Providing mount for memfd_restricted() syscall
Subsystems (7)
cover Providing mount for memfd_restricted() syscall
Hello,
This patchset builds upon the memfd_restricted() system call that has been discussed in the ‘KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM’ patch series, at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#m7e944d7892afdd1d62a03a287bd488c56e377b0c
The tree can be found at:
https://github.com/googleprodkernel/linux-cc/tree/restrictedmem-provide-mount-path
In this patchset, a modification to the memfd_restricted() syscall is proposed, which allows userspace to provide a mount, on which the file will be created and returned from the memfd_restricted().
Allowing userspace to provide a mount allows userspace to control various memory binding policies via tmpfs mount options, such as Transparent HugePage memory allocation policy through ‘huge=always/never’ and NUMA memory allocation policy through ‘mpol=local/bind:*’.
Dependencies:
+ Sean’s iteration of the ‘KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting
KVM’ patch series at
https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/tree/x86/upm_base_support
+ Proposed fixes for these issues mentioned on the mailing list:
+ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Future work/TODOs:
+ man page for the memfd_restricted() syscall
+ Support for per file Transparent HugePage allocation hints
+ Support for per file NUMA binding hints
Ackerley Tng (2):
mm: restrictedmem: Allow userspace to specify mount_path for
memfd_restricted
selftests: restrictedmem: Check hugepage-ness of shmem file backing
restrictedmem fd
include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h | 8 + mm/restrictedmem.c | 63 +++- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/restrictedmem/.gitignore | 3 + .../testing/selftests/restrictedmem/Makefile | 14 + .../testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.c | 9 + .../testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.h | 8 + .../restrictedmem_hugepage_test.c | 344 ++++++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/restrictedmem_hugepage_test.c
--
2.39.1.637.g21b0678d19-goog
RFC PATCH 1/2 mm: restrictedmem: Allow userspace to specify mount_path for memfd_restricted
By default, the backing shmem file for a restrictedmem fd is created on shmem's kernel space mount.
With this patch, an optional tmpfs mount can be specified, which will be used as the mountpoint for backing the shmem file associated with a restrictedmem fd.
This change is modeled after how sys_open() can create an unnamed temporary file in a given directory with O_TMPFILE.
This will help restrictedmem fds inherit the properties of the provided tmpfs mounts, for example, hugepage allocation hints, NUMA binding hints, etc.
--- include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h | 8 ++++ mm/restrictedmem.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h
include/linux/syscalls.h +1 -1
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags);asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy_home_node (unsigned long start,unsigned long len,unsigned long home_node,unsigned long flags); -asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags); +asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags,const char __user *mount_path);/* * Architecture-specific system calls
include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_RESTRICTEDMEM_H +#define _UAPI_LINUX_RESTRICTEDMEM_H + +/* flags for memfd_restricted */ +#define RMFD_TMPFILE 0x0001U + +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_RESTRICTEDMEM_H */
mm/restrictedmem.c +57 -6
93 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1.637.g21b0678d19-goog
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: restrictedmem: Allow userspace to specify mount_path for memfd_restricted
Quoted 27 lines · Ackerley Tng
By default, the backing shmem file for a restrictedmem fd is created on shmem's kernel space mount.
With this patch, an optional tmpfs mount can be specified, which will be used as the mountpoint for backing the shmem file associated with a restrictedmem fd.
This change is modeled after how
sys_open()can create an unnamed temporary file in a given directory withO_TMPFILE.This will help restrictedmem fds inherit the properties of the provided tmpfs mounts, for example, hugepage allocation hints, NUMA binding hints, etc.
Signed-off-by Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>--- include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h | 8 ++++ mm/restrictedmem.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.hinclude/linux/syscalls.h +0
-0
include/linux/syscalls.h asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags); · line 1062
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/syscalls.h +1
-1@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags);asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy_home_node (unsigned long start,unsigned long len,unsigned long home_node,unsigned long flags); -asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags); +asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags,const char __user *mount_path);/* * Architecture-specific system calls
I'm not sure what the right practice now: do we provide string that contains mount path or fd that represents the filesystem (returned from fsmount(2) or open_tree(2)).
fd seems more flexible: it allows to specify unbind mounts.
Signature · 1 line
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: restrictedmem: Allow userspace to specify mount_path for memfd_restricted
Quoted 37 lines · Kirill A. Shutemov
Quoted 35 lines · Ackerley Tng
By default, the backing shmem file for a restrictedmem fd is created on shmem's kernel space mount.
With this patch, an optional tmpfs mount can be specified, which will be used as the mountpoint for backing the shmem file associated with a restrictedmem fd.
This change is modeled after how
sys_open()can create an unnamed temporary file in a given directory withO_TMPFILE.This will help restrictedmem fds inherit the properties of the provided tmpfs mounts, for example, hugepage allocation hints, NUMA binding hints, etc.
