net/smc: Optimizing performance in short-lived scenarios
Subsystems (7)
D. Wythe
maintainerv7 cover net/smc: Optimizing performance in short-lived scenarios
From: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
This patch set aims to optimizing performance of SMC in short-lived links scenarios, which is quite unsatisfactory right now.
In our benchmark, we test it with follow scripts:
./wrk -c 10000 -t 4 -H 'Connection: Close' -d 20 http://smc-server
Current performance figures like that:
Running 20s test @ http://11.213.45.6
4 threads and 10000 connections
4956 requests in 20.06s, 3.24MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 672, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 247.07 Transfer/sec: 165.28KB
There are many reasons for this phenomenon, this patch set doesn't solve it all though, but it can be well alleviated with it in.
Patch 1/5 (Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent) :
Separate smc_tcp_listen_work() from smc_listen_work(), make them independent of each other, the busy SMC handshake can not affect new TCP connections visit any more. Avoid discarding a large number of TCP connections after being overstock, which is undoubtedly raise the connection establishment time.
Patch 2/5 (Limit SMC backlog connections):
Since patch 1 has separated smc_tcp_listen_work() from smc_listen_work(), an unrestricted TCP accept have come into being. This patch try to put a limit on SMC backlog connections refers to implementation of TCP.
Patch 3/5 (Limit SMC visits when handshake workqueue congested):
Considering the complexity of SMC handshake right now, in short-lived links scenarios, this may not be the main scenario of SMC though, it's performance is still quite poor. This patch try to provide constraint on SMC handshake when handshake workqueue congested, which is the sign of SMC handshake stacking in our opinion.
Patch 4/5 (Dynamic control handshake limitation by socket options)
This patch allow applications dynamically control the ability of SMC handshake limitation. Since SMC don't support set SMC socket option before,
this patch also have to support SMC's owns socket options.
Patch 5/5 (Add global configure for handshake limitation by netlink)
This patch provides a way to get benefit of handshake limitation without
modifying any code for applications, which is quite useful for most existing applications.
After this patch set, performance figures like that:
Running 20s test @ http://11.213.45.6
4 threads and 10000 connections
693253 requests in 20.10s, 452.88MB read
Requests/sec: 34488.13 Transfer/sec: 22.53MB
That's a quite well performance improvement, about to 6 to 7 times in my environment.
---
changelog:
v1 -> v2:
- fix compile warning
- fix invalid dependencies in kconfig
v2 -> v3:
- correct spelling mistakes
- fix useless variable declare
v3 -> v4
- make smc_tcp_ls_wq be static
v4 -> v5
- add dynamic control for SMC auto fallback by socket options
- add global configure for SMC auto fallback through netlink v5 -> v6
- move auto fallback to net namespace scope
- remove auto fallback attribute in SMC_GEN_SYS_INFO
- add independent attributes for auto fallback
v6 -> v7
- fix wording and the naming issues, rename 'auto fallback' to handshake limitation.
---
D. Wythe (5):
net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent net/smc: Limit backlog connections
net/smc: Limit SMC visits when handshake workqueue congested net/smc: Dynamic control handshake limitation by socket options net/smc: Add global configure for handshake limitation by netlink
include/linux/socket.h | 1 + include/linux/tcp.h | 1 + include/net/netns/smc.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/smc.h | 15 ++++ net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 +- net/smc/af_smc.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- net/smc/smc.h | 13 +++- net/smc/smc_netlink.c | 15 ++++ net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 3 + 9 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
D. Wythe
maintainerPATCH v7 1/5 net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent
From: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
In multithread and 10K connections benchmark, the backend TCP connection established very slowly, and lots of TCP connections stay in SYN_SENT state.
Client: smc_run wrk -c 10000 -t 4 http://server
the netstate of server host shows like:
145042 times the listen queue of a socket overflowed 145042 SYNs to LISTEN sockets dropped
One reason of this issue is that, since the smc_tcp_listen_work() shared the same workqueue (smc_hs_wq) with smc_listen_work(), while the smc_listen_work() do blocking wait for smc connection established. Once the workqueue became congested, it's will block the accept() from TCP listen.
This patch creates a independent workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq) for smc_tcp_listen_work(), separate it from smc_listen_work(), which is quite acceptable considering that smc_tcp_listen_work() runs very fast.
