clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug and add bounds-checking coverage
Subsystems (2)
cover clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug and add bounds-checking coverage
This small series aims to fix an undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider and add bounds-checking coverage at run-time for flexible-array member hws in struct clk_hw_onecell_data when accessed throught struct visconti_pll_provider.
Gustavo A. R. Silva (2):
clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct
visconti_pll_provider
clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct
visconti_pll_provider
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c | 6 +++--- drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
PATCH 1/2 clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider
struct clk_hw_onecell_data is a flexible structure, which means that it contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case array hws:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
1383 };
This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following clk_data in struct visconti_pll_provider, in this case struct device_node *node;, at run-time:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
17 void __iomem *reg_base; 18 struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; 19 struct device_node *node;
20 };
Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array hws at line 328. See below:
include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
14 #define TMPV770X_NR_PLL 7
drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
69 ctx = visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
321 struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node *np,
322 void __iomem *base,
323 unsigned long nr_plls)
324 {
325 struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
...
328 ctx = kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls), GFP_KERNEL);
struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls) above translates to sizeof(struct visconti_pll_provider) + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * 7 == 24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56
^^^^ | allocated bytes for flex array `hws`
$ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o
struct visconti_pll_provider {
void * reg_base; /* 0 8 */
struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; /* 8 8 */
struct device_node * node; /* 16 8 *//* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ };
And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members of struct visconti_pll_provider:
332 for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
333 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
334
335 ctx->node = np; 336 ctx->reg_base = base; 337 ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;
Fix all these by placing the declaration of object clk_data at the end of struct visconti_pll_provider. Also, add a comment to make it clear that this object must always be last in the structure, and prevent this bug from being introduced again in the future.
--- drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h +3 -1
@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@struct visconti_pll_provider {void __iomem *reg_base; -struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;struct device_node *node; + +/* Must be last */ +struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; }; #define VISCONTI_PLL_RATE(_rate, _dacen, _dsmen, \
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider
Quoted 66 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
struct clk_hw_onecell_datais a flexible structure, which means that it contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case arrayhws:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 structclk_hw_onecell_data{
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 structclk_hw*hws[]__counted_by(num);
1383 };This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following
clk_datainstruct visconti_pll_provider, in this casestruct device_node *node;, at run-time:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 structvisconti_pll_provider{17 void __iomem *reg_base; 18 struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; 19 struct device_node *node;20 };
Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array
hwsat line 328. See below:
include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
14 #defineTMPV770X_NR_PLL7
drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
69 ctx =visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
321 structvisconti_pll_provider*__initvisconti_init_pll(structdevice_node*np,
322 void__iomem*base,
323 unsigned longnr_plls)
324 {
325 structvisconti_pll_provider*ctx;
...
328 ctx =kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls), GFP_KERNEL);
struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls)above translates tosizeof(struct visconti_pll_provider)+sizeof(struct clk_hw *)* 7 == 24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56^^^^ | allocated bytes for flex array `hws`$ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o struct visconti_pll_provider { void * reg_base; /* 0 8 */ struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; /* 8 8 */ struct device_node * node; /* 16 8 *//* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ };And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members of
struct visconti_pll_provider:332 for (i = 0; i <
nr_plls; ++i)
333 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] =ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
334335 ctx->node = np; 336 ctx->reg_base = base; 337 ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;
Quoted 8 lines
Fix all these by placing the declaration of object
clk_dataat the end ofstruct visconti_pll_provider. Also, add a comment to make it clear that this object must always be last in the structure, and prevent this bug from being introduced again in the future.Fixes b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver")Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Another good catch. :)
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
RE: [PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider
In reply to Gustavo A. R. SilvaHi Gustavo A. R. Silva,
Thanks for your patch!
Quoted 87 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 11:18 AM
To: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>; Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>; iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○DITC□DIT○O
ST) <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in structvisconti_pll_provider
struct clk_hw_onecell_datais a flexible structure, which means that it contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case arrayhws:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 structclk_hw_onecell_data{
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 structclk_hw*hws[]__counted_by(num);
1383 };This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following
clk_datainstruct visconti_pll_provider, in this casestruct device_node *node;, at run-time:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 structvisconti_pll_provider{17 void __iomem *reg_base; 18 struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; 19 struct device_node *node;20 };
Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array
hwsat line 328. See below:
include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
14 #defineTMPV770X_NR_PLL7
drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
69 ctx =visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
321 structvisconti_pll_provider*__initvisconti_init_pll(structdevice_node*np,
322 void__iomem
*base,
323 unsigned longnr_plls)
324 {
325 structvisconti_pll_provider*ctx;
...
