Skip to contentSkip to conversation

gpio: driver for the RPi3 GPIO expander

PATCH Superseded Baruch Siach 7 participants 16 messages Jan 11, 2018 – Jan 18, 2018 2 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (4)

v2 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v2 cover gpio: driver for the RPi3 GPIO expander

The Raspberry Pi 3 has a GPIO expander that controls, among others, the activity LED, and the camera connector GPIOs. The GPIO expander on an I2C bus that is not directly controlled from the ARM core. The VC4 firmware controls the I2C bus, and allows the ARM core to set/get GPIO settings over its mailbox interface.

This series adds support for the RPi3 expander.

The driver is ported from the downstream kernel at
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/, branch rpi-4.9.y.

Changes in v2:

* Driver renamed to gpio-raspberrypi-exp
* Compatible string renamed to "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio"
* Firmware error check
* Smaller tweaks listed in individual patches

Baruch Siach (3):
ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream
dt-bindings: gpio: add raspberry pi GPIO expander binding
ARM: dts: bcm2837-rpi-3-b: add GPIO expander

Dave Stevenson (1):
gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox
service

 .../bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt    |  24 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts              |  10 +
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig                               |   9 +
 drivers/gpio/Makefile                              |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c                | 258 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h         |  18 ++
 6 files changed, 320 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/4 ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream

Add latest firmware property tags from the latest Raspberry Pi downstream kernel. This is needed for the GPIO tags, so we can control the GPIO multiplexor lines.

---
 include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h +18 -0
index cb979ad90401..50df5b28d2c9 100644
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ enum rpi_firmware_property_tag {
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_MIN_VOLTAGE =                        0x00030008,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_TURBO =                              0x00030009,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_MAX_TEMPERATURE =                    0x0003000a,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_STC =                                0x0003000b,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_ALLOCATE_MEMORY =                        0x0003000c,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_LOCK_MEMORY =                            0x0003000d,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_UNLOCK_MEMORY =                          0x0003000e,
@@ -72,12 +73,22 @@ enum rpi_firmware_property_tag {
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_ENABLE_QPU =                         0x00030012,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_DISPMANX_RESOURCE_MEM_HANDLE =       0x00030014,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_EDID_BLOCK =                         0x00030020,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_CUSTOMER_OTP =                       0x00030021,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_DOMAIN_STATE =                       0x00030030,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CLOCK_STATE =                        0x00038001,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CLOCK_RATE =                         0x00038002,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_VOLTAGE =                            0x00038003,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_TURBO =                              0x00038009,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CUSTOMER_OTP =                       0x00038021,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_DOMAIN_STATE =                       0x00038030,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_STATE =                         0x00030041,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_STATE =                         0x00038041,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_SDHOST_CLOCK =                       0x00038042,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG =                        0x00030043,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG =                        0x00038043,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_PERIPH_REG =                         0x00030045,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_PERIPH_REG =                         0x00038045,
+
 
 	/* Dispmanx TAGS */
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_ALLOCATE =                   0x00040001,
@@ -91,6 +102,8 @@ enum rpi_firmware_property_tag {
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_GET_VIRTUAL_OFFSET =         0x00040009,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_GET_OVERSCAN =               0x0004000a,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_GET_PALETTE =                0x0004000b,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_GET_TOUCHBUF =               0x0004000f,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_GET_GPIOVIRTBUF =            0x00040010,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_RELEASE =                    0x00048001,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_PHYSICAL_WIDTH_HEIGHT = 0x00044003,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_VIRTUAL_WIDTH_HEIGHT =  0x00044004,
@@ -100,6 +113,7 @@ enum rpi_firmware_property_tag {
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_VIRTUAL_OFFSET =        0x00044009,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_OVERSCAN =              0x0004400a,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_PALETTE =               0x0004400b,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_VSYNC =                 0x0004400e,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_PHYSICAL_WIDTH_HEIGHT =  0x00048003,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_VIRTUAL_WIDTH_HEIGHT =   0x00048004,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_DEPTH =                  0x00048005,
@@ -108,6 +122,10 @@ enum rpi_firmware_property_tag {
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_VIRTUAL_OFFSET =         0x00048009,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_OVERSCAN =               0x0004800a,
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_PALETTE =                0x0004800b,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_TOUCHBUF =               0x0004801f,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_GPIOVIRTBUF =            0x00048020,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_VSYNC =                  0x0004800e,
+	RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_SET_BACKLIGHT =              0x0004800f,
 