--- net/smc/af_smc.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
net/smc/af_smc.c +11 -2
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@* creation on client */ +static struct workqueue_struct *smc_tcp_ls_wq;/* wq for tcp listen work */ struct workqueue_struct *smc_hs_wq;/* wq for handshake work */ struct workqueue_struct *smc_close_wq;/* wq for close work */
@@ -2227,7 +2228,7 @@ static void smc_clcsock_data_ready(struct sock *listen_clcsock) lsmc->clcsk_data_ready (listen_clcsock);if (lsmc->sk.sk_state ==SMC_LISTEN ) {sock_hold (&lsmc->sk);/* sock_put in smc_tcp_listen_work() */ -if (!queue_work (smc_hs_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work)) +if (!queue_work (smc_tcp_ls_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work))sock_put (&lsmc->sk); } }
@@ -3024,9 +3025,14 @@ static int __init smc_init(void) goto out_nl; rc = -ENOMEM ; + + smc_tcp_ls_wq =alloc_workqueue ("smc_tcp_ls_wq" ,0 ,0 ); +if (!smc_tcp_ls_wq) + goto out_pnet; + smc_hs_wq =alloc_workqueue ("smc_hs_wq" ,0 ,0 );if (!smc_hs_wq) - goto out_pnet; + goto out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq; smc_close_wq =alloc_workqueue ("smc_close_wq" ,0 ,0 );if (!smc_close_wq)
@@ -3097,6 +3103,8 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)destroy_workqueue (smc_close_wq); out_alloc_hs_wq:destroy_workqueue (smc_hs_wq); +out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq: +destroy_workqueue (smc_tcp_ls_wq); out_pnet:smc_pnet_exit (); out_nl:
@@ -3115,6 +3123,7 @@ static void __exit smc_exit(void)smc_core_exit ();smc_ib_unregister_client ();destroy_workqueue (smc_close_wq); +destroy_workqueue (smc_tcp_ls_wq);destroy_workqueue (smc_hs_wq);proto_unregister (&smc_proto6);proto_unregister (&smc_proto);
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
D. Wythe
maintainerPATCH v7 2/5 net/smc: Limit backlog connections
In reply to D. WytheFrom: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
Current implementation does not handling backlog semantics, one potential risk is that server will be flooded by infinite amount connections, even if client was SMC-incapable.
This patch works to put a limit on backlog connections, referring to the TCP implementation, we divides SMC connections into two categories:
1. Half SMC connection, which includes all TCP established while SMC not connections.
2. Full SMC connection, which includes all SMC established connections.
For half SMC connection, since all half SMC connections starts with TCP established, we can achieve our goal by put a limit before TCP established. Refer to the implementation of TCP, this limits will based on not only the half SMC connections but also the full connections, which is also a constraint on full SMC connections.
For full SMC connections, although we know exactly where it starts, it's quite hard to put a limit before it. The easiest way is to block wait before receive SMC confirm CLC message, while it's under protection by smc_server_lgr_pending, a global lock, which leads this limit to the entire host instead of a single listen socket. Another way is to drop the full connections, but considering the cast of SMC connections, we prefer to keep full SMC connections.
Even so, the limits of full SMC connections still exists, see commits about half SMC connection below.
After this patch, the limits of backend connection shows like:
For SMC:
1. Client with SMC-capability can makes 2 * backlog full SMC connections or 1 * backlog half SMC connections and 1 * backlog full SMC connections at most.
2. Client without SMC-capability can only makes 1 * backlog half TCP connections and 1 * backlog full TCP connections.
--- net/smc/af_smc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/smc/smc.h | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/smc/af_smc.c +45 -0
@@ -73,6 +73,36 @@ static void smc_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk, int val) smc->clcsock->sk->sk_prot->keepalive (smc->clcsock->sk, val); } +static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock (const struct sock *sk, +struct sk_buff *skb, +struct request_sock *req, +struct dst_entry *dst, +struct request_sock *req_unhash, +bool *own_req) +{ +struct smc_sock *smc; + + smc =smc_clcsock_user_data (sk); + +if (READ_ONCE (sk->sk_ack_backlog) +atomic_read (&smc->queued_smc_hs) > + sk->sk_max_ack_backlog) + goto drop; + +if (sk_acceptq_is_full (&smc->sk)) { +NET_INC_STATS (sock_net (sk),LINUX_MIB_LISTENOVERFLOWS ); + goto drop; + } + +/* passthrough to original syn recv sock fct */ +return smc->ori_af_ops->syn_recv_sock (sk, skb, req, dst, req_unhash, + own_req); + +drop: +dst_release (dst); +tcp_listendrop (sk); +return NULL ; +} +static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = { .lock =__RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (smc_v4_hashinfo.lock), };
@@ -1595,6 +1625,9 @@ static void smc_listen_out(struct smc_sock *new_smc)struct smc_sock *lsmc = new_smc->listen_smc;struct sock *newsmcsk = &new_smc->sk; +if (tcp_sk (new_smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc) +atomic_dec (&lsmc->queued_smc_hs); +if (lsmc->sk.sk_state ==SMC_LISTEN ) {lock_sock_nested (&lsmc->sk,SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING );smc_accept_enqueue (&lsmc->sk, newsmcsk);
@@ -2200,6 +2233,9 @@ static void smc_tcp_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)if (!new_smc)continue ; +if (tcp_sk (new_smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc) +atomic_inc (&lsmc->queued_smc_hs); + new_smc->listen_smc = lsmc; new_smc->use_fallback = lsmc->use_fallback; new_smc->fallback_rsn = lsmc->fallback_rsn;
@@ -2266,6 +2302,15 @@ static int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog) smc->clcsock->sk->sk_data_ready = smc_clcsock_data_ready; smc->clcsock->sk->sk_user_data = (void *)((uintptr_t )smc |SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY ); + +/* save original ops */ + smc->ori_af_ops =inet_csk (smc->clcsock->sk)->icsk_af_ops; + + smc->af_ops = *smc->ori_af_ops; + smc->af_ops.syn_recv_sock = smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock; + +inet_csk (smc->clcsock->sk)->icsk_af_ops = &smc->af_ops; + rc =kernel_listen (smc->clcsock, backlog);if (rc) { smc->clcsock->sk->sk_data_ready = smc->clcsk_data_ready;
net/smc/smc.h +5 -1
@@ -252,6 +252,10 @@ struct smc_sock { /* smc sock container */bool use_fallback;/* fallback to tcp */ int fallback_rsn;/* reason for fallback */ u32 peer_diagnosis;/* decline reason from peer */ +atomic_t queued_smc_hs;/* queued smc handshakes */ +struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops af_ops; +const struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops *ori_af_ops; +/* original af ops */ int sockopt_defer_accept;/* sockopt TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT * value
@@ -276,7 +280,7 @@ static inline struct smc_sock *smc_sk(const struct sock *sk)return (struct smc_sock *)sk; } -static inline struct smc_sock *smc_clcsock_user_data (struct sock *clcsk) +static inline struct smc_sock *smc_clcsock_user_data (const struct sock *clcsk) {return (struct smc_sock *) ((uintptr_t )clcsk->sk_user_data & ~SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY );
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
D. Wythe
maintainerPATCH v7 3/5 net/smc: Limit SMC visits when handshake workqueue congested
In reply to D. WytheFrom: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
This patch intends to provide a mechanism to put constraint on SMC connections visit according to the pressure of SMC handshake process. At present, frequent visits will cause the incoming connections to be backlogged in SMC handshake queue, raise the connections established time. Which is quite unacceptable for those applications who base on short lived connections.
There are two ways to implement this mechanism:
1. Put limitation after TCP established.
2. Put limitation before TCP established.
In the first way, we need to wait and receive CLC messages that the client will potentially send, and then actively reply with a decline message, in a sense, which is also a sort of SMC handshake, affect the connections established time on its way.
In the second way, the only problem is that we need to inject SMC logic into TCP when it is about to reply the incoming SYN, since we already do that, it's seems not a problem anymore. And advantage is obvious, few additional processes are required to complete the constraint.
This patch use the second way. After this patch, connections who beyond constraint will not informed any SMC indication, and SMC will not be involved in any of its subsequent processes.