Signed-off-by Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>--- include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h | 8 ++++ mm/restrictedmem.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)create mode 100644
include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.hinclude/linux/syscalls.h +1
-1@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags);asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy_home_node (unsigned long start,unsigned long len,unsigned long home_node,unsigned long flags); -asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags); +asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags,const char __user *mount_path);
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
/*
* Architecture-specific system callsI'm not sure what the right practice now: do we provide string that contains mount path or fd that represents the filesystem (returned from fsmount(2) or
open_tree(2)).fd seems more flexible: it allows to specify unbind mounts.
I tried out the suggestion of passing fds to memfd_restricted() instead of strings.
One benefit I see of using fds is interface uniformity: it feels more aligned with other syscalls like fsopen(), fsconfig(), and fsmount() in terms of using and passing around fds.
Other than being able to use a mount without a path attached to the mount, are there any other benefits of using fds over using the path string?
Should I post the patches that allows specifying a mount using fds? Should I post them as a separate RFC, or as a new revision to this RFC?
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: restrictedmem: Allow userspace to specify mount_path for memfd_restricted
Quoted 52 lines · Ackerley Tng
Quoted 37 lines · Kirill A. Shutemov
Quoted 35 lines · Ackerley Tng
By default, the backing shmem file for a restrictedmem fd is created on shmem's kernel space mount.
With this patch, an optional tmpfs mount can be specified, which will be used as the mountpoint for backing the shmem file associated with a restrictedmem fd.
This change is modeled after how
sys_open()can create an unnamed temporary file in a given directory withO_TMPFILE.This will help restrictedmem fds inherit the properties of the provided tmpfs mounts, for example, hugepage allocation hints, NUMA binding hints, etc.
Signed-off-by Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>--- include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.h | 8 ++++ mm/restrictedmem.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)create mode 100644
include/uapi/linux/restrictedmem.hinclude/linux/syscalls.h +1
-1@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags);asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy_home_node (unsigned long start,unsigned long len,unsigned long home_node,unsigned long flags); -asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags); +asmlinkage long sys_memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags,const char __user *mount_path);Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
/*
* Architecture-specific system callsI'm not sure what the right practice now: do we provide string that contains mount path or fd that represents the filesystem (returned from fsmount(2) or
open_tree(2)).fd seems more flexible: it allows to specify unbind mounts.
I tried out the suggestion of passing fds to
memfd_restricted()instead of strings.
Quoted 6 lines
One benefit I see of using fds is interface uniformity: it feels more aligned with other syscalls like
fsopen(),fsconfig(), andfsmount()in terms of using and passing around fds.Other than being able to use a mount without a path attached to the mount, are there any other benefits of using fds over using the path string?
It would be nice if anyone from fs folks comment on this.
Quoted 2 lines
Should I post the patches that allows specifying a mount using fds? Should I post them as a separate RFC, or as a new revision to this RFC?
Let's first decide what the right direction is.
Signature · 1 line
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
RFC PATCH 2/2 selftests: restrictedmem: Check hugepage-ness of shmem file backing restrictedmem fd
In reply to Ackerley TngFor memfd_restricted() calls without a userspace mount, the backing file should be the shmem mount in the kernel, and the size of backing pages should be as defined by system-wide shmem configuration.
If a userspace mount is provided, the size of backing pages should be as defined in the mount.
--- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/restrictedmem/.gitignore | 3 + .../testing/selftests/restrictedmem/Makefile | 14 + .../testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.c | 9 + .../testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.h | 8 + .../restrictedmem_hugepage_test.c | 344 ++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 379 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/restrictedmem_hugepage_test.c
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ TARGETS += pstore TARGETS += ptrace TARGETS += openat2 TARGETS += resctrl +TARGETS += restrictedmem TARGETS += rlimits TARGETS += rseq TARGETS += rtc
tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/.gitignore new file +3 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +restrictedmem_hugepage_test
tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/Makefile new file +14 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +CFLAGS = $(KHDR_INCLUDES) + +TEST_GEN_PROGS += restrictedmem_hugepage_test + +include ../lib.mk + +EXTRA_CLEAN = $(OUTPUT)/common.o + +$(OUTPUT)/common.o: common.c + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH) -c -ffreestanding $< -o $@ + +$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): $(OUTPUT)/common.o
tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.c new file +9 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +#include <sys/syscall.h> +#include <unistd.h> + +int memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags,char *mount_path) +{ +return syscall (__NR_memfd_restricted, flags, mount_path); +}
tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/common.h new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ + +#ifndef SELFTESTS_RESTRICTEDMEM_COMMON_H +#define SELFTESTS_RESTRICTEDMEM_COMMON_H + +int memfd_restricted (unsigned int flags,char *mount_path); + +#endif // SELFTESTS_RESTRICTEDMEM_COMMON_H
tools/testing/selftests/restrictedmem/restrictedmem_hugepage_test.c new file +344 -0
344 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.39.1.637.g21b0678d19-goog