KVM: PPC: Misc fixes and nestedv2 vCPU limit fixes
Subsystems (3)
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerv2 cover KVM: PPC: Misc fixes and nestedv2 vCPU limit fixes
RFC -> v2:
=========
- Addressed sashiko review comments
- added patch-3 to address similar __ffs(0) problem on booke
- fixed build issues in patch-4
- added patch-5 to reject vcpu ids beyond the PAPR limit
- Few more patches were added. Few of them were reported by Sashiko and few others were caught while doing vcpu create path code walkthrough
Most of these issues were identified while adding kvm powerpc selftests infrastructure support [1] (which is now merged upstream). Patch-1 and Patch-2 were identified while running the selftests on Qemu+TCG+powernv+BE, while Patch-4 can also be reproduced on a real pseries LPAR with nestedv2 capabilities.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/179211526968.809012.4905747914183363587.b4-ty@b4/
[RFC]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/[email protected]/
Ritesh Harjani (IBM) (7):
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Read EX_DSISR as a 32-bit field on guest exit
KVM: PPC: Book3S: Don't call __ffs() on an empty pending_exceptions bitmap
KVM: PPC: BookE: Don't call __ffs() on an empty pending_exceptions bitmap
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: cap max vcpus to PAPR limit
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: reject vCPU ids beyond the PAPR limit
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix error handling during vcore create
KVM: PPC: Book3s: nestedv2: Free the guest state buffers if vcpu create fails
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 15 ++++++++++----- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_p9_entry.c | 13 +++++++++++-- arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 9 +++++++++ 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.39.5
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 1/7 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Read EX_DSISR as a 32-bit field on guest exit
kvmhv_vcpu_entry_p9() recovers the guest fault state from the paca exception save area with
vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr = exsave[EX_DSISR/sizeof(u64)];
but EX_DSISR is not a doubleword. It is a 32-bit field at offset 48 that shares a doubleword with EX_CCR at offset 52 and the exception entry in exceptions-64s.S stores it accordingly. For e.g.
stw r10,IAREA+EX_DSISR(r13)
This issue was caught when running kvm selftests on big-endian, where this read would land in the high half and the truncation yields EX_CCR instead - KVM acts on the guest's condition register as if it were HDSISR.
The result is that every HDSI on a big-endian host is evaluated against a bogus fault status i.e. it fails with below error:
KVM: Got radix HV page fault with DSISR=84004840
Let's fix this by reading this field at it's natural width.
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_p9_entry.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_p9_entry.c +11 -2
@@ -529,6 +529,15 @@ unsigned long kvmppc_msr_hard_disable_set_facilities(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsi }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kvmppc_msr_hard_disable_set_facilities); +/* +* EX_DSISR is a 32-bit field that shares a doubleword with EX_CCR. +* Small helper for reading it back at its natural width. +*/ +static u32 exsave_dsisr (u64 *exsave) +{ +return *(u32 *)((void *)exsave +EX_DSISR ); +} +int kvmhv_vcpu_entry_p9 (struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,u64 time_limit,unsigned long lpcr,u64 *tb) {struct p9_host_os_sprs host_os_sprs;
@@ -770,7 +779,7 @@ int kvmhv_vcpu_entry_p9(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 time_limit, unsigned long lpcif (unlikely (trap ==BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK )) { vcpu->arch.fault_dar = exsave[EX_DAR /sizeof (u64)]; - vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr = exsave[EX_DSISR /sizeof (u64)]; + vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr =exsave_dsisr (exsave);kvmppc_realmode_machine_check (vcpu); }else if (unlikely (trap ==BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_HMI )) {
@@ -781,7 +790,7 @@ int kvmhv_vcpu_entry_p9(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 time_limit, unsigned long lpc }else if (trap ==BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_DATA_STORAGE ) { vcpu->arch.fault_dar = exsave[EX_DAR /sizeof (u64)]; - vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr = exsave[EX_DSISR /sizeof (u64)]; + vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr =exsave_dsisr (exsave); vcpu->arch.fault_gpa =mfspr (SPRN_ASDR ); }else if (trap ==BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_INST_STORAGE ) {
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 2/7 KVM: PPC: Book3S: Don't call __ffs() on an empty pending_exceptions bitmap
In reply to Ritesh Harjani (IBM)This problem was caught when running KVM PPC selftests on big-endian. __ffs() doc clearly says:
"Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first"
This cause KVM to deliever an arbitrary interrupt to the guest and was causing guest to hang up while running these selftests.
