IR decoding using BPF
Subsystems (10)
Sean Young
maintainerv3 cover IR decoding using BPF
The kernel IR decoders (drivers/media/rc/ir-*-decoder.c) support the most widely used IR protocols, but there are many protocols which are not supported[1]. For example, the lirc-remotes[2] repo has over 2700 remotes, many of which are not supported by rc-core. There is a "long tail" of unsupported IR protocols, for which lircd is need to decode the IR .
IR encoding is done in such a way that some simple circuit can decode it; therefore, bpf is ideal.
In order to support all these protocols, here we have bpf based IR decoding. The idea is that user-space can define a decoder in bpf, attach it to the rc device through the lirc chardev.
Separate work is underway to extend ir-keytable to have an extensive library of bpf-based decoders, and a much expanded library of rc keymaps.
Another future application would be to compile IRP[3] to a IR BPF program, and so support virtually every remote without having to write a decoder for each. It might also be possible to support non-button devices such as analog directional pads or air conditioning remote controls and decode the target temperature in bpf, and pass that to an input device.
Thanks,
Sean Young
[1] http://www.hifi-remote.com/wiki/index.php?title=DecodeIR
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/lirc-remotes/code/ci/master/tree/remotes/
[3] http://www.hifi-remote.com/wiki/index.php?title=IRP_Notation
Changes since v2:
- Fixed locking issues
- Improved self-test to cover more cases
- Rebased on bpf-next again
Changes since v1:
- Code review comments from Y Song <[email protected]> and Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re-wrote sample bpf to be selftest
- Renamed RAWIR_DECODER -> RAWIR_EVENT (Kconfig, context, bpf prog type)
- Rebase on bpf-next
- Introduced bpf_rawir_event context structure with simpler access checking
Sean Young (2):
media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 ++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 ++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 ++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 +++++++ 18 files changed, 792 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
Sean Young
maintainerPATCH v3 1/2 media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
Add support for BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can call rc_keydown() to reported decoded IR scancodes, or rc_repeat() to report that the last key should be repeated.
The bpf program can be attached to using the bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH) syscall; the target_fd must be the /dev/lircN device.
--- drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h
drivers/media/rc/Kconfig +13 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ config LIRC passes raw IR to and from userspace, which is needed for IR transmitting (aka "blasting") and for the lirc daemon. +config BPF_RAWIR_EVENT + bool "Support for eBPF programs attached to lirc devices" + depends on BPF_SYSCALL + depends on RC_CORE=y + depends on LIRC + help + Allow attaching eBPF programs to a lirc device using the bpf(2) + syscall command BPF_PROG_ATTACH. This is supported for raw IR + receivers. + + These eBPF programs can be used to decode IR into scancodes, for + IR protocols not supported by the kernel decoders. + menuconfig RC_DECODERS bool "Remote controller decoders" depends on RC_CORE
drivers/media/rc/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-y += keymaps/ obj-$(CONFIG_RC_CORE) += rc-core.o rc-core-y := rc-main.o rc-ir-raw.o rc-core-$(CONFIG_LIRC) += lirc_dev.o +rc-core-$(CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT) += bpf-rawir-event.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_NEC_DECODER) += ir-nec-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC5_DECODER) += ir-rc5-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC6_DECODER) += ir-rc6-decoder.o
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +363 -0
363 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c +24 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/file.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/poll.h> #include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -816,4 +817,27 @@ void __exit lirc_dev_exit(void)unregister_chrdev_region (lirc_base_dev,RC_DEV_MAX ); } +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd (int fd) +{ +struct fd f =fdget (fd); +struct lirc_fh *fh; +struct rc_dev *dev; + +if (!f.file) +return ERR_PTR (-EBADF ); + +if (f.file->f_op != &lirc_fops) { +fdput (f); +return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); + } + + fh = f.file->private_data; + dev = fh->rc; + +get_device (&dev->dev); +fdput (f); + +return dev; +} +MODULE_ALIAS ("lirc_dev" );
drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h +24 -0
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@#define MAX_IR_EVENT_SIZE 512#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h> #include <media/rc-core.h> /**
@@ -57,6 +58,11 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl {/* raw decoder state follows */ struct ir_raw_event prev_ev;struct ir_raw_event this_ev; + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +struct bpf_rawir_event bpf_rawir_event; +struct list_head progs; +#endif struct nec_dec {int state;unsigned count;
@@ -126,6 +132,9 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl { } imon; }; +/* Mutex for locking raw IR processing and handler change */ +extern struct mutex ir_raw_handler_lock; +/* macros for IR decoders */ static inline bool geq_margin (unsigned d1,unsigned d2,unsigned margin) {
@@ -288,6 +297,7 @@ void ir_lirc_raw_event(struct rc_dev *dev, struct ir_raw_event ev);void ir_lirc_scancode_event (struct rc_dev *dev,struct lirc_scancode *lsc);int ir_lirc_register (struct rc_dev *dev);void ir_lirc_unregister (struct rc_dev *dev); +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd (int fd);#else static inline int lirc_dev_init (void ) {return 0 ; }static inline void lirc_dev_exit (void ) {}
@@ -299,4 +309,18 @@ static inline int ir_lirc_register(struct rc_dev *dev) { return 0; }static inline void ir_lirc_unregister (struct rc_dev *dev) { }#endif +/* +* bpf interface +*/ +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *dev); +void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *dev); +void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *dev,struct ir_raw_event ev); +#else +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *dev) { } +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *dev) { } +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *dev,struct ir_raw_event ev) +{ } +#endif +#endif /* _RC_CORE_PRIV */
drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c +12 -2
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@static LIST_HEAD (ir_raw_client_list);/* Used to handle IR raw handler extensions */ -static DEFINE_MUTEX (ir_raw_handler_lock); +DEFINE_MUTEX (ir_raw_handler_lock);static LIST_HEAD (ir_raw_handler_list);static atomic64_t available_protocols =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 );
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int ir_raw_event_thread(void *data) handler->protocols || !handler->protocols) handler->decode (raw->dev, ev);ir_lirc_raw_event (raw->dev, ev); +rc_dev_bpf_run (raw->dev, ev); raw->prev_ev = ev; }mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock);
@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ int ir_raw_event_prepare(struct rc_dev *dev)spin_lock_init (&dev->raw->edge_spinlock);timer_setup (&dev->raw->edge_handle, ir_raw_edge_handle,0 );INIT_KFIFO (dev->raw->kfifo); +rc_dev_bpf_init (dev);return 0 ; }
@@ -621,9 +623,17 @@ void ir_raw_event_unregister(struct rc_dev *dev)list_for_each_entry (handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list)if (handler->raw_unregister) handler->raw_unregister (dev); -mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); + +rc_dev_bpf_free (dev);ir_raw_event_free (dev); + +/* +* A user can be calling bpf(BPF_PROG_{QUERY|ATTACH|DETACH}), so +* ensure that the raw member is null on unlock; this is how +* "device gone" is checked. +*/ +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); }/*
include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h new file +30 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _BPF_RCDEV_H +#define _BPF_RCDEV_H + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr); +int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr); +int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr,union bpf_attr __user *uattr); +#else +static inline int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static inline int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static inline int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr, +union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +#endif + +#endif /* _BPF_RCDEV_H */
include/linux/bpf_types.h +3 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, raw_tracepoint)#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE, cg_dev)#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, rawir_event) +#endif BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, array_map_ops)BPF_MAP_TYPE (BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY , percpu_array_map_ops)
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +54 -1
85 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/bpf/syscall.c +7 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@*/ #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h> #include <linux/btf.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h> #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -1567,6 +1568,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER :case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT :return sockmap_get_from_fd (attr,BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB , true); +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_attach (attr);default :return -EINVAL ; }
@@ -1637,6 +1640,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER :case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT :return sockmap_get_from_fd (attr,BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB , false); +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_detach (attr);default :return -EINVAL ; }
@@ -1684,6 +1689,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,case BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS :case BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE :break ; +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_query (attr, uattr);default :return -EINVAL ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
2018-05-16 22:04 UTC+0100 ~ Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Add support for
BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can callrc_keydown()to reported decoded IR scancodes, orrc_repeat()to report that the last key should be repeated.The bpf program can be attached to using the
bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH)syscall; thetarget_fdmust be the/dev/lircNdevice.Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 15 lines
--- drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h
[...]
Hi Sean,
Please find below some nitpicks on the documentation for the two helpers.
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +0
-0
[...]
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1911
Quoted 9 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +5
-0@@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {* egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now. * Return * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error. +* +* int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle) +* Description +* Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in +* BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully
Could you please use bold RST markup for constants and function names? Typically for BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT here and the enum below.
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1912
Quoted 1 line
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +1
-0+* decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event,
s/This is will/This will/?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1916
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +4
-0+* and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded +* protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum).
This documentation is intended to be compiled as a man page. Could you please use a complete sentence here?
Also, this could do with additional markup as well: **struct bpf_rawir_event**.
