED WORLD_ASSOC CONNECTED
   Impl customized blocked flags:0x00000000
   Passthru status: 0x8 -> DISABLED_BY_HOST
   fixed Hw Id:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
   ethFRP:frame routing {
      requested:filter {
         flags:0x0000001d
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
      accepted:filter {
         flags:0x0000001d
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
   }

For the non-working case the flag is set to 0x09.

port {
   port index:365
   vnic index:0x00000003
   portCfg:build_1_15_2_vm-v3--p1e3-u2e3
   dvPortId:
   clientName:sjc-cms-esx15-csm02-pan1
   clientType: 5 -> VMM Virtual NIC
   clientSubType: 9 -> Vmxnet3 Client
   world leader:2120158
   flags: 0x40013 -> IN_USE ENABLED WORLD_ASSOC CONNECTED
   Impl customized blocked flags:0x00000000
   Passthru status: 0x8 -> DISABLED_BY_HOST
   fixed Hw Id:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
   ethFRP:frame routing {
      requested:filter {
         flags:0x00000009
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
      accepted:filter {
         flags:0x00000009
         unicastAddr:00:50:56:b8:20:aa:
         numMulticastAddresses:0
         multicastAddresses:
         LADRF:[0]: 0x0
         [1]: 0x0
      }
   }
   filter supported features: 0 -> NONE
   filter properties: 0 -> NONE
   rx mode: 0 -> INLINE
   tune mode: 0 -> default
   fastpath switch ID:0xffffffff
   fastpath port ID:0xffffffff
}
Quoted 1 line

I think these are some of the flags set by vmxnet3 device and in

dpdk-22.11,

Quoted 1 line

its not updating the flags.

As a maintainer of the net/vmxnet3 driver, could you please register to bugzilla?
And please have a look.

Thanks!

--
David marchand