 	RPI_FIRMWARE_VCHIQ_INIT =                             0x00048010,
 
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/4 ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream

Quoted 9 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

Add latest firmware property tags from the latest Raspberry Pi downstream kernel. This is needed for the GPIO tags, so we can control the GPIO multiplexor lines.

Maybe this is obvious, but patch #3 depends on this change so no cherry-picking allowed.

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 1991337128.42939.1515837465503-7tX72C7vayboQLBSYMtkGA@public.gmane.org

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream

Quoted 7 lines · Stefan Wahren
Quoted 7 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

Add latest firmware property tags from the latest Raspberry Pi downstream kernel. This is needed for the GPIO tags, so we can control the GPIO multiplexor lines.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Maybe this is obvious, but patch #3 depends on this change so no cherry-picking allowed.

I will save this for after the merge window as it feels now.

But as far as I have the right ACKs I can put it in the GPIO tree.

Baruch: can you resend the series with all ACKs and push me to apply it all in the GPIO tree if you're fine with this approach?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CACRpkdZ_g3-jR-7pOnS9MwpHprfEz8acB9SWcMLyoOVcB0iLvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org

#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream

Hi Linus,

Quoted 11 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 10 lines · Stefan Wahren
Quoted 7 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

Add latest firmware property tags from the latest Raspberry Pi downstream kernel. This is needed for the GPIO tags, so we can control the GPIO multiplexor lines.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

Maybe this is obvious, but patch #3 depends on this change so no cherry-picking allowed.

I will save this for after the merge window as it feels now.

But as far as I have the right ACKs I can put it in the GPIO tree.

Baruch: can you resend the series with all ACKs and push me to apply it all in the GPIO tree if you're fine with this approach?

I plan to send another revision of this series later today to address Stefan's comments on this one. Once Stefan and/or Eric ack the entire series, I'm fine with you taking it through the GPIO tree if it is OK with the BCM2835 maintainers.

baruch

Signature · 7 lines
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - [email protected] - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream

Hi Baruch,

Am 16.01.2018 um 11:49 schrieb Baruch Siach:

Quoted 18 lines

Hi Linus,

Quoted 15 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 10 lines · Stefan Wahren
Quoted 7 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

Add latest firmware property tags from the latest Raspberry Pi downstream kernel. This is needed for the GPIO tags, so we can control the GPIO multiplexor lines.

Maybe this is obvious, but patch #3 depends on this change so no cherry-picking allowed.

I will save this for after the merge window as it feels now.

But as far as I have the right ACKs I can put it in the GPIO tree.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Baruch: can you resend the series with all ACKs and push me to apply it all in the GPIO tree if you're fine with this approach?

I plan to send another revision of this series later today to address Stefan's comments on this one. Once Stefan and/or Eric ack the entire series, I'm fine with you taking it through the GPIO tree if it is OK with the BCM2835 maintainers.

baruch

we also need an ACK from the devicetree maintainers. So please send a copy of the binding patch V3 to Rob Herring and Marc Rutland.

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#8 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/4 ARM: bcm2835: sync firmware properties with downstream

Quoted 28 lines · Stefan Wahren

Hi Baruch,

Am 16.01.2018 um 11:49 schrieb Baruch Siach:

Quoted 25 lines

Hi Linus,

Quoted 10 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 9 lines · Stefan Wahren
Quoted 7 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

Add latest firmware property tags from the latest Raspberry Pi downstream kernel. This is needed for the GPIO tags, so we can control the GPIO multiplexor lines.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

Maybe this is obvious, but patch #3 depends on this change so no cherry-picking allowed.

I will save this for after the merge window as it feels now.

But as far as I have the right ACKs I can put it in the GPIO tree.

Baruch: can you resend the series with all ACKs and push me to apply it all in the GPIO tree if you're fine with this approach?

