Skip to contentSkip to conversation

BPF: eval_call() is messing bounds of return types different of RTE_BPF_ARG_RAW

dpdk-dev [email protected] 1 participant 2 messages Jun 27, 2019 – Jul 5, 2019

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298

Bug ID: 298
Summary: BPF: eval_call() is messing bounds of return types
different of RTE_BPF_ARG_RAW
Product: DPDK
Version: 19.08
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: other
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 42
--> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=42&action=edit
Patch eval_call() in lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c

eval_call() in lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c calls eval_max_bound() on the BPF return value for all types. This makes the verifier fails when a BPF helper function returns a pointer that is later dereferenced. The error message when this happens should be similar to this one: evaluate: memory boundary violation at pc: 7.

evaluate() in the same file only calls eval_max_bound() on the parameter of the BPF program when its type is RTE_BPF_ARG_RAW. Based on this knowledge, I tested the attached patch and it works. But I'm not knowledgable enough on librte_bpf to know if this is the correct way to solve this problem.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
#1 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298

Michel Machado ([email protected]) changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|IN_PROGRESS                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Michel Machado ([email protected]) --- I've tested your version of the patch and it works fine. Thank you.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.