Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare Engine(DCC) for SM8150

PATCH Superseded Souradeep Chowdhury 3 participants 17 messages Mar 10, 2021 – Mar 14, 2021

Subsystems (3)

v1 of 6 Superseded Latest is v6 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare Engine(DCC) for SM8150

DCC(Data Capture and Compare) is a DMA engine designed for debugging purposes. In case of a system crash or manual software triggers by the user the DCC hardware stores the value at the register addresses which can be used for debugging purposes. The DCC driver provides the user with sysfs interface to configure the register addresses. The options that the DCC hardware provides include reading from registers, writing to registers, first reading and then writing to registers and looping through the values of the same register.

In certain cases a register write needs to be executed for accessing the rest of the registers, also the user might want to record the changing values of a particular register with time for which he has the option to use the loop feature. The options mentioned above are exposed to the user by sysfs files once the driver is probed. The details and usage of this sysfs files are documented in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc. As an example if a user wants to configure to store 100 words starting from address 0x80000050 he should give inputs as following to the sysfs config file:-

echo 0x80000050 100 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config

Similarly if the user wants to write to a register using DCC hardware he should give following input to config_write sysfs file:-
echo 0x80000000 0xFF > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config_write
All this read and write occurs at crash time or if the user manually invokes a software trigger.

Souradeep Chowdhury (6):
dt-bindings: Added the yaml bindings for DCC
soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare
unit(DCC)
soc: qcom: dcc: Add the sysfs variables to the Data Capture and
Compare driver(DCC)
DCC: Added the sysfs entries for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver
MAINTAINERS: Add the entry for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver
support
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add Data Capture and Compare(DCC) support
node

 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc         |   74 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml      |   49 +
 MAINTAINERS                                        |    8 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi               |    7 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig                           |    8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile                          |    1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c                             | 1551 ++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 1698 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/6 dt-bindings: Added the yaml bindings for DCC

Documentation for Data Capture and Compare(DCC) device tree bindings in yaml format.

---
 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml      | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml new file +49 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8e9998
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Data Capture and Compare
+
+maintainers:
+  - Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+
+description: |
+    DCC (Data Capture and Compare) is a DMA engine which is used to save
+    configuration data or system memory contents during catastrophic failure
+    or SW trigger. DCC is used to capture and store data for debugging purpose
+
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - enum:
+          - qcom,sm8150-dcc
+      - const: qcom,dcc
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: DCC base register region
+      - description: DCC RAM base register region
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: dcc-base
+      - const: dcc-ram-base
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    dcc@10a2000{
+                compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dcc","qcom,dcc";
+                reg = <0x010a2000  0x1000>,
+                      <0x010ad000  0x2000>;
+                reg-names = "dcc-base", "dcc-ram-base";
+    };
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 1/6] dt-bindings: Added the yaml bindings for DCC

Quoted 38 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

Documentation for Data Capture and Compare(DCC) device tree bindings in yaml format.

---
 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml      | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml new file +23 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8e9998
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Data Capture and Compare
+
+maintainers:
+  - Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+
+description: |
+    DCC (Data Capture and Compare) is a DMA engine which is used to save
+    configuration data or system memory contents during catastrophic failure
+    or SW trigger. DCC is used to capture and store data for debugging purpose
+
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - enum:
+          - qcom,sm8150-dcc
+      - const: qcom,dcc

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml line 33

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml new file +10 -0
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: DCC base register region
+      - description: DCC RAM base register region
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: dcc-base
+      - const: dcc-ram-base

Please omit the "-base" suffix from the reg-names.

Regards,
Bjorn

Quoted 20 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml new file +16 -0
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    dcc@10a2000{
+                compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dcc","qcom,dcc";
+                reg = <0x010a2000  0x1000>,
+                      <0x010ad000  0x2000>;
+                reg-names = "dcc-base", "dcc-ram-base";
+    };
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#3 lore raw

PATCH 2/6 soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

In reply to Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c    | 388 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 397 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c
drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig +8 -0
index 79b568f..8819e0b 100644
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ config QCOM_LLCC
 	  SDM845. This provides interfaces to clients that use the LLCC.
 	  Say yes here to enable LLCC slice driver.
 
+config QCOM_DCC
+	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Data Capture and Compare engine driver"
+	depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This option enables driver for Data Capture and Compare engine. DCC
+	  driver provides interface to configure DCC block and read back
+	  captured data from DCC's internal SRAM.
+
 config QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS
 	bool
 	depends on ARCH_QCOM && ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile +1 -0
index ad675a6..1b00870 100644
@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_LLCC) += llcc-qcom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMHPD) += rpmhpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMPD) += rpmpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS) +=	kryo-l2-accessors.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_DCC) += dcc.o
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +388 -0

388 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Quoted 53 lines
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c    | 388 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 397 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c
drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig +8 -0
index 79b568f..8819e0b 100644
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ config QCOM_LLCC
 	  SDM845. This provides interfaces to clients that use the LLCC.
 	  Say yes here to enable LLCC slice driver.
 
+config QCOM_DCC
+	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Data Capture and Compare engine driver"
+	depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This option enables driver for Data Capture and Compare engine. DCC
+	  driver provides interface to configure DCC block and read back
+	  captured data from DCC's internal SRAM.
+
 config QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS
 	bool
 	depends on ARCH_QCOM && ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile +1 -0
index ad675a6..1b00870 100644
@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_LLCC) += llcc-qcom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMHPD) += rpmhpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMPD) += rpmpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS) +=	kryo-l2-accessors.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_DCC) += dcc.o
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +11 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89816bf
@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/cdev.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 21

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+
+#define dcc_readl(drvdata, off)						\
+	readl(drvdata->base + dcc_offset_conv(drvdata, off))

This is only used in probe, please just inline it, and use (a) local variable(s) to avoid the lengthy lines.

Quoted 21 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +21 -0
+
+/* DCC registers */
+#define DCC_HW_INFO			0x04
+#define DCC_LL_NUM_INFO			0x10
+
+#define DCC_MAP_LEVEL1			0x18
+#define DCC_MAP_LEVEL2			0x34
+#define DCC_MAP_LEVEL3			0x4C
+
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET1			0x10
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET2			0x18
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET3			0x1C
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET4			0x8
+
+#define DCC_FIX_LOOP_OFFSET		16
+#define DCC_VER_INFO_BIT		9
+
+#define DCC_MAX_LINK_LIST		8
+#define DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+#define DCC_VER_MASK1			GENMASK(6, 0)

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 52

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+#define DCC_VER_MASK2			GENMASK(5, 0)
+
+#define DCC_RD_MOD_WR_ADDR		0xC105E
+
+struct qcom_dcc_config {
+	const int dcc_ram_offset;
+};
+
+enum dcc_mem_map_ver {
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1,

As these are just integers, I would suggest skipping them. If you really like them I would like to see VER1 = 1, to make any future debugging easier.

Quoted 39 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +39 -0
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2,
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER3
+};
+
+enum dcc_descriptor_type {
+	DCC_ADDR_TYPE,
+	DCC_LOOP_TYPE,
+	DCC_READ_WRITE_TYPE,
+	DCC_WRITE_TYPE
+};
+
+struct dcc_config_entry {
+	u32				base;
+	u32				offset;
+	u32				len;
+	u32				index;
+	u32				loop_cnt;
+	u32				write_val;
+	u32				mask;
+	bool				apb_bus;
+	enum dcc_descriptor_type	desc_type;
+	struct list_head		list;
+};
+
+struct dcc_drvdata {
+	void __iomem		*base;
+	u32			reg_size;
+	struct device		*dev;
+	struct mutex		mutex;
+	void __iomem		*ram_base;
+	u32			ram_size;
+	u32			ram_offset;
+	enum dcc_mem_map_ver	mem_map_ver;
+	u32			ram_cfg;
+	u32			ram_start;
+	bool			*enable;
+	bool			*configured;
+	bool			interrupt_disable;
+	char			*sram_node;

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 101

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+	struct cdev		sram_dev;
+	struct class		*sram_class;
+	struct list_head	*cfg_head;
+	u32			*nr_config;
+	u32			nr_link_list;
+	u8			curr_list;
+	u8			loopoff;
+};
+
+static u32 dcc_offset_conv(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, u32 off)

I don't see a reason for specifying that the parameter and return value are 32-bit unsigned ints, please use a generic data type...Like size_t

Quoted 14 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +14 -0
+{
+	if (drvdata->mem_map_ver == DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1) {
+		if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL3)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET3);
+		if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL2)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET2);
+		else if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL1)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET1);
+	} else if (drvdata->mem_map_ver == DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2) {
+		if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL2)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET4);
+	}
+	return off;
+}

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 125

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+
+static void dcc_config_reset(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry, *temp;
+	int curr_list;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	for (curr_list = 0; curr_list < drvdata->nr_link_list; curr_list++) {
+

Unnecessary newline.

Quoted 20 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +20 -0
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, temp,
+			&drvdata->cfg_head[curr_list], list) {
+			list_del(&entry->list);
+			devm_kfree(drvdata->dev, entry);
+			drvdata->nr_config[curr_list]--;
+		}
+	}
+	drvdata->ram_start = 0;
+	drvdata->ram_cfg = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+}
+
+static int dcc_sram_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
+		struct dcc_drvdata,
+		sram_dev);
+	file->private_data = drvdata;
+
+	return	0;

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 155

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+}
+
+static ssize_t dcc_sram_read(struct file *file, char __user *data,
+						size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	unsigned char *buf;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = file->private_data;
+
+	/* EOF check */
+	if (drvdata->ram_size <= *ppos)

"Is ppos beyond the EOF" is better expressed as:

	if (*ppos >= drvdata->ram_size)

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 165

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+		return 0;
+
+	if ((*ppos + len) > drvdata->ram_size)
+		len = (drvdata->ram_size - *ppos);
+
+	buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memcpy_fromio(buf, (drvdata->ram_base + *ppos), len);

Parenthesis are unnecessary.