I plan to send another revision of this series later today to address Stefan's comments on this one. Once Stefan and/or Eric ack the entire series, I'm fine with you taking it through the GPIO tree if it is OK with the BCM2835 maintainers.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

baruch

we also need an ACK from the devicetree maintainers. So please send a copy of the binding patch V3 to Rob Herring and Marc Rutland.

I'll be happy to see patch 1-3 go through the GPIO tree, and we'd take #4 in the 2835 tree. The only risk I see is if we need patch 1 for some other change in this cycle -- seems unlikely, but if Linus applied the series starting from a rc1 tag and merged it in, then we'll also be able to merge that patch over to any other branch we need without duplicating it in git history.

Once you get this resent with the DT folks Cced, hopefully it'll be
pretty quick.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180118/b094e1b4/attachment.sig>

#9 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/4 dt-bindings: gpio: add raspberry pi GPIO expander binding

In reply to Baruch Siach

The Raspberry Pi 3 GPIO expander is controlled by the VC4 firmware over I2C. The firmware mailbox interface allows the ARM core to control the GPIO lines.

---
v2:
* Rename compatible string to raspberrypi,firmware-gpio

---
 .../bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt new file +24 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8faf269cf541
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Raspberry Pi GPIO expander
+
+The Raspberry Pi 3 GPIO expander is controlled by the VC4 firmware. The
+firmware exposes a mailbox interface that allows the ARM core to control the
+GPIO lines on the expander.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : Should be "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio"
+- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller
+- #gpio-cells : Should be two.  The first cell is the pin number, and
+  the second cell is used to specify the gpio polarity:
+  0 = active high
+  1 = active low
+- firmware : Reference to the RPi firmware device node
+
+Example:
+
+expgpio: expgpio {
+	compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio";
+	gpio-controller;
+	#gpio-cells = <2>;
+	firmware = <&firmware>;
+};
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
#10 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/4 dt-bindings: gpio: add raspberry pi GPIO expander binding

Hi Baruch,

Quoted 31 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

The Raspberry Pi 3 GPIO expander is controlled by the VC4 firmware over I2C. The firmware mailbox interface allows the ARM core to control the GPIO lines.

---
v2:
* Rename compatible string to raspberrypi,firmware-gpio

---
 .../bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt new file +9 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8faf269cf541
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Raspberry Pi GPIO expander
+
+The Raspberry Pi 3 GPIO expander is controlled by the VC4 firmware. The
+firmware exposes a mailbox interface that allows the ARM core to control the
+GPIO lines on the expander.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : Should be "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio"

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt line 19

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/raspberrypi,firmware-gpio.txt new file +10 -0
+- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller
+- #gpio-cells : Should be two.  The first cell is the pin number, and
+  the second cell is used to specify the gpio polarity:
+  0 = active high
+  1 = active low
+- firmware : Reference to the RPi firmware device node
+
+Example:
+
+expgpio: expgpio {

just a nit, please change this to

expgpio: gpio-expander {

just like in patch #4

Thanks Stefan

#11 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/4 gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service

In reply to Baruch Siach

From: Dave Stevenson <[email protected]>

Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the VPU communicates with.
There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it.

---
v2:
* Rename driver to gpio-raspberrypi-exp
* Populate the gpiochip parent device pointer
* Use macro for the mailbox base GPIO number
* Drop linux/gpio.h and GPIOF_DIR_*
* Check and print firmware error value
* Use devm_gpiochip_add_data(); drop .remove
* A few more minor tweaks

---
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig                |   9 ++
 drivers/gpio/Makefile               |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +9 -0
index d6a8e851ad13..8df901c75bef 100644
@@ -128,6 +128,15 @@ config GPIO_AXP209
 	help
 	  Say yes to enable GPIO support for the AXP209 PMIC
 
