The Runtime Verification (RV) interface
Subsystems (7)
v3 cover The Runtime Verification (RV) interface
Over the last years, I've been exploring the possibility of verifying the Linux kernel behavior using Runtime Verification.
Runtime Verification (RV) is a lightweight (yet rigorous) method that complements classical exhaustive verification techniques (such as model checking and theorem proving) with a more practical approach for complex systems.
Instead of relying on a fine-grained model of a system (e.g., a re-implementation a instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of the system behavior.
The usage of deterministic automaton for RV is a well-established approach. In the specific case of the Linux kernel, you can check how to model complex behavior of the Linux kernel with this paper:
DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel Bristot; CUCINOTTA, Tommaso; DE OLIVEIRA, Romulo Silva. *Efficient formal verification for the Linux kernel.* In: International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 315-332.
And how efficient is this approach here:
DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel B.; DE OLIVEIRA, Romulo S.; CUCINOTTA, Tommaso. *A thread synchronization model for the PREEMPT_RT Linux kernel.* Journal of Systems Architecture, 2020, 107: 101729.
tlrd: it is possible to model complex behaviors in a modular way, with an acceptable overhead (even for production systems). See this presentation at 2019's ELCE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfTuEHafNgg
Here I am proposing a more practical approach for the usage of deterministic automata for runtime verification, and it includes:
- An interface for controlling the verification;
- A tool and set of headers that enables the automatic code generation of the RV monitor (Monitor Synthesis);
- Sample monitors to evaluate the interface;
- A sample monitor developed in the context of the Elisa Project demonstrating how to use RV in the context of safety-critical systems.
Given that RV is a tracing consumer, the code is being placed inside the tracing subsystem (Steven and I have been talking about it for a while).
Changes from v2:
- Tons of checkpatch and kernel test robot
- Moved files to better places
- Adjusted watchdog tracepoints patch (Guenter Roeck)
- Added pretimeout watchdog events (Peter Enderborg)
- Used task struct to store per-task monitors (Peter Zijlstra)
- Changed the instrumentation to use internal definition of tracepoint and check the callback signature (Steven Rostedt)
- Used printk_deferred() and removed the comment about deadlocks (Shuah Khan/John Ogness)
- Some simplifications:
- Removed the safe watchdog nowayout for now (myself)
- Removed export symbols for now (myself)
Changes from V1:
- rebased to the latest kernel;
- code cleanup;
- the watchdog dev monitor;
- safety app;
Things kept for a second moment (after this patchset):
- Add a reactor tha enables the visualization of the visited states via KCOV (Marco Elver & Dmitry Vyukov)
- Add a CRC method to check from user-space if the values exported by the monitor were not corrupted by any other kernel task (Gabriele Paoloni)
- Export symbols for external modules
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira (20):
rv: Add Runtime Verification (RV) interface
rv: Add runtime reactors interface
rv/include: Add helper functions for deterministic automata rv/include: Add deterministic automata monitor definition via C macros rv/include: Add instrumentation helper functions
tools/rv: Add dot2c
tools/rv: Add dot2k
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor skeleton created by dot2k rv/monitor: wip instrumentation and Makefile/Kconfig entries rv/monitor: Add the wwnr monitor skeleton created by dot2k rv/monitor: wwnr instrumentation and Makefile/Kconfig entries rv/reactor: Add the printk reactor
rv/reactor: Add the panic reactor
Documentation/rv: Add a basic documentation Documentation/rv: Add deterministic automata monitor synthesis
documentation
Documentation/rv: Add deterministic automata instrumentation
documentation
watchdog/dev: Add tracepoints
rv/monitor: Add safe watchdog monitor
rv/safety_app: Add an safety_app sample
Documentation/rv: Add watchdog-monitor documentation
Documentation/trace/index.rst | 1 + .../trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst | 223 ++++++ .../trace/rv/da_monitor_synthesis.rst | 286 +++++++ Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst | 9 + .../trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 233 ++++++ Documentation/trace/rv/watchdog-monitor.rst | 250 ++++++ drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 43 +- drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c | 2 + include/linux/rv.h | 36 + include/linux/sched.h | 11 + include/linux/watchdog.h | 7 +- include/rv/automata.h | 49 ++ include/rv/da_monitor.h | 421 ++++++++++ include/rv/instrumentation.h | 23 + include/rv/rv.h | 32 + include/trace/events/watchdog.h | 101 +++ kernel/fork.c | 14 + kernel/trace/Kconfig | 2 + kernel/trace/Makefile | 2 + kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 68 ++ kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 9 + kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/model.h | 84 ++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.c | 302 +++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.h | 64 ++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h | 38 + kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c | 112 +++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h | 64 ++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/model.h | 38 + kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c | 110 +++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h | 70 ++ kernel/trace/rv/reactor_panic.c | 44 + kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c | 43 + kernel/trace/rv/rv.c | 752 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/rv.h | 54 ++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 + kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 + tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile | 26 + tools/tracing/rv/dot2/automata.py | 179 +++++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c | 30 + tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c.py | 240 ++++++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k | 46 ++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k.py | 188 +++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.c | 97 +++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.h | 64 ++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.c | 97 +++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.h | 64 ++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.c | 97 +++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.h | 70 ++ tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/Makefile | 51 ++ tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/safety_app.c | 645 +++++++++++++++ 50 files changed, 5487 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_synthesis.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/watchdog-monitor.rst create mode 100644 include/linux/rv.h create mode 100644 include/rv/automata.h create mode 100644 include/rv/da_monitor.h create mode 100644 include/rv/instrumentation.h create mode 100644 include/rv/rv.h create mode 100644 include/trace/events/watchdog.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/Makefile create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/model.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/model.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/reactor_panic.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/rv.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/rv.h create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/automata.py create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c.py create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k.py create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.h create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.h create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.h create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/safety_app.c
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 1/20 Add Runtime Verification (RV) interface
RV is a lightweight (yet rigorous) method that complements classical exhaustive verification techniques (such as model checking and theorem proving) with a more practical approach to complex systems.
RV works by analyzing the trace of the system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of the system behavior. RV can give precise information on the runtime behavior of the monitored system while enabling the reaction for unexpected events, avoiding, for example, the propagation of a failure on safety-critical systems.
The development of this interface roots in the development of the paper:
DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel Bristot; CUCINOTTA, Tommaso; DE OLIVEIRA, Romulo Silva. Efficient formal verification for the Linux kernel. In:
International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 315-332.
And:
DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel Bristot, et al. Automata-based formal analysis and verification of the real-time Linux kernel. PhD Thesis, 2020.
The RV interface resembles the tracing/ interface on purpose. The current path for the RV interface is /sys/kernel/tracing/rv/.
It presents these files:
"available_monitors"
- List the available monitors, one per line.
For example:
[root@f32 rv]# cat available_monitors
wip
wwnr
"enabled_monitors"
- Lists the enabled monitors, one per line;
- Writing to it enables a given monitor;
- Writing a monitor name with a '-' prefix disables it;
- Truncating the file disables all enabled monitors.
For example:
[root@f32 rv]# cat enabled_monitors
[root@f32 rv]# echo wip > enabled_monitors
[root@f32 rv]# echo wwnr >> enabled_monitors
[root@f32 rv]# cat enabled_monitors
wip
wwnr
[root@f32 rv]# echo -wip >> enabled_monitors
[root@f32 rv]# cat enabled_monitors
wwnr
[root@f32 rv]# echo > enabled_monitors
[root@f32 rv]# cat enabled_monitors
[root@f32 rv]#
Note that more than one monitor can be enabled concurrently.
"monitoring_on"
- It is an on/off general switcher for monitoring. Note that it does not disable enabled monitors, but stop the per-entity monitors of monitoring the events received from the system. It resambles the "tracing_on" switcher.
"monitors/"
Each monitor will have its one directory inside "monitors/". There the monitor specific files will be presented.
The "monitors/" directory resambles the "events" directory on tracefs.
For example:
[root@f32 rv]# cd monitors/wip/
[root@f32 wip]# ls
desc enable
[root@f32 wip]# cat desc
auto-generated wakeup in preemptive monitor.
[root@f32 wip]# cat enable
0
For further information, see the comments in the header of kernel/trace/rv/rv.c from this patch.
--- include/linux/rv.h | 23 ++ include/linux/sched.h | 11 + include/rv/rv.h | 23 ++ kernel/fork.c | 14 + kernel/trace/Kconfig | 2 + kernel/trace/Makefile | 2 + kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 12 + kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 3 + kernel/trace/rv/rv.c | 738 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/rv.h | 34 ++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 + kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 + 12 files changed, 868 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/linux/rv.h create mode 100644 include/rv/rv.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/Makefile create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/rv.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/rv.h
include/linux/rv.h new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* +* Runtime Verification. +* +* For futher information, see: kernel/trace/rv/rv.c. +* +* Copyright (C) 2019-2022 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> +*/ +#ifndef _LINUX_RV_H +#define _LINUX_RV_H +struct rv_monitor { +const char *name; +const char *description; +bool enabled; +int (*start)(void ); +void (*stop)(void ); +void (*reset)(void ); +}; + +extern bool monitoring_on; +int rv_unregister_monitor (struct rv_monitor *monitor); +int rv_register_monitor (struct rv_monitor *monitor); +#endif /* _LINUX_RV_H */
include/linux/sched.h +11 -0
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@#include <linux/seqlock.h> #include <linux/kcsan.h> #include <asm/kmap_size.h> +#include <rv/rv.h> /* task_struct member predeclarations (sorted alphabetically): */ struct audit_context ;
@@ -1499,6 +1500,16 @@ struct task_struct {struct callback_head l1d_flush_kill;#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RV +/* +* Per-task RV monitor. Nowadays fixed in RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS. +* If we find justification for more monitors, we can think +* about adding more or developing a dynamic method. So far, +* none of these are justified. +*/ +union rv_task_monitor rv[RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS ]; +#endif +/* * New fields for task_struct should be added above here, so that * they are included in the randomized portion of task_struct.
include/rv/rv.h new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#ifndef _RV_RV_H +#define _RV_RV_H + +/* +* Per-task RV monitors count. Nowadays fixed in RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS. +* If we find justification for more monitors, we can think about +* adding more or developing a dynamic method. So far, none of +* these are justified. +*/ +#define RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS 1 +#define RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT (RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS) + +/* +* Futher monitor types are expected, so make this a union. +*/ +union rv_task_monitor { +}; + +int get_task_monitor_slot (void ); +void put_task_monitor_slot (int slot); +#endif /* _RV_RV_H */
kernel/fork.c +14 -0
@@ -1961,6 +1961,18 @@ static void copy_oom_score_adj(u64 clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)mutex_unlock (&oom_adj_mutex); } +#ifdef CONFIG_RV +static void rv_task_fork (struct task_struct *p) +{ +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS ; i++) + ; +} +#else +#define rv_task_fork (p) do {} while (0) +#endif +/* * This creates a new process as a copy of the old one, * but does not actually start it yet.
