audit by executable name
v6 cover audit by executable name
Please see the accompanying userspace patchset:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2015-July/thread.html
[[PATCH V2] 0/2] Log on the future execution of a path
The userspace interface is not expected to change appreciably unless something important has been overlooked. Setting and deleting rules works as expected.
If the path does not exist at rule creation time, it will be re-evaluated every time there is a change to the parent directory at which point the change in device and inode will be noted.
Here's a sample run:
Test for addition, trigger and deletion of tree executable rule:
# auditctl -a always,exit -S all -F dir=/tmp -F exe=/usr/bin/touch -F key=exetest_tree ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1436629310.720:44711): auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op="add_rule" key="exetest_tree" list=4 res=1 ----
# /usr/bin/touch /tmp/test ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): proctitle=2F7573722F62696E2F746F756368002F746D702F74657374 type=PATH msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): item=1 name="/tmp/test" inode=166932 dev=00:24 mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 nametype=CREATE type=PATH msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): item=0 name="/tmp/" inode=11525 dev=00:24 mode=041777 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 nametype=PARENT type=CWD msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): cwd="/root" type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=yes exit=3 a0=7ffdee2f9e27 a1=941 a2=1b6 a3=691 items=2 ppid=17655 pid=17762 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=ttyS0 ses=1 comm="touch" exe="/usr/bin/touch" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key="exetest_tree" ----
# auditctl -d always,exit -S all -F dir=/tmp -F exe=/usr/bin/touch -F key=exetest_tree ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1436629310.839:44713): auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op="remove_rule" key="exetest_tree" list=4 res=1 ----
Revision history:
v6: Explicitly declare prototypes as external.
Rename audit_dup_exe() to audit_dupe_exe() consistent with rule, watch, lsm_field. Rebased on v4.1.
Rename audit_remove_mark_rule() called from audit_mark_handle_event() to
audit_autoremove_mark_rule() to avoid confusion with audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule() usage.
Add audit_remove_mark_rule() to provide similar interface as
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule().
Simplify stubs to defines.
Rename audit_free_fsnotify_mark() to audit_fsnotify_free_mark() in keeping with
the naming convention of inotify_free_mark(), dnotify_free_mark(), fanotify_free_mark(), audit_watch_free_mark().
Return -ENOMEM rather than null in case of memory allocation failure for
audit_mark in audit_alloc_mark().
Rename audit_free_mark() to audit_mark_free() to avoid association with
{i,d,fa}notify_free_mark() and audit_watch_free_mark().
Clean up exe with similar interface as watch and tree.
Clean up audit exe mark just before audit_free_rule() rather than in it to
avoid mutex in software interrupt context.
Fixed bug in audit_dupe_exe() that returned error rather than valid pointer.
v5: Revert patch "Let audit_free_rule() take care of calling
audit_remove_mark()." since it caused a group mark deadlock.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-October/msg00024.html
v4: Re-order and squash down fixups
Fix audit_dup_exe() to copy pathname string before calling audit_alloc_mark().
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00065.html
v3: Rationalize and rename some function names and clean up get/put and free code.
Rename several "watch" references to "mark".
Rename audit_remove_rule() to audit_remove_mark_rule().
Let audit_free_rule() take care of calling audit_remove_mark(). Put audit_alloc_mark() arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode. Move the access to the entry for audit_match_signal() to the beginning
of the function in case the entry found is the same one passed in. This will enable it to be used by audit_remove_mark_rule().
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-July/msg00000.html
v2: Misguided attempt to add in audit_exe similar to watches
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-June/msg00066.html
v1.5: eparis' switch to fsnotify
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00046.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00066.html
v1: Change to path interface instead of inode
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00017.html
v0: Peter Moodie's original patches
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2012-August/msg00033.html
Future step:
Get full-path notify working.
Eric Paris (1):
audit: implement audit by executable
Richard Guy Briggs (3):
audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
include/linux/audit.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 33 ++++++ kernel/audit_exe.c | 50 +++++++++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 + kernel/audit_watch.c | 4 + kernel/auditfilter.c | 63 +++++++++++- kernel/auditsc.c | 16 +++ 10 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_exe.c create mode 100644 kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
PATCH v6 1/4 audit: implement audit by executable
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Rename audit_dup_exe() to audit_dupe_exe() consistent with rule, watch, lsm_field.
--- include/linux/audit.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 32 +++++++++++++ kernel/audit_exe.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/auditsc.c | 16 ++++++ 7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_exe.c
include/linux/audit.h +1 -0
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct audit_krule {struct audit_field *inode_f;/* quick access to an inode field */ struct audit_watch *watch;/* associated watch */ struct audit_tree *tree;/* associated watched tree */ +struct audit_exe *exe;struct list_head rlist;/* entry in audit_{watch,tree}.rules list */ struct list_head list;/* for AUDIT_LIST* purposes only */ u64 prio;
include/uapi/linux/audit.h +2 -0
@@ -266,6 +266,8 @@#define AUDIT_OBJ_UID 109#define AUDIT_OBJ_GID 110#define AUDIT_FIELD_COMPARE 111 +#define AUDIT_EXE 112 +#define AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN 113#define AUDIT_ARG0 200#define AUDIT_ARG1 (AUDIT_ARG0+1)
kernel/Makefile +1 -1
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o +obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE) += audit_tree.o obj-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += gcov/ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o
kernel/audit.h +32 -0
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ; +struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;
@@ -269,6 +270,13 @@ extern int audit_add_watch(struct audit_krule *krule, struct list_head **list);extern void audit_remove_watch_rule (struct audit_krule *krule);extern char *audit_watch_path (struct audit_watch *watch);extern int audit_watch_compare (struct audit_watch *watch,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); + +extern int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op); +extern void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule); +extern char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe); +extern int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old); +extern int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe); +#else #define audit_put_watch (w) {}#define audit_get_watch (w) {}
@@ -278,6 +286,30 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev#define audit_watch_path (w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +BUG (); + return -EINVAL +} +static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +109 -0
109 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditfilter.c +44 -0
80 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditsc.c +16 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@#include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/dcache.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/export.h>
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <uapi/linux/limits.h>
@@ -466,6 +468,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + { +struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) { +if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + } + } + } +break ;case AUDIT_UID : result =audit_uid_comparator (cred->uid, f->op, f->uid);break ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Re: [PATCH V6 1/4] audit: implement audit by executable
Quoted 7 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
This needs work. Either this patch is incomplete as the description says, in which case I'm not going to merge it, or the description is out of date and needs to be updated.
If later patches in the series fix deficiencies in this patch (I haven't gotten past this description yet) then we should consider merging some of the patches together so they are more useful.
Quoted 6 lines
RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Renameaudit_dup_exe()toaudit_dupe_exe()consistent with rule, watch,lsm_field.Based-on-user-interface-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>Based-on-idea-by Peter Moody <[email protected]>
I'm not fully up on the different patch metadata the cool kids are using these days, but I think it is okay to simply credit Peter in the patch description and omit the two lines above. Giving credit is important, but these metadata tags are a bit silly in my opinion.
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
It has been a while since I've looked at Eric's original patch, but considering considering some of the work involved, I think it is reasonable to claim this patch as your own and credit Eric in the patch description.
Quoted 24 lines
kernel/audit.h +15
-0@@ -278,6 +286,30 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev #define audit_watch_path(w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +static inline int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct
kernel/audit.h extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch · line 313
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit.h +7
-0audit_krule *old) +{ +BUG (); + return -EINVAL +} +static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */
Not a big fan of the BUG() calls in the stubs above, let's get rid of them. Yes, I know some other audit stubs are defined as BUG(), or similar, those aren't a good idea either, but they are already there ...
Quoted 58 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +33
-0@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +/* audit_exe.c -- filtering of audit events +* +* Copyright 2014-2015 Red Hat, Inc. +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +*/ + +#define pr_fmt (fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/audit.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/namei.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include "audit.h" + +struct audit_exe { +char *pathname; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; +}; + +/* Translate a watch string to kernel respresentation. */ +int audit_make_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, int len,u32 op)
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +18
-0+{ +struct audit_exe *exe; +struct path path; +struct dentry *dentry; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; + +if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) +return -EINVAL ; + + dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); +if (IS_ERR (dentry)) +return PTR_ERR (dentry); +mutex_unlock (&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); + +if (!dentry->d_inode) +return -ENOENT ; + dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev;
kernel/audit_exe.c line 61
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +10
-0+ ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; +dput (dentry); + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ; + exe->ino = ino; + exe->dev = dev; + exe->pathname = pathname; + krule->exe = exe;
You don't need the dev and ino variables here, just move the kmalloc() to just after the dentry->d_inode check ... or put it after the sanity checks, although you'll have to be careful to free it on error.
kernel/audit_exe.c line 74
Quoted 12 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +12
-0+return 0 ; +} + +void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe = krule->exe; + krule->exe =NULL ; +kfree (exe->pathname); +kfree (exe); +}
Not your fault, and nothing to change here, but I really hate how audit dups strings outside the rule creation functions, but frees the strings in the rule free routines; it's almost asking to be misused.
Quoted 24 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +24
-0+char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +return exe->pathname; +} + +int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ; + + exe->pathname =kstrdup (old->exe->pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe->pathname) { +kfree (exe); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + exe->ino = old->exe->ino; + exe->dev = old->exe->dev; + new->exe = exe; + +return 0 ;
kernel/audit_exe.c line 109
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +10
-0+} + +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino != exe->ino) +return 0 ; +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev != exe->dev) +return 0 ; +return 1 ; +}
I suspect Eric put the above functions in a separate file to ease development (no need to work about messy porting as upstream moved on), but I see no reason why these functions couldn't be folded into auditfilter.c.
Quoted 29 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +7
-0@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@#include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/dcache.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/export.h> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <uapi/linux/limits.h> @@ -466,6 +468,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + {
kernel/auditsc.c static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, · line 485
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +9
-0+struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) { +if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + } + } + } +break ;
I don't completely understand the point of AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN filter, what problem are we trying to solve? It checks to see if there is an executable match starting with the current process and walking up the process' parents in the current pid namespace?
Help me understand what this accomplishes, I'm a little tried right now and I just don't get it.
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 1/4] audit: implement audit by executable
Quoted 9 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 7 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
Quoted 3 lines
This needs work. Either this patch is incomplete as the description says, in which case I'm not going to merge it, or the description is out of date and needs to be updated.
It is pretty close to the original, so the description is valid, however combining this patch with 3/4 and 4/4 triggers a rewrite.
Quoted 3 lines
If later patches in the series fix deficiencies in this patch (I haven't gotten past this description yet) then we should consider merging some of the patches together so they are more useful.