--- include/linux/tcp.h | 1 + net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 ++- net/smc/af_smc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/tcp.h +1 -0
@@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ struct tcp_sock {bool is_mptcp;#endif #if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMC ) +bool (*smc_hs_congested)(const struct sock *sk);bool syn_smc;/* SYN includes SMC */ #endif
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +2 -1
@@ -6703,7 +6703,8 @@ static void tcp_openreq_init(struct request_sock *req, ireq->ir_num =ntohs (tcp_hdr (skb)->dest); ireq->ir_mark =inet_request_mark (sk, skb);#if IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_SMC ) - ireq->smc_ok = rx_opt->smc_ok; + ireq->smc_ok = rx_opt->smc_ok && !(tcp_sk (sk)->smc_hs_congested && +tcp_sk (sk)->smc_hs_congested (sk));#endif }
net/smc/af_smc.c +17 -0
@@ -103,6 +103,21 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,return NULL ; } +static bool smc_hs_congested (const struct sock *sk) +{ +const struct smc_sock *smc; + + smc =smc_clcsock_user_data (sk); + +if (!smc) +return true; + +if (workqueue_congested (WORK_CPU_UNBOUND , smc_hs_wq)) +return true; + +return false; +} +static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = { .lock =__RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (smc_v4_hashinfo.lock), };
@@ -2311,6 +2326,8 @@ static int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)inet_csk (smc->clcsock->sk)->icsk_af_ops = &smc->af_ops; +tcp_sk (smc->clcsock->sk)->smc_hs_congested = smc_hs_congested; + rc =kernel_listen (smc->clcsock, backlog);if (rc) { smc->clcsock->sk->sk_data_ready = smc->clcsk_data_ready;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
D. Wythe
maintainerPATCH v7 4/5 net/smc: Dynamic control handshake limitation by socket options
In reply to D. WytheFrom: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
This patch aims to add dynamic control for SMC handshake limitation for every smc sockets, in production environment, it is possible for the same applications to handle different service types, and may have different opinion on SMC handshake limitation.
This patch try socket options to complete it, since we don't have socket option level for SMC yet, which requires us to implement it at the same time.
This patch does the following:
- add new socket option level: SOL_SMC.
- add new SMC socket option: SMC_LIMIT_HS.
- provide getter/setter for SMC socket options.
--- include/linux/socket.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/smc.h | 4 +++ net/smc/af_smc.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- net/smc/smc.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/socket.h +1 -0
@@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ struct ucred {#define SOL_XDP 283#define SOL_MPTCP 284#define SOL_MCTP 285 +#define SOL_SMC 286/* IPX options */ #define IPX_TYPE 1
include/uapi/linux/smc.h +4 -0
@@ -284,4 +284,8 @@ enum { __SMC_NLA_SEID_TABLE_MAX,SMC_NLA_SEID_TABLE_MAX = __SMC_NLA_SEID_TABLE_MAX -1 }; + +/* SMC socket options */ +#define SMC_LIMIT_HS 1/* constraint on smc handshake */ +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_SMC_H */
net/smc/af_smc.c +68 -1
93 lines not on this page · raw message
net/smc/smc.h +1 -0
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct smc_sock { /* smc sock container */struct work_struct smc_listen_work;/* prepare new accept socket */ struct list_head accept_q;/* sockets to be accepted */ spinlock_t accept_q_lock;/* protects accept_q */ +bool limit_smc_hs;/* put constraint on handshake */ bool use_fallback;/* fallback to tcp */ int fallback_rsn;/* reason for fallback */ u32 peer_diagnosis;/* decline reason from peer */
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
D. Wythe
maintainerPATCH v7 5/5 net/smc: Add global configure for handshake limitation by netlink
In reply to D. WytheFrom: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
Although we can control SMC handshake limitation through socket options, which means that applications who need it must modify their code. It's quite troublesome for many existing applications. This patch modifies the global default value of SMC handshake limitation through netlink, providing a way to put constraint on handshake without modifies any code for applications.