Quoted 22 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +22 -0
+
+	if (copy_to_user(data, buf, len)) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: Couldn't copy all data to user\n");
+		kfree(buf);
+		return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	*ppos += len;
+
+	kfree(buf);
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations dcc_sram_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.open		= dcc_sram_open,
+	.read		= dcc_sram_read,
+	.llseek		= no_llseek,
+};
+
+static int dcc_sram_dev_register(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 197

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct device *device;
+	dev_t dev;
+
+	ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&dev, 0, 1, drvdata->sram_node);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_alloc;
+
+	cdev_init(&drvdata->sram_dev, &dcc_sram_fops);

How about implementing this using pstore instead of exposing it through a custom /dev/dcc_sram (if I read the code correclty)

Quoted 39 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +39 -0
+
+	drvdata->sram_dev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	ret = cdev_add(&drvdata->sram_dev, dev, 1);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_cdev_add;
+
+	drvdata->sram_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, drvdata->sram_node);
+	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->sram_class)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(drvdata->sram_class);
+		goto err_class_create;
+	}
+
+	device = device_create(drvdata->sram_class, NULL,
+						drvdata->sram_dev.dev, drvdata,
+						drvdata->sram_node);
+	if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(device);
+		goto err_dev_create;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+err_dev_create:
+	class_destroy(drvdata->sram_class);
+err_class_create:
+	cdev_del(&drvdata->sram_dev);
+err_cdev_add:
+	unregister_chrdev_region(drvdata->sram_dev.dev, 1);
+err_alloc:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void dcc_sram_dev_deregister(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	device_destroy(drvdata->sram_class, drvdata->sram_dev.dev);
+	class_destroy(drvdata->sram_class);
+	cdev_del(&drvdata->sram_dev);
+	unregister_chrdev_region(drvdata->sram_dev.dev, 1);
+}
+

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 246

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+static int dcc_sram_dev_init(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	size_t node_size;
+	char *node_name = "dcc_sram";
+	struct device *dev = drvdata->dev;
+
+	node_size = strlen(node_name) + 1;
+
+	drvdata->sram_node = devm_kzalloc(dev, node_size, GFP_KERNEL);

kzalloc + strlcpy can be replaced by kstrdup(), but that said...all this does seems to be to copy a const string to the heap and lugging it around. Use a define instead.

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +11 -0
+	if (!drvdata->sram_node)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	strlcpy(drvdata->sram_node, node_name, node_size);
+	ret = dcc_sram_dev_register(drvdata);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: sram node not registered.\n");
+
+	return ret;
+}
+

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 267

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+static void dcc_sram_dev_exit(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	dcc_sram_dev_deregister(drvdata);
+}
+
+static int dcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret = 0, i;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata;

I think "dcc" would be a better name than "drvdata"...

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 278

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +11 -0
+	struct resource *res;
+	const struct qcom_dcc_config *cfg;
+
+	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!drvdata)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	drvdata->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dcc-base");

platform_get_resource_byname() + devm_ioremap() is done in one go using devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 282

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+	if (!res)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	drvdata->reg_size = resource_size(res);

reg_size is unused outside this assignment, no need to lug it around in drvdata.

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 283

Quoted 1 line
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +1 -0
+	drvdata->base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));

drvdata->base is only accessed from this function, use a local variable instead.

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 288

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	if (!drvdata->base)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
+							"dcc-ram-base");

Here you're actually carrying the resource size, so it makes sense.

But it's okay not to wrap this line.

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	if (!res)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	drvdata->ram_size = resource_size(res);
+	drvdata->ram_base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 303

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+	if (!drvdata->ram_base)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+	drvdata->ram_offset = cfg->dcc_ram_offset;
+
+	if (FIELD_GET(BIT(DCC_VER_INFO_BIT), dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_HW_INFO))) {
+		drvdata->mem_map_ver = DCC_MEM_MAP_VER3;
+		drvdata->nr_link_list = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_NUM_INFO);
+		if (drvdata->nr_link_list == 0)
+			return	-EINVAL;

Replace the \t in the middle

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +9 -0
+	} else if ((dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_HW_INFO) & DCC_VER_MASK2) == DCC_VER_MASK2) {
+		drvdata->mem_map_ver = DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2;
+		drvdata->nr_link_list = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_NUM_INFO);
+		if (drvdata->nr_link_list == 0)
+			return	-EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		drvdata->mem_map_ver = DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1;
+		drvdata->nr_link_list = DCC_MAX_LINK_LIST;
+	}

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 322

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+
+	if ((dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_HW_INFO) & BIT(6)) == BIT(6))
+		drvdata->loopoff = DCC_FIX_LOOP_OFFSET;
+	else
+		drvdata->loopoff = get_bitmask_order((drvdata->ram_size +
+				drvdata->ram_offset) / 4 - 1);
+	mutex_init(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	drvdata->enable = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(bool), GFP_KERNEL);

kzalloc(, items * sizeof(), ...) is kcalloc()

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 324

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +2 -0
+	if (!drvdata->enable)
+		return -ENOMEM;

Add a newline between each check and the subsequent allocation, or do all the allocation then do a

	if (!dcc->enable || !dcc->configured ...)
		return -ENOMEM;
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+	drvdata->configured = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(bool), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!drvdata->configured)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	drvdata->nr_config = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 340

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+	if (!drvdata->nr_config)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	drvdata->cfg_head = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!drvdata->cfg_head)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_link_list; i++) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drvdata->cfg_head[i]);
+		drvdata->nr_config[i] = 0;

kzalloc() already initialized nr_config.

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 351

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +11 -0
+	}
+
+	memset_io(drvdata->ram_base, 0, drvdata->ram_size);
+
+	drvdata->curr_list = DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST;
+
+	ret = dcc_sram_dev_init(drvdata);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err;
+
+	return ret;

We know ret is 0 here, but if you rename "err" to "out" and move it above this line you can reuse return.

Quoted 12 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +12 -0
+err:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int dcc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	dcc_sram_dev_exit(drvdata);
+
+	dcc_config_reset(drvdata);
+

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 373

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct qcom_dcc_config sm8150_cfg = {
+	.dcc_ram_offset                         = 0x5000,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id dcc_match_table[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dcc", .data = &sm8150_cfg },
+};

MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dcc_match_table);

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 376

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +3 -0
+
+static struct platform_driver dcc_driver = {
+	.probe					= dcc_probe,

The indentation here is excessive, feel free to use a single space.

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 379

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +3 -0
+	.remove					= dcc_remove,
+	.driver					= {
+		.name		= "msm-dcc",

We tend to not use "msm" anymore, so how about "qcom-dcc"?

PS. It's hard to comment on some of the things in this patch, as they are not used until the next patch...

Regards,
Bjorn

Quoted 13 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +9 -0
+		.of_match_table	= dcc_match_table,
+	},
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(dcc_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm Technologies Inc. DCC driver");
+
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

Hi Bjorn,

Quoted 12 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

Quoted 4 lines

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Not just the next boot, but also for the current boot via /dev/dcc_sram, more below.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c    | 388 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 397 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c

<snip>...

Quoted 4 lines

How about implementing this using pstore instead of exposing it through a custom /dev/dcc_sram (if I read the code correclty)

Using pstore is definitely a good suggestion, we have been thinking of adding it as a separate change once the basic support for DCC gets in. But pstore ram backend again depends on warm reboot which is present only in chrome compute platforms but android platforms do not officially support warm reboot. Pstore with block devices as a backend would be ideal but it is still a work in progress to use mmc as the backend [1].

Now the other reason as to why we need this dev interface in addition to pstore,

* Pstore contents are retrieved on the next boot, but DCC SRAM contents can be collected via dev interface for the current boot via SW
trigger.
Lets say we have some non-fatal errors in one of the subsystems and
we
want to analyze the register values, it becomes as simple as
configuring
that region, trigger dcc and collect the sram contents and parse it.

   echo "addr" > /sys/bus/platform/devices/***.dcc/config
   echo  1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/***.dcc/trigger
   cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram.bin
   python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram.bin --v2 -o output/

We don't have to reboot at all for SW triggers. This is very useful and widely used internally.

Is the custom /dev/dcc_sram not recommended because of the dependency on the userspace component being not available openly? If so, we already have the dcc parser upstream which we use to extract the sram contents [2].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/platform/vendor/qcom-opensource/tools/tree/dcc_parser

Thanks,
Sai

Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

Quoted 15 lines · Sai Prakash Ranjan

Hi Bjorn,

Quoted 12 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Not just the next boot, but also for the current boot via /dev/dcc_sram, more below.

Interesting!

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c    | 388
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 397 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c

<snip>...

Quoted 4 lines

How about implementing this using pstore instead of exposing it through a custom /dev/dcc_sram (if I read the code correclty)

Quoted 7 lines

Using pstore is definitely a good suggestion, we have been thinking of adding it as a separate change once the basic support for DCC gets in. But pstore ram backend again depends on warm reboot which is present only in chrome compute platforms but android platforms do not officially support warm reboot. Pstore with block devices as a backend would be ideal but it is still a work in progress to use mmc as the backend [1].

I was under the impression that we can have multiple pstore implementations active, so we would have ramoops and dcc presented side by side after such restart. Perhaps that's a misunderstanding on my part?

Quoted 14 lines

Now the other reason as to why we need this dev interface in addition to pstore,

* Pstore contents are retrieved on the next boot, but DCC SRAM contents can be collected via dev interface for the current boot via SW trigger. Lets say we have some non-fatal errors in one of the subsystems and we want to analyze the register values, it becomes as simple as configuring that region, trigger dcc and collect the sram contents and parse it.

   echo "addr" > /sys/bus/platform/devices/***.dcc/config
   echo  1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/***.dcc/trigger
   cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram.bin
   python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram.bin --v2 -o output/
Quoted 7 lines

We don't have to reboot at all for SW triggers. This is very useful and widely used internally.