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1922
Quoted 6 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +6
-0+* +* Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button +* was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes, +* copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0. +* +* Return
The "Return" lines here and in the second helper use space indent instead as tabs (as all other lines do). Would you mind fixing it for consistency?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1923
Quoted 1 line
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +1
-0+* Always return 0 (for now)
Other helpers use just "0" in that case, but I do not really mind. Out of curiosity, do you have anything specific in mind for changing the return value here in the future?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1928
Quoted 5 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +5
-0+* +* int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx) +* Description +* Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like +* NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button,
s/repeat/repeating/?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1932
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +4
-0+* in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is +* not repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event.
Please use a complete sentence here as well, if you do not mind.
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1936
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +3
-0+* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) */
Thanks,
Quentin
Sean Young
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
Hi Quentin,
Quoted 25 lines · Quentin Monnet
2018-05-16 22:04 UTC+0100 ~ Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Add support for
BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can callrc_keydown()to reported decoded IR scancodes, orrc_repeat()to report that the last key should be repeated.The bpf program can be attached to using the
bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH)syscall; thetarget_fdmust be the/dev/lircNdevice.Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>Quoted 15 lines
--- drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h
Quoted 5 lines
[...]
Hi Sean,
Please find below some nitpicks on the documentation for the two helpers.
I agree with all your points. I will reword and fix this for v4.
Thanks,
Sean
Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 5 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +0
-0[...]
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1911
Quoted 9 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +5
-0@@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {* egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now. * Return * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error. +* +* int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle) +* Description +* Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in +* BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully Could you please use bold RST markup for constants and function names? Typically for
BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENThere and the enum below.include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1912
Quoted 1 line
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +1
-0+* decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event, s/This is will/This will/?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1916
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +4
-0+* and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded +* protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum). This documentation is intended to be compiled as a man page. Could you please use a complete sentence here?
Also, this could do with additional markup as well: **struct bpf_rawir_event**.include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1922
Quoted 6 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +6
-0+* +* Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button +* was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes, +* copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0. +* +* Return The "Return" lines here and in the second helper use space indent instead as tabs (as all other lines do). Would you mind fixing it for consistency?
Quoted 5 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1923
Quoted 1 line
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +1
-0+* Always return 0 (for now) Other helpers use just "0" in that case, but I do not really mind. Out of curiosity, do you have anything specific in mind for changing the return value here in the future?
I don't expect this is to change, so I should just "0".
Quoted 22 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1928
Quoted 6 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +5
-0+* +* int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx) +* Description +* Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like +* NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button, s/repeat/repeating/?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1932
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +4
-0+* in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is +* not repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event. Please use a complete sentence here as well, if you do not mind.
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 1936
Quoted 4 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +3
-0+* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) */ Thanks,
Quentin
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
In reply to Sean YoungQuoted 279 lines · Sean Young
Add support for
BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can callrc_keydown()to reported decoded IR scancodes, orrc_repeat()to report that the last key should be repeated.The bpf program can be attached to using the
bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH)syscall; thetarget_fdmust be the/dev/lircNdevice.Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.hdrivers/media/rc/Kconfig +13
-0@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ config LIRC passes raw IR to and from userspace, which is needed for IR transmitting (aka "blasting") and for the lirc daemon. +config BPF_RAWIR_EVENT + bool "Support for eBPF programs attached to lirc devices" + depends on BPF_SYSCALL + depends on RC_CORE=y + depends on LIRC + help + Allow attaching eBPF programs to a lirc device using the bpf(2) + syscall command BPF_PROG_ATTACH. This is supported for raw IR + receivers. + + These eBPF programs can be used to decode IR into scancodes, for + IR protocols not supported by the kernel decoders. + menuconfig RC_DECODERS bool "Remote controller decoders" depends on RC_COREdrivers/media/rc/Makefile +1
-0@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-y += keymaps/ obj-$(CONFIG_RC_CORE) += rc-core.o rc-core-y := rc-main.o rc-ir-raw.o rc-core-$(CONFIG_LIRC) += lirc_dev.o +rc-core-$(CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT) += bpf-rawir-event.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_NEC_DECODER) += ir-nec-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC5_DECODER) += ir-rc5-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC6_DECODER) += ir-rc6-decoder.odrivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +214
-0@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// bpf-rawir-event.c - handles bpf +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/filter.h> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h> +#include "rc-core-priv.h" + +/* +* BPF interface for raw IR +*/ +const struct bpf_prog_ops rawir_event_prog_ops = { +}; + +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_rc_repeat, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl; + + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event); + +rc_repeat (ctrl->dev); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_repeat_proto = { + .func = bpf_rc_repeat, + .gpl_only = true,/* rc_repeat is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */ + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_rc_keydown, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event, u32, protocol, + u32, scancode, u32, toggle) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl; + + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event); + +rc_keydown (ctrl->dev, protocol, scancode, toggle !=0 ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_keydown_proto = { + .func = bpf_rc_keydown, + .gpl_only = true,/* rc_keydown is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */ + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , + .arg2_type =ARG_ANYTHING , + .arg3_type =ARG_ANYTHING , + .arg4_type =ARG_ANYTHING , +}; + +static const struct bpf_func_proto * +rawir_event_func_proto (enum bpf_func_id func_id,const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +switch (func_id) { +case BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat: +return &rc_repeat_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown: +return &rc_keydown_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem: +return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem: +return &bpf_map_update_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem: +return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns: +return &bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_tail_call: +return &bpf_tail_call_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32: +return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk: +if (capable (CAP_SYS_ADMIN )) +return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto (); +/* fall through */ +default : +return NULL ; + } +} + +static bool rawir_event_is_valid_access (int off,int size, +enum bpf_access_type type, +const struct bpf_prog *prog, +struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info) +{ +/* struct bpf_rawir_event has two u32 fields */ +if (type ==BPF_WRITE ) +return false; + +if (size !=sizeof (__u32)) +return false; + +if (!(off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event , duration) || + off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event , type))) +return false; + +return true; +} + +const struct bpf_verifier_ops rawir_event_verifier_ops = { + .get_func_proto = rawir_event_func_proto, + .is_valid_access = rawir_event_is_valid_access +}; + +#define BPF_MAX_PROGS 64 + +static int rc_dev_bpf_attach (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; +int ret, size; + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) +return ret; + + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + size =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) { +if (pl->prog == prog) { + ret = -EEXIST ; + goto out; + } + + size++; + } + +if (size >=BPF_MAX_PROGS ) { + ret = -E2BIG ; + goto out; + } + + pl =kmalloc (sizeof (*pl),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pl) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out; + } + + pl->prog = prog; +list_add (&pl->node, &raw->progs); +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +return ret; +} + +static int rc_dev_bpf_detach (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp; +int ret; + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) +return ret; + + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + ret = -ENOENT ; + +list_for_each_entry_safe (pl, tmp, &raw->progs, node) { +if (pl->prog == prog) { +list_del (&pl->node); +kfree (pl); +bpf_prog_put (prog); + ret =0 ; + goto out; + } + } +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +return ret; +} + +void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *rcdev) +{ +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&rcdev->raw->progs); +} + +void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct ir_raw_event ev) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw = rcdev->raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; + +if (list_empty (&raw->progs)) +return ; + +if (unlikely (ev.carrier_report)) { + raw->bpf_rawir_event.carrier = ev.carrier; + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER ; + }else { + raw->bpf_rawir_event.duration = ev.duration; + +if (ev.pulse) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE ;
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 224
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +10
-0+else if (ev.timeout) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT ; +else if (ev.reset) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET ; +else + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE ; + } + +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) +BPF_PROG_RUN (pl->prog, &raw->bpf_rawir_event);
Is the raw->progs protected by locks? It is possible that attaching/detaching could manipulate raw->progs at the same time? In perf/cgroup prog array case, the prog array run is protected by rcu and the dummy prog idea is to avoid the prog is skipped by reshuffling.
Also, the original idea about using prog array is the least overhead since you want to BPF programs to execute as soon as possible.
Quoted 79 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +79
-0+} + +void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *rcdev) +{ +struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp; + +list_for_each_entry_safe (pl, tmp, &rcdev->raw->progs, node) { +list_del (&pl->node); +bpf_prog_put (pl->prog); +kfree (pl); + } +} + +int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +struct bpf_prog *prog; +struct rc_dev *rcdev; +int ret; + +if (attr->attach_flags) +return -EINVAL ; + + prog =bpf_prog_get_type (attr->attach_bpf_fd, +BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT ); +if (IS_ERR (prog)) +return PTR_ERR (prog); + + rcdev =rc_dev_get_from_fd (attr->target_fd); +if (IS_ERR (rcdev)) { +bpf_prog_put (prog); +return PTR_ERR (rcdev); + } + + ret =rc_dev_bpf_attach (rcdev, prog); +if (ret) +bpf_prog_put (prog); + +put_device (&rcdev->dev); + +return ret; +} + +int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +struct bpf_prog *prog; +struct rc_dev *rcdev; +int ret; + +if (attr->attach_flags) +return -EINVAL ; + + prog =bpf_prog_get_type (attr->attach_bpf_fd, +BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT ); +if (IS_ERR (prog)) +return PTR_ERR (prog); + + rcdev =rc_dev_get_from_fd (attr->target_fd); +if (IS_ERR (rcdev)) { +bpf_prog_put (prog); +return PTR_ERR (rcdev); + } + + ret =rc_dev_bpf_detach (rcdev, prog); + +bpf_prog_put (prog); +put_device (&rcdev->dev); + +return ret; +} + +int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr,union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ +__u32 __user *prog_ids =u64_to_user_ptr (attr->query.prog_ids); +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; +struct rc_dev *rcdev; +u32 cnt, flags =0 , *ids, i; +int ret; +
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 313
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +10
-0+if (attr->query.query_flags) +return -EINVAL ; + + rcdev =rc_dev_get_from_fd (attr->query.target_fd); +if (IS_ERR (rcdev)) +return PTR_ERR (rcdev); + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto out;
mutex_lock_interruptible() has not been called. You can just return here.