@@ -2393,6 +2405,8 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(*/ copy_seccomp (p); +rv_task_fork (p); +rseq_fork (p, clone_flags);/* Don't start children in a dying pid namespace */
kernel/trace/Kconfig +2 -0
@@ -1103,4 +1103,6 @@ config HIST_TRIGGERS_DEBUG If unsure, say N. +source "kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig" + endif # FTRACE
kernel/trace/Makefile +2 -0
@@ -104,3 +104,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_BENCHMARK) += trace_benchmark.o libftrace-y := ftrace.o + +obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv/
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig new file +12 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +# +menuconfig RV + bool "Runtime Verification" + depends on TRACING + help + Enable the kernel runtime verification infrastructure. RV is a + lightweight (yet rigorous) method that complements classical + exhaustive verification techniques (such as model checking and + theorem proving). RV works by analyzing the trace of the system's + actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of + the system behavior.
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile new file +3 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv.o
kernel/trace/rv/rv.c new file +738 -0
738 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/trace/rv/rv.h new file +34 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#include <linux/mutex.h> + +struct rv_interface { +struct dentry *root_dir; +struct dentry *monitors_dir; +}; + +#include "../trace.h" +#include <linux/tracefs.h> +#include <linux/rv.h> + +#define rv_create_dir tracefs_create_dir +#define rv_create_file tracefs_create_file +#define rv_remove tracefs_remove + +#define MAX_RV_MONITOR_NAME_SIZE 32 + +extern struct mutex rv_interface_lock; + +struct rv_monitor_def { +struct list_head list; +struct rv_monitor *monitor; +struct dentry *root_d; +bool enabled; +bool task_monitor; +}; + +extern bool monitoring_on; +struct dentry *get_monitors_root (void ); +void reset_all_monitors (void ); +int init_rv_monitors (struct dentry *root_dir); +int get_task_monitor_slot (void ); +void put_task_monitor_slot (int slot);
kernel/trace/trace.c +4 -0
@@ -9762,6 +9762,10 @@ static __init int tracer_init_tracefs(void)update_tracer_options (&global_trace); +#ifdef CONFIG_RV +rv_init_interface (); +#endif +return 0 ; }
kernel/trace/trace.h +2 -0
@@ -2009,4 +2009,6 @@ struct trace_min_max_param {extern const struct file_operations trace_min_max_fops; +extern int rv_init_interface (void ); +#endif /* _LINUX_KERNEL_TRACE_H */
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 2/20 Add runtime reactors interface
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraA runtime monitor can cause a reaction to the detection of an exception on the model's execution. By default, the monitors have tracing reactions, printing the monitor output via tracepoints. But other reactions can be added (on-demand) via this interface.
The user interface resembles the kernel tracing interface and presents these files:
"available_reactors"
- Reading shows the available reactors, one per line.
For example:
[root@f32 rv]# cat available_reactors
nop
panic
printk
"reacting_on"
- It is an on/off general switch for reactors, disabling all reactions.
"monitors/MONITOR/reactors"
- List available reactors, with the select reaction for the given MONITOR inside []. The default one is the nop (no operation) reactor.
- Writing the name of a reactor enables it to the given MONITOR.
For example:
[root@f32 rv]# cat monitors/wip/reactors [nop]
panic
printk
[root@f32 rv]# echo panic > monitors/wip/reactors [root@f32 rv]# cat monitors/wip/reactors nop
[panic]
printk
--- include/linux/rv.h | 13 +++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 1 + kernel/trace/rv/rv.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- kernel/trace/rv/rv.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/rv.h +13 -0
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@*/ #ifndef _LINUX_RV_H #define _LINUX_RV_H + +struct rv_reactor { + char *name; + char *description; + void (*react)(char *msg); +}; + struct rv_monitor { const char *name; const char *description;
@@ -15,9 +22,15 @@ struct rv_monitor {int (*start)(void );void (*stop)(void );void (*reset)(void ); + void (*react)(char *msg); + };extern bool monitoring_on;int rv_unregister_monitor (struct rv_monitor *monitor);int rv_register_monitor (struct rv_monitor *monitor); + +extern bool reacting_on; +int rv_unregister_reactor (struct rv_reactor *reactor); +int rv_register_reactor (struct rv_reactor *reactor);#endif /* _LINUX_RV_H */
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +14 -0
@@ -10,3 +10,17 @@ menuconfig RV theorem proving). RV works by analyzing the trace of the system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of the system behavior. + +if RV + +config RV_REACTORS + bool "Runtime verification reactors" + default y if RV + help + Enables the online runtime verification reactors. A runtime + monitor can cause a reaction to the detection of an exception + on the model's execution. By default, the monitors have + tracing reactions, printing the monitor output via tracepoints, + but other reactions can be added (on-demand) via this interface. + +endif # RV
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o
kernel/trace/rv/rv.c +16 -2
@@ -362,8 +362,13 @@ static int create_monitor_dir(struct rv_monitor_def *mdef) retval = -ENOMEM ; goto out_remove_root; } +#ifdef CONFIG_RV_REACTORS + retval =reactor_create_monitor_files (mdef); +if (retval) + goto out_remove_root; +#endif -return retval; +return 0 ; out_remove_root:rv_remove (mdef->root_d);
@@ -674,7 +679,11 @@ int rv_register_monitor(struct rv_monitor *monitor) r->monitor = monitor; -create_monitor_dir (r); + retval =create_monitor_dir (r); +if (retval) { +kfree (r); + goto out_unlock; + }list_add_tail (&r->list, &rv_monitors_list);
@@ -732,6 +741,11 @@ int __init rv_init_interface(void)rv_create_file ("monitoring_on" ,0600 , rv_root.root_dir,NULL , &monitoring_on_fops); +#ifdef CONFIG_RV_REACTORS +init_rv_reactors (rv_root.root_dir); + reacting_on = true; +#endif + monitoring_on = true;return 0 ;
kernel/trace/rv/rv.h +20 -0
@@ -15,14 +15,28 @@ struct rv_interface {#define rv_remove tracefs_remove#define MAX_RV_MONITOR_NAME_SIZE 32 +#define MAX_RV_REACTOR_NAME_SIZE 32extern struct mutex rv_interface_lock; +#ifdef CONFIG_RV_REACTORS +struct rv_reactor_def { +struct list_head list; +struct rv_reactor *reactor; +/* protected by the monitor interface lock */ +int counter; +}; +#endif +struct rv_monitor_def {struct list_head list;struct rv_monitor *monitor; +#ifdef CONFIG_RV_REACTORS +struct rv_reactor_def *rdef; +#endif struct dentry *root_d;bool enabled; +bool reacting;bool task_monitor; };
@@ -32,3 +46,9 @@ void reset_all_monitors(void);int init_rv_monitors (struct dentry *root_dir);int get_task_monitor_slot (void );void put_task_monitor_slot (int slot); + +#ifdef CONFIG_RV_REACTORS +extern bool reacting_on; +int reactor_create_monitor_files (struct rv_monitor_def *mdef); +int init_rv_reactors (struct dentry *root_dir); +#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 3/20 rv/include: Add helper functions for deterministic automata
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraFormally, a deterministic automaton, denoted by G, is defined as a quintuple:
G = { X, E, f, x_0, X_m }
where:
- X is the set of states;
- E is the finite set of events;
- x_0 is the initial state;
- X_m (subset of X) is the set of marked states.
- f : X x E -> X $ is the transition function. It defines the state transition in the occurrence of a event from E in the state X. In the special case of deterministic automata, the occurrence of the event in E in a state in X has a deterministic next state from X.
An automaton can also be represented using a graphical format of vertices (nodes) and edges. The open-source tool Graphviz can produce this graphic format using the (textual) DOT language as the source code.
The dot2c tool presented in this paper:
DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel Bristot; CUCINOTTA, Tommaso; DE OLIVEIRA, Romulo Silva. Efficient formal verification for the Linux kernel. In:
International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 315-332.
Translates a deterministic automaton in the DOT format into a C source code representation that to be used for monitoring.
This header file implements helper functions to facilitate the usage of the C output from dot2c for monitoring.
--- include/rv/automata.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/rv/automata.h
include/rv/automata.h new file +49 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* +* Deterministic automata helper functions, to be used with the automata +* models in C generated by the dot2k tool. +* +* Copyright (C) 2019-2022 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> +*/ + +#define DECLARE_AUTOMATA_HELPERS (name, type) \ + \ +static inline void *model_get_model_##name(void) \ +{ \ + return (void *) &automaton_##name; \ +} \ + \ +static char *model_get_state_name_##name(enum states_##name state) \ +{ \ + return automaton_##name.state_names[state]; \ +} \ + \ +static char *model_get_event_name_##name(enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + return automaton_##name.event_names[event]; \ +} \ + \ +static inline type model_get_init_state_##name(void) \ +{ \ + return automaton_##name.initial_state; \ +} \ + \ +static inline type model_get_next_state_##name(enum states_##name curr_state, \ + enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + if ((curr_state < 0) || (curr_state > state_max)) \ + return -1; \ + \ + if ((event < 0) || (event > event_max)) \ + return -1; \ + \ + return automaton_##name.function[curr_state][event]; \ +} \ + \ +static inline bool model_is_final_state_##name(enum states_##name state) \ +{ \ + if ((state < 0) || (state > state_max)) \ + return 0; \ + \ + return !!automaton_##name.final_states[state]; \ +}
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 4/20 rv/include: Add deterministic automata monitor definition via C macros
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraIn Linux terms, the runtime verification monitors are encapsulated inside the "RV monitor" abstraction. The "RV monitor" includes a set of instances of the monitor (per-cpu monitor, per-task monitor, and so on), the helper functions that glue the monitor to the system reference model, and the trace output as a reaction for event parsing and exceptions, as depicted below:
Linux +----- RV Monitor ----------------------------------+ Formal
Realm | | Realm
+-------------------+ +----------------+ +-----------------+
| Linux kernel | | Monitor | | Reference |
| Tracing | -> | Instance(s) | <- | Model |
| (instrumentation) | | (verification) | | (specification) |
+-------------------+ +----------------+ +-----------------+
| | |
| V |
| +----------+ |
| | Reaction | |
| +--+--+--+-+ |
| | | | |
| | | +-> trace output ? |
+------------------------|--|----------------------+
| +----> panic ?
+-------> <user-specified>The dot2c tool presented in this paper:
DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel Bristot; CUCINOTTA, Tommaso; DE OLIVEIRA, Romulo Silva. Efficient formal verification for the Linux kernel. In:
International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 315-332.
Translates a deterministic automaton in the DOT format into a C source code representation that to be used for monitoring connecting the Formal Reaml to Linux-like code.
This header file goes beyond, extending the code generation to the verification stage, generating the code to the Monitor Instance(s) level using C macros. The trace event code inspires this approach.
The benefits of the usage of macro for monitor synthesis is 3-fold:
- Reduces the code duplication;
- Facilitates the bug fix/improvement;
(but mainly:)
- Avoids the case of developers changing the core of the monitor code to manipulate the model in a (let's say) non-standard way.
This initial implementation presents three different types of monitor instances:
- #define DECLARE_DA_MON_GLOBAL(name, type)
- #define DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(name, type)
- #define DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_TASK(name, type)
The first declares the functions for a global deterministic automata monitor, the second with per-cpu instances, and the third with per-task instances.
