CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
Subsystems (2)
Viresh Kumar
maintainerv3 cover CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
This is targetted for 3.10-rc1 or linux-next just after the merge window.
All patches are pushed here for others to apply:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.
Governors directory in sysfs is created at /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of a governor_type in the system.
This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
This patchset is inclined towards fixing this issue. Now we will create governors directory in cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/<gov> for platforms which have multiple struct policy alive at any moment. For others the interface is kept same:
cpu/cpufreq/<gov>.
@Rafael: Clearly, I don't want to have following patch: "cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies" and added it because of comment from Borislov against which nobody else replied :)
So, please drop it if you agree over my comments with earlier version.
V2->V3:
- Fixed value of CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT in the correct patch
- Drop indentation fixes from intel_pstate.c
V1->V2:
- Few patches from V1 are already picked up by Rafael for 3.9-rc1
- Last two patches are new
- Added dbs_data->exit() routines to free up memory used for struct tuners.
Viresh Kumar (4):
cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure
cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
cpufreq: Get rid of "struct global_attr"
cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 + drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 +- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 27 +++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 148 +++++++++++++--------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 159 ++++++++++++++---------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 43 +++++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 20 +-- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 44 ++++--- 9 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 272 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH v3 1/4 cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure
Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.
Governors directory in sysfs is created at /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of a governor_type in the system.
This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
This patch is inclined towards providing this infrastructure. Because we are required to allocate governor's resources dynamically now, we must do it at policy creation and end. And so got CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT/EXIT.
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +18 -3
@@ -1070,6 +1070,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */ if (cpus ==1 ) { +__cpufreq_governor (data,CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT ); +lock_policy_rwsem_read (cpu); kobj = &data->kobj; cmp = &data->kobj_unregister;
@@ -1651,7 +1653,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);static int __cpufreq_set_policy (struct cpufreq_policy *data,struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { -int ret =0 ; +int ret =0 , failed =1 ;pr_debug ("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n" , policy->cpu, policy->min, policy->max);
@@ -1705,18 +1707,31 @@ static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *data,pr_debug ("governor switch\n" );/* end old governor */ -if (data->governor) +if (data->governor) {__cpufreq_governor (data,CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP ); +__cpufreq_governor (data, +CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT ); + }/* start new governor */ data->governor = policy->governor; -if (__cpufreq_governor (data,CPUFREQ_GOV_START )) { +if (!__cpufreq_governor (data,CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT )) { +if (!__cpufreq_governor (data,CPUFREQ_GOV_START )) + failed =0 ; +else +__cpufreq_governor (data, +CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT ); + } + +if (failed) {/* new governor failed, so re-start old one */ pr_debug ("starting governor %s failed\n" , data->governor->name);if (old_gov) { data->governor = old_gov;__cpufreq_governor (data, +CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT ); +__cpufreq_governor (data,CPUFREQ_GOV_START ); } ret = -EINVAL ;
include/linux/cpufreq.h +6 -3
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {* governors are used */ unsigned int policy;/* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor;/* see below */ +void *governor_data;struct work_struct update;/* if update_policy() needs to be * called, but you're in IRQ context */
@@ -178,9 +179,11 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div, u_int mu* CPUFREQ GOVERNORS * *********************************************************************/ -#define CPUFREQ_GOV_START 1 -#define CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP 2 -#define CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS 3 +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_START 1 +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP 2 +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS 3 +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT 4 +#define CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT 5struct cpufreq_governor {char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN ];
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH v3 2/4 cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
In reply to Viresh KumarCurrently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.
Governors directory in sysfs is created at /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of a governor_type in the system.
This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
This patch uses the infrastructure provided by earlier patch and implements init/exit routines for ondemand and conservative governors.
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 - drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 148 +++++++++++++--------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 159 ++++++++++++++---------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 43 +++++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 15 ++- 6 files changed, 352 insertions(+), 235 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +0 -6
@@ -1546,11 +1546,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, policy->cpu, event); ret = policy->governor->governor (policy, event); -if (event ==CPUFREQ_GOV_START ) - policy->governor->initialized++; -else if (event ==CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP ) - policy->governor->initialized--; -/* we keep one module reference alive for each CPU governed by this CPU */ if ((event !=CPUFREQ_GOV_START ) || ret)
@@ -1574,7 +1569,6 @@ int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)mutex_lock (&cpufreq_governor_mutex); - governor->initialized =0 ; err = -EBUSY ;if (__find_governor (governor->name) ==NULL ) { err =0 ;
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +89 -59
317 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +93 -66
277 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h +30 -13
87 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +126 -90
448 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/cpufreq.h +14 -1
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {unsigned int policy;/* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor;/* see below */ void *governor_data; +/* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple +* clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs +* directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ +* directory */ +bool have_multiple_policies;struct work_struct update;/* if update_policy() needs to be * called, but you're in IRQ context */
@@ -134,6 +139,15 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)return cpumask_weight (policy->cpus) >1 ; } +static inline struct kobject * +get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +if (policy->have_multiple_policies) +return &policy->kobj; +else +return cpufreq_global_kobject; +} +/******************** cpufreq transition notifiers *******************/ #define CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE (0)
@@ -187,7 +201,6 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div, u_int mustruct cpufreq_governor {char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN ]; -int initialized;int (*governor) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int event); ssize_t (*show_setspeed) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 9 lines · Viresh Kumar
Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single
governor_type. If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.Governors directory in sysfs is created at
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of agovernor_typein the system.
Quoted 7 lines
This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
This patch uses the infrastructure provided by earlier patch and implements init/exit routines for ondemand and conservative governors.
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
As discussed in other patch thread, i dropped "cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies" patch and following is the fixup to this patch:
I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
commit f02fca9a2478088c4f7dadf82d998ae007a56285
Author: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Date: Wed Mar 20 10:50:33 2013 +0530
fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 22 ++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +8 -0
@@ -128,6 +128,14 @@ void disable_cpufreq(void)static LIST_HEAD (cpufreq_governor_list);static DEFINE_MUTEX (cpufreq_governor_mutex); +struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +if (cpufreq_driver->have_multiple_policies) +return &policy->kobj; +else +return cpufreq_global_kobject; +} +static struct cpufreq_policy *__cpufreq_cpu_get (unsigned int cpu,bool sysfs) {struct cpufreq_policy *data;
include/linux/cpufreq.h +0 -5
@@ -107,11 +107,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {unsigned int policy;/* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor;/* see below */ void *governor_data; -/* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple -* clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs -* directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ -* directory */ -bool have_multiple_policies;struct work_struct update;/* if update_policy() needs to be * called, but you're in IRQ context */
@@ -139,15 +134,6 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
return cpumask_weight(policy->cpus) > 1;
}
-static inline struct kobject * -get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- if (policy->have_multiple_policies)
- return &policy->kobj;
- else
- return cpufreq_global_kobject;
-}
-
/******************** cpufreq transition notifiers *******************/
#define CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE (0)
@@ -245,6 +231,13 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
struct module *owner;
char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
u8 flags;
+ /*
+ * This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple
+ * clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs
+ * directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/
+ * directory
+ */+ bool have_multiple_policies;
/* needed by all drivers */
int (*init) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy);@@ -329,6 +322,7 @@ const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);
*********************************************************************/
int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu); int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
+struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
/* query the current CPU frequency (in kHz). If zero, cpufreq
couldn't detect it */
Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 18 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 9 lines · Viresh Kumar
Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single
governor_type. If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.Governors directory in sysfs is created at
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of agovernor_typein the system.Quoted 7 lines
This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
This patch uses the infrastructure provided by earlier patch and implements init/exit routines for ondemand and conservative governors.