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 128
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +5
-0+ } + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) + goto out;
Maybe you can rename label "out" to "unlock" since it is really an unlock and out?
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +28
-0+ + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + cnt =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) + cnt++; + +if (copy_to_user (&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &cnt,sizeof (cnt))) { + ret = -EFAULT ; + goto out; + } +if (copy_to_user (&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags,sizeof (flags))) { + ret = -EFAULT ; + goto out; + } + +if (attr->query.prog_cnt !=0 && prog_ids && cnt) { +if (attr->query.prog_cnt < cnt) + cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt; + + ids =kmalloc_array (cnt,sizeof (u32),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!ids) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out;
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 356
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +10
-0+ } + + i =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) { + ids[i++] = pl->prog->aux->id; +if (i == cnt) +break ; + } + + ret =copy_to_user (prog_ids, ids, cnt *sizeof (u32));
Do you want to give user a chance to know that the "cnt" is not big enough by return -ENOSPC if cnt is smaller than the number of progs in the array?
Quoted 342 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +7
-0+ } +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +put_device (&rcdev->dev); + +return ret; +}drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c +24
-0@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/file.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/poll.h> #include <linux/sched.h> @@ -816,4 +817,27 @@ void __exit lirc_dev_exit(void)unregister_chrdev_region (lirc_base_dev,RC_DEV_MAX ); } +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd (int fd) +{ +struct fd f =fdget (fd); +struct lirc_fh *fh; +struct rc_dev *dev; + +if (!f.file) +return ERR_PTR (-EBADF ); + +if (f.file->f_op != &lirc_fops) { +fdput (f); +return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); + } + + fh = f.file->private_data; + dev = fh->rc; + +get_device (&dev->dev); +fdput (f); + +return dev; +} +MODULE_ALIAS ("lirc_dev" );drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h +24
-0@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@#define MAX_IR_EVENT_SIZE 512#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h> #include <media/rc-core.h> /** @@ -57,6 +58,11 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl {/* raw decoder state follows */ struct ir_raw_event prev_ev;struct ir_raw_event this_ev; + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +struct bpf_rawir_event bpf_rawir_event; +struct list_head progs; +#endif struct nec_dec {int state;unsigned count;@@ -126,6 +132,9 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl { } imon; }; +/* Mutex for locking raw IR processing and handler change */ +extern struct mutex ir_raw_handler_lock; +/* macros for IR decoders */ static inline bool geq_margin (unsigned d1,unsigned d2,unsigned margin) {@@ -288,6 +297,7 @@ void ir_lirc_raw_event(struct rc_dev *dev, struct ir_raw_event ev);void ir_lirc_scancode_event (struct rc_dev *dev,struct lirc_scancode *lsc);int ir_lirc_register (struct rc_dev *dev);void ir_lirc_unregister (struct rc_dev *dev); +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd (int fd);#else static inline int lirc_dev_init (void ) {return 0 ; }static inline void lirc_dev_exit (void ) {}@@ -299,4 +309,18 @@ static inline int ir_lirc_register(struct rc_dev *dev) { return 0; }static inline void ir_lirc_unregister (struct rc_dev *dev) { }#endif +/* +* bpf interface +*/ +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *dev); +void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *dev); +void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *dev,struct ir_raw_event ev); +#else +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *dev) { } +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *dev) { } +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *dev,struct ir_raw_event ev) +{ } +#endif +#endif /* _RC_CORE_PRIV */ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c +12
-2@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@static LIST_HEAD (ir_raw_client_list);/* Used to handle IR raw handler extensions */ -static DEFINE_MUTEX (ir_raw_handler_lock); +DEFINE_MUTEX (ir_raw_handler_lock);static LIST_HEAD (ir_raw_handler_list);static atomic64_t available_protocols =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 );@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int ir_raw_event_thread(void *data) handler->protocols || !handler->protocols) handler->decode (raw->dev, ev);ir_lirc_raw_event (raw->dev, ev); +rc_dev_bpf_run (raw->dev, ev); raw->prev_ev = ev; }mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock);@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ int ir_raw_event_prepare(struct rc_dev *dev)spin_lock_init (&dev->raw->edge_spinlock);timer_setup (&dev->raw->edge_handle, ir_raw_edge_handle,0 );INIT_KFIFO (dev->raw->kfifo); +rc_dev_bpf_init (dev);return 0 ; }@@ -621,9 +623,17 @@ void ir_raw_event_unregister(struct rc_dev *dev)list_for_each_entry (handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list)if (handler->raw_unregister) handler->raw_unregister (dev); -mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); + +rc_dev_bpf_free (dev);ir_raw_event_free (dev); + +/* +* A user can be calling bpf(BPF_PROG_{QUERY|ATTACH|DETACH}), so +* ensure that the raw member is null on unlock; this is how +* "device gone" is checked. +*/ +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); }/* include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h new file +30
-0@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _BPF_RCDEV_H +#define _BPF_RCDEV_H + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr); +int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr); +int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr,union bpf_attr __user *uattr); +#else +static inline int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static inline int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static inline int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr, +union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +#endif + +#endif /* _BPF_RCDEV_H */ include/linux/bpf_types.h +3
-0@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, raw_tracepoint)#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE, cg_dev)#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, rawir_event) +#endif BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, array_map_ops)BPF_MAP_TYPE (BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY , percpu_array_map_ops)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +54
-1@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR , + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, }; enum bpf_attach_type {@@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT ,BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND ,BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND , +BPF_RAWIR_EVENT , __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE };@@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {* egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now. * Return * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error. +* +* int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle) +* Description +* Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in +* BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully +* decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event, +* and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded +* protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum). +* +* Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button +* was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes, +* copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) +* +* int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx) +* Description +* Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like +* NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button, +* in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is +* not repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -1976,7 +2007,9 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (fib_lookup), \FN (sock_hash_update), \FN (msg_redirect_hash), \ -FN (sk_redirect_hash), +FN (sk_redirect_hash), \ +FN (rc_repeat), \ +FN (rc_keydown),/* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper * function eBPF program intends to call @@ -2043,6 +2076,26 @@ enum bpf_hdr_start_off { BPF_HDR_START_NET, }; +/* +* user accessible mirror of in-kernel ir_raw_event +*/ +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE 0 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE 1 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT 2 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET 3 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER 4 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_DUTY_CYCLE 5 + +struct bpf_rawir_event { +union { +__u32 duration; +__u32 carrier; +__u32 duty_cycle; + }; + +__u32 type; +}; +/* user accessible mirror of in-kernel sk_buff. * new fields can only be added to the end of this structure */ kernel/bpf/syscall.c +7
-1@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@*/ #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h> #include <linux/btf.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -1567,6 +1568,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER :case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT :return sockmap_get_from_fd (attr,BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB , true); +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_attach (attr);default :return -EINVAL ; }@@ -1637,6 +1640,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER :case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT :return sockmap_get_from_fd (attr,BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB , false); +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_detach (attr);default :return -EINVAL ; }@@ -1684,6 +1689,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,case BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS :case BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE :break ; +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_query (attr, uattr);default :return -EINVAL ; } --2.17.0
Sean Young
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
Hi,
Again thanks for a thoughtful review. This will definitely will improve the code.
