New: unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230
Summary: unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: P1
Component: ext4
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
Regression: No
Distribution: Archlinux
Hardware Environment:
Processor: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz (Dual-Core)
Memory: 2GB
lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL Memory Controller Hub (rev 02)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 01)
00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 01)
00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 4 (rev 01)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 01)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 01)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 01)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 01)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev e1) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR (ICH7 Family) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller (rev 01)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR/GH (ICH7 Family) SATA IDE Controller (rev 01)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 01) 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02)
04:00.0 Mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC40718 (SATA 300 TX4) (rev 02)
Software:
e2fsprogs-1.41.5-2
Problem description:
I have a linux software raid10 using four discs (SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB Sata) created with the following command:
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --assume-clean --chunk=128 --level=raid10 --raid-devices=4 --spare-devices=0 --layout=f2 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1
On this md0 i created a ext4 filesystem using:
mkfs.ext4 -O large_file,dir_index,sparse_super -E stride=32,stripe-width=128 -b 4096 /dev/md0
After doing some load on the disks, coping some files and so on, i rebooted the machine. I tried to mount the filesystem after the reboot manualy, but i couldnt, i was advised to run fsck, which gives me errors:
[root@hal9000 ~]# fsck /dev/md0
fsck 1.41.5 (23-Apr-2009)
e2fsck 1.41.5 (23-Apr-2009)
fsck.ext4: Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks...
Group descriptor 0 checksum is invalid. Fix<y>? yes Group descriptor 1 checksum is invalid. Fix<y>? yes Group descriptor 2 checksum is invalid. Fix<y>? yes Group descriptor 3 checksum is invalid. Fix<y>? yes Group descriptor 4 checksum is invalid. Fix<y>? yes
Group descriptor ... checksum is invalid. Fix<y>? yes Group descriptor 14904 checksum is invalid. Fix? yes
/dev/md0 contains a file system with errors, check forced. Resize inode not valid. Recreate? yes
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 83425 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix? yes
Inode 83425 has imagic flag set. Clear? yes
Inode 83425 has a extra size (24906) which is invalid Fix? yes
Inode 83426 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix? yes
Inode 83426 has imagic flag set. Clear? yes
Inode 83426 has a extra size (15123) which is invalid Fix? yes
Inode 83426 has compression flag set on filesystem without compression support.
Clear? yes
Error while reading over extent tree in inode 83426: Corrupt extent header Clear inode? yes
Inode 83426, i_blocks is 2892048078, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83427 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix? yes
Inode 83427 has a extra size (30948) which is invalid Fix? yes
Inode 83427 has compression flag set on filesystem without compression support.
Clear? yes
Inode 83427, i_size is 6852659100897434679, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83427, i_blocks is 24634205603455, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83428 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix? yes
Inode 83428 has imagic flag set. Clear? yes
Inode 83428 has a extra size (10145) which is invalid Fix? yes
Inode 83428 has INDEX_FL flag set but is not a directory. Clear HTree index? yes
Inode 83428, i_size is 4063880120011657287, should be 0. Fix? yes
......
Inode 83432 has INDEX_FL flag set but is not a directory. Clear HTree index? yes
Inode 83432, i_size is 10651702139991005323, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83432, i_blocks is 75253109187231, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83436 has compression flag set on filesystem without compression support.
Clear? yes
Inode 83436 has INDEX_FL flag set but is not a directory. Clear HTree index? yes
Inode 83436, i_size is 1452293747930507946, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83436, i_blocks is 225351860648724, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83437 has compression flag set on filesystem without compression support.
Clear? yes
Inode 83437, i_size is 10409160169330118727, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83437, i_blocks is 52103229380007, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83440 has compression flag set on filesystem without compression support.
Clear? yes
Inode 83440 has a bad extended attribute block 258978553. Clear? yes
Inode 83440, i_size is 16993295139261714503, should be 0. Fix? yes
Inode 83440, i_blocks is 267701257729082, should be 0. Fix? yes
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 13230] unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230
--- Comment #2 from Florian Engelhardt <[email protected]> 2009-05-04 07:42:22 --- I was coping files via NFS from my computer under my desk to that server. Something around 380 GB.
The filesystem was serving until reboot ;)
As i don´t need the server right now, i can build a tunnel and give you root access to that machine via ssh.
Signature · 6 lines
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Bug 13230] unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
In reply to [email protected]http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230
--- Comment #3 from Florian Engelhardt <[email protected]> 2009-05-15 16:58:14 --- Any news on this? I need to have this machine up and running stable until 15th of June, so i can still help, try patches, give you root access, ...
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 13230] unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
In reply to [email protected]http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230
--- Comment #4 from Theodore Tso <[email protected]> 2009-05-15 17:24:56 --- As a matter of fact we think we found the cause of the problem just yesterday.
The fix is now in mainline:
Was this a problem you can easily reproduce? If so, I'd appreciate it if you could try out this patch, and confirm that you can no longer reproduce the problem with this patch.
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
[Bug 13230] unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
In reply to [email protected]http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230
Florian Engelhardt <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE--- Comment #5 from Florian Engelhardt <[email protected]> 2009-06-10 06:47:42 --- I applied that patch to the 2.6.29.4 kernel and recreated the filesystem. It´s up and running since four days now. I was not able to reproduce this bug. Good work, thanks so far. Is this patch also in the 2.6.30 mainline? This will allow me to switch back to the official kernel of my distribution.
Signature · 6 lines
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Bug 13230] unexplained fsck error with ext4 on software raid 10
In reply to [email protected]http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230
Theodore Tso <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Theodore Tso <[email protected]> 2009-06-10 13:53:11 --- Yes, this patch is in 2.6.30, and it's in the 2.6.27.y and 2.6.29.y patches which Greg sent out for review yesterday. So 2.6.27.25 and 2.6.29.5 should have this patch when they get released next week.
Signature · 3 lines
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.