mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support
Subsystems (25)
v2 cover mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support
- Finalize XDP multi-buffer support for mvneta driver introducing the capability to map non-linear buffers on tx side.
- Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify if shared_info area has been properly initialized.
- Initialize multi-buffer bit (mb) to 0 in all XDP-capable drivers.
- Add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} utility routines.
- Introduce bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages. A possible use case for bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header is described here [0]
- Introduce bpf_xdp_get_frag_count and bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size helpers to report the total number/size of frags for a given xdp multi-buff.
XDP multi-buffer design principles are described here [1]
For the moment we have not implemented any self-test for the introduced the bpf helpers. We can address this in a follow up series if the proposed approach is accepted.
Changes since v1:
- Fix use-after-free in xdp_return_{buff/frame}
- Introduce bpf helpers
- Introduce xdp_mb sample program
- access skb_shared_info->nr_frags only on the last fragment
Changes since RFC:
- squash multi-buffer bit initialization in a single patch
- add mvneta non-linear XDP buff support for tx side
[0] https://netdevconf.info/0x14/session.html?talk-the-path-to-tcp-4k-mtu-and-rx-zerocopy
[1] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
Lorenzo Bianconi (7):
xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
xdp: initialize xdp_buff mb bit to 0 in all XDP drivers
net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP
Sameeh Jubran (2):
bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support samples/bpf: add bpf program that uses xdp mb helpers
drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 126 ++++++------ .../net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 1 + .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c | 1 + drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_bpf.c | 1 + drivers/net/tun.c | 2 + drivers/net/veth.c | 1 + drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 + drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 1 + include/net/xdp.h | 26 ++- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 +++- net/core/dev.c | 1 + net/core/filter.c | 93 +++++++++ net/core/xdp.c | 40 ++++ samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 + samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c | 68 +++++++ samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 40 +++- 32 files changed, 572 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
PATCH v2 1/9 xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify if shared_info area has been properly initialized for non-linear xdp buffers
--- include/net/xdp.h | 8 ++++++-- net/core/xdp.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/net/xdp.h +6 -2
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ struct xdp_buff {void *data_hard_start;struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;struct xdp_txq_info *txq; -u32 frame_sz;/* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 frame_sz:31; /* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear buffer */ };/* Reserve memory area at end-of data area.
@@ -96,7 +97,8 @@ struct xdp_frame {u16 len;u16 headroom; u32 metasize:8; - u32 frame_sz:24; + u32 frame_sz:23; + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear frame *//* Lifetime of xdp_rxq_info is limited to NAPI/enqueue time, * while mem info is valid on remote CPU. */
@@ -141,6 +143,7 @@ void xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(struct xdp_frame *frame, struct xdp_buff *xdp) xdp->data_end = frame->data + frame->len; xdp->data_meta = frame->data - frame->metasize; xdp->frame_sz = frame->frame_sz; + xdp->mb = frame->mb; } static inline
@@ -167,6 +170,7 @@ int xdp_update_frame_from_buff(struct xdp_buff *xdp, xdp_frame->headroom = headroom -sizeof (*xdp_frame); xdp_frame->metasize = metasize; xdp_frame->frame_sz = xdp->frame_sz; + xdp_frame->mb = xdp->mb;return 0 ; }
net/core/xdp.c +1 -0
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ struct xdp_frame *xdp_convert_zc_to_xdp_frame(struct xdp_buff *xdp) xdpf->headroom =0 ; xdpf->metasize = metasize; xdpf->frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdpf->mb = xdp->mb; xdpf->mem.type =MEM_TYPE_PAGE_ORDER0 ;xsk_buff_free (xdp);
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 25 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify if
shared_infoarea has been properly initialized for non-linear xdp buffersSigned-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/net/xdp.h | 8 ++++++-- net/core/xdp.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)include/net/xdp.h +2
-1@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ struct xdp_buff {void *data_hard_start;struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;struct xdp_txq_info *txq; -u32 frame_sz;/* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 frame_sz:31; /* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear buffer */ };/* Reserve memory area at end-of data area.
include/net/xdp.h struct xdp_frame { · line 101
Quoted 6 lines
include/net/xdp.h +2
-1@@ -96,7 +97,8 @@ struct xdp_frame {u16 len;u16 headroom; u32 metasize:8; - u32 frame_sz:24; + u32 frame_sz:23; + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear frame */
Hmm. Last time I checked compilers were generating ugly code with bitfields. Not performant and not efficient.frame_sz is used in the fast path.
I suspect the first hunk alone will cause performance degradation. Could you use normal u8 or u32 flag field?
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 24 lines · On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:07:05 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov…
Quoted 23 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify if
shared_infoarea has been properly initialized for non-linear xdp buffersSigned-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/net/xdp.h | 8 ++++++-- net/core/xdp.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)include/net/xdp.h +2
-1@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ struct xdp_buff {void *data_hard_start;struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;struct xdp_txq_info *txq; -u32 frame_sz;/* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 frame_sz:31; /* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear buffer */ };
Quoted 14 lines
include/net/xdp.h struct xdp_frame { · line 101
Quoted 8 lines
include/net/xdp.h +2
-1/* Reserve memory area at end-of data area. @@ -96,7 +97,8 @@ struct xdp_frame {u16 len;u16 headroom; u32 metasize:8; - u32 frame_sz:24; + u32 frame_sz:23; + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear frame */Hmm. Last time I checked compilers were generating ugly code with bitfields. Not performant and not efficient.
frame_szis used in the fast path.
I suspect the first hunk alone will cause performance degradation. Could you use normal u8 or u32 flag field?
For struct xdp_buff sure we can do this. For struct xdp_frame, I'm not sure, as it is a state compressed version of xdp_buff + extra information. The xdp_frame have been called skb-light, and I know people (e.g Ahern) wants to add more info to this, vlan, RX-hash, csum, and we must keep this to 1-cache-line, for performance reasons.
You do make a good point, that these bit-fields might hurt performance more. I guess, we need to test this. As I constantly worry that we will slowly kill XDP performance with a 1000 paper-cuts.
Signature · 4 lines
Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 48 lines · Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Quoted 24 lines · On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:07:05 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov…
Quoted 23 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify if
shared_infoarea has been properly initialized for non-linear xdp buffersSigned-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/net/xdp.h | 8 ++++++-- net/core/xdp.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)include/net/xdp.h +2
-1@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ struct xdp_buff {void *data_hard_start;struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;struct xdp_txq_info *txq; -u32 frame_sz;/* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 frame_sz:31; /* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear buffer */ };Quoted 14 lines
include/net/xdp.h struct xdp_frame { · line 101
Quoted 8 lines
include/net/xdp.h +2
-1/* Reserve memory area at end-of data area. @@ -96,7 +97,8 @@ struct xdp_frame {u16 len;u16 headroom; u32 metasize:8; - u32 frame_sz:24; + u32 frame_sz:23; + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear frame */Hmm. Last time I checked compilers were generating ugly code with bitfields. Not performant and not efficient.
frame_szis used in the fast path.
I suspect the first hunk alone will cause performance degradation. Could you use normal u8 or u32 flag field?For struct
xdp_buffsure we can do this. For structxdp_frame, I'm not sure, as it is a state compressed version ofxdp_buff+ extra information. Thexdp_framehave been called skb-light, and I know people (e.g Ahern) wants to add more info to this, vlan, RX-hash, csum, and we must keep this to 1-cache-line, for performance reasons.
Quoted 4 lines
You do make a good point, that these bit-fields might hurt performance more. I guess, we need to test this. As I constantly worry that we will slowly kill XDP performance with a 1000 paper-cuts.
That struct is tight on space, and we have to be very smart about additions. dev_rx for example seems like it could just be the netdev index rather than a pointer or perhaps can be removed completely. I believe it is only used for 1 use case (redirects to CPUMAP); maybe that code can be refactored to handle the dev outside of xdp_frame.
xdp_mem_info is 2 u32's; the type in that struct really could be a u8. In this case it means removing struct in favor of 2 elements to reclaim the space, but as we reach the 64B limit this is a place to change. e.g., make it a single u32 with the id only 24 bits though the rhashtable key can stay u32 but now with the combined type + id.
As for frame_sz, why does it need to be larger than a u16?
If it really needs to be larger than u16, there are several examples of using a bit (or bits) in the data path. dst metrics for examples uses lowest 4 bits of the dst pointer as a bitfield. It does so using a mask with accessors vs a bitfield. Perhaps that is the way to go here.
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 49 lines · On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:15:04 -0600 David Ahern <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 48 lines · Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Quoted 24 lines · On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:07:05 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov…
Quoted 23 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify if
shared_infoarea has been properly initialized for non-linear xdp buffersSigned-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/net/xdp.h | 8 ++++++-- net/core/xdp.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)include/net/xdp.h +2
-1@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ struct xdp_buff {void *data_hard_start;struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;struct xdp_txq_info *txq; -u32 frame_sz;/* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 frame_sz:31; /* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/ + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear buffer */ };Quoted 14 lines
include/net/xdp.h struct xdp_frame { · line 101
Quoted 8 lines
include/net/xdp.h +2
-1/* Reserve memory area at end-of data area. @@ -96,7 +97,8 @@ struct xdp_frame {u16 len;u16 headroom; u32 metasize:8; - u32 frame_sz:24; + u32 frame_sz:23; + u32 mb:1; /* xdp non-linear frame */Hmm. Last time I checked compilers were generating ugly code with bitfields. Not performant and not efficient.
frame_szis used in the fast path.
I suspect the first hunk alone will cause performance degradation. Could you use normal u8 or u32 flag field?For struct
xdp_buffsure we can do this. For structxdp_frame, I'm not sure, as it is a state compressed version ofxdp_buff+ extra information. Thexdp_framehave been called skb-light, and I know people (e.g Ahern) wants to add more info to this, vlan, RX-hash, csum, and we must keep this to 1-cache-line, for performance reasons.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
You do make a good point, that these bit-fields might hurt performance more. I guess, we need to test this. As I constantly worry that we will slowly kill XDP performance with a 1000 paper-cuts.
That struct is tight on space, and we have to be very smart about additions.
I fully agree.
Quoted 4 lines
dev_rxfor example seems like it could just be the netdev index rather than a pointer or perhaps can be removed completely. I believe it is only used for 1 use case (redirects to CPUMAP); maybe that code can be refactored to handle the dev outside ofxdp_frame.
The dev_rx is needed when creating an SKB from a xdp_frame (basically skb->dev = rx_dev). Yes, that is done in cpumap, but I want to generalize this. The veth also creates SKBs from xdp_frame, but use itself as skb->dev.
And yes, we could save some space storing the index instead, and trade space for cycles in a lookup.
Quoted 1 line
xdp_mem_infois 2 u32's; the type in that struct really could be a u8.
Yes, I have floated a patch that did this earlier, but it was never merged, as it was part of storing the xdp_mem_info in the SKB to create a return path for page_pool pages.
Quoted 6 lines
In this case it means removing struct in favor of 2 elements to reclaim the space, but as we reach the 64B limit this is a place to change. e.g., make it a single u32 with the id only 24 bits though the rhashtable key can stay u32 but now with the combined type + id.
As for
frame_sz, why does it need to be larger than a u16?
Because PAGE_SIZE can be 64KiB on some archs.
Quoted 4 lines
If it really needs to be larger than u16, there are several examples of using a bit (or bits) in the data path. dst metrics for examples uses lowest 4 bits of the dst pointer as a bitfield. It does so using a mask with accessors vs a bitfield. Perhaps that is the way to go here.
Signature · 7 lines
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
perl -e 'my $a=65536; printf("%d b%b 0x%X\n", $a, $a, $a)'
65536 b10000000000000000 0x10000Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 5 lines · Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Quoted 4 lines
dev_rxfor example seems like it could just be the netdev index rather than a pointer or perhaps can be removed completely. I believe it is only used for 1 use case (redirects to CPUMAP); maybe that code can be refactored to handle the dev outside ofxdp_frame.
Quoted 7 lines
The
dev_rxis needed when creating an SKB from axdp_frame(basicallyskb->dev=rx_dev). Yes, that is done in cpumap, but I want to generalize this. The veth also creates SKBs fromxdp_frame, but use itself asskb->dev.And yes, we could save some space storing the index instead, and trade space for cycles in a lookup.
I think this can be managed without adding a reference to the xdp_frame. I'll start a separate thread on that.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
As for
frame_sz, why does it need to be larger than a u16?Because
PAGE_SIZEcan be 64KiB on some archs.
ok, is there any alignment requirement? can frame_sz be number of 32-bit words? I believe bit shifts are cheap.
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 11 lines · On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:30:48 -0600 David Ahern <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 10 lines · Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Quoted 4 lines
dev_rxfor example seems like it could just be the netdev index rather than a pointer or perhaps can be removed completely. I believe it is only used for 1 use case (redirects to CPUMAP); maybe that code can be refactored to handle the dev outside ofxdp_frame.The
dev_rxis needed when creating an SKB from axdp_frame(basicallyskb->dev=rx_dev). Yes, that is done in cpumap, but I want to generalize this. The veth also creates SKBs fromxdp_frame, but use itself asskb->dev.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 2 lines
And yes, we could save some space storing the index instead, and trade space for cycles in a lookup.