On checking further - GCC was emitting 0 in this case, which caused System Reset in guest while running kvm selftests.
Use find_first_bit() instead, which reads the word once and returns the bitmap size when no bit is set, instead of reading *pending twice thereby causing TOCTOU as pointed by Sashiko.
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c +1 -1
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions)printk (KERN_EMERG "KVM: Check pending: %lx\n" , vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions);#endif - priority =__ffs (*pending); + priority =find_first_bit (pending,BITS_PER_LONG *sizeof (*pending));while (priority <BOOK3S_IRQPRIO_MAX ) {if (kvmppc_book3s_irqprio_deliver (vcpu, priority) &&clear_irqprio (vcpu, priority)) {
--
2.39.5
[email protected]
AI reviewRe: [PATCHv2 2/7] KVM: PPC: Book3S: Don't call __ffs() on an empty pending_exceptions bitmap
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] KVM: PPC: Book3S: out-of-bounds read in kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter() --
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM: PPC: Book3S: out-of-bounds read in kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter() --
commit 05f5afe597ebfa07475ccb012aebebd6487a463b
Author: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
KVM: PPC: Book3S: Don't call __ffs() on an empty pending_exceptions bitmap
This commit replaces __ffs(*pending) with find_first_bit() in kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter() so that an empty pending_exceptions bitmap does not invoke undefined behavior and deliver a bogus interrupt to the guest.
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c int kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) · line 404
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c +1
-1@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions)printk (KERN_EMERG "KVM: Check pending: %lx\n" , vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions);#endif - priority =__ffs (*pending); + priority =find_first_bit (pending,BITS_PER_LONG *sizeof (*pending));
[Severity: High]
Does passing BITS_PER_LONG * sizeof(*pending) as the bit size to find_first_bit() in kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter() (in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c) cause an out-of-bounds read past vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions when no exceptions are pending?
vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions is a single unsigned long in struct kvm_vcpu_arch (arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h):
unsigned long pending_exceptions;
Because BITS_PER_LONG is already the number of bits in an unsigned long and sizeof(*pending) is the byte size, BITS_PER_LONG * sizeof(*pending) evaluates to 512 bits (8 unsigned longs) on 64-bit PowerPC or 128 bits (4 unsigned longs) on 32-bit PowerPC.
Since that size exceeds BITS_PER_LONG, small_const_nbits(size) in find_first_bit() (include/linux/find.h) evaluates to false and calls _find_first_bit() in lib/find_bit.c, which iterates across multiple words and reads pending[1..7] (or pending[1..3]) out of bounds into adjacent fields of struct kvm_vcpu_arch whenever vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions is 0.
Note that the find_next_bit() call later in the same loop uses BITS_PER_BYTE:
priority = find_next_bit(pending,
BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(*pending), priority + 1);
Should find_first_bit() use BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(*pending) (or simply BITS_PER_LONG) here as well?
Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/b985cc12b0ed62599815ddf87e612bc8b6b2813c.1793543627.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com?part=1
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 3/7 KVM: PPC: BookE: Don't call __ffs() on an empty pending_exceptions bitmap
In reply to Ritesh Harjani (IBM)kvmppc_core_check_exceptions() has the same pattern as the Book3S code:
it starts the scan of the pending exception bitmap with __ffs(*pending) and is called from kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter() on every guest entry, so it routinely passes 0 to __ffs(), which is undefined.
To be safe here, let's use find_first_bit(), which returns the bitmap size when no bit is set.
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c +1 -1
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void kvmppc_core_check_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)unsigned long *pending = &vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions;unsigned int priority; - priority =__ffs (*pending); + priority =find_first_bit (pending,BITS_PER_BYTE *sizeof (*pending));while (priority <BOOKE_IRQPRIO_MAX ) {if (kvmppc_booke_irqprio_deliver (vcpu, priority))break ;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 4/7 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: cap max vcpus to PAPR limit
In reply to Ritesh Harjani (IBM)PAPR spec for H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU says:
"Only 2048 VCPUs can be created, and the specified ID must be in the range of 0
to 2047"
However, KVM reports KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS as NR_CPUS and KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID as 8 * NR_CPUS. It also passes the userspace vCPU id through to the hcall unchanged. On a nestedv2 host (KVM on PowerVM / pseries nested PAPR) built with NR_CPUS > 2048, kvm selftest e.g. kvm_create_max_vcpus will create vCPU 2048 and fail with EINVAL when the hypervisor returns H_P3.
