bfq: misc updates
Subsystems (3)
cover bfq: misc updates
From: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Some misc updates, put together mainly to facilitate patch management.
Chunguang Xu (8):
bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method
bfq: convert the type of bfq_group.bfqd to bfq_data*
bfq: limit the IO depth of CLASS_IDLE to 1
bfq: keep the minimun bandwidth for CLASS_BE
bfq: remove unnecessary initialization logic
bfq: optimize the calculation of bfq_weight_to_ioprio()
bfq: reset entity->prio_changed in bfq_init_entity()
bfq: remove unnecessary BFQ_DEFAULT_GRP_IOPRIO
block/bfq-cgroup.c | 13 +++----- block/bfq-iosched.c | 17 +++++++++-- block/bfq-iosched.h | 15 ++++++---- block/bfq-wf2q.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 1/8 bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method
From: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg() to make it easier to obtain the bfq_group corresponding to the entity.
--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 6 ++---- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 + block/bfq-wf2q.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
block/bfq-cgroup.c +2 -4
@@ -309,8 +309,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) {struct bfq_entity *group_entity = bfqq->entity.parent; - return group_entity ? container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, - entity) : +return group_entity ?bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity) : bfqq->bfqd->root_group; }
@@ -610,8 +609,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd,*/ entity = &bfqg->entity;for_each_entity (entity) { -struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =container_of (entity, - struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);if (curr_bfqg != bfqd->root_group) { parent =bfqg_parent (curr_bfqg);if (!parent)
block/bfq-iosched.h +1 -0
@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct bfq_group {#endif struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq (struct bfq_entity *entity); +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity);/* --------------- main algorithm interface ----------------- */
block/bfq-wf2q.c +12 -4
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)if (!group_entity) group_entity = &bfqq->bfqd->root_group->entity; - return container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +return bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity); }/*
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)if (bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity))return true; - bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);/* * The field active_entities does not always contain the
@@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq(struct bfq_entity *entity)return bfqq; } +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity) +{ +struct bfq_group *bfqg =NULL ; + +if (entity->my_sched_data) + bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + +return bfqg; +}/** * bfq_delta - map service into the virtual time domain.
@@ -1001,8 +1010,7 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity)) {/* bfq_group */ -struct bfq_group *bfqg = - container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 2/8 bfq: convert the type of bfq_group.bfqd to bfq_data*
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Setting bfq_group.bfqd to void* type does not seem to make much sense. This will cause unnecessary type conversion. Perhaps it would be better to change it to bfq_data* type.
--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 2 +- block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 +- block/bfq-wf2q.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
block/bfq-cgroup.c +1 -1
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void bfqg_stats_update_io_add(struct bfq_group *bfqg, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, {blkg_rwstat_add (&bfqg->stats.queued, op,1 );bfqg_stats_end_empty_time (&bfqg->stats); -if (!(bfqq == ((struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd)->in_service_queue)) +if (!(bfqq == bfqg->bfqd->in_service_queue))bfqg_stats_set_start_group_wait_time (bfqg,bfqq_group (bfqq)); }
block/bfq-iosched.h +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ struct bfq_group {struct bfq_entity entity;struct bfq_sched_data sched_data; -void *bfqd; +struct bfq_data *bfqd;struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2 ][IOPRIO_BE_NR ];struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq;
block/bfq-wf2q.c +3 -3
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void bfq_active_insert(struct bfq_service_tree *st,#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED sd = entity->sched_data; bfqg = container_of(sd, struct bfq_group, sched_data); - bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd; + bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;#endif if (bfqq)list_add (&bfqq->bfqq_list, &bfqq->bfqd->active_list);
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void bfq_active_extract(struct bfq_service_tree *st,#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED sd = entity->sched_data; bfqg = container_of(sd, struct bfq_group, sched_data); - bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd; + bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;#endif if (bfqq)list_del (&bfqq->bfqq_list);
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ struct bfq_service_tree * else { sd = entity->my_sched_data; bfqg = container_of(sd, struct bfq_group, sched_data); - bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd; + bfqd = bfqg->bfqd; }#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 3/8 bfq: limit the IO depth of CLASS_IDLE to 1
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
The IO depth of queues belong to CLASS_IDLE is limited to 1, so that it can avoid introducing a larger tail latency under a device with a larger IO depth. Although limiting the IO depth may reduce the performance of idle_class, it is generally not a big problem, because idle_class usually does not have strict performance requirements.