In all cases, the name is a string that identifies the monitor, and the type is the data type used by dot2c/k on the representation of the model.
For example, the model "wip" below:
preempt_disable sched_waking
+############+ >------------------> +################+ >------------+
-># preemptive # # non-preemptive # |
+############+ <-----------------< +################+ <------------+
preempt_enable
with two states and three events can be stored in a 'char' type. Considering that the preemption control is a per-cpu behavior, the monitor declaration will be:
DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(wip, char);
The monitor is executed by sending events to be processed via the functions presented below:
da_handle_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)($(event from event enum)); da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)($(event from event enum));
The function da_handle_event_$(MONITOR_NAME) is the regular case, while the function da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)() is a special case used to synchronize the system with the model.
When a monitor is enabled, it is placed in the initial state of the automata. However, the monitor does not know if the system is in the initial state. Hence, the monitor ignores events sent by sent by da_handle_event_$(MONITOR_NAME) until the function da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)() is called.
The function da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)() should be used for the case in which the system generates the event is the one that returns the automata to the initial state.
After receiving a da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)() event, the monitor will know that it is in sync with the system and hence will start processing the next events.
Using the wip model as example, the events "preempt_disable" and "sched_waking" should be sent to monitor, respectively, via:
da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable);
da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking);While the event "preempt_enabled" will use:
da_handle_init_event_wip(preempt_enable);
To notify the monitor that the system will be returning to the initial state, so the system and the monitor should be in sync.
With the monitor synthesis in place, using these headers and dot2k, the developer's work should be limited to the instrumentation of the system, increasing the confidence in the overall approach.
--- include/rv/da_monitor.h | 421 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/rv/rv.h | 9 + kernel/fork.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 include/rv/da_monitor.h
include/rv/da_monitor.h new file +421 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* +* Deterministic automata (DA) monitor functions, to be used togheter +* with automata models in C generated by the dot2k tool. +* +* The dot2k tool is available at tools/tracing/rv/ +* +* Copyright (C) 2019-2022 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> +*/ + +#include <rv/automata.h> +#include <linux/rv.h> + +/* +* Generic helpers for all types of deterministic automata monitors. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_GENERIC_HELPERS (name, type) \ +static char REACT_MSG[1024]; \ + \ +static inline char \ +*format_react_msg(type curr_state, type event) \ +{ \ + snprintf(REACT_MSG, 1024, \ + "rv: monitor %s does not allow event %s on state %s\n", \ + MODULE_NAME, \ + model_get_event_name_##name(event), \ + model_get_state_name_##name(curr_state)); \ + return REACT_MSG; \ +} \ + \ +static void cond_react(char *msg) \ +{ \ + if (rv_##name.react) \ + rv_##name.react(msg); \ +} \ + \ +static inline void da_monitor_reset_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon) \ +{ \ + da_mon->monitoring = 0; \ + da_mon->curr_state = model_get_init_state_##name(); \ +} \ + \ +static inline type da_monitor_curr_state_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon) \ +{ \ + return da_mon->curr_state; \ +} \ + \ +static inline void \ +da_monitor_set_state_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon, enum states_##name state)\ +{ \ + da_mon->curr_state = state; \ +} \ +static inline void da_monitor_start_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon) \ +{ \ + da_mon->monitoring = 1; \ +} \ + \ +static inline bool da_monitoring_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon) \ +{ \ + return da_mon->monitoring; \ +} + + +/* +* Event handler for implict monitors. Implicity monitor is the one which the +* handler does not need to specify which da_monitor to manilupulate. Examples +* of implicit monitor are the per_cpu or the global ones. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_MODEL_HANDLER_IMPLICIT (name, type) \ +static inline void \ +trace_event_##name(type state, type event, type next_state, bool safe); \ +static inline void trace_error_##name(type state, type event); \ + \ +static inline bool \ +da_event_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon, enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + type curr_state = da_monitor_curr_state_##name(da_mon); \ + type next_state = model_get_next_state_##name(curr_state, event); \ + \ + if (next_state >= 0) { \ + da_monitor_set_state_##name(da_mon, next_state); \ + \ + trace_event_##name(curr_state, event, next_state, \ + model_is_final_state_##name(next_state)); \ + \ + return true; \ + } \ + \ + if (reacting_on) \ + cond_react(format_react_msg(curr_state, event)); \ + \ + trace_error_##name(curr_state, event); \ + \ + return false; \ +} \ + +/* +* Event handler for per_task monitors. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_MODEL_HANDLER_PER_TASK (name, type) \ + \ +static inline void \ +trace_event_##name(pid_t pid, type state, type event, \ + type next_state, bool safe); \ +static inline void trace_error_##name(pid_t pid, type state, type event); \ + \ +static inline type \ +da_event_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon, struct task_struct *tsk, \ + enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + type curr_state = da_monitor_curr_state_##name(da_mon); \ + type next_state = model_get_next_state_##name(curr_state, event); \ + \ + if (next_state >= 0) { \ + da_monitor_set_state_##name(da_mon, next_state); \ + \ + trace_event_##name(tsk->pid, curr_state, event, next_state, \ + model_is_final_state_##name(next_state)); \ + \ + return true; \ + } \ + \ + if (reacting_on) \ + cond_react(format_react_msg(curr_state, event)); \ + \ + trace_error_##name(tsk->pid, curr_state, event); \ + \ + return false; \ +} + +/* +* Functions to define, init and get a global monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_INIT_GLOBAL (name, type) \ + \ +static struct da_monitor da_mon_##name; \ + \ +static struct da_monitor *da_get_monitor_##name(void) \ +{ \ + return &da_mon_##name; \ +} \ + \ +static void da_monitor_reset_all_##name(void) \ +{ \ + da_monitor_reset_##name(da_mon_##name); \ +} \ + \ +static inline int da_monitor_init_##name(void) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon = &da_mon_##name \ + da_mon->curr_state = model_get_init_state_##name(); \ + da_mon->monitoring = 0; \ + return 0; \ +} \ + \ +static inline void da_monitor_destroy_##name(void) \ +{ \ + return; \ +} + +/* +* Functions to define, init and get a per-cpu monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_INIT_PER_CPU (name, type) \ + \ +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct da_monitor, da_mon_##name); \ + \ +static struct da_monitor *da_get_monitor_##name(void) \ +{ \ + return this_cpu_ptr(&da_mon_##name); \ +} \ + \ +static void da_monitor_reset_all_##name(void) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon; \ + int cpu; \ + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { \ + da_mon = per_cpu_ptr(&da_mon_##name, cpu); \ + da_monitor_reset_##name(da_mon); \ + } \ +} \ + \ +static inline int da_monitor_init_##name(void) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon; \ + int cpu; \ + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { \ + da_mon = per_cpu_ptr(&da_mon_##name, cpu); \ + da_mon->curr_state = model_get_init_state_##name(); \ + da_mon->monitoring = 0; \ + } \ + return 0; \ +} \ + \ +static inline void da_monitor_destroy_##name(void) \ +{ \ + return; \ +} + +/* +* Functions to define, init and get a per-task monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_INIT_PER_TASK (name, type) \ + \ +static int task_mon_slot_##name = RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT; \ + \ +static inline struct da_monitor *da_get_monitor_##name(struct task_struct *tsk) \ +{ \ + return &tsk->rv[task_mon_slot_##name].da_mon; \ +} \ + \ +static void da_monitor_reset_all_##name(void) \ +{ \ + struct task_struct *g, *p; \ + \ + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); \ + for_each_process_thread(g, p) \ + da_monitor_reset_##name(da_get_monitor_##name(p)); \ + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); \ +} \ + \ +static int da_monitor_init_##name(void) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon; \ + struct task_struct *g, *p; \ + int retval; \ + \ + retval = get_task_monitor_slot(); \ + if (retval < 0) \ + return retval; \ + \ + task_mon_slot_##name = retval; \ + \ + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); \ + for_each_process_thread(g, p) { \ + da_mon = da_get_monitor_##name(p); \ + da_mon->curr_state = model_get_init_state_##name(); \ + da_mon->monitoring = 0; \ + } \ + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); \ + \ + return 0; \ +} \ + \ +static inline void da_monitor_destroy_##name(void) \ +{ \ + if (task_mon_slot_##name == RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT) { \ + WARN_ONCE(1, "Disabling a disabled monitor: " #name); \ + return; \ + } \ + put_task_monitor_slot(task_mon_slot_##name); \ + return; \ +} + +/* +* Handle event for implicit monitor: da_get_monitor_##name() will figure out +* the monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_MONITOR_HANDLER_IMPLICIT (name, type) \ + \ +static inline void __da_handle_event_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon, \ + enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + int retval; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!monitoring_on)) \ + return; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!rv_##name.enabled)) \ + return; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!da_monitoring_##name(da_mon))) \ + return; \ + \ + retval = da_event_##name(da_mon, event); \ + \ + if (!retval) \ + da_monitor_reset_##name(da_mon); \ +} \ + \ +static inline void da_handle_event_##name(enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon = da_get_monitor_##name(); \ + __da_handle_event_##name(da_mon, event); \ +} \ + \ +static inline bool da_handle_init_event_##name(enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!rv_##name.enabled)) \ + return false; \ + \ + da_mon = da_get_monitor_##name(); \ + \ + if (unlikely(!da_monitoring_##name(da_mon))) { \ + da_monitor_start_##name(da_mon); \ + return false; \ + } \ + \ + __da_handle_event_##name(da_mon, event); \ + \ + return true; \ +} \ + \ +static inline bool da_handle_init_run_event_##name(enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!rv_##name.enabled)) \ + return false; \ + \ + da_mon = da_get_monitor_##name(); \ + \ + if (unlikely(!da_monitoring_##name(da_mon))) \ + da_monitor_start_##name(da_mon); \ + \ + __da_handle_event_##name(da_mon, event); \ + \ + return true; \ +} + +/* +* Handle event for per task. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_MONITOR_HANDLER_PER_TASK (name, type) \ + \ +static inline void \ +__da_handle_event_##name(struct da_monitor *da_mon, struct task_struct *tsk, \ + enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + int retval; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!monitoring_on)) \ + return; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!rv_##name.enabled)) \ + return; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!da_monitoring_##name(da_mon))) \ + return; \ + \ + retval = da_event_##name(da_mon, tsk, event); \ + \ + if (!retval) \ + da_monitor_reset_##name(da_mon); \ +} \ + \ +static inline void \ +da_handle_event_##name(struct task_struct *tsk, enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon = da_get_monitor_##name(tsk); \ + __da_handle_event_##name(da_mon, tsk, event); \ +} \ + \ +static inline bool \ +da_handle_init_event_##name(struct task_struct *tsk, enum events_##name event) \ +{ \ + struct da_monitor *da_mon; \ + \ + if (unlikely(!rv_##name.enabled)) \ + return false; \ + \ + da_mon = da_get_monitor_##name(tsk); \ + \ + if (unlikely(!da_monitoring_##name(da_mon))) { \ + da_monitor_start_##name(da_mon); \ + return false; \ + } \ + \ + __da_handle_event_##name(da_mon, tsk, event); \ + \ + return true; \ +} + +/* +* Entry point for the global monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_GLOBAL (name, type) \ + \ +DECLARE_AUTOMATA_HELPERS(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_GENERIC_HELPERS(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_MODEL_HANDLER_IMPLICIT(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_INIT_PER_CPU(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_MONITOR_HANDLER_IMPLICIT(name, type); + + +/* +* Entry point for the per-cpu monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU (name, type) \ + \ +DECLARE_AUTOMATA_HELPERS(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_GENERIC_HELPERS(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_MODEL_HANDLER_IMPLICIT(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_INIT_PER_CPU(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_MONITOR_HANDLER_IMPLICIT(name, type); + + +/* +* Entry point for the per-task monitor. +*/ +#define DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_TASK (name, type) \ + \ +DECLARE_AUTOMATA_HELPERS(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_GENERIC_HELPERS(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_MODEL_HANDLER_PER_TASK(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_INIT_PER_TASK(name, type); \ + \ +DECLARE_DA_MON_MONITOR_HANDLER_PER_TASK(name, type);
include/rv/rv.h +9 -0
@@ -3,6 +3,14 @@#ifndef _RV_RV_H#define _RV_RV_H +/* +* Deterministic automaton per-object variables. +*/ +struct da_monitor { +bool monitoring; +int curr_state; +}; +/* * Per-task RV monitors count. Nowadays fixed in RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS. * If we find justification for more monitors, we can think about
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@* Futher monitor types are expected, so make this a union. */ union rv_task_monitor { +struct da_monitor da_mon; };int get_task_monitor_slot (void );
kernel/fork.c +1 -1
@@ -1967,7 +1967,7 @@ static void rv_task_fork(struct task_struct *p)int i;for (i =0 ; i <RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS ; i++) - ; + p->rv[i].da_mon.monitoring = false; }#else #define rv_task_fork (p) do {} while (0)
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 5/20 rv/include: Add instrumentation helper functions
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraInstrumentation helper functions to facilitate the instrumentation of auto-generated RV monitors create by dot2k.
--- include/rv/instrumentation.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/rv/instrumentation.h
include/rv/instrumentation.h new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* +* Helper functions to facilitate the instrumentation of auto-generated +* RV monitors create by dot2k. +* +* The dot2k tool is available at tools/tracing/rv/dot2/ +* +* Copyright (C) 2019-2022 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> +*/ + +#include <linux/ftrace.h> + +#define rv_attach_trace_probe (monitor, tp, rv_handler) \ + do { \ + check_trace_callback_type_##tp(rv_handler); \ + WARN_ONCE(register_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL), \ + "fail attaching " #monitor " " #tp "handler"); \ + } while (0) + +#define rv_detach_trace_probe (monitor, tp, rv_handler) \ + do { \ + unregister_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL); \ + } while (0)
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 6/20 tools/rv: Add dot2c
In reply to Daniel Bristot de Oliveiradot2c is a tool that transforms an automata in the graphiviz .dot file into an C representation of the automata.
usage: dot2c [-h] dot_file
dot2c: converts a .dot file into a C structure
positional arguments:
dot_file The dot file to be converted
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
--- tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile | 21 +++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/automata.py | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c | 30 ++++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c.py | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 470 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/automata.py create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c.py
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile new file +21 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +INSTALL=install + +prefix ?= /usr +bindir ?= $(prefix)/bin +mandir ?= $(prefix)/share/man +miscdir ?= $(prefix)/share/dot2 +srcdir ?= $(prefix)/src + +PYLIB ?= $(shell python3 -c 'import sysconfig; print (sysconfig.get_path("purelib"))') + +.PHONY: all +all: + +.PHONY: clean +clean: + +.PHONY: install +install: + $(INSTALL) automata.py -D -m 644 $(DESTDIR)$(PYLIB)/dot2/automata.py + $(INSTALL) dot2c.py -D -m 644 $(DESTDIR)$(PYLIB)/dot2/dot2c.py + $(INSTALL) dot2c -D -m 755 $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/automata.py new file +179 -0
179 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c new file +30 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +# +# dot2m: transform dot files into C structures. +# For more information, see: +# https://bristot.me/efficient-formal-verification-for-the-linux-kernel/ +# +# This program was written in the development of this paper: +# de Oliveira, D. B. and Cucinotta, T. and de Oliveira, R. S. +# "Efficient Formal Verification for the Linux Kernel." International +# Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Springer, Cham, 2019. +# +# Copyright 2018-2020 Red Hat, Inc. +# +# Author: +# Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> + +if __name__ == '__main__': + from dot2 import dot2c + import argparse + import ntpath + import sys + + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='dot2c: converts a .dot file into a C structure') + parser.add_argument('dot_file', help='The dot file to be converted') + + + args = parser.parse_args() + d=dot2c.Dot2c(args.dot_file) + d.print_model_classic()
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2c.py new file +240 -0
240 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 7/20 tools/rv: Add dot2k
In reply to Daniel Bristot de Oliveiratransform .dot file into kernel rv monitor
usage: dot2k [-h] -d DOT_FILE -t MONITOR_TYPE [-n MODEL_NAME] [-D DESCRIPTION]
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-d DOT_FILE, --dot DOT_FILE
-t MONITOR_TYPE, --monitor_type MONITOR_TYPE
-n MODEL_NAME, --model_name MODEL_NAME
-D DESCRIPTION, --description DESCRIPTION
--- tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile | 5 + tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k | 46 +++++ tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k.py | 188 ++++++++++++++++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.c | 97 +++++++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.h | 64 ++++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.c | 97 +++++++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.h | 64 ++++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.c | 97 +++++++++ .../rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.h | 70 +++++++ 9 files changed, 728 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k.py create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.h create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.h create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.c create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.h
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/Makefile +5 -0
@@ -19,3 +19,8 @@ install: $(INSTALL) automata.py -D -m 644 $(DESTDIR)$(PYLIB)/dot2/automata.py $(INSTALL) dot2c.py -D -m 644 $(DESTDIR)$(PYLIB)/dot2/dot2c.py $(INSTALL) dot2c -D -m 755 $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/ + $(INSTALL) dot2k.py -D -m 644 $(DESTDIR)$(PYLIB)/dot2/dot2k.py + $(INSTALL) dot2k -D -m 755 $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/ + + mkdir -p ${miscdir}/ + cp -rp dot2k_templates $(DESTDIR)$(miscdir)/
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k new file +46 -0
46 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k.py new file +188 -0
188 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.c new file +97 -0
97 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_global.h new file +64 -0
64 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.c new file +97 -0
97 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_cpu.h new file +64 -0
64 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.c new file +97 -0
97 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/tracing/rv/dot2/dot2k_templates/main_per_task.h new file +70 -0
70 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 8/20 rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor skeleton created by dot2k
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraThis is the direct output this command line:
$ dot2k -d ~/wip.dot -t per_cpu
with wip.dot as:
----- %< -----
digraph state_automaton {
center = true;
size = "7,11";
rankdir = LR;
{node [shape = circle] "non_preemptive"};
{node [shape = plaintext, style=invis, label=""] "__init_preemptive"};
{node [shape = doublecircle] "preemptive"};
{node [shape = circle] "preemptive"};
"__init_preemptive" -> "preemptive";
"non_preemptive" [label = "non_preemptive"];
"non_preemptive" -> "non_preemptive" [ label = "sched_waking" ];
"non_preemptive" -> "preemptive" [ label = "preempt_enable" ];
"preemptive" [label = "preemptive"];
"preemptive" -> "non_preemptive" [ label = "preempt_disable" ];
{ rank = min ;
"__init_preemptive";
"preemptive";
}
}----- >% -----
This model is broken because preempt_disable_notrace(). It is broken on purpose to test the reactors.
It does not compile because it lacks the instrumentation, which will be add next.
--- kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h | 38 +++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 217 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h new file +38 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +enum states_wip { + preemptive =0 , + non_preemptive, + state_max +}; + +enum events_wip { + preempt_disable =0 , + preempt_enable, + sched_waking, + event_max +}; + +struct automaton_wip { +char *state_names[state_max]; +char *event_names[event_max]; +char function[state_max][event_max]; +char initial_state; +char final_states[state_max]; +}; + +struct automaton_wip automaton_wip = { + .state_names = { +"preemptive" , +"non_preemptive" + }, + .event_names = { +"preempt_disable" , +"preempt_enable" , +"sched_waking" + }, + .function = { + { non_preemptive,-1 ,-1 }, + {-1 , preemptive, non_preemptive }, + }, + .initial_state = preemptive, + .final_states = {1 ,0 }, +};
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c new file +115 -0
115 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h new file +64 -0
64 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 9/20 rv/monitor: wip instrumentation and Makefile/Kconfig entries
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdds the instrumentation to the previously created wip monitor, as an example of the developer work. It also adds a Makefile and Kconfig entries.
This is a good example of the manual work that is left for the developer to do.
--- kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 7 ++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 1 + kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h | 2 +- kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c | 33 +++++++++++++---------------- kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h | 2 +- 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +7 -0
@@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ menuconfig RV if RV +config RV_MON_WIP + depends on PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS + bool "WIP monitor" + help + Enable WIP sample monitor, this is a sample monitor that + illustrates the usage of per-cpu monitors. + config RV_REACTORS bool "Runtime verification reactors" default y if RV
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WIP) += monitor_wip/wip.o
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/model.h +1 -1
@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ struct automaton_wip automaton_wip = { }, .initial_state = preemptive, .final_states = { 1, 0 }, -}; +};
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.c +15 -18
@@ -8,12 +8,10 @@#include <rv/instrumentation.h> #include <rv/da_monitor.h> -#define MODULE_NAME "wip" +#include <trace/events/sched.h> +#include <trace/events/preemptirq.h> -/* -* XXX: include required tracepoint headers, e.g., -* #include <linux/trace/events/sched.h> -*/ +#define MODULE_NAME "wip"/* * This is the self-generated part of the monitor. Generally, there is no need
@@ -39,22 +37,21 @@ DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(wip, char);* are translated into model's event. * */ -static void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) +static void handle_preempt_disable (void *data,unsigned long ip,unsigned long parent_ip) {da_handle_event_wip (preempt_disable); } -static void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) +static void handle_preempt_enable (void *data,unsigned long ip,unsigned long parent_ip) { -da_handle_event_wip (preempt_enable); +da_handle_init_event_wip (preempt_enable); } -static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) +static void handle_sched_waking (void *data,struct task_struct *task) {da_handle_event_wip (sched_waking); } -static int start_wip (void ) {int retval;
@@ -63,9 +60,9 @@ static int start_wip(void)if (retval)return retval; - rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); - rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); - rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); +rv_attach_trace_probe ("wip" , preempt_disable, handle_preempt_disable); +rv_attach_trace_probe ("wip" , preempt_enable, handle_preempt_enable); +rv_attach_trace_probe ("wip" , sched_waking, handle_sched_waking);return 0 ; }
@@ -74,9 +71,9 @@ static void stop_wip(void) { rv_wip.enabled =0 ; - rv_detach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); - rv_detach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); - rv_detach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); +rv_detach_trace_probe ("wip" , preempt_disable, handle_preempt_disable); +rv_detach_trace_probe ("wip" , preempt_enable, handle_preempt_enable); +rv_detach_trace_probe ("wip" , sched_waking, handle_sched_waking);da_monitor_destroy_wip (); }
@@ -111,5 +108,5 @@ module_init(register_wip);module_exit (unregister_wip);MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); -MODULE_AUTHOR ("dot2k: auto-generated" ); -MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("wip" ); +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("wip: wakeup in preemptive - per-cpu sample monitor." );
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/wip.h +1 -1
@@ -59,6 +59,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(error_wip,/* This part ust be outside protection */ #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH -#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH . +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wip/ #define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE wip#include <trace/define_trace.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 10/20 rv/monitor: Add the wwnr monitor skeleton created by dot2k
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraPer task wakeup while not running (wwnr) monitor, generated by dot2k with this command line:
$ dot2k -d wwnr.dot -t per_task
The model is:
----- %< -----
digraph state_automaton {
center = true;
size = "7,11";
{node [shape = plaintext, style=invis, label=""] "__init_not_running"};
{node [shape = ellipse] "not_running"};
{node [shape = plaintext] "not_running"};
{node [shape = plaintext] "running"};
"__init_not_running" -> "not_running";
"not_running" [label = "not_running", color = green3];
"not_running" -> "not_running" [ label = "wakeup" ];
"not_running" -> "running" [ label = "switch_in" ];
"running" [label = "running"];
"running" -> "not_running" [ label = "switch_out" ];
{ rank = min ;
"__init_not_running";
"not_running";
}
}----- >% -----
This model is broken, the reason is that a task can be running in the processor without being set as RUNNABLE. Think about a task about to sleep:
1: set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
2: schedule();
And then imagine an IRQ happening in between the lines one and two, waking the task up. BOOM, the wakeup will happen while the task is running.
Q: Why do we need this model, so?
A: To test the reactors.
--- kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/model.h | 38 +++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h | 70 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 226 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/model.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/model.h new file +38 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +enum states_wwnr { + not_running =0 , + running, + state_max +}; + +enum events_wwnr { + switch_in =0 , + switch_out, + wakeup, + event_max +}; + +struct automaton_wwnr { +char *state_names[state_max]; +char *event_names[event_max]; +char function[state_max][event_max]; +char initial_state; +char final_states[state_max]; +}; + +struct automaton_wwnr automaton_wwnr = { + .state_names = { +"not_running" , +"running" + }, + .event_names = { +"switch_in" , +"switch_out" , +"wakeup" + }, + .function = { + { running,-1 , not_running }, + {-1 , not_running,-1 }, + }, + .initial_state = not_running, + .final_states = {1 ,0 }, +};
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c new file +118 -0
118 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h new file +70 -0
70 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 11/20 rv/monitor: wwnr instrumentation and Makefile/Kconfig entries
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdds the instrumentation to the previously created wwnr monitor, as an example of the developer work. It also adds a Makefile and Kconfig entries.
--- kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 7 ++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 1 + kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c | 38 ++++++++++++----------------- kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h | 2 +- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +7 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ config RV_MON_WIP Enable WIP sample monitor, this is a sample monitor that illustrates the usage of per-cpu monitors. +config RV_MON_WWNR + bool "WWNR monitor" + help + Enable WWNR sample monitor, this is a sample monitor that + illustrates the usage of per-task monitor. The model is + broken on purpose: it serves to test reactors. + config RV_REACTORS bool "Runtime verification reactors" default y if RV
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WIP) += monitor_wip/wip.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WWNR) += monitor_wwnr/wwnr.o
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.c +15 -23
@@ -8,12 +8,9 @@#include <rv/instrumentation.h> #include <rv/da_monitor.h> -#define MODULE_NAME "wwnr" +#include <trace/events/sched.h> -/* -* XXX: include required tracepoint headers, e.g., -* #include <linux/trace/events/sched.h> -*/ +#define MODULE_NAME "wwnr"/* * This is the self-generated part of the monitor. Generally, there is no need
@@ -39,25 +36,22 @@ DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_TASK(wwnr, char);* are translated into model's event. * */ -static void handle_switch_in(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) +static void handle_switch (void *data,bool preempt,unsigned int prev_state,struct task_struct *p,struct task_struct *n) { - struct task_struct *p = /* XXX: how do I get p? */; -da_handle_event_wwnr (p, switch_in); -} +/* start monitoring only after the first suspension */ +if (prev_state ==TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ) +da_handle_init_event_wwnr (p, switch_out); +else +da_handle_event_wwnr (p, switch_out); -static void handle_switch_out(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) -{ - struct task_struct *p = /* XXX: how do I get p? */; -da_handle_event_wwnr (p, switch_out); +da_handle_event_wwnr (n, switch_in); } -static void handle_wakeup(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) +static void handle_wakeup (void *data,struct task_struct *p) { - struct task_struct *p = /* XXX: how do I get p? */;da_handle_event_wwnr (p, wakeup); } -static int start_wwnr (void ) {int retval;
@@ -66,9 +60,8 @@ static int start_wwnr(void)if (retval)return retval; - rv_attach_trace_probe("wwnr", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_switch_in); - rv_attach_trace_probe("wwnr", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_switch_out); - rv_attach_trace_probe("wwnr", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_wakeup); +rv_attach_trace_probe ("wwnr" , sched_switch, handle_switch); +rv_attach_trace_probe ("wwnr" , sched_wakeup, handle_wakeup);return 0 ; }
@@ -77,9 +70,8 @@ static void stop_wwnr(void) { rv_wwnr.enabled =0 ; - rv_detach_trace_probe("wwnr", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_switch_in); - rv_detach_trace_probe("wwnr", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_switch_out); - rv_detach_trace_probe("wwnr", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_wakeup); +rv_detach_trace_probe ("wwnr" , sched_switch, handle_switch); +rv_detach_trace_probe ("wwnr" , sched_wakeup, handle_wakeup);da_monitor_destroy_wwnr (); }
@@ -89,7 +81,7 @@ static void stop_wwnr(void)*/ struct rv_monitor rv_wwnr = { .name ="wwnr" , - .description ="auto-generated wwnr" , + .description ="wwnr: wakeup while not running: per-task sample monitor." , .start = start_wwnr, .stop = stop_wwnr, .reset = da_monitor_reset_all_wwnr,
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/wwnr.h +1 -1
@@ -65,6 +65,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(error_wwnr,/* This part ust be outside protection */ #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH -#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH . +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../kernel/trace/rv/monitor_wwnr/ #define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE wwnr#include <trace/define_trace.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 12/20 rv/reactor: Add the printk reactor
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraSample reactor that printks the reaction message.
--- kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 8 ++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 3 ++- kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +8 -0
@@ -37,4 +37,12 @@ config RV_REACTORS tracing reactions, printing the monitor output via tracepoints, but other reactions can be added (on-demand) via this interface. +config RV_REACT_PRINTK + bool "Printk reactor" + depends on RV_REACTORS + default y if RV_REACTORS + help + Enables the printk reactor. The printk reactor emmits a printk() + message if an exception is found. + endif # RV
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile +2 -1
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv.o -obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WIP) += monitor_wip/wip.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WWNR) += monitor_wwnr/wwnr.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACT_PRINTK) += reactor_printk.o
kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c new file +43 -0
43 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 13/20 rv/reactor: Add the panic reactor
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraSample reactor that panics the system when an exception is found. This is useful both to capture a vmcore, or to fail-safe a critical system.
--- kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 8 ++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 1 + kernel/trace/rv/reactor_panic.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/reactor_panic.c
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +8 -0
@@ -45,4 +45,12 @@ config RV_REACT_PRINTK Enables the printk reactor. The printk reactor emmits a printk() message if an exception is found. +config RV_REACT_PANIC + bool "Panic reactor" + depends on RV_REACTORS + default y if RV_REACTORS + help + Enables the panic reactor. The panic reactor emmits a printk() + message if an exception is found and panic()s the system. + endif # RV
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WIP) += monitor_wip/wip.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WWNR) += monitor_wwnr/wwnr.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACT_PRINTK) += reactor_printk.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACT_PANIC) += reactor_panic.o
kernel/trace/rv/reactor_panic.c new file +44 -0
44 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 14/20 Documentation/rv: Add a basic documentation
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdd the runtime-verification.rst document, explaining the basics of RV and how to use the interface.
--- Documentation/trace/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst | 9 + .../trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 233 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 3 + 4 files changed, 246 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
Documentation/trace/index.rst +1 -0
@@ -32,3 +32,4 @@ Linux Tracing Technologies sys-t coresight/index user_events + rv/index
Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst new file +9 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +=================================== +RV - Runtime Verification Interface +=================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + :glob: + + *
Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst new file +233 -0
233 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +3 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ menuconfig RV actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of the system behavior. + For further information, see: + Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst + if RV config RV_MON_WIP
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 15/20 Documentation/rv: Add deterministic automata monitor synthesis documentation
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdd the da_monitor_synthesis.rst introduces some concepts behind the Deterministic Automata (DA) monitor synthesis and interface.
--- .../trace/rv/da_monitor_synthesis.rst | 286 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 286 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_synthesis.rst
Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_synthesis.rst new file +286 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@ +Deterministic Automata Monitor Synthesis +======================================== + +The starting point for the application of runtime verification (RV) technics is +the *specification* or *modeling* of the desired (or undesired) behavior of the +system under scrutiny. + +The formal representation needs to be then *synthesized* into a *monitor* that +can then be used in the analysis of the trace of the system. The *monitor* +conects to the system via an *instrumentation* layer, that converts the events +from the *system* to the events of the *specification*. + +This document introduces some concepts behind the **Deterministic Automata +(DA)** monitor synthesis. + +DA monitor synthesis in a nutshell +------------------------------------------------------ + +The synthesis of automata-based models into the Linux *RV monitor* abstraction +is automated by a tool named "dot2k", and the "rv/da_monitor.h" provided +by the RV interface. + +Given a file "wip.dot", representing a per-cpu monitor, with this content:: + + digraph state_automaton { + center = true; + size = "7,11"; + rankdir = LR; + {node [shape = circle] "non_preemptive"}; + {node [shape = plaintext, style=invis, label=""] "__init_preemptive"}; + {node [shape = doublecircle] "preemptive"}; + {node [shape = circle] "preemptive"}; + "__init_preemptive" -> "preemptive"; + "non_preemptive" [label = "non_preemptive"]; + "non_preemptive" -> "non_preemptive" [ label = "sched_waking" ]; + "non_preemptive" -> "preemptive" [ label = "preempt_enable" ]; + "preemptive" [label = "preemptive"]; + "preemptive" -> "non_preemptive" [ label = "preempt_disable" ]; + { rank = min ; + "__init_preemptive"; + "preemptive"; + } + } + +Run the dot2k tool with the model, specifying that it is a "per-cpu" +model:: + + $ dot2k -d ~/wip.dot -t per_cpu + +This will create a directory named "wip/" with the following files: + +- model.h: the wip in C +- wip.h: tracepoints that report the execution of the events by the + monitor +- wip.c: the RV monitor + +The following line in the "wip.c" file is responsible for the monitor +synthesis:: + + DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(wip, char); + +With that in place, the work left to be done is the *instrumentation* of +the monitor, which is already initialized by dot2k. + +DA: Introduction and representation formats +--------------------------------------------------------------- + +Formally, a deterministic automaton, denoted by G, is defined as a quintuple: + + *G* = { *X*, *E*, *f*, x\ :subscript:`0`, X\ :subscript:`m` } + +where: + +- *X* is the set of states; +- *E* is the finite set of events; +- x\ :subscript:`0` is the initial state; +- X\ :subscript:`m` (subset of *X*) is the set of marked states. +- *f* : *X* x *E* -> *X* $ is the transition function. It defines the state + transition in the occurrence of an event from *E* in the state *X*. In the + special case of deterministic automata, the occurrence of the event in *E* + in a state in *X* has a deterministic next state from *X*. + +One of the most evident benefits for the practical application of the automata +formalism is its *graphic representation*, represented using vertices (nodes) +and edges, which is very intuitive for *operating system* practitioners. + +For example, given an automata wip, with a regular representation of: + +- *X* = { ``preemptive``, ``non_preemptive``} +- *E* = { ``preempt_enable``, ``preempt_disable``, ``sched_waking``} +- x\ :subscript:`0` = ``preemptive`` +- X\ :subscript:`m` = {``preemptive``} +- *f* = + - *f*\ (``preemptive``, ``preempt_disable``) = ``non_preemptive`` + - *f*\ (``non_preemptive``, ``sched_waking``) = ``non_preemptive`` + - *f*\ (``non_preemptive``, ``preempt_enable``) = ``preemptive`` + + +It can also be represented in a graphic format, without any loss, using this +format:: + + preempt_enable + +---------------------------------+ + v | + #============# preempt_disable +------------------+ + --> H preemptive H -----------------> | non_preemptive | + #============# +------------------+ + ^ sched_waking | + +--------------+ + +The Graphviz open-source tool can produce this graphic format using the +(textual) DOT language as the source code. The DOT format is widely +used and can be converted to many other formats, including the ASCII art above. + +The dot2c tool presented in: + + DE OLIVEIRA, Daniel Bristot; CUCINOTTA, Tommaso; DE OLIVEIRA, Romulo + Silva. Efficient formal verification for the Linux kernel. In: + International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. + Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 315-332. + +Translates a deterministic automaton in the DOT format into a C source +code. For instance, using the wip model as input for dot2c results in +the following C representation:: + + enum states { + preemptive = 0, + non_preemptive, + state_max + }; + + enum events { + preempt_disable = 0, + preempt_enable, + sched_waking, + event_max + }; + + struct automaton { + char *state_names[state_max]; + char *event_names[event_max]; + char function[state_max][event_max]; + char initial_state; + char final_states[state_max]; + }; + + struct automaton aut = { + .state_names = { + "preemptive", + "non_preemptive" + }, + .event_names = { + "preempt_disable", + "preempt_enable", + "sched_waking" + }, + .function = { + { non_preemptive, -1, -1 }, + { -1, preemptive, non_preemptive }, + }, + .initial_state = preemptive, + .final_states = { 1, 0 }, + }; + +DA monitor synthesis for Linux +------------------------------ + +In Linux terms, the runtime verification monitors are encapsulated +inside the "RV monitor" abstraction. The "RV monitor" includes a set +of instances of the monitor (per-cpu monitor, per-task monitor, and +so on), the helper functions that glue the monitor to the system +reference model, and the trace output as a reaction for event parsing +and exceptions, as depicted below:: + + Linux +----- RV Monitor ----------------------------------+ Formal + Realm | | Realm + +-------------------+ +----------------+ +-----------------+ + | Linux kernel | | Monitor | | Reference | + | Tracing | -> | Instance(s) | <- | Model | + | (instrumentation) | | (verification) | | (specification) | + +-------------------+ +----------------+ +-----------------+ + | | | + | V | + | +----------+ | + | | Reaction | | + | +--+--+--+-+ | + | | | | | + | | | +-> trace output ? | + +------------------------|--|----------------------+ + | +----> panic ? + +-------> <user-specified> + + +The dot2c tool works connecting the *Reference Model* to the *RV Monitor* +abstraction by translating the *formal notation* into *code*. + +The "rv/da_monitor.h" header goes beyond dot2c, extending the code +generation to the verification stage, generating the code to the *Monitor +Instance(s)* level using C macros. The trace event code inspires this +approach. + +The benefits of the usage of macro for monitor synthesis is 3-fold: + +- Reduces the code duplication; +- Facilitates the bug fix/improvement; +- Avoids the case of developers changing the core of the monitor code + to manipulate the model in a (let's say) non-standard way. + +This initial implementation presents two different types of monitor instances: + +- ``#define DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(name, type)`` +- ``#define DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_TASK(name, type)`` + +The first declares the functions for deterministic automata monitor with +per-cpu instances, and the second with per-task instances. + +In both cases, the name is a string that identifies the monitor, and the type +is the data type used by dot2c/k on the representation of the model. + +For example, the "wip" model with two states and three events can be +stored in a "char" type. Considering that the preemption control is a +per-cpu behavior, the monitor declaration will be:: + + DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(wip, char); + +The monitor is executed by sending events to be processed via the functions +presented below:: + + da_handle_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)($(event from event enum)); + da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)($(event from event enum)); + +The function ``da_handle_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)()`` is the regular case, +while the function ``da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)()`` is a special +case used to synchronize the system with the model. + +When a monitor is enabled, it is placed in the initial state of the automata. +However, the monitor does not know if the system is in the *initial state*. +Hence, the monitor ignores events sent by sent by +``da_handle_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)()`` until the function +``da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)()`` is called. + +The function ``da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)()`` should be used for +the case in which the system generates the event is the one that returns +the automata to the initial state. + +After receiving a ``da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR_NAME)()`` event, the +monitor will know that it is in sync with the system and hence will +start processing the next events. + +Using the wip model as example, the events "preempt_disable" and +"sched_waking" should be sent to monitor, respectively, via:: + + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable); + da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking); + +While the event "preempt_enabled" will use:: + + da_handle_init_event_wip(preempt_enable); + +To notify the monitor that the system will be returning to the initial state, +so the system and the monitor should be in sync. + +rv/da_monitor.h +------------------------------------------- + +The "rv/da_monitor.h" is, mostly, a set of C macros that create function +definitions based on the paremeters passed via ``DECLARE_DA_MON_*``. + +In fewer words, the declaration of a monitor generates: + +- Helper functions for getting information from the automata model generated + by dot2k. +- Helper functions for the analysis of a deterministic automata model +- Functions for the initialization of the monitor instances +- The definition of the structure to store the monitor instances' data + +One important aspect is that the monitor does not call external functions +for the handling of the events sent by the instrumentation, except for +generating *tracing events* or *reactions*. + +Final remarks +------------- + +With the monitor synthesis in place using, the "rv/da_monitor.h" and +dot2k, the developer's work should be limited to the instrumentation +of the system, increasing the confidence in the overall approach.
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 16/20 Documentation/rv: Add deterministic automata instrumentation documentation
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdd the da_monitor_instrumentation.rst. It describes the basics of RV monitor instrumentation.
--- .../trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst | 223 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 223 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst
Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst new file +223 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +Deterministic Automata Instrumentation +======================================== + +This document introduces some concepts behind the **Deterministic Automata +(DA)** monitor instrumentation. + +The synthesis of automata-based models into the Linux *RV monitor* abstraction +is automated by a tool named dot2k, and the "rv/da_monitor.h" provided +by the RV interface. + +For example, given a file "wip.dot", representing a per-cpu monitor, with +this content:: + + digraph state_automaton { + center = true; + size = "7,11"; + rankdir = LR; + {node [shape = circle] "non_preemptive"}; + {node [shape = plaintext, style=invis, label=""] "__init_preemptive"}; + {node [shape = doublecircle] "preemptive"}; + {node [shape = circle] "preemptive"}; + "__init_preemptive" -> "preemptive"; + "non_preemptive" [label = "non_preemptive"]; + "non_preemptive" -> "non_preemptive" [ label = "sched_waking" ]; + "non_preemptive" -> "preemptive" [ label = "preempt_enable" ]; + "preemptive" [label = "preemptive"]; + "preemptive" -> "non_preemptive" [ label = "preempt_disable" ]; + { rank = min ; + "__init_preemptive"; + "preemptive"; + } + } + +That is the "DOT" representation of this automata model:: + + preempt_enable + +---------------------------------+ + v | + #============# preempt_disable +------------------+ + --> H preemptive H -----------------> | non_preemptive | + #============# +------------------+ + ^ sched_waking | + +--------------+ + + +Run the dot2k tool with the model, specifying that it is a "per-cpu" +model:: + + $ dot2k -d ~/wip.dot -t per_cpu + +This will create a directory named "wip/" with the following files: + +- model.h: the wip in C +- wip.h: tracepoints that report the execution of the events by the + monitor +- wip.c: the RV monitor + +The monitor instrumentation should be done entirely in the RV monitor, +in the example above, in the wip.c file. + +The RV monitor instrumentation section +-------------------------------------- + +The RV monitor file created by dot2k, with the name "$MODEL_NAME.c" +will include a section dedicated to instrumentation. + +In the example of the wip.dot above, it will look like:: + + /* + * This is the instrumentation part of the monitor. + * + * This is the section where manual work is required. Here the kernel events + * are translated into model's event. + * + */ + static void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable); + } + + static void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_enable); + } + + static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking); + } + + static int start_wip(void) + { + int retval; + + retval = da_monitor_init_wip(); + if (retval) + return retval; + + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); + + return 0; + } + +The comment at the top of the section explains the general idea: the +instrumentation section translates *kernel events* into the *events +accepted by the model*. + +Tracing callback functions +----------------------------- + +The first three functions are skeletons for callback *handler functions* for +each of the three events from the wip model. The developer does not +necessarily need to use them: they are just starting points. + +Using the example of:: + + void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable); + } + +The "preempt_disable" event from the model conects directly to the +"preemptirq:preempt_disable". The "preemptirq:preempt_disable" event +has the following signature, from "include/trace/events/preemptirq.h":: + + TP_PROTO(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) + +Hence, the "handle_preempt_disable()" function will look like:: + + void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) + +In this case, the kernel even translates one to one with the automata event, +and indeed, no other change is needed for this function. + +The next handler function, "handle_preempt_enable()" has the same argument +list from the "handle_preempt_disable()". The difference is that the +"preempt_enable" event will be used to synchronize the system to the model. + +Initially, the *model* is placed in the initial state. However, the *system* +might, or might not be in the initial state. The monitor cannot start +processing events until it knows that the system reached the initial state. +Otherwise the monitor and the system could be out-of-sync. + +Looking at the automata definition, it is possible to see that the system +and the model are expected to return to the initial state after the +"preempt_enable" execution. Hence, it can be used to synchronize the +system and the model at the initialization of the monitoring section. + +The initialization is informed via an special handle function, the +"da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR)(event)", in this case:: + + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable); + +So, the callback function will look like:: + + void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) + { + da_handle_init_event_wip(preempt_enable); + } + +Finally, the "handle_sched_waking()" will look like:: + + void handle_sched_waking(void *data, struct task_struct *task) + { + da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking); + } + +And the explanation is left for the reader as an exercise. + +Start and Stop functions +------------------------ + +dot2k automatically creates two special functions:: + + start_$MODELNAME() + stop_$MODELNAME() + +These functions are called when the monitor is enabled and disabled, +respectivelly. + +They should be used to *attach* and *detach* the instrumentation to the running +system. The developer must add to the relative function all that is needed to +*attach* and *detach* its monitor to the system. + +For the wip case, these functions were named:: + + start_wip() + stop_wip() + +But no change was required because: by default, these functions *attach* and +*detach* the tracepoints_to_attach, which was enough for this case. + +Instrumentation helpers +-------------------------- + +To complete the instrumentation, the *handler functions* need to be attached to a +kernel event, at the monitoring start phase. + +The RV interface also facilitates this step. For example, the macro "rv_attach_trace_probe()" +is used to connect the wip model events to the relative kernel event. dot2k automatically +adds "rv_attach_trace_probe()" function call for each model event in the start phase, as +a suggestion. + +For example, from the wip sample model:: + + static int start_wip(void) + { + int retval; + + retval = da_monitor_init_wip(); + if (retval) + return retval; + + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); + + return 0; + } + +The probes then need to be detached at the stop phase.
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 17/20 watchdog/dev: Add tracepoints
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdd a set of tracepoints, enabling the observability of the watchdog device interactions with user-space.
The events are:
watchdog:watchdog_open
watchdog:watchdog_close
watchdog:watchdog_start
watchdog:watchdog_stop
watchdog:watchdog_set_timeout
watchdog:watchdog_ping
watchdog:watchdog_nowayout
watchdog:watchdog_set_keep_alive
watchdog:watchdog_keep_alive
watchdog:watchdog_set_pretimeout
watchdog:watchdog_pretimeout
--- drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 43 ++++++++++- drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c | 2 + include/linux/watchdog.h | 7 +- include/trace/events/watchdog.h | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/trace/events/watchdog.h
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c +39 -4
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@#include <linux/watchdog.h> /* For watchdog specific items */ #include <linux/uaccess.h> /* For copy_to_user/put_user/... */ +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS +#include <trace/events/watchdog.h> +#include "watchdog_core.h" #include "watchdog_pretimeout.h"
@@ -130,9 +133,11 @@ static inline void watchdog_update_worker(struct watchdog_device *wdd)if (watchdog_need_worker (wdd)) {ktime_t t =watchdog_next_keepalive (wdd); -if (t >0 ) +if (t >0 ) {hrtimer_start (&wd_data->timer, t,HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD ); +trace_watchdog_set_keep_alive (wdd,ktime_to_ms (t)); + } }else {hrtimer_cancel (&wd_data->timer); }
@@ -141,7 +146,7 @@ static inline void watchdog_update_worker(struct watchdog_device *wdd)static int __watchdog_ping (struct watchdog_device *wdd) {struct watchdog_core_data *wd_data = wdd->wd_data; -ktime_t earliest_keepalive, now; +ktime_t earliest_keepalive, now, next_keepalive;int err; earliest_keepalive = ktime_add(wd_data->last_hw_keepalive,
@@ -149,14 +154,16 @@ static int __watchdog_ping(struct watchdog_device *wdd) now =ktime_get ();if (ktime_after (earliest_keepalive, now)) { -hrtimer_start (&wd_data->timer, -ktime_sub (earliest_keepalive, now), + next_keepalive =ktime_sub (earliest_keepalive, now); +hrtimer_start (&wd_data->timer, next_keepalive,HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD ); +trace_watchdog_set_keep_alive (wdd,ktime_to_ms (next_keepalive));return 0 ; } wd_data->last_hw_keepalive = now; +trace_watchdog_ping (wdd);if (wdd->ops->ping) err = wdd->ops->ping (wdd);/* ping the watchdog */ else
@@ -215,6 +222,7 @@ static void watchdog_ping_work(struct kthread_work *work) wd_data = container_of(work, struct watchdog_core_data, work);mutex_lock (&wd_data->lock); +trace_watchdog_keep_alive (wd_data->wdd);if (watchdog_worker_should_ping (wd_data))__watchdog_ping (wd_data->wdd);mutex_unlock (&wd_data->lock);
@@ -250,6 +258,8 @@ static int watchdog_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)set_bit (_WDOG_KEEPALIVE, &wd_data->status); +trace_watchdog_start (wdd); + started_at =ktime_get ();if (watchdog_hw_running (wdd) && wdd->ops->ping) { err =__watchdog_ping (wdd);
@@ -294,6 +304,7 @@ static int watchdog_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)return -EBUSY ; } +trace_watchdog_stop (wdd);if (wdd->ops->stop) {clear_bit (WDOG_HW_RUNNING , &wdd->status); err = wdd->ops->stop (wdd);
@@ -367,6 +378,7 @@ static int watchdog_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,if (watchdog_timeout_invalid (wdd, timeout))return -EINVAL ; +trace_watchdog_set_timeout (wdd, timeout);if (wdd->ops->set_timeout) { err = wdd->ops->set_timeout (wdd, timeout); }else {
@@ -399,6 +411,8 @@ static int watchdog_set_pretimeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,if (watchdog_pretimeout_invalid (wdd, timeout))return -EINVAL ; +trace_watchdog_set_pretimeout (wdd, timeout); +if (wdd->ops->set_pretimeout && (wdd->info->options &WDIOF_PRETIMEOUT )) err = wdd->ops->set_pretimeout (wdd, timeout);else
@@ -430,6 +444,23 @@ static int watchdog_get_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdd,return 0 ; } +/** +* watchdog_set_nowayout - set nowaout bit +* @wdd: The watchdog device to set nowayoutbit +* @nowayout A boolean on/off switcher +* +* If nowayout boolean is true, the nowayout option is set. No action is +* taken if nowayout is false. +*/ +void watchdog_set_nowayout (struct watchdog_device *wdd,bool nowayout) +{ +if (nowayout) { +set_bit (WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT , &wdd->status); +trace_watchdog_nowayout (wdd); + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (watchdog_set_nowayout); +#ifdef CONFIG_WATCHDOG_SYSFS static ssize_t nowayout_show (struct device *dev,struct device_attribute *attr,char *buf)
@@ -861,6 +892,8 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) goto out_clear; } +trace_watchdog_open (wdd); + err =watchdog_start (wdd);if (err <0 ) goto out_mod;
@@ -883,6 +916,7 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)return stream_open (inode, file); out_mod: +trace_watchdog_close (wdd);module_put (wd_data->wdd->ops->owner); out_clear:clear_bit (_WDOG_DEV_OPEN, &wd_data->status);
@@ -944,6 +978,7 @@ static int watchdog_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)/* make sure that /dev/watchdog can be re-opened */ clear_bit (_WDOG_DEV_OPEN, &wd_data->status); +trace_watchdog_close (wdd); done: running = wdd &&watchdog_hw_running (wdd);mutex_unlock (&wd_data->lock);
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c +2 -0
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@#include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/watchdog.h> +#include <trace/events/watchdog.h> #include "watchdog_core.h" #include "watchdog_pretimeout.h"
@@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ void watchdog_notify_pretimeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd)return ; } +trace_watchdog_pretimeout (wdd); wdd->gov->pretimeout (wdd);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pretimeout_lock, flags); }
include/linux/watchdog.h +1 -6
@@ -139,12 +139,7 @@ static inline bool watchdog_hw_running(struct watchdog_device *wdd)return test_bit (WDOG_HW_RUNNING , &wdd->status); } -/* Use the following function to set the nowayout feature */ -static inline void watchdog_set_nowayout (struct watchdog_device *wdd,bool nowayout) -{ -if (nowayout) -set_bit (WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT , &wdd->status); -} +void watchdog_set_nowayout (struct watchdog_device *wdd,bool nowayout);/* Use the following function to stop the watchdog on reboot */ static inline void watchdog_stop_on_reboot (struct watchdog_device *wdd)
include/trace/events/watchdog.h new file +101 -0
101 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 18/20 rv/monitor: Add safe watchdog monitor
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraThe watchdog is an essential building block for the usage of Linux in safety-critical systems because it allows the system to be monitored from an external element - the watchdog hardware, acting as a safety-monitor.
A user-space application controls the watchdog device via the watchdog interface. This application, hereafter safety_app, enables the watchdog and periodically pets the watchdog upon correct completion of the safety related processing.
If the safety_app, for any reason, stops pinging the watchdog, the watchdog hardware can set the system in a fail-safe state. For example, shutting the system down.
Given the importance of the safety_app / watchdog hardware couple, the interaction between these software pieces also needs some sort of monitoring. In other words, "who monitors the monitor?"
The safe watchdog (safe_wtd) RV monitor monitors the interaction between the safety_app and the watchdog device, enforcing the correct sequence of events that leads the system to a safe state.
Furthermore, the safety_app can monitor the RV monitor by collecting the events generated by the RV monitor itself via tracing interface. In this way, closing the monitoring loop with the safety_app.
To reach a safe state, the safe_wtd RV monitor requires the safety_app to:
- Open the watchdog device
- Start the watchdog
- Set a timeout
- ping at least once
The RV monitor also avoids some undesired actions. For example, to have other threads to touch the watchdog.
The monitor also has a set of options, enabled via kernel command line/module options. They are:
- watchdog_id: the device id to monitor (default 0).
- dont_stop: once enabled, do not allow the RV monitor to be stopped (default off);
- safe_timeout: define a maximum safe value that an user-space application can set as the watchdog timeout (default unlimited).
- check_timeout: After every ping, check if the time left in the watchdog is less than or equal to the last timeout set for the watchdog. It only works for watchdog devices that provide the get_timeleft() function (default off).
For further information, please refer to:
Documentation/trace/rv/watchdog-monitor.rst
The monitor specification was developed together with Gabriele Paoloni, in the context of the Linux Foundation Elisa Project.
--- kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 9 + kernel/trace/rv/Makefile | 1 + kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/model.h | 84 ++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.c | 302 ++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.h | 64 +++++ 5 files changed, 460 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/model.h create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.c create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.h
kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig +9 -0
@@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ config RV_MON_WWNR illustrates the usage of per-task monitor. The model is broken on purpose: it serves to test reactors. +config RV_MON_SAFE_WTD + bool "Safety watchdog" + help + Enable safe_wtd, this monitor observes the interaction + between a user-space safety monitor and a watchdog device. + + For futher information see: + Documentation/trace/rv/safety-monitor.rst + config RV_REACTORS bool "Runtime verification reactors" default y if RV
kernel/trace/rv/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RV) += rv.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WIP) += monitor_wip/wip.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_WWNR) += monitor_wwnr/wwnr.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RV_MON_SAFE_WTD) += monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACTORS) += rv_reactors.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACT_PRINTK) += reactor_printk.o obj-$(CONFIG_RV_REACT_PANIC) += reactor_panic.o
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/model.h new file +84 -0
85 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.c new file +302 -0
302 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/trace/rv/monitor_safe_wtd/safe_wtd.h new file +64 -0
64 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 19/20 rv/safety_app: Add an safety_app sample
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraThis is the sample code of a safety application that uses the watchdog as a safety monitor and the RV monitors to monitor this interaction/get feedback from kernel about the watchdog states.