Is the custom /dev/dcc_sram not recommended because of the dependency on the userspace component being not available openly? If so, we already have the dcc parser upstream which we use to extract the sram contents [2].

My concern is that we come up with a custom chardev implementation for something that already exists or should exist in a more generic form.

In the runtime sequence above, why don't you have trigger just generate a devcoredump? But perhaps the answer is that we want a unified interface between the restart and runtime use cases?

It would be nice to have some more details of how I can use this and how to operate the sysfs interface to achieve that, would you be able to elaborate on this?

Regards,
Bjorn

Quoted 10 lines

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/platform/vendor/qcom-opensource/tools/tree/dcc_parser

Thanks,
Sai

Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

Quoted 53 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 15 lines · Sai Prakash Ranjan

Hi Bjorn,

Quoted 12 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Not just the next boot, but also for the current boot via /dev/dcc_sram, more below.

Interesting!

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c    | 388
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 397 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c

<snip>...

Quoted 4 lines

How about implementing this using pstore instead of exposing it through a custom /dev/dcc_sram (if I read the code correclty)

Quoted 7 lines

Using pstore is definitely a good suggestion, we have been thinking of adding it as a separate change once the basic support for DCC gets in. But pstore ram backend again depends on warm reboot which is present only in chrome compute platforms but android platforms do not officially support warm reboot. Pstore with block devices as a backend would be ideal but it is still a work in progress to use mmc as the backend [1].

Quoted 5 lines

I was under the impression that we can have multiple pstore implementations active, so we would have ramoops and dcc presented side by side after such restart. Perhaps that's a misunderstanding on my part?

If you mean pstore backends(persistent ram and block device) as the implementations, then yes they can separately coexist, but blk device as the backend is not fully ready and ramoops only guarantees traces if the DDR contents are retained i.e., on warm reboot.

In case of ramoops, we currently have console-ramoops, dmesg-ramoops, ftrace-ramoops, pmsg-ramoops. We cannot add dcc-ramoops directly like this as DCC is very platform specific(and QTI specific).

I wanted to add something like device-ramoops/misc-ramoops where the device drivers could register with pstore and provide some useful debug information but the size of ramoops reserved is usually very small and is divided among all of these. So even if lets say we add DCC today and later on multiple devices which are present in the same SoC, then the reserved memory will not be enough and its not easy to properly divide the memory regions to these devices within device-ramoops, there needs to be some sort of dynamic reservation as the device probes, so its currently on hold.

One other reason is the firmware being smart, such as depthcharge [1] which deletes the ramoops DT node when it loads Kernel+DTB image and adds its own ramoops node with the size it prefers(which is small) and so we would need a firmware side change as well to accomodate dcc-ramoops.

Given so many dependencies for pstore ramoops, making it as a primary way to get DCC trace logs doesn't seem right, we can add it as an addon feature.

[1] https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/refs/heads/main/src/boot/ramoops.c#41

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines

Now the other reason as to why we need this dev interface in addition to pstore,

* Pstore contents are retrieved on the next boot, but DCC SRAM contents can be collected via dev interface for the current boot via SW trigger. Lets say we have some non-fatal errors in one of the subsystems and we want to analyze the register values, it becomes as simple as configuring that region, trigger dcc and collect the sram contents and parse it.

   echo "addr" > /sys/bus/platform/devices/***.dcc/config
   echo  1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/***.dcc/trigger
   cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram.bin
   python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram.bin --v2 -o output/

We don't have to reboot at all for SW triggers. This is very useful and widely used internally.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Is the custom /dev/dcc_sram not recommended because of the dependency on the userspace component being not available openly? If so, we already have the dcc parser upstream which we use to extract the sram contents [2].

My concern is that we come up with a custom chardev implementation for something that already exists or should exist in a more generic form.

Sorry if I misunderstood this comment, but DCC is part of QDSS(Qualcomm Debug SubSystem) and is specific to QTI. We have Coresight TMC ETR/ETF exposing similar dev interfaces which is somewhat similar to DCC in the sense that ETF has its own internal RAM and DCC has the internal SRAM but they are 2 different hardware IPs. Even in case of ETF, we can collect the live trace on the target via dev interface and then decode it or collect ramdumps in case of fatal crashes and then extract trace binary and decode it. So looks like such dev interface already exists for other hardwares and works pretty well for the specific usecases.

Quoted 5 lines

In the runtime sequence above, why don't you have trigger just generate a devcoredump? But perhaps the answer is that we want a unified interface between the restart and runtime use cases?

Yes, in case of restart i.e., warm reboot since DCC SRAM contents are retained, we can use the dev interface itself on the next reboot to collect dcc logs if the memory is not zeroed out which I think current driver code does which needs to be fixed.

Quoted 5 lines

It would be nice to have some more details of how I can use this and how to operate the sysfs interface to achieve that, would you be able to elaborate on this?

Agreed, this needs more documentation. I will give one real world example on SC7180 SoC based board where this could have been used, Souradeep can add more and document it in cover letter for the next version of the patchset.

Example: (Addresses configured here are just examples and not related to actual timestamp clks)

On SC7180, there was a coresight timestamp issue where it would occasionally be all 0 instead of proper timestamp values.

Proper timestamp:
Idx:3373; ID:10; I_TIMESTAMP : Timestamp.; Updated val = 0x13004d8f5b7aa; CC=0x9e

Zero timestamp:
Idx:3387; ID:10; I_TIMESTAMP : Timestamp.; Updated val = 0x0; CC=0xa2

Now this is a non-fatal issue and doesn't need a system reset, but still needs to be rootcaused and fixed for those who do care about coresight etm traces. Since this is a timestamp issue, we would be looking for any timestamp related clocks and such.

So we get all the clk register details from IP documentation and configure it via DCC config syfs node. Before that we set the current linked list.

/* Set the current linked list */
echo 3 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/curr_list

/* Program the linked list with the addresses */ echo 0x10c004 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config echo 0x10c008 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config echo 0x10c00c > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config echo 0x10c010 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config ..... and so on for other timestamp related clk registers

/* Other way of specifying is in "addr len" pair, in below case it specifies to capture 4 words starting 0x10C004 */

echo 0x10C004 4 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config

/* Enable DCC */
echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/enable

/* Run the timestamp test for working case */

/* Send SW trigger */
echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/trigger

/* Read SRAM */
cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram1.bin

/* Run the timestamp test for non-working case */

/* Send SW trigger */
echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/trigger

/* Read SRAM */
cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram2.bin

Get the parser from [1] and checkout the latest branch.

/* Parse the SRAM bin */
python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram1.bin --v2 -o output/ python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram2.bin --v2 -o output/

Sample parsed output of dcc_sram1.bin:

localhost ~ # cat dcc_captured_data.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hwioDump version="1">

        <timestamp>03/14/21</timestamp>
        <generator>Linux DCC Parser</generator>
        <chip name="None" version="None">
                <register address="0x0010c004" value="0x80000000" />
                <register address="0x0010c008" value="0x00000008" />
                <register address="0x0010c00c" value="0x80004220" />
                <register address="0x0010c010" value="0x80000000" />
        </chip>
        <next_ll_offset>next_ll_offset : 0x1c </next_ll_offset>

</hwioDump>

Now compare the parsed output for dcc_sram1.bin and dcc_sram2.bin, we will find that one of these register values in working case and non-working case is different which when cross checked with IP doc would give us the idea of what is going wrong with the timestamp clks and would help to debug further.

[1] https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/platform/vendor/qcom-opensource/tools/tree/dcc_parser

PS: We didn't use DCC to debug this coresight timestamp issue but could have used it and this example demonstrates the capability of DCC and I ran with these above with actual timestamp clk registers and it works as demonstrated here, so it's a working example.

Thanks,
Sai

Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

In reply to Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 12 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

Quoted 3 lines

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Replied by Sai

Quoted 63 lines
Quoted 63 lines
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   8 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c    | 388 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 397 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c
drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig +2 -0
index 79b568f..8819e0b 100644
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ config QCOM_LLCC
 	  SDM845. This provides interfaces to clients that use the LLCC.
 	  Say yes here to enable LLCC slice driver.
 
+config QCOM_DCC
+	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Data Capture and Compare 

engine driver"

drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig +3 -0
+	depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This option enables driver for Data Capture and Compare engine. 

DCC

drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig +3 -0
+	  driver provides interface to configure DCC block and read back
+	  captured data from DCC's internal SRAM.
+
 config QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS
 	bool
 	depends on ARCH_QCOM && ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile +1 -0
index ad675a6..1b00870 100644
@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_LLCC) += llcc-qcom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMHPD) += rpmhpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMPD) += rpmpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS) +=	kryo-l2-accessors.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_DCC) += dcc.o
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +3 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89816bf
@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 

reserved.
+ */

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +12 -0
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/cdev.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 21

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+
+#define dcc_readl(drvdata, off)						\
+	readl(drvdata->base + dcc_offset_conv(drvdata, off))

This is only used in probe, please just inline it, and use (a) local variable(s) to avoid the lengthy lines.

This has been used at a lot of places in the subsequent patch. I will be sharing the combined patch in the next version for better clarity.

Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +27 -0
+
+/* DCC registers */
+#define DCC_HW_INFO			0x04
+#define DCC_LL_NUM_INFO			0x10
+
+#define DCC_MAP_LEVEL1			0x18
+#define DCC_MAP_LEVEL2			0x34
+#define DCC_MAP_LEVEL3			0x4C
+
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET1			0x10
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET2			0x18
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET3			0x1C
+#define DCC_MAP_OFFSET4			0x8
+
+#define DCC_FIX_LOOP_OFFSET		16
+#define DCC_VER_INFO_BIT		9
+
+#define DCC_MAX_LINK_LIST		8
+#define DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+#define DCC_VER_MASK1			GENMASK(6, 0)
+#define DCC_VER_MASK2			GENMASK(5, 0)
+
+#define DCC_RD_MOD_WR_ADDR		0xC105E
+
+struct qcom_dcc_config {
+	const int dcc_ram_offset;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 52

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+};
+
+enum dcc_mem_map_ver {
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1,

As these are just integers, I would suggest skipping them. If you really like them I would like to see VER1 = 1, to make any future debugging easier.

