alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rules
PATCH 1/1 alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rules
If alsa-utils configure is not passed a --with-udev-rules-dir option then it defaults to using /lib/udev/rules.d. This meant that the hard-coded use of ${D}/lib in do_install in 262e69c9c7acf0beb7bb6b96299e3c993c906434 worked correctly to remove the unwanted rules.
Subsequently, 0a4372705a030ca54ed420cdfec33d46ab93499c changed do_install to use ${nonarch_base_libdir}, claiming to fix this in the usrmerge case.
This means that if udev is not present in PACKAGECONFIG and usrmerge is present in DISTRO_FEATURES then the alsa-utils build system will install the rules in ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d but do_install will attempt to remove ${D}/usr/lib, resulting in something like:
rmdir: failed to remove '.../tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/alsa-utils/1.1.5-r0/image/usr/lib': No such file or directory
To fix this, let's just tell configure to install the rules in a specific known location when udev is disabled. This location can then easily be cleaned up in do_install.
Tested both with and without usrmerge in DISTRO_FEATURES.
--- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +4 -4
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG ??= "udev" # or no alsabat at all. PACKAGECONFIG[bat] = "--enable-bat,--disable-bat,fftwf" -PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,,udev" +PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,--with-udev-rules-dir=/unwanted/rules.d,udev" PACKAGECONFIG[manpages] = "--enable-xmlto, --disable-xmlto, xmlto-native docbook-xml-dtd4-native docbook-xsl-stylesheets-native" SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/utils/alsa-utils-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ do_install() { rm -f ${D}${sbindir}/alsabat-test.sh if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'udev', 'false', 'true', d)}; then - # This is where alsa-utils will install its rules if we don't tell it anything else. - rm -rf ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/udev - rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir} + # If udev is disabled, we told configure to install the rules in /unwanted, so + # we can get rid of them now. + rm -rf ${D}/unwanted fi }
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
Quoted 19 lines · Mike Crowe
If alsa-utils configure is not passed a --with-udev-rules-dir option then it defaults to using
/lib/udev/rules.d. This meant that the hard-coded use of ${D}/lib indo_installin262e69c9c7acf0beb7bb6b96299e3c993c906434worked correctly to remove the unwanted rules.Subsequently,
0a4372705a030ca54ed420cdfec33d46ab93499cchangeddo_installto use ${nonarch_base_libdir}, claiming to fix this in the usrmerge case.This means that if udev is not present in PACKAGECONFIG and usrmerge is present in
DISTRO_FEATURESthen the alsa-utils build system will install the rules in ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d butdo_installwill attempt to remove ${D}/usr/lib, resulting in something like:rmdir: failed to remove '.../tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/alsa-utils/1.1.5-r0/image/usr/lib': No such file or directory
To fix this, let's just tell configure to install the rules in a specific known location when udev is disabled. This location can then easily be cleaned up in
do_install.
Quoted 8 lines
Tested both with and without usrmerge in
DISTRO_FEATURES.Signed-off-by Mike Crowe <[email protected]>Cc Phil Blundell <[email protected]>Cc Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]>--- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Signature · 4 lines
Tanu https://liberapay.com/tanuk https://www.patreon.com/tanuk
Quoted 53 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Crowe
Sent: den 1 maj 2018 13:37
To: [email protected]
Cc: Mike Crowe <[email protected]>; Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]>
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rulesIf alsa-utils configure is not passed a --with-udev-rules-dir option then it defaults to using
/lib/udev/rules.d. This meant that the hard-coded use of ${D}/lib indo_installin262e69c9c7acf0beb7bb6b96299e3c993c906434worked correctly to remove the unwanted rules.Subsequently,
0a4372705a030ca54ed420cdfec33d46ab93499cchangeddo_installto use ${nonarch_base_libdir}, claiming to fix this in the usrmerge case.This means that if udev is not present in PACKAGECONFIG and usrmerge is present in
DISTRO_FEATURESthen the alsa-utils build system will install the rules in ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d butdo_installwill attempt to remove ${D}/usr/lib, resulting in something like:rmdir: failed to remove '.../tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/alsa-utils/1.1.5-r0/image/usr/lib': No such file or directory
To fix this, let's just tell configure to install the rules in a specific known location when udev is disabled. This location can then easily be cleaned up in
do_install.Tested both with and without usrmerge in
DISTRO_FEATURES.Signed-off-by Mike Crowe <[email protected]>Cc Phil Blundell <[email protected]>Cc Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]>--- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +1
-1@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG ??= "udev" # or no alsabat at all. PACKAGECONFIG[bat] = "--enable-bat,--disable-bat,fftwf" -PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,,udev" +PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,--with-udev-rules-dir=/unwanted/rules.d,udev" PACKAGECONFIG[manpages] = "--enable-xmlto, --disable-xmlto, xmlto-native docbook-xml-dtd4-native docbook-xsl-stylesheets-native" SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/utils/alsa-utils-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb do_install() { · line 104
Quoted 3 lines
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +0
-0@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ do_install() { rm -f ${D}${sbindir}/alsabat-test.sh if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'udev', 'false', 'true', d)}; then
I suggest that you remove the if-statement since the /unwanted directory shall always be removed if it exists so there is no need to test for it.
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb do_install() { · line 107
Quoted 6 lines
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +3
-3- # This is where alsa-utils will install its rules if we don't tell it anything else. - rm -rf ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/udev - rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir} + # If udev is disabled, we told configure to install the rules in /unwanted, so + # we can get rid of them now. + rm -rf ${D}/unwanted
Correct the indentation (the rest of the function is indented using tabs).