Ok, no problem. (More below...)
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Renameaudit_dup_exe()toaudit_dupe_exe()consistent with rule, watch,lsm_field.Based-on-user-interface-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>Based-on-idea-by Peter Moody <[email protected]>I'm not fully up on the different patch metadata the cool kids are using these days, but I think it is okay to simply credit Peter in the patch description and omit the two lines above. Giving credit is important, but these metadata tags are a bit silly in my opinion.
Fair enough. If it doesn't need to be machine-readable, I'll merge it into the patch description prose.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>It has been a while since I've looked at Eric's original patch, but considering considering some of the work involved, I think it is reasonable to claim this patch as your own and credit Eric in the patch description.
I left it in his authorship since all I did was declare the prototypes explicitly as external and renamed one funciton by one letter. I didn't think that meritted claiming authorhship, but if I merge it as you recommend and makes sense to me, there's no reason not to assume authorship.
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
kernel/audit.h +18
-0@@ -278,6 +286,30 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev #define audit_watch_path(w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +BUG (); + return -EINVAL +}
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit.h extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev · line 313
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/audit.h +4
-0+static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ Not a big fan of the
BUG()calls in the stubs above, let's get rid of them.
Ok, that way I can more easily convert them to #defines.
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, I know some other audit stubs are defined as
BUG(), or similar, those aren't a good idea either, but they are already there ...
Ok, cleanup patch later...
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 64 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +33
-0@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +/* audit_exe.c -- filtering of audit events +* +* Copyright 2014-2015 Red Hat, Inc. +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +*/ + +#define pr_fmt (fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/audit.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/namei.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include "audit.h" + +struct audit_exe { +char *pathname; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; +}; + +/* Translate a watch string to kernel respresentation. */ +int audit_make_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, int len,u32 op)
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +24
-0+{ +struct audit_exe *exe; +struct path path; +struct dentry *dentry; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; + +if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) +return -EINVAL ; + + dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); +if (IS_ERR (dentry)) +return PTR_ERR (dentry); +mutex_unlock (&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); + +if (!dentry->d_inode) +return -ENOENT ; + dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; +dput (dentry); + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ;
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 61
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+ exe->ino = ino; + exe->dev = dev; + exe->pathname = pathname; + krule->exe = exe;You don't need the dev and ino variables here, just move the
kmalloc()to just after thedentry->d_inodecheck ... or put it after the sanity checks, although you'll have to be careful to free it on error.
I'll take a closer look. As referenced elsewhere, I agree a helper function may be useful.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +8
-0+return 0 ; +} + +void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe = krule->exe;
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 74
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+ krule->exe =NULL ; +kfree (exe->pathname); +kfree (exe); +}Not your fault, and nothing to change here, but I really hate how audit dups strings outside the rule creation functions, but frees the strings in the rule free routines; it's almost asking to be misused.
Again, cleanup patch later maybe...
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 30 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +30
-0+char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +return exe->pathname; +} + +int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ; + + exe->pathname =kstrdup (old->exe->pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe->pathname) { +kfree (exe); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + exe->ino = old->exe->ino; + exe->dev = old->exe->dev; + new->exe = exe; + +return 0 ; +} + +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino != exe->ino) +return 0 ;
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 109
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev != exe->dev) +return 0 ; +return 1 ; +}I suspect Eric put the above functions in a separate file to ease development (no need to work about messy porting as upstream moved on), but I see no reason why these functions couldn't be folded into
auditfilter.c.
I thought it made sense where Eric put it. It somewhat parallelled the watch and tree code. It might be tempting to put it in audit_fsnotify.c, but I don't really want to overload that, since the fsnotify code may be used to simpify the watch code in the future. When we're done after 3/4, audit_exe.c is down to 50 lines...
Mind you, auditsc.c is a bit overloaded with stuff that doesn't necessarily belong there...
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 36 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +13
-0@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@#include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/dcache.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/export.h> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <uapi/linux/limits.h> @@ -466,6 +468,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + { +struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) { +if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + }
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditsc.c static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, · line 485
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +3
-0+ } + } +break ;I don't completely understand the point of
AUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENfilter, what problem are we trying to solve? It checks to see if there is an executable match starting with the current process and walking up the process' parents in the current pid namespace?
Say we want to monitor /usr/sbin/apache2 and all its spawned processes. Set up a rule that uses AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN with /usr/sbin/apache2, then when it spawns a cgi running perl or php, those actions will be caught.
Quoted 2 lines
Help me understand what this accomplishes, I'm a little tried right now and I just don't get it.
This was Peter Moody's idea and it made sense, so we kept it.
Quoted 1 line
paul moore
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
Re: [PATCH V6 1/4] audit: implement audit by executable
Quoted 30 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 9 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 7 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
Quoted 3 lines
This needs work. Either this patch is incomplete as the description says, in which case I'm not going to merge it, or the description is out of date and needs to be updated.
It is pretty close to the original, so the description is valid, however combining this patch with 3/4 and 4/4 triggers a rewrite.
Quoted 3 lines
If later patches in the series fix deficiencies in this patch (I haven't gotten past this description yet) then we should consider merging some of the patches together so they are more useful.
Ok, no problem. (More below...)
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Renameaudit_dup_exe()toaudit_dupe_exe()consistent with rule, watch,lsm_field.Based-on-user-interface-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>Based-on-idea-by Peter Moody <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I'm not fully up on the different patch metadata the cool kids are using these days, but I think it is okay to simply credit Peter in the patch description and omit the two lines above. Giving credit is important, but these metadata tags are a bit silly in my opinion.
Fair enough. If it doesn't need to be machine-readable, I'll merge it into the patch description prose.
You could do a "based on" or similar tag if you want. I'm honestly not sure what the official tags are beyond signed-off, acked, and reviewed. Those are the only ones I really care about anyway ;)
It isn't something I care enough about to reject a patch over, I figured you were going to need to do some respin work anyway so I wanted to mention it.
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 35 lines
kernel/audit.h +19
-0@@ -278,6 +286,30 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev #define audit_watch_path(w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +BUG (); + return -EINVAL +} +static inline int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct
audit_exe*exe) +{kernel/audit.h +3
-0+BUG (); +return 0 ; +}Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
#endif /*
CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH*/Not a big fan of the
BUG()calls in the stubs above, let's get rid of them.
Quoted 6 lines
Ok, that way I can more easily convert them to #defines.
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, I know some other audit stubs are defined as
BUG(), or similar, those aren't a good idea either, but they are already there ...Ok, cleanup patch later...
Much later. It isn't something I worry much about, I just don't want to see us going crazy with BUG assertions in new code.
Quoted 73 lines
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 64 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +33
-0@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +/* audit_exe.c -- filtering of audit events +* +* Copyright 2014-2015 Red Hat, Inc. +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +*/ + +#define pr_fmt (fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/audit.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/namei.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include "audit.h" + +struct audit_exe { +char *pathname; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; +}; + +/* Translate a watch string to kernel respresentation. */ +int audit_make_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, intlen, u32 op)
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +24
-0+{ +struct audit_exe *exe; +struct path path; +struct dentry *dentry; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; + +if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) +return -EINVAL ; + + dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); +if (IS_ERR (dentry)) +return PTR_ERR (dentry); +mutex_unlock (&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); + +if (!dentry->d_inode) +return -ENOENT ; + dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; +dput (dentry); + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ;Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 61
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+ exe->ino = ino; + exe->dev = dev; + exe->pathname = pathname; + krule->exe = exe;You don't need the dev and ino variables here, just move the
kmalloc()to just after thedentry->d_inodecheck ... or put it after the sanity checks, although you'll have to be careful to free it on error.
Quoted 2 lines
I'll take a closer look. As referenced elsewhere, I agree a helper function may be useful.
Once again, not something I would worry about for this patchset, let's just get this code fixed up and merged. It was more of an observation that I see a lot of kernel audit structures storing and comparing dev/inode information and each way is slightly different ... I *love* consistency in code to an unhealthy level, so this bugs me a bit more than it probably should.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +8
-0+return 0 ; +} + +void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe = krule->exe;Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 74
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+ krule->exe =NULL ; +kfree (exe->pathname); +kfree (exe); +}Not your fault, and nothing to change here, but I really hate how audit dups strings outside the rule creation functions, but frees the strings in the rule free routines; it's almost asking to be misused.
Quoted 1 line
Again, cleanup patch later maybe...
Yeah ... maybe. World peace too.
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 31 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +31
-0+char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +return exe->pathname; +} + +int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ; + + exe->pathname =kstrdup (old->exe->pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe->pathname) { +kfree (exe); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + exe->ino = old->exe->ino; + exe->dev = old->exe->dev; + new->exe = exe; + +return 0 ; +} + +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino != exe->ino) +return 0 ; +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev != exe->dev)Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 109
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +3
-0+return 0 ; +return 1 ; +}I suspect Eric put the above functions in a separate file to ease development (no need to work about messy porting as upstream moved on), but I see no reason why these functions couldn't be folded into
auditfilter.c.
Quoted 5 lines
I thought it made sense where Eric put it. It somewhat parallelled the watch and tree code. It might be tempting to put it in
audit_fsnotify.c, but I don't really want to overload that, since the fsnotify code may be used to simpify the watch code in the future. When we're done after 3/4,audit_exe.cis down to 50 lines...
See, there ya go ... I don't see the point of adding a new file for 50 lines.
Quoted 2 lines
Mind you,
auditsc.cis a bit overloaded with stuff that doesn't necessarily belong there...
At some point we'll clean things up a bit - most likely as part of the upcoming audit rework - but it doesn't need to happen with this patchset.
Quoted 59 lines
Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 46 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +1
-0@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@#include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/dcache.h> #include <
linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/export.h>kernel/auditsc.c +1
-0@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <
linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <uapi/linux/limits.h>kernel/auditsc.c +7
-0@@ -466,6 +468,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + { +struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) {Quoted 12 lines
kernel/auditsc.c static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, · line 484
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +7
-0+if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + } + } + } +break ;I don't completely understand the point of
AUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENfilter, what problem are we trying to solve? It checks to see if there is an executable match starting with the current process and walking up the process' parents in the current pid namespace?
Quoted 8 lines
Say we want to monitor
/usr/sbin/apache2and all its spawned processes. Set up a rule that usesAUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENwith/usr/sbin/apache2, then when it spawns a cgi running perl or php, those actions will be caught.Quoted 2 lines
Help me understand what this accomplishes, I'm a little tried right now and I just don't get it.
This was Peter Moody's idea and it made sense, so we kept it.