Ack

Quoted 45 lines
Quoted 45 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +44 -0
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2,
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER3
+};
+
+enum dcc_descriptor_type {
+	DCC_ADDR_TYPE,
+	DCC_LOOP_TYPE,
+	DCC_READ_WRITE_TYPE,
+	DCC_WRITE_TYPE
+};
+
+struct dcc_config_entry {
+	u32				base;
+	u32				offset;
+	u32				len;
+	u32				index;
+	u32				loop_cnt;
+	u32				write_val;
+	u32				mask;
+	bool				apb_bus;
+	enum dcc_descriptor_type	desc_type;
+	struct list_head		list;
+};
+
+struct dcc_drvdata {
+	void __iomem		*base;
+	u32			reg_size;
+	struct device		*dev;
+	struct mutex		mutex;
+	void __iomem		*ram_base;
+	u32			ram_size;
+	u32			ram_offset;
+	enum dcc_mem_map_ver	mem_map_ver;
+	u32			ram_cfg;
+	u32			ram_start;
+	bool			*enable;
+	bool			*configured;
+	bool			interrupt_disable;
+	char			*sram_node;
+	struct cdev		sram_dev;
+	struct class		*sram_class;
+	struct list_head	*cfg_head;
+	u32			*nr_config;
+	u32			nr_link_list;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 101

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	u8			curr_list;
+	u8			loopoff;
+};
+
+static u32 dcc_offset_conv(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, u32 off)

I don't see a reason for specifying that the parameter and return value are 32-bit unsigned ints, please use a generic data type...Like size_t

Ack.

Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 19 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +19 -0
+{
+	if (drvdata->mem_map_ver == DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1) {
+		if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL3)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET3);
+		if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL2)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET2);
+		else if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL1)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET1);
+	} else if (drvdata->mem_map_ver == DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2) {
+		if ((off & DCC_VER_MASK1) >= DCC_MAP_LEVEL2)
+			return (off - DCC_MAP_OFFSET4);
+	}
+	return off;
+}
+
+static void dcc_config_reset(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry, *temp;
+	int curr_list;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	for (curr_list = 0; curr_list < drvdata->nr_link_list; curr_list++) 

{
+

Unnecessary newline.

Ack.

Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 21 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +20 -0
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, temp,
+			&drvdata->cfg_head[curr_list], list) {
+			list_del(&entry->list);
+			devm_kfree(drvdata->dev, entry);
+			drvdata->nr_config[curr_list]--;
+		}
+	}
+	drvdata->ram_start = 0;
+	drvdata->ram_cfg = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+}
+
+static int dcc_sram_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
+		struct dcc_drvdata,
+		sram_dev);
+	file->private_data = drvdata;
+
+	return	0;

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 155

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+}
+
+static ssize_t dcc_sram_read(struct file *file, char __user *data,
+						size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	unsigned char *buf;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = file->private_data;
+
+	/* EOF check */
+	if (drvdata->ram_size <= *ppos)

"Is ppos beyond the EOF" is better expressed as:

Quoted 2 lines
	if (*ppos >= drvdata->ram_size)

Ack

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+		return 0;
+
+	if ((*ppos + len) > drvdata->ram_size)
+		len = (drvdata->ram_size - *ppos);
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 165

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+
+	buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memcpy_fromio(buf, (drvdata->ram_base + *ppos), len);

Parenthesis are unnecessary.

Ack

Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +27 -0
+
+	if (copy_to_user(data, buf, len)) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: Couldn't copy all data to user\n");
+		kfree(buf);
+		return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	*ppos += len;
+
+	kfree(buf);
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations dcc_sram_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.open		= dcc_sram_open,
+	.read		= dcc_sram_read,
+	.llseek		= no_llseek,
+};
+
+static int dcc_sram_dev_register(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct device *device;
+	dev_t dev;
+
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 197

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&dev, 0, 1, drvdata->sram_node);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_alloc;
+
+	cdev_init(&drvdata->sram_dev, &dcc_sram_fops);

How about implementing this using pstore instead of exposing it through a custom /dev/dcc_sram (if I read the code correclty)

Replied by Sai

Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 46 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +45 -0
+
+	drvdata->sram_dev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	ret = cdev_add(&drvdata->sram_dev, dev, 1);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_cdev_add;
+
+	drvdata->sram_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, drvdata->sram_node);
+	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->sram_class)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(drvdata->sram_class);
+		goto err_class_create;
+	}
+
+	device = device_create(drvdata->sram_class, NULL,
+						drvdata->sram_dev.dev, drvdata,
+						drvdata->sram_node);
+	if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(device);
+		goto err_dev_create;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+err_dev_create:
+	class_destroy(drvdata->sram_class);
+err_class_create:
+	cdev_del(&drvdata->sram_dev);
+err_cdev_add:
+	unregister_chrdev_region(drvdata->sram_dev.dev, 1);
+err_alloc:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void dcc_sram_dev_deregister(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	device_destroy(drvdata->sram_class, drvdata->sram_dev.dev);
+	class_destroy(drvdata->sram_class);
+	cdev_del(&drvdata->sram_dev);
+	unregister_chrdev_region(drvdata->sram_dev.dev, 1);
+}
+
+static int dcc_sram_dev_init(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	size_t node_size;
+	char *node_name = "dcc_sram";
+	struct device *dev = drvdata->dev;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 246

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+
+	node_size = strlen(node_name) + 1;
+
+	drvdata->sram_node = devm_kzalloc(dev, node_size, GFP_KERNEL);

kzalloc + strlcpy can be replaced by kstrdup(), but that said...all this does seems to be to copy a const string to the heap and lugging it around. Use a define instead.

Ack

Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +15 -0
+	if (!drvdata->sram_node)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	strlcpy(drvdata->sram_node, node_name, node_size);
+	ret = dcc_sram_dev_register(drvdata);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: sram node not registered.\n");
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void dcc_sram_dev_exit(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	dcc_sram_dev_deregister(drvdata);
+}
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 267

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+
+static int dcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret = 0, i;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata;

I think "dcc" would be a better name than "drvdata"...

Ack

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +7 -0
+	struct resource *res;
+	const struct qcom_dcc_config *cfg;
+
+	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!drvdata)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+	drvdata->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 

"dcc-base");

platform_get_resource_byname() + devm_ioremap() is done in one go using devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()

Ack

Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 282

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+	if (!res)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	drvdata->reg_size = resource_size(res);

reg_size is unused outside this assignment, no need to lug it around in drvdata.

Ack

Quoted 5 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 283

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +1 -0
+	drvdata->base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));

drvdata->base is only accessed from this function, use a local variable instead.

drvdata->base has been used in the subsequent patch at other places. Will share the combined patch in next version for better clarity.

Quoted 10 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 288

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	if (!drvdata->base)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
+							"dcc-ram-base");

Here you're actually carrying the resource size, so it makes sense.

But it's okay not to wrap this line.

Ack

Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	if (!res)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	drvdata->ram_size = resource_size(res);
+	drvdata->ram_base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, 

resource_size(res));

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	if (!drvdata->ram_base)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+	drvdata->ram_offset = cfg->dcc_ram_offset;
+
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 303

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +1 -0
+	if (FIELD_GET(BIT(DCC_VER_INFO_BIT), dcc_readl(drvdata, 

DCC_HW_INFO))) {

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +4 -0
+		drvdata->mem_map_ver = DCC_MEM_MAP_VER3;
+		drvdata->nr_link_list = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_NUM_INFO);
+		if (drvdata->nr_link_list == 0)
+			return	-EINVAL;

Replace the \t in the middle

Ack

Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +1 -0
+	} else if ((dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_HW_INFO) & DCC_VER_MASK2) == 

DCC_VER_MASK2) {

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +12 -0
+		drvdata->mem_map_ver = DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2;
+		drvdata->nr_link_list = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_NUM_INFO);
+		if (drvdata->nr_link_list == 0)
+			return	-EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		drvdata->mem_map_ver = DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1;
+		drvdata->nr_link_list = DCC_MAX_LINK_LIST;
+	}
+
+	if ((dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_HW_INFO) & BIT(6)) == BIT(6))
+		drvdata->loopoff = DCC_FIX_LOOP_OFFSET;
+	else
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 322

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+		drvdata->loopoff = get_bitmask_order((drvdata->ram_size +
+				drvdata->ram_offset) / 4 - 1);
+	mutex_init(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	drvdata->enable = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(bool), GFP_KERNEL);

kzalloc(, items * sizeof(), ...) is kcalloc()

Ack

Quoted 5 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +2 -0
+	if (!drvdata->enable)
+		return -ENOMEM;

Add a newline between each check and the subsequent allocation, or do all the allocation then do a

Ack

Quoted 13 lines
	if (!dcc->enable || !dcc->configured ...)
		return -ENOMEM;
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +10 -0
+	drvdata->configured = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(bool), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!drvdata->configured)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	drvdata->nr_config = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!drvdata->nr_config)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	drvdata->cfg_head = devm_kzalloc(dev, drvdata->nr_link_list *
+			sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 340

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+	if (!drvdata->cfg_head)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_link_list; i++) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drvdata->cfg_head[i]);
+		drvdata->nr_config[i] = 0;

kzalloc() already initialized nr_config.

Ack

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+	}
+
+	memset_io(drvdata->ram_base, 0, drvdata->ram_size);
+
+	drvdata->curr_list = DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST;
+
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 351

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +5 -0
+	ret = dcc_sram_dev_init(drvdata);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err;
+
+	return ret;

We know ret is 0 here, but if you rename "err" to "out" and move it above this line you can reuse return.