Quoted 4 lines
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +0
-1fi } --2.11.0
//Peter
PATCH v2 1/1 alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rules
If alsa-utils configure is not passed a --with-udev-rules-dir option then it defaults to using /lib/udev/rules.d. This meant that the hard-coded use of ${D}/lib in do_install in 262e69c9c7acf0beb7bb6b96299e3c993c906434 worked correctly to remove the unwanted rules.
Subsequently, 0a4372705a030ca54ed420cdfec33d46ab93499c changed do_install to use ${nonarch_base_libdir}, claiming to fix this in the usrmerge case.
This means that if udev is not present in PACKAGECONFIG and usrmerge is present in DISTRO_FEATURES then the alsa-utils build system will install the rules in ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d but do_install will attempt to remove ${D}/usr/lib, resulting in something like:
rmdir: failed to remove '.../tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/alsa-utils/1.1.5-r0/image/usr/lib': No such file or directory
To fix this, let's just tell configure to install the rules in a specific known location when udev is disabled. This location can then easily be cleaned up in do_install without doing any harm if udev is enabled.
Tested both with and without usrmerge in DISTRO_FEATURES and with and without udev in PACKAGECONFIG.
--- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +5 -6
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG ??= "udev" # or no alsabat at all. PACKAGECONFIG[bat] = "--enable-bat,--disable-bat,fftwf" -PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,,udev" +PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,--with-udev-rules-dir=/unwanted/rules.d,udev" PACKAGECONFIG[manpages] = "--enable-xmlto, --disable-xmlto, xmlto-native docbook-xml-dtd4-native docbook-xsl-stylesheets-native" SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/utils/alsa-utils-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
@@ -101,9 +101,8 @@ do_install() { rm ${D}${sbindir}/alsa-info.sh rm -f ${D}${sbindir}/alsabat-test.sh - if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'udev', 'false', 'true', d)}; then - # This is where alsa-utils will install its rules if we don't tell it anything else. - rm -rf ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/udev - rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir} - fi + # If udev is disabled, we told configure to install the rules + # in /unwanted, so we can remove them now. If udev is enabled, + # then /unwanted won't exist and this will have no effect. + rm -rf ${D}/unwanted }
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
Quoted 65 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Crowe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 2 maj 2018 15:38
To: [email protected]
Cc: Mike Crowe <[email protected]>; Phil Blundell <[email protected]>; Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCHv2] alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rulesIf alsa-utils configure is not passed a --with-udev-rules-dir option then it defaults to using
/lib/udev/rules.d. This meant that the hard-coded use of ${D}/lib indo_installin262e69c9c7acf0beb7bb6b96299e3c993c906434worked correctly to remove the unwanted rules.Subsequently,
0a4372705a030ca54ed420cdfec33d46ab93499cchangeddo_installto use ${nonarch_base_libdir}, claiming to fix this in the usrmerge case.This means that if udev is not present in PACKAGECONFIG and usrmerge is present in
DISTRO_FEATURESthen the alsa-utils build system will install the rules in ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d butdo_installwill attempt to remove ${D}/usr/lib, resulting in something like:rmdir: failed to remove '.../tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/alsa-utils/1.1.5-r0/image/usr/lib': No such file or directory
To fix this, let's just tell configure to install the rules in a specific known location when udev is disabled. This location can then easily be cleaned up in
do_installwithout doing any harm if udev is enabled.Tested both with and without usrmerge in
DISTRO_FEATURESand with and without udev in PACKAGECONFIG.Signed-off-by Mike Crowe <[email protected]>Cc Phil Blundell <[email protected]>Cc Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]>--- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +1
-1@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG ??= "udev" # or no alsabat at all. PACKAGECONFIG[bat] = "--enable-bat,--disable-bat,fftwf" -PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,,udev" +PACKAGECONFIG[udev] = "--with-udev-rules-dir=`pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev`/rules.d,--with-udev-rules-dir=/unwanted/rules.d,udev" PACKAGECONFIG[manpages] = "--enable-xmlto, --disable-xmlto, xmlto-native docbook-xml-dtd4-native docbook-xsl-stylesheets-native" SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/utils/alsa-utils-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +4
-6@@ -101,9 +101,8 @@ do_install() { rm ${D}${sbindir}/alsa-info.sh rm -f ${D}${sbindir}/alsabat-test.sh - if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'udev', 'false', 'true', d)}; then - # This is where alsa-utils will install its rules if we don't tell it anything else. - rm -rf ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/udev - rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir} - fi + # If udev is disabled, we told configure to install the rules + # in /unwanted, so we can remove them now. If udev is enabled, + # then /unwanted won't exist and this will have no effect. + rm -rf ${D}/unwanted } --
Quoted 1 line
2.11.0
//Peter
Quoted 4 lines · Peter Kjellerstedt
Quoted 1 line
if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'udev', 'false', 'true', d)}; then
I suggest that you remove the if-statement since the /unwanted directory shall always be removed if it exists so there is no need to test for it.
I had wondered about doing that myself, but had decided to make as few changes as possible.
Quoted 9 lines
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb do_install() { · line 107
Quoted 6 lines
meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb +3
-3- # This is where alsa-utils will install its rules if we don't tell it anything else. - rm -rf ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/udev - rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir} + # If udev is disabled, we told configure to install the rules in /unwanted, so + # we can get rid of them now. + rm -rf ${D}/unwantedCorrect the indentation (the rest of the function is indented using tabs).
I'd spotted that, and had thought that I'd sorted it out. It turns out that I ended up making it even worse with a mixture of spaces and tabs. :(
Hopefully v2 is better.
Thanks.
Mike.