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
As discussed in other patch thread, i dropped "cpufreq: Add
Kconfigoption to enable/disablehave_multiple_policies" patch and following is the fixup to this patch:I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
OK, applied these to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
At the moment bleeding-edge and linux-next diverged slightly on cpufreq, but I hope the bleeding-edge material won't cause build problems to occur, so I'll be able to move it to linux-next shortly.
Quoted 5 lines
commit
f02fca9a2478088c4f7dadf82d998ae007a56285Author: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Date: Wed Mar 20 10:50:33 2013 +0530fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
I'd actually prefer you to post complete updated patches instead of these fixups. They are real PITA for me and probably for everybody else trying to follow the cpufreq development recently.
Thanks,
Rafael
Quoted 84 lines
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 22 ++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +8
-0@@ -128,6 +128,14 @@ void disable_cpufreq(void)static LIST_HEAD (cpufreq_governor_list);static DEFINE_MUTEX (cpufreq_governor_mutex); +struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +if (cpufreq_driver->have_multiple_policies) +return &policy->kobj; +else +return cpufreq_global_kobject; +} +static struct cpufreq_policy *__cpufreq_cpu_get (unsigned int cpu,bool sysfs) {struct cpufreq_policy *data;include/linux/cpufreq.h +0
-14@@ -107,11 +107,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {unsigned int policy;/* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor;/* see below */ void *governor_data; -/* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple -* clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs -* directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ -* directory */ -bool have_multiple_policies;struct work_struct update;/* if update_policy() needs to be * called, but you're in IRQ context */ @@ -139,15 +134,6 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)return cpumask_weight (policy->cpus) >1 ; } -static inline struct kobject * -get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ -if (policy->have_multiple_policies) -return &policy->kobj; -else -return cpufreq_global_kobject; -} -/******************** cpufreq transition notifiers *******************/ #define
CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE(0)include/linux/cpufreq.h +8
-0@@ -245,6 +231,13 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {struct module *owner;char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN ];u8 flags; +/* +* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple +* clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs +* directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ +* directory +*/ +bool have_multiple_policies;/* needed by all drivers */ int (*init) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy);@@ -329,6 +322,7 @@ const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);*********************************************************************/ int cpufreq_get_policy (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int cpu);int cpufreq_update_policy (unsigned int cpu); +struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy);#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ /* query the current CPU frequency (in kHz). If zero, cpufreq couldn't detect it */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 7 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 3 lines · Viresh Kumar
I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
OK, applied these to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
Thanks.
Quoted 3 lines
At the moment bleeding-edge and linux-next diverged slightly on cpufreq, but I hope the bleeding-edge material won't cause build problems to occur, so I'll be able to move it to linux-next shortly.
There shouldn't be any build problems not because i have done all build testing properly BUT because my tree is under continuously surveillance by Fengguang's bot. And any problem with my branches is reported very early :)
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
commit
f02fca9a2478088c4f7dadf82d998ae007a56285Author: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Date: Wed Mar 20 10:50:33 2013 +0530fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
I'd actually prefer you to post complete updated patches instead of these fixups. They are real PITA for me and probably for everybody else trying to follow the cpufreq development recently.
Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still believe that's
true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to review whole patch again. BUT people who are looking for complete patches to apply would be annoyed by this and hence i always show them path of my repo where they can find it. So, what i may do is, post fixups and then resend patches. So that reviewer knows what changed and others can have complete patches too.
--
viresh
Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 25 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 7 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 3 lines · Viresh Kumar
I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
OK, applied these to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
Thanks.
Quoted 3 lines
At the moment bleeding-edge and linux-next diverged slightly on cpufreq, but I hope the bleeding-edge material won't cause build problems to occur, so I'll be able to move it to linux-next shortly.
There shouldn't be any build problems not because i have done all build testing properly BUT because my tree is under continuously surveillance by Fengguang's bot. And any problem with my branches is reported very early :)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
commit
f02fca9a2478088c4f7dadf82d998ae007a56285Author: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Date: Wed Mar 20 10:50:33 2013 +0530fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I'd actually prefer you to post complete updated patches instead of these fixups. They are real PITA for me and probably for everybody else trying to follow the cpufreq development recently.
Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still believe that's
true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to review whole patch again.
They won't have to if you write in the preamble what the differences from previous versions are.
Quoted 3 lines
BUT people who are looking for complete patches to apply would be annoyed by this and hence i always show them path of my repo where they can find it.
The problem with this approach is that the complete patches never make it to the mailing lists and people have problems with connecting commits to previously posted patches.
Moreover, it is *much* more convenient to me to take patches from kernel.org patchwork than from your repos, with all due respect.
Quoted 3 lines
So, what i may do is, post fixups and then resend
patches. So that reviewer knows what changed and others can have complete patches too.
Sure, that will work too.
Thanks,
Rafael
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 9 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 4 lines · Viresh Kumar
Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still believe that's
true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to review whole patch again.They won't have to if you write in the preamble what the differences from previous versions are.
You didn't get me.. How will the reviewer check if author has done what he is saying in preamble and he hasn't broken anything new?
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 3 lines
BUT people who are looking for complete patches to apply would be annoyed by this and hence i always show them path of my repo where they can find it.
The problem with this approach is that the complete patches never make it to the mailing lists and people have problems with connecting commits to previously posted patches.
Moreover, it is *much* more convenient to me to take patches from kernel.org patchwork than from your repos, with all due respect.
I understand.. I push them to repo only when they are broken, otherwise not.
Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 8 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 7 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 4 lines · Viresh Kumar
Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still believe that's
true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to review whole patch again.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
They won't have to if you write in the preamble what the differences from previous versions are.
You didn't get me.. How will the reviewer check if author has done what he is saying in preamble and he hasn't broken anything new?
Well, if the submitter wants to cheat, she/he certainly can this way, but what's the benefit, honestly? If the reviewer actually notices that there are more differences than the submitter admits to, the consequences may be quite unpleasant for the submitter (like the rejection of any future patches, for example). And mistakes are possible anyway (and the more patches you deal with, the greater the chances of making a mistake are).
Thanks.
Rafael
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 6 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Well, if the submitter wants to cheat, she/he certainly can this way, but what's the benefit, honestly? If the reviewer actually notices that there are more differences than the submitter admits to, the consequences may be quite unpleasant for the submitter (like the rejection of any future patches, for example). And mistakes are possible anyway (and the more patches you deal with, the greater the chances of making a mistake are).