--- include/net/netns/smc.h | 2 ++ include/uapi/linux/smc.h | 11 +++++++++++ net/smc/af_smc.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/smc/smc.h | 6 ++++++ net/smc/smc_netlink.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 3 +++ 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
include/net/netns/smc.h +2 -0
@@ -12,5 +12,7 @@ struct netns_smc {/* protect fback_rsn */ struct mutex mutex_fback_rsn;struct smc_stats_rsn *fback_rsn; + + bool limit_smc_hs; /* constraint on handshake */ };#endif
include/uapi/linux/smc.h +11 -0
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ enum {SMC_NETLINK_DUMP_SEID ,SMC_NETLINK_ENABLE_SEID ,SMC_NETLINK_DISABLE_SEID , +SMC_NETLINK_DUMP_HS_LIMITATION , +SMC_NETLINK_ENABLE_HS_LIMITATION , + SMC_NETLINK_DISABLE_HS_LIMITATION, };/* SMC_GENL_FAMILY top level attributes */
@@ -285,6 +288,14 @@ enum { SMC_NLA_SEID_TABLE_MAX = __SMC_NLA_SEID_TABLE_MAX - 1 }; +/* SMC_NETLINK_HS_LIMITATION attributes */ +enum { +SMC_NLA_HS_LIMITATION_UNSPEC , +SMC_NLA_HS_LIMITATION_ENABLED ,/* u8 */ + __SMC_NLA_HS_LIMITATION_MAX, +SMC_NLA_HS_LIMITATION_MAX = __SMC_NLA_HS_LIMITATION_MAX -1 +}; +/* SMC socket options */ #define SMC_LIMIT_HS 1/* constraint on smc handshake */
net/smc/af_smc.c +42 -0
54 lines not on this page · raw message
net/smc/smc.h +6 -0
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@#include <linux/socket.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <linux/compiler.h> /* __aligned */ +#include <net/genetlink.h> #include <net/sock.h> #include "smc_ib.h"
@@ -336,4 +337,9 @@ void smc_fill_gid_list(struct smc_link_group *lgr,struct smc_gidlist *gidlist, struct smc_ib_device *known_dev, u8 *known_gid); +/* smc handshake limitation interface for netlink */ +int smc_nl_dump_hs_limitation (struct sk_buff *skb,struct netlink_callback *cb); +int smc_nl_enable_hs_limitation (struct sk_buff *skb,struct genl_info *info); +int smc_nl_disable_hs_limitation (struct sk_buff *skb,struct genl_info *info); +#endif /* __SMC_H */
net/smc/smc_netlink.c +15 -0
@@ -111,6 +111,21 @@ .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM, .doit = smc_nl_disable_seid, }, + { + .cmd = SMC_NETLINK_DUMP_HS_LIMITATION, + /* can be retrieved by unprivileged users */ + .dumpit = smc_nl_dump_hs_limitation, + }, + { + .cmd = SMC_NETLINK_ENABLE_HS_LIMITATION, + .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM, + .doit = smc_nl_enable_hs_limitation, + }, + { + .cmd = SMC_NETLINK_DISABLE_HS_LIMITATION, + .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM, + .doit = smc_nl_disable_hs_limitation, + }, }; static const struct nla_policy smc_gen_nl_policy[2] = {
net/smc/smc_pnet.c +3 -0
@@ -868,6 +868,9 @@ int smc_pnet_net_init(struct net *net)smc_pnet_create_pnetids_list (net); +/* disable handshake limitation by default */ + net->smc.limit_smc_hs =0 ; +return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/5] net/smc: Add global configure for handshake limitation by netlink
Quoted 11 lines · D. Wythe
From: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
Although we can control SMC handshake limitation through socket options, which means that applications who need it must modify their code. It's quite troublesome for many existing applications. This patch modifies the global default value of SMC handshake limitation through netlink, providing a way to put constraint on handshake without modifies any code for applications.
Suggested-by Tony Lu <[email protected]>Signed-off-by D. Wythe <[email protected]>
This patch looks good to me. This patch set starts to solve the problem that the SMC connection performance is not good enough.
Thank you,
Tony Lu
Quoted 4 lines · D. Wythe
From: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
This patch set aims to optimizing performance of SMC in short-lived links scenarios, which is quite unsatisfactory right now.
This series looks good to me.
Thank you for the valuable contribution to the SMC module and the good discussion!
For the series:
D. Wythe
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Karsten Graul
Quoted 4 lines · D. Wythe
From: "D. Wythe" <[email protected]>
This patch set aims to optimizing performance of SMC in short-lived links scenarios, which is quite unsatisfactory right now.
Quoted 6 lines
This series looks good to me.
Thank you for the valuable contribution to the SMC module and the good discussion!
For the series:
Reviewed-by Karsten Graul <[email protected]>
My pleasure. Thank for all suggestions and reviews in all the series.
Best Wishes.