Quoted 287 lines · Y Song
Quoted 286 lines · Sean Young
Add support for
BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can callrc_keydown()to reported decoded IR scancodes, orrc_repeat()to report that the last key should be repeated.The bpf program can be attached to using the
bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH)syscall; thetarget_fdmust be the/dev/lircNdevice.Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.hdrivers/media/rc/Kconfig +13
-0@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ config LIRC passes raw IR to and from userspace, which is needed for IR transmitting (aka "blasting") and for the lirc daemon. +config BPF_RAWIR_EVENT + bool "Support for eBPF programs attached to lirc devices" + depends on BPF_SYSCALL + depends on RC_CORE=y + depends on LIRC + help + Allow attaching eBPF programs to a lirc device using the bpf(2) + syscall command BPF_PROG_ATTACH. This is supported for raw IR + receivers. + + These eBPF programs can be used to decode IR into scancodes, for + IR protocols not supported by the kernel decoders. + menuconfig RC_DECODERS bool "Remote controller decoders" depends on RC_COREdrivers/media/rc/Makefile +1
-0@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-y += keymaps/ obj-$(CONFIG_RC_CORE) += rc-core.o rc-core-y := rc-main.o rc-ir-raw.o rc-core-$(CONFIG_LIRC) += lirc_dev.o +rc-core-$(CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT) += bpf-rawir-event.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_NEC_DECODER) += ir-nec-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC5_DECODER) += ir-rc5-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC6_DECODER) += ir-rc6-decoder.odrivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +221
-0@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// bpf-rawir-event.c - handles bpf +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/filter.h> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h> +#include "rc-core-priv.h" + +/* +* BPF interface for raw IR +*/ +const struct bpf_prog_ops rawir_event_prog_ops = { +}; + +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_rc_repeat, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl; + + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event); + +rc_repeat (ctrl->dev); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_repeat_proto = { + .func = bpf_rc_repeat, + .gpl_only = true,/* rc_repeat is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */ + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_rc_keydown, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event, u32, protocol, + u32, scancode, u32, toggle) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl; + + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event); + +rc_keydown (ctrl->dev, protocol, scancode, toggle !=0 ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_keydown_proto = { + .func = bpf_rc_keydown, + .gpl_only = true,/* rc_keydown is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */ + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , + .arg2_type =ARG_ANYTHING , + .arg3_type =ARG_ANYTHING , + .arg4_type =ARG_ANYTHING , +}; + +static const struct bpf_func_proto * +rawir_event_func_proto (enum bpf_func_id func_id,const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +switch (func_id) { +case BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat: +return &rc_repeat_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown: +return &rc_keydown_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem: +return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem: +return &bpf_map_update_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem: +return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns: +return &bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_tail_call: +return &bpf_tail_call_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32: +return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk: +if (capable (CAP_SYS_ADMIN )) +return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto (); +/* fall through */ +default : +return NULL ; + } +} + +static bool rawir_event_is_valid_access (int off,int size, +enum bpf_access_type type, +const struct bpf_prog *prog, +struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info) +{ +/* struct bpf_rawir_event has two u32 fields */ +if (type ==BPF_WRITE ) +return false; + +if (size !=sizeof (__u32)) +return false; + +if (!(off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event , duration) || + off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event , type))) +return false; + +return true; +} + +const struct bpf_verifier_ops rawir_event_verifier_ops = { + .get_func_proto = rawir_event_func_proto, + .is_valid_access = rawir_event_is_valid_access +}; + +#define BPF_MAX_PROGS 64 + +static int rc_dev_bpf_attach (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; +int ret, size; + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) +return ret; + + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + size =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) { +if (pl->prog == prog) { + ret = -EEXIST ; + goto out; + } + + size++; + } + +if (size >=BPF_MAX_PROGS ) { + ret = -E2BIG ; + goto out; + } + + pl =kmalloc (sizeof (*pl),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pl) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out; + } + + pl->prog = prog; +list_add (&pl->node, &raw->progs); +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +return ret; +} + +static int rc_dev_bpf_detach (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp; +int ret; + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) +return ret; + + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + ret = -ENOENT ; + +list_for_each_entry_safe (pl, tmp, &raw->progs, node) { +if (pl->prog == prog) { +list_del (&pl->node); +kfree (pl); +bpf_prog_put (prog); + ret =0 ; + goto out; + } + } +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +return ret; +} + +void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *rcdev) +{ +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&rcdev->raw->progs); +} + +void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct ir_raw_event ev) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw = rcdev->raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; + +if (list_empty (&raw->progs)) +return ; + +if (unlikely (ev.carrier_report)) { + raw->bpf_rawir_event.carrier = ev.carrier; + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER ; + }else { + raw->bpf_rawir_event.duration = ev.duration; + +if (ev.pulse) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE ; +else if (ev.timeout) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT ; +else if (ev.reset) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET ; +else + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE ; + }
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 224
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +3
-0+ +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) +BPF_PROG_RUN (pl->prog, &raw->bpf_rawir_event);Is the
raw->progsprotected by locks? It is possible that attaching/detaching could manipulateraw->progsat the same time? In perf/cgroup prog array case, the prog array run is protected by rcu and the dummy prog idea is to avoid the prog is skipped by reshuffling.
Yes, it is. The caller takes the appropriate lock. These functions could do with some comments.
Quoted 2 lines
Also, the original idea about using prog array is the least overhead since you want to BPF programs to execute as soon as possible.
Now, for our purposes the we're not bothered by a few milliseconds delay, so I would pick whatever uses less cpu/memory overall. There is some overhead in using rcu but the array is nice since it uses less memory than the double-linked list, and less cache misses.
So I wanted bpf_prog_detach() to return -ENOENT if the prog was not in the list, however bpf_prog_array_copy() and bpf_prog_array_delete_safe() do not return anything useful for that.
Maybe I should look at adding a count-delta return to bpf_prog_array_copy(), and a bool return to bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(). Or I could scan the array an extra time to see if it is present. Any other ideas?
Also, BPF_F_OVERRIDE is not relevant for this but possibly BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI could invoke the same behaviour as for cgroups. What do you think?
Quoted 83 lines
Quoted 83 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +83
-0+} + +void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *rcdev) +{ +struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp; + +list_for_each_entry_safe (pl, tmp, &rcdev->raw->progs, node) { +list_del (&pl->node); +bpf_prog_put (pl->prog); +kfree (pl); + } +} + +int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +struct bpf_prog *prog; +struct rc_dev *rcdev; +int ret; + +if (attr->attach_flags) +return -EINVAL ; + + prog =bpf_prog_get_type (attr->attach_bpf_fd, +BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT ); +if (IS_ERR (prog)) +return PTR_ERR (prog); + + rcdev =rc_dev_get_from_fd (attr->target_fd); +if (IS_ERR (rcdev)) { +bpf_prog_put (prog); +return PTR_ERR (rcdev); + } + + ret =rc_dev_bpf_attach (rcdev, prog); +if (ret) +bpf_prog_put (prog); + +put_device (&rcdev->dev); + +return ret; +} + +int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +struct bpf_prog *prog; +struct rc_dev *rcdev; +int ret; + +if (attr->attach_flags) +return -EINVAL ; + + prog =bpf_prog_get_type (attr->attach_bpf_fd, +BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT ); +if (IS_ERR (prog)) +return PTR_ERR (prog); + + rcdev =rc_dev_get_from_fd (attr->target_fd); +if (IS_ERR (rcdev)) { +bpf_prog_put (prog); +return PTR_ERR (rcdev); + } + + ret =rc_dev_bpf_detach (rcdev, prog); + +bpf_prog_put (prog); +put_device (&rcdev->dev); + +return ret; +} + +int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr,union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ +__u32 __user *prog_ids =u64_to_user_ptr (attr->query.prog_ids); +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; +struct rc_dev *rcdev; +u32 cnt, flags =0 , *ids, i; +int ret; + +if (attr->query.query_flags) +return -EINVAL ; + + rcdev =rc_dev_get_from_fd (attr->query.target_fd);
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 313
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +6
-0+if (IS_ERR (rcdev)) +return PTR_ERR (rcdev); + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto out;
mutex_lock_interruptible()has not been called. You can just return here.
Yep.
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 128
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +5
-0+ } + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) + goto out;Maybe you can rename label "out" to "unlock" since it is really an unlock and out?
Good point.
Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 33 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +33
-0+ + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + cnt =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) + cnt++; + +if (copy_to_user (&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &cnt,sizeof (cnt))) { + ret = -EFAULT ; + goto out; + } +if (copy_to_user (&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags,sizeof (flags))) { + ret = -EFAULT ; + goto out; + } + +if (attr->query.prog_cnt !=0 && prog_ids && cnt) { +if (attr->query.prog_cnt < cnt) + cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt; + + ids =kmalloc_array (cnt,sizeof (u32),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!ids) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out; + } + + i =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) { + ids[i++] = pl->prog->aux->id;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 356
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +5
-0+if (i == cnt) +break ; + } + + ret =copy_to_user (prog_ids, ids, cnt *sizeof (u32));Do you want to give user a chance to know that the "cnt" is not big enough by return
-ENOSPCif cnt is smaller than the number of progs in the array?
True.