I suppose my confusion is that I see the exe filtering as very similar to our PID filtering, the big difference is that we allow you to match on an on-disk binary and not a running process. We don't currently have a PID_CHILDREN filter and presumably no one has asked for it. Yes we do have PPID, but it only goes up one level, e.g. it's PPID and not PPPPPPPPID, not like the potentially nasty loop we've got with EXE_CHILDREN.
I'm not super excited about the loop so I'd really like to hear how this is solving an actual user need and not just a "hey, wouldn't it be cool?" feature.
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 1/4] audit: implement audit by executable
Quoted 36 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 35 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 9 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 7 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
Quoted 3 lines
This needs work. Either this patch is incomplete as the description says, in which case I'm not going to merge it, or the description is out of date and needs to be updated.
It is pretty close to the original, so the description is valid, however combining this patch with 3/4 and 4/4 triggers a rewrite.
Quoted 3 lines
If later patches in the series fix deficiencies in this patch (I haven't gotten past this description yet) then we should consider merging some of the patches together so they are more useful.
Ok, no problem. (More below...)
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Renameaudit_dup_exe()toaudit_dupe_exe()consistent with rule, watch,lsm_field.Based-on-user-interface-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>Based-on-idea-by Peter Moody <[email protected]>I'm not fully up on the different patch metadata the cool kids are using these days, but I think it is okay to simply credit Peter in the patch description and omit the two lines above. Giving credit is important, but these metadata tags are a bit silly in my opinion.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Fair enough. If it doesn't need to be machine-readable, I'll merge it into the patch description prose.
You could do a "based on" or similar tag if you want. I'm honestly not sure what the official tags are beyond signed-off, acked, and reviewed. Those are the only ones I really care about anyway ;)
From
Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
11) Signed-off-by:
12) Acked-by: and Cc:
13) Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes:
Quoted 2 lines
It isn't something I care enough about to reject a patch over, I figured you were going to need to do some respin work anyway so I wanted to mention it.
The description will need a complete overhaul, so it'll get fixed.
Quoted 282 lines
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 35 lines
kernel/audit.h +19
-0@@ -278,6 +286,30 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev #define audit_watch_path(w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +BUG (); + return -EINVAL +} +static inline int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct
audit_exe*exe) +{kernel/audit.h +3
-0+BUG (); +return 0 ; +}Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
#endif /*
CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH*/Not a big fan of the
BUG()calls in the stubs above, let's get rid of them.Quoted 6 lines
Ok, that way I can more easily convert them to #defines.
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, I know some other audit stubs are defined as
BUG(), or similar, those aren't a good idea either, but they are already there ...Ok, cleanup patch later...
Much later. It isn't something I worry much about, I just don't want to see us going crazy with BUG assertions in new code.
Quoted 73 lines
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 64 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +33
-0@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +/* audit_exe.c -- filtering of audit events +* +* Copyright 2014-2015 Red Hat, Inc. +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +*/ + +#define pr_fmt (fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/audit.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/namei.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include "audit.h" + +struct audit_exe { +char *pathname; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; +}; + +/* Translate a watch string to kernel respresentation. */ +int audit_make_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, intlen, u32 op)
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +24
-0+{ +struct audit_exe *exe; +struct path path; +struct dentry *dentry; +unsigned long ino; +dev_t dev; + +if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) +return -EINVAL ; + + dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); +if (IS_ERR (dentry)) +return PTR_ERR (dentry); +mutex_unlock (&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); + +if (!dentry->d_inode) +return -ENOENT ; + dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; +dput (dentry); + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ;Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 61
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+ exe->ino = ino; + exe->dev = dev; + exe->pathname = pathname; + krule->exe = exe;You don't need the dev and ino variables here, just move the
kmalloc()to just after thedentry->d_inodecheck ... or put it after the sanity checks, although you'll have to be careful to free it on error.Quoted 2 lines
I'll take a closer look. As referenced elsewhere, I agree a helper function may be useful.
Once again, not something I would worry about for this patchset, let's just get this code fixed up and merged. It was more of an observation that I see a lot of kernel audit structures storing and comparing dev/inode information and each way is slightly different ... I *love* consistency in code to an unhealthy level, so this bugs me a bit more than it probably should.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +8
-0+return 0 ; +} + +void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe = krule->exe;Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 74
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +4
-0+ krule->exe =NULL ; +kfree (exe->pathname); +kfree (exe); +}Not your fault, and nothing to change here, but I really hate how audit dups strings outside the rule creation functions, but frees the strings in the rule free routines; it's almost asking to be misused.
Quoted 1 line
Again, cleanup patch later maybe...
Yeah ... maybe. World peace too.
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 31 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +31
-0+char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +return exe->pathname; +} + +int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{ +struct audit_exe *exe; + + exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe) +return -ENOMEM ; + + exe->pathname =kstrdup (old->exe->pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!exe->pathname) { +kfree (exe); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + exe->ino = old->exe->ino; + exe->dev = old->exe->dev; + new->exe = exe; + +return 0 ; +} + +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +{ +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino != exe->ino) +return 0 ; +if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev != exe->dev)Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c line 109
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +3
-0+return 0 ; +return 1 ; +}I suspect Eric put the above functions in a separate file to ease development (no need to work about messy porting as upstream moved on), but I see no reason why these functions couldn't be folded into
auditfilter.c.Quoted 5 lines
I thought it made sense where Eric put it. It somewhat parallelled the watch and tree code. It might be tempting to put it in
audit_fsnotify.c, but I don't really want to overload that, since the fsnotify code may be used to simpify the watch code in the future. When we're done after 3/4,audit_exe.cis down to 50 lines...See, there ya go ... I don't see the point of adding a new file for 50 lines.
Quoted 2 lines
Mind you,
auditsc.cis a bit overloaded with stuff that doesn't necessarily belong there...At some point we'll clean things up a bit - most likely as part of the upcoming audit rework - but it doesn't need to happen with this patchset.
Quoted 59 lines
Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 46 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +1
-0@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@#include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/dcache.h> #include <
linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/export.h>kernel/auditsc.c +1
-0@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <
linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <uapi/linux/limits.h>kernel/auditsc.c +7
-0@@ -466,6 +468,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + { +struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) {Quoted 12 lines
kernel/auditsc.c static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, · line 484
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +7
-0+if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + } + } + } +break ;I don't completely understand the point of
AUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENfilter, what problem are we trying to solve? It checks to see if there is an executable match starting with the current process and walking up the process' parents in the current pid namespace?Quoted 8 lines
Say we want to monitor
/usr/sbin/apache2and all its spawned processes. Set up a rule that usesAUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENwith/usr/sbin/apache2, then when it spawns a cgi running perl or php, those actions will be caught.Quoted 2 lines
Help me understand what this accomplishes, I'm a little tried right now and I just don't get it.
This was Peter Moody's idea and it made sense, so we kept it.
I suppose my confusion is that I see the exe filtering as very similar to our PID filtering, the big difference is that we allow you to match on an on-disk binary and not a running process. We don't currently have a
PID_CHILDRENfilter and presumably no one has asked for it. Yes we do have PPID, but it only goes up one level, e.g. it's PPID and not PPPPPPPPID, not like the potentially nasty loop we've got withEXE_CHILDREN.
Quoted 12 lines
I'm not super excited about the loop so I'd really like to hear how this is solving an actual user need and not just a "hey, wouldn't it be cool?" feature.
Signature · 7 lines
paul moore security @ redhat -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
Re: [PATCH V6 1/4] audit: implement audit by executable
Quoted 9 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 3 lines · Paul Moore
You could do a "based on" or similar tag if you want. I'm honestly not sure what the official tags are beyond signed-off, acked, and reviewed. Those are the only ones I really care about anyway ;)
From
Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
11) Signed-off-by:
12) Acked-by: and Cc:
13) Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes:
... you would think after referring people to this file I would have a better idea of what currently lives in there ;)
Thanks for the info.
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 1/4] audit: implement audit by executable
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsQuoted 9 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 8 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 7 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
<snip>
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +12
-0@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <uapi/linux/limits.h> @@ -466,6 +468,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + { +struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) { +if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + }Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditsc.c static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, · line 485
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/auditsc.c +3
-0+ } + } +break ;I don't completely understand the point of
AUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENfilter, what problem are we trying to solve? It checks to see if there is an executable match starting with the current process and walking up the process' parents in the current pid namespace?
Quoted 8 lines
Say we want to monitor
/usr/sbin/apache2and all its spawned processes. Set up a rule that usesAUDIT_EXE_CHILDRENwith/usr/sbin/apache2, then when it spawns a cgi running perl or php, those actions will be caught.Quoted 2 lines
Help me understand what this accomplishes, I'm a little tried right now and I just don't get it.
This was Peter Moody's idea and it made sense, so we kept it.
Peter, do you have anything to add to justify keeping AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN?
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
paul moore
- RGB
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
PATCH v6 2/4 audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsThis is to be used to audit by executable rules, but audit watches should be able to share this code eventually.
At the moment the audit watch code is a lot more complex, that code only creates one fsnotify watch per parent directory. That 'audit_parent' in turn has a list of 'audit_watches' which contain the name, ino, dev of the specific object we care about. This just creates one fsnotify watch per object we care about. So if you watch 100 inodes in /etc this code will create 100 fsnotify watches on /etc. The audit_watch code will instead create 1 fsnotify watch on /etc (the audit_parent) and then 100 individual watches chained from that fsnotify mark.
We should be able to convert the audit_watch code to do one fsnotify mark per watch and simplify things/remove a whole lot of code. After that conversion we should be able to convert the audit_fsnotify code to support that hierarchy if the optimization is necessary.
RGB: Move the access to the entry for audit_match_signal() to the beginning of the function in case the entry found is the same one passed in. This will enable it to be used by audit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Rename several "watch" references to "mark".
RGB: Rename audit_remove_rule() to audit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Put audit_alloc_mark() arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode.
RGB: Remove space from audit log value text in audit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Rename audit_remove_mark_rule() called from audit_mark_handle_event() to audit_autoremove_mark_rule() to avoid confusion with audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule() usage.
RGB: Add audit_remove_mark_rule() to provide similar interface as audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule().
RGB: Simplify stubs to defines.
RGB: Rename audit_free_fsnotify_mark() to audit_fsnotify_free_mark() in keeping with the naming convention of inotify_free_mark(), dnotify_free_mark(), fanotify_free_mark(), audit_watch_free_mark().
RGB: Return -ENOMEM rather than null in case of memory allocation failure for audit_mark.
RGB: Rename audit_free_mark() to audit_mark_free() to avoid association with {i,d,fa}notify_free_mark() and audit_watch_free_mark().
--- kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 22 ++++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 5 +- 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
kernel/Makefile +1 -1
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o +obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o audit_fsnotify.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE) += audit_tree.o obj-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += gcov/ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o
kernel/audit.h +22 -0
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark ;struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;
@@ -253,6 +254,7 @@ struct audit_net {extern int selinux_audit_rule_update (void );extern struct mutex audit_filter_mutex; +extern int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *);extern void audit_free_rule_rcu (struct rcu_head *);extern struct list_head audit_filter_list[];
@@ -271,6 +273,12 @@ extern void audit_remove_watch_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);extern char *audit_watch_path (struct audit_watch *watch);extern int audit_watch_compare (struct audit_watch *watch,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); +extern struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len); +extern char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); +extern void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +extern void audit_remove_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule); +extern int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); +extern int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op);extern void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule);extern char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe);
@@ -286,6 +294,20 @@ extern int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_exe *exe);#define audit_watch_path (w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +#define audit_alloc_mark (k, p, l) (ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)) +static inline char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +#define audit_remove_mark (m) BUG() +#define audit_remove_mark_rule (k) BUG() +static inline int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) {return -EINVAL ;
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +253 -0
253 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditfilter.c +3 -2
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ error: }/* Remove an existing rule from filterlist. */ -static inline int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) +int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) {struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree;
@@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)int ret =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL int dont_count =0 ; +int match =audit_match_signal (entry);/* If either of these, don't count towards total */ if (entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_USER ||
@@ -1017,7 +1018,7 @@ static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)if (!dont_count) audit_n_rules--; -if (!audit_match_signal (entry)) +if (!match) audit_signals--;#endif mutex_unlock (&audit_filter_mutex);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Re: [PATCH V6 2/4] audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
Quoted 31 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
This is to be used to audit by executable rules, but audit watches should be able to share this code eventually.
At the moment the audit watch code is a lot more complex, that code only creates one fsnotify watch per parent directory. That '
audit_parent' in turn has a list of 'audit_watches' which contain the name, ino, dev of the specific object we care about. This just creates one fsnotify watch per object we care about. So if you watch 100 inodes in /etc this code will create 100 fsnotify watches on /etc. Theaudit_watchcode will instead create 1 fsnotify watch on /etc (theaudit_parent) and then 100 individual watches chained from that fsnotify mark.We should be able to convert the
audit_watchcode to do one fsnotify mark per watch and simplify things/remove a whole lot of code. After that conversion we should be able to convert theaudit_fsnotifycode to support that hierarchy if the optimization is necessary.Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>RGB: Move the access to the entry for
audit_match_signal()to the beginning of the function in case the entry found is the same one passed in. This will enable it to be used byaudit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Rename several "watch" references to "mark".
RGB: Renameaudit_remove_rule()toaudit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Putaudit_alloc_mark()arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode. RGB: Remove space from audit log value text inaudit_autoremove_mark_rule(). RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Renameaudit_remove_mark_rule()called fromaudit_mark_handle_event()toaudit_autoremove_mark_rule()to avoid confusion with audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule() usage.
RGB: Addaudit_remove_mark_rule()to provide similar interface as
Quoted 8 lines
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule().
RGB: Simplify stubs to defines.
RGB: Renameaudit_free_fsnotify_mark()toaudit_fsnotify_free_mark()in keeping with the naming convention ofinotify_free_mark(),dnotify_free_mark(),fanotify_free_mark(),audit_watch_free_mark().
RGB: Return-ENOMEMrather than null in case of memory allocation failure foraudit_mark. RGB: Renameaudit_free_mark()toaudit_mark_free()to avoid association with {i,d,fa}notify_free_mark() andaudit_watch_free_mark().
Definitely enough changes here to call this your own; credit Eric in the description and just stick with your sign off.
Quoted 2 lines
Based-on-code-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Based on the patch description, should this be patch 1/4 instead of 2/4?
Quoted 31 lines
kernel/Makefile +1
-1@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o +obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o audit_fsnotify.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE) += audit_tree.o obj-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += gcov/ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.okernel/audit.h +0
-0@@ -286,6 +294,20 @@ extern int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk,struct
audit_exe*exe); #defineaudit_watch_path(w)""
#defineaudit_watch_compare(w, i, d)0kernel/audit.h +9
-0+#define audit_alloc_mark (k, p, l) (ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)) +static inline char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +#define audit_remove_mark (m) BUG() +#define audit_remove_mark_rule (k) BUG() +static inline int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,
dev_tdev) +{
kernel/audit.h extern int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_exe *exe); · line 309
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/audit.h +3
-0+BUG (); +return 0 ; +}
No BUG(), we've got enough of those things already.
Quoted 22 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +16
-0@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +/* audit_fsnotify.c -- tracking inodes +* +* Copyright 2003-2009,2014-2015 Red Hat, Inc. +* Copyright 2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. +* Copyright 2005 IBM Corporation +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +*/
...
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 62
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +7
-0+static void audit_fsnotify_free_mark (struct fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; + + audit_mark = container_of(mark, struct audit_fsnotify_mark, mark); +audit_mark_free (audit_mark); +}
It seems like audit_fsnotify_mark_free() might be more consistent with the rest of the naming, yes?
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 76
Quoted 13 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +13
-0+#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */ +static void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +{ +if (likely (audit_mark)) +fsnotify_get_mark (&audit_mark->mark); +} + +static void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +{ +if (likely (audit_mark)) +fsnotify_put_mark (&audit_mark->mark); +} +#endif
If this code is '#if 0' let's dump it. We need it or we don't, keeping it around as dead weight is dangerous.
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 88
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +6
-0+char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +return mark->path; +} + +int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino,
dev_tdev) +{kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +4
-0+if (mark->ino == (unsigned long )-1 ) +return 0 ; +return (mark->ino == ino) && (mark->dev == dev); +}
It seems like there should be a #define for -1 inodes, did you check? I generally hate magic numbers like this because I'm pretty stupid and tend to forget their meaning over time ....
Also, at some point we should make (or find?) some generic inode comparison function/macro. I'm amazed at home many times I see (i_foo == ino && i_dev == dev).
Quoted 17 lines
+struct
audit_fsnotify_mark*audit_alloc_mark(structaudit_krule*krule, char *pathname, int len) +{kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +15
-0+struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +struct path path; +struct dentry *dentry; +struct inode *inode; +unsigned long ino; +char *local_pathname; +dev_t dev; +int ret; + +if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) +return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); + + dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); +if (IS_ERR (dentry)) +return (void *)dentry;/* returning an error */
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 116
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +10
-0+ inode = path.dentry->d_inode; +mutex_unlock (&inode->i_mutex); + +if (!dentry->d_inode) { + ino = (unsigned long )-1 ; + dev = (unsigned )-1 ; + }else { + dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; + }
My comments on the ino and dev variables from the other patch apply here.
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 121
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +4
-0+ audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!local_pathname) + goto out;
Why not just kstrdup() into audit_mark->path directly? I don't get the fascination with local variables. Also, why bother with the strdup if the audit_mark malloc is going to fail?
Quoted 24 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +15
-0+ audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { +kfree (local_pathname); + audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + goto out; + } + +fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); + audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; + audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->ino = ino; + audit_mark->dev = dev; + audit_mark->rule = krule; + + ret = fsnotify_add_mark(&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_group, inode,NULL, true); + if (ret < 0) {
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +8
-0+audit_mark_free (audit_mark); + audit_mark =ERR_PTR (ret); + } +out: +dput (dentry); +path_put (&path); +return audit_mark; +}
...
Quoted 3 lines
+static void
audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark, char *op)
+{
That is a lot of letters ... who about audit_mark_log_change()?
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +4
-0+/* Update mark data in audit rules based on fsnotify events. */ +static int audit_mark_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, + struct inode *to_tell, + struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 216
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +10
-0+struct fsnotify_mark *vfsmount_mark, + u32 mask, void *data, int data_type, + const unsigned char *dname, u32 cookie) +{ + struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +struct inode *inode =NULL ; + + audit_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct audit_fsnotify_mark, mark); + +BUG_ON (group != audit_fsnotify_group);
What happens when BUG_ON() is compiled out? Let's back this up with some normal error checking if you think this is a real concern. If it isn't a real concern, why do we have a BUG_ON()? This doesn't strike me as something that is going to be a real problem.
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 228
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +11
-0+switch (data_type) { +case (FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH ): + inode = ((struct path *)data)->dentry->d_inode; +break ; +case (FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE ): + inode = (struct inode *)data; +break ; +default : +BUG (); +return 0 ; + };
We can do better than BUG() in the default catch-all above. Maybe a prink(KERN_ERR ...)?
Quoted 22 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-1@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ error: }/* Remove an existing rule from filterlist. */ -static inline int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) +int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) {struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree;@@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) int ret = 0;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL int dont_count =0 ; +int match =audit_match_signal (entry);/* If either of these, don't count towards total */ if (entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_USER ||
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry · line 1024
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-1@@ -1017,7 +1018,7 @@ static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) if (!dont_count) audit_n_rules--; -if (!audit_match_signal (entry)) +if (!match) audit_signals--;#endif mutex_unlock (&audit_filter_mutex);
Is the bit above worthy of it's own bugfix patch independent of this fsnotify implementation, or is it only an issue with this new fsnotify code?
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 2/4] audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
Quoted 41 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 31 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
This is to be used to audit by executable rules, but audit watches should be able to share this code eventually.
At the moment the audit watch code is a lot more complex, that code only creates one fsnotify watch per parent directory. That '
audit_parent' in turn has a list of 'audit_watches' which contain the name, ino, dev of the specific object we care about. This just creates one fsnotify watch per object we care about. So if you watch 100 inodes in /etc this code will create 100 fsnotify watches on /etc. Theaudit_watchcode will instead create 1 fsnotify watch on /etc (theaudit_parent) and then 100 individual watches chained from that fsnotify mark.We should be able to convert the
audit_watchcode to do one fsnotify mark per watch and simplify things/remove a whole lot of code. After that conversion we should be able to convert theaudit_fsnotifycode to support that hierarchy if the optimization is necessary.Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>RGB: Move the access to the entry for
audit_match_signal()to the beginning of the function in case the entry found is the same one passed in. This will enable it to be used byaudit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Rename several "watch" references to "mark".
RGB: Renameaudit_remove_rule()toaudit_autoremove_mark_rule().
RGB: Putaudit_alloc_mark()arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode. RGB: Remove space from audit log value text inaudit_autoremove_mark_rule(). RGB: Explicitly declare prototypes as extern.
RGB: Renameaudit_remove_mark_rule()called fromaudit_mark_handle_event()toaudit_autoremove_mark_rule()to avoid confusion with audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule() usage.