--- block/bfq-iosched.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
block/bfq-iosched.c +11 -0
@@ -4808,6 +4808,17 @@ static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)if (!bfqq) goto exit; +/* +* Here, the IO depth of queues belong to CLASS_IDLE is limited +* to 1, so that it can avoid introducing a larger tail latency +* under a device with a larger IO depth. Although limiting the +* IO depth may reduce the performance of idle_class, it is +* generally not a big problem, because idle_class usually +* does not have strict performance requirements. +*/ +if (bfq_class_idle (bfqq) && bfqq->dispatched) + goto exit; + rq =bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq (bfqd, bfqq);if (rq) {
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 4/8 bfq: keep the minimun bandwidth for CLASS_BE
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
CLASS_RT will preempt other classes, which may starve. At present, CLASS_IDLE has alleviated the starvation problem through the minimum bandwidth mechanism. Similarly, we should do the same for CLASS_BE.
--- block/bfq-iosched.c | 6 ++++-- block/bfq-iosched.h | 11 ++++++---- block/bfq-wf2q.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
block/bfq-iosched.c +4 -2
@@ -6537,9 +6537,11 @@ static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group *root_group, root_group->bfqd = bfqd;#endif root_group->rq_pos_tree =RB_ROOT ; -for (i =0 ; i <BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES ; i++) +for (i =0 ; i <BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES ; i++) { root_group->sched_data.service_tree[i] =BFQ_SERVICE_TREE_INIT ; - root_group->sched_data.bfq_class_idle_last_service = jiffies; + root_group->sched_data.bfq_class_last_service[i] = jiffies; + } + root_group->sched_data.class_timeout_last_check = jiffies; }static int bfq_init_queue (struct request_queue *q,struct elevator_type *e)
block/bfq-iosched.h +7 -4
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@#include "blk-cgroup-rwstat.h" #define BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES 3 -#define BFQ_CL_IDLE_TIMEOUT (HZ/5) +#define BFQ_CLASS_TIMEOUT (HZ/5)#define BFQ_MIN_WEIGHT 1#define BFQ_MAX_WEIGHT 1000
@@ -97,9 +97,12 @@ struct bfq_sched_data {struct bfq_entity *next_in_service;/* array of service trees, one per ioprio_class */ struct bfq_service_tree service_tree[BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES ]; -/* last time CLASS_IDLE was served */ -unsigned long bfq_class_idle_last_service; - +/* last time the class was served */ +unsigned long bfq_class_last_service[BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES ]; +/* last time class timeout was checked */ +unsigned long class_timeout_last_check; +/* next index to check class timeout */ +unsigned int next_class_index; };/**
block/bfq-wf2q.c +42 -17
84 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 5/8 bfq: remove unnecessary initialization logic
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Since we will initialize sched_data.service_tree[] in bfq_init_root_group(), bfq_create_group_hierarchy() can ignore this part of the initialization, which can avoid repeated initialization.
--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
block/bfq-cgroup.c +0 -4
@@ -1429,15 +1429,11 @@ void bfqg_and_blkg_put(struct bfq_group *bfqg) {}struct bfq_group *bfq_create_group_hierarchy (struct bfq_data *bfqd,int node) {struct bfq_group *bfqg; -int i; bfqg =kmalloc_node (sizeof (*bfqg),GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, node);if (!bfqg)return NULL ; -for (i =0 ; i <BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES ; i++) - bfqg->sched_data.service_tree[i] =BFQ_SERVICE_TREE_INIT ; -return bfqg; }#endif /* CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED */
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 6/8 bfq: optimize the calculation of bfq_weight_to_ioprio()
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
The value range of ioprio is [0, 7], but the result of bfq_weight_to_ioprio() may exceed this range, so simple optimization is required.
