New: get_mempolicy(2) inconsistent with numaif.h
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
Bug ID: 97051
Summary: get_mempolicy(2) inconsistent with numaif.h
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages-ztI5WcYan/[email protected]
Reporter: nyh-TS7m/[email protected]
Regression: No
get_mempolicy(2)'s synopsis is:
#include <numaif.h>
int get_mempolicy(int *mode, unsigned long *nodemask,
unsigned long maxnode, unsigned long addr, unsigned long flags);
However, the actual prototype in numif.h (and implementation in numactl's syscall.c) is subtly different:
long get_mempolicy(int *policy, const unsigned long *nmask,
unsigned long maxnode, void *addr, int flags);
The funny thing is, that prototype is isn't quite right either - it pretends nmask is a const pointer, but it most definitely isn't, and the data pointed by it get written to. But that isn't a man-page bug.
Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): bug-97051-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/
[Bug 97051] get_mempolicy(2) inconsistent with numaif.h
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]> --- Andi, could you comment on this bug?
Thanks,
Michael
Quoted 37 lines · On 22 April 2015 at 00:28, <bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@p…
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
Bug ID: 97051
Summary:get_mempolicy(2)inconsistent withnumaif.h
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages-ztI5WcYan/[email protected]
Reporter: nyh-TS7m/[email protected]
Regression: Noget_mempolicy(2)'s synopsis is:
#include <
numaif.h>int get_mempolicy(int *mode, unsigned long *nodemask,
unsigned long maxnode, unsigned long addr, unsigned long flags);However, the actual prototype in
numif.h(and implementation in numactl'ssyscall.c) is subtly different:long get_mempolicy(int *policy, const unsigned long *nmask,
unsigned long maxnode, void *addr, int flags);The funny thing is, that prototype is isn't quite right either - it pretends nmask is a const pointer, but it most definitely isn't, and the data pointed by it get written to. But that isn't a man-page bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Signature · 6 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html