RGB: Addaudit_remove_mark_rule()to provide similar interface asQuoted 8 lines
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule().
RGB: Simplify stubs to defines.
RGB: Renameaudit_free_fsnotify_mark()toaudit_fsnotify_free_mark()in keeping with the naming convention ofinotify_free_mark(),dnotify_free_mark(),fanotify_free_mark(),audit_watch_free_mark().
RGB: Return-ENOMEMrather than null in case of memory allocation failure foraudit_mark. RGB: Renameaudit_free_mark()toaudit_mark_free()to avoid association with {i,d,fa}notify_free_mark() andaudit_watch_free_mark().
Quoted 2 lines
Definitely enough changes here to call this your own; credit Eric in the description and just stick with your sign off.
Done.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Based-on-code-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>Based on the patch description, should this be patch 1/4 instead of 2/4?
Or 1/2 as you have suggested.
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 21 lines
kernel/Makefile +1
-1@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o +obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o audit_fsnotify.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE) += audit_tree.o obj-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += gcov/ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.okernel/audit.h +0
-0@@ -286,6 +294,20 @@ extern int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk,struct
audit_exe*exe); #defineaudit_watch_path(w)""
#defineaudit_watch_compare(w, i, d)0
Quoted 15 lines
kernel/audit.h extern int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_exe *exe); · line 309
Quoted 13 lines
kernel/audit.h +9
-0+#define audit_alloc_mark (k, p, l) (ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)) +static inline char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +#define audit_remove_mark (m) BUG() +#define audit_remove_mark_rule (k) BUG() +static inline int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,
dev_tdev) +{kernel/audit.h +3
-0+BUG (); +return 0 ; +}No
BUG(), we've got enough of those things already.
Cleaned them out...
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 22 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +16
-0@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +/* audit_fsnotify.c -- tracking inodes +* +* Copyright 2003-2009,2014-2015 Red Hat, Inc. +* Copyright 2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. +* Copyright 2005 IBM Corporation +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +*/ ...
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 62
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +7
-0+static void audit_fsnotify_free_mark (struct fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; + + audit_mark = container_of(mark, struct audit_fsnotify_mark, mark); +audit_mark_free (audit_mark); +}It seems like
audit_fsnotify_mark_free()might be more consistent with the rest of the naming, yes?
Uh, yes, ok.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +8
-0+#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */ +static void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +{ +if (likely (audit_mark)) +fsnotify_get_mark (&audit_mark->mark); +} + +static void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 76
Quoted 5 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +5
-0+{ +if (likely (audit_mark)) +fsnotify_put_mark (&audit_mark->mark); +} +#endif If this code is '#if 0' let's dump it. We need it or we don't, keeping it around as dead weight is dangerous.
Agreed. Missed that.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +6
-0+char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +return mark->path; +} + +int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino,
dev_tdev) +{
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 88
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +4
-0+if (mark->ino == (unsigned long )-1 ) +return 0 ; +return (mark->ino == ino) && (mark->dev == dev); +}It seems like there should be a #define for -1 inodes, did you check? I generally hate magic numbers like this because I'm pretty stupid and tend to forget their meaning over time ....
I found nothing obvious, but it does surprise me a bit too...
Quoted 3 lines
Also, at some point we should make (or find?) some generic inode comparison function/macro. I'm amazed at home many times I see (
i_foo== ino &&i_dev== dev).
It would make sense if there were two structs that both included ino and dev members to call a funciton/macro with pointers to the two structs, or even one struct and an ino dev tuple, but when the four are discreet, it starts to lose its utility...
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 17 lines
+struct
audit_fsnotify_mark*audit_alloc_mark(structaudit_krule*krule, char *pathname, int len) +{kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +15
-0+struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +struct path path; +struct dentry *dentry; +struct inode *inode; +unsigned long ino; +char *local_pathname; +dev_t dev; +int ret; + +if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) +return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); + + dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); +if (IS_ERR (dentry)) +return (void *)dentry;/* returning an error */ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 116
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +10
-0+ inode = path.dentry->d_inode; +mutex_unlock (&inode->i_mutex); + +if (!dentry->d_inode) { + ino = (unsigned long )-1 ; + dev = (unsigned )-1 ; + }else { + dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; + }My comments on the ino and dev variables from the other patch apply here.
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 121
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +4
-0+ audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!local_pathname) + goto out;Why not just
kstrdup()intoaudit_mark->pathdirectly? I don't get the fascination with local variables. Also, why bother with the strdup if theaudit_markmalloc is going to fail?
Yeah, I didn't like it either, that's why 4/4 exists...
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 24 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +15
-0+ audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { +kfree (local_pathname); + audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + goto out; + } + +fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); + audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; + audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->ino = ino; + audit_mark->dev = dev; + audit_mark->rule = krule; + + ret = fsnotify_add_mark(&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_group, inode,NULL, true); + if (ret < 0) {
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +8
-0+audit_mark_free (audit_mark); + audit_mark =ERR_PTR (ret); + } +out: +dput (dentry); +path_put (&path); +return audit_mark; +}...
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
+static void
audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark, char *op)
+{That is a lot of letters ... who about
audit_mark_log_change()?
I used audit_watch_log_rule_change() and audit_tree_log_remove_rule() as references... I think it is fine.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +11
-0+/* Update mark data in audit rules based on fsnotify events. */ +static int audit_mark_handle_event (struct fsnotify_group *group, +struct inode *to_tell, +struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark, +struct fsnotify_mark *vfsmount_mark, +u32 mask,void *data,int data_type, +const unsigned char *dname,u32 cookie) +{ +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +struct inode *inode =NULL ; +
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 216
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +3
-0+ audit_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct audit_fsnotify_mark, mark); + +BUG_ON (group != audit_fsnotify_group);What happens when
BUG_ON()is compiled out? Let's back this up with some normal error checking if you think this is a real concern. If it isn't a real concern, why do we have aBUG_ON()? This doesn't strike me as something that is going to be a real problem.
It should not be, if the code is correct. I have no reason to believe otherwise since we are the only callers and no case should trigger it.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +6
-0+switch (data_type) { +case (FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH ): + inode = ((struct path *)data)->dentry->d_inode; +break ; +case (FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE ): + inode = (struct inode *)data;
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c line 228
Quoted 5 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +5
-0+break ; +default : +BUG (); +return 0 ; + };We can do better than
BUG()in the default catch-all above. Maybe aprink(KERN_ERR ...)?
Oh dang, missed this one in the patchsets I just sent out.
This too was a development debug aid. I don't expect this condition to be hit, but pr_err(...) would work fine here.
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 25 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-1@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ error: }/* Remove an existing rule from filterlist. */ -static inline int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) +int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) {struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree;@@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) int ret = 0;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL int dont_count =0 ; +int match =audit_match_signal (entry);/* If either of these, don't count towards total */ if (entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_USER ||@@ -1017,7 +1018,7 @@ static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) if (!dont_count) audit_n_rules--;
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) · line 1024
Quoted 5 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-1-if (!audit_match_signal (entry)) +if (!match) audit_signals--;#endif mutex_unlock (&audit_filter_mutex);Is the bit above worthy of it's own bugfix patch independent of this fsnotify implementation, or is it only an issue with this new fsnotify code?
I've split it out and added a note to the cover letter. Er, I should have included the removal of "static inline" in that split out patch...
Quoted 1 line
paul moore
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
PATCH v6 3/4 audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsInstead of just hard coding the ino and dev of the executable we care about at the moment the rule is inserted into the kernel, use the new audit_fsnotify infrastructure. This means that if the inode in question is unlinked and creat'd (aka updated) the rule will just continue to work.
RGB: Clean up exe with similar interface as watch and tree.
RGB: Clean up audit exe mark just before audit_free_rule() rather than in it to avoid mutex in software interrupt context.
--- include/linux/audit.h | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 33 +++--------------- kernel/audit_exe.c | 87 +++++++------------------------------------------ kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 + kernel/audit_watch.c | 4 ++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 28 +++++++++++---- 6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
include/linux/audit.h +1 -1
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct audit_krule {struct audit_field *inode_f;/* quick access to an inode field */ struct audit_watch *watch;/* associated watch */ struct audit_tree *tree;/* associated watched tree */ -struct audit_exe *exe; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe;struct list_head rlist;/* entry in audit_{watch,tree}.rules list */ struct list_head list;/* for AUDIT_LIST* purposes only */ u64 prio;
kernel/audit.h +6 -27
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ;struct audit_fsnotify_mark ; -struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;
@@ -279,11 +278,8 @@ extern void audit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);extern void audit_remove_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule);extern int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); -extern int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op); -extern void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule); -extern char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe);extern int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old); -extern int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe); +extern int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);#else #define audit_put_watch (w) {}
@@ -302,36 +298,19 @@ static inline char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) }#define audit_remove_mark (m) BUG()#define audit_remove_mark_rule (k) BUG() -static inline int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) -{ -return -EINVAL ; -} -static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) {BUG (); -return "" ; +return -EINVAL ; } +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) {BUG (); - return -EINVAL -} -static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; +return -EINVAL ; } +#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE
kernel/audit_exe.c +12 -75
105 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/audit_tree.c +2 -0
@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static void kill_rules(struct audit_tree *tree)if (rule->tree) {/* not a half-baked one */ audit_tree_log_remove_rule (rule); +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe); rule->tree =NULL ;list_del_rcu (&entry->list);list_del (&entry->rule.list);
kernel/audit_watch.c +4 -0
@@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ static void audit_update_watch(struct audit_parent *parent,list_replace (&oentry->rule.list, &nentry->rule.list); } +if (oentry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (oentry->rule.exe);audit_watch_log_rule_change (r, owatch,"updated_rules" );
@@ -342,6 +344,8 @@ static void audit_remove_parent_watches(struct audit_parent *parent)list_for_each_entry_safe (r, nextr, &w->rules, rlist) { e = container_of(r, struct audit_entry, rule);audit_watch_log_rule_change (r, w,"remove_rule" ); +if (e->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (e->rule.exe);list_del (&r->rlist);list_del (&r->list);list_del_rcu (&e->list);
kernel/auditfilter.c +20 -8
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,size_t remain = datasz -sizeof (struct audit_rule_data );int i;char *str; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; entry =audit_to_entry_common (data);if (IS_ERR (entry))
@@ -557,11 +558,13 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, } entry->rule.buflen += f->val; - err =audit_make_exe_rule (&entry->rule, str, f->val, f->op); -if (err) { -kfree (str); + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val); +kfree (str); +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { + err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } + entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; } }
@@ -575,6 +578,8 @@ exit_nofree: exit_free:if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);/* that's the template one */ audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }
@@ -642,7 +647,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule)case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : data->buflen += data->values[i] = -audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_exe_path (krule->exe)); +audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_mark_path (krule->exe));break ;case AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET :if (krule->pflags &AUDIT_LOGINUID_LEGACY && !f->val) {
@@ -710,8 +715,8 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a, struct audit_krule *b)case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN :/* both paths exist based on above type compare */ -if (strcmp (audit_exe_path (a->exe), -audit_exe_path (b->exe))) +if (strcmp (audit_mark_path (a->exe), +audit_mark_path (b->exe)))return 1 ;break ;case AUDIT_UID :
@@ -842,6 +847,8 @@ struct audit_entry *audit_dupe_rule(struct audit_krule *old)break ; }if (err) { +if (new->exe) +audit_remove_mark (new->exe);audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }
@@ -1008,7 +1015,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)audit_remove_tree_rule (&e->rule);if (e->rule.exe) -audit_remove_exe_rule (&e->rule); +audit_remove_mark_rule (&e->rule);list_del_rcu (&e->list);list_del (&e->rule.list);
@@ -1113,8 +1120,11 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, __u32 portid, int seq, void *data,WARN_ON (1 ); } -if (err || type ==AUDIT_DEL_RULE ) +if (err || type ==AUDIT_DEL_RULE ) { +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);audit_free_rule (entry); + }return err; }
@@ -1406,6 +1416,8 @@ static int update_lsm_rule(struct audit_krule *r)return 0 ; nentry =audit_dupe_rule (r); +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);if (IS_ERR (nentry)) {/* save the first error encountered for the * return value */
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Re: [PATCH V6 3/4] audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
Quoted 6 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Instead of just hard coding the ino and dev of the executable we care about at the moment the rule is inserted into the kernel, use the new
audit_fsnotifyinfrastructure. This means that if the inode in question is unlinked and creat'd (aka updated) the rule will just continue to work.
Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>RGB: Clean up exe with similar interface as watch and tree.
RGB: Clean up audit exe mark just beforeaudit_free_rule()rather than in it to avoid mutex in software interrupt context.Based-on-code-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Ah, good, the fix that patch 1/4 was hoping for is finally happening :)
Since we're not getting paid by the number of patches in a patch set, I think I would prefer to see the fsnotify implementation as the first patch and the original crappy exe filter patch merged with this fixup patch.
No in depth comments on this particular patch, I skimmed it but frankly it makes much more sense to review this patch once you've merged the two.
Quoted 329 lines
include/linux/audit.h +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct audit_krule {struct audit_field *inode_f;/* quick access to an inode field */ struct audit_watch *watch;/* associated watch */ struct audit_tree *tree;/* associated watched tree */ -struct audit_exe *exe; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe;struct list_head rlist;/* entry in audit_{watch,tree}.rules list */ struct list_head list;/* for AUDIT_LIST* purposes only */ u64 prio;kernel/audit.h +0
-1@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ;struct audit_fsnotify_mark ; -struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;@@ -279,11 +278,8 @@ extern void audit_remove_mark(struct
audit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark); extern voidaudit_remove_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);
extern int audit_mark_compare(structaudit_fsnotify_mark*mark, unsigned
long ino,dev_tdev);-extern int
audit_make_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, int len, u32 op); -extern voidaudit_remove_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);
-extern char *audit_exe_path(structaudit_exe*exe);
extern int audit_dupe_exe(structaudit_krule*new, structaudit_krule
*old); -extern intaudit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_exe *exe); +extern intaudit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);#else
#defineaudit_put_watch(w){}kernel/audit.h +5
-19@@ -302,36 +298,19 @@ static inline char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) }#define audit_remove_mark (m) BUG()#define audit_remove_mark_rule (k) BUG() -static inline int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname, int len, u32 op) -{ -return -EINVAL ; -} -static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +static inline int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) {BUG (); -return "" ; +return -EINVAL ; } +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) {BUG (); - return -EINVAL -} -static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; +return -EINVAL ; } +#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE kernel/audit_exe.c +12
-74@@ -17,93 +17,30 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/audit.h> -#include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include "audit.h" -struct audit_exe { -char *pathname; -unsigned long ino; -dev_t dev; -}; - -/* Translate a watch string to kernel respresentation. */ -int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len, u32 op) -{ -struct audit_exe *exe; -struct path path; -struct dentry *dentry; -unsigned long ino; -dev_t dev; - -if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) -return -EINVAL ; - - dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); -if (IS_ERR (dentry)) -return PTR_ERR (dentry); -mutex_unlock (&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); - -if (!dentry->d_inode) -return -ENOENT ; - dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; - ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; -dput (dentry); - - exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!exe) -return -ENOMEM ; - exe->ino = ino; - exe->dev = dev; - exe->pathname = pathname; - krule->exe = exe; - -return 0 ; -} - -void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) -{ -struct audit_exe *exe; - - exe = krule->exe; - krule->exe =NULL ; -kfree (exe->pathname); -kfree (exe); -} - -char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) -{ -return exe->pathname; -} -int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) { -struct audit_exe *exe; - - exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!exe) -return -ENOMEM ; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +char *pathname; - exe->pathname =kstrdup (old->exe->pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!exe->pathname) { -kfree (exe); -return -ENOMEM ; - } + pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); - exe->ino = old->exe->ino; - exe->dev = old->exe->dev; - new->exe = exe; + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (new, pathname,strlen (pathname)); +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ; } -int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) { -if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino != exe->ino) -return 0 ; -if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev != exe->dev) -return 0 ; -return 1 ; +unsigned long ino = tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino; +dev_t dev = tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + +return audit_mark_compare (mark, ino, dev); }kernel/audit_tree.c +2
-0@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static void kill_rules(struct audit_tree *tree)if (rule->tree) {/* not a half-baked one */ audit_tree_log_remove_rule (rule); +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe); rule->tree =NULL ;list_del_rcu (&entry->list);list_del (&entry->rule.list);kernel/audit_watch.c +4
-0@@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ static void audit_update_watch(struct audit_parent *parent,list_replace (&oentry->rule.list, &nentry->rule.list); } +if (oentry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (oentry->rule.exe);audit_watch_log_rule_change (r, owatch,"updated_rules" );@@ -342,6 +344,8 @@ static void audit_remove_parent_watches(struct audit_parent *parent) list_for_each_entry_safe(r, nextr, &w->rules, rlist) { e = container_of(r, struct audit_entry, rule);audit_watch_log_rule_change (r, w,"remove_rule" ); +if (e->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (e->rule.exe);list_del (&r->rlist);list_del (&r->list);kernel/audit_watch.c +0
-0list_del_rcu (&e->list);kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct
audit_rule_data*data,size_tremain = datasz -sizeof(struct audit_rule_data);kernel/auditfilter.c +9
-4int i;char *str; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; entry =audit_to_entry_common (data);if (IS_ERR (entry))@@ -557,11 +558,13 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, } entry->rule.buflen += f->val; - err =audit_make_exe_rule (&entry->rule, str, f->val, f->op); -if (err) { -kfree (str); + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val); +kfree (str); +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { + err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } + entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; } }@@ -575,6 +578,8 @@ exit_nofree: exit_free:if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);/* that's the template one */ audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -642,7 +647,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule) case AUDIT_EXE:case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : data->buflen += data->values[i] = -audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_exe_path (krule->exe)); +audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_mark_path (krule->exe));break ;case AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET :if (krule->pflags &AUDIT_LOGINUID_LEGACY && !f->val) {@@ -710,8 +715,8 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a,struct
audit_krule*b) caseAUDIT_EXE:kernel/auditfilter.c +11
-4case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN :/* both paths exist based on above type compare */ -if (strcmp (audit_exe_path (a->exe), -audit_exe_path (b->exe))) +if (strcmp (audit_mark_path (a->exe), +audit_mark_path (b->exe)))return 1 ;break ;case AUDIT_UID :@@ -842,6 +847,8 @@ struct audit_entry *audit_dupe_rule(struct audit_krule *old) break; }if (err) { +if (new->exe) +audit_remove_mark (new->exe);audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -1008,7 +1015,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)audit_remove_tree_rule (&e->rule);if (e->rule.exe) -audit_remove_exe_rule (&e->rule); +audit_remove_mark_rule (&e->rule);list_del_rcu (&e->list);list_del (&e->rule.list);@@ -1113,8 +1120,11 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, __u32 portid, int seq, void *data,WARN_ON (1 ); } -if (err || type ==AUDIT_DEL_RULE ) +if (err || type ==AUDIT_DEL_RULE ) { +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);audit_free_rule (entry); + }return err; }@@ -1406,6 +1416,8 @@ static int update_lsm_rule(struct audit_krule *r)return 0 ; nentry =audit_dupe_rule (r); +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);if (IS_ERR (nentry)) {/* save the first error encountered for the * return value */
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 3/4] audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
Quoted 13 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 12 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Instead of just hard coding the ino and dev of the executable we care about at the moment the rule is inserted into the kernel, use the new
audit_fsnotifyinfrastructure. This means that if the inode in question is unlinked and creat'd (aka updated) the rule will just continue to work.Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>RGB: Clean up exe with similar interface as watch and tree.
RGB: Clean up audit exe mark just beforeaudit_free_rule()rather than in it to avoid mutex in software interrupt context.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Based-on-code-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>Ah, good, the fix that patch 1/4 was hoping for is finally happening :)
Since we're not getting paid by the number of patches in a patch set, I think I would prefer to see the fsnotify implementation as the first patch and the original crappy exe filter patch merged with this fixup patch.
Ah, fair enough. Yeah, I'll do that.
Quoted 326 lines
No in depth comments on this particular patch, I skimmed it but frankly it makes much more sense to review this patch once you've merged the two.