+config GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP
+	bool "RaspberryPi 3 Exp GPIO"
+	default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
+	depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
+		(ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)
+	help
+	  Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
+	  the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
+
 config GPIO_BCM_KONA
 	bool "Broadcom Kona GPIO"
 	depends on OF_GPIO && (ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || COMPILE_TEST)
drivers/gpio/Makefile +1 -0
index 4bc24febb889..71021b0e71da 100644
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ARIZONA)	+= gpio-arizona.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ATH79)	+= gpio-ath79.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ASPEED)	+= gpio-aspeed.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_AXP209)	+= gpio-axp209.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP)	+= gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_KONA)	+= gpio-bcm-kona.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD9571MWV)	+= gpio-bd9571mwv.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BRCMSTB)	+= gpio-brcmstb.o
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +258 -0

258 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
#12 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/4 gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service

Hi Baruch,

Quoted 33 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

From: Dave Stevenson <[email protected]>

Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the VPU communicates with.
There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it.

---
v2:
* Rename driver to gpio-raspberrypi-exp
* Populate the gpiochip parent device pointer
* Use macro for the mailbox base GPIO number
* Drop linux/gpio.h and GPIOF_DIR_*
* Check and print firmware error value
* Use devm_gpiochip_add_data(); drop .remove
* A few more minor tweaks

---
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig                |   9 ++
 drivers/gpio/Makefile               |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +0 -0
index d6a8e851ad13..8df901c75bef 100644

drivers/gpio/Kconfig config GPIO_AXP209 · line 132

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +2 -0
@@ -128,6 +128,15 @@ config GPIO_AXP209
 	help
 	  Say yes to enable GPIO support for the AXP209 PMIC
 
+config GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP
+	bool "RaspberryPi 3 Exp GPIO"

How about "RaspberryPi 3 GPIO Expander" ?

Why not tristate? On arm64 it's preferred to have a kernel module.

drivers/gpio/Kconfig config GPIO_AXP209 · line 135

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +3 -0
+	default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
+	depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
+		(ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)

Since this is default on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, we could remove it from the dependencies.

Quoted 25 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +4 -0
+	help
+	  Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
+	  the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
+
 config GPIO_BCM_KONA
 	bool "Broadcom Kona GPIO"
 	depends on OF_GPIO && (ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || COMPILE_TEST)
drivers/gpio/Makefile +1 -0
index 4bc24febb889..71021b0e71da 100644
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ARIZONA)	+= gpio-arizona.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ATH79)	+= gpio-ath79.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ASPEED)	+= gpio-aspeed.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_AXP209)	+= gpio-axp209.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP)	+= gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_KONA)	+= gpio-bcm-kona.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD9571MWV)	+= gpio-bd9571mwv.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BRCMSTB)	+= gpio-brcmstb.o
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..95b1957a69fa

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 8

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ *  Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver
+ *
+ *  Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
+ *  GPIO expander on the VPU.
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.

2018?

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 15

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +7 -0
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>

I can't see any DMA handling, so please remove it.

Quoted 45 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +45 -0
+#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h>
+
+#define MODULE_NAME "raspberrypi-exp-gpio"
+#define NUM_GPIO 8
+
+#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE	128
+
+#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_IN	0
+#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_OUT	1
+
+struct rpi_exp_gpio {
+	struct gpio_chip gc;
+	struct rpi_firmware *fw;
+};
+
+/* VC4 firmware mailbox interface data structures */
+
+struct gpio_set_config {
+	u32 gpio;
+	u32 direction;
+	u32 polarity;
+	u32 term_en;
+	u32 term_pull_up;
+	u32 state;
+};
+
+struct gpio_get_config {
+	u32 gpio;
+	u32 direction;
+	u32 polarity;
+	u32 term_en;
+	u32 term_pull_up;
+};
+
+struct gpio_get_set_state {
+	u32 gpio;
+	u32 state;
+};
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
+{
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+	struct gpio_get_config get;
+	int ret;
+

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 70

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+	gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;	/* GPIO to update */
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+				    &get, sizeof(get));
+	if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
+		dev_err(gc->parent,
+			"Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+			get.gpio);

Can't we change this to fit in 2 lines?

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +6 -0
+		return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+	}
+	return get.polarity;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 86

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+{
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+	struct gpio_set_config set_in;
+	int ret;
+
+	gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	set_in.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;	/* GPIO to update */
+	set_in.direction = RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_IN;
+	set_in.polarity = rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);

This could fail, so please check the return code.