Quoted 342 lines
Quoted 342 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +7
-0+ } +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +put_device (&rcdev->dev); + +return ret; +}drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c +24
-0@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/file.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/poll.h> #include <linux/sched.h> @@ -816,4 +817,27 @@ void __exit lirc_dev_exit(void)unregister_chrdev_region (lirc_base_dev,RC_DEV_MAX ); } +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd (int fd) +{ +struct fd f =fdget (fd); +struct lirc_fh *fh; +struct rc_dev *dev; + +if (!f.file) +return ERR_PTR (-EBADF ); + +if (f.file->f_op != &lirc_fops) { +fdput (f); +return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); + } + + fh = f.file->private_data; + dev = fh->rc; + +get_device (&dev->dev); +fdput (f); + +return dev; +} +MODULE_ALIAS ("lirc_dev" );drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h +24
-0@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@#define MAX_IR_EVENT_SIZE 512#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h> #include <media/rc-core.h> /** @@ -57,6 +58,11 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl {/* raw decoder state follows */ struct ir_raw_event prev_ev;struct ir_raw_event this_ev; + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +struct bpf_rawir_event bpf_rawir_event; +struct list_head progs; +#endif struct nec_dec {int state;unsigned count;@@ -126,6 +132,9 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl { } imon; }; +/* Mutex for locking raw IR processing and handler change */ +extern struct mutex ir_raw_handler_lock; +/* macros for IR decoders */ static inline bool geq_margin (unsigned d1,unsigned d2,unsigned margin) {@@ -288,6 +297,7 @@ void ir_lirc_raw_event(struct rc_dev *dev, struct ir_raw_event ev);void ir_lirc_scancode_event (struct rc_dev *dev,struct lirc_scancode *lsc);int ir_lirc_register (struct rc_dev *dev);void ir_lirc_unregister (struct rc_dev *dev); +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd (int fd);#else static inline int lirc_dev_init (void ) {return 0 ; }static inline void lirc_dev_exit (void ) {}@@ -299,4 +309,18 @@ static inline int ir_lirc_register(struct rc_dev *dev) { return 0; }static inline void ir_lirc_unregister (struct rc_dev *dev) { }#endif +/* +* bpf interface +*/ +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *dev); +void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *dev); +void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *dev,struct ir_raw_event ev); +#else +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *dev) { } +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_free (struct rc_dev *dev) { } +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *dev,struct ir_raw_event ev) +{ } +#endif +#endif /* _RC_CORE_PRIV */ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c +12
-2@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@static LIST_HEAD (ir_raw_client_list);/* Used to handle IR raw handler extensions */ -static DEFINE_MUTEX (ir_raw_handler_lock); +DEFINE_MUTEX (ir_raw_handler_lock);static LIST_HEAD (ir_raw_handler_list);static atomic64_t available_protocols =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 );@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int ir_raw_event_thread(void *data) handler->protocols || !handler->protocols) handler->decode (raw->dev, ev);ir_lirc_raw_event (raw->dev, ev); +rc_dev_bpf_run (raw->dev, ev); raw->prev_ev = ev; }mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock);@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ int ir_raw_event_prepare(struct rc_dev *dev)spin_lock_init (&dev->raw->edge_spinlock);timer_setup (&dev->raw->edge_handle, ir_raw_edge_handle,0 );INIT_KFIFO (dev->raw->kfifo); +rc_dev_bpf_init (dev);return 0 ; }@@ -621,9 +623,17 @@ void ir_raw_event_unregister(struct rc_dev *dev)list_for_each_entry (handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list)if (handler->raw_unregister) handler->raw_unregister (dev); -mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); + +rc_dev_bpf_free (dev);ir_raw_event_free (dev); + +/* +* A user can be calling bpf(BPF_PROG_{QUERY|ATTACH|DETACH}), so +* ensure that the raw member is null on unlock; this is how +* "device gone" is checked. +*/ +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); }/* include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h new file +30
-0@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _BPF_RCDEV_H +#define _BPF_RCDEV_H + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr); +int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr); +int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr,union bpf_attr __user *uattr); +#else +static inline int rc_dev_prog_attach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static inline int rc_dev_prog_detach (const union bpf_attr *attr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} + +static inline int rc_dev_prog_query (const union bpf_attr *attr, +union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ +return -EINVAL ; +} +#endif + +#endif /* _BPF_RCDEV_H */ include/linux/bpf_types.h +3
-0@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, raw_tracepoint)#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE, cg_dev)#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, rawir_event) +#endif BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, array_map_ops)BPF_MAP_TYPE (BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY , percpu_array_map_ops)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +54
-1@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR , + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, }; enum bpf_attach_type {@@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT ,BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND ,BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND , +BPF_RAWIR_EVENT , __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE };@@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {* egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now. * Return * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error. +* +* int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle) +* Description +* Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in +* BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully +* decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event, +* and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded +* protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum). +* +* Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button +* was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes, +* copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) +* +* int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx) +* Description +* Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like +* NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button, +* in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is +* not repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -1976,7 +2007,9 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (fib_lookup), \FN (sock_hash_update), \FN (msg_redirect_hash), \ -FN (sk_redirect_hash), +FN (sk_redirect_hash), \ +FN (rc_repeat), \ +FN (rc_keydown),/* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper * function eBPF program intends to call @@ -2043,6 +2076,26 @@ enum bpf_hdr_start_off { BPF_HDR_START_NET, }; +/* +* user accessible mirror of in-kernel ir_raw_event +*/ +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE 0 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE 1 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT 2 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET 3 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER 4 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_DUTY_CYCLE 5 + +struct bpf_rawir_event { +union { +__u32 duration; +__u32 carrier; +__u32 duty_cycle; + }; + +__u32 type; +}; +/* user accessible mirror of in-kernel sk_buff. * new fields can only be added to the end of this structure */ kernel/bpf/syscall.c +7
-1@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@*/ #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h> #include <linux/btf.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -1567,6 +1568,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER :case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT :return sockmap_get_from_fd (attr,BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB , true); +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_attach (attr);default :return -EINVAL ; }@@ -1637,6 +1640,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER :case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT :return sockmap_get_from_fd (attr,BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB , false); +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_detach (attr);default :return -EINVAL ; }@@ -1684,6 +1689,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,case BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS :case BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE :break ; +case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT : +return rc_dev_prog_query (attr, uattr);default :return -EINVAL ; } --2.17.0
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT
Quoted 313 lines · Sean Young
Hi,
Again thanks for a thoughtful review. This will definitely will improve the code.
Quoted 287 lines · Y Song
Quoted 286 lines · Sean Young
Add support for
BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can callrc_keydown()to reported decoded IR scancodes, orrc_repeat()to report that the last key should be repeated.The bpf program can be attached to using the
bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH)syscall; thetarget_fdmust be the/dev/lircNdevice.Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++ drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +- include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++ include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 + 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.hdrivers/media/rc/Kconfig +13
-0@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ config LIRC passes raw IR to and from userspace, which is needed for IR transmitting (aka "blasting") and for the lirc daemon. +config BPF_RAWIR_EVENT + bool "Support for eBPF programs attached to lirc devices" + depends on BPF_SYSCALL + depends on RC_CORE=y + depends on LIRC + help + Allow attaching eBPF programs to a lirc device using the bpf(2) + syscall command BPF_PROG_ATTACH. This is supported for raw IR + receivers. + + These eBPF programs can be used to decode IR into scancodes, for + IR protocols not supported by the kernel decoders. + menuconfig RC_DECODERS bool "Remote controller decoders" depends on RC_COREdrivers/media/rc/Makefile +1
-0@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-y += keymaps/ obj-$(CONFIG_RC_CORE) += rc-core.o rc-core-y := rc-main.o rc-ir-raw.o rc-core-$(CONFIG_LIRC) += lirc_dev.o +rc-core-$(CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT) += bpf-rawir-event.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_NEC_DECODER) += ir-nec-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC5_DECODER) += ir-rc5-decoder.o obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC6_DECODER) += ir-rc6-decoder.odrivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +221
-0@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// bpf-rawir-event.c - handles bpf +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/filter.h> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h> +#include "rc-core-priv.h" + +/* +* BPF interface for raw IR +*/ +const struct bpf_prog_ops rawir_event_prog_ops = { +}; + +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_rc_repeat, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl; + + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event); + +rc_repeat (ctrl->dev); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_repeat_proto = { + .func = bpf_rc_repeat, + .gpl_only = true,/* rc_repeat is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */ + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_rc_keydown, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event, u32, protocol, + u32, scancode, u32, toggle) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl; + + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event); + +rc_keydown (ctrl->dev, protocol, scancode, toggle !=0 ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_keydown_proto = { + .func = bpf_rc_keydown, + .gpl_only = true,/* rc_keydown is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */ + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , + .arg2_type =ARG_ANYTHING , + .arg3_type =ARG_ANYTHING , + .arg4_type =ARG_ANYTHING , +}; + +static const struct bpf_func_proto * +rawir_event_func_proto (enum bpf_func_id func_id,const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +switch (func_id) { +case BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat: +return &rc_repeat_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown: +return &rc_keydown_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem: +return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem: +return &bpf_map_update_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem: +return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns: +return &bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_tail_call: +return &bpf_tail_call_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32: +return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk: +if (capable (CAP_SYS_ADMIN )) +return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto (); +/* fall through */ +default : +return NULL ; + } +} + +static bool rawir_event_is_valid_access (int off,int size, +enum bpf_access_type type, +const struct bpf_prog *prog, +struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info) +{ +/* struct bpf_rawir_event has two u32 fields */ +if (type ==BPF_WRITE ) +return false; + +if (size !=sizeof (__u32)) +return false; + +if (!(off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event , duration) || + off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event , type))) +return false; + +return true; +} + +const struct bpf_verifier_ops rawir_event_verifier_ops = { + .get_func_proto = rawir_event_func_proto, + .is_valid_access = rawir_event_is_valid_access +}; + +#define BPF_MAX_PROGS 64 + +static int rc_dev_bpf_attach (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; +int ret, size; + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) +return ret; + + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + size =0 ; +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) { +if (pl->prog == prog) { + ret = -EEXIST ; + goto out; + } + + size++; + } + +if (size >=BPF_MAX_PROGS ) { + ret = -E2BIG ; + goto out; + } + + pl =kmalloc (sizeof (*pl),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pl) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out; + } + + pl->prog = prog; +list_add (&pl->node, &raw->progs); +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +return ret; +} + +static int rc_dev_bpf_detach (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp; +int ret; + +if (rcdev->driver_type !=RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =mutex_lock_interruptible (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +if (ret) +return ret; + + raw = rcdev->raw; +if (!raw) { + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + + ret = -ENOENT ; + +list_for_each_entry_safe (pl, tmp, &raw->progs, node) { +if (pl->prog == prog) { +list_del (&pl->node); +kfree (pl); +bpf_prog_put (prog); + ret =0 ; + goto out; + } + } +out: +mutex_unlock (&ir_raw_handler_lock); +return ret; +} + +void rc_dev_bpf_init (struct rc_dev *rcdev) +{ +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&rcdev->raw->progs); +} + +void rc_dev_bpf_run (struct rc_dev *rcdev,struct ir_raw_event ev) +{ +struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw = rcdev->raw; +struct bpf_prog_list *pl; + +if (list_empty (&raw->progs)) +return ; + +if (unlikely (ev.carrier_report)) { + raw->bpf_rawir_event.carrier = ev.carrier; + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER ; + }else { + raw->bpf_rawir_event.duration = ev.duration; + +if (ev.pulse) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE ; +else if (ev.timeout) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT ; +else if (ev.reset) + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET ; +else + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type =BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE ; + }Quoted 8 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c line 224
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c new file +3
-0+ +list_for_each_entry (pl, &raw->progs, node) +BPF_PROG_RUN (pl->prog, &raw->bpf_rawir_event);Is the
raw->progsprotected by locks? It is possible that attaching/detaching could manipulateraw->progsat the same time? In perf/cgroup prog array case, the prog array run is protected by rcu and the dummy prog idea is to avoid the prog is skipped by reshuffling.Yes, it is. The caller takes the appropriate lock. These functions could do with some comments.