Following error gets reported (with a debug print added to selftest to print failed vcpu_id number):
./kvm_create_max_vcpus
Random seed: 0x6ec3f539
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: 65536
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: 8192
Testing creating 8192 vCPUs, with IDs 0...8191.
[ 62.655458][ T302] KVM: Create Guest vcpu hcall failed, rc=-56
[ 62.655458][ T302] KVM: Create Guest vcpu hcall failed, rc=-56
Failed KVM_CREATE_VCPU for vcpu_id 2048 with errno 22
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
lib/kvm_util.c:1395: vcpu->fd >= 0
pid=302 tid=302 errno=22 - Invalid argument
1 0x00000000100061d3: __vm_vcpu_add at kvm_util.c:1395 (discriminator 6)
2 0x0000000010001a6b: test_vcpu_creation at kvm_create_max_vcpus.c:32 (discriminator 3)
3 0x000000001000160b: main at kvm_create_max_vcpus.c:59
4 0x000000001001b713: __libc_start_call_main at libc-start.o:?
5 0x000000001001bb47: __libc_start_main_impl at ??:?
KVM_CREATE_VCPU failed, rc: -1 errno: 22 (Invalid argument)
[ 65.316986][ T302] KVM: TLB LPID invalidation hcall failed, rc=-2
[ 65.316986][ T302] KVM: TLB LPID invalidation hcall failed, rc=-2Cap both extensions at 2048 when kvmhv_is_nestedv2() is set, so userspace never requests an id the L0 cannot create. PowerNV and nestedv1 are unchanged. The issue is only seen with nestedv2. While at it, this also fixes the limit for KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS.
--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h +1 -0
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS NR_CPUS#define KVM_MAX_VCORES NR_CPUS +#define KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2 2048/* PAPR H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU vcpuId */ #include <asm/cputhreads.h>
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c +6 -0
@@ -663,12 +663,18 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) r =min (num_present_cpus (),KVM_MAX_VCPUS ); else r =min (num_online_cpus (),KVM_MAX_VCPUS ); +if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2 ()) + r =min (r, KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2);break ;case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS : r =KVM_MAX_VCPUS ; +if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2 ()) + r =min (r, KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2);break ;case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID : r =KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS ; +if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2 ()) + r =min (r, KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2);break ;#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 case KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO :
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 5/7 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: reject vCPU ids beyond the PAPR limit
In reply to Ritesh Harjani (IBM)The previous patch caps KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID at 2048 on nestedv2 but nothing actually enforces it. The generic KVM_CREATE_VCPU path only checks the id against KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS, which is 8 * NR_CPUS on HV. That means a VMM that ignores the capability can still pass a larger id. That id goes all the way down to H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU, where the L0 rejects it and prints, ...
KVM: Create Guest vcpu hcall failed, rc=-56
...for every such attempt before failing the ioctl with -EINVAL anyway.
Check the id in kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() instead so it fails early with the same -EINVAL. Note that PowerNV and nestedv1 are not affected.
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c +3 -0
@@ -778,6 +778,9 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,int kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate (struct kvm *kvm,unsigned int id) { +if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2 () && id >= KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2) +return -EINVAL ; +return 0 ; }
--
2.39.5
[email protected]
AI reviewRe: [PATCHv2 5/7] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: reject vCPU ids beyond the PAPR limit
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] KVM: PPC: undeclared KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2 in kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() --
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] KVM: PPC: undeclared KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2 in kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() --
commit f56e9e3141b7693c524f0cc29414b94ab8a0b784
Author: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: reject vCPU ids beyond the PAPR limit
This commit adds a check in kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() on Book3S HV nestedv2 to reject vCPU IDs at or above KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2 with -EINVAL before reaching the H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU hcall.
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, · line 776
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c +2
-0@@ -772,6 +772,9 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,int kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate (struct kvm *kvm,unsigned int id) { +if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2 () && id >= KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2) +return -EINVAL ;
[Severity: Medium]
Is this missing the prerequisite patch referenced in the commit message?
In arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c, kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() compares id against KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS_NESTEDv2, which is not defined anywhere in the tree, causing compilation of arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c to fail with an undeclared identifier error.
In addition, kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension() in arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c still returns KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS unconditionally for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS; break;
rather than capping the capability at 2048 on nestedv2 as described in the changelog.
Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/183d9a0e755f3735ebd531accb9c193cb40317ce.1793543627.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com?part=1
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 6/7 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix error handling during vcore create
In reply to Ritesh Harjani (IBM)kvmppc_vcore_create() can fail and return NULL, this patch fixes the error handling when this happens.
vcore and online_vcores count should only be updated when vcore was actually created, otherwise it's state gets messed up for the VM run.
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +6 -4
@@ -3090,10 +3090,12 @@ static int kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) err = -ENOMEM ; vcore =kvmppc_vcore_create (kvm, id & ~(kvm->arch.smt_mode -1 )); -mutex_lock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); - kvm->arch.vcores[core] = vcore; - kvm->arch.online_vcores++; -mutex_unlock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); +if (!vcore) { +mutex_lock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); + kvm->arch.vcores[core] = vcore; + kvm->arch.online_vcores++; +mutex_unlock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); + } } }
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5
[email protected]
AI reviewRe: [PATCHv2 6/7] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix error handling during vcore create
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: inverted vcore check in kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv() --
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: inverted vcore check in kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv() --
commit 03a4203b0b5c05e6f77faafc6f01a945c2457b16
Author: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix error handling during vcore create
This commit adds a NULL check on the vcore returned by kvmppc_vcore_create() in kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv() before updating kvm->arch.vcores[core] and incrementing kvm->arch.online_vcores.
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +0
-0@@ -3090,10 +3090,12 @@ static int kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) err = -ENOMEM ; vcore =kvmppc_vcore_create (kvm, id & ~(kvm->arch.smt_mode -1 ));
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c static int kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) · line 3098
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +6
-4-mutex_lock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); - kvm->arch.vcores[core] = vcore; - kvm->arch.online_vcores++; -mutex_unlock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); +if (!vcore) { +mutex_lock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); + kvm->arch.vcores[core] = vcore; + kvm->arch.online_vcores++; +mutex_unlock (&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); + }
[Severity: High]
Is the condition in if (!vcore) inverted here inkvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv()?
kvmppc_vcore_create() returns a non-NULL struct kvmppc_vcore pointer on success and NULL on allocation failure, and kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv() checks for failure immediately below:
if (!vcore) return err;
With if (!vcore) guarding the mmu_setup_lock block, a successful kvmppc_vcore_create() skips storing vcore in kvm->arch.vcores[core] and incrementing kvm->arch.online_vcores, while still attaching the vcore to vcpu->arch.vcore. Because kvmppc_free_vcores() frees vcores by iterating over kvm->arch.vcores[], any allocated vcore will be leaked on VM teardown, and callers relying on kvm->arch.vcores[] or kvm->arch.online_vcores (such as sibling thread attachment, duplicate vCPU ID detection, kvmppc_update_lpcr(), and kvmhv_set_smt_mode()) will see inconsistent state. Conversely, if kvmppc_vcore_create() fails and returns NULL, kvm->arch.online_vcores is incremented before returning -ENOMEM.
Should this check be if (vcore) instead?
Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/ca419693358e3af49b1dfa7887b34b8ef91a5daf.1793543627.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com?part=1
Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
reviewerPATCH v2 7/7 KVM: PPC: Book3s: nestedv2: Free the guest state buffers if vcpu create fails
In reply to Ritesh Harjani (IBM)On a nestedv2 host, kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv() first creates the vCPU in the L0 with kvmhv_nestedv2_vcpu_create(), which also allocates the guest state messages and the run input/output buffers. Only after that it picks a vcore for the vCPU - which can actually fail.
This patch therefore takes care of freeing the GSM abd GSB for nestedv2 if an error occurs later as part of the cleanup routine.
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +4 -1
@@ -3099,8 +3099,11 @@ static int kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } } -if (!vcore) +if (!vcore) { +if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2 ()) +kvmhv_nestedv2_vcpu_free (vcpu, &vcpu->arch.nestedv2_io);return err; + }spin_lock (&vcore->lock); ++vcore->num_threads;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5