btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation
v3 cover btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation
In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven number of devices.
This patch always sorts the devices before allocating, and allocates the stripes on the devices with the most available space, as long as there is enough space available. In a low space situation, it first tries to maximize striping.
The patch also simplifies the allocator and reduces the checks for corner cases.
The simplification is done by several means. First, it defines the properties of each RAID type upfront. These properties are used afterwards instead of differentiating cases in several places.
Second, the old allocator defined a minimum stripe size for each block group type, tried to find a large enough chunk, and if this fails just allocates a smaller one. This is now done in one step. The largest possible chunk (up to max_chunk_size) is searched and allocated.
Because we now have only one pass, the allocation of the map (struct map_lookup) is moved down to the point where the number of stripes is already known. This way we avoid reallocation of the map.
We still avoid allocating stripes that are not a multiple of STRIPE_SIZE.
Changes from v1:
- split into multiple parts
- added some comments
- generated with --patience for better readability
Changes from v2:
- rebased to current master
- bugfix for 'single' raid type; the initial parameter initialization lacked a case for the 'single' type, thus leaving devs_max at the wrong value
Arne Jansen (3):
btrfs: move btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes to super.c
btrfs: heed alloc_start
btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation
fs/btrfs/super.c | 25 +++ fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 494 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 16 +-- 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 338 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v3 1/3 btrfs: move btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes to super.c
this function won't be used here anymore, so move it super.c where it is used for df-calculation
--- fs/btrfs/super.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 ------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 15 --------------- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/super.c +25 -0
@@ -913,6 +913,31 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)return 0 ; } +/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ +int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes (const void *dev_info1,const void *dev_info2) +{ +if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail > + ((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info2)->max_avail) +return -1 ; +else if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail < + ((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info2)->max_avail) +return 1 ; +else +return 0 ; +} + +/* +* sort the devices by max_avail, in which max free extent size of each device +* is stored.(Descending Sort) +*/ +static inline void btrfs_descending_sort_devices ( +struct btrfs_device_info *devices, +size_t nr_devices) +{ +sort (devices, nr_devices,sizeof (struct btrfs_device_info ), + btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes,NULL ); +} +/* * The helper to calc the free space on the devices that can be used to store * file data.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0 -13
@@ -2282,19 +2282,6 @@ static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 type, u64 calc_size,return calc_size * num_stripes; } -/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ -int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes (const void *dev_info1,const void *dev_info2) -{ -if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail > - ((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info2)->max_avail) -return -1 ; -else if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail < - ((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info2)->max_avail) -return 1 ; -else -return 0 ; -} -static int __btrfs_calc_nstripes (struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,u64 type,int *num_stripes,int *min_stripes,int *sub_stripes)
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0 -15
@@ -157,21 +157,6 @@ struct map_lookup {struct btrfs_bio_stripe stripes[]; }; -/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ -int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes (const void *dev_info1,const void *dev_info2); - -/* -* sort the devices by max_avail, in which max free extent size of each device -* is stored.(Descending Sort) -*/ -static inline void btrfs_descending_sort_devices ( -struct btrfs_device_info *devices, -size_t nr_devices) -{ -sort (devices, nr_devices,sizeof (struct btrfs_device_info ), - btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes,NULL ); -} -int btrfs_account_dev_extents_size (struct btrfs_device *device,u64 start,u64 end,u64 *length);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] btrfs: move btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes to super.c
Quoted 1 line · Arne Jansen
this function won't be used here anymore, so move it
super.cwhere it=
is
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,=
Quoted 14 lines
used for df-calculation
Signed-off-by Arne Jansen <[email protected]>---
=A0fs/btrfs/super.c =A0 | =A0 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ =A0fs/btrfs/volumes.c | =A0 13 ------------- =A0fs/btrfs/volumes.h | =A0 15 --------------- =A03 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)fs/btrfs/super.c +0
-0@@ -913,6 +913,31 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,=
int *flags, char *data)
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 917
Quoted 5 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +2
-0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return 0; =A0} +/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ +int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes(const void *dev_info1, const void *d=
ev_info2)
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 921
Quoted 4 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +3
-0+{ + =A0 =A0 =A0 if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail = + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info2)->max_av=
ail)
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 923
Quoted 2 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +2
-0+ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return -1; + =A0 =A0 =A0 else if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_a=
vail <
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 924
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/super.c +1
-0+ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_inf=
o2)->max_avail)
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 931
Quoted 7 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +7
-0+ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return 1; + =A0 =A0 =A0 else + =A0 =A0 =A0 return 0; +} + +/* +* sort the devices by max_avail, in which max free extent size of e=