Agreed.. I was focusing on the last part: mistakes.. People learn over time and can still commit mistakes.. So a diff is always better to see what changed.
Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
In reply to Rafael J. WysockiQuoted 23 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 22 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 9 lines · Viresh Kumar
Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single
governor_type. If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.Governors directory in sysfs is created at
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of agovernor_typein the system.Quoted 7 lines
This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
This patch uses the infrastructure provided by earlier patch and implements init/exit routines for ondemand and conservative governors.
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>As discussed in other patch thread, i dropped "cpufreq: Add
Kconfigoption to enable/disablehave_multiple_policies" patch and following is the fixup to this patch:
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
OK, applied these to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
Hi, latest bleeding-edge is spewing this out on boot:
[ 3.585157] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.592227] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100() [ 3.599521] Hardware name: Dinar [ 3.606878] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand' [ 3.614634] Modules linked in: [ 3.622382] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc4+ #7 [ 3.630305] Call Trace: [ 3.638251] [<ffffffff810589cf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 3.646435] [<ffffffff81058ac6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [ 3.654586] [<ffffffff8133e2f0>] ? strlcat+0x60/0x80 [ 3.662765] [<ffffffff811fe7d8>] sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100 [ 3.670977] [<ffffffff811fe9cc>] create_dir+0x7c/0xd0 [ 3.679239] [<ffffffff811fecaf>] sysfs_create_subdir+0x1f/0x30 [ 3.687601] [<ffffffff812006c4>] internal_create_group+0x64/0x210 [ 3.696098] [<ffffffff812008a3>] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [ 3.704700] [<ffffffff816bf800>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x400/0x590 [ 3.713401] [<ffffffff816bdc37>] od_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 3.722191] [<ffffffff816bb437>] __cpufreq_governor+0x47/0xc0 [ 3.731071] [<ffffffff816bb94d>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x19d/0x1b0 [ 3.739968] [<ffffffff816bca89>] cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x259/0x2b0 [ 3.748960] [<ffffffff813cdce6>] ? acpi_processor_get_performance_info+0x21c/0x452 [ 3.758099] [<ffffffff816bc210>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130 [ 3.767366] [<ffffffff816bce90>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x3b0/0x4d0 [ 3.776659] [<ffffffff821579d4>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12 [ 3.785985] [<ffffffff814e6a39>] subsys_interface_register+0x89/0xd0 [ 3.795452] [<ffffffff816baf5e>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x8e/0x180 [ 3.804919] [<ffffffff82157aca>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0xf6/0x1f8 [ 3.814360] [<ffffffff814f5030>] ? set_trace_device+0x80/0x80 [ 3.823558] [<ffffffff8100206f>] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170 [ 3.832476] [<ffffffff8211b00a>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1cd [ 3.841131] [<ffffffff8211a88e>] ? do_early_param+0x86/0x86 [ 3.849506] [<ffffffff817f4c20>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 3.857557] [<ffffffff817f4c2e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 3.865260] [<ffffffff8181edec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 3.872886] [<ffffffff817f4c20>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 3.880456] ---[ end trace 1a5c6247c6d9b0ac ]--- [ 3.888201] ------------[ cut here ]------------
This warning is repeated for number of cpus - 1 times.
And when I do:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold
[ 489.103388] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [ 489.112064] IP: [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.120511] PGD a285e6067 PUD a27085067 PMD 0 [ 489.128690] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 489.136521] Modules linked in: [ 489.144134] CPU 15 [ 489.144229] Pid: 1565, comm: cat Tainted: G W 3.9.0-rc4+ #7 AMD Dinar/Dinar [ 489.159654] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff816be02c>] [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.167864] RSP: 0018:ffff880423859e88 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 489.176043] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880a271188c0 RCX: ffffffff81a41810 [ 489.184372] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81e02dae RDI: ffffffff820d7860 [ 489.184373] RBP: ffff880423859e88 R08: ffffea0028b6df80 R09: 00000000001f05b8 [ 489.184374] R10: 0000000000001b97 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffff880423859f50 [ 489.184374] R13: 0000000000008000 R14: ffff880a271188a0 R15: ffff8804251aa070 [ 489.184377] FS: 00007f3278b31700(0000) GS:ffff880a2fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 489.184378] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 489.184378] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000a2db82000 CR4: 00000000000407e0 [ 489.184380] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 489.184381] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 489.184382] Process cat (pid: 1565, threadinfo ffff880423858000, task ffff880424805c00) [ 489.184382] Stack: [ 489.184389] ffff880423859e98 ffffffff8133814f ffff880423859ef8 ffffffff811fd62a [ 489.184394] 000000002bf67be2 ffff8808260b7a80 ffffffff81a41810 00000000012c8000 [ 489.184399] ffff880423859ef8 0000000000008000 00000000012c8000 ffff880423859f50 [ 489.184400] Call Trace: [ 489.184406] [<ffffffff8133814f>] kobj_attr_show+0xf/0x30 [ 489.184411] [<ffffffff811fd62a>] sysfs_read_file+0xaa/0x190 [ 489.184415] [<ffffffff81187e30>] vfs_read+0xb0/0x180 [ 489.184418] [<ffffffff81187f52>] sys_read+0x52/0xa0 [ 489.184422] [<ffffffff8181a7fe>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10 [ 489.184426] [<ffffffff8181ee99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 489.184441] Code: 52 08 e8 78 2c c8 ff 5d 48 98 c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 66 66 66 90 55 48 8b 57 70 48 89 f0 48 89 c7 48 c7 c6 ae 2d e0 81 31 c0 48 89 e5 <48> 8b 52 10 8b 52 0c e8 48 2c c8 ff 5d 48 98 c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 [ 489.184443] RIP [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.184443] RSP <ffff880423859e88> [ 489.184444] CR2: 0000000000000010 [ 489.184507] ---[ end trace 1a5c6247c6d9b0c3 ]---
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 83 lines · Jacob Shin
Hi, latest bleeding-edge is spewing this out on boot:
[ 3.585157] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.592227] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100() [ 3.599521] Hardware name: Dinar [ 3.606878] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand' [ 3.614634] Modules linked in: [ 3.622382] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc4+ #7 [ 3.630305] Call Trace: [ 3.638251] [<ffffffff810589cf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 3.646435] [<ffffffff81058ac6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [ 3.654586] [<ffffffff8133e2f0>] ? strlcat+0x60/0x80 [ 3.662765] [<ffffffff811fe7d8>] sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100 [ 3.670977] [<ffffffff811fe9cc>] create_dir+0x7c/0xd0 [ 3.679239] [<ffffffff811fecaf>] sysfs_create_subdir+0x1f/0x30 [ 3.687601] [<ffffffff812006c4>] internal_create_group+0x64/0x210 [ 3.696098] [<ffffffff812008a3>] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [ 3.704700] [<ffffffff816bf800>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x400/0x590 [ 3.713401] [<ffffffff816bdc37>] od_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 3.722191] [<ffffffff816bb437>] __cpufreq_governor+0x47/0xc0 [ 3.731071] [<ffffffff816bb94d>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x19d/0x1b0 [ 3.739968] [<ffffffff816bca89>] cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x259/0x2b0 [ 3.748960] [<ffffffff813cdce6>] ? acpi_processor_get_performance_info+0x21c/0x452 [ 3.758099] [<ffffffff816bc210>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130 [ 3.767366] [<ffffffff816bce90>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x3b0/0x4d0 [ 3.776659] [<ffffffff821579d4>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12 [ 3.785985] [<ffffffff814e6a39>] subsys_interface_register+0x89/0xd0 [ 3.795452] [<ffffffff816baf5e>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x8e/0x180 [ 3.804919] [<ffffffff82157aca>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0xf6/0x1f8 [ 3.814360] [<ffffffff814f5030>] ? set_trace_device+0x80/0x80 [ 3.823558] [<ffffffff8100206f>] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170 [ 3.832476] [<ffffffff8211b00a>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1cd [ 3.841131] [<ffffffff8211a88e>] ? do_early_param+0x86/0x86 [ 3.849506] [<ffffffff817f4c20>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 3.857557] [<ffffffff817f4c2e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 3.865260] [<ffffffff8181edec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 3.872886] [<ffffffff817f4c20>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 3.880456] ---[ end trace 1a5c6247c6d9b0ac ]--- [ 3.888201] ------------[ cut here ]------------This warning is repeated for number of cpus - 1 times.
