RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one.
cover RFC: Add recipe of gtk3 version of vte alongside gtk2 one.
RFC only! Patch is only build-tested.
Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE core.
Later versions depend on gtk3. Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)
that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must
contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by
other programs).
This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside
with 0.28.2 version.
How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected despite gtk3-version being newer?
- ML
The following changes since commit 8f5bc47729edb8cb051d81e9ff1680cb8d2eca25:
dropbear: a fix for hang in dropbearkey, built for x32 (2013-05-24 14:14:30 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib cazfi/rfc
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=cazfi/rfc
Marko Lindqvist (1):
vte: add 0.34.5 recipe
.../vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch | 14 ++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc | 4 +++- meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb | 6 ++++-- meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb | 12 ++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH 1/1 vte: add 0.34.5 recipe
Add latest vte version for gtk3-based systems. Keep 0.28.2 as it's last gtk2-compatible version.
--- .../vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch | 14 ++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc | 4 +++- meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb | 6 ++++-- meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb | 12 ++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte-0.34.5/obsolete_automake_macros.patch new file +14 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691545] + +Signed-off-by: Marko Lindqvist <[email protected]> +diff -Nurd vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in +--- vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in 2010-07-15 20:08:44.000000000 +0300 ++++ vte-0.28.2/gnome-pty-helper/configure.in 2013-01-11 14:50:34.971027440 +0200 +@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ + AC_ISC_POSIX + AC_PROG_CC + AC_STDC_HEADERS +-AM_PROG_CC_STDC + + if test -z "$enable_maintainer_mode"; then + enable_maintainer_mode=yes
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte.inc +3 -1
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ DESCRIPTION = "vte is a virtual terminal emulator" BUGTRACKER = "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=vte" LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" -DEPENDS = " glib-2.0 gtk+ intltool-native ncurses gobject-introspection-stub" +DEPENDS = " glib-2.0 intltool-native ncurses gobject-introspection-stub" RDEPENDS_libvte = "vte-termcap" +GNOME_COMPRESS_TYPE = "xz" + inherit gnome gtk-doc EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-python --disable-introspection"
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.28.2.bb +4 -2
@@ -6,5 +6,7 @@ PR = "r6" SRC_URI += "file://obsolete_automake_macros.patch" -SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "f07a4bf943194f94b7f142db8f7f36dc" -SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "8d04e202b617373dfb47689e5e628febe2c58840b34cccc4af4feb88c48df903" +SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "497f26e457308649e6ece32b3bb142ff" +SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "86cf0b81aa023fa93ed415653d51c96767f20b2d7334c893caba71e42654b0ae" + +DEPENDS += "gtk+"
meta/recipes-support/vte/vte_0.34.5.bb new file +12 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +require vte.inc + +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=3bf50002aefd002f49e7bb854063f7e7" + +PR = "r0" + +SRC_URI += "file://obsolete_automake_macros.patch" + +SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "ce1f11568992df8e61c9366918fed571" +SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "8847fb75b620a94ba62c2ffd9e1653396978106f294574ba24a19ced259a7351" + +DEPENDS += "gtk+3"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Quoted 2 lines · Marko Lindqvist
Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE core. Later versions depend on gtk3.
vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.
Quoted 8 lines
Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)
that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must
contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by
other programs).
This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside
with 0.28.2 version.
How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected despite gtk3-version being newer?
Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3 vte vte3_3.34.5.bb?
Ross
Quoted 7 lines · Ross
Quoted 1 line · Marko Lindqvist
Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE
core.
Quoted 1 line
Later versions depend on gtk3.
vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.
0.30.0 NEWS states that "dropped support for gtk2". While this sounds like
upstream 0.28.2 would work with either gtk2 or gtk3, OE recipe depends on "gtk+", which is always gtk2?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages) that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by other programs).
This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside with 0.28.2 version.
How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected
Quoted 5 lines
despite gtk3-version being newer?
Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3 vte vte3_3.34.5.bb?
I think calling it vte3 would be confusing at best, when vte itself is not
version 3.x. How about "vte-gtk3"?
- ML
Quoted 24 lines · Marko Lindqvist
Quoted 7 lines · Ross
Quoted 1 line · Marko Lindqvist
Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE
core.
Quoted 1 line
Later versions depend on gtk3.
vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.
0.30.0 NEWS states that "dropped support for gtk2". While this sounds
like upstream 0.28.2 would work with either gtk2 or gtk3, OE recipe depends on "gtk+", which is always gtk2?Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make
sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages) that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by other programs).
This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5,alongside
Quoted 2 lines
with 0.28.2 version.
How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
despite gtk3-version being newer?
Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3 vte vte3_3.34.5.bb?
I think calling it vte3 would be confusing at best, when vte itself is
not version 3.x. How about "vte-gtk3"?
So I would say to rename vte to vte-gtk2 at same time and make it provide vte for now.
Signature · 3 lines
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750