Ack

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +16 -0
+err:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int dcc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	dcc_sram_dev_exit(drvdata);
+
+	dcc_config_reset(drvdata);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct qcom_dcc_config sm8150_cfg = {
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 373

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +6 -0
+	.dcc_ram_offset                         = 0x5000,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id dcc_match_table[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dcc", .data = &sm8150_cfg },
+};

MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dcc_match_table);

Ack

Quoted 7 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 376

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +3 -0
+
+static struct platform_driver dcc_driver = {
+	.probe					= dcc_probe,

The indentation here is excessive, feel free to use a single space.

Quoted 5 lines

drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c line 379

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +3 -0
+	.remove					= dcc_remove,
+	.driver					= {
+		.name		= "msm-dcc",

We tend to not use "msm" anymore, so how about "qcom-dcc"?

Ack

Quoted 4 lines

PS. It's hard to comment on some of the things in this patch, as they are not used until the next patch...

Ack. As mentioned above I will be sharing the combined patch in the next version for better clarity.

Quoted 17 lines

Regards,
Bjorn

Quoted 13 lines
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c new file +9 -1
+		.of_match_table	= dcc_match_table,
+	},
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(dcc_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm Technologies Inc. DCC driver");
+
--

QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

Quoted 13 lines · On Thu 11 Mar 04:06 CST 2021, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Replied by Sai

Thanks Souradeep and Sai, I'm definitely interested in learning more about what the hardware block can do and how we can use it.

Regards,
Bjorn

#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 2/6] soc: qcom: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC)

Quoted 19 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 17 lines · On Thu 11 Mar 04:06 CST 2021, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 15 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 9 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA Engine designed to capture and store data during system crash or software triggers. The DCC operates based on link list entries which provides it with data and addresses and the function it needs to perform. These functions are read, write and loop. Added the basic driver in this patch which contains a probe method which instantiates the resources needed by the driver. DCC has it's own SRAM which needs to be instantiated at probe time as well.

So to summarize, the DCC will upon a crash copy the configured region into the dcc-ram, where it can be retrieved either by dumping the memory over USB or from sysfs on the next boot?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Replied by Sai

Thanks Souradeep and Sai, I'm definitely interested in learning more about what the hardware block can do and how we can use it.

Thanks Bjorn, hopefully example in the other thread provides some good view of the capability of DCC. Please let us know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Sai

Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#11 lore raw

PATCH 3/6 soc: qcom: dcc: Add the sysfs variables to the Data Capture and Compare driver(DCC)

In reply to Souradeep Chowdhury

Add the sysfs variables to expose the user space functionalities like DCC enable, disable, configure addresses and software triggers. Also add the necessary methods along with the same.

---
 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c | 1179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 1171 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c +1171 -8
index 89816bf..61e5225 100644
@@ -17,12 +17,30 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
+
+#define TIMEOUT_US		100
+
+#define dcc_writel(drvdata, val, off)					\
+	writel((val), drvdata->base + dcc_offset_conv(drvdata, off))
 #define dcc_readl(drvdata, off)						\
 	readl(drvdata->base + dcc_offset_conv(drvdata, off))
 
+#define dcc_sram_readl(drvdata, off)					\
+	readl(drvdata->ram_base + off)
+
 /* DCC registers */
 #define DCC_HW_INFO			0x04
 #define DCC_LL_NUM_INFO			0x10
+#define DCC_STATUS			0x1C
+#define DCC_LL_LOCK(m)			(0x34 + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_CFG(m)			(0x38 + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_BASE(m)			(0x3c + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_FD_BASE(m)			(0x40 + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_TIMEOUT(m)		(0x44 + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_INT_ENABLE(m)		(0x4C + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_INT_STATUS(m)		(0x50 + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_SW_TRIGGER(m)		(0x60 + 0x80 * m)
+#define DCC_LL_BUS_ACCESS_STATUS(m)	(0x64 + 0x80 * m)
 
 #define DCC_MAP_LEVEL1			0x18
 #define DCC_MAP_LEVEL2			0x34
@@ -36,24 +54,38 @@
 #define DCC_FIX_LOOP_OFFSET		16
 #define DCC_VER_INFO_BIT		9
 
+#define DCC_READ			0
+#define DCC_WRITE			1
+#define DCC_LOOP			2
+#define DCC_READ_WRITE			3
+
+#define MAX_DCC_OFFSET			GENMASK(9, 2)
+#define MAX_DCC_LEN			GENMASK(6, 0)
+#define MAX_LOOP_CNT			GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+#define DCC_ADDR_DESCRIPTOR		0x00
+#define DCC_LOOP_DESCRIPTOR		BIT(30)
+#define DCC_RD_MOD_WR_DESCRIPTOR	BIT(31)
+#define DCC_LINK_DESCRIPTOR		GENMASK(31, 30)
+
+#define DCC_READ_IND			0x00
+#define DCC_WRITE_IND			(BIT(28))
+
+#define DCC_AHB_IND			0x00
+#define DCC_APB_IND			BIT(29)
+
 #define DCC_MAX_LINK_LIST		8
 #define DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST		GENMASK(7, 0)
 
 #define DCC_VER_MASK1			GENMASK(6, 0)
 #define DCC_VER_MASK2			GENMASK(5, 0)
 
-#define DCC_RD_MOD_WR_ADDR		0xC105E
+#define DCC_RD_MOD_WR_ADDR              0xC105E
 
 struct qcom_dcc_config {
 	const int dcc_ram_offset;
 };
 
-enum dcc_mem_map_ver {
-	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1,
-	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2,
-	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER3
-};
-
 enum dcc_descriptor_type {
 	DCC_ADDR_TYPE,
 	DCC_LOOP_TYPE,
@@ -61,6 +93,12 @@ enum dcc_descriptor_type {
 	DCC_WRITE_TYPE
 };
 
+enum dcc_mem_map_ver {
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1,
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER2,
+	DCC_MEM_MAP_VER3
+};
+
 struct dcc_config_entry {
 	u32				base;
 	u32				offset;
@@ -98,6 +136,22 @@ struct dcc_drvdata {
 	u8			loopoff;
 };
 
+struct dcc_cfg_attr {
+	u32	addr;
+	u32	prev_addr;
+	u32	prev_off;
+	u32	link;
+	u32	sram_offset;
+};
+
+struct dcc_cfg_loop_attr {
+	u32	loop;
+	bool	loop_start;
+	u32	loop_cnt;
+	u32	loop_len;
+	u32	loop_off;
+};
+
 static u32 dcc_offset_conv(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, u32 off)
 {
 	if (drvdata->mem_map_ver == DCC_MEM_MAP_VER1) {
@@ -114,6 +168,832 @@ static u32 dcc_offset_conv(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, u32 off)
 	return off;
 }
 