And when I do:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold[ 489.103388] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [ 489.112064] IP: [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.120511] PGD a285e6067 PUD a27085067 PMD 0 [ 489.128690] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 489.136521] Modules linked in: [ 489.144134] CPU 15 [ 489.144229] Pid: 1565, comm: cat Tainted: G W 3.9.0-rc4+ #7 AMD Dinar/Dinar [ 489.159654] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff816be02c>] [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.167864] RSP: 0018:ffff880423859e88 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 489.176043] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880a271188c0 RCX: ffffffff81a41810 [ 489.184372] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81e02dae RDI: ffffffff820d7860 [ 489.184373] RBP: ffff880423859e88 R08: ffffea0028b6df80 R09: 00000000001f05b8 [ 489.184374] R10: 0000000000001b97 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffff880423859f50 [ 489.184374] R13: 0000000000008000 R14: ffff880a271188a0 R15: ffff8804251aa070 [ 489.184377] FS: 00007f3278b31700(0000) GS:ffff880a2fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 489.184378] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 489.184378] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000a2db82000 CR4: 00000000000407e0 [ 489.184380] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 489.184381] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 489.184382] Process cat (pid: 1565, threadinfo ffff880423858000, task ffff880424805c00) [ 489.184382] Stack: [ 489.184389] ffff880423859e98 ffffffff8133814f ffff880423859ef8 ffffffff811fd62a [ 489.184394] 000000002bf67be2 ffff8808260b7a80 ffffffff81a41810 00000000012c8000 [ 489.184399] ffff880423859ef8 0000000000008000 00000000012c8000 ffff880423859f50 [ 489.184400] Call Trace: [ 489.184406] [<ffffffff8133814f>] kobj_attr_show+0xf/0x30 [ 489.184411] [<ffffffff811fd62a>] sysfs_read_file+0xaa/0x190 [ 489.184415] [<ffffffff81187e30>] vfs_read+0xb0/0x180 [ 489.184418] [<ffffffff81187f52>] sys_read+0x52/0xa0 [ 489.184422] [<ffffffff8181a7fe>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10 [ 489.184426] [<ffffffff8181ee99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 489.184441] Code: 52 08 e8 78 2c c8 ff 5d 48 98 c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 66 66 66 90 55 48 8b 57 70 48 89 f0 48 89 c7 48 c7 c6 ae 2d e0 81 31 c0 48 89 e5 <48> 8b 52 10 8b 52 0c e8 48 2c c8 ff 5d 48 98 c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 [ 489.184443] RIP [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.184443] RSP <ffff880423859e88> [ 489.184444] CR2: 0000000000000010 [ 489.184507] ---[ end trace 1a5c6247c6d9b0c3 ]---
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas?
Yes, i believe i have enough idea about it :)
There are two kind of systems i know:
1 - Single group of cpus controlled by a single clock line,
i.e. only one policy instance at any time
2 - multipolicy systems where we have more than one group of cpus
and every group have one clock line.
For the second case also there are two cases:
2.1 - support have_multiple_policies (i.e. have separate instance of governor
for each policy struct)
2.2 - doesn't support have_multiple_policies
The last one (2.2) is broken with my patch and attached is the fix. I have tested
it on my Lenovo Thinkpad which is more like 2.2 case.
cat of cpufreq/ondemand/** is still broken and i am too tired of fixing it now...
Its already midnight here 01:01 AM.
--
viresh
From c95ca544325f40f55858e02526d0bd6a1740480d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <c95ca544325f40f55858e02526d0bd6a1740480d.1364322587.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:20:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of
governors
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +13 -0
@@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)return cpufreq_global_kobject; } +bool have_multiple_policies (void ) +{ +return cpufreq_driver->have_multiple_policies; +} +static struct cpufreq_policy *__cpufreq_cpu_get (unsigned int cpu,bool sysfs) {struct cpufreq_policy *data;
@@ -1561,6 +1566,13 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, policy->cpu, event); ret = policy->governor->governor (policy, event); +if (!ret) { +if (event ==CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT ) + policy->governor->initialized++; +else if (event ==CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT ) + policy->governor->initialized--; + } +/* we keep one module reference alive for each CPU governed by this CPU */ if ((event !=CPUFREQ_GOV_START ) || ret)
@@ -1584,6 +1596,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)mutex_lock (&cpufreq_governor_mutex); + governor->initialized =0 ; err = -EBUSY ;if (__find_governor (governor->name) ==NULL ) { err =0 ;
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +53 -21
136 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/cpufreq.h +2 -0
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div, u_int mustruct cpufreq_governor {char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN ]; +int initialized;int (*governor) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int event); ssize_t (*show_setspeed) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -323,6 +324,7 @@ const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);int cpufreq_get_policy (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int cpu);int cpufreq_update_policy (unsigned int cpu);struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy); +bool have_multiple_policies (void );#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ /* query the current CPU frequency (in kHz). If zero, cpufreq couldn't detect it */
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 115 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 83 lines · Jacob Shin
Hi, latest bleeding-edge is spewing this out on boot:
[ 3.585157] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.592227] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100() [ 3.599521] Hardware name: Dinar [ 3.606878] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand' [ 3.614634] Modules linked in: [ 3.622382] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc4+ #7 [ 3.630305] Call Trace: [ 3.638251] [<ffffffff810589cf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 3.646435] [<ffffffff81058ac6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [ 3.654586] [<ffffffff8133e2f0>] ? strlcat+0x60/0x80 [ 3.662765] [<ffffffff811fe7d8>] sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100 [ 3.670977] [<ffffffff811fe9cc>] create_dir+0x7c/0xd0 [ 3.679239] [<ffffffff811fecaf>] sysfs_create_subdir+0x1f/0x30 [ 3.687601] [<ffffffff812006c4>] internal_create_group+0x64/0x210 [ 3.696098] [<ffffffff812008a3>] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [ 3.704700] [<ffffffff816bf800>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x400/0x590 [ 3.713401] [<ffffffff816bdc37>] od_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 3.722191] [<ffffffff816bb437>] __cpufreq_governor+0x47/0xc0 [ 3.731071] [<ffffffff816bb94d>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x19d/0x1b0 [ 3.739968] [<ffffffff816bca89>] cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x259/0x2b0 [ 3.748960] [<ffffffff813cdce6>] ? acpi_processor_get_performance_info+0x21c/0x452 [ 3.758099] [<ffffffff816bc210>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130 [ 3.767366] [<ffffffff816bce90>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x3b0/0x4d0 [ 3.776659] [<ffffffff821579d4>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12 [ 3.785985] [<ffffffff814e6a39>] subsys_interface_register+0x89/0xd0 [ 3.795452] [<ffffffff816baf5e>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x8e/0x180 [ 3.804919] [<ffffffff82157aca>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0xf6/0x1f8 [ 3.814360] [<ffffffff814f5030>] ? set_trace_device+0x80/0x80 [ 3.823558] [<ffffffff8100206f>] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170 [ 3.832476] [<ffffffff8211b00a>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1cd [ 3.841131] [<ffffffff8211a88e>] ? do_early_param+0x86/0x86 [ 3.849506] [<ffffffff817f4c20>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 3.857557] [<ffffffff817f4c2e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 3.865260] [<ffffffff8181edec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 3.872886] [<ffffffff817f4c20>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 3.880456] ---[ end trace 1a5c6247c6d9b0ac ]--- [ 3.888201] ------------[ cut here ]------------This warning is repeated for number of cpus - 1 times.