Quoted 323 lines
include/linux/audit.h +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct audit_krule {struct audit_field *inode_f;/* quick access to an inode field */ struct audit_watch *watch;/* associated watch */ struct audit_tree *tree;/* associated watched tree */ -struct audit_exe *exe; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe;struct list_head rlist;/* entry in audit_{watch,tree}.rules list */ struct list_head list;/* for AUDIT_LIST* purposes only */ u64 prio;kernel/audit.h +0
-1@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ;struct audit_fsnotify_mark ; -struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;@@ -279,11 +278,8 @@ extern void audit_remove_mark(struct
audit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark); extern voidaudit_remove_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);
extern int audit_mark_compare(structaudit_fsnotify_mark*mark, unsigned
long ino,dev_tdev);-extern int
audit_make_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, int len, u32 op); -extern voidaudit_remove_exe_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);
-extern char *audit_exe_path(structaudit_exe*exe);
extern int audit_dupe_exe(structaudit_krule*new, structaudit_krule
*old); -extern intaudit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_exe *exe); +extern intaudit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);#else
#defineaudit_put_watch(w){}kernel/audit.h +5
-19@@ -302,36 +298,19 @@ static inline char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) }#define audit_remove_mark (m) BUG()#define audit_remove_mark_rule (k) BUG() -static inline int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname, int len, u32 op) -{ -return -EINVAL ; -} -static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) +static inline int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) {BUG (); -return "" ; +return -EINVAL ; } +static inline int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) {BUG (); - return -EINVAL -} -static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) -{ -BUG (); -return 0 ; +return -EINVAL ; } +#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE kernel/audit_exe.c +12
-74@@ -17,93 +17,30 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/audit.h> -#include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include "audit.h" -struct audit_exe { -char *pathname; -unsigned long ino; -dev_t dev; -}; - -/* Translate a watch string to kernel respresentation. */ -int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len, u32 op) -{ -struct audit_exe *exe; -struct path path; -struct dentry *dentry; -unsigned long ino; -dev_t dev; - -if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || pathname[len-1 ] =='/' ) -return -EINVAL ; - - dentry =kern_path_locked (pathname, &path); -if (IS_ERR (dentry)) -return PTR_ERR (dentry); -mutex_unlock (&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); - -if (!dentry->d_inode) -return -ENOENT ; - dev = dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_dev; - ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; -dput (dentry); - - exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!exe) -return -ENOMEM ; - exe->ino = ino; - exe->dev = dev; - exe->pathname = pathname; - krule->exe = exe; - -return 0 ; -} - -void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) -{ -struct audit_exe *exe; - - exe = krule->exe; - krule->exe =NULL ; -kfree (exe->pathname); -kfree (exe); -} - -char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) -{ -return exe->pathname; -} -int audit_dupe_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) { -struct audit_exe *exe; - - exe =kmalloc (sizeof (*exe),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!exe) -return -ENOMEM ; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +char *pathname; - exe->pathname =kstrdup (old->exe->pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!exe->pathname) { -kfree (exe); -return -ENOMEM ; - } + pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); - exe->ino = old->exe->ino; - exe->dev = old->exe->dev; - new->exe = exe; + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (new, pathname,strlen (pathname)); +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ; } -int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) { -if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino != exe->ino) -return 0 ; -if (tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev != exe->dev) -return 0 ; -return 1 ; +unsigned long ino = tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino; +dev_t dev = tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + +return audit_mark_compare (mark, ino, dev); }kernel/audit_tree.c +2
-0@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static void kill_rules(struct audit_tree *tree)if (rule->tree) {/* not a half-baked one */ audit_tree_log_remove_rule (rule); +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe); rule->tree =NULL ;list_del_rcu (&entry->list);list_del (&entry->rule.list);kernel/audit_watch.c +4
-0@@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ static void audit_update_watch(struct audit_parent *parent,list_replace (&oentry->rule.list, &nentry->rule.list); } +if (oentry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (oentry->rule.exe);audit_watch_log_rule_change (r, owatch,"updated_rules" );@@ -342,6 +344,8 @@ static void audit_remove_parent_watches(struct audit_parent *parent) list_for_each_entry_safe(r, nextr, &w->rules, rlist) { e = container_of(r, struct audit_entry, rule);audit_watch_log_rule_change (r, w,"remove_rule" ); +if (e->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (e->rule.exe);list_del (&r->rlist);list_del (&r->list);kernel/audit_watch.c +0
-0list_del_rcu (&e->list);kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct
audit_rule_data*data,size_tremain = datasz -sizeof(struct audit_rule_data);kernel/auditfilter.c +9
-4int i;char *str; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; entry =audit_to_entry_common (data);if (IS_ERR (entry))@@ -557,11 +558,13 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, } entry->rule.buflen += f->val; - err =audit_make_exe_rule (&entry->rule, str, f->val, f->op); -if (err) { -kfree (str); + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val); +kfree (str); +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { + err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } + entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; } }@@ -575,6 +578,8 @@ exit_nofree: exit_free:if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);/* that's the template one */ audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -642,7 +647,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule) case AUDIT_EXE:case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : data->buflen += data->values[i] = -audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_exe_path (krule->exe)); +audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_mark_path (krule->exe));break ;case AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET :if (krule->pflags &AUDIT_LOGINUID_LEGACY && !f->val) {@@ -710,8 +715,8 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a,struct
audit_krule*b) caseAUDIT_EXE:kernel/auditfilter.c +9
-4case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN :/* both paths exist based on above type compare */ -if (strcmp (audit_exe_path (a->exe), -audit_exe_path (b->exe))) +if (strcmp (audit_mark_path (a->exe), +audit_mark_path (b->exe)))return 1 ;break ;case AUDIT_UID :@@ -842,6 +847,8 @@ struct audit_entry *audit_dupe_rule(struct audit_krule *old) break; }if (err) { +if (new->exe) +audit_remove_mark (new->exe);audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -1008,7 +1015,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)audit_remove_tree_rule (&e->rule);if (e->rule.exe) -audit_remove_exe_rule (&e->rule); +audit_remove_mark_rule (&e->rule);list_del_rcu (&e->list);list_del (&e->rule.list);@@ -1113,8 +1120,11 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, __u32 portid, int seq, void *data,WARN_ON (1 ); } -if (err || type ==AUDIT_DEL_RULE ) +if (err || type ==AUDIT_DEL_RULE ) { +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);audit_free_rule (entry); + }return err; }@@ -1406,6 +1416,8 @@ static int update_lsm_rule(struct audit_krule *r)return 0 ;
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0nentry =audit_dupe_rule (r); +if (entry->rule.exe) +audit_remove_mark (entry->rule.exe);if (IS_ERR (nentry)) {/* save the first error encountered for the * return value */ Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
PATCH v6 4/4 audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsMake this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.
--- kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
kernel/audit_exe.c +6 -2
@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old)struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark;char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname =kstrdup (audit_mark_path (old->exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (new, pathname,strlen (pathname)); -if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1 -8
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pastruct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;dev_t dev;int ret;
@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;
kernel/auditfilter.c +1 -1
@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str);if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 9 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.
Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>--- kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
Quoted 71 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +6
-2@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old) struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark;char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname =kstrdup (audit_mark_path (old->exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (new, pathname,strlen (pathname)); -if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-8@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-1@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str);if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 4 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 3 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>--- kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 64 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +6
-2@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old) struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark;char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname =kstrdup (audit_mark_path (old->exe),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (new, pathname,strlen (pathname)); -if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-8@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val;
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-1audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str);if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 13 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 12 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 10 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.
Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>---
kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Like I mentioned in one of the patches, I'm not really a fan of how audit handles the alloc/free'ing of some things, but I think it is more important to be consistent within audit itself.
At some point we'll fix this, but it doesn't have to be now. Go ahead and merge the patch with the others.
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Eric Paris
maintainerRe: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsI have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)
-Eric
Quoted 101 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 12 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 10 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra
string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>--- kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Quoted 80 lines
Quoted 79 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +0
-0@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new,struct
audit_krule*old) structaudit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark;kernel/audit_exe.c +1
-1char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname = kstrdup(audit_mark_path(old->exe),
GFP_KERNEL);kernel/audit_exe.c +2
-0+if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(new, pathname,strlen(pathname));
kernel/audit_exe.c +3
-1-if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-8@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-0audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-2@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(&entry ->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str); if (IS_ERR(audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Paris
I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)
It's been a long day, and maybe I'm missing something here, but this patch only affects the new code, no?
Quoted 126 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 125 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 8 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 7 lines
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra
string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>---
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Quoted 103 lines
Quoted 103 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +0
-0@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new,struct
audit_krule*old) structaudit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark;kernel/audit_exe.c +1
-1char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname = kstrdup(audit_mark_path(old->exe),
GFP_KERNEL);kernel/audit_exe.c +2
-0+if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(new, pathname,strlen(pathname));
kernel/audit_exe.c +3
-1-if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-1@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-6dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark(&audit_mark->mark,
audit_fsnotify_free_mark);kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-1audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-2@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(&entry ->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str); if (IS_ERR(audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 9 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Paris
I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)It's been a long day, and maybe I'm missing something here, but this patch only affects the new code, no?
Correct. However, it aims to follow the approach used in watch and tree code, rather than making yet another copy.
Quoted 118 lines
Quoted 118 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 117 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 8 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 7 lines
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra
string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>---
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Quoted 95 lines
Quoted 95 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +0
-0@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new,struct
audit_krule*old) structaudit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark;kernel/audit_exe.c +1
-1char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname = kstrdup(audit_mark_path(old->exe),
GFP_KERNEL);kernel/audit_exe.c +2
-0+if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(new, pathname,strlen(pathname));
kernel/audit_exe.c +3
-1-if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-1@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-6dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark(&audit_mark->mark,
audit_fsnotify_free_mark);kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-1audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-2@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(&entry ->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str);
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 8 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 7 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Paris
I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
It's been a long day, and maybe I'm missing something here, but this patch only affects the new code, no?
Correct. However, it aims to follow the approach used in watch and tree code, rather than making yet another copy.
I guess I still don't understand why this is separate - either I'm missing something painfully obvious or we're just not on the same page ...? Oh well, this patch isn't really a bugfix or something that makes the feature functionally complete so I suppose keeping it as a separate patch is harmless.
In general, when adding new functionality I like to see individual patches that are functionally complete, hence my request to merge patch 1/4 and 3/4; the only solid reason I can think of for not doing so is due to size constraints on the mailing list (and reviewers minds).
Quoted 134 lines
Quoted 118 lines
Quoted 118 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 117 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 8 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 7 lines
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra
string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>---
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Quoted 95 lines
Quoted 95 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +0
-0@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new,struct
audit_krule*old) structaudit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark;kernel/audit_exe.c +1
-1char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname = kstrdup(audit_mark_path(old->exe),
GFP_KERNEL);kernel/audit_exe.c +2
-0+if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(new, pathname,strlen(pathname));
kernel/audit_exe.c +3
-1-if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-1@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-6dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark(&audit_mark->mark,
audit_fsnotify_free_mark);kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-1audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-2@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(&entry ->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str);Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, · line 566
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
In reply to Eric ParisQuoted 5 lines · Eric Paris
I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)
So maybe even fixing this before applying the audit exe stuff has merit...