328 ctx = kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws,nr_plls),GFP_KERNEL);
struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls)above translates tosizeof(struct visconti_pll_provider)+sizeof(struct clk_hw *)* 7 ==
24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56^^^^ | allocated bytes for flex array `hws`$ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o struct visconti_pll_provider { void * reg_base; /* 0 8 */ struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; /* 8 8 */ struct device_node * node; /* 16 8 *//* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ };And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members of
struct visconti_pll_provider:332 for (i = 0; i <
nr_plls; ++i)
333 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] =ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
334335 ctx->node = np; 336 ctx->reg_base = base; 337 ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;Fix all these by placing the declaration of object
clk_dataat the end ofstruct visconti_pll_provider. Also, add a comment to make it clear that this object must always be last in the structure, and prevent this bug from being introduced again in the future.
Quoted 4 lines
Fixes b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver andreset driver")
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH 2/2 clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct visconti_pll_provider
In reply to Gustavo A. R. SilvaIn order to gain the bounds-checking coverage that __counted_by provides to flexible-array members at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions), we must make sure that the counter member, in this particular case num, is updated before the first access to the flex-array member, in this particular case array hws. See below:
commit f316cdff8d67 ("clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with __counted_by") introduced __counted_by for struct clk_hw_onecell_data together with changes to relocate some of assignments of counter num before hws is accessed:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
1383 };
However, this structure is used as a member in other structs, in this case in struct visconti_pll_provider:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
17 void __iomem *reg_base;
18 struct device_node *node;
19
20 /* Must be last */
21 struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
22 };
Hence, we need to move the assignments to ctx->clk_data.num after allocation for struct visconti_pll_provider and before accessing the flexible array ctx->clk_data.hws. And, as assignments for all members in struct visconti_pll_provider are originally adjacent to each other, relocate all assignments together, so we don't split up ctx->clk_data.hws = nr_plls from the rest. :)
--- drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c +3 -3
@@ -329,12 +329,12 @@ struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node *np,if (!ctx)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); -for (i =0 ; i < nr_plls; ++i) - ctx->clk_data.hws[i] =ERR_PTR (-ENOENT ); - ctx->node = np; ctx->reg_base = base; ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls; +for (i =0 ; i < nr_plls; ++i) + ctx->clk_data.hws[i] =ERR_PTR (-ENOENT ); +return ctx; }
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct visconti_pll_provider
Quoted 30 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
In order to gain the bounds-checking coverage that
__counted_byprovides to flexible-array members at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions), we must make sure that the counter member, in this particular casenum, is updated before the first access to the flex-array member, in this particular case arrayhws. See below:commit
f316cdff8d67("clk: Annotate structclk_hw_onecell_datawith__counted_by") introduced__counted_byforstruct clk_hw_onecell_datatogether with changes to relocate some of assignments of counternumbeforehwsis accessed:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 structclk_hw_onecell_data{
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 structclk_hw*hws[]__counted_by(num);
1383 };However, this structure is used as a member in other structs, in this case in
struct visconti_pll_provider:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 structvisconti_pll_provider{
17 void__iomem*reg_base;
18 structdevice_node*node;
19
20 /* Must be last */
21 structclk_hw_onecell_dataclk_data;
22 };
Quoted 8 lines
Hence, we need to move the assignments to
ctx->clk_data.numafter allocation forstruct visconti_pll_providerand before accessing the flexible arrayctx->clk_data.hws. And, as assignments for all members instruct visconti_pll_providerare originally adjacent to each other, relocate all assignments together, so we don't split upctx->clk_data.hws = nr_pllsfrom the rest. :)Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Looks good; thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
RE: [PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct visconti_pll_provider
In reply to Gustavo A. R. SilvaHi Gustavo A. R. Silva,
Thanks for your patch!
Quoted 42 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 11:19 AM
To: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>; Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>; iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○DITC□DIT○O
ST) <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for structvisconti_pll_providerIn order to gain the bounds-checking coverage that
__counted_byprovides to flexible-array members at run-time viaCONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS(for array indexing) andCONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE(for strcpy/memcpy-family functions), we must make sure that the counter member, in this particular casenum, is updated before the first access to the flex-array member, in this particular case arrayhws. See below:commit
f316cdff8d67("clk: Annotate structclk_hw_onecell_datawith__counted_by") introduced__counted_byforstruct clk_hw_onecell_datatogether with changes to relocate some of assignments of counternumbeforehwsis accessed:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 structclk_hw_onecell_data{
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 structclk_hw*hws[]__counted_by(num);
1383 };However, this structure is used as a member in other structs, in this case in
struct visconti_pll_provider:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 structvisconti_pll_provider{
17 void__iomem*reg_base;
18 structdevice_node*node;
19
20 /* Must be last */
21 structclk_hw_onecell_dataclk_data;
22 };
Quoted 8 lines
Hence, we need to move the assignments to
ctx->clk_data.numafter allocation forstruct visconti_pll_providerand before accessing the flexible arrayctx->clk_data.hws. And, as assignments for all members instruct visconti_pll_providerare originally adjacent to each other, relocate all assignments together, so we don't split upctx->clk_data.hws = nr_pllsfrom the rest. :)Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel