Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Docs: usb: Code and text updates from usb-skeleton

PATCH Superseded Philipp Hortmann 4 participants 10 messages Nov 29, 2021 – Dec 3, 2021

Subsystems (2)

v1 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover Docs: usb: Code and text updates from usb-skeleton

Explanation and example code updates from usb-skeleton

Philipp Hortmann (4):
Docs: usb: update usb_bulk_msg receiving example
Docs: usb: update comment and code near decrement our usage count for
the device
Docs: usb: update comment and code of function skel_delete
Docs: usb: update explanation for device_present to disconnected

 .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 69 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/4 Docs: usb: update usb_bulk_msg receiving example

Clarification that this example is not in the driver template anymore. Update code example so that it fits best to usb-skeleton.c

---
 .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 30 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +15 -15
index b43e1ce49f0e..a9608ad18d77 100644
@@ -218,36 +218,36 @@ do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of
 ``skel_write_bulk_callback`` merely reports if the urb was completed
 successfully or not and then returns.
 
-The read function works a bit differently from the write function in
+This read function works a bit differently from the write function in
 that we do not use an urb to transfer data from the device to the
-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
+driver. Instead we call `usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
 to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg`
+handle urb completion callback functions. We call `usb_bulk_msg`
 function, giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from
 the device and a timeout value. If the timeout period expires without
 receiving any data from the device, the function will fail and return an
 error message. This can be shown with the following code::
 
     /* do an immediate bulk read to get data from the device */
-    retval = usb_bulk_msg (skel->dev,
-			   usb_rcvbulkpipe (skel->dev,
-			   skel->bulk_in_endpointAddr),
-			   skel->bulk_in_buffer,
-			   skel->bulk_in_size,
-			   &count, 5000);
+    rv = usb_bulk_msg(dev->udev,
+		      usb_rcvbulkpipe (dev->udev,
+		      dev->bulk_in_endpointAddr),
+		      dev->bulk_in_buffer,
+	              dev->bulk_in_size,
+		      &len, 5000);
     /* if the read was successful, copy the data to user space */
-    if (!retval) {
-	    if (copy_to_user (buffer, skel->bulk_in_buffer, count))
-		    retval = -EFAULT;
+    if (!rv) {
+	    if (copy_to_user (buffer, dev->bulk_in_buffer, len))
+		    rv = -EFAULT;
 	    else
-		    retval = count;
+		    rv = len;
     }
 
 
-The :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function can be very useful for doing single reads
+Function `usb_bulk_msg` can be very useful for doing single reads
 or writes to a device; however, if you need to read or write constantly to
 a device, it is recommended to set up your own urbs and submit them to
-the USB subsystem.
+the USB subsystem. The template uses urbs for read and write.
 
 When the user program releases the file handle that it has been using to
 talk to the device, the release function in the driver is called. In
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Docs: usb: update usb_bulk_msg receiving example

Quoted 15 lines · Philipp Hortmann

Clarification that this example is not in the driver template anymore. Update code example so that it fits best to usb-skeleton.c

---
 .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 30 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +0 -0
index b43e1ce49f0e..a9608ad18d77 100644
@@ -218,36 +218,36 @@ do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of
 ``skel_write_bulk_callback`` merely reports if the urb was completed
 successfully or not and then returns.

Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of · line 226

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +3 -3
 
-The read function works a bit differently from the write function in
+This read function works a bit differently from the write function in
 that we do not use an urb to transfer data from the device to the
-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
+driver. Instead we call `usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
 to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg`
+handle urb completion callback functions. We call `usb_bulk_msg`
 function, giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from

The reason for the last two changes above isn't clear. You removed some of the markup indicators and made the text ungrammatical. This does not seem like an improvement.

Alan Stern

Quoted 42 lines
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +12 -12
 the device and a timeout value. If the timeout period expires without
 receiving any data from the device, the function will fail and return an
 error message. This can be shown with the following code::
 
     /* do an immediate bulk read to get data from the device */
-    retval = usb_bulk_msg (skel->dev,
-			   usb_rcvbulkpipe (skel->dev,
-			   skel->bulk_in_endpointAddr),
-			   skel->bulk_in_buffer,
-			   skel->bulk_in_size,
-			   &count, 5000);
+    rv = usb_bulk_msg(dev->udev,
+		      usb_rcvbulkpipe (dev->udev,
+		      dev->bulk_in_endpointAddr),
+		      dev->bulk_in_buffer,
+	              dev->bulk_in_size,
+		      &len, 5000);
     /* if the read was successful, copy the data to user space */
-    if (!retval) {
-	    if (copy_to_user (buffer, skel->bulk_in_buffer, count))
-		    retval = -EFAULT;
+    if (!rv) {
+	    if (copy_to_user (buffer, dev->bulk_in_buffer, len))
+		    rv = -EFAULT;
 	    else
-		    retval = count;
+		    rv = len;
     }
 
 
-The :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function can be very useful for doing single reads
+Function `usb_bulk_msg` can be very useful for doing single reads
 or writes to a device; however, if you need to read or write constantly to
 a device, it is recommended to set up your own urbs and submit them to
-the USB subsystem.
+the USB subsystem. The template uses urbs for read and write.
 
 When the user program releases the file handle that it has been using to
 talk to the device, the release function in the driver is called. In
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Docs: usb: update usb_bulk_msg receiving example

Quoted 31 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 15 lines · Philipp Hortmann

Clarification that this example is not in the driver template anymore. Update code example so that it fits best to usb-skeleton.c

---
  .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 30 +++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +0 -0
index b43e1ce49f0e..a9608ad18d77 100644
@@ -218,36 +218,36 @@ do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of
  ``skel_write_bulk_callback`` merely reports if the urb was completed
  successfully or not and then returns.

Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of · line 226

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +3 -3
 
-The read function works a bit differently from the write function in
+This read function works a bit differently from the write function in
  that we do not use an urb to transfer data from the device to the
-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
+driver. Instead we call `usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
  to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg`
+handle urb completion callback functions. We call `usb_bulk_msg`
  function, giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from

The reason for the last two changes above isn't clear. You removed some of the markup indicators and made the text ungrammatical. This does not seem like an improvement.

Quoted 2 lines

Alan Stern

This two changes were made because of an earlier comment to the same document, but may be I understood this wrong:
On 10/19/21 11:17 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
...
We shouldn't be using :c:func: anymore; just say usb_register() and the
right things will happen. Definitely worth fixing while you are in the
neighborhood.
...
If you're making this change, take out "the" (as well as :c:func:).
...
___
Please find the full email under the link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/[email protected]/T/

Please give me an example for the right wording. I am not a native English speaker. Is the article in this case required? Thanks for your support.
Philipp Hortmann

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Docs: usb: update usb_bulk_msg receiving example

Quoted 47 lines · Philipp Hortmann
Quoted 30 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 14 lines · Philipp Hortmann

Clarification that this example is not in the driver template anymore. Update code example so that it fits best to usb-skeleton.c

---
  .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 30 +++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +0 -0
index b43e1ce49f0e..a9608ad18d77 100644
@@ -218,36 +218,36 @@ do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of
  ``skel_write_bulk_callback`` merely reports if the urb was completed

Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of · line 225

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +3 -3
  successfully or not and then returns.
-The read function works a bit differently from the write function in
+This read function works a bit differently from the write function in
  that we do not use an urb to transfer data from the device to the
-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
+driver. Instead we call `usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
  to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg`
+handle urb completion callback functions. We call `usb_bulk_msg`
  function, giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from

The reason for the last two changes above isn't clear. You removed some of the markup indicators and made the text ungrammatical. This does not seem like an improvement.

Quoted 2 lines

Alan Stern

This two changes were made because of an earlier comment to the same document, but may be I understood this wrong:
On 10/19/21 11:17 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
...
We shouldn't be using :c:func: anymore; just say usb_register() and the right things will happen. Definitely worth fixing while you are in the neighborhood.
...
If you're making this change, take out "the" (as well as :c:func:).
...
___
Please find the full email under the link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/[email protected]/T/

Quoted 2 lines

Please give me an example for the right wording. I am not a native English speaker. Is the article in this case required?

Okay, now I see what's going on. You should change it like this:

-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:usb_bulk_msg function, which can be used +driver. Instead we call usb_bulk_msg, which can be used
to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:usb_bulk_msg +handle urb completion callback functions. We call usb_bulk_msg,
giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from

Alan Stern

#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Docs: usb: update usb_bulk_msg receiving example

Hi,

Quoted 1 line · Alan Stern

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:49:47AM +0100, Philipp Hortmann wrote:

[...]

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Please find the full email under the link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/[email protected]/T/

Please give me an example for the right wording. I am not a native English speaker. Is the article in this case required?

Okay, now I see what's going on. You should change it like this:

Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst do very much processing at that time. Our implementation of

Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +2 -2
-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg` function, which can be used
+driver. Instead we call `usb_bulk_msg`, which can be used
 to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:`usb_bulk_msg`
+handle urb completion callback functions. We call `usb_bulk_msg`,
 giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from

Well, for function names to be caught by kernel-doc tools, you need to say usb_bulk_msg() (without ``, with () appended).