ach device
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
Quoted 4 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +4
-0+* is stored.(Descending Sort) +*/ +static inline void btrfs_descending_sort_devices( + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0 =A0 struct btrfs_device_info *devices,
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 936
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/super.c +1
-0+ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0 =A0 size_t nr_devices)
fs/btrfs/super.c static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb,= · line 938
Quoted 2 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +2
-0+{ + =A0 =A0 =A0 sort(devices, nr_devices, sizeof(struct btrfs_device_in=
fo),
Quoted 5 lines
fs/btrfs/super.c +3
-0+ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes, NULL); +} +=A0/*
=A0* The helper to calc the free space on the devices that can be use=
d to store
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 ty=
Quoted 6 lines
=A0* file data.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-0@@ -2282,19 +2282,6 @@ static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 ty=
pe, u64 calc_size,
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 ty= · line 2286
Quoted 5 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-2=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return calc_size * num_stripes; =A0} -/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ -int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes(const void *dev_info1, const void *d=
ev_info2)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 ty= · line 2290
Quoted 4 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-3-{ - =A0 =A0 =A0 if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_avail = - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info2)->max_av=
ail)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 ty= · line 2292
Quoted 2 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-2- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return -1; - =A0 =A0 =A0 else if (((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_info1)->max_a=
vail <
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 ty= · line 2293
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-1- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0((struct btrfs_device_info *)dev_inf=
o2)->max_avail)
Quoted 6 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-5- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return 1; - =A0 =A0 =A0 else - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return 0; -} -=A0static int __btrfs_calc_nstripes(struct
btrfs_fs_devices*fs_devic=
es, u64 type,
Quoted 1 line
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 int *=
num_stripes, int *min_stripes,
Quoted 1 line
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 int *=
sub_stripes)
fs/btrfs/volumes.h struct map_lookup { · line 161
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-2@@ -157,21 +157,6 @@ struct map_lookup { =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0struct btrfs_bio_stripe stripes[]; =A0}; -/* Used to sort the devices by max_avail(descending sort) */ -int btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes(const void *dev_info1, const void *d=
ev_info2);
fs/btrfs/volumes.h struct map_lookup {
Quoted 3 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-3- -/* -* sort the devices by max_avail, in which max free extent size of e=
ach device
fs/btrfs/volumes.h struct map_lookup {
Quoted 4 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-4-* is stored.(Descending Sort) -*/ -static inline void btrfs_descending_sort_devices( - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0 =A0 struct btrfs_device_info *devices,
fs/btrfs/volumes.h struct map_lookup { · line 169
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-1- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0 =A0 size_t nr_devices)
fs/btrfs/volumes.h struct map_lookup { · line 171
Quoted 2 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-2-{ - =A0 =A0 =A0 sort(devices, nr_devices, sizeof(struct btrfs_device_in=
fo),
Quoted 4 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-3- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes, NULL); -} -=A0int btrfs_account_dev_extents_size(struct
btrfs_device*device, u6=
4 start,
Quoted 1 line
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 u=
64 end, u64 *length);
Quoted 1 line
btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes() can be marked static, since there are no users outside the compilation unit.
Daniel
--=20
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH v3 2/3 btrfs: heed alloc_start
In reply to Arne Jansencurrently alloc_start is disregarded if the requested chunk size is bigger than (device size - alloc_start), but smaller than the device size.
The only situation where I see this could have made sense was when a chunk equal the size of the device has been requested. This was possible as the allocator failed to take alloc_start into account when calculating the request chunk size. As this gets fixed by this patch, the workaround is not necessary anymore.
--- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 +---- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +1 -4
@@ -849,10 +849,7 @@ int find_free_dev_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,/* we don't want to overwrite the superblock on the drive, * so we make sure to start at an offset of at least 1MB */ - search_start =1024 *1024 ; - -if (root->fs_info->alloc_start + num_bytes <= search_end) - search_start =max (root->fs_info->alloc_start, search_start); + search_start =max (root->fs_info->alloc_start,1024ull *1024 ); max_hole_start = search_start; max_hole_size =0 ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v3 3/3 btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation
In reply to Arne JansenIn a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven number of devices.
This patch always sorts the devices before allocating, and allocates the stripes on the devices with the most available space, as long as there is enough space available. In a low space situation, it first tries to maximize striping.
The patch also simplifies the allocator and reduces the checks for corner cases.
The simplification is done by several means. First, it defines the properties of each RAID type upfront. These properties are used afterwards instead of differentiating cases in several places.
Second, the old allocator defined a minimum stripe size for each block group type, tried to find a large enough chunk, and if this fails just allocates a smaller one. This is now done in one step. The largest possible chunk (up to max_chunk_size) is searched and allocated.
Because we now have only one pass, the allocation of the map (struct map_lookup) is moved down to the point where the number of stripes is already known. This way we avoid reallocation of the map.
We still avoid allocating stripes that are not a multiple of STRIPE_SIZE.
