Skip to contentSkip to conversation

IP Reassembly with more 4 packets Segfault

dpdk-dev [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Aug 13, 2019

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338

            Bug ID: 338
           Summary: IP Reassembly with more 4 packets Segfault
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 17.11
          Hardware: x86
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: core
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]

Target Milestone: ---

I have looked at previous mails on this mailing list and also elsewhere on Google and could not find any information related to this.

Whenever I have to reassemble a valid IP packet with more than 4 fragments, I see a crash. Stack trace below. I assume the number 4 comes from RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG_MAX_FRAG.

To trigger this, I sent a fragmented IP packet via - ping <DPDK IP addr> -s 6000

(gdb) bt
#0 ip_frag_lookup (tbl=tbl@entry=0x7fff7a32ce80, key=key@entry=0x7ffff6eeee10, tms=tms@entry=2602613353715115, free=free@entry=0x7ffff6eeedb8,

    stale=stale@entry=0x7ffff6eeedc0) at

/usr/src/debug/dpdk-17.11.2-6.fc30.x86_64/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c:379 #1 0x00007ffff7c021f6 in ip_frag_find (tbl=tbl@entry=0x7fff7a32ce80, dr=dr@entry=0x7fff7a32c900, key=key@entry=0x7ffff6eeee10, tms=2602613353715115)
at
/usr/src/debug/dpdk-17.11.2-6.fc30.x86_64/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c:286 #2 0x00007ffff7c00280 in rte_ipv4_frag_reassemble_packet (tbl=0x7fff7a32ce80, dr=0x7fff7a32c900, mb=0x7fff8b71b480, tms=<optimized out>,
ip_hdr=<optimized out>) at
/usr/src/debug/dpdk-17.11.2-6.fc30.x86_64/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c:160

(gdb) f 0
#0 ip_frag_lookup (tbl=tbl@entry=0x7fff7a32ce80, key=key@entry=0x7ffff6eeee10, tms=tms@entry=2602613353715115, free=free@entry=0x7ffff6eeedb8,

    stale=stale@entry=0x7ffff6eeedc0) at

/usr/src/debug/dpdk-17.11.2-6.fc30.x86_64/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c:379
379 if (ip_frag_key_cmp(key, &p1[i].key) == 0)

(gdb) f 1
#1 0x00007ffff7c021f6 in ip_frag_find (tbl=tbl@entry=0x7fff7a32ce80, dr=dr@entry=0x7fff7a32c900, key=key@entry=0x7ffff6eeee10, tms=2602613353715115)
at
/usr/src/debug/dpdk-17.11.2-6.fc30.x86_64/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c:286
286 if ((pkt = ip_frag_lookup(tbl, key, tms, &free, &stale)) == NULL) {

(gdb) f 2
#2 0x00007ffff7c00280 in rte_ipv4_frag_reassemble_packet (tbl=0x7fff7a32ce80, dr=0x7fff7a32c900, mb=0x7fff8b71b480, tms=<optimized out>,
ip_hdr=<optimized out>) at
/usr/src/debug/dpdk-17.11.2-6.fc30.x86_64/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c:160
160 if ((fp = ip_frag_find(tbl, dr, &key, tms)) == NULL) {

Is this a known issue? Are there any workaround?

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.