--- block/bfq-wf2q.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
block/bfq-wf2q.c +3 -2
@@ -527,8 +527,9 @@ unsigned short bfq_ioprio_to_weight(int ioprio)*/ static unsigned short bfq_weight_to_ioprio (int weight) { -return max_t (int,0 , -IOPRIO_BE_NR *BFQ_WEIGHT_CONVERSION_COEFF - weight); +int ioprio =IOPRIO_BE_NR - weight /BFQ_WEIGHT_CONVERSION_COEFF ; + +return ioprio <0 ?0 :min_t (int, ioprio,IOPRIO_BE_NR -1 ); }static void bfq_get_entity (struct bfq_entity *entity)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 7/8 bfq: reset entity->prio_changed in bfq_init_entity()
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Since weight, ioprio, ioprio_class will be updated in bfq_init_entity(), st->wsum will be updated in __bfq_activate_entity(), so when it is first active, it seems that __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio() has nothing to do. By resetting entity->prio_change in bfq_init_entity(), we can avoid unnecessary logic calls.
--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
block/bfq-cgroup.c +1 -0
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ void bfq_init_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity, struct bfq_group *bfqg) entity->weight = entity->new_weight; entity->orig_weight = entity->new_weight; + entity->prio_changed =0 ;if (bfqq) { bfqq->ioprio = bfqq->new_ioprio; bfqq->ioprio_class = bfqq->new_ioprio_class;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 8/8 bfq: remove unnecessary BFQ_DEFAULT_GRP_IOPRIO
In reply to brookxuFrom: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
BFQ_DEFAULT_GRP_IOPRIO seems to be unused, maybe we can remove it.
--- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
block/bfq-iosched.h +0 -1
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@#define BFQ_DEFAULT_QUEUE_IOPRIO 4#define BFQ_WEIGHT_LEGACY_DFL 100 -#define BFQ_DEFAULT_GRP_IOPRIO 0#define BFQ_DEFAULT_GRP_CLASS IOPRIO_CLASS_BE#define MAX_PID_STR_LENGTH 12
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20210610072230.TAxxdh-wsL4sihK2TJxF-Gz85ZgsFR7IwOuifnxFi0k@z
Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method
Hello.
Quoted 99 lines · brookxu
From: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Introduce
bfq_entity_to_bfqg()to make it easier to obtain thebfq_groupcorresponding to the entity.Signed-off-by Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 6 ++---- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 + block/bfq-wf2q.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)block/bfq-cgroup.c +2
-4@@ -309,8 +309,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) {struct bfq_entity *group_entity = bfqq->entity.parent; - return group_entity ? container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, - entity) : +return group_entity ?bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity) : bfqq->bfqd->root_group; }@@ -610,8 +609,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd,*/ entity = &bfqg->entity;for_each_entity (entity) { -struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =container_of (entity, - struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);if (curr_bfqg != bfqd->root_group) { parent =bfqg_parent (curr_bfqg);if (!parent)block/bfq-iosched.h +1
-0@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct bfq_group {#endif struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq (struct bfq_entity *entity); +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity);/* --------------- main algorithm interface ----------------- */ block/bfq-wf2q.c +12
-4@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)if (!group_entity) group_entity = &bfqq->bfqd->root_group->entity; - return container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +return bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity); }/* @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)if (bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity))return true; - bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);/* * The field active_entities does not always contain the @@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq(struct bfq_entity *entity)return bfqq; } +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity) +{ +struct bfq_group *bfqg =NULL ; + +if (entity->my_sched_data) + bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + +return bfqg; +}/** * bfq_delta - map service into the virtual time domain. @@ -1001,8 +1010,7 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity)) {/* bfq_group */ -struct bfq_group *bfqg = - container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
If it is a resend only, I can offer my Tested-by since I'm running this series for quite some time already.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method
Oleksandr Natalenko wrote on 2021/6/10 16:31:
Quoted 98 lines
Hello.