I think this can be managed without adding a reference to the
xdp_frame. I'll start a separate thread on that.Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
As for
frame_sz, why does it need to be larger than a u16?Because
PAGE_SIZEcan be 64KiB on some archs.
I also believe syzbot managed to create packets for generic-XDP with frame_sz 128KiB, which was a bit weird (it's on my todo list to investigate and fix).
Quoted 2 lines
ok, is there any alignment requirement? can
frame_szbe number of 32-bit words? I believe bit shifts are cheap.
No that is not possible, because some drivers and generic-XDP have a fully dynamic frame_sz.
Signature · 4 lines
Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
Quoted 7 lines · Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Quoted 3 lines
ok, is there any alignment requirement? can
frame_szbe number of 32-bit words? I believe bit shifts are cheap.No that is not possible, because some drivers and generic-XDP have a fully dynamic
frame_sz.
frame_sz represents allocated memory right? What is the real range that needs to be supported for frame_sz? Surely there is some upper limit, and I thought it was 64kB.
Allocated memory will not be on an odd number, so fair to assume at a minimum it is a multiple of 2. correct? At a minimum we should be able to shift frame_sz by 1 which now covers 64kB in a u16.
PATCH v2 2/9 xdp: initialize xdp_buff mb bit to 0 in all XDP drivers
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiInitialize multi-buffer bit (mb) to 0 in all XDP-capable drivers. This is a preliminary patch to enable xdp multi-buffer support.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c | 1 + drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_bpf.c | 1 + drivers/net/tun.c | 2 ++ drivers/net/veth.c | 1 + drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 ++ drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 1 + net/core/dev.c | 1 + 23 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c +1 -0
@@ -1607,6 +1607,7 @@ static int ena_clean_rx_irq(struct ena_ring *rx_ring, struct napi_struct *napi, res_budget = budget; xdp.rxq = &rx_ring->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz =ENA_PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp.mb =0 ; do { xdp_verdict = XDP_PASS;
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c +1 -0
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ bool bnxt_rx_xdp(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr, u16 cons, xdp.data_end = *data_ptr + *len; xdp.rxq = &rxr->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ;/* BNXT_RX_PAGE_MODE(bp) when XDP enabled */ + xdp.mb =0 ; orig_data = xdp.data;rcu_read_lock ();
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c +1 -0
@@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ static inline bool nicvf_xdp_rx(struct nicvf *nic, struct bpf_prog *prog, xdp.data_end = xdp.data + len; xdp.rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz =RCV_FRAG_LEN +XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM ; + xdp.mb =0 ; orig_data = xdp.data;rcu_read_lock ();
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c +1 -0
@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ static u32 dpaa2_eth_run_xdp(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv, xdp.frame_sz =DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_RAW_SIZE - (dpaa2_fd_get_offset (fd) -XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM ); + xdp.mb =0 ; xdp_act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (xdp_prog, &xdp);
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c +1 -0
@@ -2320,6 +2320,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) xdp.frame_sz =i40e_rx_frame_truesize (rx_ring,0 );#endif xdp.rxq = &rx_ring->xdp_rxq; + xdp.mb =0 ;while (likely (total_rx_packets < (unsigned int )budget)) {struct i40e_rx_buffer *rx_buffer;
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c +1 -0
@@ -1089,6 +1089,7 @@ int ice_clean_rx_irq(struct ice_ring *rx_ring, int budget)#if (PAGE_SIZE <8192 ) xdp.frame_sz =ice_rx_frame_truesize (rx_ring,0 );#endif + xdp.mb =0 ;/* start the loop to process Rx packets bounded by 'budget' */ while (likely (total_rx_pkts < (unsigned int )budget)) {
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c +1 -0
@@ -2298,6 +2298,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,#if (PAGE_SIZE <8192 ) xdp.frame_sz =ixgbe_rx_frame_truesize (rx_ring,0 );#endif + xdp.mb =0 ;while (likely (total_rx_packets < budget)) {union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc;
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c +1 -0
@@ -1128,6 +1128,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,struct xdp_buff xdp; xdp.rxq = &rx_ring->xdp_rxq; + xdp.mb =0 ;/* Frame size depend on rx_ring setup when PAGE_SIZE=4K */ #if (PAGE_SIZE <8192 )
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c +1 -0
@@ -3475,6 +3475,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi, xdp.data = data +MVPP2_MH_SIZE +MVPP2_SKB_HEADROOM ; xdp.data_end = xdp.data + rx_bytes; xdp.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp.mb =0 ;if (bm_pool->pkt_size ==MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE ) xdp.rxq = &rxq->xdp_rxq_short;
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c +1 -0
@@ -684,6 +684,7 @@ int mlx4_en_process_rx_cq(struct net_device *dev, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq, int bud xdp_prog =rcu_dereference (ring->xdp_prog); xdp.rxq = &ring->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz = priv->frag_info[0 ].frag_stride; + xdp.mb =0 ; doorbell_pending =0 ;/* We assume a 1:1 mapping between CQEs and Rx descriptors, so Rx
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c +1 -0
@@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ static void mlx5e_fill_xdp_buff(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, void *va, u16 headroom, xdp->data_end = xdp->data + len; xdp->rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq; xdp->frame_sz = rq->buff.frame0_sz; + xdp->mb =0 ; } static struct sk_buff *
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c +1 -0
@@ -1824,6 +1824,7 @@ static int nfp_net_rx(struct nfp_net_rx_ring *rx_ring, int budget) true_bufsz = xdp_prog ?PAGE_SIZE : dp->fl_bufsz; xdp.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE -NFP_NET_RX_BUF_HEADROOM ; xdp.rxq = &rx_ring->xdp_rxq; + xdp.mb =0 ; tx_ring = r_vec->xdp_ring;while (pkts_polled < budget) {
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c +1 -0
@@ -1096,6 +1096,7 @@ static bool qede_rx_xdp(struct qede_dev *edev, xdp.data_end = xdp.data + *len; xdp.rxq = &rxq->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz = rxq->rx_buf_seg_size;/* PAGE_SIZE when XDP enabled */ + xdp.mb =0 ;/* Queues always have a full reset currently, so for the time * being until there's atomic program replace just mark read
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c +1 -0
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static bool efx_do_xdp(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_channel *channel, xdp.data_end = xdp.data + rx_buf->len; xdp.rxq = &rx_queue->xdp_rxq_info; xdp.frame_sz = efx->rx_page_buf_step; + xdp.mb =0 ; xdp_act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (xdp_prog, &xdp);rcu_read_unlock ();
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c +1 -0
@@ -947,6 +947,7 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget) xdp.rxq = &dring->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp.mb =0 ;rcu_read_lock (); xdp_prog =READ_ONCE (priv->xdp_prog);
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +1 -0
@@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status) xdp.data_hard_start = pa; xdp.rxq = &priv->xdp_rxq[ch]; xdp.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp.mb =0 ; port = priv->emac_port + cpsw->data.dual_emac; ret =cpsw_run_xdp (priv, ch, &xdp, page, port);
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c +1 -0
@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status) xdp.data_hard_start = pa; xdp.rxq = &priv->xdp_rxq[ch]; xdp.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp.mb =0 ; ret =cpsw_run_xdp (priv, ch, &xdp, page, priv->emac_port);if (ret !=CPSW_XDP_PASS )
drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_bpf.c +1 -0
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ u32 netvsc_run_xdp(struct net_device *ndev, struct netvsc_channel *nvchan, xdp->data_end = xdp->data + len; xdp->rxq = &nvchan->xdp_rxq; xdp->frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp->mb =0 ;memcpy (xdp->data, data, len);
drivers/net/tun.c +2 -0
@@ -1641,6 +1641,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_build_skb(struct tun_struct *tun, xdp.data_end = xdp.data + len; xdp.rxq = &tfile->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz = buflen; + xdp.mb =0 ; act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (xdp_prog, &xdp);if (act ==XDP_REDIRECT || act ==XDP_TX ) {
@@ -2388,6 +2389,7 @@ static int tun_xdp_one(struct tun_struct *tun,xdp_set_data_meta_invalid (xdp); xdp->rxq = &tfile->xdp_rxq; xdp->frame_sz = buflen; + xdp->mb =0 ; act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (xdp_prog, xdp); err =tun_xdp_act (tun, xdp_prog, xdp, act);
drivers/net/veth.c +1 -0
@@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *veth_xdp_rcv_skb(struct veth_rq *rq,/* SKB "head" area always have tailroom for skb_shared_info */ xdp.frame_sz = (void *)skb_end_pointer (skb) - xdp.data_hard_start; xdp.frame_sz +=SKB_DATA_ALIGN (sizeof (struct skb_shared_info )); + xdp.mb =0 ; orig_data = xdp.data; orig_data_end = xdp.data_end;
drivers/net/virtio_net.c +2 -0
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev, xdp.data_meta = xdp.data; xdp.rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz = buflen; + xdp.mb =0 ; orig_data = xdp.data; act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (xdp_prog, &xdp); stats->xdp_packets++;
@@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev, xdp.data_meta = xdp.data; xdp.rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq; xdp.frame_sz = frame_sz - vi->hdr_len; + xdp.mb =0 ; act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (xdp_prog, &xdp); stats->xdp_packets++;
drivers/net/xen-netfront.c +1 -0
@@ -870,6 +870,7 @@ static u32 xennet_run_xdp(struct netfront_queue *queue, struct page *pdata, xdp->data_end = xdp->data + len; xdp->rxq = &queue->xdp_rxq; xdp->frame_sz =XEN_PAGE_SIZE -XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM ; + xdp->mb =0 ; act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (prog, xdp);switch (act) {
net/core/dev.c +1 -0
@@ -4639,6 +4639,7 @@ static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb,/* SKB "head" area always have tailroom for skb_shared_info */ xdp->frame_sz = (void *)skb_end_pointer (skb) - xdp->data_hard_start; xdp->frame_sz +=SKB_DATA_ALIGN (sizeof (struct skb_shared_info )); + xdp->mb =0 ; orig_data_end = xdp->data_end; orig_data = xdp->data;
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] xdp: initialize xdp_buff mb bit to 0 in all XDP drivers
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, · line 2304
Quoted 12 lines · On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:58:46 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> wrote:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c +1
-0@@ -2298,6 +2298,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,#if (PAGE_SIZE <8192 ) xdp.frame_sz =ixgbe_rx_frame_truesize (rx_ring,0 );#endif + xdp.mb =0 ;while (likely (total_rx_packets < budget)) {union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc;
In this ixgbe driver you are smart and init the xdp.mb bit outside the
(like xdp.frame_sz, when frame_sz is constant). This is a nice
optimization, but the driver developer that adds XDP multi-buffer support must remember to reset it. The patch itself is okay, it is just something to keep in-mind when reviewing/changing drivers.