So, the diff should look:

-driver. Instead we call the :c:func:usb_bulk_msg function, which can be used +driver. Instead we call usb_bulk_msg(), which can be used
to send or receive data from a device without having to create urbs and
-handle urb completion callback functions. We call the :c:func:usb_bulk_msg +handle urb completion callback functions. We call usb_bulk_msg(),
giving it a buffer into which to place any data received from

You can find related documentation at:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#cross-referencing-from-restructuredtext

Thanks, Akira

Quoted 2 lines

Alan Stern

#6 lore raw

PATCH 2/4 Docs: usb: update comment and code near decrement our usage count for the device

In reply to Philipp Hortmann

Put release function in the document typical form
Update comment: decrement our usage count ..
and code according to usb-skeleton.c

---
 Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +3 -3
index a9608ad18d77..b16e4e76d472 100644
@@ -250,12 +250,12 @@ a device, it is recommended to set up your own urbs and submit them to
 the USB subsystem. The template uses urbs for read and write.
 
 When the user program releases the file handle that it has been using to
-talk to the device, the release function in the driver is called. In
+talk to the device, the `skel_release` function in the driver is called. In
 this function we decrement our private usage count and wait for possible
 pending writes::
 
-    /* decrement our usage count for the device */
-    --skel->open_count;
+    /* decrement the count on our device */
+    kref_put(&dev->kref, skel_delete);
 
 
 One of the more difficult problems that USB drivers must be able to
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#7 lore raw

PATCH 3/4 Docs: usb: update comment and code of function skel_delete

In reply to Philipp Hortmann

Put skel_delete function in the document typical form Update code according to usb-skeleton.c

---
 .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +9 -10
index b16e4e76d472..74bb72a2f0ac 100644
@@ -263,18 +263,17 @@ handle smoothly is the fact that the USB device may be removed from the
 system at any point in time, even if a program is currently talking to
 it. It needs to be able to shut down any current reads and writes and
 notify the user-space programs that the device is no longer there. The
-following code (function ``skel_delete``) is an example of how to do
-this::
+`skel_delete` function is an example of how to do this::
 
-    static inline void skel_delete (struct usb_skel *dev)
+    static void skel_delete(struct kref *kref)
     {
-	kfree (dev->bulk_in_buffer);
-	if (dev->bulk_out_buffer != NULL)
-	    usb_free_coherent (dev->udev, dev->bulk_out_size,
-		dev->bulk_out_buffer,
-		dev->write_urb->transfer_dma);
-	usb_free_urb (dev->write_urb);
-	kfree (dev);
+	struct usb_skel *dev = to_skel_dev(kref);
+
+	usb_free_urb(dev->bulk_in_urb);
+	usb_put_intf(dev->interface);
+	usb_put_dev(dev->udev);
+	kfree(dev->bulk_in_buffer);
+	kfree(dev);
     }
 
 
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
maintainer
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Docs: usb: update comment and code of function skel_delete

Quoted 13 lines · Philipp Hortmann

Put skel_delete function in the document typical form Update code according to usb-skeleton.c

---
 .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst     | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +0 -0
index b16e4e76d472..74bb72a2f0ac 100644

Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst handle smoothly is the fact that the USB device may be removed from the · line 266

Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +1 -2
@@ -263,18 +263,17 @@ handle smoothly is the fact that the USB device may be removed from the
 system at any point in time, even if a program is currently talking to
 it. It needs to be able to shut down any current reads and writes and
 notify the user-space programs that the device is no longer there. The
-following code (function ``skel_delete``) is an example of how to do
-this::
+`skel_delete` function is an example of how to do this::

As pointed out elsewhere this should be:

skel_delete() is an example of how to do this::

thanks,

greg k-h

#9 lore raw

PATCH 4/4 Docs: usb: update explanation for device_present to disconnected

In reply to Philipp Hortmann

Update text for device_present flag to disconnected flag

---
 .../driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst          | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Documentation/driver-api/usb/writing_usb_driver.rst +6 -8
index 74bb72a2f0ac..d398d2155cd3 100644
@@ -277,15 +277,13 @@ notify the user-space programs that the device is no longer there. The
     }
 
 
-If a program currently has an open handle to the device, we reset the
-flag ``device_present``. For every read, write, release and other
+If the driver probed the device successfully, the flag ``disconnected``
+is initialized and set to false. For every read, write and other
 functions that expect a device to be present, the driver first checks
-this flag to see if the device is still present. If not, it releases
-that the device has disappeared, and a ``-ENODEV`` error is returned to the
-user-space program. When the release function is eventually called, it
-determines if there is no device and if not, it does the cleanup that
-the ``skel_disconnect`` function normally does if there are no open files
-on the device (see Listing 5).
+this flag to see if the device is still present. If not, a ``-ENODEV``
+error is returned to the user-space program. When the device is
+disconnected, `skel_disconnected` function is called. It sets ``disconnected``
+to true and cleans up.
 
 Isochronous Data
 ================
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1