Changes from v2:
- bugfix for 'single' raid type; the initial parameter initialization lacked a case for the 'single' type, thus leaving devs_max at the wrong value
--- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 476 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 306 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +170 -306
@@ -2268,349 +2268,213 @@ static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,return 0 ; } -static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 type, u64 calc_size, -int num_stripes,int sub_stripes) -{ -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 |BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) -return calc_size; -else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 ) -return calc_size * (num_stripes / sub_stripes); -else -return calc_size * num_stripes; -} - -static int __btrfs_calc_nstripes (struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,u64 type, -int *num_stripes,int *min_stripes, -int *sub_stripes) -{ - *num_stripes =1 ; - *min_stripes =1 ; - *sub_stripes =0 ; - -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 )) { - *num_stripes = fs_devices->rw_devices; - *min_stripes =2 ; - } -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) { - *num_stripes =2 ; - *min_stripes =2 ; - } -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 )) { -if (fs_devices->rw_devices <2 ) -return -ENOSPC ; - *num_stripes =2 ; - *min_stripes =2 ; - } -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) { - *num_stripes = fs_devices->rw_devices; -if (*num_stripes <4 ) -return -ENOSPC ; - *num_stripes &= ~(u32 )1 ; - *sub_stripes =2 ; - *min_stripes =4 ; - } - -return 0 ; -} - -static u64 __btrfs_calc_stripe_size (struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, -u64 proposed_size,u64 type, -int num_stripes,int small_stripe) -{ -int min_stripe_size =1 *1024 *1024 ; -u64 calc_size = proposed_size; -u64 max_chunk_size = calc_size; -int ncopies =1 ; - -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 | -BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | -BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) - ncopies =2 ; - -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA ) { - max_chunk_size =10 * calc_size; - min_stripe_size =64 *1024 *1024 ; - }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA ) { - max_chunk_size =256 *1024 *1024 ; - min_stripe_size =32 *1024 *1024 ; - }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM ) { - calc_size =8 *1024 *1024 ; - max_chunk_size = calc_size *2 ; - min_stripe_size =1 *1024 *1024 ; - } - -/* we don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writeable space */ - max_chunk_size =min (div_factor (fs_devices->total_rw_bytes,1 ), - max_chunk_size); - -if (calc_size * num_stripes > max_chunk_size * ncopies) { - calc_size = max_chunk_size * ncopies; -do_div (calc_size, num_stripes); -do_div (calc_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); - calc_size *=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ; - } - -/* we don't want tiny stripes */ -if (!small_stripe) - calc_size =max_t (u64, min_stripe_size, calc_size); - -/* -* we're about to do_div by the BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN so lets make sure -* we end up with something bigger than a stripe -*/ - calc_size =max_t (u64, calc_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); - -do_div (calc_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); - calc_size *=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ; - -return calc_size; -} - -static struct map_lookup *__shrink_map_lookup_stripes (struct map_lookup *map, -int num_stripes) -{ -struct map_lookup *new; -size_t len =map_lookup_size (num_stripes); - -BUG_ON (map->num_stripes < num_stripes); - -if (map->num_stripes == num_stripes) -return map; - - new =kmalloc (len,GFP_NOFS ); -if (!new) { -/* just change map->num_stripes */ - map->num_stripes = num_stripes; -return map; - } - -memcpy (new, map, len); - new->num_stripes = num_stripes; -kfree (map); -return new; -} -/* -* helper to allocate device space from btrfs_device_info, in which we stored -* max free space information of every device. It is used when we can not -* allocate chunks by default size. -* -* By this helper, we can allocate a new chunk as larger as possible. +* sort the devices in descending order by max_avail, total_avail */ -static int __btrfs_alloc_tiny_space (struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, -struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, -struct btrfs_device_info *devices, -int nr_device,u64 type, -struct map_lookup **map_lookup, -int min_stripes,u64 *stripe_size) +static int btrfs_cmp_device_info (const void *a,const void *b) { -int i, index, sort_again =0 ; -int min_devices = min_stripes; -u64 max_avail, min_free; -struct map_lookup *map = *map_lookup; -int ret; - -if (nr_device < min_stripes) -return -ENOSPC ; - -btrfs_descending_sort_devices (devices, nr_device); - - max_avail = devices[0 ].max_avail; -if (!max_avail) -return -ENOSPC ; - -for (i =0 ; i < nr_device; i++) { -/* -* if dev_offset = 0, it means the free space of this device -* is less than what we need, and we didn't search max avail -* extent on this device, so do it now. -*/ -if (!devices[i].dev_offset) { - ret =find_free_dev_extent (trans, devices[i].dev, - max_avail, - &devices[i].dev_offset, - &devices[i].max_avail); -if (ret !=0 && ret != -ENOSPC ) -return ret; - sort_again =1 ; - } - } - -/* we update the max avail free extent of each devices, sort again */ -if (sort_again) -btrfs_descending_sort_devices (devices, nr_device); - -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) - min_devices =1 ; - -if (!devices[min_devices -1 ].max_avail) -return -ENOSPC ; - - max_avail = devices[min_devices -1 ].max_avail; -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) -do_div (max_avail,2 ); - - max_avail =__btrfs_calc_stripe_size (fs_devices, max_avail, type, - min_stripes,1 ); -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) - min_free = max_avail *2 ; -else - min_free = max_avail; - -if (min_free > devices[min_devices -1 ].max_avail) -return -ENOSPC ; - - map =__shrink_map_lookup_stripes (map, min_stripes); - *stripe_size = max_avail; - - index =0 ; -for (i =0 ; i < min_stripes; i++) { - map->stripes[i].dev = devices[index].dev; - map->stripes[i].physical = devices[index].dev_offset; -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) { - i++; - map->stripes[i].dev = devices[index].dev; - map->stripes[i].physical = devices[index].dev_offset + - max_avail; - } - index++; - } - *map_lookup = map; - +const struct btrfs_device_info *di_a = a; +const struct btrfs_device_info *di_b = b; + +if (di_a->max_avail > di_b->max_avail) +return -1 ; +if (di_a->max_avail < di_b->max_avail) +return 1 ; +if (di_a->total_avail > di_b->total_avail) +return -1 ; +if (di_a->total_avail < di_b->total_avail) +return 1 ;return 0 ; }static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk (struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,struct btrfs_root *extent_root,struct map_lookup **map_ret, -u64 *num_bytes,u64 *stripe_size, +u64 *num_bytes,u64 *stripe_size_out,u64 start,u64 type) {struct btrfs_fs_info *info = extent_root->fs_info;struct btrfs_device *device =NULL ;struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = info->fs_devices;struct list_head *cur; -struct map_lookup *map; +struct map_lookup *map =NULL ;struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;struct extent_map *em; -struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info; -struct list_head private_devs; -u64 calc_size =1024 *1024 *1024 ; -u64 min_free; -u64 avail; +struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info =NULL ; +u64 total_avail; +u64 max_avail;u64 dev_offset; -int num_stripes; -int min_stripes; -int sub_stripes; -int min_devices;/* the min number of devices we need */ -int i; +int num_stripes;/* total number of stripes to allocate */ +int sub_stripes;/* sub_stripes info for map */ +int dev_stripes;/* stripes per dev */ +int devs_max;/* max devs to use */ +int devs_min;/* min devs needed */ +int devs_increment;/* ndevs has to be a multiple of this */ +int ncopies;/* how many copies to data has */ int ret; +u64 max_stripe_size; +u64 max_chunk_size; +u64 stripe_size; +int ndevs;int index; +int i; +int j;if ((type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 ) && (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) {WARN_ON (1 ); type &= ~BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ; } +if (list_empty (&fs_devices->alloc_list))return -ENOSPC ; - ret =__btrfs_calc_nstripes (fs_devices, type, &num_stripes, - &min_stripes, &sub_stripes); -if (ret) -return ret; + + sub_stripes =1 ; + dev_stripes =1 ; + devs_increment =1 ; + ncopies =1 ; + devs_max =0 ;/* 0 == as many as possible */ + devs_min =1 ; + +/* +* define the properties of each RAID type. +* FIXME: move this to a global table and use it in all RAID +* calculation code +*/ +if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) { + dev_stripes =2 ; + ncopies =2 ; + devs_max =1 ; + }else if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 )) { + devs_min =2 ; + }else if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 )) { + devs_increment =2 ; + ncopies =2 ; + devs_max =2 ; + devs_min =2 ; + }else if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) { + sub_stripes =2 ; + devs_increment =2 ; + ncopies =2 ; + devs_min =4 ; + }else { + devs_max =1 ; + } + +if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA ) { + max_stripe_size =1024 *1024 *1024 ; + max_chunk_size =10 * max_stripe_size; + }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA ) { + max_stripe_size =256 *1024 *1024 ; + max_chunk_size = max_stripe_size; + }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM ) { + max_stripe_size =8 *1024 *1024 ; + max_chunk_size =2 * max_stripe_size; + }else { +BUG_ON (1 ); + } + +/* we don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writeable space */ + max_chunk_size =min (div_factor (fs_devices->total_rw_bytes,1 ), + max_chunk_size); devices_info =kzalloc (sizeof (*devices_info) * fs_devices->rw_devices,GFP_NOFS );if (!devices_info)return -ENOMEM ; - map =kmalloc (map_lookup_size (num_stripes),GFP_NOFS ); -if (!map) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto error; - } - map->num_stripes = num_stripes; - cur = fs_devices->alloc_list.next; - index =0 ; - i =0 ; - calc_size =__btrfs_calc_stripe_size (fs_devices, calc_size, type, - num_stripes,0 ); - -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) { - min_free = calc_size *2 ; - min_devices =1 ; - }else { - min_free = calc_size; - min_devices = min_stripes; - } - -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&private_devs); -while (index < num_stripes) { +/* +* in the first pass through the devices list, we gather information +* about the available holes on each device. +*/ + ndevs =0 ; +while (cur != &fs_devices->alloc_list) { device = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_alloc_list);BUG_ON (!device->writeable); + + cur = cur->next; + +if (!device->in_fs_metadata) +continue ; +if (device->total_bytes > device->bytes_used) - avail = device->total_bytes - device->bytes_used; + total_avail = device->total_bytes - device->bytes_used;else - avail =0 ; - cur = cur->next; - -if (device->in_fs_metadata && avail >= min_free) { - ret =find_free_dev_extent (trans, device, min_free, - &devices_info[i].dev_offset, - &devices_info[i].max_avail); -if (ret ==0 ) { -list_move_tail (&device->dev_alloc_list, - &private_devs); - map->stripes[index].dev = device; - map->stripes[index].physical = - devices_info[i].dev_offset; - index++; -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) { - map->stripes[index].dev = device; - map->stripes[index].physical = - devices_info[i].dev_offset + - calc_size; - index++; - } - }else if (ret != -ENOSPC ) - goto error; - - devices_info[i].dev = device; - i++; - }else if (device->in_fs_metadata && - avail >=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ) { - devices_info[i].dev = device; - devices_info[i].max_avail = avail; - i++; - } - -if (cur == &fs_devices->alloc_list) -break ; - } - -list_splice (&private_devs, &fs_devices->alloc_list); -if (index < num_stripes) { -if (index >= min_stripes) { - num_stripes = index; -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) { - num_stripes /= sub_stripes; - num_stripes *= sub_stripes; - } - - map =__shrink_map_lookup_stripes (map, num_stripes); - }else if (i >= min_devices) { - ret =__btrfs_alloc_tiny_space (trans, fs_devices, - devices_info, i, type, - &map, min_stripes, - &calc_size); -if (ret) - goto error; - }else { - ret = -ENOSPC ; + total_avail =0 ; +/* avail is off by max(alloc_start, 1MB), but that