And when I do:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold[ 489.103388] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [ 489.112064] IP: [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.120511] PGD a285e6067 PUD a27085067 PMD 0 [ 489.128690] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 489.136521] Modules linked in: [ 489.144134] CPU 15 [ 489.144229] Pid: 1565, comm: cat Tainted: G W 3.9.0-rc4+ #7 AMD Dinar/Dinar [ 489.159654] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff816be02c>] [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.167864] RSP: 0018:ffff880423859e88 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 489.176043] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880a271188c0 RCX: ffffffff81a41810 [ 489.184372] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81e02dae RDI: ffffffff820d7860 [ 489.184373] RBP: ffff880423859e88 R08: ffffea0028b6df80 R09: 00000000001f05b8 [ 489.184374] R10: 0000000000001b97 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffff880423859f50 [ 489.184374] R13: 0000000000008000 R14: ffff880a271188a0 R15: ffff8804251aa070 [ 489.184377] FS: 00007f3278b31700(0000) GS:ffff880a2fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 489.184378] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 489.184378] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000a2db82000 CR4: 00000000000407e0 [ 489.184380] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 489.184381] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 489.184382] Process cat (pid: 1565, threadinfo ffff880423858000, task ffff880424805c00) [ 489.184382] Stack: [ 489.184389] ffff880423859e98 ffffffff8133814f ffff880423859ef8 ffffffff811fd62a [ 489.184394] 000000002bf67be2 ffff8808260b7a80 ffffffff81a41810 00000000012c8000 [ 489.184399] ffff880423859ef8 0000000000008000 00000000012c8000 ffff880423859f50 [ 489.184400] Call Trace: [ 489.184406] [<ffffffff8133814f>] kobj_attr_show+0xf/0x30 [ 489.184411] [<ffffffff811fd62a>] sysfs_read_file+0xaa/0x190 [ 489.184415] [<ffffffff81187e30>] vfs_read+0xb0/0x180 [ 489.184418] [<ffffffff81187f52>] sys_read+0x52/0xa0 [ 489.184422] [<ffffffff8181a7fe>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10 [ 489.184426] [<ffffffff8181ee99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 489.184441] Code: 52 08 e8 78 2c c8 ff 5d 48 98 c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 66 66 66 90 55 48 8b 57 70 48 89 f0 48 89 c7 48 c7 c6 ae 2d e0 81 31 c0 48 89 e5 <48> 8b 52 10 8b 52 0c e8 48 2c c8 ff 5d 48 98 c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 [ 489.184443] RIP [<ffffffff816be02c>] show_up_threshold+0x1c/0x30 [ 489.184443] RSP <ffff880423859e88> [ 489.184444] CR2: 0000000000000010 [ 489.184507] ---[ end trace 1a5c6247c6d9b0c3 ]---Quoted 1 line
Any ideas?
Yes, i believe i have enough idea about it :)
There are two kind of systems i know:
1 - Single group of cpus controlled by a single clock line,
i.e. only one policy instance at any time
2 - multipolicy systems where we have more than one group of cpus
and every group have one clock line.For the second case also there are two cases:
2.1 - supporthave_multiple_policies(i.e. have separate instance of governor
for each policy struct)
2.2 - doesn't supporthave_multiple_policiesThe last one (2.2) is broken with my patch and attached is the fix. I have tested
it on my Lenovo Thinkpad which is more like 2.2 case.cat of cpufreq/ondemand/** is still broken and i am too tired of fixing it now...
Its already midnight here 01:01 AM.--
vireshdrivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +0
-0
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c line 34
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +3
-0@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@#include "cpufreq_governor.h" +/* Common data for platforms that don't need governor instance per policy */ +struct dbs_data *gdbs_data; +
Hmm .. I don't think this works for both ondemand and conservative governors running at the same time .
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 6 lines · Jacob Shin
Review
Quoted 2 lines · Viresh Kumar
(quoted diff) +2
-0+struct dbs_data *gdbs_data; +Hmm .. I don't think this works for both ondemand and conservative governors running at the same time .
Yes, this should fix it (untested for now, i will provide a complete fix today):
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index f29feb4..54ca5fc 100644
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +3 -6
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@#include "cpufreq_governor.h" -/* Common data for platforms that don't need governor instance per policy */ -struct dbs_data *gdbs_data; -static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy (unsigned int cpu,u64 *wall) {u64 idle_time;
@@ -233,7 +230,7 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,if (have_multiple_policies ()) dbs_data = policy->governor_data;else - dbs_data = gdbs_data; + dbs_data = cdata->gdbs_data;WARN_ON (!dbs_data && (event !=CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT ));
@@ -289,7 +286,7 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, }if (!have_multiple_policies ()) - gdbs_data = dbs_data; + cdata->gdbs_data = dbs_data;return 0 ;case CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT :
@@ -307,7 +304,7 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, cdata->exit (dbs_data);kfree (dbs_data); - gdbs_data =NULL ; + cdata->gdbs_data =NULL ; } policy->governor_data =NULL ;
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index 1f7de13..cc4a189 100644
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h +3 -0
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ struct common_dbs_data {int governor;struct attribute_group *attr_group; +/* Common data for platforms that don't set have_multiple_policies */ +struct dbs_data *gdbs_data; +struct cpu_dbs_common_info *(*get_cpu_cdbs)(int cpu);void *(*get_cpu_dbs_info_s)(int cpu);void (*gov_dbs_timer)(struct work_struct *work);
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 4 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 2 lines · Jacob Shin
Hmm .. I don't think this works for both ondemand and conservative governors running at the same time .