Quoted 2 lines
Also, the original idea about using prog array is the least overhead since you want to BPF programs to execute as soon as possible.
Now, for our purposes the we're not bothered by a few milliseconds delay, so I would pick whatever uses less cpu/memory overall. There is some overhead in using rcu but the array is nice since it uses less memory than the double-linked list, and less cache misses.
Quoted 7 lines
So I wanted
bpf_prog_detach()to return-ENOENTif the prog was not in the list, howeverbpf_prog_array_copy()andbpf_prog_array_delete_safe()do not return anything useful for that.Maybe I should look at adding a count-delta return to
bpf_prog_array_copy(), and a bool return tobpf_prog_array_delete_safe(). Or I could scan the array an extra time to see if it is present. Any other ideas?
The detaching is not performance critical. Either of these methods is fine. A bool return to bpf_prog_array_delete_safe() seems easy to make a change.
Quoted 3 lines
Also,
BPF_F_OVERRIDEis not relevant for this but possiblyBPF_F_ALLOW_MULTIcould invoke the same behaviour as for cgroups. What do you think?
Looks like you already allow multiple programs attaching to the same device? So by default you already implied supporting BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI, but you just did not specify it. I think this is fine. perf event also supports program array
by default and users do not need to specify flags.
Or I misunderstood your question?
Sean Young
maintainerPATCH v3 2/2 bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
In reply to Sean YoungThis is simple test over rc-loopback.
--- tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 +++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c +1 -0
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static const char * const prog_type_name[] = { [BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG] = "sk_msg", [BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT] = "raw_tracepoint", [BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR] = "cgroup_sock_addr", + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT] = "rawir_event", };static void print_boot_time (__u64 nsecs,char *buf,unsigned int size)
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +55 -2
99 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +1 -0
@@ -1455,6 +1455,7 @@ static bool bpf_prog_type__needs_kver(enum bpf_prog_type type)case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR : +case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT :return false;case BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE :
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +5 -3
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ urandom_read: urandom_read.c # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order TEST_GEN_PROGS = test_verifier test_tag test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map test_progs \ test_align test_verifier_log test_dev_cgroup test_tcpbpf_user \ - test_sock test_btf test_sockmap + test_sock test_btf test_sockmap test_rawir_event_user TEST_GEN_FILES = test_pkt_access.o test_xdp.o test_l4lb.o test_tcp_estats.o test_obj_id.o \ test_pkt_md_access.o test_xdp_redirect.o test_xdp_meta.o sockmap_parse_prog.o \
@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES = test_pkt_access.o test_xdp.o test_l4lb.o test_tcp_estats.o test sample_map_ret0.o test_tcpbpf_kern.o test_stacktrace_build_id.o \ sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.o connect4_prog.o connect6_prog.o test_adjust_tail.o \ test_btf_haskv.o test_btf_nokv.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_tunnel_kern.o \ - test_get_stack_rawtp.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_sockhash_kern.o + test_get_stack_rawtp.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_sockhash_kern.o \ + test_rawir_event_kern.o # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \
@@ -42,7 +43,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \ test_xdp_meta.sh \ test_offload.py \ test_sock_addr.sh \ - test_tunnel.sh + test_tunnel.sh \ + test_rawir.sh # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests' TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = test_libbpf_open test_sock_addr
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h +6 -0
@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ static int (*bpf_get_stack)(void *ctx, void *buf, int size, int flags) =static int (*bpf_fib_lookup)(void *ctx,struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,int plen,__u32 flags) = (void *) BPF_FUNC_fib_lookup; +static int (*bpf_rc_repeat)(void *ctx) = + (void *) BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat; +static int (*bpf_rc_keydown)(void *ctx,unsigned int protocol, +unsigned int scancode,unsigned int toggle) = + (void *) BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown; +/* llvm builtin functions that eBPF C program may use to * emit BPF_LD_ABS and BPF_LD_IND instructions
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh new file +37 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +# Test bpf_rawir_event over rc-loopback. Steps for the test: +# +# 1. Find the /dev/lircN device for rc-loopback +# 2. Attach bpf_rawir_event program which decodes some IR. +# 3. Send some IR to the same IR device; since it is loopback, this will +# end up in the bpf program +# 4. bpf program should decode IR and report keycode +# 5. We can read keycode from same /dev/lirc device + +GREEN='\033[0;92m' +RED='\033[0;31m' +NC='\033[0m' # No Color + +modprobe rc-loopback + +for i in /sys/class/rc/rc* +do + if grep -q DRV_NAME=rc-loopback $i/uevent + then + LIRCDEV=$(grep DEVNAME= $i/lirc*/uevent | sed sQDEVNAME=Q/dev/Q) + fi +done + +if [ -n $LIRCDEV ]; +then + TYPE=rawir_event + ./test_rawir_event_user $LIRCDEV + ret=$? + if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then + echo -e ${RED}"FAIL: $TYPE"${NC} + else + echo -e ${GREEN}"PASS: $TYPE"${NC} + fi +fi
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c new file +26 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// test ir decoder +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include "bpf_helpers.h" + +SEC("rawir_event") +int bpf_decoder (struct bpf_rawir_event *e) +{ +if (e->type ==BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE ) { +/* +* The lirc interface is microseconds, but here we receive +* nanoseconds. +*/ +int microseconds = e->duration /1000 ; + +if (microseconds &0x10000 ) +bpf_rc_keydown (e,0x40 , microseconds &0xffff ,0 ); + } + +return 0 ; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c new file +130 -0
130 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
Quoted 16 lines · Sean Young
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 +++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c
Could you copy include/uapi/linux/lirc.h file to tools directory as well. Otherwise, I will get the following compilation error:
gcc -Wall -O2 -I../../../include/uapi -I../../../lib -I../../../lib/bpf -I../../../../include/generated -I../../../include
test_rawir_event_user.c/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libbpf.a -lcap -lelf -lrt -lpthread -o /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user test_rawir_event_user.c: In function ‘main’:
test_rawir_event_user.c:60:15: error: ‘LIRC_MODE_SCANCODE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘LIRC_MODE_LIRCCODE’?