is the same +* for all devices, so it doesn't hurt the sorting later on +*/ + + ret =find_free_dev_extent (trans, device, + max_stripe_size * dev_stripes, + &dev_offset, &max_avail); +if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC ) goto error; + +if (ret ==0 ) + max_avail = max_stripe_size * dev_stripes; + +if (max_avail <BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN * dev_stripes) +continue ; + + devices_info[ndevs].dev_offset = dev_offset; + devices_info[ndevs].max_avail = max_avail; + devices_info[ndevs].total_avail = total_avail; + devices_info[ndevs].dev = device; + ++ndevs; + } + +/* +* now sort the devices by hole size / available space +*/ +sort (devices_info, ndevs,sizeof (struct btrfs_device_info ), + btrfs_cmp_device_info,NULL ); + +/* round down to number of usable stripes */ + ndevs -= ndevs % devs_increment; + +if (ndevs < devs_increment * sub_stripes || ndevs < devs_min) { + ret = -ENOSPC ; + goto error; + } + +if (devs_max && ndevs > devs_max) + ndevs = devs_max; +/* +* the primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as many +* devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. +*/ + stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1 ].max_avail; + num_stripes = ndevs * dev_stripes; + +if (stripe_size * num_stripes > max_chunk_size * ncopies) { + stripe_size = max_chunk_size * ncopies; +do_div (stripe_size, num_stripes); + } + +do_div (stripe_size, dev_stripes); +do_div (stripe_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); + stripe_size *=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ; + +BUG_ON (!stripe_size); + + map =kmalloc (map_lookup_size (num_stripes),GFP_NOFS ); +if (!map) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto error; + } + map->num_stripes = num_stripes; + + index =0 ; +for (i =0 ; i < ndevs; ++i) { +for (j =0 ; j < dev_stripes; ++j) { +int s = i * dev_stripes + j; + map->stripes[s].dev = devices_info[i].dev; + map->stripes[s].physical = devices_info[i].dev_offset + + j * stripe_size; } } map->sector_size = extent_root->sectorsize;
@@ -2621,9 +2485,8 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, map->sub_stripes = sub_stripes; *map_ret = map; - *stripe_size = calc_size; - *num_bytes =chunk_bytes_by_type (type, calc_size, - map->num_stripes, sub_stripes); + *stripe_size_out = stripe_size; + *num_bytes = stripe_size * (num_stripes / ncopies);trace_btrfs_chunk_alloc (info->chunk_root, map, start, *num_bytes);
@@ -2658,7 +2521,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret =btrfs_alloc_dev_extent (trans, device, info->chunk_root->root_key.objectid,BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID , - start, dev_offset, calc_size); + start, dev_offset, stripe_size);BUG_ON (ret); index++; }
@@ -2667,8 +2530,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,return 0 ; error: +kfree (devices_info);kfree (map); -kfree (devices_info); +return ret; }
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +1 -0
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct btrfs_device_info {struct btrfs_device *dev;u64 dev_offset;u64 max_avail; +u64 total_avail; };struct map_lookup {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
Hi,
here are my comments, after first review round, mostly on code itself, not the functionality/quality of the allocator (although after this patch the allocator code looks quite straightforward a better to read and understand).
Reviewing the patch directly does not work, Arne's advice was to look at the new code only, which did work, at the function __btrfs_alloc_chunk.
I found several categories of similar issues:
* move declarations from function-level to local scopes; makes the func declaration block less scary :)
* BUG_ONs -- a number of new ones -- I'd rather get rid of them now
* a few more comments would help
* misc code transformations or identifier renames
Quoted 258 lines · Arne Jansen
In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven number of devices.
This patch always sorts the devices before allocating, and allocates the stripes on the devices with the most available space, as long as there is enough space available. In a low space situation, it first tries to maximize striping.
The patch also simplifies the allocator and reduces the checks for corner cases.
The simplification is done by several means. First, it defines the properties of each RAID type upfront. These properties are used afterwards instead of differentiating cases in several places.
Second, the old allocator defined a minimum stripe size for each block group type, tried to find a large enough chunk, and if this fails just allocates a smaller one. This is now done in one step. The largest possible chunk (up tomax_chunk_size) is searched and allocated.
Because we now have only one pass, the allocation of the map (structmap_lookup) is moved down to the point where the number of stripes is already known. This way we avoid reallocation of the map.
We still avoid allocating stripes that are not a multiple ofSTRIPE_SIZE.Changes from v2:
- bugfix for 'single' raid type; the initial parameter initialization lacked a case for the 'single' type, thus leavingdevs_maxat the wrong valueSigned-off-by Arne Jansen <[email protected]>--- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 476 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 306 deletions(-)fs/btrfs/volumes.c +9
-206@@ -2268,349 +2268,213 @@ static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,return 0 ; } -static noinline u64 chunk_bytes_by_type(u64 type, u64 calc_size, -int num_stripes,int sub_stripes) -{ -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 |BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) -return calc_size; -else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 ) -return calc_size * (num_stripes / sub_stripes); -else -return calc_size * num_stripes; -} - -static int __btrfs_calc_nstripes (struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,u64 type, -int *num_stripes,int *min_stripes, -int *sub_stripes) -{ - *num_stripes =1 ; - *min_stripes =1 ; - *sub_stripes =0 ; - -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 )) { - *num_stripes = fs_devices->rw_devices; - *min_stripes =2 ; - } -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) { - *num_stripes =2 ; - *min_stripes =2 ; - } -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 )) { -if (fs_devices->rw_devices <2 ) -return -ENOSPC ; - *num_stripes =2 ; - *min_stripes =2 ; - } -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) { - *num_stripes = fs_devices->rw_devices; -if (*num_stripes <4 ) -return -ENOSPC ; - *num_stripes &= ~(u32 )1 ; - *sub_stripes =2 ; - *min_stripes =4 ; - } - -return 0 ; -} - -static u64 __btrfs_calc_stripe_size (struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, -u64 proposed_size,u64 type, -int num_stripes,int small_stripe) -{ -int min_stripe_size =1 *1024 *1024 ; -u64 calc_size = proposed_size; -u64 max_chunk_size = calc_size; -int ncopies =1 ; - -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 | -BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | -BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) - ncopies =2 ; - -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA ) { - max_chunk_size =10 * calc_size; - min_stripe_size =64 *1024 *1024 ; - }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA ) { - max_chunk_size =256 *1024 *1024 ; - min_stripe_size =32 *1024 *1024 ; - }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM ) { - calc_size =8 *1024 *1024 ; - max_chunk_size = calc_size *2 ; - min_stripe_size =1 *1024 *1024 ; - } - -/* we don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writeable space */ - max_chunk_size =min (div_factor (fs_devices->total_rw_bytes,1 ), - max_chunk_size); - -if (calc_size * num_stripes > max_chunk_size * ncopies) { - calc_size = max_chunk_size * ncopies; -do_div (calc_size, num_stripes); -do_div (calc_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); - calc_size *=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ; - } - -/* we don't want tiny stripes */ -if (!small_stripe) - calc_size =max_t (u64, min_stripe_size, calc_size); - -/* -* we're about to do_div by the BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN so lets make sure -* we end up with something bigger than a stripe -*/ - calc_size =max_t (u64, calc_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); - -do_div (calc_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); - calc_size *=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ; - -return calc_size; -} - -static struct map_lookup *__shrink_map_lookup_stripes (struct map_lookup *map, -int num_stripes) -{ -struct map_lookup *new; -size_t len =map_lookup_size (num_stripes); - -BUG_ON (map->num_stripes < num_stripes); - -if (map->num_stripes == num_stripes) -return map; - - new =kmalloc (len,GFP_NOFS ); -if (!new) { -/* just change map->num_stripes */ - map->num_stripes = num_stripes; -return map; - } - -memcpy (new, map, len); - new->num_stripes = num_stripes; -kfree (map); -return new; -} -/* -* helper to allocate device space from btrfs_device_info, in which we stored -* max free space information of every device. It is used when we can not -* allocate chunks by default size. -* -* By this helper, we can allocate a new chunk as larger as possible. +* sort the devices in descending order by max_avail, total_avail */ -static int __btrfs_alloc_tiny_space (struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, -struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, -struct btrfs_device_info *devices, -int nr_device,u64 type, -struct map_lookup **map_lookup, -int min_stripes,u64 *stripe_size) +static int btrfs_cmp_device_info (const void *a,const void *b) { -int i, index, sort_again =0 ; -int min_devices = min_stripes; -u64 max_avail, min_free; -struct map_lookup *map = *map_lookup; -int ret; - -if (nr_device < min_stripes) -return -ENOSPC ; - -btrfs_descending_sort_devices (devices, nr_device); - - max_avail = devices[0 ].max_avail; -if (!max_avail) -return -ENOSPC ; - -for (i =0 ; i < nr_device; i++) { -/* -* if dev_offset = 0, it means the free space of this device -* is less than what we need, and we didn't search max avail -* extent on this device, so do it now. -*/ -if (!devices[i].dev_offset) { - ret =find_free_dev_extent (trans, devices[i].dev, - max_avail, - &devices[i].dev_offset, - &devices[i].max_avail); -if (ret !=0 && ret != -ENOSPC ) -return ret; - sort_again =1 ; - } - } - -/* we update the max avail free extent of each devices, sort again */ -if (sort_again) -btrfs_descending_sort_devices (devices, nr_device); - -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) - min_devices =1 ; - -if (!devices[min_devices -1 ].max_avail) -return -ENOSPC ; - - max_avail = devices[min_devices -1 ].max_avail; -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) -do_div (max_avail,2 ); - - max_avail =__btrfs_calc_stripe_size (fs_devices, max_avail, type, - min_stripes,1 ); -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) - min_free = max_avail *2 ; -else - min_free = max_avail; - -if (min_free > devices[min_devices -1 ].max_avail) -return -ENOSPC ; - - map =__shrink_map_lookup_stripes (map, min_stripes); - *stripe_size = max_avail; - - index =0 ; -for (i =0 ; i < min_stripes; i++) { - map->stripes[i].dev = devices[index].dev; - map->stripes[i].physical = devices[index].dev_offset; -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) { - i++; - map->stripes[i].dev = devices[index].dev; - map->stripes[i].physical = devices[index].dev_offset + - max_avail; - } - index++; - } - *map_lookup = map; - +const struct btrfs_device_info *di_a = a; +const struct btrfs_device_info *di_b = b; + +if (di_a->max_avail > di_b->max_avail) +return -1 ; +if (di_a->max_avail < di_b->max_avail) +return 1 ;
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2292
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +4
-0+if (di_a->total_avail > di_b->total_avail) +return -1 ; +if (di_a->total_avail < di_b->total_avail) +return 1 ;return 0 ; } static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *extent_root, struct map_lookup **map_ret,
map_out
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2293
Quoted 2 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +1
-1- u64 *num_bytes, u64 *stripe_size, + u64 *num_bytes, u64 *stripe_size_out,
num_bytes_out
there seems to be no formal convention to name outgoing parameters, but at least this makes things more consistent
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2297
Quoted 4 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-0u64 start, u64 type) {struct btrfs_fs_info *info = extent_root->fs_info;struct btrfs_device *device =NULL ;
this variable can be declared in local scope block ...