This tool first creates a trace instance to follow the RV events and then enables RV monitor. After that, the tool configures the watchdog and starts running the main loop.
The main loop runs a use-case-specific function, like checking the system. If the system is running as expected, it pings the watchdog. After pinging the watchdog, the tool then collects trace information to see if the RV monitor received the expected events and is in a safe/safe_nwo state.
For further information, run safety_app --help
The safety-app specification was developed together with Gabriele Paoloni, in the context of the Linux Foundation Elisa Project.
--- tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/Makefile | 51 ++ tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/safety_app.c | 645 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 696 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/safety_app.c
tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/Makefile new file +51 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +NAME := safety_app +VERSION := 0.1 + +# From libtracefs: +# Makefiles suck: This macro sets a default value of $(2) for the +# variable named by $(1), unless the variable has been set by +# environment or command line. This is necessary for CC and AR +# because make sets default values, so the simpler ?= approach +# won't work as expected. +define allow-override + $(if $(or $(findstring environment,$(origin $(1))),\ + $(findstring command line,$(origin $(1)))),,\ + $(eval $(1) = $(2))) +endef + +# Allow setting CC and AR, or setting CROSS_COMPILE as a prefix. +$(call allow-override,CC,$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc) +$(call allow-override,AR,$(CROSS_COMPILE)ar) +$(call allow-override,STRIP,$(CROSS_COMPILE)strip) +$(call allow-override,PKG_CONFIG,pkg-config) +$(call allow-override,LD_SO_CONF_PATH,/etc/ld.so.conf.d/) +$(call allow-override,LDCONFIG,ldconfig) + +INSTALL = install +FOPTS := -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong \ + -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection +WOPTS := -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -Wno-maybe-uninitialized + +TRACEFS_HEADERS := $$($(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags libtracefs) + +CFLAGS := -O -g -DVERSION=\"$(VERSION)\" $(FOPTS) $(WOPTS) $(TRACEFS_HEADERS) +LDFLAGS := -ggdb +LIBS := $$($(PKG_CONFIG) --libs libtracefs) +FILES := Makefile +BINDIR := /usr/bin + +OBJ := $(NAME).o + +.PHONY: all +all: $(OBJ) + $(CC) -o $(NAME) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJ) $(LIBS) + +.PHONY: install +install: + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR) + $(INSTALL) $(NAME) -m 755 $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR) + $(STRIP) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)/$(NAME) + +.PHONY: clean +clean: + @rm -rf *~ $(OBJ) $(NAME)
tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/safety_app.c new file +645 -0
645 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
RFC v3 20/20 Documentation/rv: Add watchdog-monitor documentation
In reply to Daniel Bristot de OliveiraAdds documentation about the safe_wtd and safe_wtd_nwo RV monitors, and their usage via a safety application.
--- Documentation/trace/rv/watchdog-monitor.rst | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 250 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/watchdog-monitor.rst
Documentation/trace/rv/watchdog-monitor.rst new file +250 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@ +Watchdog monitor +---------------- + +The watchdog is an essential building block for the usage of Linux in +safety-critical systems because it allows the system to be monitored from +an external element - the watchdog hardware, acting as a safety-monitor. + +A user-space application controls the watchdog device via the watchdog +interface. This application, hereafter safety_app, enables the watchdog +and periodically pets the watchdog upon correct completion of the safety +related processing. + +If the safety_app, for any reason, stops pinging the watchdog, +the watchdog hardware can set the system in a fail-safe state. For +example, shutting the system down. + +Given the importance of the safety_app / watchdog hardware couple, +the interaction between these software pieces also needs some +sort of monitoring. In other words, "who monitors the monitor?" + +The safe watchdog (safe_wtd) RV monitor monitors the interaction between +the safety_app and the watchdog device, enforcing the correct sequence of +events that leads the system to a safe state. + +Furthermore, the safety_app can monitor the RV monitor by collecting the +events generated by the RV monitor itself via tracing interface. In this way, +closing the monitoring loop with the safety_app. + +A diagram of the components and their interactions is:: + + user-space: + +--------------------------------+ + | safety_app |-----------+ + +--------------------------------+ | + | ^ | + | Configure | Enable and | + | | check data | + ===================+====================+=============== | + kernel-space: | | | + v v | + +----------+ instr. +-------------+ | + | watchdog | ----------->| RV Monitor |----+ | + | device | +-------------+ | | + +----------+ | | + | | | + | | | + ================+====================================== | | + hardware: | | | + v | +-> Bring the system + +--------------------+ +----> to a safe state, + | watchdog hardware |---------------------------> e.g., halt. + +--------------------+ + +Sample safety_app +----------------- + +The user-space safety_app sample code in ``tools/tracing/rv/safety_app/`` +serves to illustrate the usage of the RV monitors for this use-case, as +well as the starting point to the development of a user-specific safety_app. + +Watchdog events +--------------- + +The RV monitor observes the watchdog by using instrumentation to +process the events generated by the interaction between the +safety_app and the watchdog device layer in kernel. + +The monitored events are: + + - watchdog:watchdog_open: open the watchdog device; + - watchdog:watchdog_close: close the watchdog device; + - watchdog:watchdog_start: start the watchdog; + - watchdog:watchdog_stop: stop the watchdog; + - watchdog:watchdog_set_timeout: set the watchdog timeout; + - watchdog:watchdog_ping: reprogram the watchdog with the previously set + timeout; + - watchdog:watchdog_nowayout: prevents the watchdog from stopping; + - watchdog:watchdog_set_keep_alive: set an intermediary ping to overcome + the limitation of a hardware watchdog maximum timeout being shorter than + the timeout set by the user-space tool; + - watchdog:watchdog_keep_alive: the execution of the function that runs the + intermediary keep alive ping; + +RV monitor events +----------------- + +The RV monitor monitors the relevant events as an outside observer, +interpreting all the components (the hardware; the watchdog device +interface; and the safety monitor) as an integrated component. + +The events selected for the monitor are: + + - other_threads: an event generated by any thread other than the + one that set nowayout or open the watchdog the last time. + - open: a thread opens the watchdog to manipulate it; + - close: a thread closes the watchdog; + - start: starts the watchdog countdown; + - stop: stops the watchdog; + - set_safe_timeout: configures the watchdog with a given timeout; + - ping: resets the watchdog countdown with the previously configured timeout; + - nowayout: prevents the watchdog to be stopped until the system's shutdown; + - sched_keep_alive: schedules a kernel worker to ping the watchdog if the + timeout is longer than the watchdog hardware can handle. + - keep_alive: executes the previously scheduled watchdog ping; + +Noting that the events that does not appear in the automata models are +considered blocked events, and their execution will always cause the +RV monitor to react to an unexpected event. + +RV monitor specification +------------------------ + +The monitor's goal is to assess a set of specifications that conducts the +system to a safe state. + +These specifications are: + + - 1: Once open, only one process manipulates the watchdog; + - 2: Following 1, the keep-alive mechanisms will not be used; + - 3: If required, nowayout will be set before opening the watchdog; + - 4: A safe timeout must be set; + - 5: At least one ping must be made before entering the safe/safe_nwo states + - 6: The RV monitor does not react if the watchdog is closed without stopping. + But the hardware watchdog is expected to react. + +Deterministic automata monitors +------------------------------- + +Following the specifications, a deterministic automata monitor +was developed. The monitor is modeled as Deterministic Automata model. + +The deterministic automata model for safe_wtd is:: + + #==================================# other_threads + H H ----------------+ + -----------> H init H | + H H <---------------+ + #==================================# + | | ^ + | | | close + | | +----------------------------------------------------+ + | | | + | | open | + | +------------------------------------------------------+ | + | | | + | nowayout | | + v | | + nowayout +-------------------+ | | + other_threads | | nowayout | | + +---------------- | nwo |<-------------------------------------+ | | + | | | | | | + +---------------> | | <+ | | | + +-------------------+ | | | | + | | | | | + | open | close | | | + v | | | | + +-------------------+ | | | | + | opened_nwo | -+ | | | + +-------------------+ | | | + | | | | + | start | | | + v | | | + +-------------------+ | | | + +---------------> | started_nwo | -+ | | | + | +-------------------+ | | | | + | | | | | | + | open | set_safe_timeout | | | | + | v | | | | + | +-------------------+ | | | | + | | set_nwo | | | | | + | +-------------------+ | | | | + | | | | | | + | +-------------+ | ping | | | | + | | | | | | | | + | | ping v v | | | | + | | +-------------------+ | | | | + | +-----------| safe_nwo | | | | | + | +-------------------+ | | | | + | | | | | | + | | close | close | | | + | v v | | | + | +----------------------------------+ nowayout | | | + | | | other_threads | | | + | | closed_running_nwo | ----------------+ | | | + | | | | | | | + +---------------- | | <---------------+ | | | + +----------------------------------+ | | | + | nowayout ^ | | | + +-----------------------------+ | | | + | | | + | | | + +-------------------+ +--------+ | | | + | | | |------+---+ | + | started | start | opened | | | + +---------------- | | <-------- | |>-----+-------+ + | +-------------------+ +--------+ | ^ + | | | | + | | set_safe_timeout +-------------+-------+ + | v | | + | +-------------------+ | | + | | | | | + | | set | | | + +----------+---------------> | | | | + | | +-------------------+ | | + | | | | | + | | | ping | | + | | v | | + | | +-------------------+ ping | | + | | | | -------+ | | + | | +---- | safe | | | | + | | | | | <------+ | | + | | | +-------------------+ | | + | | | | | | + | | stop | | stop | | + | | | v | | + | | | +-------------------+ close | | + | +-----------+---> | stopped |-------------+ | + | | +-------------------+ | + | +---+ | + | | close | + | v | + | other_threads +----------------------------------------+ | + | +--------------> | | | + | | | closed_running | | + | +--------------- | |--------------+ + | +----------------------------------------+ + | | ^ + | open | | close + | v | + | set_safe_timeout +-------------------+ + +-------------------------> | reopened | + +-------------------+ + +It is important to note that the events sched_keep_alive and keep_alive +are not allowed in the monitor (they are said to be blocked events). +The execution of any blocked events leads the RV monitor to react. + +Additional options +------------------ + +The RV monitor also has a set of options enabled via kernel command +line/module options. They are: + + - watchdog_id: the device id to monitor (default 0); + - dont_stop: once enabled, do not allow the RV monitor to be stopped (default off); + - safe_timeout: define a maximum safe value that a user-space application can + set as the watchdog timeout (default unlimited); + - check_timeout: After every ping, check if the time left in the watchdog is less + than or equal to the last timeout set for the watchdog. It only works for watchdog + devices that provide the get_timeleft() function (default off);
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1