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 97

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +11 -0
+					/* Retain existing setting */
+	set_in.term_en = 0;		/* termination disabled */
+	set_in.term_pull_up = 0;	/* n/a as termination disabled */
+	set_in.state = 0;		/* n/a as configured as an input */
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+				    &set_in, sizeof(set_in));
+	if (ret || set_in.gpio != 0) {
+		dev_err(gc->parent,
+			"Failed to set GPIO %u to input (%d %x)\n",
+			off, ret, set_in.gpio);

see above

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +6 -0
+		return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 113

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+{
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+	struct gpio_set_config set_out;
+	int ret;
+
+	gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	set_out.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;	/* GPIO to update */
+	set_out.direction = RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_OUT;
+	set_out.polarity = rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);

This could also fail.

Quoted 111 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +111 -0
+					/* Retain existing setting */
+	set_out.term_en = 0;		/* n/a as an output */
+	set_out.term_pull_up = 0;	/* n/a as termination disabled */
+	set_out.state = val;		/* Output state */
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+				    &set_out, sizeof(set_out));
+	if (ret || set_out.gpio != 0) {
+		dev_err(gc->parent,
+			"Failed to set GPIO %u to output (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+			set_out.gpio);
+		return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
+{
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+	struct gpio_get_config get;
+	int ret;
+
+	gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;	/* GPIO to update */
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+				    &get, sizeof(get));
+	if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
+		dev_err(gc->parent,
+			"Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+			get.gpio);
+		return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+	}
+	return !get.direction;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
+{
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+	struct gpio_get_set_state get;
+	int ret;
+
+	gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;	/* GPIO to update */
+	get.state = 0;		/* storage for returned value */
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_STATE,
+					 &get, sizeof(get));
+	if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
+		dev_err(gc->parent,
+			"Failed to get GPIO %u state (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+			get.gpio);
+		return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+	}
+	return !!get.state;
+}
+
+static void rpi_exp_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)
+{
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+	struct gpio_get_set_state set;
+	int ret;
+
+	gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	set.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;	/* GPIO to update */
+	set.state = val;	/* Output state */
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_STATE,
+					 &set, sizeof(set));
+	if (ret || set.gpio != 0)
+		dev_err(gc->parent,
+			"Failed to set GPIO %u state (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+			set.gpio);
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int err = 0;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct device_node *fw_node;
+	struct rpi_firmware *fw;
+	struct rpi_exp_gpio *rpi_gpio;
+
+	fw_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "firmware", 0);
+	if (!fw_node) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node);
+	if (!fw)
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+	rpi_gpio = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rpi_gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rpi_gpio)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	rpi_gpio->fw = fw;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.parent = dev;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.label = MODULE_NAME;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.of_node = np;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.base = -1;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.ngpio = NUM_GPIO;
+
+	rpi_gpio->gc.direction_input = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.direction_output = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out;

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 234

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+	rpi_gpio->gc.get_direction = rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.get = rpi_exp_gpio_get;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.set = rpi_exp_gpio_set;
+	rpi_gpio->gc.can_sleep = true;
+
+	err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &rpi_gpio->gc, rpi_gpio);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi_gpio);

Since we use devm_gpiochip_add_data, we can drop this.

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +4 -0
+
+	return 0;
+}
+

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 248

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+static const struct of_device_id rpi_exp_gpio_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpi_exp_gpio_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
+	.driver	= {
+		.name		= MODULE_NAME,
+		.owner		= THIS_MODULE,

Please drop this, too.

Thanks
Stefan

#13 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/4 gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service

Quoted 38 lines · Stefan Wahren

Hi Baruch,

Quoted 36 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

From: Dave Stevenson <[email protected]>

Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the VPU communicates with.
There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it.