mode = LIRC_MODE_SCANCODE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LIRC_MODE_LIRCCODE
test_rawir_event_user.c:60:15: note: each undeclared identifier is
reported only once for each function it appears in
test_rawir_event_user.c:93:29: error: storage size of ‘lsc’ isn’t known
struct lirc_scancode lsc;
^~~test_rawir_event_user.c:93:29: warning: unused variable ‘lsc’ [-Wunused-variable]
Quoted 292 lines
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c +1
-0@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static const char * const prog_type_name[] = { [BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG] = "sk_msg", [BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT] = "raw_tracepoint", [BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR] = "cgroup_sock_addr", + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT] = "rawir_event", };static void print_boot_time (__u64 nsecs,char *buf,unsigned int size)tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +55
-2@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR , + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, }; enum bpf_attach_type {@@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT ,BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND ,BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND , +BPF_RAWIR_EVENT , __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE };@@ -1829,7 +1831,6 @@ union bpf_attr {* Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. * -* * int bpf_fib_lookup(void *ctx, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params, int plen, u32 flags) * Description * Do FIB lookup in kernel tables using parameters in *params*. @@ -1856,6 +1857,7 @@ union bpf_attr {* Egress device index on success, 0 if packet needs to continue * up the stack for further processing or a negative error in case * of failure. +* * int bpf_sock_hash_update(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops, struct bpf_map *map, void *key, u64 flags) * Description * Add an entry to, or update a sockhash *map* referencing sockets. @@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {* egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now. * Return * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error. +* +* int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle) +* Description +* Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in +* BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully +* decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event, +* and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded +* protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum). +* +* Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button +* was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes, +* copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) +* +* int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx) +* Description +* Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like +* NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button, +* in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is +* not repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -1976,7 +2007,9 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (fib_lookup), \FN (sock_hash_update), \FN (msg_redirect_hash), \ -FN (sk_redirect_hash), +FN (sk_redirect_hash), \ +FN (rc_repeat), \ +FN (rc_keydown),/* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper * function eBPF program intends to call @@ -2043,6 +2076,26 @@ enum bpf_hdr_start_off { BPF_HDR_START_NET, }; +/* +* user accessible mirror of in-kernel ir_raw_event +*/ +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE 0 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE 1 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT 2 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET 3 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER 4 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_DUTY_CYCLE 5 + +struct bpf_rawir_event { +union { +__u32 duration; +__u32 carrier; +__u32 duty_cycle; + }; + +__u32 type; +}; +/* user accessible mirror of in-kernel sk_buff. * new fields can only be added to the end of this structure */ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +1
-0@@ -1455,6 +1455,7 @@ static bool bpf_prog_type__needs_kver(enum bpf_prog_type type)case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR : +case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT :return false;case BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE :tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +5
-3@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ urandom_read: urandom_read.c # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order TEST_GEN_PROGS = test_verifier test_tag test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map test_progs \ test_align test_verifier_log test_dev_cgroup test_tcpbpf_user \ - test_sock test_btf test_sockmap + test_sock test_btf test_sockmap test_rawir_event_user TEST_GEN_FILES = test_pkt_access.o test_xdp.o test_l4lb.o test_tcp_estats.o test_obj_id.o \ test_pkt_md_access.o test_xdp_redirect.o test_xdp_meta.o sockmap_parse_prog.o \@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES = test_pkt_access.o test_xdp.o test_l4lb.o test_tcp_estats.o test sample_map_ret0.o test_tcpbpf_kern.o test_stacktrace_build_id.o \ sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.o connect4_prog.o connect6_prog.o test_adjust_tail.o \ test_btf_haskv.o test_btf_nokv.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_tunnel_kern.o \ - test_get_stack_rawtp.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_sockhash_kern.o + test_get_stack_rawtp.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_sockhash_kern.o \ + test_rawir_event_kern.o # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \@@ -42,7 +43,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \ test_xdp_meta.sh \ test_offload.py \ test_sock_addr.sh \ - test_tunnel.sh + test_tunnel.sh \ + test_rawir.sh # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests' TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = test_libbpf_open test_sock_addrtools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h +6
-0@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ static int (*bpf_get_stack)(void *ctx, void *buf, int size, int flags) =static int (*bpf_fib_lookup)(void *ctx,struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,int plen,__u32 flags) = (void *) BPF_FUNC_fib_lookup; +static int (*bpf_rc_repeat)(void *ctx) = + (void *) BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat; +static int (*bpf_rc_keydown)(void *ctx,unsigned int protocol, +unsigned int scancode,unsigned int toggle) = + (void *) BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown; +/* llvm builtin functions that eBPF C program may use to * emit BPF_LD_ABS and BPF_LD_IND instructions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh new file +37
-0@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +# Test bpf_rawir_event over rc-loopback. Steps for the test: +# +# 1. Find the /dev/lircN device for rc-loopback +# 2. Attach bpf_rawir_event program which decodes some IR. +# 3. Send some IR to the same IR device; since it is loopback, this will +# end up in the bpf program +# 4. bpf program should decode IR and report keycode +# 5. We can read keycode from same /dev/lirc device + +GREEN='\033[0;92m' +RED='\033[0;31m' +NC='\033[0m' # No Color + +modprobe rc-loopback + +for i in /sys/class/rc/rc* +do + if grep -q DRV_NAME=rc-loopback $i/uevent + then + LIRCDEV=$(grep DEVNAME= $i/lirc*/uevent | sed sQDEVNAME=Q/dev/Q) + fi +done + +if [ -n $LIRCDEV ]; +then + TYPE=rawir_event + ./test_rawir_event_user $LIRCDEV + ret=$? + if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then + echo -e ${RED}"FAIL: $TYPE"${NC} + else + echo -e ${GREEN}"PASS: $TYPE"${NC} + fi +fitools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c new file +26
-0@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// test ir decoder +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include "bpf_helpers.h" + +SEC("rawir_event") +int bpf_decoder (struct bpf_rawir_event *e) +{ +if (e->type ==BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE ) { +/* +* The lirc interface is microseconds, but here we receive +* nanoseconds. +*/ +int microseconds = e->duration /1000 ; + +if (microseconds &0x10000 ) +bpf_rc_keydown (e,0x40 , microseconds &0xffff ,0 ); + } + +return 0 ; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c new file +26
-0@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// test ir decoder +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/lirc.h> +#include <assert.h> +#include <errno.h> +#include <signal.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <poll.h> +#include <libgen.h> +#include <sys/resource.h> +#include <sys/types.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <sys/stat.h> +#include <fcntl.h> + +#include "bpf_util.h" +#include <bpf/bpf.h> +#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c line 36
Quoted 10 lines
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c new file +10
-0+ +int main (int argc,char **argv) +{ +struct bpf_object *obj; +int ret, lircfd, progfd, mode; +int testir =0x1dead ; +u32 prog_ids[10 ], prog_flags[10 ], prog_cnt; + +if (argc !=2 ) { +printf ("Usage: %s /dev/lircN\n" , argv[0 ]);
Most people probably not really familiar with lircN device. It would be good to provide more information about how to enable this, e.g.,
CONFIG_RC_CORE=y
CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT=y
CONFIG_RC_LOOPBACK=y
......
Thanks!
Sean Young
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
Quoted 38 lines · Y Song
Quoted 16 lines · Sean Young
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 +++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.cCould you copy
include/uapi/linux/lirc.hfile to tools directory as well. Otherwise, I will get the following compilation error:gcc -Wall -O2 -I../../../include/uapi -I../../../lib -I../../../lib/bpf -I../../../../include/generated -I../../../include
test_rawir_event_user.c/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libbpf.a-lcap -lelf -lrt -lpthread -o/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_usertest_rawir_event_user.c: In function ‘main’:
test_rawir_event_user.c:60:15: error: ‘LIRC_MODE_SCANCODE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘LIRC_MODE_LIRCCODE’?mode = LIRC_MODE_SCANCODE; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LIRC_MODE_LIRCCODE test_rawir_event_user.c:60:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in test_rawir_event_user.c:93:29: error: storage size of ‘lsc’ isn’t known struct lirc_scancode lsc; ^~~
Quoted 2 lines
test_rawir_event_user.c:93:29: warning: unused variable ‘lsc’ [-Wunused-variable]
Ah, good catch. Thanks for testing this.
Quoted 302 lines
Quoted 302 lines
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c +1
-0@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static const char * const prog_type_name[] = { [BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG] = "sk_msg", [BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT] = "raw_tracepoint", [BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR] = "cgroup_sock_addr", + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT] = "rawir_event", };static void print_boot_time (__u64 nsecs,char *buf,unsigned int size)tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +55
-2@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT ,BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR , + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, }; enum bpf_attach_type {@@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT ,BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND ,BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND , +BPF_RAWIR_EVENT , __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE };@@ -1829,7 +1831,6 @@ union bpf_attr {* Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. * -* * int bpf_fib_lookup(void *ctx, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params, int plen, u32 flags) * Description * Do FIB lookup in kernel tables using parameters in *params*. @@ -1856,6 +1857,7 @@ union bpf_attr {* Egress device index on success, 0 if packet needs to continue * up the stack for further processing or a negative error in case * of failure. +* * int bpf_sock_hash_update(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops, struct bpf_map *map, void *key, u64 flags) * Description * Add an entry to, or update a sockhash *map* referencing sockets. @@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {* egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now. * Return * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error. +* +* int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle) +* Description +* Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in +* BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully +* decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event, +* and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded +* protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum). +* +* Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button +* was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes, +* copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) +* +* int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx) +* Description +* Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like +* NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button, +* in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is +* not repeated. +* +* *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event. +* +* Return +* Always return 0 (for now) */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -1976,7 +2007,9 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (fib_lookup), \FN (sock_hash_update), \FN (msg_redirect_hash), \ -FN (sk_redirect_hash), +FN (sk_redirect_hash), \ +FN (rc_repeat), \ +FN (rc_keydown),/* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper * function eBPF program intends to call @@ -2043,6 +2076,26 @@ enum bpf_hdr_start_off { BPF_HDR_START_NET, }; +/* +* user accessible mirror of in-kernel ir_raw_event +*/ +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE 0 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE 1 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT 2 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET 3 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER 4 +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_DUTY_CYCLE 5 + +struct bpf_rawir_event { +union { +__u32 duration; +__u32 carrier; +__u32 duty_cycle; + }; + +__u32 type; +}; +/* user accessible mirror of in-kernel sk_buff. * new fields can only be added to the end of this structure */ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +1
-0@@ -1455,6 +1455,7 @@ static bool bpf_prog_type__needs_kver(enum bpf_prog_type type)case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR : +case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT :return false;case BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC :case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE :tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +5
-3@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ urandom_read: urandom_read.c # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order TEST_GEN_PROGS = test_verifier test_tag test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map test_progs \ test_align test_verifier_log test_dev_cgroup test_tcpbpf_user \ - test_sock test_btf test_sockmap + test_sock test_btf test_sockmap test_rawir_event_user TEST_GEN_FILES = test_pkt_access.o test_xdp.o test_l4lb.o test_tcp_estats.o test_obj_id.o \ test_pkt_md_access.o test_xdp_redirect.o test_xdp_meta.o sockmap_parse_prog.o \@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES = test_pkt_access.o test_xdp.o test_l4lb.o test_tcp_estats.o test sample_map_ret0.o test_tcpbpf_kern.o test_stacktrace_build_id.o \ sockmap_tcp_msg_prog.o connect4_prog.o connect6_prog.o test_adjust_tail.o \ test_btf_haskv.o test_btf_nokv.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_tunnel_kern.o \ - test_get_stack_rawtp.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_sockhash_kern.o + test_get_stack_rawtp.o test_sockmap_kern.o test_sockhash_kern.o \ + test_rawir_event_kern.o # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \@@ -42,7 +43,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \ test_xdp_meta.sh \ test_offload.py \ test_sock_addr.sh \ - test_tunnel.sh + test_tunnel.sh \ + test_rawir.sh # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests' TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = test_libbpf_open test_sock_addrtools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h +6
-0@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ static int (*bpf_get_stack)(void *ctx, void *buf, int size, int flags) =static int (*bpf_fib_lookup)(void *ctx,struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,int plen,__u32 flags) = (void *) BPF_FUNC_fib_lookup; +static int (*bpf_rc_repeat)(void *ctx) = + (void *) BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat; +static int (*bpf_rc_keydown)(void *ctx,unsigned int protocol, +unsigned int scancode,unsigned int toggle) = + (void *) BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown; +/* llvm builtin functions that eBPF C program may use to * emit BPF_LD_ABS and BPF_LD_IND instructions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh new file +37
-0@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +# Test bpf_rawir_event over rc-loopback. Steps for the test: +# +# 1. Find the /dev/lircN device for rc-loopback +# 2. Attach bpf_rawir_event program which decodes some IR. +# 3. Send some IR to the same IR device; since it is loopback, this will +# end up in the bpf program +# 4. bpf program should decode IR and report keycode +# 5. We can read keycode from same /dev/lirc device + +GREEN='\033[0;92m' +RED='\033[0;31m' +NC='\033[0m' # No Color + +modprobe rc-loopback + +for i in /sys/class/rc/rc* +do + if grep -q DRV_NAME=rc-loopback $i/uevent + then + LIRCDEV=$(grep DEVNAME= $i/lirc*/uevent | sed sQDEVNAME=Q/dev/Q) + fi +done + +if [ -n $LIRCDEV ]; +then + TYPE=rawir_event + ./test_rawir_event_user $LIRCDEV + ret=$? + if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then + echo -e ${RED}"FAIL: $TYPE"${NC} + else + echo -e ${GREEN}"PASS: $TYPE"${NC} + fi +fitools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c new file +26
-0@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// test ir decoder +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include "bpf_helpers.h" + +SEC("rawir_event") +int bpf_decoder (struct bpf_rawir_event *e) +{ +if (e->type ==BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE ) { +/* +* The lirc interface is microseconds, but here we receive +* nanoseconds. +*/ +int microseconds = e->duration /1000 ; + +if (microseconds &0x10000 ) +bpf_rc_keydown (e,0x40 , microseconds &0xffff ,0 ); + } + +return 0 ; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c new file +35
-0@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// test ir decoder +// +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <[email protected]> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/lirc.h> +#include <assert.h> +#include <errno.h> +#include <signal.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <poll.h> +#include <libgen.h> +#include <sys/resource.h> +#include <sys/types.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <sys/stat.h> +#include <fcntl.h> + +#include "bpf_util.h" +#include <bpf/bpf.h> +#include <bpf/libbpf.h> + +int main (int argc,char **argv) +{ +struct bpf_object *obj; +int ret, lircfd, progfd, mode; +int testir =0x1dead ; +u32 prog_ids[10 ], prog_flags[10 ], prog_cnt; + +if (argc !=2 ) {
Quoted 8 lines
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c line 36
Quoted 1 line
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c new file +1
-0+printf ("Usage: %s /dev/lircN\n" , argv[0 ]);Most people probably not really familiar with lircN device. It would be good to provide more information about how to enable this, e.g.,
CONFIG_RC_CORE=y
CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT=y
CONFIG_RC_LOOPBACK=y
......
Good point. I'll add some words explaining what is and how to make it work.
Thanks
Sean
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
2018-05-17 22:01 UTC+0100 ~ Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 18 lines · Y Song
Quoted 17 lines · Sean Young
Quoted 16 lines
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 +++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c
[...]
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Most people probably not really familiar with lircN device. It would be good to provide more information about how to enable this, e.g.,
CONFIG_RC_CORE=y
CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT=y
CONFIG_RC_LOOPBACK=y
......Good point. I'll add some words explaining what is and how to make it work.
Thanks
Sean
By the way, shouldn't the two eBPF helpers bpf_rc_keydown() and bpf_rc_repeat() be compiled out in patch 1 if e.g. CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT is not set? There are some other helpers that are compiled only if relevant config options are set (bpf_get_xfrm_state() for example).
(If you were to change that, please also update helper documentations to indicate what configuration options are required to be able to use the helpers.)
Best regards,
Quentin
Sean Young
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
Quoted 35 lines · Quentin Monnet
2018-05-17 22:01 UTC+0100 ~ Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 18 lines · Y Song
Quoted 17 lines · Sean Young
Quoted 16 lines
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 +++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c[...]
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Most people probably not really familiar with lircN device. It would be good to provide more information about how to enable this, e.g.,
CONFIG_RC_CORE=y
CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT=y
CONFIG_RC_LOOPBACK=y
......Good point. I'll add some words explaining what is and how to make it work.
Thanks
Sean
Quoted 5 lines
By the way, shouldn't the two eBPF helpers
bpf_rc_keydown()andbpf_rc_repeat()be compiled out in patch 1 if e.g.CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENTis not set? There are some other helpers that are compiled only if relevant config options are set (bpf_get_xfrm_state()for example).
So if CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT is not set, then bpf-rawir-event.c is not compiled. Stubs are created in include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h, so this is already the case if I understand your correctly.
Quoted 3 lines
(If you were to change that, please also update helper documentations to indicate what configuration options are required to be able to use the helpers.)
Ok, I'll add that.
Thanks again!
Sean
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: add selftest for rawir_event type program
2018-05-18 14:33 UTC+0100 ~ Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 42 lines · Quentin Monnet
Quoted 35 lines
2018-05-17 22:01 UTC+0100 ~ Sean Young <[email protected]>
Quoted 18 lines · Y Song
Quoted 17 lines · Sean Young
Quoted 16 lines
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Signed-off-by Sean Young <[email protected]>--- tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 57 +++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh | 37 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c | 26 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_kern.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_rawir_event_user.c[...]
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Most people probably not really familiar with lircN device. It would be good to provide more information about how to enable this, e.g.,
CONFIG_RC_CORE=y
CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT=y
CONFIG_RC_LOOPBACK=y
......Good point. I'll add some words explaining what is and how to make it work.
Thanks
SeanQuoted 5 lines
By the way, shouldn't the two eBPF helpers
bpf_rc_keydown()andbpf_rc_repeat()be compiled out in patch 1 if e.g.CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENTis not set? There are some other helpers that are compiled only if relevant config options are set (bpf_get_xfrm_state()for example).
Quoted 3 lines
So if
CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENTis not set, thenbpf-rawir-event.cis not compiled. Stubs are created ininclude/linux/bpf_rcdev.h, so this is already the case if I understand your correctly.
This is correct, sorry for the mistake.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
(If you were to change that, please also update helper documentations to indicate what configuration options are required to be able to use the helpers.)
Ok, I'll add that.
Thanks a lot!
Quentin