Hi Jacob,
This must be early morning for you and you must be looking for something to start with.
I am still stuck at a issue, which i am not able to fix.
- cat of */cpufreq/ondemand/** isn't showing anything on console, but all pointers are correctly set and i can see the right values with printk()
- I am able to see all prints for have_multiple_policies enabled.
- Due to this, i haven't tested any corner cases for now.
@Rafael: I will post all this as a separate patch later which you can then fold into original commit. I am just waiting for a complete fix.
Following is the work i have done until now (attached too), leave earlier fixups:
--------x-------------x------------------
From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:20:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of
governors
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 24 ++++++------ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 28 ++++++++++++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 25 ++++++------ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 + 6 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +0 -0
@@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
return cpufreq_global_kobject;
}
+bool have_multiple_policies(void)
+{
+ return cpufreq_driver->have_multiple_policies;
+}
+
static struct cpufreq_policy *__cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu, bool sysfs) {
struct cpufreq_policy *data;
@@ -1554,6 +1559,13 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
policy->cpu, event);
ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
+ if (!ret) {
+ if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT)
+ policy->governor->initialized++;
+ else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT)
+ policy->governor->initialized--;
+ }
+
/* we keep one module reference alive for
each CPU governed by this CPU */
if ((event != CPUFREQ_GOV_START) || ret)
@@ -1577,6 +1589,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
+ governor->initialized = 0;
err = -EBUSY;
if (__find_governor(governor->name) == NULL) { err = 0;
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c index 63499c8..c09d7c8 100644
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +0 -0
@@ -157,11 +157,13 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct
notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
}
/************************** sysfs interface ************************/
+static struct common_dbs_data cs_dbs_cdata; +declare_get_tuners(cs);
+
static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = cs_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -176,8 +178,8 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = NULL;
+ struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = cs_get_tuners(policy, &dbs_data); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -192,8 +194,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = cs_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -208,8 +209,7 @@ static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_down_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = cs_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ static ssize_t store_down_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = cs_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input, j;
int ret;
@@ -259,8 +258,7 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_freq_step(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = cs_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -285,7 +283,7 @@ show_one(cs, up_threshold, up_threshold);
show_one(cs, down_threshold, down_threshold); show_one(cs, ignore_nice, ignore_nice);
show_one(cs, freq_step, freq_step);
-declare_show_sampling_rate_min(); +declare_show_sampling_rate_min(cs);
cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(sampling_rate); cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(sampling_down_factor);
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index 41e5e56..54ca5fc 100644
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +50 -21
127 lines not on this page · raw message
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h index 8b18d25..fcf10d9 100644
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h +21 -2
@@ -40,13 +40,29 @@/* Ondemand Sampling types */ enum {OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE ,OD_SUB_SAMPLE }; + +#define declare_get_tuners (_gov) \ +static struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *_gov##_get_tuners \ +(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct dbs_data **ldbs_data) \ +{ \ + if (have_multiple_policies()) { \ + struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \ + if (ldbs_data) \ + *ldbs_data = dbs_data; \ + return dbs_data->tuners; \ + } else { \ + if (ldbs_data) \ + *ldbs_data = _gov##_dbs_cdata.gdbs_data; \ + return _gov##_dbs_cdata.gdbs_data->tuners; \ + } \ +} +/* Macro creating sysfs show routines */ #define show_one (_gov, file_name, object) \ static ssize_t show_##file_name \ (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) \ { \ - struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \ - struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *tuners = dbs_data->tuners; \ + struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *tuners = _gov##_get_tuners(policy, NULL); \ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", tuners->file_name); \ }
@@ -133,6 +149,9 @@ struct common_dbs_data {int governor;struct attribute_group *attr_group; +/* Common data for platforms that don't set have_multiple_policies */ +struct dbs_data *gdbs_data; +struct cpu_dbs_common_info *(*get_cpu_cdbs)(int cpu);void *(*get_cpu_dbs_info_s)(int cpu);void (*gov_dbs_timer)(struct work_struct *work);
@@ -177,11 +196,12 @@ static inline int
delay_for_sampling_rate(unsigned int sampling_rate)
return delay;
}
-#define declare_show_sampling_rate_min() \
+#define declare_show_sampling_rate_min(_gov) \
static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, \
char *buf) \
{ \
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = NULL; \
+ _gov##_get_tuners(policy, &dbs_data); \
return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dbs_data->min_sampling_rate); \
}
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c index 29ed48a..4860137 100644
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +3 -0
@@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ max_delay: }/************************** sysfs interface ************************/ +static struct common_dbs_data od_dbs_cdata; +declare_get_tuners (od); +/** * update_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed. * @new_rate: new sampling rate
@@ -321,12 +324,14 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data
*dbs_data,
static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = NULL;
unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1)
return -EINVAL;
+
+ od_get_tuners(policy, &dbs_data);
update_sampling_rate(dbs_data, input);
return count;
}
@@ -334,8 +339,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_io_is_busy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = od_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
unsigned int j;
@@ -358,8 +362,7 @@ static ssize_t store_io_is_busy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = od_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -379,8 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = od_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input, j;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -401,8 +403,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const
char *buf,
size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = od_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
@@ -437,8 +438,7 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
static ssize_t store_powersave_bias(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = od_get_tuners(policy, NULL); unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ show_one(od, up_threshold, up_threshold);
show_one(od, sampling_down_factor, sampling_down_factor); show_one(od, ignore_nice, ignore_nice);
show_one(od, powersave_bias, powersave_bias);
-declare_show_sampling_rate_min(); +declare_show_sampling_rate_min(od);
cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(sampling_rate); cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(io_is_busy);
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy();
dbs_data->tuners = tuners;
+ pr_info("%s: tuners %p\n", __func__, tuners); mutex_init(&dbs_data->mutex);
return 0;
}
include/linux/cpufreq.h +0 -0
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned
long old, u_int div, u_int mu
struct cpufreq_governor {
char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
+ int initialized;
int (*governor) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int event);
ssize_t (*show_setspeed) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -323,6 +324,7 @@ const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);
int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu); int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+bool have_multiple_policies(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
/* query the current CPU frequency (in kHz). If zero, cpufreq
couldn't detect it */
From caca8b15798ecc5ae1a46dc2dc8ed66c2ff7519b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <caca8b15798ecc5ae1a46dc2dc8ed66c2ff7519b.1364378275.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:20:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of
governors
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 24 ++++++------ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 28 ++++++++++++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 25 ++++++------ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 + 6 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +13 -0
@@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)return cpufreq_global_kobject; } +bool have_multiple_policies (void ) +{ +return cpufreq_driver->have_multiple_policies; +} +static struct cpufreq_policy *__cpufreq_cpu_get (unsigned int cpu,bool sysfs) {struct cpufreq_policy *data;