---
v2:
* Rename driver to gpio-raspberrypi-exp
* Populate the gpiochip parent device pointer
* Use macro for the mailbox base GPIO number
* Drop linux/gpio.h and GPIOF_DIR_*
* Check and print firmware error value
* Use devm_gpiochip_add_data(); drop .remove
* A few more minor tweaks

---
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig                |   9 ++
 drivers/gpio/Makefile               |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +0 -0
index d6a8e851ad13..8df901c75bef 100644
@@ -128,6 +128,15 @@ config GPIO_AXP209
      help
        Say yes to enable GPIO support for the AXP209 PMIC
 
Quoted 6 lines

drivers/gpio/Kconfig config GPIO_AXP209 · line 132

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +2 -0
+config GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP
+     bool "RaspberryPi 3 Exp GPIO"

How about "RaspberryPi 3 GPIO Expander" ?

Why not tristate? On arm64 it's preferred to have a kernel module.

And on all generic distros, like Fedora, that cater for generic kernels with support for 100s of devices where most things are modular to keep the kernel as small as possible.

Quoted 310 lines

drivers/gpio/Kconfig config GPIO_AXP209 · line 135

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +3 -0
+     default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
+     depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
+             (ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)

Since this is default on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, we could remove it from the dependencies.

Quoted 25 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +4 -0
+     help
+       Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
+       the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
+
 config GPIO_BCM_KONA
      bool "Broadcom Kona GPIO"
      depends on OF_GPIO && (ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || COMPILE_TEST)
drivers/gpio/Makefile +1 -0
index 4bc24febb889..71021b0e71da 100644
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ARIZONA)  += gpio-arizona.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ATH79)     += gpio-ath79.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ASPEED)    += gpio-aspeed.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_AXP209)    += gpio-axp209.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP)   += gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_KONA)  += gpio-bcm-kona.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD9571MWV) += gpio-bd9571mwv.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BRCMSTB)   += gpio-brcmstb.o
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..95b1957a69fa

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 8

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ *  Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver
+ *
+ *  Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
+ *  GPIO expander on the VPU.
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.

2018?

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 15

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +7 -0
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>

I can't see any DMA handling, so please remove it.

Quoted 45 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +45 -0
+#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h>
+
+#define MODULE_NAME "raspberrypi-exp-gpio"
+#define NUM_GPIO 8
+
+#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE    128
+
+#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_IN  0
+#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_OUT 1
+
+struct rpi_exp_gpio {
+     struct gpio_chip gc;
+     struct rpi_firmware *fw;
+};
+
+/* VC4 firmware mailbox interface data structures */
+
+struct gpio_set_config {
+     u32 gpio;
+     u32 direction;
+     u32 polarity;
+     u32 term_en;
+     u32 term_pull_up;
+     u32 state;
+};
+
+struct gpio_get_config {
+     u32 gpio;
+     u32 direction;
+     u32 polarity;
+     u32 term_en;
+     u32 term_pull_up;
+};
+
+struct gpio_get_set_state {
+     u32 gpio;
+     u32 state;
+};
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
+{
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+     struct gpio_get_config get;
+     int ret;
+

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 70

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+     gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+     get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;     /* GPIO to update */
+
+     ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+                                 &get, sizeof(get));
+     if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
+             dev_err(gc->parent,
+                     "Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+                     get.gpio);

Can't we change this to fit in 2 lines?

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +6 -0
+             return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+     }
+     return get.polarity;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 86

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+{
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+     struct gpio_set_config set_in;
+     int ret;
+
+     gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+     set_in.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;  /* GPIO to update */
+     set_in.direction = RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_IN;
+     set_in.polarity = rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);

This could fail, so please check the return code.

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 97

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +11 -0
+                                     /* Retain existing setting */
+     set_in.term_en = 0;             /* termination disabled */
+     set_in.term_pull_up = 0;        /* n/a as termination disabled */
+     set_in.state = 0;               /* n/a as configured as an input */
+
+     ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+                                 &set_in, sizeof(set_in));
+     if (ret || set_in.gpio != 0) {
+             dev_err(gc->parent,
+                     "Failed to set GPIO %u to input (%d %x)\n",
+                     off, ret, set_in.gpio);

see above

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +6 -0
+             return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+     }
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 113

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+{
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+     struct gpio_set_config set_out;
+     int ret;
+
+     gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+     set_out.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
+     set_out.direction = RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_OUT;
+     set_out.polarity = rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);

This could also fail.