Quoted 95 lines · brookxu
From: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Introduce
bfq_entity_to_bfqg()to make it easier to obtain thebfq_groupcorresponding to the entity.Signed-off-by Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 6 ++---- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 + block/bfq-wf2q.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)block/bfq-cgroup.c +2
-4@@ -309,8 +309,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) {struct bfq_entity *group_entity = bfqq->entity.parent; - return group_entity ? container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, - entity) : +return group_entity ?bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity) : bfqq->bfqd->root_group; }@@ -610,8 +609,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd,*/ entity = &bfqg->entity;for_each_entity (entity) { -struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =container_of (entity, - struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);if (curr_bfqg != bfqd->root_group) { parent =bfqg_parent (curr_bfqg);if (!parent)block/bfq-iosched.h +1
-0@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct bfq_group {#endif struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq (struct bfq_entity *entity); +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity);/* --------------- main algorithm interface ----------------- */ block/bfq-wf2q.c +12
-4@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)if (!group_entity) group_entity = &bfqq->bfqd->root_group->entity; - return container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +return bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity); }/* @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)if (bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity))return true; - bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);/* * The field active_entities does not always contain the @@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq(struct bfq_entity *entity)return bfqq; } +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity) +{ +struct bfq_group *bfqg =NULL ; + +if (entity->my_sched_data) + bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + +return bfqg; +}/** * bfq_delta - map service into the virtual time domain. @@ -1001,8 +1010,7 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity)) {/* bfq_group */ -struct bfq_group *bfqg = - container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
block/bfq-wf2q.c +0
-0if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1If it is a resend only, I can offer my Tested-by since I'm running this series for quite some time already.
ok, thank you very much.
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.
Piotr Górski
Tested-byRe: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method
In reply to Oleksandr NatalenkoI have been testing this since the first release and have not noticed any irregularities.
czw., 10 cze 2021 o 10:31 Oleksandr Natalenko
<[email protected]> napisał(a):
Quoted 111 lines
Hello.
Quoted 97 lines · brookxu
From: Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>
Introduce
bfq_entity_to_bfqg()to make it easier to obtain thebfq_groupcorresponding to the entity.Signed-off-by Chunguang Xu <[email protected]>--- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 6 ++---- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 + block/bfq-wf2q.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)block/bfq-cgroup.c +2
-4@@ -309,8 +309,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) {struct bfq_entity *group_entity = bfqq->entity.parent; - return group_entity ? container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, - entity) : +return group_entity ?bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity) : bfqq->bfqd->root_group; }@@ -610,8 +609,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd,*/ entity = &bfqg->entity;for_each_entity (entity) { -struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =container_of (entity, - struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);if (curr_bfqg != bfqd->root_group) { parent =bfqg_parent (curr_bfqg);if (!parent)block/bfq-iosched.h +1
-0@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct bfq_group {#endif struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq (struct bfq_entity *entity); +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity);/* --------------- main algorithm interface ----------------- */ block/bfq-wf2q.c +12
-5@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)if (!group_entity) group_entity = &bfqq->bfqd->root_group->entity; - return container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +return bfq_entity_to_bfqg (group_entity); }/* @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)if (bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity))return true; - bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);/* * The field active_entities does not always contain the @@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq(struct bfq_entity *entity)return bfqq; } +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg (struct bfq_entity *entity) +{ +struct bfq_group *bfqg =NULL ; + +if (entity->my_sched_data) + bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); + +return bfqg; +}/** * bfq_delta - map service into the virtual time domain. @@ -1001,8 +1010,7 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq (entity)) {/* bfq_group */ -struct bfq_group *bfqg = - container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); +struct bfq_group *bfqg =bfq_entity_to_bfqg (entity);struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) { --Quoted 2 lines
1.8.3.1
If it is a resend only, I can offer my Tested-by since I'm running this series for quite some time already.
Thanks.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)