Quoted 104 lines
-Eric
Quoted 101 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 12 lines · Paul Moore
Quoted 10 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key, avoiding the extra
string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.Signed-off-by Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>--- kernel/audit_exe.c | 8 ++++++-- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 9 +-------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its own patch.
I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and accepted rather than mix it in.
I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
Quoted 80 lines
Quoted 79 lines
kernel/audit_exe.c +0
-0@@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new,struct
audit_krule*old) structaudit_fsnotify_mark*audit_mark;kernel/audit_exe.c +1
-1char *pathname; - pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); + pathname = kstrdup(audit_mark_path(old->exe),
GFP_KERNEL);kernel/audit_exe.c +2
-0+if (!pathname) +return -ENOMEM ; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(new, pathname,strlen(pathname));
kernel/audit_exe.c +3
-1-if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (pathname);return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); + } new->exe = audit_mark;return 0 ;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-8@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;dev_t dev;int ret;@@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); goto out; }fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_fsnotify_free_mark); audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino;kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0
-0audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-2@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(&entry ->rule, str, f->val); -kfree (str); if (IS_ERR(audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
Quoted 9 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Paris
I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)So maybe even fixing this before applying the audit exe stuff has merit...
No, let's get the exe filter stuff in now just so I can get all you guys off my back about it :)
The refcnt stuff is almost surely going to get messy and I would just assume not deal with that right now since it appears to be working. We have other stuff we need to fix first.
Signature · 2 lines
paul moore security @ redhat
Quoted 10 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Please see the accompanying userspace patchset:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2015-July/thread.html
[[PATCH V2] 0/2] Log on the future execution of a path
The userspace interface is not expected to change appreciably unless something important has been overlooked. Setting and deleting rules works as expected.If the path does not exist at rule creation time, it will be re-evaluated every time there is a change to the parent directory at which point the change in device and inode will be noted.
Thanks for doing this. Its a much needed feature.
In looking over it...does this add an AUDIT_VERSION_ define and use it in the feature mask so that I can tell what kernels support this? I might have missed it, but I can't find one.
Thanks,
-Steve
Quoted 117 lines
Here's a sample run:
Test for addition, trigger and deletion of tree executable rule:# auditctl -a always,exit -S all -F dir=/tmp -F exe=/usr/bin/touch -F key=exetest_tree ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1436629310.720:44711): auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op="add_rule" key="exetest_tree" list=4 res=1 ----# /usr/bin/touch /tmp/test ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): proctitle=2F7573722F62696E2F746F756368002F746D702F74657374 type=PATH msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): item=1 name="/tmp/test" inode=166932 dev=00:24 mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 nametype=CREATE type=PATH msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): item=0 name="/tmp/" inode=11525 dev=00:24 mode=041777 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 nametype=PARENT type=CWD msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): cwd="/root" type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=yes exit=3 a0=7ffdee2f9e27 a1=941 a2=1b6 a3=691 items=2 ppid=17655 pid=17762 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=ttyS0 ses=1 comm="touch" exe="/usr/bin/touch" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key="exetest_tree" ----# auditctl -d always,exit -S all -F dir=/tmp -F exe=/usr/bin/touch -F key=exetest_tree ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1436629310.839:44713): auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op="remove_rule" key="exetest_tree" list=4 res=1 ----Revision history:
v6: Explicitly declare prototypes as external.
Renameaudit_dup_exe()toaudit_dupe_exe()consistent with rule, watch,lsm_field. Rebased on v4.1.
Renameaudit_remove_mark_rule()called fromaudit_mark_handle_event()toaudit_autoremove_mark_rule()to avoid confusion with
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule() usage.
Addaudit_remove_mark_rule()to provide similar interface as
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule().
Simplify stubs to defines.
Renameaudit_free_fsnotify_mark()toaudit_fsnotify_free_mark()in
keeping with the naming convention ofinotify_free_mark(),dnotify_free_mark(),fanotify_free_mark(),audit_watch_free_mark().
Return-ENOMEMrather than null in case of memory allocation failure foraudit_markinaudit_alloc_mark().
Renameaudit_free_mark()toaudit_mark_free()to avoid association with
{i,d,fa}notify_free_mark() andaudit_watch_free_mark().
Clean up exe with similar interface as watch and tree.
Clean up audit exe mark just beforeaudit_free_rule()rather than in it
to avoid mutex in software interrupt context.
Fixed bug inaudit_dupe_exe()that returned error rather than valid
pointer.v5: Revert patch "Let
audit_free_rule()take care of calling
audit_remove_mark()." since it caused a group mark deadlock.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-October/msg00024.htmlv4: Re-order and squash down fixups
Fixaudit_dup_exe()to copy pathname string before callingaudit_alloc_mark().
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00065.htmlv3: Rationalize and rename some function names and clean up get/put and free code. Rename several "watch" references to "mark".
Renameaudit_remove_rule()toaudit_remove_mark_rule().
Letaudit_free_rule()take care of callingaudit_remove_mark(). Putaudit_alloc_mark()arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode.
Move the access to the entry foraudit_match_signal()to the beginning of the function in case the entry found is the same one passed in. This will enable it to be used byaudit_remove_mark_rule().https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-July/msg00000.htmlv2: Misguided attempt to add in
audit_exesimilar to watcheshttps://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-June/msg00066.htmlv1.5: eparis' switch to fsnotify
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00046.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00066.htmlv1: Change to path interface instead of inode
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00017.htmlv0: Peter Moodie's original patches
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2012-August/msg00033.htmlFuture step:
Get full-path notify working.Eric Paris (1):
audit: implement audit by executableRichard Guy Briggs (3):
audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: convertaudit_exetoaudit_fsnotify
audit: avoid double copying theaudit_exepath stringinclude/linux/audit.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 33 ++++++ kernel/audit_exe.c | 50 +++++++++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 + kernel/audit_watch.c | 4 + kernel/auditfilter.c | 63 +++++++++++- kernel/auditsc.c | 16 +++ 10 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_exe.c create mode 100644 kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
Quoted 12 lines · Steve Grubb
Quoted 10 lines · Richard Guy Briggs
Please see the accompanying userspace patchset:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2015-July/thread.html
[[PATCH V2] 0/2] Log on the future execution of a path
The userspace interface is not expected to change appreciably unless something important has been overlooked. Setting and deleting rules works as expected.If the path does not exist at rule creation time, it will be re-evaluated every time there is a change to the parent directory at which point the change in device and inode will be noted.
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks for doing this. Its a much needed feature.
In looking over it...does this add an
AUDIT_VERSION_define and use it in the feature mask so that I can tell what kernels support this? I might have missed it, but I can't find one.
Ah, thanks for catching that! I thought about it several times and even backported the infrastructure. :-P
Quoted 120 lines
-Steve
Quoted 117 lines
Here's a sample run:
Test for addition, trigger and deletion of tree executable rule:# auditctl -a always,exit -S all -F dir=/tmp -F exe=/usr/bin/touch -F key=exetest_tree ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1436629310.720:44711): auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op="add_rule" key="exetest_tree" list=4 res=1 ----# /usr/bin/touch /tmp/test ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): proctitle=2F7573722F62696E2F746F756368002F746D702F74657374 type=PATH msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): item=1 name="/tmp/test" inode=166932 dev=00:24 mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 nametype=CREATE type=PATH msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): item=0 name="/tmp/" inode=11525 dev=00:24 mode=041777 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 nametype=PARENT type=CWD msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): cwd="/root" type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1436629310.757:44712): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=yes exit=3 a0=7ffdee2f9e27 a1=941 a2=1b6 a3=691 items=2 ppid=17655 pid=17762 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=ttyS0 ses=1 comm="touch" exe="/usr/bin/touch" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key="exetest_tree" ----# auditctl -d always,exit -S all -F dir=/tmp -F exe=/usr/bin/touch -F key=exetest_tree ---- time->Sat Jul 11 10:41:50 2015 type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1436629310.839:44713): auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op="remove_rule" key="exetest_tree" list=4 res=1 ----Revision history:
v6: Explicitly declare prototypes as external.
Renameaudit_dup_exe()toaudit_dupe_exe()consistent with rule, watch,lsm_field. Rebased on v4.1.
Renameaudit_remove_mark_rule()called fromaudit_mark_handle_event()toaudit_autoremove_mark_rule()to avoid confusion with
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule() usage.
Addaudit_remove_mark_rule()to provide similar interface as
audit_remove_{watch,tree}_rule().
Simplify stubs to defines.
Renameaudit_free_fsnotify_mark()toaudit_fsnotify_free_mark()in
keeping with the naming convention ofinotify_free_mark(),dnotify_free_mark(),fanotify_free_mark(),audit_watch_free_mark().
Return-ENOMEMrather than null in case of memory allocation failure foraudit_markinaudit_alloc_mark().
Renameaudit_free_mark()toaudit_mark_free()to avoid association with
{i,d,fa}notify_free_mark() andaudit_watch_free_mark().
Clean up exe with similar interface as watch and tree.
Clean up audit exe mark just beforeaudit_free_rule()rather than in it
to avoid mutex in software interrupt context.
Fixed bug inaudit_dupe_exe()that returned error rather than valid
pointer.v5: Revert patch "Let
audit_free_rule()take care of calling
audit_remove_mark()." since it caused a group mark deadlock.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-October/msg00024.htmlv4: Re-order and squash down fixups
Fixaudit_dup_exe()to copy pathname string before callingaudit_alloc_mark().
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00065.htmlv3: Rationalize and rename some function names and clean up get/put and free code. Rename several "watch" references to "mark".
Renameaudit_remove_rule()toaudit_remove_mark_rule().
Letaudit_free_rule()take care of callingaudit_remove_mark(). Putaudit_alloc_mark()arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode.
Move the access to the entry foraudit_match_signal()to the beginning of the function in case the entry found is the same one passed in. This will enable it to be used byaudit_remove_mark_rule().https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-July/msg00000.htmlv2: Misguided attempt to add in
audit_exesimilar to watcheshttps://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-June/msg00066.htmlv1.5: eparis' switch to fsnotify
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00046.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00066.htmlv1: Change to path interface instead of inode
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00017.htmlv0: Peter Moodie's original patches
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2012-August/msg00033.htmlFuture step:
Get full-path notify working.Eric Paris (1):
audit: implement audit by executableRichard Guy Briggs (3):
audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: convertaudit_exetoaudit_fsnotify
audit: avoid double copying theaudit_exepath stringinclude/linux/audit.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 33 ++++++ kernel/audit_exe.c | 50 +++++++++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 + kernel/audit_watch.c | 4 + kernel/auditfilter.c | 63 +++++++++++- kernel/auditsc.c | 16 +++ 10 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_exe.c create mode 100644 kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545