Quoted 111 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +111 -0
+                                     /* Retain existing setting */
+     set_out.term_en = 0;            /* n/a as an output */
+     set_out.term_pull_up = 0;       /* n/a as termination disabled */
+     set_out.state = val;            /* Output state */
+
+     ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+                                 &set_out, sizeof(set_out));
+     if (ret || set_out.gpio != 0) {
+             dev_err(gc->parent,
+                     "Failed to set GPIO %u to output (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+                     set_out.gpio);
+             return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+     }
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
+{
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+     struct gpio_get_config get;
+     int ret;
+
+     gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+     get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;     /* GPIO to update */
+
+     ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
+                                 &get, sizeof(get));
+     if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
+             dev_err(gc->parent,
+                     "Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+                     get.gpio);
+             return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+     }
+     return !get.direction;
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
+{
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+     struct gpio_get_set_state get;
+     int ret;
+
+     gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+     get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;     /* GPIO to update */
+     get.state = 0;          /* storage for returned value */
+
+     ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_STATE,
+                                      &get, sizeof(get));
+     if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
+             dev_err(gc->parent,
+                     "Failed to get GPIO %u state (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+                     get.gpio);
+             return ret ? ret : -EIO;
+     }
+     return !!get.state;
+}
+
+static void rpi_exp_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)
+{
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
+     struct gpio_get_set_state set;
+     int ret;
+
+     gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+     set.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE;     /* GPIO to update */
+     set.state = val;        /* Output state */
+
+     ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_STATE,
+                                      &set, sizeof(set));
+     if (ret || set.gpio != 0)
+             dev_err(gc->parent,
+                     "Failed to set GPIO %u state (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
+                     set.gpio);
+}
+
+static int rpi_exp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+     int err = 0;
+     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+     struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+     struct device_node *fw_node;
+     struct rpi_firmware *fw;
+     struct rpi_exp_gpio *rpi_gpio;
+
+     fw_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "firmware", 0);
+     if (!fw_node) {
+             dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
+             return -ENOENT;
+     }
+
+     fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node);
+     if (!fw)
+             return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+     rpi_gpio = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rpi_gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
+     if (!rpi_gpio)
+             return -ENOMEM;
+
+     rpi_gpio->fw = fw;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.parent = dev;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.label = MODULE_NAME;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.of_node = np;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.base = -1;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.ngpio = NUM_GPIO;
+
+     rpi_gpio->gc.direction_input = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.direction_output = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out;

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 234

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+     rpi_gpio->gc.get_direction = rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.get = rpi_exp_gpio_get;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.set = rpi_exp_gpio_set;
+     rpi_gpio->gc.can_sleep = true;
+
+     err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &rpi_gpio->gc, rpi_gpio);
+     if (err)
+             return err;
+
+     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi_gpio);

Since we use devm_gpiochip_add_data, we can drop this.

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +4 -0
+
+     return 0;
+}
+

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 248

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +10 -0
+static const struct of_device_id rpi_exp_gpio_ids[] = {
+     { .compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio" },
+     { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpi_exp_gpio_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
+     .driver = {
+             .name           = MODULE_NAME,
+             .owner          = THIS_MODULE,

Please drop this, too.

Thanks
Stefan

_______________________________________________
linux-rpi-kernel mailing list
linux-rpi-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rpi-kernel

#14 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/4 gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service

In reply to Stefan Wahren

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for reviewing. Please find below a few questions.

Quoted 5 lines · Stefan Wahren

drivers/gpio/Kconfig config GPIO_AXP209 · line 135

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +3 -0
+	default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
+	depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
+		(ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)

Since this is default on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, we could remove it from the dependencies.

This driver does not work when RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE is not enabled. So the driver should not be selectable, regardless of its default enable/disable state.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +4 -0
+	help
+	  Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
+	  the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
+

[...]

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +2 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 8

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +6 -0
+ *  Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver
+ *
+ *  Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
+ *  GPIO expander on the VPU.
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.

2018?

Why? Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd added no code to this driver in 2018.

[...]

Quoted 6 lines

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 248

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +4 -0
+static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
+	.driver	= {
+		.name		= MODULE_NAME,
+		.owner		= THIS_MODULE,

Please drop this, too.