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2304
Quoted 13 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +3
-6struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = info->fs_devices;struct list_head *cur; -struct map_lookup *map; +struct map_lookup *map =NULL ;struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;struct extent_map *em; -struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info; -struct list_head private_devs; -u64 calc_size =1024 *1024 *1024 ; -u64 min_free; -u64 avail; +struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info =NULL ; +u64 total_avail;
this
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2305
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +1
-0+u64 max_avail;
this
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2306
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-0u64 dev_offset;
and this should go to local scope
Quoted 8 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +3
-5-int num_stripes; -int min_stripes; -int sub_stripes; -int min_devices;/* the min number of devices we need */ -int i; +int num_stripes;/* total number of stripes to allocate */ +int sub_stripes;/* sub_stripes info for map */ +int dev_stripes;/* stripes per dev */
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2319
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +8
-0+int devs_max;/* max devs to use */ +int devs_min;/* min devs needed */ +int devs_increment;/* ndevs has to be a multiple of this */ +int ncopies;/* how many copies to data has */ int ret; +u64 max_stripe_size; +u64 max_chunk_size; +u64 stripe_size; +int ndevs;int index;
^^^^^
remove, unused or can be substituted with existing var (i)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2327
Quoted 8 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +2
-0+int i; +int j;if ((type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 ) && (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) {WARN_ON (1 ); type &= ~BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ; }
comment please, why this combination is bad
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2328
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +1
-0+
(extra newline)
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +3
-4if (list_empty (&fs_devices->alloc_list))return -ENOSPC ; - ret =__btrfs_calc_nstripes (fs_devices, type, &num_stripes, - &min_stripes, &sub_stripes); -if (ret) -return ret; + + sub_stripes =1 ; + dev_stripes =1 ;
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2344
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +10
-0+ devs_increment =1 ; + ncopies =1 ; + devs_max =0 ;/* 0 == as many as possible */ + devs_min =1 ; + +/* +* define the properties of each RAID type. +* FIXME: move this to a global table and use it in all RAID +* calculation code +*/
agreed with the FIXME, Hugo Mills' balance patches have the refactoring code, so let's keep this as-is for now
Quoted 21 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +21
-0+if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP )) { + dev_stripes =2 ; + ncopies =2 ; + devs_max =1 ; + }else if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 )) { + devs_min =2 ; + }else if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 )) { + devs_increment =2 ; + ncopies =2 ; + devs_max =2 ; + devs_min =2 ; + }else if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) { + sub_stripes =2 ; + devs_increment =2 ; + ncopies =2 ; + devs_min =4 ; + }else { + devs_max =1 ; + } + +if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA ) {
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2375
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +10
-0+ max_stripe_size =1024 *1024 *1024 ; + max_chunk_size =10 * max_stripe_size; + }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA ) { + max_stripe_size =256 *1024 *1024 ; + max_chunk_size = max_stripe_size; + }else if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM ) { + max_stripe_size =8 *1024 *1024 ; + max_chunk_size =2 * max_stripe_size; + }else { +BUG_ON (1 );
a printk would be good, this may catch a bug eg. in alloc_profile bit handling
Quoted 32 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +5
-19+ } + +/* we don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writeable space */ + max_chunk_size =min (div_factor (fs_devices->total_rw_bytes,1 ), + max_chunk_size); devices_info =kzalloc (sizeof (*devices_info) * fs_devices->rw_devices,GFP_NOFS );if (!devices_info)return -ENOMEM ; - map =kmalloc (map_lookup_size (num_stripes),GFP_NOFS ); -if (!map) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto error; - } - map->num_stripes = num_stripes; - cur = fs_devices->alloc_list.next; - index =0 ; - i =0 ; - calc_size =__btrfs_calc_stripe_size (fs_devices, calc_size, type, - num_stripes,0 ); - -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) { - min_free = calc_size *2 ; - min_devices =1 ; - }else { - min_free = calc_size; - min_devices = min_stripes; - }
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2395
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +6
-3- -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&private_devs); -while (index < num_stripes) { +/* +* in the first pass through the devices list, we gather information +* about the available holes on each device. +*/ + ndevs =0 ; +while (cur != &fs_devices->alloc_list) { device = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_alloc_list);
^^^^^^
declare locally, and add max_avail and total_avail
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2396
Quoted 1 line
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-0BUG_ON (!device->writeable);
not a newly added BUG_ON, but I wonder if this is the best what can be done here, a printk would be helpful too.
I do not see any locking of the device list here, and did not have a deeper look, but I think this could race with device removal, when the device is still in the list, but the racing thread managed to set device->writable to zero. In this case, a WARN would do, and skipping the device will not break things (too much).