Signature · 4 lines
Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] xdp: initialize xdp_buff mb bit to 0 in all XDP drivers
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 10 lines · On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:58:46 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> wrote:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c +1
-0@@ -2298,6 +2298,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,#if (PAGE_SIZE <8192 ) xdp.frame_sz =ixgbe_rx_frame_truesize (rx_ring,0 );#endif + xdp.mb =0 ;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, · line 2304
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c +0
-0while (likely (total_rx_packets < budget)) {union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc;In this ixgbe driver you are smart and init the xdp.mb bit outside the
(like xdp.frame_sz, whenframe_szis constant). This is a nice
optimization, but the driver developer that adds XDP multi-buffer support must remember to reset it. The patch itself is okay, it is just something to keep in-mind when reviewing/changing drivers.
yes, I have just decided to avoid unnecessary instructions for the moment.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 7 lines
Signature · 5 lines
-- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20200904/63778957/attachment-0001.asc>
PATCH v2 3/9 net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiUpdate multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_buff to notify XDP/eBPF layer and XDP remote drivers if this is a "non-linear" XDP buffer. Access skb_shared_info only if xdp_buff mb is set
--- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 37 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +21 -16
@@ -2027,11 +2027,11 @@ mvneta_xdp_put_buff(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, struct xdp_buff *xdp, int sync_len, bool napi) { struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp); -int i; +int i, num_frames = xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ;page_pool_put_page (rxq->page_pool,virt_to_head_page (xdp->data), sync_len, napi); -for (i =0 ; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++) +for (i =0 ; i < num_frames; i++)page_pool_put_full_page (rxq->page_pool,skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[i]), napi); }
@@ -2175,6 +2175,7 @@ mvneta_run_xdp(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start - pp->rx_offset_correction; data_len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data; + act =bpf_prog_run_xdp (prog, xdp);/* Due xdp_adjust_tail: DMA sync for_device cover max len CPU touch */
@@ -2234,7 +2235,6 @@ mvneta_swbm_rx_frame(struct mvneta_port *pp,int data_len = -MVNETA_MH_SIZE , len;struct net_device *dev = pp->dev;enum dma_data_direction dma_dir; -struct skb_shared_info *sinfo;if (MVNETA_SKB_SIZE (rx_desc->data_size) >PAGE_SIZE ) { len =MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE ;
@@ -2256,9 +2256,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_rx_frame(struct mvneta_port *pp, xdp->data = data + pp->rx_offset_correction +MVNETA_MH_SIZE ; xdp->data_end = xdp->data + data_len;xdp_set_data_meta_invalid (xdp); - - sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); - sinfo->nr_frags =0 ; + xdp->mb =0 ; *size = rx_desc->data_size - len; rx_desc->buf_phys_addr =0 ;
@@ -2269,7 +2267,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp,struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, struct xdp_buff *xdp, int *size, - struct page *page) + int *nfrags, struct page *page) { struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);struct net_device *dev = pp->dev;
@@ -2288,13 +2286,18 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp, rx_desc->buf_phys_addr, len, dma_dir); -if (data_len >0 && sinfo->nr_frags <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { -skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags]; +if (data_len >0 && *nfrags <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { +skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[*nfrags];skb_frag_off_set (frag, pp->rx_offset_correction);skb_frag_size_set (frag, data_len);__skb_frag_set_page (frag, page); - sinfo->nr_frags++; + *nfrags = *nfrags +1 ; + +if (rx_desc->status &MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC ) { + sinfo->nr_frags = *nfrags; + xdp->mb = true; + } rx_desc->buf_phys_addr =0 ; }
@@ -2306,7 +2309,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 desc_status) {struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); -int i, num_frags = sinfo->nr_frags; +int i, num_frags = xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ;skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS ];struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -2341,13 +2344,14 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct napi_struct *napi, {int rx_proc =0 , rx_todo, refill, size =0 ;struct net_device *dev = pp->dev; -struct xdp_buff xdp_buf = { - .frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE , - .rxq = &rxq->xdp_rxq, - };struct mvneta_stats ps = {};struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;u32 desc_status, frame_sz; +struct xdp_buff xdp_buf; +int nfrags; + + xdp_buf.frame_sz =PAGE_SIZE ; + xdp_buf.rxq = &rxq->xdp_rxq;/* Get number of received packets */ rx_todo =mvneta_rxq_busy_desc_num_get (pp, rxq);
@@ -2379,6 +2383,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct napi_struct *napi, size = rx_desc->data_size; frame_sz = size -ETH_FCS_LEN ; desc_status = rx_desc->status; + nfrags =0 ;mvneta_swbm_rx_frame (pp, rx_desc, rxq, &xdp_buf, &size, page, &ps);
@@ -2387,7 +2392,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct napi_struct *napi,continue ;mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment (pp, rx_desc, rxq, &xdp_buf, - &size, page); + &size, &nfrags, page); }/* Middle or Last descriptor */ if (!(rx_status &MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC ))
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
Quoted 61 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Update multi-buffer bit (mb) in
xdp_buffto notify XDP/eBPF layer and XDP remote drivers if this is a "non-linear" XDP buffer. Accessskb_shared_infoonly ifxdp_buffmb is setSigned-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 37 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +2
-2@@ -2027,11 +2027,11 @@ mvneta_xdp_put_buff(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, struct xdp_buff *xdp, int sync_len, bool napi) {struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); -int i; +int i, num_frames = xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ;page_pool_put_page (rxq->page_pool,virt_to_head_page (xdp->data), sync_len, napi); -for (i =0 ; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++) +for (i =0 ; i < num_frames; i++)drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +2
-3page_pool_put_full_page (rxq->page_pool,skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[i]), napi); }@@ -2175,6 +2175,7 @@ mvneta_run_xdp(struct mvneta_port *pp,struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start - pp->rx_offset_correction; data_len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data; - sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); - sinfo->nr_frags =0 ; + xdp->mb =0 ; *size = rx_desc->data_size - len; rx_desc->buf_phys_addr =0 ;@@ -2269,7 +2267,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(structmvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, struct xdp_buff *xdp, int *size, - struct page *page) + int *nfrags, struct page *page) { struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =
xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +0
-0struct net_device *dev = pp->dev;@@ -2288,13 +2286,18 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp, rx_desc->buf_phys_addr, len, dma_dir);
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct · line 2296
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +3
-3-if (data_len >0 && sinfo->nr_frags <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { -skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags]; +if (data_len >0 && *nfrags <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { +skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[*nfrags];skb_frag_off_set (frag, pp->rx_offset_correction);skb_frag_size_set (frag, data_len);__skb_frag_set_page (frag, page); - sinfo->nr_frags++; + *nfrags = *nfrags +1 ;
nit, why do you use nfrags variable instead of sinfo->nr_frags (as it was before this patch) ?
You doesn't seem to use the nfrags variable in the
caller function and you update nr_frags as well.
If it's used in a different patch (haven't
reviewed it all yet), maybe move it to that patch
? (sorry in advance if I missed the logic here)
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +5
-0+ +if (rx_desc->status &MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC ) { + sinfo->nr_frags = *nfrags; + xdp->mb = true; + } rx_desc->buf_phys_addr =0 ;
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
[...]
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp, · line 2295
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +3
-3rx_desc->buf_phys_addr, len, dma_dir); -if (data_len >0 && sinfo->nr_frags <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { -skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags]; +if (data_len >0 && *nfrags <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { +skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[*nfrags];skb_frag_off_set (frag, pp->rx_offset_correction);skb_frag_size_set (frag, data_len);__skb_frag_set_page (frag, page); - sinfo->nr_frags++; + *nfrags = *nfrags +1 ;
Quoted 7 lines
nit, why do you use nfrags variable instead of
sinfo->nr_frags(as it was before this patch) ?
You doesn't seem to use the nfrags variable in the
caller function and you updatenr_fragsas well.
If it's used in a different patch (haven't
reviewed it all yet), maybe move it to that patch ? (sorry in
advance if I missed the logic here)
nfrags pointer is used to avoid the sinfo->nr_frags initialization in mvneta_swbm_rx_frame() since skb_shared_info is not in the cache usually. AFAIK the hw does not provide the info "this is the second descriptor" but just "this the frist/last descriptor".
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +5
-0+ +if (rx_desc->status &MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC ) { + sinfo->nr_frags = *nfrags; + xdp->mb = true; + } rx_desc->buf_phys_addr =0 ;
PATCH v2 4/9 xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiTake into account if the received xdp_buff/xdp_frame is non-linear recycling/returning the frame memory to the allocator
--- include/net/xdp.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- net/core/xdp.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/net/xdp.h +16 -2
@@ -208,10 +208,24 @@ void __xdp_release_frame(void *data, struct xdp_mem_info *mem);static inline void xdp_release_frame (struct xdp_frame *xdpf) {struct xdp_mem_info *mem = &xdpf->mem; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int i;/* Curr only page_pool needs this */ -if (mem->type ==MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL ) -__xdp_release_frame (xdpf->data, mem); +if (mem->type !=MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL ) +return ; + +if (likely (!xdpf->mb)) + goto out; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame (xdpf); +for (i =0 ; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++) { +struct page *page =skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[i]); + +__xdp_release_frame (page_address (page), mem); + } +out: +__xdp_release_frame (xdpf->data, mem); } int xdp_rxq_info_reg(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
net/core/xdp.c +39 -0
@@ -370,18 +370,57 @@ static void __xdp_return(void *data, struct xdp_mem_info *mem, bool napi_direct)void xdp_return_frame (struct xdp_frame *xdpf) { +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int i; + +if (likely (!xdpf->mb)) + goto out; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame (xdpf); +for (i =0 ; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++) { +struct page *page =skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[i]); + +__xdp_return (page_address (page), &xdpf->mem, false); + } +out:__xdp_return (xdpf->data, &xdpf->mem, false); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (xdp_return_frame);void xdp_return_frame_rx_napi (struct xdp_frame *xdpf) { +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int i; + +if (likely (!xdpf->mb)) + goto out; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame (xdpf); +for (i =0 ; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++) { +struct page *page =skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[i]); + +__xdp_return (page_address (page), &xdpf->mem, true); + } +out:__xdp_return (xdpf->data, &xdpf->mem, true); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (xdp_return_frame_rx_napi);void xdp_return_buff (struct xdp_buff *xdp) { +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int i; + +if (likely (!xdp->mb)) + goto out; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); +for (i =0 ; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++) { +struct page *page =skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[i]); + +__xdp_return (page_address (page), &xdp->rxq->mem, true); + } +out:__xdp_return (xdp->data, &xdp->rxq->mem, true); }
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
PATCH v2 5/9 net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiIntroduce the capability to map non-linear xdp buffer running mvneta_xdp_submit_frame() for XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT
--- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +49 -30
@@ -1854,8 +1854,8 @@ static void mvneta_txq_bufs_free(struct mvneta_port *pp, bytes_compl += buf->skb->len; pkts_compl++;dev_kfree_skb_any (buf->skb); - }else if (buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX || - buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ) { + }else if ((buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX || + buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ) && buf->xdpf) {xdp_return_frame (buf->xdpf); } }
@@ -2040,43 +2040,62 @@ static int mvneta_xdp_submit_frame(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq, struct xdp_frame *xdpf, bool dma_map) { - struct mvneta_tx_desc *tx_desc; -struct mvneta_tx_buf *buf; -dma_addr_t dma_addr; + struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(xdpf); +int i, num_frames = xdpf->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags +1 :1 ; +struct mvneta_tx_desc *tx_desc =NULL ; +struct page *page; -if (txq->count >= txq->tx_stop_threshold) +if (txq->count + num_frames >= txq->tx_stop_threshold)return MVNETA_XDP_DROPPED ; - tx_desc =mvneta_txq_next_desc_get (txq); +for (i =0 ; i < num_frames; i++) { +struct mvneta_tx_buf *buf = &txq->buf[txq->txq_put_index]; +skb_frag_t *frag = i ? &sinfo->frags[i -1 ] :NULL ; +int len = frag ?skb_frag_size (frag) : xdpf->len; +dma_addr_t dma_addr; - buf = &txq->buf[txq->txq_put_index]; -if (dma_map) { -/* ndo_xdp_xmit */ - dma_addr =dma_map_single (pp->dev->dev.parent, xdpf->data, - xdpf->len,DMA_TO_DEVICE ); -if (dma_mapping_error (pp->dev->dev.parent, dma_addr)) { -mvneta_txq_desc_put (txq); -return MVNETA_XDP_DROPPED ; + tx_desc =mvneta_txq_next_desc_get (txq); +if (dma_map) { +/* ndo_xdp_xmit */ +void *data; + + data = frag ?page_address (skb_frag_page (frag)) + : xdpf->data; + dma_addr =dma_map_single (pp->dev->dev.parent, data, + len,DMA_TO_DEVICE ); +if (dma_mapping_error (pp->dev->dev.parent, dma_addr)) { +for (; i >=0 ; i--) +mvneta_txq_desc_put (txq); +return MVNETA_XDP_DROPPED ; + } + buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ; + }else { + page = frag ?skb_frag_page (frag) + :virt_to_page (xdpf->data); + dma_addr =page_pool_get_dma_addr (page); +if (!frag) + dma_addr +=sizeof (*xdpf) + xdpf->headroom; +dma_sync_single_for_device (pp->dev->dev.parent, + dma_addr, len, +DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ); + buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX ; } - buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ; - }else { -struct page *page =virt_to_page (xdpf->data); + buf->xdpf = i ?NULL : xdpf; - dma_addr =page_pool_get_dma_addr (page) + -sizeof (*xdpf) + xdpf->headroom; -dma_sync_single_for_device (pp->dev->dev.parent, dma_addr, - xdpf->len,DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ); - buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX ; +if (!i) + tx_desc->command =MVNETA_TXD_F_DESC ; + tx_desc->buf_phys_addr = dma_addr; + tx_desc->data_size = len; + +mvneta_txq_inc_put (txq); } - buf->xdpf = xdpf; - tx_desc->command =MVNETA_TXD_FLZ_DESC ; - tx_desc->buf_phys_addr = dma_addr; - tx_desc->data_size = xdpf->len; +/*last descriptor */ +if (tx_desc) + tx_desc->command |=MVNETA_TXD_L_DESC |MVNETA_TXD_Z_PAD ; -mvneta_txq_inc_put (txq); - txq->pending++; - txq->count++; + txq->pending += num_frames; + txq->count += num_frames;return MVNETA_XDP_TX ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
Quoted 124 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce the capability to map non-linear xdp buffer running
mvneta_xdp_submit_frame()forXDP_TXandXDP_REDIRECTSigned-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +2
-2@@ -1854,8 +1854,8 @@ static void mvneta_txq_bufs_free(struct mvneta_port *pp, bytes_compl += buf->skb->len; pkts_compl++;dev_kfree_skb_any (buf->skb); - }else if (buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX || - buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ) { + }else if ((buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX || + buf->type ==MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ) && buf->xdpf) {xdp_return_frame (buf->xdpf);drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +36
-20} }@@ -2040,43 +2040,62 @@ static int mvneta_xdp_submit_frame(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq, struct xdp_frame *xdpf, bool dma_map) { - struct mvneta_tx_desc *tx_desc; -struct mvneta_tx_buf *buf; -dma_addr_t dma_addr; + struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame (xdpf); +int i, num_frames = xdpf->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags +1 :1 ; +struct mvneta_tx_desc *tx_desc =NULL ; +struct page *page; -if (txq->count >= txq->tx_stop_threshold) +if (txq->count + num_frames >= txq->tx_stop_threshold)return MVNETA_XDP_DROPPED ; - tx_desc =mvneta_txq_next_desc_get (txq); +for (i =0 ; i < num_frames; i++) { +struct mvneta_tx_buf *buf = &txq->buf[txq->txq_put_index]; +skb_frag_t *frag = i ? &sinfo->frags[i -1 ] :NULL ; +int len = frag ?skb_frag_size (frag) : xdpf->len; +dma_addr_t dma_addr; - buf = &txq->buf[txq->txq_put_index]; -if (dma_map) { -/* ndo_xdp_xmit */ - dma_addr =dma_map_single (pp->dev->dev.parent, xdpf->data, - xdpf->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE); -if (dma_mapping_error (pp->dev->dev.parent, dma_addr)) { -mvneta_txq_desc_put (txq); -return MVNETA_XDP_DROPPED ; + tx_desc =mvneta_txq_next_desc_get (txq); +if (dma_map) { +/* ndo_xdp_xmit */ +void *data; + + data = frag ?page_address (skb_frag_page (frag)) + : xdpf->data; + dma_addr =dma_map_single (pp->dev->dev.parent, data, + len,DMA_TO_DEVICE ); +if (dma_mapping_error (pp->dev->dev.parent, dma_addr)) { +for (; i >=0 ; i--) +mvneta_txq_desc_put (txq); +return MVNETA_XDP_DROPPED ; + } + buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ; + }else { + page = frag ?skb_frag_page (frag) + :virt_to_page (xdpf->data); + dma_addr =page_pool_get_dma_addr (page); +if (!frag) + dma_addr +=sizeof (*xdpf) + xdpf->headroom; +dma_sync_single_for_device (pp->dev->dev.parent, + dma_addr, len, +DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ); + buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX ; } - buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_NDO ; - }else { -struct page *page =virt_to_page (xdpf->data); + buf->xdpf = i ?NULL : xdpf; - dma_addr =page_pool_get_dma_addr (page) + -sizeof (*xdpf) + xdpf->headroom; - dma_sync_single_for_device(pp->dev->dev.parent, dma_addr, - xdpf->len,
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +9
-5- buf->type =MVNETA_TYPE_XDP_TX ; +if (!i) + tx_desc->command =MVNETA_TXD_F_DESC ; + tx_desc->buf_phys_addr = dma_addr; + tx_desc->data_size = len; + +mvneta_txq_inc_put (txq); } - buf->xdpf = xdpf; - tx_desc->command =MVNETA_TXD_FLZ_DESC ; - tx_desc->buf_phys_addr = dma_addr; - tx_desc->data_size = xdpf->len; +/*last descriptor */ +if (tx_desc) + tx_desc->command |= MVNETA_TXD_L_DESC |
Quoted 1 line
MVNETA_TXD_Z_PAD;
When is this condition not taken ? You initialize tx_desc
to NULL, but it seems to me like you always set it inside
the for loop to the output of mvneta_txq_next_desc_get()
which doesn't look like it returns NULL. The for loop runs 1 iteration or `sinfo->nr_frage
+ 1` iterations (which also equals or larger than 1).
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +2
-3-mvneta_txq_inc_put (txq); - txq->pending++; - txq->count++; + txq->pending += num_frames; + txq->count += num_frames;return MVNETA_XDP_TX ; }
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
Quoted 3 lines
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> writes:
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +1
-4- buf->xdpf = xdpf; - tx_desc->command =MVNETA_TXD_FLZ_DESC ; - tx_desc->buf_phys_addr = dma_addr; - tx_desc->data_size = xdpf->len; +/*last descriptor */
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c static int · line 2095
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +2
-0+if (tx_desc) + tx_desc->command |=MVNETA_TXD_L_DESC |MVNETA_TXD_Z_PAD ;When is this condition not taken ? You initialize
tx_descto
NULL, but it seems to me like you always set it inside the for loop
to the output ofmvneta_txq_next_desc_get()which doesn't look like
it returns NULL. The for loop runs 1 iteration orsinfo->nr_frage + 1iterations (which also equals or larger than 1).
ack, right. I will fix it in v3.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +2
-3-mvneta_txq_inc_put (txq); - txq->pending++; - txq->count++; + txq->pending += num_frames; + txq->count += num_frames;return MVNETA_XDP_TX ; }
PATCH v2 6/9 bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiIntroduce bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper in order to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one.
This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages.
--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 ++++++++++++---- net/core/filter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +20 -5
@@ -3571,11 +3571,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr) -* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return -* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store +* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset) +* Description +* Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second +* buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move +* headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in +* the first fragment. +* +* A call to this helper is susceptible to change the underlying +* packet buffer. Therefore, at load time, all checks on pointers +* previously done by the verifier are invalidated and must be +* performed again, if the helper is used in combination with +* direct packet access. +* +* Return +* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \
@@ -3727,6 +3741,7 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (inode_storage_delete), \FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \ +FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
net/core/filter.c +54 -0
72 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +21 -5
@@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ union bpf_attr {* A non-negative value equal to or less than *size* on success, * or a negative error in case of failure. * +* * long bpf_load_hdr_opt(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops, void *searchby_res, u32 len, u64 flags) * Description * Load header option. Support reading a particular TCP header
@@ -3571,11 +3572,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr) -* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return -* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store +* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset) +* Description +* Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second +* buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move +* headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in +* the first fragment. +* +* A call to this helper is susceptible to change the underlying +* packet buffer. Therefore, at load time, all checks on pointers +* previously done by the verifier are invalidated and must be +* performed again, if the helper is used in combination with +* direct packet access. +* +* Return +* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \
@@ -3727,6 +3742,7 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (inode_storage_delete), \FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \ +FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 22 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper in order to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one.
This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages.Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 ++++++++++++---- net/core/filter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +0
-0@@ -3571,11 +3571,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr)
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 3578
Quoted 10 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +5
-5-* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return -* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store +* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset)
botched rebase?
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 27 lines · Alexei Starovoitov
Quoted 26 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper in order to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one.
This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages.Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 ++++++++++++---- net/core/filter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +0
-4@@ -3571,11 +3571,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr) -* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return
Quoted 8 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 3578
Quoted 6 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +5
-1-* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store +* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset) botched rebase?
Yes, sorry. I will fix in v3.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiQuoted 32 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
net/core/filter.c +32
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ; + + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + +if (offset <0 && (-offset > frag_offset || + data_end < xdp->data +ETH_HLEN )) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset); + }else {
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); + xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}
wait a sec. Are you saying that multi buffer XDP actually should be skb based? If that's what mvneta driver is doing that's fine, but that is not a reasonable requirement to put on all other drivers.
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 39 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 38 lines
net/core/filter.c +38
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ; + + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + +if (offset <0 && (-offset > frag_offset || + data_end < xdp->data +ETH_HLEN )) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset); + }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset);
Quoted 8 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 4 lines
net/core/filter.c +4
-0+ xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}wait a sec. Are you saying that multi buffer XDP actually should be skb based? If that's what mvneta driver is doing that's fine, but that is not a reasonable requirement to put on all other drivers.
I did not got what you mean here. The xdp multi-buffer layout uses the skb_shared_info at the end of the first buffer to link subsequent frames [0] and we rely on skb_frag* utilities to set/read offset and length of subsequent buffers.
Regards,
Lorenzo
[0] http://people.redhat.com/lbiancon/conference/NetDevConf2020-0x14/add-xdp-on-driver.html - XDP multi-buffers section
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 48 lines · On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:50:31 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 39 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 38 lines
net/core/filter.c +38
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ; + + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + +if (offset <0 && (-offset > frag_offset || + data_end < xdp->data +ETH_HLEN )) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset); + }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset);Quoted 8 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 4 lines
net/core/filter.c +4
-0+ xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}wait a sec. Are you saying that multi buffer XDP actually should be skb based? If that's what mvneta driver is doing that's fine, but that is not a reasonable requirement to put on all other drivers.
Quoted 4 lines
I did not got what you mean here. The xdp multi-buffer layout uses the
skb_shared_infoat the end of the first buffer to link subsequent frames [0] and we rely on skb_frag* utilities to set/read offset and length of subsequent buffers.
Yes, for now the same layout as "skb_shared_info" is "reuse", but I think we should think of this as "xdp_shared_info" instead, as how it is used for XDP is going to divert from SKBs. We already discussed (in conf call) that we could store the total len of "frags" here, to simplify the other helper.
Using the skb_frag_* helper functions are misleading, and will make it more difficult to divert from how SKB handle frags. What about introducing xdp_frag_* wrappers? (what do others think?)
Quoted 3 lines
[0] http://people.redhat.com/lbiancon/conference/NetDevConf2020-0x14/add-xdp-on-driver.html
- XDP multi-buffers section (slide 40)
Signature · 4 lines
Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 56 lines
Quoted 48 lines · On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:50:31 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 39 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 38 lines
net/core/filter.c +38
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ; + + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + +if (offset <0 && (-offset > frag_offset || + data_end < xdp->data +ETH_HLEN )) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset); + }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset);Quoted 8 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 4 lines
net/core/filter.c +4
-0+ xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}wait a sec. Are you saying that multi buffer XDP actually should be skb based? If that's what mvneta driver is doing that's fine, but that is not a reasonable requirement to put on all other drivers.
Quoted 4 lines
I did not got what you mean here. The xdp multi-buffer layout uses the
skb_shared_infoat the end of the first buffer to link subsequent frames [0] and we rely on skb_frag* utilities to set/read offset and length of subsequent buffers.
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, for now the same layout as "
skb_shared_info" is "reuse", but I think we should think of this as "xdp_shared_info" instead, as how it is used for XDP is going to divert from SKBs. We already discussed (in conf call) that we could store the total len of "frags" here, to simplify the other helper.
I like this approach, at the end the first fragment we can have something like:
struct xdp_shared_info {
skb_frag_f frags[16];
int n_frags;
int frag_len;
};or do you prefer to not use skb_frag_t struct?
Quoted 4 lines
Using the skb_frag_* helper functions are misleading, and will make it more difficult to divert from how SKB handle frags. What about introducing xdp_frag_* wrappers? (what do others think?)
I am fine with having some dedicated helpers.
Anyway we need to construct the xdp_buff {} receiving the dma descriptors.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 5 lines
[0] http://people.redhat.com/lbiancon/conference/NetDevConf2020-0x14/add-xdp-on-driver.html
- XDP multi-buffers section (slide 40)Signature · 4 lines
Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
John Fastabend
maintainerRE: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiQuoted 27 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper in order to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one.
This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages.Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 ++++++++++++---- net/core/filter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +0
-5@@ -3571,11 +3571,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr) -* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return -* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 3583
Quoted 10 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +10
-0+* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store +* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset) +* Description +* Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second +* buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move +* headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in +* the first fragment.
This is confusing to read. Does this mean I can "move bytes to the second buffer from the first one" or "move bytes from the second buffer to the first one" And what are frame headers? I'm sure I can read below code and work it out, but users reading the header file should be able to parse this.
Also we want to be able to read all data not just headers. Reading the payload of a TCP packet is equally important for many l7 load balancers.
Quoted 34 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +10
-0+* +* A call to this helper is susceptible to change the underlying +* packet buffer. Therefore, at load time, all checks on pointers +* previously done by the verifier are invalidated and must be +* performed again, if the helper is used in combination with +* direct packet access. +* +* Return +* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -3727,6 +3741,7 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (inode_storage_delete), \FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \ +FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper net/core/filter.c +6
-0@@ -3475,6 +3475,57 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len;
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3493
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ;
What if we want data in frags[1] and so on.
Quoted 5 lines
net/core/filter.c +5
-0+ + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + + if (offset < 0 && (-offset > frag_offset ||
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3508
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+ data_end < xdp->data + ETH_HLEN)) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset);
But this could get expensive for large amount of data? And also limiting because we require the room to do the copy. Presumably the reason we have fargs[1] is because the normal page or half page is in use?
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 11 lines
net/core/filter.c +11
-0+ }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); + xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}
So overall I don't see the point of copying bytes from one frag to another. Create an API that adjusts the data pointers and then copies are avoided and manipulating frags is not needed.
Also and even more concerning I think this API requires the driver to populate shinfo. If we use TX_REDIRECT a lot or TX_XMIT this means we need to populate shinfo when its probably not ever used. If our driver is smart L2/L3 headers are in the readable data and prefetched. Writing frags into the end of a page is likely not free.
Did you benchmark this?
In general users of this API should know the bytes they want to fetch. Use an API like this,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, start, end)
Where xdp is the frame, start is the first byte the user wants and end is the last byte. Then usually you can skip the entire copy part and just move the xdp pointesr around. The ugly case is if the user puts start/end across a frag boundary and a copy is needed. In that case maybe we use end as a hint and not a hard requirement.
The use case I see is I read L2/L3/L4 headers and I need the first N bytes of the payload. I know where the payload starts and I know how many bytes I need so,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, payload_offset, bytes_needed);
Then hopefully that is all in one frag. If its not I'll need to do a second helper call. Still nicer than forcing drivers to populate this shinfo I think. If you think I'm wrong try a benchmark. Benchmarks aside I get stuck when data_end and data_hard_end are too close together.
Thanks,
John
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 29 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper in order to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one.
This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages.Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 ++++++++++++---- net/core/filter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +2
-5@@ -3571,11 +3571,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr) -* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return -* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store
Quoted 8 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 3583
Quoted 8 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +8
-0+* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset) +* Description +* Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second +* buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move +* headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in +* the first fragment.
+ Eric to the discussion
Quoted 5 lines
This is confusing to read. Does this mean I can "move bytes to the second buffer from the first one" or "move bytes from the second buffer to the first one" And what are frame headers? I'm sure I can read below code and work it out, but users reading the header file should be able to parse this.
Our main goal with this helper is to fix the use-case where we request the hw to put L2/L3/L4 headers (and all the TCP options) in the first fragment and TCP data starting from the second fragment (headers split) but for some reasons the hw puts the TCP options in the second fragment (if we understood correctly this issue has been introduced by Eric @ NetDevConf 0x14). bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header() can fix this use-case moving bytes from the second fragment to the first one (offset > 0) or from the first buffer to the second one (offset < 0).
Quoted 4 lines
Also we want to be able to read all data not just headers. Reading the payload of a TCP packet is equally important for many l7 load balancers.
In order to avoid to slow down performances we require that eBPF sandbox can read/write only buff0 in a xdp multi-buffer. The xdp program can only perform some restricted changes to buff<n> (n >= 1) (e.g. what we did in bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header()).
You can find the xdp multi-buff design principles here [0][1]
[0] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
[1] http://people.redhat.com/lbiancon/conference/NetDevConf2020-0x14/add-xdp-on-driver.html - XDP multi-buffers section (slide 40)
Quoted 68 lines
Quoted 34 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +10
-0+* +* A call to this helper is susceptible to change the underlying +* packet buffer. Therefore, at load time, all checks on pointers +* previously done by the verifier are invalidated and must be +* performed again, if the helper is used in combination with +* direct packet access. +* +* Return +* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -3727,6 +3741,7 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (inode_storage_delete), \FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \ +FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper net/core/filter.c +6
-0@@ -3475,6 +3475,57 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len;net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3493
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ;What if we want data in frags[1] and so on.
Quoted 5 lines
net/core/filter.c +5
-0+ + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + + if (offset < 0 && (-offset > frag_offset ||net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3508
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+ data_end < xdp->data + ETH_HLEN)) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset);But this could get expensive for large amount of data? And also limiting because we require the room to do the copy. Presumably the reason we have fargs[1] is because the normal page or half page is in use?
Quoted 15 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 11 lines
net/core/filter.c +11
-0+ }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); + xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}So overall I don't see the point of copying bytes from one frag to another. Create an API that adjusts the data pointers and then copies are avoided and manipulating frags is not needed.
please see above.
Quoted 7 lines
Also and even more concerning I think this API requires the driver to populate shinfo. If we use
TX_REDIRECTa lot orTX_XMITthis means we need to populate shinfo when its probably not ever used. If our driver is smart L2/L3 headers are in the readable data and prefetched. Writing frags into the end of a page is likely not free.
Sorry I did not get what you mean with "populate shinfo" here. We need to properly set shared_info in order to create the xdp multi-buff. Apart of header splits, please consider the main uses-cases for xdp multi-buff are XDP with TSO and Jumbo frames.
Quoted 2 lines
Did you benchmark this?
will do, I need to understand if we can use tiny buffers in mvneta.
Quoted 17 lines
In general users of this API should know the bytes they want to fetch. Use an API like this,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, start, end)Where xdp is the frame, start is the first byte the user wants and end is the last byte. Then usually you can skip the entire copy part and just move the xdp pointesr around. The ugly case is if the user puts start/end across a frag boundary and a copy is needed. In that case maybe we use end as a hint and not a hard requirement.
The use case I see is I read L2/L3/L4 headers and I need the first N bytes of the payload. I know where the payload starts and I know how many bytes I need so,
Quoted 7 lines
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, payload_offset, bytes_needed);Then hopefully that is all in one frag. If its not I'll need to do a second helper call. Still nicer than forcing drivers to populate this shinfo I think. If you think I'm wrong try a benchmark. Benchmarks aside I get stuck when
data_endanddata_hard_endare too close together.
IIUC what you mean here is to expose L2/L3/L4 headers + some data to the ebpf program to perform like L7 load-balancing, right?
Let's consider the Jumbo frames use-case (so the data are split in multiple buffers). I can see to issues here:
- since in XDP we can't linearize the buffer if start and end are on the different pages (like we do in bpf_msg_pull_data()), are we ending up in the case where requested data are all in buff0?
- if start and end are in buff<2>, we should report the fragment number to the ebpf program to "fetch" the data. Are we exposing too low-level details to user-space?
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks,
John
John Fastabend
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 47 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 29 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Introduce
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper in order to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one.
This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages.Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 ++++++++++++---- net/core/filter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +2
-5@@ -3571,11 +3571,25 @@ union bpf_attr {* value. * * long bpf_copy_from_user(void *dst, u32 size, const void *user_ptr) -* Description -* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store -* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). -* Return -* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* Description +* Read *size* bytes from user space address *user_ptr* and store Quoted 8 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h union bpf_attr { · line 3583
Quoted 8 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +8
-0+* the data in *dst*. This is a wrapper of copy_from_user(). +* +* long bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, int offset) +* Description +* Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second +* buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move +* headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in +* the first fragment. + Eric to the discussion
Quoted 5 lines
This is confusing to read. Does this mean I can "move bytes to the second buffer from the first one" or "move bytes from the second buffer to the first one" And what are frame headers? I'm sure I can read below code and work it out, but users reading the header file should be able to parse this.
Quoted 7 lines
Our main goal with this helper is to fix the use-case where we request the hw to put L2/L3/L4 headers (and all the TCP options) in the first fragment and TCP data starting from the second fragment (headers split) but for some reasons the hw puts the TCP options in the second fragment (if we understood correctly this issue has been introduced by Eric @ NetDevConf
0x14).bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header()can fix this use-case moving bytes from the second fragment to the first one (offset > 0) or from the first buffer to the second one (offset < 0).
Ah OK, so the description needs the information about how to use offset then it would have been clear I think. Something like that last line "moving bytes from the second fragment ...."
So this is to fixup header-spit for RX zerocopy? Add that to the commit message then.
Quoted 43 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Also we want to be able to read all data not just headers. Reading the payload of a TCP packet is equally important for many l7 load balancers.
In order to avoid to slow down performances we require that eBPF sandbox can read/write only buff0 in a xdp multi-buffer. The xdp program can only perform some restricted changes to buff<n> (n >= 1) (e.g. what we did in
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header()).
You can find the xdp multi-buff design principles here [0][1][0] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
[1] http://people.redhat.com/lbiancon/conference/NetDevConf2020-0x14/add-xdp-on-driver.html - XDP multi-buffers section (slide 40)Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +10
-0+* +* A call to this helper is susceptible to change the underlying +* packet buffer. Therefore, at load time, all checks on pointers +* previously done by the verifier are invalidated and must be +* performed again, if the helper is used in combination with +* direct packet access. +* +* Return +* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -3727,6 +3741,7 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (inode_storage_delete), \FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \ +FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper net/core/filter.c +0
-0@@ -3475,6 +3475,57 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, };
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3487
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ;
Not required for this patch necessarily but I think it would be better user experience if instead of EOPNOTSUPP here we did the header split. This would allocate a frag and copy the bytes around as needed. Yes it might be slow if you don't have a frag free in the driver, but if user wants to do header split and their hardware can't do it we would have a way out.
I guess it could be an improvement for later though.
Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 30 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3493
Quoted 6 lines
net/core/filter.c +6
-0+ + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ;What if we want data in frags[1] and so on.
Quoted 5 lines
net/core/filter.c +5
-0+ + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + + if (offset < 0 && (-offset > frag_offset ||net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3508
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+ data_end < xdp->data + ETH_HLEN)) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset);But this could get expensive for large amount of data? And also limiting because we require the room to do the copy. Presumably the reason we have fargs[1] is because the normal page or half page is in use?
Quoted 15 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 11 lines
net/core/filter.c +11
-0+ }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); + xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}So overall I don't see the point of copying bytes from one frag to another. Create an API that adjusts the data pointers and then copies are avoided and manipulating frags is not needed.
Quoted 1 line
please see above.
OK it makes more sense with the context. It doesn't have much if anything to do about making data visible to the BPF program. This is about changing the layout of the frags list.
How/when does the header split go wrong on the mvneta device? I guess this is to fix a real bug/issue not some theoritical one? An example in the commit message would make this concrete. Soemthing like, "When using RX zerocopy to mmap data into userspace application if a packet with [all these wild headers] is received rx zerocopy breaks because header split puts headers X in the data frag confusing apps".
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Also and even more concerning I think this API requires the driver to populate shinfo. If we use
TX_REDIRECTa lot orTX_XMITthis means we need to populate shinfo when its probably not ever used. If our driver is smart L2/L3 headers are in the readable data and prefetched. Writing frags into the end of a page is likely not free.
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry I did not get what you mean with "populate shinfo" here. We need to properly set
shared_infoin order to create the xdp multi-buff. Apart of header splits, please consider the main uses-cases for xdp multi-buff are XDP with TSO and Jumbo frames.
The use case I have in mind is a XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT load balancer. I wont know this at the driver level and now I'll have to write into the back of every page with this shinfo just in case. If header split is working I should never need to even touch the page outside the first N bytes that were DMAd and in cache with DDIO. So its extra overhead for something that is unlikely to happen in the LB case.
If you take the simplest possible program that just returns XDP_TX and run a pkt generator against it. I believe (haven't run any tests) that you will see overhead now just from populating this shinfo. I think it needs to only be done when its needed e.g. when user makes this helper call or we need to build the skb and populate the frags there.
I think a smart driver will just keep the frags list in whatever form it has them (rx descriptors?) and push them over to the tx descriptors without having to do extra work with frag lists.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Did you benchmark this?
will do, I need to understand if we can use tiny buffers in mvneta.
Why tiny buffers? How does mvneta layout the frags when doing header split? Can we just benchmark what mvneta is doing at the end of this patch series?
Also can you try the basic XDP_TX case mentioned above. I don't want this to degrade existing use cases if at all possible.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
In general users of this API should know the bytes they want to fetch. Use an API like this,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, start, end)Where xdp is the frame, start is the first byte the user wants and end is the last byte. Then usually you can skip the entire copy part and just move the xdp pointesr around. The ugly case is if the user puts start/end across a frag boundary and a copy is needed. In that case maybe we use end as a hint and not a hard requirement.
The use case I see is I read L2/L3/L4 headers and I need the first N bytes of the payload. I know where the payload starts and I know how many bytes I need so,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, payload_offset, bytes_needed);
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Then hopefully that is all in one frag. If its not I'll need to do a second helper call. Still nicer than forcing drivers to populate this shinfo I think. If you think I'm wrong try a benchmark. Benchmarks aside I get stuck when
data_endanddata_hard_endare too close together.IIUC what you mean here is to expose L2/L3/L4 headers + some data to the ebpf program to perform like L7 load-balancing, right?
Correct, but with extra context I see in this patch you are trying to build an XDP controlled header split. This seems like a different use case from mine.
Quoted 5 lines
Let's consider the Jumbo frames use-case (so the data are split in multiple buffers). I can see to issues here:
- since in XDP we can't linearize the buffer if start and end are on the different pages (like we do inbpf_msg_pull_data()), are we ending up in the case where requested data are all in buff0?
In this case I would expect either the helper returns how many bytes were pulled in, maybe just (start, end_of_frag) or user can find it from data_end pointer. Here end is just a hint.
Quoted 3 lines
- if start and end are in buff<2>, we should report the fragment number to the ebpf program to "fetch" the data. Are we exposing too low-level details to user-space?
Why do you need the frag number? Just say I want bytes (X,Y) if that happens to be on buff<2> let the helper find it.
I think having a helper to read/write any bytes is important and necessary, but the helper implemented in this patch is something else. I get naming is hard what if we called it xdp_header_split().
Quoted 7 lines
Regards,
LorenzoQuoted 3 lines
Thanks,
John
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 1 line
Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
[...]
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ * Description
+ * Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second
+ * buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move
+ * headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in
+ * the first fragment.+ Eric to the discussion
Quoted 5 lines
This is confusing to read. Does this mean I can "move bytes to the second buffer from the first one" or "move bytes from the second buffer to the first one" And what are frame headers? I'm sure I can read below code and work it out, but users reading the header file should be able to parse this.
Quoted 7 lines
Our main goal with this helper is to fix the use-case where we request the hw to put L2/L3/L4 headers (and all the TCP options) in the first fragment and TCP data starting from the second fragment (headers split) but for some reasons the hw puts the TCP options in the second fragment (if we understood correctly this issue has been introduced by Eric @ NetDevConf
0x14).bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header()can fix this use-case moving bytes from the second fragment to the first one (offset > 0) or from the first buffer to the second one (offset < 0).
Quoted 3 lines
Ah OK, so the description needs the information about how to use offset then it would have been clear I think. Something like that last line "moving bytes from the second fragment ...."
ack, right. I will do in v3.
Quoted 3 lines
So this is to fixup header-spit for RX zerocopy? Add that to the commit message then.
Right. I will improve comments in v3.
Quoted 61 lines
Quoted 44 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Also we want to be able to read all data not just headers. Reading the payload of a TCP packet is equally important for many l7 load balancers.
In order to avoid to slow down performances we require that eBPF sandbox can read/write only buff0 in a xdp multi-buffer. The xdp program can only perform some restricted changes to buff<n> (n >= 1) (e.g. what we did in
bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header()).
You can find the xdp multi-buff design principles here [0][1][0] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
[1] http://people.redhat.com/lbiancon/conference/NetDevConf2020-0x14/add-xdp-on-driver.html - XDP multi-buffers section (slide 40)Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
+ *
+ * A call to this helper is susceptible to change the underlying
+ * packet buffer. Therefore, at load time, all checks on pointers
+ * previously done by the verifier are invalidated and must be
+ * performed again, if the helper is used in combination with
+ * direct packet access.
+ *
+ * Return
+ * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*/
#define__BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)\include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +1
-0FN(unspec), \@@ -3727,6 +3741,7 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (inode_storage_delete), \FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \ +FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper net/core/filter.c +0
-0@@ -3475,6 +3475,57 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, };Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3487
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ;Not required for this patch necessarily but I think it would be better user experience if instead of EOPNOTSUPP here we did the header split. This would allocate a frag and copy the bytes around as needed. Yes it might be slow if you don't have a frag free in the driver, but if user wants to do header split and their hardware can't do it we would have a way out.
Quoted 1 line
I guess it could be an improvement for later though.
I have no a strong opinion on this, I did it in this way to respect the rule "we do not allocate memory for XDP".
@Jesper, David: thoughts?
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 47 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3493
Quoted 8 lines
net/core/filter.c +6
-0+ + sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + + frag_len =skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); +if (offset > frag_len) +return -EINVAL ;What if we want data in frags[1] and so on.
Quoted 5 lines
net/core/filter.c +5
-0+ + frag_offset =skb_frag_off (&sinfo->frags[0 ]); + data_end = xdp->data_end + offset; + + if (offset < 0 && (-offset > frag_offset ||net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3508
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+ data_end < xdp->data + ETH_HLEN)) +return -EINVAL ; + + data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ +if (data_end > data_hard_end) +return -EINVAL ; + + addr =page_address (skb_frag_page (&sinfo->frags[0 ])) + frag_offset; +if (offset >0 ) { +memcpy (xdp->data_end, addr, offset);But this could get expensive for large amount of data? And also limiting because we require the room to do the copy. Presumably the reason we have fargs[1] is because the normal page or half page is in use?
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3519
Quoted 11 lines
net/core/filter.c +11
-0+ }else { +memcpy (addr + offset, xdp->data_end + offset, -offset); +memset (xdp->data_end + offset,0 , -offset); + } + +skb_frag_size_sub (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); +skb_frag_off_add (&sinfo->frags[0 ], offset); + xdp->data_end = data_end; + +return 0 ; +}So overall I don't see the point of copying bytes from one frag to another. Create an API that adjusts the data pointers and then copies are avoided and manipulating frags is not needed.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
please see above.
OK it makes more sense with the context. It doesn't have much if anything to do about making data visible to the BPF program. This is about changing the layout of the frags list.
correct.
Quoted 7 lines
How/when does the header split go wrong on the mvneta device? I guess this is to fix a real bug/issue not some theoritical one? An example in the commit message would make this concrete. Soemthing like, "When using RX zerocopy to mmap data into userspace application if a packet with [all these wild headers] is received rx zerocopy breaks because header split puts headers X in the data frag confusing apps".
This issue does not occur with mvneta since the driver is not capable of performing header split AFAIK. The helper has been introduced to cover the "issue" reported by Eric in his NetDevConf presentation. In order to test the helper I modified the mventa rx napi loop in a controlled way (this patch can't be sent upstream, it is for testing only :))
I will improve commit message in v3.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Also and even more concerning I think this API requires the driver to populate shinfo. If we use
TX_REDIRECTa lot orTX_XMITthis means we need to populate shinfo when its probably not ever used. If our driver is smart L2/L3 headers are in the readable data and prefetched. Writing frags into the end of a page is likely not free.Quoted 4 lines
Sorry I did not get what you mean with "populate shinfo" here. We need to properly set
shared_infoin order to create the xdp multi-buff. Apart of header splits, please consider the main uses-cases for xdp multi-buff are XDP with TSO and Jumbo frames.
Quoted 6 lines
The use case I have in mind is a
XDP_TXorXDP_REDIRECTload balancer. I wont know this at the driver level and now I'll have to write into the back of every page with this shinfo just in case. If header split is working I should never need to even touch the page outside the first N bytes that were DMAd and in cache with DDIO. So its extra overhead for something that is unlikely to happen in the LB case.
So far the skb_shared_info in constructed in mvneta only if the hw splits the received data in multiple buffers (so if the MTU is greater than 1 PAGE, please see comments below). Moreover the shared_info is present only in the first buffer.
Quoted 7 lines
If you take the simplest possible program that just returns
XDP_TXand run a pkt generator against it. I believe (haven't run any tests) that you will see overhead now just from populating this shinfo. I think it needs to only be done when its needed e.g. when user makes this helper call or we need to build the skb and populate the frags there.
sure, I will carry out some tests.
Quoted 4 lines
I think a smart driver will just keep the frags list in whatever form it has them (rx descriptors?) and push them over to the tx descriptors without having to do extra work with frag lists.
I think there are many use-cases where we want to have this info available in xdp_buff/xdp_frame. E.g: let's consider the following Jumbo frame example:
- MTU > 1 PAGE (so we the driver will split the received data in multiple rx descriptors)
- the driver performs a XDP_REDIRECT to a veth or cpumap
Relying on the proposed architecture we could enable GRO in veth or cpumap I guess since we can build a non-linear skb from the xdp multi-buff, right?
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Did you benchmark this?
will do, I need to understand if we can use tiny buffers in mvneta.
Why tiny buffers? How does mvneta layout the frags when doing header split? Can we just benchmark what mvneta is doing at the end of this patch series?
for the moment mvneta can split the received data when the previous buffer is full (e.g. when we the first page is completely written). I want to explore if I can set a tiny buffer (e.g. 128B) as max received buffer to run some performance tests and have some "comparable" results respect to the ones I got when I added XDP support to mvneta.
Quoted 4 lines
Also can you try the basic
XDP_TXcase mentioned above. I don't want this to degrade existing use cases if at all possible.
sure, will do.
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 26 lines
In general users of this API should know the bytes they want to fetch. Use an API like this,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, start, end)Where xdp is the frame, start is the first byte the user wants and end is the last byte. Then usually you can skip the entire copy part and just move the xdp pointesr around. The ugly case is if the user puts start/end across a frag boundary and a copy is needed. In that case maybe we use end as a hint and not a hard requirement.
The use case I see is I read L2/L3/L4 headers and I need the first N bytes of the payload. I know where the payload starts and I know how many bytes I need so,
bpf_xdp_adjust_bytes(xdp, payload_offset, bytes_needed);Then hopefully that is all in one frag. If its not I'll need to do a second helper call. Still nicer than forcing drivers to populate this shinfo I think. If you think I'm wrong try a benchmark. Benchmarks aside I get stuck when
data_endanddata_hard_endare too close together.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
IIUC what you mean here is to expose L2/L3/L4 headers + some data to the ebpf program to perform like L7 load-balancing, right?
Correct, but with extra context I see in this patch you are trying to build an XDP controlled header split. This seems like a different use case from mine.
I agree.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Let's consider the Jumbo frames use-case (so the data are split in multiple buffers). I can see to issues here:
- since in XDP we can't linearize the buffer if start and end are on the different pages (like we do inbpf_msg_pull_data()), are we ending up in the case where requested data are all in buff0?In this case I would expect either the helper returns how many bytes were pulled in, maybe just (start,
end_of_frag) or user can find it fromdata_endpointer. Here end is just a hint.Quoted 3 lines
- if start and end are in buff<2>, we should report the fragment number to the ebpf program to "fetch" the data. Are we exposing too low-level details to user-space?
Quoted 6 lines
Why do you need the frag number? Just say I want bytes (X,Y) if that happens to be on buff<2> let the helper find it.
I think having a helper to read/write any bytes is important and necessary, but the helper implemented in this patch is something else. I get naming is hard what if we called it
xdp_header_split().
ack, sure. I will fix it in v3.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Regards,
LorenzoQuoted 3 lines
Thanks,
John
John Fastabend
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 13 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 1 line
Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ * Description
+ * Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second
+ * buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move
+ * headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in
+ * the first fragment.+ Eric to the discussion
[...]
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3487
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ;Not required for this patch necessarily but I think it would be better user experience if instead of EOPNOTSUPP here we did the header split. This would allocate a frag and copy the bytes around as needed. Yes it might be slow if you don't have a frag free in the driver, but if user wants to do header split and their hardware can't do it we would have a way out.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
I guess it could be an improvement for later though.
I have no a strong opinion on this, I did it in this way to respect the rule "we do not allocate memory for XDP".
@Jesper, David: thoughts?
Consider adding a flags field to the helper so we could do this later with a flag. Then users who want the alloc can set the flag and get it.
[...]
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
How/when does the header split go wrong on the mvneta device? I guess this is to fix a real bug/issue not some theoritical one? An example in the commit message would make this concrete. Soemthing like, "When using RX zerocopy to mmap data into userspace application if a packet with [all these wild headers] is received rx zerocopy breaks because header split puts headers X in the data frag confusing apps".
Quoted 6 lines
This issue does not occur with mvneta since the driver is not capable of performing header split AFAIK. The helper has been introduced to cover the "issue" reported by Eric in his NetDevConf presentation. In order to test the helper I modified the mventa rx napi loop in a controlled way (this patch can't be sent upstream, it is for testing only :))
I will improve commit message in v3.
Ah ok so really there is no users for the helper then IMO just drop the patch until we have a user then.
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Also and even more concerning I think this API requires the driver to populate shinfo. If we use
TX_REDIRECTa lot orTX_XMITthis means we need to populate shinfo when its probably not ever used. If our driver is smart L2/L3 headers are in the readable data and prefetched. Writing frags into the end of a page is likely not free.Quoted 4 lines
Sorry I did not get what you mean with "populate shinfo" here. We need to properly set
shared_infoin order to create the xdp multi-buff. Apart of header splits, please consider the main uses-cases for xdp multi-buff are XDP with TSO and Jumbo frames.Quoted 6 lines
The use case I have in mind is a
XDP_TXorXDP_REDIRECTload balancer. I wont know this at the driver level and now I'll have to write into the back of every page with this shinfo just in case. If header split is working I should never need to even touch the page outside the first N bytes that were DMAd and in cache with DDIO. So its extra overhead for something that is unlikely to happen in the LB case.
Quoted 4 lines
So far the
skb_shared_infoin constructed in mvneta only if the hw splits the received data in multiple buffers (so if the MTU is greater than 1 PAGE, please see comments below). Moreover theshared_infois present only in the first buffer.
Still in a normal L2/L3/L4 use case I expect all the headers you need to be in the fist buffer so its unlikely for use cases that send most traffic via XDP_TX for example to ever need the extra info. In these cases I think you are paying some penalty for having to do the work of populating the shinfo. Maybe its measurable maybe not I'm not sure.
Also if we make it required for multi-buffer than we also need the shinfo on 40gbps or 100gbps nics and now even small costs matter.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
If you take the simplest possible program that just returns
XDP_TXand run a pkt generator against it. I believe (haven't run any tests) that you will see overhead now just from populating this shinfo. I think it needs to only be done when its needed e.g. when user makes this helper call or we need to build the skb and populate the frags there.sure, I will carry out some tests.
Thanks!
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think a smart driver will just keep the frags list in whatever form it has them (rx descriptors?) and push them over to the tx descriptors without having to do extra work with frag lists.
Quoted 8 lines
I think there are many use-cases where we want to have this info available in xdp_buff/xdp_frame. E.g: let's consider the following Jumbo frame example:
- MTU > 1 PAGE (so we the driver will split the received data in multiple rx descriptors)
- the driver performs aXDP_REDIRECTto a veth or cpumapRelying on the proposed architecture we could enable GRO in veth or cpumap I guess since we can build a non-linear skb from the xdp multi-buff, right?
I'm not disputing there are use-cases. But, I'm trying to see if we can cover those without introducing additional latency in other cases. Hence the extra benchmarks request ;)
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Did you benchmark this?
will do, I need to understand if we can use tiny buffers in mvneta.
Why tiny buffers? How does mvneta layout the frags when doing header split? Can we just benchmark what mvneta is doing at the end of this patch series?
Quoted 5 lines
for the moment mvneta can split the received data when the previous buffer is full (e.g. when we the first page is completely written). I want to explore if I can set a tiny buffer (e.g. 128B) as max received buffer to run some performance tests and have some "comparable" results respect to the ones I got when I added XDP support to mvneta.
OK would be great.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Also can you try the basic
XDP_TXcase mentioned above. I don't want this to degrade existing use cases if at all possible.sure, will do.
Thanks!
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 13 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 1 line
Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ * Description
+ * Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second
+ * buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move
+ * headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in
+ * the first fragment.+ Eric to the discussion
[...]
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = { · line 3487
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, + int, offset) +{ +void *data_hard_end, *data_end; +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; +int frag_offset, frag_len; +u8 *addr; + +if (!xdp->mb) +return -EOPNOTSUPP ;Not required for this patch necessarily but I think it would be better user experience if instead of EOPNOTSUPP here we did the header split. This would allocate a frag and copy the bytes around as needed. Yes it might be slow if you don't have a frag free in the driver, but if user wants to do header split and their hardware can't do it we would have a way out.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
I guess it could be an improvement for later though.
I have no a strong opinion on this, I did it in this way to respect the rule "we do not allocate memory for XDP".
@Jesper, David: thoughts?
Consider adding a flags field to the helper so we could do this later with a flag. Then users who want the alloc can set the flag and get it.
[...]
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
How/when does the header split go wrong on the mvneta device? I guess this is to fix a real bug/issue not some theoritical one? An example in the commit message would make this concrete. Soemthing like, "When using RX zerocopy to mmap data into userspace application if a packet with [all these wild headers] is received rx zerocopy breaks because header split puts headers X in the data frag confusing apps".
Quoted 6 lines
This issue does not occur with mvneta since the driver is not capable of performing header split AFAIK. The helper has been introduced to cover the "issue" reported by Eric in his NetDevConf presentation. In order to test the helper I modified the mventa rx napi loop in a controlled way (this patch can't be sent upstream, it is for testing only :))
I will improve commit message in v3.
Quoted 2 lines
Ah ok so really there is no users for the helper then IMO just drop the patch until we have a user then.
I agree, this helper is not strictly related to the series. I added it in v2 to provide another example of using xdp_buff mb bit.
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Also and even more concerning I think this API requires the driver to populate shinfo. If we use
TX_REDIRECTa lot orTX_XMITthis means we need to populate shinfo when its probably not ever used. If our driver is smart L2/L3 headers are in the readable data and prefetched. Writing frags into the end of a page is likely not free.Quoted 4 lines
Sorry I did not get what you mean with "populate shinfo" here. We need to properly set
shared_infoin order to create the xdp multi-buff. Apart of header splits, please consider the main uses-cases for xdp multi-buff are XDP with TSO and Jumbo frames.Quoted 6 lines
The use case I have in mind is a
XDP_TXorXDP_REDIRECTload balancer. I wont know this at the driver level and now I'll have to write into the back of every page with this shinfo just in case. If header split is working I should never need to even touch the page outside the first N bytes that were DMAd and in cache with DDIO. So its extra overhead for something that is unlikely to happen in the LB case.Quoted 4 lines
So far the
skb_shared_infoin constructed in mvneta only if the hw splits the received data in multiple buffers (so if the MTU is greater than 1 PAGE, please see comments below). Moreover theshared_infois present only in the first buffer.Still in a normal L2/L3/L4 use case I expect all the headers you need to be in the fist buffer so its unlikely for use cases that send most traffic via
XDP_TXfor example to ever need the extra info. In these cases I think you are paying some penalty for having to do the work of populating the shinfo. Maybe its measurable maybe not I'm not sure.
Quoted 3 lines
Also if we make it required for multi-buffer than we also need the shinfo on 40gbps or 100gbps nics and now even small costs matter.
Now I realized I used the word "split" in a not clear way here,
I apologize for that.
What I mean is not related "header" split, I am referring to the case where the hw is configured with a given rx buffer size (e.g. 1 PAGE) and we have set a higher MTU/max received size (e.g. 9K).
In this case the hw will "split" the jumbo received frame over multiple rx buffers/descriptors. Populating the "xdp_shared_info" we will forward this layout info to the eBPF sandbox and to a remote driver/cpu.
Please note this use case is not currently covered by XDP so if we develop it a proper way I guess we should not get any performance hit for the legacy single-buffer mode since we will not populate the shared_info for it (I think you refer to the "legacy" use-case in your "normal L2/L3/L4" example, right?)
Anyway I will run some tests to verify the performances for the single buffer use-case are not hit.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 63 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 9 lines
If you take the simplest possible program that just returns
XDP_TXand run a pkt generator against it. I believe (haven't run any tests) that you will see overhead now just from populating this shinfo. I think it needs to only be done when its needed e.g. when user makes this helper call or we need to build the skb and populate the frags there.sure, I will carry out some tests.
Thanks!
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think a smart driver will just keep the frags list in whatever form it has them (rx descriptors?) and push them over to the tx descriptors without having to do extra work with frag lists.
Quoted 8 lines
I think there are many use-cases where we want to have this info available in xdp_buff/xdp_frame. E.g: let's consider the following Jumbo frame example:
- MTU > 1 PAGE (so we the driver will split the received data in multiple rx descriptors)
- the driver performs aXDP_REDIRECTto a veth or cpumapRelying on the proposed architecture we could enable GRO in veth or cpumap I guess since we can build a non-linear skb from the xdp multi-buff, right?
I'm not disputing there are use-cases. But, I'm trying to see if we can cover those without introducing additional latency in other cases. Hence the extra benchmarks request ;)
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Did you benchmark this?
will do, I need to understand if we can use tiny buffers in mvneta.
Why tiny buffers? How does mvneta layout the frags when doing header split? Can we just benchmark what mvneta is doing at the end of this patch series?
Quoted 5 lines
for the moment mvneta can split the received data when the previous buffer is full (e.g. when we the first page is completely written). I want to explore if I can set a tiny buffer (e.g. 128B) as max received buffer to run some performance tests and have some "comparable" results respect to the ones I got when I added XDP support to mvneta.
OK would be great.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Also can you try the basic
XDP_TXcase mentioned above. I don't want this to degrade existing use cases if at all possible.sure, will do.
Thanks!
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] bpf: helpers: add bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header helper
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 13 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 1 line
Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ * Description
+ * Adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second
+ * buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move
+ * headers when the hw DMA SG does not copy all the headers in
+ * the first fragment.+ Eric to the discussion
[...]
[...]
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Still in a normal L2/L3/L4 use case I expect all the headers you need to be in the fist buffer so its unlikely for use cases that send most traffic via
XDP_TXfor example to ever need the extra info. In these cases I think you are paying some penalty for having to do the work of populating the shinfo. Maybe its measurable maybe not I'm not sure.Also if we make it required for multi-buffer than we also need the shinfo on 40gbps or 100gbps nics and now even small costs matter.
Now I realized I used the word "split" in a not clear way here,
I apologize for that.
What I mean is not related "header" split, I am referring to the case where the hw is configured with a given rx buffer size (e.g. 1 PAGE) and we have set a higher MTU/max received size (e.g. 9K).
In this case the hw will "split" the jumbo received frame over multiple rx buffers/descriptors. Populating the "xdp_shared_info" we will forward this layout info to the eBPF sandbox and to a remote driver/cpu.
Please note this use case is not currently covered by XDP so if we develop it a proper way I guess we should not get any performance hit for the legacy single-buffer mode since we will not populate theshared_infofor it (I think you refer to the "legacy" use-case in your "normal L2/L3/L4" example, right?)
Anyway I will run some tests to verify the performances for the single buffer use-case are not hit.
Quoted 2 lines
Regards,
Lorenzo
I carried out some performance measurements on my Espressobin to check if the XDP "single buffer" use-case has been hit introducing xdp multi-buff support. Each test has been carried out sending ~900Kpps (pkt length 64B). The rx buffer size was set to 1 PAGE (default value).
The results are roughly the same:
commit: f2ca673d2cd5 "net: mvneta: fix use of state->speed"
==========================================================
- XDP-DROP: ~ 740 Kpps
- XDP-TX: ~ 286 Kpps
- XDP-PASS + tc drop: ~ 219.5 Kpps
xdp multi-buff:
===============
- XDP-DROP: ~ 739-740 Kpps
- XDP-TX: ~ 285 Kpps
- XDP-PASS + tc drop: ~ 223 Kpps
I will add these results to v3 cover letter.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
If you take the simplest possible program that just returns
XDP_TXand run a pkt generator against it. I believe (haven't run any tests) that you will see overhead now just from populating this shinfo. I think it needs to only be done when its needed e.g. when user makes this helper call or we need to build the skb and populate the frags there.sure, I will carry out some tests.
Thanks!
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think a smart driver will just keep the frags list in whatever form it has them (rx descriptors?) and push them over to the tx descriptors without having to do extra work with frag lists.
Quoted 8 lines
I think there are many use-cases where we want to have this info available in xdp_buff/xdp_frame. E.g: let's consider the following Jumbo frame example:
- MTU > 1 PAGE (so we the driver will split the received data in multiple rx descriptors)
- the driver performs aXDP_REDIRECTto a veth or cpumapRelying on the proposed architecture we could enable GRO in veth or cpumap I guess since we can build a non-linear skb from the xdp multi-buff, right?
I'm not disputing there are use-cases. But, I'm trying to see if we can cover those without introducing additional latency in other cases. Hence the extra benchmarks request ;)
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Did you benchmark this?
will do, I need to understand if we can use tiny buffers in mvneta.
Why tiny buffers? How does mvneta layout the frags when doing header split? Can we just benchmark what mvneta is doing at the end of this patch series?
Quoted 5 lines
for the moment mvneta can split the received data when the previous buffer is full (e.g. when we the first page is completely written). I want to explore if I can set a tiny buffer (e.g. 128B) as max received buffer to run some performance tests and have some "comparable" results respect to the ones I got when I added XDP support to mvneta.
OK would be great.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Also can you try the basic
XDP_TXcase mentioned above. I don't want this to degrade existing use cases if at all possible.sure, will do.
Thanks!
PATCH v2 7/9 bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiFrom: Sameeh Jubran <[email protected]>
The implementation is based on this [0] draft by Jesper D. Brouer.
Provided two new helpers:
* bpf_xdp_get_frag_count()
* bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size()
[0] xdp mb design - https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++++++ net/core/filter.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +14 -0
@@ -3590,6 +3590,18 @@ union bpf_attr {* * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frag_count(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total number of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The number of frags +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total size of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The total size of frags for a given packet. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \
@@ -3742,6 +3754,8 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \ +FN (xdp_get_frag_count), \ +FN (xdp_get_frags_total_size), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
net/core/filter.c +39 -0
@@ -3526,6 +3526,41 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_xdp_get_frag_count, struct xdp_buff*, xdp) +{ +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + +return xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ; +} + +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_get_frag_count_proto = { + .func = bpf_xdp_get_frag_count, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size, struct xdp_buff*, xdp) +{ +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); +int nfrags, i; +int size =0 ; + + nfrags = xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ; + +for (i =0 ; i < nfrags && i <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ; i++) + size +=skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[i]); + +return size; +} + +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size_proto = { + .func = bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_tail, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, int, offset) {void *data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */
@@ -6889,6 +6924,10 @@ xdp_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)return &bpf_xdp_adjust_tail_proto;case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_mb_header:return &bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_xdp_get_frag_count: +return &bpf_xdp_get_frag_count_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_xdp_get_frags_total_size: +return &bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size_proto;case BPF_FUNC_fib_lookup:return &bpf_xdp_fib_lookup_proto;#ifdef CONFIG_INET
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +14 -0
@@ -3591,6 +3591,18 @@ union bpf_attr {* * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frag_count(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total number of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The number of frags +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total size of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The total size of frags for a given packet. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \
@@ -3743,6 +3755,8 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \ +FN (xdp_get_frag_count), \ +FN (xdp_get_frags_total_size), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 7/9] bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support
Quoted 73 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
From: Sameeh Jubran <[email protected]>
The implementation is based on this [0] draft by Jesper D. Brouer.
Provided two new helpers:
*
bpf_xdp_get_frag_count()
*bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size()[0] xdp mb design - https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
Signed-off-by Sameeh Jubran <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++++++ net/core/filter.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +14
-0@@ -3590,6 +3590,18 @@ union bpf_attr {* * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frag_count(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total number of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The number of frags +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total size of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The total size of frags for a given packet. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -3742,6 +3754,8 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \ +FN (xdp_get_frag_count), \ +FN (xdp_get_frags_total_size), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper net/core/filter.c +15
-0@@ -3526,6 +3526,41 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_xdp_get_frag_count, struct xdp_buff*, xdp) +{ +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); + +return xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ; +} + +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_get_frag_count_proto = { + .func = bpf_xdp_get_frag_count, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size, struct xdp_buff*, xdp)
net/core/filter.c static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header_proto = { · line 3553
Quoted 10 lines
net/core/filter.c +10
-0+{ +struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff (xdp); +int nfrags, i; +int size =0 ; + + nfrags = xdp->mb ? sinfo->nr_frags :0 ; + +for (i =0 ; i < nfrags && i <MAX_SKB_FRAGS ; i++) + size +=skb_frag_size (&sinfo->frags[i]); +
I only quickly jumped through series and IMHO this helper should be rewritten/optimized in a way that we bail out as early as possible if !xdp->mb as the rest of the code on that condition will do nothing and i'm not sure if compiler would optimize it.
struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; int nfrags, i; int size = 0; if (!xdp->mb) return 0; sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp); nfrags = min(sinfo->nr_frags, MAX_SKB_FRAGS); for (i = 0; i < nfrags; i++) size += skb_frag_size(&sinfo->frags[i]); return size;
Thoughts?
Quoted 59 lines
net/core/filter.c +14
-0+return size; +} + +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size_proto = { + .func = bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_tail, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, int, offset) {void *data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ @@ -6889,6 +6924,10 @@ xdp_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)return &bpf_xdp_adjust_tail_proto;case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_mb_header:return &bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_xdp_get_frag_count: +return &bpf_xdp_get_frag_count_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_xdp_get_frags_total_size: +return &bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size_proto;case BPF_FUNC_fib_lookup:return &bpf_xdp_fib_lookup_proto;#ifdef CONFIG_INET tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +14
-0@@ -3591,6 +3591,18 @@ union bpf_attr {* * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frag_count(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total number of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The number of frags +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total size of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The total size of frags for a given packet. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -3743,6 +3755,8 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \ +FN (xdp_get_frag_count), \ +FN (xdp_get_frags_total_size), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 7/9] bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support
Quoted 27 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 26 lines
From: Sameeh Jubran <[email protected]>
The implementation is based on this [0] draft by Jesper D. Brouer.
Provided two new helpers:
*
bpf_xdp_get_frag_count()
*bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size()[0] xdp mb design - https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.org
Signed-off-by Sameeh Jubran <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>--- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++++++ net/core/filter.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +0
-0@@ -3590,6 +3590,18 @@ union bpf_attr {* * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
[...]
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 1 line
+
I only quickly jumped through series and IMHO this helper should be rewritten/optimized in a way that we bail out as early as possible if !xdp->mb as the rest of the code on that condition will do nothing and i'm not sure if compiler would optimize it.
struct skb_shared_info *sinfo; int nfrags, i; int size = 0; if (!xdp->mb) return 0; sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp); nfrags = min(sinfo->nr_frags, MAX_SKB_FRAGS); for (i = 0; i < nfrags; i++) size += skb_frag_size(&sinfo->frags[i]); return size;
Quoted 1 line
Thoughts?
I agree.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 61 lines
Quoted 61 lines
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +14
-0+return size; +} + +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size_proto = { + .func = bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type =RET_INTEGER , + .arg1_type =ARG_PTR_TO_CTX , +}; + BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_tail, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, int, offset) {void *data_hard_end =xdp_data_hard_end (xdp);/* use xdp->frame_sz */ @@ -6889,6 +6924,10 @@ xdp_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)return &bpf_xdp_adjust_tail_proto;case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_mb_header:return &bpf_xdp_adjust_mb_header_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_xdp_get_frag_count: +return &bpf_xdp_get_frag_count_proto; +case BPF_FUNC_xdp_get_frags_total_size: +return &bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size_proto;case BPF_FUNC_fib_lookup:return &bpf_xdp_fib_lookup_proto;#ifdef CONFIG_INET tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +14
-0@@ -3591,6 +3591,18 @@ union bpf_attr {* * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frag_count(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total number of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The number of frags +* +* int bpf_xdp_get_frags_total_size(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md) +* Description +* Get the total size of frags for a given packet. +* Return +* The total size of frags for a given packet. */ #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER (FN ) \ FN(unspec), \@@ -3743,6 +3755,8 @@ union bpf_attr {FN (d_path), \FN (copy_from_user), \FN (xdp_adjust_mb_header), \ +FN (xdp_get_frag_count), \ +FN (xdp_get_frags_total_size), \/* */ /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
PATCH v2 8/9 samples/bpf: add bpf program that uses xdp mb helpers
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiFrom: Sameeh Jubran <[email protected]>
The bpf program returns XDP_PASS for every packet and calculates the total number of bytes in its linear and paged parts.
The program is executed with:
./xdp_mb [if name]
and has the following output format:
[if index]: [rx packet count] pkt/sec, [number of bytes] bytes/sec
--- samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 + samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c | 68 ++++++++++++++ samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 253 insertions(+) create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c
samples/bpf/Makefile +3 -0
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ tprogs-y += task_fd_query tprogs-y += xdp_sample_pkts tprogs-y += ibumad tprogs-y += hbm +tprogs-y += xdp_mb # Libbpf dependencies LIBBPF = $(TOOLS_PATH)/lib/bpf/libbpf.a
@@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ task_fd_query-objs := bpf_load.o task_fd_query_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS) xdp_sample_pkts-objs := xdp_sample_pkts_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS) ibumad-objs := bpf_load.o ibumad_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS) hbm-objs := bpf_load.o hbm.o $(CGROUP_HELPERS) +xdp_mb-objs := xdp_mb_user.o # Tell kbuild to always build the programs always-y := $(tprogs-y)
@@ -172,6 +174,7 @@ always-y += ibumad_kern.o always-y += hbm_out_kern.o always-y += hbm_edt_kern.o always-y += xdpsock_kern.o +always-y += xdp_mb_kern.o ifeq ($(ARCH), arm) # Strip all except -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ option needed to handle linux
samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c new file +68 -0
68 lines not on this page · raw message
samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c new file +182 -0
182 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
PATCH v2 9/9 net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP
In reply to Lorenzo BianconiEnable the capability to receive jumbo frames even if the interface is running in XDP mode
--- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +0 -10
@@ -3737,11 +3737,6 @@ static int mvneta_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int mtu) mtu =ALIGN (MVNETA_RX_PKT_SIZE (mtu),8 ); } -if (pp->xdp_prog && mtu >MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE ) { -netdev_info (dev,"Illegal MTU value %d for XDP mode\n" , mtu); -return -EINVAL ; - } - dev->mtu = mtu;if (!netif_running (dev)) {
@@ -4439,11 +4434,6 @@ static int mvneta_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,struct mvneta_port *pp =netdev_priv (dev);struct bpf_prog *old_prog; -if (prog && dev->mtu >MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE ) { -NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Jumbo frames not supported on XDP" ); -return -EOPNOTSUPP ; - } -if (pp->bm_priv) {NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD (extack,"Hardware Buffer Management not supported on XDP" );
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Quoted 3 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
For the moment we have not implemented any self-test for the introduced the bpf helpers. We can address this in a follow up series if the proposed approach is accepted.
selftest has to be part of the same patch set.
Quoted 6 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
Quoted 3 lines
For the moment we have not implemented any self-test for the introduced the bpf helpers. We can address this in a follow up series if the proposed approach is accepted.
selftest has to be part of the same patch set.
sure, I will add it in v3.
Regards,
Lorenzo
John Fastabend
maintainerQuoted 4 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
- Finalize XDP multi-buffer support for mvneta driver introducing the capability to map non-linear buffers on tx side.
- Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify ifshared_infoarea has been properly initialized.
Quoted 8 lines
- Initialize multi-buffer bit (mb) to 0 in all XDP-capable drivers.
- Add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} utility routines.
- Introducebpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages. A possible use case forbpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headeris described here [0]
Are those slides available anywhere? [0] is just a link to the abstract.
Quoted 7 lines
- Introduce
bpf_xdp_get_frag_countandbpf_xdp_get_frags_total_sizehelpers to report the total number/size of frags for a given xdp multi-buff.XDP multi-buffer design principles are described here [1]
For the moment we have not implemented any self-test for the introduced the bpf helpers. We can address this in a follow up series if the proposed approach is accepted.
Will need to include selftests with series.
Quoted 66 lines
Changes since v1:
- Fix use-after-free in xdp_return_{buff/frame}
- Introduce bpf helpers
- Introducexdp_mbsample program
- accessskb_shared_info->nr_fragsonly on the last fragmentChanges since RFC:
- squash multi-buffer bit initialization in a single patch
- add mvneta non-linear XDP buff support for tx side[0] https://netdevconf.info/0x14/session.html?talk-the-path-to-tcp-4k-mtu-and-rx-zerocopy
[1] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.orgLorenzo Bianconi (7):
xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
xdp: initializexdp_buffmb bit to 0 in all XDP drivers
net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
net: mvneta: add multi buffer support toXDP_TX
bpf: helpers: addbpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper
net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDPSameeh Jubran (2):
bpf: helpers: add multibuffer supportsamples/bpf: add bpf program that uses xdp mb helpersdrivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 126 ++++++------ .../net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 1 + .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c | 1 + drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_bpf.c | 1 + drivers/net/tun.c | 2 + drivers/net/veth.c | 1 + drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 + drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 1 + include/net/xdp.h | 26 ++- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 +++- net/core/dev.c | 1 + net/core/filter.c | 93 +++++++++ net/core/xdp.c | 40 ++++ samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 + samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c | 68 +++++++ samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 40 +++- 32 files changed, 572 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.cSignature · 1 line
2.26.2
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 4 lines · Lorenzo Bianconi
- Finalize XDP multi-buffer support for mvneta driver introducing the capability to map non-linear buffers on tx side.
- Introduce multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer to specify ifshared_infoarea has been properly initialized.Quoted 8 lines
- Initialize multi-buffer bit (mb) to 0 in all XDP-capable drivers.
- Add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} utility routines.
- Introducebpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper to adjust frame headers moving *offset* bytes from/to the second buffer to/from the first one. This helper can be used to move headers when the hw DMA SG is not able to copy all the headers in the first fragment and split header and data pages. A possible use case forbpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headeris described here [0]
Quoted 1 line
Are those slides available anywhere? [0] is just a link to the abstract.
Yes, sorry. I would point out where we got the idea for this helper. I do not think the slides are available yet but I guess they will be soon.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
- Introduce
bpf_xdp_get_frag_countandbpf_xdp_get_frags_total_sizehelpers to report the total number/size of frags for a given xdp multi-buff.XDP multi-buffer design principles are described here [1]
For the moment we have not implemented any self-test for the introduced the bpf helpers. We can address this in a follow up series if the proposed approach is accepted.Will need to include selftests with series.
Sure, I will add selftests in v3.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Quoted 69 lines
Quoted 67 lines
Changes since v1:
- Fix use-after-free in xdp_return_{buff/frame}
- Introduce bpf helpers
- Introducexdp_mbsample program
- accessskb_shared_info->nr_fragsonly on the last fragmentChanges since RFC:
- squash multi-buffer bit initialization in a single patch
- add mvneta non-linear XDP buff support for tx side[0] https://netdevconf.info/0x14/session.html?talk-the-path-to-tcp-4k-mtu-and-rx-zerocopy
[1] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/core/xdp-multi-buffer01-design.orgLorenzo Bianconi (7):
xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
xdp: initializexdp_buffmb bit to 0 in all XDP drivers
net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
net: mvneta: add multi buffer support toXDP_TX
bpf: helpers: addbpf_xdp_adjust_mb_headerhelper
net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDPSameeh Jubran (2):
bpf: helpers: add multibuffer supportsamples/bpf: add bpf program that uses xdp mb helpersdrivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 126 ++++++------ .../net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 1 + .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 1 + .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c | 1 + drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_bpf.c | 1 + drivers/net/tun.c | 2 + drivers/net/veth.c | 1 + drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 + drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 1 + include/net/xdp.h | 26 ++- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 +++- net/core/dev.c | 1 + net/core/filter.c | 93 +++++++++ net/core/xdp.c | 40 ++++ samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 + samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c | 68 +++++++ samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 40 +++- 32 files changed, 572 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_kern.c create mode 100644 samples/bpf/xdp_mb_user.cSignature · 1 line
2.26.2