Why? Recent GPIO drivers include this line. I have seen no commits removing .owner from GPIO drivers in mainline or in current development tree.

baruch

Signature · 3 lines
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
#15 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/4 gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service

Hi Baruch,

Quoted 14 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 14. Januar 2018 um 07:08 geschrieben:

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for reviewing. Please find below a few questions.

Quoted 5 lines · Stefan Wahren

drivers/gpio/Kconfig config GPIO_AXP209 · line 135

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +3 -0
+	default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
+	depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
+		(ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)

Since this is default on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, we could remove it from the dependencies.

Quoted 3 lines

This driver does not work when RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE is not enabled. So the driver should not be selectable, regardless of its default enable/disable state.

I know. My idea was to increase build test coverage. Nevertheless the more common style would be:

depends on ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST
depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE

Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpio/Kconfig +4 -0
+	help
+	  Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
+	  the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
+

[...]

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +2 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 8

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +6 -0
+ *  Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver
+ *
+ *  Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
+ *  GPIO expander on the VPU.
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.

2018?

Quoted 1 line

Why? Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd added no code to this driver in 2018.

Sure. Don't you want to add your copyright?

Quoted 11 lines

[...]

Quoted 6 lines

drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c line 248

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c new file +4 -0
+static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
+	.driver	= {
+		.name		= MODULE_NAME,
+		.owner		= THIS_MODULE,

Please drop this, too.

Why? Recent GPIO drivers include this line.

I don't know which driver your are referring to, but platform driver doesn't need this.

Please grep for all platform_driver in gpio and you won't see any setting of ownership. I'm not speaking about the gpiochip.

Btw my replies to #2 and #4 got blocked, should i try to resend it to you.

Thanks
Stefan

Quoted 14 lines

I have seen no commits removing
.owner from GPIO drivers in mainline or in current development tree.

baruch

Signature · 8 lines
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
#16 lore raw

PATCH v2 4/4 ARM: dts: bcm2837-rpi-3-b: add GPIO expander

In reply to Baruch Siach

Add a description of the RPi3 GPIO expander that the VC4 firmware controls.

---
v2:
* Move GPIO expander node out of the soc container
* Rename compatible string
* Add gpio-line-names property

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts +10 -0
index b44b3b5af00d..24555e8a43ec 100644
@@ -23,6 +23,16 @@
 			gpios = <&gpio 47 0>;
 		};
 	};
+
+	expgpio: gpio-expander {
+		compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio";
+		gpio-controller;
+		#gpio-cells = <2>;
+		firmware = <&firmware>;
+		gpio-line-names = "BT_ON", "WL_ON", "STATUS_LED", "LAN_RUN",
+			"HPD_N", "CAM_GPIO0", "CAM_GPIO1", "PWR_LOW_N";
+		status = "okay";
+	};
 };
 
 /* uart0 communicates with the BT module */
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
#17 lore raw

PATCH v2 4/4 ARM: dts: bcm2837-rpi-3-b: add GPIO expander

Hi Baruch,

Quoted 21 lines

Baruch Siach <[email protected]> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:

Add a description of the RPi3 GPIO expander that the VC4 firmware controls.

---
v2:
* Move GPIO expander node out of the soc container
* Rename compatible string
* Add gpio-line-names property

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts +0 -0
index b44b3b5af00d..24555e8a43ec 100644
@@ -23,6 +23,16 @@
 			gpios = <&gpio 47 0>;

arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts line 33

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts +8 -0
 		};
 	};
+
+	expgpio: gpio-expander {
+		compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio";
+		gpio-controller;
+		#gpio-cells = <2>;
+		firmware = <&firmware>;
+		gpio-line-names = "BT_ON", "WL_ON", "STATUS_LED", "LAN_RUN",
+			"HPD_N", "CAM_GPIO0", "CAM_GPIO1", "PWR_LOW_N";

please one GPIO name per line like in the other files. This makes it easier to review changes and add comments.

Stefan

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts +2 -0
+		status = "okay";
+	};
 };
 
 /* uart0 communicates with the BT module */
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1