@@ -1554,6 +1559,13 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, policy->cpu, event); ret = policy->governor->governor (policy, event); +if (!ret) { +if (event ==CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT ) + policy->governor->initialized++; +else if (event ==CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT ) + policy->governor->initialized--; + } +/* we keep one module reference alive for each CPU governed by this CPU */ if ((event !=CPUFREQ_GOV_START ) || ret)
@@ -1577,6 +1589,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)mutex_lock (&cpufreq_governor_mutex); + governor->initialized =0 ; err = -EBUSY ;if (__find_governor (governor->name) ==NULL ) { err =0 ;
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +11 -13
@@ -157,11 +157,13 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, }/************************** sysfs interface ************************/ +static struct common_dbs_data cs_dbs_cdata; +declare_get_tuners (cs); +static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners =cs_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -176,8 +178,8 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_sampling_rate (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct dbs_data *dbs_data =NULL ; +struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners =cs_get_tuners (policy, &dbs_data);unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -192,8 +194,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_up_threshold (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners =cs_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -208,8 +209,7 @@ static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_down_threshold (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners =cs_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ static ssize_t store_down_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_ignore_nice (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners =cs_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input, j;int ret;
@@ -259,8 +258,7 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_freq_step (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners =cs_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -285,7 +283,7 @@ show_one(cs, up_threshold, up_threshold);show_one (cs, down_threshold, down_threshold);show_one (cs, ignore_nice, ignore_nice);show_one (cs, freq_step, freq_step); -declare_show_sampling_rate_min (); +declare_show_sampling_rate_min (cs);cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (sampling_rate);cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (sampling_down_factor);
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +50 -21
127 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h +24 -4
@@ -40,13 +40,29 @@/* Ondemand Sampling types */ enum {OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE ,OD_SUB_SAMPLE }; + +#define declare_get_tuners (_gov) \ +static struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *_gov##_get_tuners \ +(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct dbs_data **ldbs_data) \ +{ \ + if (have_multiple_policies()) { \ + struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \ + if (ldbs_data) \ + *ldbs_data = dbs_data; \ + return dbs_data->tuners; \ + } else { \ + if (ldbs_data) \ + *ldbs_data = _gov##_dbs_cdata.gdbs_data; \ + return _gov##_dbs_cdata.gdbs_data->tuners; \ + } \ +} +/* Macro creating sysfs show routines */ #define show_one (_gov, file_name, object) \ static ssize_t show_##file_name \ (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) \ { \ - struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \ - struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *tuners = dbs_data->tuners; \ + struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *tuners = _gov##_get_tuners(policy, NULL); \ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", tuners->file_name); \ }
@@ -133,6 +149,9 @@ struct common_dbs_data {int governor;struct attribute_group *attr_group; +/* Common data for platforms that don't set have_multiple_policies */ +struct dbs_data *gdbs_data; +struct cpu_dbs_common_info *(*get_cpu_cdbs)(int cpu);void *(*get_cpu_dbs_info_s)(int cpu);void (*gov_dbs_timer)(struct work_struct *work);
@@ -177,11 +196,12 @@ static inline int delay_for_sampling_rate(unsigned int sampling_rate)return delay; } -#define declare_show_sampling_rate_min () \ +#define declare_show_sampling_rate_min (_gov) \ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, \ char *buf) \ { \ - struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \ + struct dbs_data *dbs_data = NULL; \ + _gov##_get_tuners(policy, &dbs_data); \ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dbs_data->min_sampling_rate); \ }
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +13 -12
@@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ max_delay: }/************************** sysfs interface ************************/ +static struct common_dbs_data od_dbs_cdata; +declare_get_tuners (od); +/** * update_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed. * @new_rate: new sampling rate
@@ -321,12 +324,14 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,static ssize_t store_sampling_rate (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; +struct dbs_data *dbs_data =NULL ;unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);if (ret !=1 )return -EINVAL ; + +od_get_tuners (policy, &dbs_data);update_sampling_rate (dbs_data, input);return count; }
@@ -334,8 +339,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_io_is_busy (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners =od_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret;unsigned int j;
@@ -358,8 +362,7 @@ static ssize_t store_io_is_busy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,static ssize_t store_up_threshold (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners =od_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -379,8 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners =od_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input, j;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -401,8 +403,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,static ssize_t store_ignore_nice (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners =od_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret;
@@ -437,8 +438,7 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,static ssize_t store_powersave_bias (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf,size_t count) { -struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; -struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; +struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners =od_get_tuners (policy,NULL );unsigned int input;int ret; ret =sscanf (buf,"%u" , &input);
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ show_one(od, up_threshold, up_threshold);show_one (od, sampling_down_factor, sampling_down_factor);show_one (od, ignore_nice, ignore_nice);show_one (od, powersave_bias, powersave_bias); -declare_show_sampling_rate_min (); +declare_show_sampling_rate_min (od);cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (sampling_rate);cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (io_is_busy);
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data) tuners->io_is_busy =should_io_be_busy (); dbs_data->tuners = tuners; +pr_info ("%s: tuners %p\n" , __func__, tuners);mutex_init (&dbs_data->mutex);return 0 ; }
include/linux/cpufreq.h +2 -0
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div, u_int mustruct cpufreq_governor {char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN ]; +int initialized;int (*governor) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int event); ssize_t (*show_setspeed) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -323,6 +324,7 @@ const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);int cpufreq_get_policy (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int cpu);int cpufreq_update_policy (unsigned int cpu);struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy); +bool have_multiple_policies (void );#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ /* query the current CPU frequency (in kHz). If zero, cpufreq couldn't detect it */
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 3 lines · Viresh Kumar
I am still stuck at a issue, which i am not able to fix.
- cat of */cpufreq/ondemand/** isn't showing anything on console, but all pointers are correctly set and i can see the right values withprintk()
The culprit is the part where i changed prototypes of all show/store functions. I am still trying to understand how that part works, and will fix it soon.
--
viresh
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Quoted 7 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 3 lines · Viresh Kumar
I am still stuck at a issue, which i am not able to fix.
- cat of */cpufreq/ondemand/** isn't showing anything on console, but all pointers are correctly set and i can see the right values withprintk()The culprit is the part where i changed prototypes of all show/store functions. I am still trying to understand how that part works, and will fix it soon.
It seems i have broken some other stuff too with this patch:
commit 63173d01761a442ac5a7c73de996acbe9b0b3da7
Author: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Date: Wed Feb 6 15:37:37 2013 +0530
cpufreq: Get rid of "struct global_attr"
We don't need to keep two structures for file attributes, global_attr and freq_attr. Lets use freq_attr only for cpufreq core and drivers.
--- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 ++++----- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 16 ----------------
Atleast both acpi-cpufreq and intel_pstate (including cpufreq as a whole). :(
And i don't want to post any more fixups now.. they are huge and will create more confusion..
Rather i will send next version of my patchset and ask Rafael to drop earlier patches.
Will cc you, please try them at your end.