+static int dcc_sram_writel(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata,
+					u32 val, u32 off)
+{
+	if (unlikely(off > (drvdata->ram_size - 4)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	writel((val), drvdata->ram_base + off);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool dcc_ready(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	/* poll until DCC ready */
+	if (!readl_poll_timeout((drvdata->base + DCC_STATUS), val,
+				(FIELD_GET(GENMASK(1, 0), val) == 0), 1, TIMEOUT_US))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static int dcc_read_status(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int curr_list;
+	u32 bus_status;
+	u32 ll_cfg = 0;
+	u32 tmp_ll_cfg = 0;
+
+	for (curr_list = 0; curr_list < drvdata->nr_link_list; curr_list++) {
+		if (!drvdata->enable[curr_list])
+			continue;
+
+		bus_status = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_BUS_ACCESS_STATUS(curr_list));
+
+		if (bus_status) {
+			dev_err(drvdata->dev,
+				"Read access error for list %d err: 0x%x.\n",
+				curr_list, bus_status);
+
+			ll_cfg = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+			tmp_ll_cfg = ll_cfg & ~BIT(9);
+			dcc_writel(drvdata, tmp_ll_cfg, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+			dcc_writel(drvdata, 0x3,
+				DCC_LL_BUS_ACCESS_STATUS(curr_list));
+			dcc_writel(drvdata, ll_cfg, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+			return -ENODATA;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int dcc_sw_trigger(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	int curr_list;
+	u32 ll_cfg = 0;
+	u32 tmp_ll_cfg = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	for (curr_list = 0; curr_list < drvdata->nr_link_list; curr_list++) {
+		if (!drvdata->enable[curr_list])
+			continue;
+		ll_cfg = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+		tmp_ll_cfg = ll_cfg & ~BIT(9);
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, tmp_ll_cfg, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 1, DCC_LL_SW_TRIGGER(curr_list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, ll_cfg, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+	}
+
+	if (!dcc_ready(drvdata)) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev,
+			"DCC is busy after receiving sw tigger.\n");
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = dcc_read_status(drvdata);
+
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void _dcc_ll_cfg_reset_link(struct dcc_cfg_attr *cfg)
+{
+	cfg->addr = 0;
+	cfg->link = 0;
+	cfg->prev_off = 0;
+	cfg->prev_addr = cfg->addr;
+}
+
+static int _dcc_ll_cfg_read_write(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata,
+				  struct dcc_config_entry *entry,
+				  struct dcc_cfg_attr *cfg)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (cfg->link) {
+		/*
+		 * write new offset = 1 to continue
+		 * processing the list
+		 */
+
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->link, cfg->sram_offset);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+		/* Reset link and prev_off */
+		_dcc_ll_cfg_reset_link(cfg);
+	}
+
+	cfg->addr = DCC_RD_MOD_WR_DESCRIPTOR;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->addr, cfg->sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, entry->mask, cfg->sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, entry->write_val, cfg->sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	cfg->addr = 0;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int _dcc_ll_cfg_loop(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, struct dcc_config_entry *entry,
+			    struct dcc_cfg_attr *cfg,
+			    struct dcc_cfg_loop_attr *cfg_loop,
+			    u32 *total_len)
+{
+
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Check if we need to write link of prev entry */
+	if (cfg->link) {
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->link, cfg->sram_offset);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	}
+
+	if (cfg_loop->loop_start) {
+		cfg_loop->loop = (cfg->sram_offset - cfg_loop->loop_off) / 4;
+		cfg_loop->loop |= (cfg_loop->loop_cnt << drvdata->loopoff) &
+		GENMASK(27, drvdata->loopoff);
+		cfg_loop->loop |= DCC_LOOP_DESCRIPTOR;
+		*total_len += (*total_len - cfg_loop->loop_len) * cfg_loop->loop_cnt;
+
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg_loop->loop, cfg->sram_offset);
+
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+
+		cfg_loop->loop_start = false;
+		cfg_loop->loop_len = 0;
+		cfg_loop->loop_off = 0;
+	} else {
+		cfg_loop->loop_start = true;
+		cfg_loop->loop_cnt = entry->loop_cnt - 1;
+		cfg_loop->loop_len = *total_len;
+		cfg_loop->loop_off = cfg->sram_offset;
+	}
+
+	/* Reset link and prev_off */
+
+	_dcc_ll_cfg_reset_link(cfg);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int _dcc_ll_cfg_write(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata,
+			     struct dcc_config_entry *entry,
+			     struct dcc_cfg_attr *cfg,
+			     u32 *total_len)
+{
+	u32 off;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (cfg->link) {
+		/*
+		 * write new offset = 1 to continue
+		 * processing the list
+		 */
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->link, cfg->sram_offset);
+
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+		/* Reset link and prev_off */
+		cfg->addr = 0;
+		cfg->prev_off = 0;
+		cfg->prev_addr = cfg->addr;
+	}
+
+	off = entry->offset/4;
+	/* write new offset-length pair to correct position */
+	cfg->link |= ((off & GENMASK(7, 0)) | BIT(15) | ((entry->len << 8) & GENMASK(14, 8)));
+	cfg->link |= DCC_LINK_DESCRIPTOR;
+
+	/* Address type */
+	cfg->addr = (entry->base >> 4) & GENMASK(27, 0);
+	if (entry->apb_bus)
+		cfg->addr |= DCC_ADDR_DESCRIPTOR | DCC_WRITE_IND | DCC_APB_IND;
+	else
+		cfg->addr |= DCC_ADDR_DESCRIPTOR | DCC_WRITE_IND | DCC_AHB_IND;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->addr, cfg->sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->link, cfg->sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, entry->write_val, cfg->sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+	cfg->addr = 0;
+	cfg->link = 0;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int _dcc_ll_cfg_default(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata,
+			       struct dcc_config_entry *entry,
+			       struct dcc_cfg_attr *cfg,
+			       u32 *pos, u32 *total_len)
+{
+	int ret;
+	u32 off;
+
+	cfg->addr = (entry->base >> 4) & GENMASK(27, 0);
+
+	if (entry->apb_bus)
+		cfg->addr |= DCC_ADDR_DESCRIPTOR | DCC_READ_IND | DCC_APB_IND;
+	else
+		cfg->addr |= DCC_ADDR_DESCRIPTOR | DCC_READ_IND | DCC_AHB_IND;
+
+	off = entry->offset/4;
+	*total_len += entry->len * 4;
+
+	if (!cfg->prev_addr || cfg->prev_addr != cfg->addr || cfg->prev_off > off) {
+		/* Check if we need to write prev link entry */
+		if (cfg->link) {
+			ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->link, cfg->sram_offset);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+		}
+		dev_dbg(drvdata->dev, "DCC: sram address 0x%x\n", cfg->sram_offset);
+
+		/* Write address */
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->addr, cfg->sram_offset);
+
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+
+		/* Reset link and prev_off */
+		cfg->link = 0;
+		cfg->prev_off = 0;
+	}
+
+	if ((off - cfg->prev_off) > 0xFF || entry->len > MAX_DCC_LEN) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: Programming error Base: 0x%x, offset 0x%x\n",
+		entry->base, entry->offset);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (cfg->link) {
+		/*
+		 * link already has one offset-length so new
+		 * offset-length needs to be placed at
+		 * bits [29:15]
+		 */
+		*pos = 15;
+
+		/* Clear bits [31:16] */
+		cfg->link &= GENMASK(14, 0);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * link is empty, so new offset-length needs
+		 * to be placed at bits [15:0]
+		 */
+		*pos = 0;
+		cfg->link = 1 << 15;
+	}
+
+	/* write new offset-length pair to correct position */
+	cfg->link |= (((off-cfg->prev_off) & GENMASK(7, 0)) |
+		     ((entry->len << 8) & GENMASK(14, 8))) << *pos;
+	cfg->link |= DCC_LINK_DESCRIPTOR;
+
+	if (*pos) {
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg->link, cfg->sram_offset);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		cfg->sram_offset += 4;
+		cfg->link = 0;
+	}
+
+	cfg->prev_off  = off + entry->len - 1;
+	cfg->prev_addr = cfg->addr;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int __dcc_ll_cfg(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, int curr_list)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	u32 total_len, pos;
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry;
+	struct dcc_cfg_attr cfg;
+	struct dcc_cfg_loop_attr cfg_loop;
+
+	memset(&cfg, 0, sizeof(cfg));
+	memset(&cfg_loop, 0, sizeof(cfg_loop));
+	cfg.sram_offset = drvdata->ram_cfg * 4;
+	total_len = 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &drvdata->cfg_head[curr_list], list) {
+		switch (entry->desc_type) {
+		case DCC_READ_WRITE_TYPE:
+			ret = _dcc_ll_cfg_read_write(drvdata, entry, &cfg);
+			if (ret)
+				goto overstep;
+			break;
+
+		case DCC_LOOP_TYPE:
+			ret = _dcc_ll_cfg_loop(drvdata, entry, &cfg, &cfg_loop, &total_len);
+			if (ret)
+				goto overstep;
+			break;
+
+		case DCC_WRITE_TYPE:
+			ret = _dcc_ll_cfg_write(drvdata, entry, &cfg, &total_len);
+			if (ret)
+				goto overstep;
+			break;
+
+		default:
+			ret = _dcc_ll_cfg_default(drvdata, entry, &cfg, &pos, &total_len);
+			if (ret)
+				goto overstep;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (cfg.link) {
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg.link, cfg.sram_offset);
+		if (ret)
+			goto overstep;
+		cfg.sram_offset += 4;
+	}
+
+	if (cfg_loop.loop_start) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: Programming error: Loop unterminated\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	/* Handling special case of list ending with a rd_mod_wr */
+	if (cfg.addr == DCC_RD_MOD_WR_DESCRIPTOR) {
+		cfg.addr = (DCC_RD_MOD_WR_ADDR) & GENMASK(27, 0);
+		cfg.addr |= DCC_ADDR_DESCRIPTOR;
+		ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg.addr, cfg.sram_offset);
+		if (ret)
+			goto overstep;
+		cfg.sram_offset += 4;
+	}
+
+	/* Setting zero to indicate end of the list */
+	cfg.link = DCC_LINK_DESCRIPTOR;
+	ret = dcc_sram_writel(drvdata, cfg.link, cfg.sram_offset);
+	if (ret)
+		goto overstep;
+	cfg.sram_offset += 4;
+
+	/* Update ram_cfg and check if the data will overstep */
+	drvdata->ram_cfg = (cfg.sram_offset + total_len) / 4;
+	if (cfg.sram_offset + total_len > drvdata->ram_size) {
+		cfg.sram_offset += total_len;
+		goto overstep;
+	}
+
+	drvdata->ram_start = cfg.sram_offset/4;
+	return 0;
+overstep:
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	memset_io(drvdata->ram_base, 0, drvdata->ram_size);
+	dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC SRAM oversteps, 0x%x (0x%x)\n",
+	cfg.sram_offset, drvdata->ram_size);
+
+err:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int dcc_valid_list(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, int curr_list)
+{
+	u32 lock_reg;
+
+	if (list_empty(&drvdata->cfg_head[curr_list]))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (drvdata->enable[curr_list]) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "List %d is already enabled\n",
+				curr_list);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	lock_reg = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_LOCK(curr_list));
+	if (lock_reg & 0x1) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "List %d is already locked\n",
+				curr_list);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC list passed %d\n", curr_list);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool is_dcc_enabled(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	bool dcc_enable = false;
+	int list;
+
+	for (list = 0; list < DCC_MAX_LINK_LIST; list++) {
+		if (drvdata->enable[list]) {
+			dcc_enable = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return dcc_enable;
+}
+
+static int dcc_enable(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	int list;
+	u32 ram_cfg_base;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	if (!is_dcc_enabled(drvdata)) {
+		memset_io(drvdata->ram_base,
+			0xDE, drvdata->ram_size);
+	}
+
+	for (list = 0; list < drvdata->nr_link_list; list++) {
+
+		if (dcc_valid_list(drvdata, list))
+			continue;
+
+		/* 1. Take ownership of the list */
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, BIT(0), DCC_LL_LOCK(list));
+
+		/* 2. Program linked-list in the SRAM */
+		ram_cfg_base = drvdata->ram_cfg;
+		ret = __dcc_ll_cfg(drvdata, list);
+		if (ret) {
+			dcc_writel(drvdata, 0, DCC_LL_LOCK(list));
+			dev_info(drvdata->dev, "DCC ram programming failed\n");
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		/* 3. program DCC_RAM_CFG reg */
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, ram_cfg_base +
+			drvdata->ram_offset/4, DCC_LL_BASE(list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, drvdata->ram_start +
+			drvdata->ram_offset/4, DCC_FD_BASE(list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 0xFFF, DCC_LL_TIMEOUT(list));
+
+		/* 4. Clears interrupt status register */
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 0, DCC_LL_INT_ENABLE(list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, (BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2)),
+					DCC_LL_INT_STATUS(list));
+
+		dev_info(drvdata->dev, "All values written to enable.\n");
+		/* Make sure all config is written in sram */
+		mb();
+
+		drvdata->enable[list] = true;
+
+		/* 5. Configure trigger */
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, BIT(9), DCC_LL_CFG(list));
+	}
+
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void dcc_disable(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int curr_list;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	if (!dcc_ready(drvdata))
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC is not ready Disabling DCC...\n");
+
+	for (curr_list = 0; curr_list < drvdata->nr_link_list; curr_list++) {
+		if (!drvdata->enable[curr_list])
+			continue;
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 0, DCC_LL_CFG(curr_list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 0, DCC_LL_BASE(curr_list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 0, DCC_FD_BASE(curr_list));
+		dcc_writel(drvdata, 0, DCC_LL_LOCK(curr_list));
+		drvdata->enable[curr_list] = false;
+	}
+	memset_io(drvdata->ram_base, 0, drvdata->ram_size);
+	drvdata->ram_cfg = 0;
+	drvdata->ram_start = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+}
+
+static ssize_t curr_list_show(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	if (drvdata->curr_list == DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST) {
+		dev_err(dev, "curr_list is not set.\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",	drvdata->curr_list);
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t curr_list_store(struct device *dev,
+						struct device_attribute *attr,
+						const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	unsigned long val;
+	u32 lock_reg;
+	bool dcc_enable = false;
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (val >= drvdata->nr_link_list)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	dcc_enable = is_dcc_enabled(drvdata);
+	if (drvdata->curr_list != DCC_INVALID_LINK_LIST	&& dcc_enable) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC is enabled, please disable it first.\n");
+		mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	lock_reg = dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_LL_LOCK(val));
+	if (lock_reg & 0x1) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC linked list is already configured\n");
+		mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	drvdata->curr_list = val;
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	return size;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(curr_list);
+
+
+static ssize_t trigger_store(struct device *dev,
+					struct device_attribute *attr,
+					const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long val;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (val != 1)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = dcc_sw_trigger(drvdata);
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = size;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(trigger);
+
+static ssize_t enable_show(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	int ret;
+	bool dcc_enable = false;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	dcc_enable = is_dcc_enabled(drvdata);
+
+	ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n",
+				(unsigned int)dcc_enable);
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *dev,
+				struct device_attribute *attr,
+				const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long val;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (val)
+		ret = dcc_enable(drvdata);
+	else
+		dcc_disable(drvdata);
+
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = size;
+
+	return ret;
+
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(enable);
+
+static ssize_t config_show(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry;
+	char local_buf[64];
+	int len = 0, count = 0;
+
+	buf[0] = '\0';
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		count = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry(entry,
+	&drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list], list) {
+		switch (entry->desc_type) {
+		case DCC_READ_WRITE_TYPE:
+			len = snprintf(local_buf, 64, "Index: 0x%x, mask: 0x%x, val: 0x%x\n",
+				entry->index, entry->mask, entry->write_val);
+			break;
+		case DCC_LOOP_TYPE:
+			len = snprintf(local_buf, 64, "Index: 0x%x, Loop: %d\n",
+				entry->index, entry->loop_cnt);
+			break;
+		case DCC_WRITE_TYPE:
+			len = snprintf(local_buf, 64,
+				"Write Index: 0x%x, Base: 0x%x, Offset: 0x%x, len: 0x%x APB: %d\n",
+				entry->index, entry->base, entry->offset, entry->len,
+				entry->apb_bus);
+			break;
+		default:
+			len = snprintf(local_buf, 64,
+				"Read Index: 0x%x, Base: 0x%x, Offset: 0x%x, len: 0x%x APB: %d\n",
+				entry->index, entry->base, entry->offset,
+				entry->len, entry->apb_bus);
+		}
+
+		if ((count + len) > PAGE_SIZE) {
+			dev_err(dev, "DCC: Couldn't write complete config\n");
+			break;
+		}
+		strlcat(buf, local_buf, PAGE_SIZE);
+		count += len;
+	}
+
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return count;
+}
+
+static int dcc_config_add(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, unsigned int addr,
+				unsigned int len, int apb_bus)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry, *pentry;
+	unsigned int base, offset;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (!len || len > (drvdata->ram_size / 8)) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: Invalid length\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	base = addr & GENMASK(31, 4);
+
+	if (!list_empty(&drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list])) {
+		pentry = list_last_entry(&drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list],
+			struct dcc_config_entry, list);
+
+		if (pentry->desc_type == DCC_ADDR_TYPE &&
+				addr >= (pentry->base + pentry->offset) &&
+				addr <= (pentry->base +
+					pentry->offset + MAX_DCC_OFFSET)) {
+
+			/* Re-use base address from last entry */
+			base = pentry->base;
+
+			if ((pentry->len * 4 + pentry->base + pentry->offset)
+					== addr) {
+				len += pentry->len;
+
+				if (len > MAX_DCC_LEN)
+					pentry->len = MAX_DCC_LEN;
+				else
+					pentry->len = len;
+
+				addr = pentry->base + pentry->offset +
+					pentry->len * 4;
+				len -= pentry->len;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	offset = addr - base;
+
+	while (len) {
+		entry = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev, sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!entry) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		entry->base = base;
+		entry->offset = offset;
+		entry->len = min_t(u32, len, MAX_DCC_LEN);
+		entry->index = drvdata->nr_config[drvdata->curr_list]++;
+		entry->desc_type = DCC_ADDR_TYPE;
+		entry->apb_bus = apb_bus;
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
+		list_add_tail(&entry->list,
+			&drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list]);
+
+		len -= entry->len;
+		offset += MAX_DCC_LEN * 4;
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return 0;
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t config_store(struct device *dev,
+				struct device_attribute *attr,
+				const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	int ret, len, apb_bus;
+	unsigned int base;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int nval;
+
+	nval = sscanf(buf, "%x %i %d", &base, &len, &apb_bus);
+	if (nval <= 0 || nval > 3)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (nval == 1) {
+		len = 1;
+		apb_bus = 0;
+	} else if (nval == 2) {
+		apb_bus = 0;
+	} else {
+		apb_bus = 1;
+	}
+
+	ret = dcc_config_add(drvdata, base, len, apb_bus);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return size;
+
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(config);
+
 static void dcc_config_reset(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
 {
 	struct dcc_config_entry *entry, *temp;
@@ -135,6 +1015,286 @@ static void dcc_config_reset(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata)
 	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
 }
 
