OPP: Fix more bugs and improve error handling
Viresh Kumar
maintainercover OPP: Fix more bugs and improve error handling
Hello,
Few more bugs have surfaced recently, few of which have been there forever but came to light only after the recent changes in OPP core.
Dave already sent fix for one of them sometime back and as he isn't around for a week, I picked up the patch, modified it and posting V2 of it here.
Niklas already helped testing two of these on Qcom hardware where he originally faced the issues.
--
Viresh
Dave Gerlach (1):
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added
Viresh Kumar (3):
OPP: Improve error handling in dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table()
OPP: Return error on error from dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count()
cpufreq: dt: Try freeing static OPPs only if we have added them
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 34 +++++++++++++----------- drivers/opp/core.c | 2 +- drivers/opp/of.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a2c
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH 1/4 OPP: Improve error handling in dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table()
The error handling wasn't appropriate in dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(). For example it returns 0 on success and also for the case where cpumask is empty or cpu_device wasn't found for any of the CPUs.
It should really return error on such cases, so that the callers can be aware of the outcome.
Fix it.
--- drivers/opp/of.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/opp/of.c +12 -6
@@ -614,16 +614,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table);int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table (const struct cpumask *cpumask) {struct device *cpu_dev; -int cpu, ret =0 ; +int cpu, ret; -WARN_ON (cpumask_empty (cpumask)); +if (WARN_ON (cpumask_empty (cpumask))) +return -ENODEV ;for_each_cpu (cpu, cpumask) { cpu_dev =get_cpu_device (cpu);if (!cpu_dev) {pr_err ("%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n" , __func__, cpu); -continue ; + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto remove_table; } ret =dev_pm_opp_of_add_table (cpu_dev);
@@ -635,12 +637,16 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)pr_debug ("%s: couldn't find opp table for cpu:%d, %d\n" , __func__, cpu, ret); -/* Free all other OPPs */ -_dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table (cpumask, cpu); -break ; + goto remove_table; } } +return 0 ; + +remove_table: +/* Free all other OPPs */ +_dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table (cpumask, cpu); +return ret; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table);
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a2c
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH 2/4 OPP: Return error on error from dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count()
In reply to Viresh KumarReturn error number instead of 0 on failures.
--- drivers/opp/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/opp/core.c +1 -1
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev) count =PTR_ERR (opp_table);dev_dbg (dev,"%s: OPP table not found (%d)\n" , __func__, count); -return 0 ; +return count; } count =_get_opp_count (opp_table);
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a2c
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH 3/4 cpufreq: dt: Try freeing static OPPs only if we have added them
In reply to Viresh KumarWe can not call dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() freely anymore since the latest OPP core updates as that uses reference counting to free resources. There are cases where no static OPPs are added (using DT) for a platform and trying to remove the OPP table may end up decrementing refcount which is already zero and hence generating warnings.
Lets track if we were able to add static OPPs or not and then only remove the table based on that. Some reshuffling of code is also done to do that.
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c +19 -15
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct private_data {struct device *cpu_dev;struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;const char *reg_name; +bool have_static_opps; };static struct freq_attr *cpufreq_dt_attr[] = {
@@ -204,6 +205,15 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } } + priv =kzalloc (sizeof (*priv),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!priv) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out_put_regulator; + } + + priv->reg_name = name; + priv->opp_table = opp_table; +/* * Initialize OPP tables for all policy->cpus. They will be shared by * all CPUs which have marked their CPUs shared with OPP bindings.
@@ -214,7 +224,8 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)* * OPPs might be populated at runtime, don't check for error here */ -dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table (policy->cpus); +if (!dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table (policy->cpus)) + priv->have_static_opps = true;/* * But we need OPP table to function so if it is not there let's
@@ -240,19 +251,10 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) __func__, ret); } - priv =kzalloc (sizeof (*priv),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!priv) { - ret = -ENOMEM ; - goto out_free_opp; - } - - priv->reg_name = name; - priv->opp_table = opp_table; - ret =dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table (cpu_dev, &freq_table);if (ret) {dev_err (cpu_dev,"failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n" , ret); - goto out_free_priv; + goto out_free_opp; } priv->cpu_dev = cpu_dev;
@@ -282,10 +284,11 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) out_free_cpufreq_table:dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table (cpu_dev, &freq_table); -out_free_priv: -kfree (priv); out_free_opp: -dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table (policy->cpus); +if (priv->have_static_opps) +dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table (policy->cpus); +kfree (priv); +out_put_regulator:if (name)dev_pm_opp_put_regulators (opp_table); out_put_clk:
@@ -300,7 +303,8 @@ static int cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)cpufreq_cooling_unregister (priv->cdev);dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table (priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table); -dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table (policy->related_cpus); +if (priv->have_static_opps) +dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table (policy->related_cpus);if (priv->reg_name)dev_pm_opp_put_regulators (priv->opp_table);
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a2c
Viresh Kumar
maintainerPATCH v2 4/4 PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added
In reply to Viresh KumarFrom: Dave Gerlach <[email protected]>
Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list.
This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware.
Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added.
As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table.
Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail.
We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors.
Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs:
commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings")
But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count".
---
V2:
- Dave already sent V1 for this sometime back and I am sending the updated patch now as he isn't around and other folks are facing these issues as well.
- Update _opp_add_static_v2() to return the OPP pointer which can now be used to distinguish all the cases properly.
drivers/opp/of.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
drivers/opp/of.c +20 -13
@@ -297,15 +297,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table);* removed by dev_pm_opp_remove. * * Return: -* 0 On success OR +* Valid OPP pointer: +* On success +* NULL: * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and opp->available -* -EEXIST Freq are same and volt are different OR +* OR if the OPP is not supported by hardware. +* ERR_PTR(-EEXIST): +* Freq are same and volt are different OR * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and !opp->available -* -ENOMEM Memory allocation failure -* -EINVAL Failed parsing the OPP node +* ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM): +* Memory allocation failure +* ERR_PTR(-EINVAL): +* Failed parsing the OPP node */ -static int _opp_add_static_v2 (struct opp_table *opp_table,struct device *dev, -struct device_node *np) +static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2 (struct opp_table *opp_table, +struct device *dev,struct device_node *np) {struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;u64 rate =0 ;
@@ -315,7 +321,7 @@ static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct device *dev, new_opp =_opp_allocate (opp_table);if (!new_opp) -return -ENOMEM ; +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); ret =of_property_read_u64 (np,"opp-hz" , &rate);if (ret <0 ) {
@@ -390,12 +396,12 @@ static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct device *dev,* frequency/voltage list. */ blocking_notifier_call_chain (&opp_table->head,OPP_EVENT_ADD , new_opp); -return 0 ; +return new_opp; free_opp:_opp_free (new_opp); -return ret; +return ERR_PTR (ret); }/* Initializes OPP tables based on new bindings */
@@ -415,14 +421,15 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v2(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table)/* We have opp-table node now, iterate over it and add OPPs */ for_each_available_child_of_node (opp_table->np, np) { - count++; - - ret =_opp_add_static_v2 (opp_table, dev, np); -if (ret) { + opp =_opp_add_static_v2 (opp_table, dev, np); +if (IS_ERR (opp)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (opp);dev_err (dev,"%s: Failed to add OPP, %d\n" , __func__, ret);of_node_put (np); goto put_list_kref; + }else if (opp) { + count++; } }
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a2c