--
viresh
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH v3 3/4 cpufreq: Get rid of "struct global_attr"
In reply to Viresh KumarWe don't need to keep two structures for file attributes, global_attr and freq_attr. Lets use freq_attr only for cpufreq core and drivers.
--- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 ++++----- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 16 ---------------- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +4 -5
@@ -160,19 +160,18 @@ static ssize_t _store_boost(const char *buf, size_t count)return count; } -static ssize_t store_global_boost (struct kobject *kobj,struct attribute *attr, -const char *buf,size_t count) +static ssize_t store_global_boost (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, +const char *buf,size_t count) {return _store_boost (buf, count); } -static ssize_t show_global_boost (struct kobject *kobj, -struct attribute *attr,char *buf) +static ssize_t show_global_boost (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,char *buf) {return sprintf (buf,"%u\n" , boost_enabled); } -static struct global_attr global_boost =__ATTR (boost,0644 , +static struct freq_attr global_boost =__ATTR (boost,0644 , show_global_boost, store_global_boost);
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +10 -10
@@ -275,13 +275,13 @@ static void intel_pstate_debug_expose_params(void)/************************** sysfs begin ************************/ #define show_one (file_name, object) \ static ssize_t show_##file_name \ - (struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf) \ + (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) \ { \ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", limits.object); \ } -static ssize_t store_no_turbo (struct kobject *a,struct attribute *b, -const char *buf,size_t count) +static ssize_t store_no_turbo (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,const char *buf, +size_t count) {unsigned int input;int ret;
@@ -293,8 +293,8 @@ static ssize_t store_no_turbo(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,return count; } -static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct (struct kobject *a,struct attribute *b, -const char *buf,size_t count) +static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, +const char *buf,size_t count) {unsigned int input;int ret;
@@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,return count; } -static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct (struct kobject *a,struct attribute *b, -const char *buf,size_t count) +static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, +const char *buf,size_t count) {unsigned int input;int ret;
@@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ show_one(no_turbo, no_turbo);show_one (max_perf_pct, max_perf_pct);show_one (min_perf_pct, min_perf_pct); -define_one_global_rw (no_turbo); -define_one_global_rw (max_perf_pct); -define_one_global_rw (min_perf_pct); +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (no_turbo); +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (max_perf_pct); +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw (min_perf_pct);static struct attribute *intel_pstate_attributes[] = { &no_turbo.attr,
include/linux/cpufreq.h +0 -16
@@ -320,22 +320,6 @@ __ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL)static struct freq_attr _name = \ __ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name) -struct global_attr { -struct attribute attr; -ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, -struct attribute *attr,char *buf); -ssize_t (*store)(struct kobject *a,struct attribute *b, -const char *c,size_t count); -}; - -#define define_one_global_ro (_name) \ -static struct global_attr _name = \ -__ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL) - -#define define_one_global_rw (_name) \ -static struct global_attr _name = \ -__ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name) -struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get (unsigned int cpu);void cpufreq_cpu_put (struct cpufreq_policy *data);const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver (void );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH v3 4/4 cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
In reply to Viresh Kumarhave_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
--- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 +++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig +3 -0
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ config CPU_FREQ_TABLE config CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON bool +config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES + bool + config CPU_FREQ_STAT tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics" select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
include/linux/cpufreq.h +4 -0
@@ -107,11 +107,13 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {unsigned int policy;/* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor;/* see below */ void *governor_data; +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES /* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple * clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs * directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ * directory */ bool have_multiple_policies; +#endif struct work_struct update;/* if update_policy() needs to be * called, but you're in IRQ context */
@@ -142,9 +144,11 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)static inline struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES if (policy->have_multiple_policies)return &policy->kobj; else +#endif return cpufreq_global_kobject; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 44 lines · Viresh Kumar
have_multiple_policiesis required by platforms having multiple clock-domains for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in aKconfigoption for enabling execution of this code.Reported-by Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>--- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 +++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig +3
-0@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ config CPU_FREQ_TABLE config CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON bool +config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES + bool + config CPU_FREQ_STAT tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics" select CPU_FREQ_TABLEinclude/linux/cpufreq.h +2
-0@@ -107,11 +107,13 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {unsigned int policy;/* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor;/* see below */ void *governor_data; +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES /* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple * clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs * directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ * directory */ bool have_multiple_policies; +#endif struct work_struct update;/* if update_policy() needs to be * called, but you're in IRQ context */
include/linux/cpufreq.h static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) · line 153
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/cpufreq.h +2
-0@@ -142,9 +144,11 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)static inline struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES if (policy->have_multiple_policies)return &policy->kobj; else +#endif return cpufreq_global_kobject; }
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES and keep have_multiple_policies unset at the same time?
Rafael
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIESand keephave_multiple_policiesunset at the same time?
No, they are redundant. That's why i have been forcing to drop this patch.
Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 8 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIESand keephave_multiple_policiesunset at the same time?No, they are redundant. That's why i have been forcing to drop this patch.
I see.
What about having the Kconfig option alone, however?
Rafael
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 8 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 7 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIESand keephave_multiple_policiesunset at the same time?
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
No, they are redundant. That's why i have been forcing to drop this patch.
I see.
What about having the
Kconfigoption alone, however?
Even that is not enough. We build multiplatform kernels and so need a variable to be set by platform.
Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 9 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 8 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 7 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIESand keephave_multiple_policiesunset at the same time?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
No, they are redundant. That's why i have been forcing to drop this patch.
I see.
What about having the
Kconfigoption alone, however?Even that is not enough. We build multiplatform kernels and so need a variable to be set by platform.
Which means the Kconfig option and the field are not redundant in fact.
But do we need the field to reside in the policy structure? It looks like it may just be a global bool variable (in which case the Kconfig option could be dropped IMO). Is there any particular reason to put that thing into struct cpufreq_policy?
Rafael
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 12 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 11 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 10 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 8 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIESand keephave_multiple_policiesunset at the same time?No, they are redundant. That's why i have been forcing to drop this patch.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I see.
What about having the
Kconfigoption alone, however?Even that is not enough. We build multiplatform kernels and so need a variable to be set by platform.
Which means the
Kconfigoption and the field are not redundant in fact.
Yes. Redundant was the wrong word. Actually Kconfig option is just not required as we can work efficiently without it.
Quoted 2 lines
But do we need the field to reside in the policy structure? It looks like it may just be a global bool variable
Yes. It is not per policy but per cpufreq driver. And this can be done by sharing
a function from cpufreq core to driver. But when do you want me to call this function
(which will set this global variable). If we do it from init, then we will end up calling it
again and again. Then it has to be called before calling cpufreq_register_driver(),
as init() gets called internally.
Quoted 1 line
(in which case the
Kconfigoption could be dropped IMO).
We are aligned now :)
Quoted 2 lines
Is there any particular reason to put that thing into struct
cpufreq_policy?
Just the problem i mentioned to you.
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Quoted 1 line · Viresh Kumar
But when do you want me to call this function
Guess what, i got answer to this question: struct cpufreq_driver :)