Quoted 113 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +53
-57+ + cur = cur->next; + +if (!device->in_fs_metadata) +continue ; +if (device->total_bytes > device->bytes_used) - avail = device->total_bytes - device->bytes_used; + total_avail = device->total_bytes - device->bytes_used;else - avail =0 ; - cur = cur->next; - -if (device->in_fs_metadata && avail >= min_free) { - ret =find_free_dev_extent (trans, device, min_free, - &devices_info[i].dev_offset, - &devices_info[i].max_avail); -if (ret ==0 ) { -list_move_tail (&device->dev_alloc_list, - &private_devs); - map->stripes[index].dev = device; - map->stripes[index].physical = - devices_info[i].dev_offset; - index++; -if (type &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) { - map->stripes[index].dev = device; - map->stripes[index].physical = - devices_info[i].dev_offset + - calc_size; - index++; - } - }else if (ret != -ENOSPC ) - goto error; - - devices_info[i].dev = device; - i++; - }else if (device->in_fs_metadata && - avail >=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ) { - devices_info[i].dev = device; - devices_info[i].max_avail = avail; - i++; - } - -if (cur == &fs_devices->alloc_list) -break ; - } - -list_splice (&private_devs, &fs_devices->alloc_list); -if (index < num_stripes) { -if (index >= min_stripes) { - num_stripes = index; -if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 )) { - num_stripes /= sub_stripes; - num_stripes *= sub_stripes; - } - - map =__shrink_map_lookup_stripes (map, num_stripes); - }else if (i >= min_devices) { - ret =__btrfs_alloc_tiny_space (trans, fs_devices, - devices_info, i, type, - &map, min_stripes, - &calc_size); -if (ret) - goto error; - }else { - ret = -ENOSPC ; + total_avail =0 ; +/* avail is off by max(alloc_start, 1MB), but that is the same +* for all devices, so it doesn't hurt the sorting later on +*/ + + ret =find_free_dev_extent (trans, device, + max_stripe_size * dev_stripes, + &dev_offset, &max_avail); +if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC ) goto error; + +if (ret ==0 ) + max_avail = max_stripe_size * dev_stripes; + +if (max_avail <BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN * dev_stripes) +continue ; + + devices_info[ndevs].dev_offset = dev_offset; + devices_info[ndevs].max_avail = max_avail; + devices_info[ndevs].total_avail = total_avail; + devices_info[ndevs].dev = device; + ++ndevs; + } + +/* +* now sort the devices by hole size / available space +*/ +sort (devices_info, ndevs,sizeof (struct btrfs_device_info ), + btrfs_cmp_device_info,NULL ); + +/* round down to number of usable stripes */ + ndevs -= ndevs % devs_increment; + +if (ndevs < devs_increment * sub_stripes || ndevs < devs_min) { + ret = -ENOSPC ; + goto error; + } + +if (devs_max && ndevs > devs_max) + ndevs = devs_max; +/* +* the primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as many +* devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. +*/ + stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1 ].max_avail; + num_stripes = ndevs * dev_stripes; +
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2462
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +10
-0+if (stripe_size * num_stripes > max_chunk_size * ncopies) { + stripe_size = max_chunk_size * ncopies; +do_div (stripe_size, num_stripes); + } + +do_div (stripe_size, dev_stripes); +do_div (stripe_size,BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ); + stripe_size *=BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN ; + +BUG_ON (!stripe_size);
what does this catch, in words? stripe_size was smaller than BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN. Old code made sure that this does not happen, doing
calc_size = max_t(u64, calc_size, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN)
before the final do_div. Is there really a reason to crash?
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2471
Quoted 9 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +9
-0+ + map =kmalloc (map_lookup_size (num_stripes),GFP_NOFS ); +if (!map) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto error; + } + map->num_stripes = num_stripes; + + index =0 ;
not used, probably intended as a linear counter of the 'int s = ... ' expression below. the compiler 'strength-reduce' pass will probably deduce this too.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_add_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2479
Quoted 8 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +6
-0+for (i =0 ; i < ndevs; ++i) { +for (j =0 ; j < dev_stripes; ++j) { +int s = i * dev_stripes + j; + map->stripes[s].dev = devices_info[i].dev; + map->stripes[s].physical = devices_info[i].dev_offset + + j * stripe_size; } }
not really an issue here, but the devices_info[i] could be moved out of the for( j ) loop (assigned to a tmp var), but an optimizing compiler will do this too :)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2491
Quoted 12 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +2
-3map->sector_size = extent_root->sectorsize;@@ -2621,9 +2485,8 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, map->sub_stripes = sub_stripes; *map_ret = map; - *stripe_size = calc_size; - *num_bytes =chunk_bytes_by_type (type, calc_size, - map->num_stripes, sub_stripes); + *stripe_size_out = stripe_size; + *num_bytes = stripe_size * (num_stripes / ncopies);trace_btrfs_chunk_alloc (info->chunk_root, map, start, *num_bytes);
...
[inserted from patched file]
2482 index = 0;
2483 while (index < map->num_stripes) {
2484 device = map->stripes[index].dev;
2485 dev_offset = map->stripes[index].physical;
2486
2487 ret = btrfs_alloc_dev_extent(trans, device,
2488 info->chunk_root->root_key.objectid, 2489 BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID, 2490 start, dev_offset, stripe_size);
2491 BUG_ON(ret);
2492 index++;
2493 }
can you please transform this to a for loop for me? I know this is not your original code, but this cleanup seems worth while changing the whole function.
(and make those device and def_offset local declarations)
Quoted 11 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +1
-1@@ -2658,7 +2521,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret =btrfs_alloc_dev_extent (trans, device, info->chunk_root->root_key.objectid,BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID , - start, dev_offset, calc_size); + start, dev_offset, stripe_size);BUG_ON (ret); index++; }
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, · line 2535
Quoted 7 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +2
-1@@ -2667,8 +2530,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,return 0 ; error: +kfree (devices_info);kfree (map); -kfree (devices_info); +
unnecessary hunk
Quoted 9 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-0return ret; }fs/btrfs/volumes.h +0
-0
fs/btrfs/volumes.h struct btrfs_device_info { · line 150
Quoted 7 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.h +1
-0@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct btrfs_device_info {struct btrfs_device *dev;u64 dev_offset;u64 max_avail; +u64 total_avail; };struct map_lookup {
and I'm going to test this a bit too :)
david