+
+static ssize_t config_reset_store(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr,
+	const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	unsigned long val;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (val)
+		dcc_config_reset(drvdata);
+
+	return size;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(config_reset);
+
+static ssize_t ready_show(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (!drvdata->enable[drvdata->curr_list]) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n",
+			(unsigned int)FIELD_GET(BIT(1), dcc_readl(drvdata, DCC_STATUS)));
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(ready);
+
+static ssize_t interrupt_disable_show(struct device *dev,
+						struct device_attribute *attr,
+						char *buf)
+{
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n",
+				(unsigned int)drvdata->interrupt_disable);
+}
+
+static ssize_t interrupt_disable_store(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr,
+	const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	unsigned long val;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	drvdata->interrupt_disable = (val ? 1:0);
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return size;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(interrupt_disable);
+
+static int dcc_add_loop(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, unsigned long loop_cnt)
+{
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry;
+
+	entry = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev, sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!entry)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	entry->loop_cnt = min_t(u32, loop_cnt, MAX_LOOP_CNT);
+	entry->index = drvdata->nr_config[drvdata->curr_list]++;
+	entry->desc_type = DCC_LOOP_TYPE;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
+	list_add_tail(&entry->list, &drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list]);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t loop_store(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr,
+	const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long loop_cnt;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &loop_cnt)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = dcc_add_loop(drvdata, loop_cnt);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return size;
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(loop);
+
+static int dcc_rd_mod_wr_add(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, unsigned int mask,
+				unsigned int val)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (list_empty(&drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list])) {
+		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "DCC: No read address programmed\n");
+		ret = -EPERM;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	entry = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev, sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!entry) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	entry->desc_type = DCC_READ_WRITE_TYPE;
+	entry->mask = mask;
+	entry->write_val = val;
+	entry->index = drvdata->nr_config[drvdata->curr_list]++;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
+	list_add_tail(&entry->list, &drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list]);
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t rd_mod_wr_store(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr,
+	const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int nval;
+	unsigned int mask, val;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	nval = sscanf(buf, "%x %x", &mask, &val);
+
+	if (nval <= 1 || nval > 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = dcc_rd_mod_wr_add(drvdata, mask, val);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return size;
+
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(rd_mod_wr);
+
+static int dcc_add_write(struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata, unsigned int addr,
+				unsigned int write_val, int apb_bus)
+{
+	struct dcc_config_entry *entry;
+
+	entry = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev, sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!entry)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	entry->desc_type = DCC_WRITE_TYPE;
+	entry->base = addr & GENMASK(31, 4);
+	entry->offset = addr - entry->base;
+	entry->write_val = write_val;
+	entry->index = drvdata->nr_config[drvdata->curr_list]++;
+	entry->len = 1;
+	entry->apb_bus = apb_bus;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
+	list_add_tail(&entry->list, &drvdata->cfg_head[drvdata->curr_list]);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t config_write_store(struct device *dev,
+						struct device_attribute *attr,
+						const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int nval;
+	unsigned int addr, write_val;
+	int apb_bus = 0;
+	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
+
+	nval = sscanf(buf, "%x %x %d", &addr, &write_val, &apb_bus);
+
+	if (nval <= 1 || nval > 3) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (drvdata->curr_list >= drvdata->nr_link_list) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Select link list to program using curr_list\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (nval == 3 && apb_bus != 0)
+		apb_bus = 1;
+
+	ret = dcc_add_write(drvdata, addr, write_val, apb_bus);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return size;
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(config_write);
+
+static const struct device_attribute *dcc_attrs[] = {
+	&dev_attr_trigger,
+	&dev_attr_enable,
+	&dev_attr_config,
+	&dev_attr_config_reset,
+	&dev_attr_ready,
+	&dev_attr_interrupt_disable,
+	&dev_attr_loop,
+	&dev_attr_rd_mod_wr,
+	&dev_attr_curr_list,
+	&dev_attr_config_write,
+	NULL,
+};
+
+static int dcc_create_files(struct device *dev,
+					const struct device_attribute **attrs)
+{
+	int ret = 0, i;
+
+	for (i = 0; attrs[i] != NULL; i++) {
+		ret = device_create_file(dev, attrs[i]);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "DCC: Couldn't create sysfs attribute: %s\n",
+				attrs[i]->attr.name);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int dcc_sram_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	struct dcc_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
@@ -347,6 +1507,9 @@ static int dcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = dcc_sram_dev_init(drvdata);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err;
+	ret = dcc_create_files(dev, dcc_attrs);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err;
 
 	return ret;
 err:
@@ -365,7 +1528,7 @@ static int dcc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct qcom_dcc_config sm8150_cfg = {
-	.dcc_ram_offset                         = 0x5000,
+	.dcc_ram_offset				= 0x5000,
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id dcc_match_table[] = {
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#12 lore raw

PATCH 4/6 DCC: Added the sysfs entries for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver

In reply to Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA engine designed to store register values either in case of a system crash or in case of software triggers manually done by the user. Using DCC hardware and the sysfs interface of the driver the user can exploit various functionalities of DCC. The user can specify the register addresses, the values of which is stored by DCC in it's dedicated SRAM. The register addresses can be used either to read from, write to, first read and store value and then write or to loop. All these options can be exploited using the sysfs interface given to the user. Following are the sysfs interfaces exposed in DCC driver which are documented
1)trigger
2)config
3)config_write
4)config_reset
5)enable
6)rd_mod_wr
7)loop

---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +74 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a855ca
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../trigger
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows the software trigger to be enabled
+		by the user through the sysfs interface.Through this
+		interface the user can manually start a software trigger
+		in dcc where by the dcc driver stores the current status
+		of the specified registers in dcc sram.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../enable
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows the user to manually enable or
+		disable dcc driver.The dcc hardware needs to be
+		enabled before use.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows user to configure the register values
+		along with addresses to the dcc driver.This register
+		addresses are used to read from,write or loop through.
+		To enable all these options separate sysfs files have
+		are created.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config_write
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows user to write a value to the register
+		address given as argument.The values are entered in the
+		form of <register_address> <value>.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config_reset
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to reset the configuration of
+		a dcc driver to the default configuration.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../loop
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to enter the loop count as dcc
+		driver gives the option to loop multiple times on
+		the same register and store the values for each
+		loop.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../rd_mod_wr
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to read the value of the register
+		and then write the value given as an argument to the
+		register address in config.The address argument should
+		be given of the form <mask> <value>.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../ready
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to check the status of the dcc
+		hardware if it's ready to take the inputs.
+
+What:		/sys/bus/platform/devices/.../curr_list
+Date:		February 2021
+Contact:	Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to configure the linkedlist data
+		to be used while configuring addresses.
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#13 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 4/6] DCC: Added the sysfs entries for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver

Quoted 47 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA engine designed to store register values either in case of a system crash or in case of software triggers manually done by the user. Using DCC hardware and the sysfs interface of the driver the user can exploit various functionalities of DCC. The user can specify the register addresses, the values of which is stored by DCC in it's dedicated SRAM. The register addresses can be used either to read from, write to, first read and store value and then write or to loop. All these options can be exploited using the sysfs interface given to the user. Following are the sysfs interfaces exposed in DCC driver which are documented
1)trigger
2)config
3)config_write
4)config_reset
5)enable
6)rd_mod_wr
7)loop

---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +17 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a855ca
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../trigger
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows the software trigger to be enabled
+		by the user through the sysfs interface.Through this
+		interface the user can manually start a software trigger
+		in dcc where by the dcc driver stores the current status
+		of the specified registers in dcc sram.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../enable
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows the user to manually enable or
+		disable dcc driver.The dcc hardware needs to be
+		enabled before use.

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc line 27

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +10 -0
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows user to configure the register values
+		along with addresses to the dcc driver.This register
+		addresses are used to read from,write or loop through.
+		To enable all these options separate sysfs files have
+		are created.

Please describe the expected content of this file.

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc line 35

Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +8 -0
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config_write
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows user to write a value to the register
+		address given as argument.The values are entered in the
+		form of <register_address> <value>.

So it's just a generic 'write some user defined data to some user defined register'? This doesn't sound like the typical way things are exposed in sysfs.

Quoted 29 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +29 -0
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config_reset
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to reset the configuration of
+		a dcc driver to the default configuration.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../loop
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to enter the loop count as dcc
+		driver gives the option to loop multiple times on
+		the same register and store the values for each
+		loop.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../rd_mod_wr
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to read the value of the register
+		and then write the value given as an argument to the
+		register address in config.The address argument should
+		be given of the form <mask> <value>.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../ready
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc line 74

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +10 -0
+Description:
+		This file is used to check the status of the dcc
+		hardware if it's ready to take the inputs.
+
+What:		/sys/bus/platform/devices/.../curr_list
+Date:		February 2021
+Contact:	Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to configure the linkedlist data
+		to be used while configuring addresses.

Please describe the format of this attr. Is it read/write?

Regards,
Bjorn

Quoted 4 lines
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#14 lore raw

Re: [PATCH V1 4/6] DCC: Added the sysfs entries for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver

Quoted 54 lines · Bjorn Andersson
Quoted 52 lines · Souradeep Chowdhury

The DCC is a DMA engine designed to store register values either in case of a system crash or in case of software triggers manually done by the user. Using DCC hardware and the sysfs interface of the driver the user can exploit various functionalities of DCC. The user can specify the register addresses, the values of which is stored by DCC in it's dedicated SRAM. The register addresses can be used either to read from, write to, first read and store value and then write or to loop. All these options can be exploited using the sysfs interface given to the user. Following are the sysfs interfaces exposed in DCC driver which are documented
1)trigger
2)config
3)config_write
4)config_reset
5)enable
6)rd_mod_wr
7)loop

---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc | 74 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +21 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a855ca
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../trigger
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows the software trigger to be enabled
+		by the user through the sysfs interface.Through this
+		interface the user can manually start a software trigger
+		in dcc where by the dcc driver stores the current status
+		of the specified registers in dcc sram.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../enable
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file allows the user to manually enable or
+		disable dcc driver. The dcc hardware needs to be
+		enabled before use.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc line 27

Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +6 -0
+Description:
+		This file allows user to configure the register values
+		along with addresses to the dcc driver.This register
+		addresses are used to read from,write or loop through.
+		To enable all these options separate sysfs files have
+		are created.

Please describe the expected content of this file.

Ack

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +4 -0
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config_write
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc line 35

Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +4 -0
+Description:
+		This file allows user to write a value to the register
+		address given as argument.The values are entered in the
+		form of <register_address> <value>.

So it's just a generic 'write some user defined data to some user defined register'? This doesn't sound like the typical way things are exposed in sysfs.

In certain cases we need to write some values to a register to access the rest of the values from some other registers. To handle such cases DCC can also write to registers on system crash or software triggers if necessary. The same is achieved through this sysfs interface in user space.

Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 34 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +33 -0
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../config_reset
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to reset the configuration of
+		a dcc driver to the default configuration.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../loop
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to enter the loop count as dcc
+		driver gives the option to loop multiple times on
+		the same register and store the values for each
+		loop.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../rd_mod_wr
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to read the value of the register
+		and then write the value given as an argument to the
+		register address in config.The address argument should
+		be given of the form <mask> <value>.
+
+What:           /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../ready
+Date:           February 2021
+Contact:        Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to check the status of the dcc
+		hardware if it's ready to take the inputs.
+
Quoted 8 lines

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc line 74

Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc new file +6 -0
+What:		/sys/bus/platform/devices/.../curr_list
+Date:		February 2021
+Contact:	Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+Description:
+		This file is used to configure the linkedlist data
+		to be used while configuring addresses.

Please describe the format of this attr. Is it read/write?

Ack. This attr is used to select the linked list to be used to configure the addresses. The options given to the user is from 0-3.

Quoted 8 lines

Regards,
Bjorn

Quoted 4 lines

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

#15 lore raw

PATCH 5/6 MAINTAINERS: Add the entry for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver support

In reply to Souradeep Chowdhury

Added the entries for all the files added as a part of driver support for DCC(Data Capture and Compare).

---
 MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +8 -0
index d92f85c..fb28218 100644
@@ -4969,6 +4969,14 @@ F:	include/linux/tfrc.h
 F:	include/uapi/linux/dccp.h
 F:	net/dccp/
 
+QTI DCC DRIVER
+M:	Souradeep Chowdhury <[email protected]>
+L:	[email protected]
+S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc
+F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml
+F:	drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c
+
 DECnet NETWORK LAYER
 L:	[email protected]
 S:	Orphan
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
#16 lore raw

PATCH 6/6 arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add Data Capture and Compare(DCC) support node

In reply to Souradeep Chowdhury

Add the DCC(Data Capture and Compare) device tree node entry along with the addresses for register regions.

---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi +7 -0
index e5bb17b..5c564b1 100644
@@ -654,6 +654,13 @@
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		};
 
+		dcc@10a2000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dcc", "qcom,dcc";
+			reg = <0x0 0x010a2000 0x0 0x1000>,
+			      <0x0 0x010ad000 0x0 0x3000>;
+			reg-names = "dcc-base", "dcc-ram-base";
+		};
+
 		ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,sm8150-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
 				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation